Survey Tenders
Survey Tenders
DEPT OF THE NAVY USA Tender
Agriculture or Forestry Works
United States
Details: Update 19 Dec 2024 - This Solicition Is Amended As Follows: Proposal Due Date Is Extended To 08:00 A.m. Local On 07 Jan 2025. Pre-proposal Inquiries Are Included With The Current Amendment. The Biological Assessment Is Also Included In This Announcement. All Other Terms And Conditions Remain Unchanged.
1. Introduction
public Works Department (pwd) Pensacola Intends To Solicit Competitive Quotes In Support Of Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Southeast (navfac Se) Located At Naval Air Station (nas) Pensacola, Florida, Using Commercial Items Prepared In Accordance With Far Subpart 12.6 And Simplified Acquisition Procedures (sap) For Commercial Items Found At Far Part 13.5, Supplemented With Additional Information Included In This Request For Quotes (rfq). Quotations Will Be Due On Or About 07 Jan 2025. Navfac Se Pwd Pensacola Intends To Award A Commercial Services Firm Fixed-price (ffp) Contract On Or About 20 Jan 2025.
2. Requirement
this Is A Contract To Perform Tree Clearing At The Transition Areas Located At Nas Pensacola Sherman Airfield. This Is An Active Airfield, And Is Home To The Navy’s Blue Angels Squadron, Three Navy Training Squadrons And Two Air Force Squadrons, Who Regularly Engage In Daily Flight Patterns Which Are Impacted By Trees Located Within The Transition Areas.
the Project Scope Is Intended To Provide Tree Cutting/clearing Services To Remove All Trees And Ground Brush Within The Upland Areas And Remove Selected Trees Within The Wetland Areas. Cleared Upland Areas Shall Be Prepared To Promote And Allow Natural Vegetation To Resume With Preparing Ground Conditions For Future Periodic Mowing. Prior To Commencing Work For Clearing Trees And Brush, The Contractor Is Responsible To Prepare, Submit, And Obtain The Necessary Land Surveys, Permitting And Governmental/state Approvals Per Satisfaction Of Pwd Environmental Department’s Review, Approval, And Official Record Keeping.
the Location For The Work To Be Performed Is On And Around Sherman Field At Nas Pensacola, Fl. Further Detailed Information Is Included In The Sow And Exhibits Attached To This Notice.
3. Synopsis Of Requirement
the Contract Is Anticipated To Have A Final Period Of Performance Of 365 Calendar Days From Date Of Award. The North American Industry Classification System (naics) Code For This Acquisition Is 561730 – Landscaping Services, With A Size Standard Of $9.5m. The Federal Supply Code (fsc) Is S208, Grounds Maintenance. This Requirement Is 100% Set-aside For Small Business Only Concerns With The Applicable Naics. Applicable Concerns Must Have An Active Registration In The System For Award Management (www.sam.gov) And Eligible For A Determination Of Responsibility From The Sba.
4. Required Site Visit
the Site Visit Is Scheduled For 05 Dec 2024 At 1000 Local Time. Please Contact Tanner Mckenzie At Tanner.r.mckenzie.ctr@us.navy.mil Or Theo Kramer At Theodore.kramer2.civ@us.navy.mil To Coordinate Base Access. This Will Be The Only Site Visit, And Individual Requests To Re-visit The Site At A Later Date Will Not Be Considered.
quotations Submitted By Offerors Who Do Not Attend, Or Were Not Represented, At The Site Visit Will Not Be Considered For Award. It Is Considered Impractical To Determine, Without Inspection, The Exact Nature Of The Work And Site Conditions Under Which The Work Is To Be Performed.
5. Proposal Requirements
offerors Are Required To Submit Proposals To The Contracting Officer No Later Than 05:00 Pm Central Time On 18 Dec 2024. Proposals Must Meet The Requirements As Detailed In Instruction To Offerors In The Attached Solicitation. Faxed Or Mailed Copies Will Not Be Considered. Proposals That Do Not Meet The Requirements In The Solicitation Will Not Be Considered For Award. Award Will Be Made To The Offeror With The Lowest Price And Determination Of Responsibility By The Sba.
6. Additional Information
any Aforementioned Dates Are Subject To Change. All Amendments To The Solicitation Will Be Posted With This Notice. Offerors Are Cautioned To Check This Notice Periodically For Amendments. A Solicitation Mailing List Will Not Be Compiled And Amendments Will Not Be Sent Out In Paper Copy.
Closing Date7 Jan 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
DEPT OF THE NAVY USA Tender
Aerospace and Defence
United States
Details: Navy Reentry Systems Technical Engineering Services (non-da/pa)
synopsis
this Is A Sources Sought Notice (ssn) Announcement. Ssns Are Issued To Assist The Agency In Performing Market Research To Determine Industry Interest And Capability. No Proposals Are Being Requested Or Accepted With This Synopsis. This Is Not A Solicitation For Proposals And No Contract Shall Be Awarded From This Synopsis. Therefore, No Proposals Are Being Requested Or Accepted In Response To This Ssn.
5.0 Purpose
in Accordance With (iaw) Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 10, Ssp Is Conducting Market Research To Determine If Sources Are Capable Of Successfully Performing The Requirements Identified In This Ssn. Specifically, Ssp Is Seeking Capable Firms For Engineering And Technical Services With An Emphasis On Navy Reentry Bodies (rb) Vulnerability And Performance, Systems Analysis And Effectiveness, Nuclear Weapons Surety And System Safety, Radiological Health And Radiation Control, And Future Navy Program Development As Cited In Paragraph 8.0 Below.
the Contract Type Will Include Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Level Of Effort, Term Contract Line Item Numbers (clins). The Period Of Performance (pop) Will Include A Fy26 Effort From 1 October 2025 – 30 September 2026.
note: Given The Highly Technical Nature Of Ssp’s Mission Set As A Major Weapons Systems Command And Corresponding Technical Requirements, Respondents Must Provide Recent And Relevant Past Performance Data (as Detailed Below) To Demonstrate And Substantiate The Respondents Ability To Successfully Execute Requirements Detailed In This Ssn.
6.0 White Paper Capability Statement Credentials
a. Ssp Is Seeking Detailed, Complete, And Thorough White Paper Capability Statements From Interested Firms Who Can Demonstrate And Document, With Evidentiary Support, That They 1) Possess The Minimum Qualifications And Experience Identified In Paragraph 7.0 Which Are Critical To The Successful Execution Of The Requirements, And 2) Demonstrate Recent And Relevant Experience, As The Prime Contractor (or Subcontractor) Performing The Same/similar Efforts Of The Same/similar Scope, Size, And Complexity To The Requirements Identified In Paragraph 8.0. Interested Firms Must Demonstrate Their Existing Capability, Or Potential To Acquire The Capability, To Meet The Requirements Identified In Paragraph 8.0 Requirements By The Time Of Contract Award, Estimated To Be 1 October 2025.
6.1 Small Business Concerns
iaw Far Subpart 19.2 Polices, Ssp Seeks To Provide Maximum Practicable Opportunities In Its Acquisitions To Small Business, Veteran-owned Small Business, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business, Hubzone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, And Women-owned Small Business Concerns. Small Business Concerns Who Possess The Minimum Qualifications And Experience Identified In Paragraph 7.0 And Who Can Demonstrate Its Concerns’ Capability (or Ability To Obtain The Capability By The Contract Award Date) To Execute The Complete Requirements Identified In The Requirements Identified In Paragraph 8.0, As Well Provide The Requisite Past Performance Experience Detailed In Section 9.0, Are Encouraged To Respond To This Ssn.
if A Small Business Concern Intends To Partner With Another Entity, The Small Business Concern Must Identify Which Specific Requirements Identified In Paragraph 8.0 Efforts/tasks It Intends To Perform, As Well As The Specific Efforts/tasks The Partner Will Perform, With The Substantiating Data Required In This Ssn Supporting The Identified Partnering Roles And Responsibilities. Note: 100% Of The Requirements Identified In Paragraph 8.0 Structure And Ssn Requirements Must Be Addressed In Any Submitted Partnering Submittal, If Obtainable.
note: In The Event This Contract Is Set Aside For Small Business Concerns, The Small Business Concern Agrees That It Will Be In Strict Compliance And Conformance With The Percentage Payment Limitations For Services, Supplies, Or Construction (as Applicable) To Subcontractors That Are Not Similarly Situated Entities In Accordance With Far 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting And State Such In Their Response.
7.0 Minimum Qualifications / Experience Requirements
interested Firms Shall Document And Submit Specific And Evidenced / Demonstrated Possession Of The Minimum Qualifications And Experience Requirements In The Technical Areas Identified In Bullets A Through Z Below Which Are Critical To The Successful Execution Of The Requirements In Paragraph 8.0. This Experience Shall Be Documented As Specified In Paragraph 9.0. Potential Sources Must Have The Ability To, Or Have A Thorough Understanding Of The Following:
hostile Environments, Natural Space Environments, Fratricide Environments, And Intrinsic Radiation Environments Relevant To Navy Rbs And Their Applicability To Vulnerability And Performance. Hostile Environments Include, But Are Not Limited To: Nuclear Weapons, Electromagnetic Radiation, Kinetic Energy Weapons, And Directed Energy Weapons. Natural Space Environments Include, But Are Not Limited To: Cosmic Radiation, Trapped Protons And Electrons, Solar Flares, And Coronal Mass Ejections.
navy Rb’s Vulnerability And Performance Concerns Including Accuracy Perturbations Resulting From Exposure To Hostile Environments, Natural Space Environments, And/or Fratricide Environments.
vulnerability And Effectiveness Of Navy Rbs And Rb Components In The Following Environments: Mechanical, Electrical, And/or Electromagnetic Effects.
conduct Hostile And Fratricide Radiation Transport Calculations For Navy Reentry Systems.
calculate Personnel Dose Rate In Both The Existing Ohio Class Submarine And The Planned Columbia Class Submarine.
conduct Performance And Vulnerability Assessments For Normal, Abnormal And Hostile Environments In Support Of A New Thermal Protection Systems (tps) Development Program For Navy Rbs
calculate Electromagnetic Attenuation, Signal Degradation, Or Radio Frequency Signal Blackout Brought On By Reentry Plasma Sheathing.
conduct Independent Assessments Of Hypersonic Reentry Plasma Sheathing And Subsequent Effects On Electromagnetic Signal Transmission.
conduct Ground Based Hostile Blast Analysis Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (cfd) Models.
assist Ssp With Intrinsic Radiation (inrad) Studies At Both Ssp Facilities And On Board Ssbn’s, And Radioactive Waste Characterization, Storage And Disposal.
analyze Biological Effects Of Radiation From Plutonium, Tritium And Uranium Including Emitter Effects. Analyze The Effects Of Postulated Radiological Events.
analyze Results Of Site Contamination Surveys To Ensure A Safe Working Environment To Include Gamma And Neutron Test/surveys.
evaluate, Monitor, Review, And Update All Navy Related Documentation Such As Special Weapons Ordnance Publications (swops), Directives, Instructions, Ordnance Documents (ods), Etc.
conduct Independent Assessments Of The Transporting, Processing, Handling And Maintenance Procedures And The Monitoring Techniques (air And Surface) That Apply To Hazardous Materials (radioactive And Mixed Waste) And Gamma And Neutron Personnel Exposure.
produce And/or Coordinate Requirements Documents Including Military Characteristics (mcs), Stockpile-to-target Sequences (stss), And Technical Objectives And Guidelines (togs). Provide Input Regarding The Dod Nuclear Weapon System Surety Program Key Elements As Detailed In Dodm 3150.02: Dod Nuclear Weapon System Surety Standards, Dod Nuclear Weapon System Surety Policy, Dod Nuclear Weapon Safety Design Criteria, Positive Measures, Safety Rules And Technical Procedures.
conduct Evaluations Of Deployed And Advanced/future System Options Including Ballistic And Non-ballistic, Strategic And Tactical, Nuclear And Conventional Reentry Systems. These Evaluations Shall Include But Not Be Limited To Assessments Of The Survivability, Military Utility And Effectiveness, And Dynamics Of These Systems And Concepts In Normal, Abnormal And Hostile Environments Against The Full Spectrum Of Targets.
evaluate And Support All Facets Of Nuclear Weapons Surety. Nuclear Weapons Surety Is Defined As Policies, Procedures, Controls And Actions That Encompass Safety, Security And Control Measures, Which Ensure There Will Be No Nuclear Weapons Accidents, Incidents, Unauthorized Detonation, Or Degradation Of Weapons Effectiveness During Its Stockpile-to-target Sequence.
advise Ssp On The Impact Of Dod, Nnsa, Nrc, Code Of Federal Regulations, Don, State, And Local Radiological Regulations Affecting Navy’s Nuclear Weapons.
conduct Independent Reviews/assessments And Evaluate Both Conventional And Nuclear Weapon System Safety Policies, Directives, Standards And Proposed Changes Pertinent To Conventional/nuclear Weapon System Surety/safety For Ssp Hq Staff, Field Activities (e.g. Notu, Swflant, Swfpac, Sws Ashore, Spf), Ssbns (including Us Columbia Class Ssbn And Uk Dreadnaught Ssbn), And Ssgns, Including, As Directed, Activities Associated With The United Kingdom Trident Program.
conduct Independent Reviews Of Ssp Alterations (spalts), Change Requests Or Other Modifications, New Developments, Lightning Protection And Grounding Systems, Electrostatic Discharge (esd), Ssp Occupational Safety And Health (osh) Efforts, Operational Safety Reviews (osr), Special Safety Study (sss), And Independent Assessments Of System Safety Policies And Practices Iaw Dodi And Dodm 3150.02, Ssp 5100.6, Sspinst 5100.2 (series) And Other Sspinst, Ordnance Document (od), Secnav/opnav Directives Or Other Uk Trident Guidance.
provide Expert Advice Regarding The Analysis And Interpretation Of Overarching Statutes, Policy, Directives, Regulations, Instructions, Etc. As They Specifically Apply To Ssp’s Classification & Declassification Management Efforts Based On Knowledge Of Organizational Stakeholders And Past, Current, & Planned Future States Of The Programs.
provide Expert Classification Determination Support Based On Knowledge Of Security Classification Guides That Relate To All Aspects Of The Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (slbm) Weapon System.
calculate The Responses Of Us Components In The Uk Trident Reentry Body To Stockpile- To-target-sequence (sts) Level Hostile Environments, Consider Both Single And Multiple Exposures In Their Calculations.
perform Fratricide Evaluations For The Uk Trident Reentry Body That Will Identify Potential Differences In The Stay-out Regions Caused By Uk Unique Constraints, And Assist The Uk In Understanding And/or Adopting The Current Us Common Fratricide Methodology.
conduct Evaluations Of The Aerodynamic Performance Of The Uk Trident Reentry Body Using Data From U.s. Demonstration And Shakedown Operation (daso) Flight Test, Follow-on Commander Evaluation Test (fcet) Flights, And Other Experimental Flight Test For These Evaluations Conduct Evaluations Of The Effectiveness Of The Uk Trident Reentry Body Provide Electronic File Transmission Support Between The Uk, The Us Navy And Doe/nnsa Information System Repositories And Databases.
advise Ssp On The Proficiency Of The Operations At Uk Trident Facilities. This Activity Will Include Participation In Inspections And Evaluations, Preparation Of Associated Supporting Reference Materials, Evaluation Of Uk Proposals, And Participation In Compatibility Assessments Or Slow Run-through Activities.
8.0 Description Of Requirements
requirement: Ssp Is Seeking Responsible Sources For Engineering And Technical Services With An Emphasis On Navy Reentry Bodies (rb) Vulnerability And Performance, Systems Analysis And Effectiveness, Nuclear Weapons Surety And System Safety, Radiological Health And Radiation Control, Future Navy Program Development, And Be Familiar With Article Vi Of The Polaris Sales Agreement (psa) . Potential Sources Must Have The Ability To, Or Have A Thorough Understanding Of The Following:
hostile Environments, Natural Space Environments, Fratricide Environments, And Intrinsic Radiation Environments Relevant To Navy Rbs And Their Applicability To Vulnerability And Performance. Hostile Environments Include, But Are Not Limited To: Nuclear Weapons, Electromagnetic Radiation, Kinetic Energy Weapons, And Directed Energy Weapons. Natural Space Environments Include, But Are Not Limited To: Cosmic Radiation, Trapped Protons And Electrons, Solar Flares, And Coronal Mass Ejections.
navy Rb’s Vulnerability And Performance Concerns Including Accuracy Perturbations Resulting From Exposure To Hostile Environments, Natural Space Environments, And/or Fratricide Environments.
vulnerability And Effectiveness Of Navy Rbs And Rb Components In The Following Environments: Mechanical, Electrical, And/or Electromagnetic Effects.
conduct Hostile And Fratricide Radiation Transport Calculations For Navy Reentry Systems.
calculate Personnel Dose Rate In Both The Existing Ohio Class Submarine And The Planned Columbia Class Submarine.
conduct Performance And Vulnerability Assessments For Normal, Abnormal And Hostile Environments In Support Of A New Thermal Protection Systems (tps) Development Program For Navy Rbs.
calculate Electromagnetic Attenuation, Signal Degradation, Or Radio Frequency Signal Blackout Brought On By Reentry Plasma Sheathing.
conduct Independent Assessments Of Hypersonic Reentry Plasma Sheathing And Subsequent Effects On Electromagnetic Signal Transmission.
conduct Ground Based Hostile Blast Analysis Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (cfd) Models.
assist Ssp With Intrinsic Radiation (inrad) Studies At Both Ssp Facilities And On Board Ssbn’s, And Radioactive Waste Characterization, Storage And Disposal.
analyze Biological Effects Of Radiation From Plutonium, Tritium And Uranium Including Emitter Effects.
analyze The Effects Of Postulated Radiological Events.
analyze Results Of Site Contamination Surveys To Ensure A Safe Working Environment To Include Gamma And Neutron Test/surveys.
write, Evaluate, Monitor, Review, And Update All Navy Related Documentation Such As Special Weapons Ordnance Publications (swops), Directives, Instructions, Ordnance Documents (ods), Etc.
conduct Independent Assessments Of The Transporting, Processing, Handling And Maintenance Procedures And The Monitoring Techniques (air And Surface) That Apply To Hazardous Materials (radioactive And Mixed Waste) And Gamma And Neutron Personnel Exposure.
produce And/or Coordinate Requirements Documents Including Military Characteristics (mcs), Stockpile-to-target Sequences (stss), And Technical Objectives And Guidelines (togs). Provide Input Regarding The Dod Nuclear Weapon System Surety Program Key Elements As Detailed In Dodm 3150.02: Dod Nuclear Weapon System Surety Standards, Dod Nuclear Weapon System Surety Policy, Dod Nuclear Weapon Safety Design Criteria, Positive Measures, Safety Rules And Technical Procedures.
conduct Evaluations Of Deployed And Advanced/future System Options Including Ballistic And Non-ballistic, Strategic And Tactical, Nuclear And Conventional Reentry Systems. These Evaluations Shall Include But Not Be Limited To Assessments Of The Survivability, Military Utility And.effectiveness, And Dynamics Of These Systems And Concepts In Normal, Abnormal And Hostile Environments Against The Full Spectrum Of Targets.
evaluate And Support All Facets Of Nuclear Weapons Surety. Nuclear Weapons Surety Is Defined As Policies, Procedures, Controls And Actions That Encompass Safety, Security And Control Measures, Which Ensure There Will Be No Nuclear Weapons Accidents, Incidents, Unauthorized Detonation, Or Degradation Of Weapons Effectiveness During Its Stockpile-to-target Sequence.
advise Ssp On The Impact Of Dod, Nnsa, Nrc, Code Of Federal Regulations, Don, State, And Local Radiological Regulations Affecting Navy’s Nuclear Weapons.
conduct Independent Reviews/assessments And Evaluate Both Conventional And Nuclear Weapon System Safety Policies, Directives, Standards And Proposed Changes Pertinent To Conventional/nuclear Weapon System Surety/safety For Ssp Hq Staff, Field Activities (e.g. Notu, Swflant, Swfpac, Sws Ashore, Spf), Ssbns (including Us Columbia Class Ssbn And Uk Dreadnaught Ssbn), And Ssgns, Including, As Directed, Activities Associated With The United Kingdom Trident Program.
conduct Independent Reviews Of Ssp Alterations (spalts), Change Requests Or Other Modifications, New Developments, Lightning Protection And Grounding Systems, Electrostatic Discharge (esd), Ssp Occupational Safety And Health (osh) Efforts, Operational Safety Reviews (osr), Special Safety Study (sss), And Independent Assessments Of System Safety Policies And Practices Iaw Dodi And Dodm 3150.02, Ssp 5100.6, Sspinst 5100.2 (series) And Other Sspinst, Ordnance Document (od), Secnav/opnav Directives Or Other Uk Trident Guidance.
provide Expert Advice Regarding The Analysis And Interpretation Of Overarching Statutes, Policy, Directives, Regulations, Instructions, Etc. As They Specifically Apply To Ssp’s Classification & Declassification Management Efforts Based On Knowledge Of Organizational Stakeholders And Past, Current, & Planned Future States Of The Programs.
provide Expert Classification Determination Support Based On Knowledge Of Security Classification Guides That Relate To All Aspects Of The Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (slbm) Weapon System.
calculate The Responses Of Us Components In The Uk Trident Reentry Body To Stockpile- To-target-sequence (sts) Level Hostile Environments, Consider Both Single And Multiple Exposures In Their Calculations.
perform Fratricide Evaluations For The Uk Trident Reentry Body That Will Identify Potential Differences In The Stay-out Regions Caused By Uk Unique Constraints, And Assist The Uk In Understanding And/or Adopting The Current Us Common Fratricide Methodology.
conduct Evaluations Of The Aerodynamic Performance Of The Uk Trident Reentry Body Using Data From U.s. Demonstration And Shakedown Operation (daso) Flight Test, Follow-on Commander Evaluation Test (fcet) Flights, And Other Experimental Flight Test For These Evaluations.
conduct Evaluations Of The Effectiveness Of The Uk Trident Reentry Body.
provide Electronic File Transmission Support Between The Uk, The Us Navy And Doe/nnsa Information System Repositories And Databases.
advise Ssp On The Proficiency Of The Operations At Uk Trident Facilities. This Activity Will Include Participation In Inspections And Evaluations, Preparation Of Associated Supporting Reference Materials, Evaluation Of Uk Proposals, And Participation In Compatibility Assessments Or Slow Run-through Activities.
8.1 Place Of Performance
within Walking Distance (less Than ½ Mile) Of The Washington Navy Yard Dc, United States: Host An Esn Terminal And Esn Vtc Capability. Esn Is The Only Classified Conduit To Discuss Secret Rd/frd Or Cnwdi Data With Nnsa As Well As Secret Atomic And Secret Atomic Principle Data With The United Kingdom. Ssp Does Not House This Capability.
classified Conference Rooms For Meetings Between Department Of Navy And Department Of Energy.
within Driving Distance (less Than 10 Miles) Of Sandia National Laboratories In Albuquerque, Nm, United States:
esn Terminal And Esn Vtc Capability.
classified Conference Rooms For Meetings Between Department Of Navy And Department Of Energy.
within Driving Distance (less Than 10 Miles) Of Colorado Springs, Co
maintain Hostile And Vulnerability Test Capabilities.
9.0 Evidentiary Qualifications/experience Documentation Requirements
interested Firms Must Possess The Requisite Minimum Qualifications And Experience Identified In Paragraph 7.0 And Demonstrated Relevant And Recent Experience As It Relates To The Requirements In Paragraph 8.0. White Paper Capability Statements Must Include All Of The Content And Details Identified Below:
9.1 Minimum Qualifications / Experience Requirements Validation
white Paper Capability Statement Submissions Shall Include A Discrete Section With The Heading “minimum Qualifications / Experience Requirements” And Document, With Specific Information, Each Of The Minimum Qualifications Identified In Paragraph 7.0. This Section May Cite Contract Reference Efforts Detailed In Table A Of Paragraph 9.2 Below Provided That Respondents Provide Context And Rationale As To How That Contract Reference Effort(s) Demonstrate Possession Of The Applicable Minimum Qualifications / Experience Requirements Of Bullets A Through Z Identified In Paragraph 7.0 – Or Have Capability Of Obtaining By Contract Award.
9.2 Relevant & Recent Experience / Supporting Narratives
in Addition To Demonstrating Possession Of The Requisite Minimum Qualifications / Experience Requirements Identified In Paragraph 7.0 Above (or Have Capability Of Obtaining By Contract Award), Interested Firms Shall Demonstrate Relevant And Recent Experience Performing The Same Or Similar Efforts And Or Completion Tasks (as Applicable) To The Requirements In Paragraph 8.0. Relevant Experience Is Defined As Performing Efforts/tasks Similar In Scope, Size, And Complexity As The Ssn Clin Structure With An Annual Incurred Cost/expense Of At Least $10m. Recent Experience Is Defined As Work Performed Within 5 Years Of The Ssn Posting Date. To Substantiate The Performance Of Relevant And Recent Efforts/tasks To The Ssn Clin Requirements, White Paper Capability Statements Shall Provide A List Of Current Or Previous Contract References And The Efforts/tasks Performed Thereunder Detailing And Evidencing A Direct Correlation Of The Contract Reference Efforts/tasks To The Ssn Clin Structure Using The Specific Outline Provided In Table A Below. Submitter’s Responses To The Table A Ssn Clin Outline Shall Include The Following Information Per Individual Contract Reference:
summary Of Relevant Work Performed And How That Specific Work Demonstrates Capability To Perform The Specific Requirements Identified In The Ssn Clins;
current / Prior Contract Number(s) And Customer/agency Supported;
identification Of Your Role As The Prime Or Subcontractor;
contract Type: Cost Plus Fixed Fee Loe
period Of Performance Of The Specific Contract Reference Effort Performed;
quantity Of Fte Personnel Utilized On The Specific Contract Reference Effort, Per Annum, With Distinction And Fte Quantities Identified Between The Respondents Fte Employees And Any Subcontractor Fte Employees;
net Dollar Value (base And Options) For Each Contract Reference And The Annual Incurred Costs For Each Contract Reference Provided Which Demonstrates The Magnitude Of Those Contract References In Comparison To The Annual Estimated Value Cited In Paragraph 9.2 Above. Note: Solely Citing An Idiq Ceiling Amount Or Base And All Options Aggregate Value Without The Annual Incurred Costs For The Submitted Contract Reference(s) Is Not Acceptable – Amounts Must Be Specific To The Actual Incurred Costs For A Contract Clin(s) Or Individual Task Order(s), For The Contract Reference(s) Cited In Table A Below; And
customer Point Of Contact (poc) With Valid Phone Number And Email.
table A – Summary Of Relevant & Recent Work Experience
ssn Clin Requirement Contract Reference(s) Summary – Document The Specific Correlation Of The Contract Reference Efforts/tasks To The Ssn Clin Efforts/tasks
0001 0001- System Assessment And Vulnerability
0002 0002- Reentry Systems Mk4b Development
0003 0003- W93/mk7 Reentry System Development Support
0004 0004- Sp20124 Weapon System Safety
0005 0005- United Kingdom (uk) Mk4a Support
0006 0006- United Kingdom (uk) Trident Program Support
0007 0007- United Kingdom (uk) A21/mk7 Programmatic And Testing Support
0008 0008- Weapons Systems Refurbishment / Modification Programs
0081 0081- Weapons Systems Refurbishment/modification Programs
0009 0009- Future Flexibility
0010 0010- Future Sea-based Strategic Weapon (fssw) Program
0011 0011- Missile Assessment And Survivability Support
0012 0012- Le2 Missile Development Survivability Support
0013 0013- Slcm-n Development Program
0131 0131- Slcm-n Esn Area Construction
0014 0014 - Missile Life Extension Programs (d5le2)
0015 0015- Sp202 Systems Analysis And Effectiveness
0016 0016- Sp28 Intrinsic Radiation (inrad) Survey
10.0 Company Information And Deadline For Submittal
white Paper Capability Statements Shall Be Submitted In Pdf Format And Are Due No Later Than January 10, 2025 1700 Eastern. The White Papers Shall Not Exceed 20 Pages In Total, Using 12-point Times New Roman And 1” Margin And Shall Be Submitted Via E-mail To Kurt.geisinger@ssp.navy.mil.
all White Paper Capability Submittals Shall Include The Following Information “not” Included In The Aforementioned Maximum 20-page Limit:
company Administrative Information
company Name:
company Point Of Contact (email And Phone) And Title:
company Address:
unique Entity Identifier (uei) No:
cage Code:
size Of Business, Including; Total Annual Revenue, By Year, For The Past Five Years And Number Of Employees;
ownership, Including Whether: Small Business, Veteran-owned Small Business, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business, Hubzone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, And Women-owned Small Business Concerns;
number Of Years In Business;
identification Of The Current Security Clearance Held At Your Facility That Will Provide Support To The Clin Structure. Note: Work To Be Performed Under This Contract Shall Require The Contractor To Have A Facility Clearance Of Top Secret And A Computing Facility That Is Cleared To Process Top Secret Data.
respondents To This Ssn Shall Indicate Which Portions Of Their Response Are Proprietary/business Sensitive And Should Mark Them Accordingly. It Is The Responsibility Of The Ssn Respondent To Monitor The Sam.gov Website For Additional Information Pertaining To Any Potential Acquisition.
11.0 Government Assessment
the White Paper Capability Statement Responses To This Ssn Must Meet The Requirements Stated In The Ssn And Will Be Reviewed To Determine Whether Each Respondent Is Capable Of Performing The Requirements. This Review Will Be Based Solely On The Specific Data And Supporting Content Provided By The Respondents In Their White Paper Capability Statement Submissions And Responses To Any Follow On Clarification Inquires Submitted By The Government. Incomplete Or Generalized White Paper Capability Statements, Without Specificity As It Relates To The Ssn Content Requirements, Omitted Content, Or Content Which Fails To Address All Of The Requirements Of This Ssn, Will Have A Direct Affect Upon The Government’s Assessment Of The White Paper Submittal. The Government’s Assessment Will Include, But Is Not Limited To, The Following:
(1) The Respondent’s Specific And Evidenced / Demonstrated Possession Of The Minimum Qualifications / Experience Requirements Identified In Paragraph 7.0;
(2) The Respondent’s Demonstrated Ability To Manage, As A Prime Or Subcontractor, The Types And Magnitude Of Requirements Identified In The Ssn Clin Structure Based On Their Relevant And Recent Performance Of Same/similar Efforts/tasks In Terms Of Scope, Size, And Complexity;
(3) The Respondent’s Demonstrated Technical Ability, As A Prime Or Subcontractor, To Execute The Ssn Clin Structure Based On Their Relevant And Recent Performance Of Same/similar Efforts/tasks In Terms Of Scope, Size, And Complexity; And
(4) The Respondent’s Demonstrated Capacity To Execute The Clin Structure Based On Their Relevant And Recent Performance Of Same/similar Efforts In Terms Of Scope, Size, And Complexity, The Quantity Of Personnel Required, And The Contract Award Date.
12.0 Ssn Disclaimer
this Ssn Is Issued Solely For Market Research Purposes. It Does Not Constitute A Request For Proposal (rfp) Nor A Promise To Issue An Rfp In The Future. This Ssn Does Not Commit The Government To Solicit Or Award A Contract. The Information Provided In The Ssn Is Subject To Change And Is Not Binding On The Government. Respondents Are Advised That All Costs Associated With Responding To This Ssn, Including Any Requests For Follow-up Information, Will Be Solely At The Interested Parties’ Expense And The Government Will Not Pay For Any Information Or Costs Incurred Or Associated With Submitting A Ssn White Paper Capability Statement Or Follow-on Responses.
the Government Reserves The Right To Consider A Set-aside For Small Businesses Or One Of The Small Business Preference Groups. (e.g., Small Business, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business, 8(a), Hubzone Small Business, And Women-owned Small Business Programs).
Closing Date10 Jan 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
DEPT OF THE NAVY USA Tender
Others
Corrigendum : Closing Date Modified
United States
Description: Contact Information|4|n793.09|2b2|n/a|kyle.r.matsinger.civ@us.navy.mil|
item Unique Identification And Valuation (jan 2023)|19||||||||||||||||||||
higher-level Contract Quality Requirement|8|x||||||||
wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (jan 2023)|16|invoice And Receiving Reports||n/a|n00383|tbd|tbd|tbd|tbd|||||||||
navy Use Of Abilityone Support Contractor - Release Of Offeror Information (3-18))|1||
equal Opportunity (sep 2016)|2|||
warranty Of Supplies Of A Noncomplex Nature (jun 2003)|6|12 Months After Date Of Delivery|45 Days After Discovery Of Defect|||||
equal Opportuity For Workers With Disabilities (jun 2020)|2|||
buy American-free Trade Agreements-balance Of Payments Program-basic (feb 2024)|11||||||||||||
limitations On Pass-through Charges (jun 2020)|1||
alternate A, Annual Representations And Certifications (oct 2024)|13||||||||||||||
buy American-free Trade Agreements-balance Of Payments Program Certificate-basic (feb 2024))|5||||||
buy American--balance Of Payments Program (feb 2024)|1||
royalty Information (apr 1984)|1||
annual Representations And Certifications (may 2024)|12|332919|750|||||||||||
facsimile Proposals (oct 1997)|1||
notice Of Priority Rating For National Defense, Emergency Preparedness, Andenergy Program Use (apr 2008))|2||x|
this Is A Competitive Spares Requirement For The Items Listed In This Solicitation.
all Contractual Documents (i.e. Contracts, Purchase Orders, Task Orders,
delivery Orders And Modifications) Related To The Instant Procurement
are Considered To Be "issued" By The Government When Copies Are
either Deposited In The Mail, Transmitted By Facsimile, Or Sent By Other
electronic Commerce Methods, Such As Email. The Government's
acceptance Of The Contractor's Proposal Constitutes Bilateral Agreement
to "issue" Contractual Documents As Detailed Herein.
\
1. Scope
1.1 . Markings Shall Be In Accordance With Mil-std-130.
1.2 Pre-award / Post Award Requirements:
due To The Critical Use Of This Item And Its Quality History, A Pre-award Survey And Post-award Conference May Be Required For All New Manufacturers. For All Previous Sources, A Post-award Conference May Be Recommended.
1.3 The Components Being Acquired Under This Solicitation Have Been Classified As Flight Critical Requiring Engineering Source Approval By The Naval Air Systems Command. Only Those Companies Who Have Submitted Requests For Source Approval And Been Approved
will Be Eligible For Award Under This Solicitation. Any Company Not Previously Approved May Submit A Source Approval Request To The Contracting Officer, Naval Inventory Control Point, (see Block 10 Of The
sf33 For Name And Code). The Source Approval Request Shall Contain The Following Documentation And Shall Be Submitted By The Closing Date Of This Solicitation:
(a) Copy Of Complete Configuration Drawings For A Similar Item(s) Which Your Company Has Produced Within The Past Three Years, Including Test Procedures For Which Your Company (1) Has Been Qualified To Manufacture And (2) Which Is Similar, I.e., Requires The
same Materials, Manufacturing Processes, Inspections, Tolerances And Similar Application As The Item(s) For Which You Are Seeking Approval.
(b) Copy Of The Complete Process/operation Sheets Used To Manufacuture The Similar Item, Including But Not Limited To, Detailed Shop Sketches. These Plans Must Note Those Operations And Processes Performed By Subcontractors/ Vendors.
(c) Complete Copies Of Purchase Orders, Shipping Documents, Etc. That Document Delivery Of Production Quantities Of The Part To The Original Equipment Manufacturer Or Military Service. Provide The Most Recent Copies Of The Documents.
(d) A Detailed Comparative Analysis Of The Differences/similarities Between The Similar Part And The Part(s) For Which You Are Seeking Approval. This Analysis Should Include Materials, Configuration, Tolerances, Process Requirements, Dimensions, Castings,
forgings, Etc.
(e) Copy Of Inspection Method Sheets Used In The Manufacturing And At Final Inspection. These Sheets Should Include Actual Tolerance, Print Requirements, Inspection Devices, Sources Performing The Operation And Level Of Inspection. Critical Characteristics
should Be Discernible From All Other Characteristics.
the Above Requirements Are A Subset Of Requirements Specified In The Aso
source Approval Information Brochure Dated January 1995. The Submission Of This Data Subset Is Contingent Upon And In Consideration Of The Submitting Contractor Meeting All Other Requirements Specified In This Solicitation To Include A Bilateral Agreement With
mda Which Includes Availability Of Complete Data, Mrb Disposition, Etc. Any Company Not Having Such Agreement, But Desiring To Seek Engineering Source Approval, Will Be Required To Submit Data Meeting All Requirements Of The Aso/navicp Source Approval
brochure.
1.4 Sampling Rates (aqls) Indicated Below Shall Be Used In Accordance With
ansi Z1.4 For Single Sampling And A General Inspection Level Of Ii.
1.5 In Addition To The 100% Pco Mandatory, Critical And Major Characteristics,
attributes For Plating, Hardness And Non-destructive Testing Will Be Inspected
one Hundred Percent.
1.6 Contractor Shall Develop A System For Identification Of Individual
piece Parts For Traceability Purposes. Markings Shall Not Be Permanent.
1.7 An Aql Of 1.5 Will Be Used For Class 3 Threads And Dimensions, And
geometric Feature Controls With A Tolerance Range Of .010 Or Less.
1.8 For Minor Characteristics, A Sampling Rate Determined By The Contractor
and Subject To Qar Approval Will Be Used.
1.9 The Material Covered In This Contract/purchase Order Will Be Used In A
crucial Shipboard System Enabling The Launch And/or Recovery Of Aircraft. The Use Of Incorrect Or Defective Material Would Create A High Probability Of Failure Resulting In A Serious Personnel Injury, Loss Of Life, Loss Of Vital
shipboard Systems Or Loss Of Aircraft. Therefore,the Material Has Been
designated As Critical Material And Special Control Procedures Are Invoked
to Ensure Receipt Of Correct Material.
1.10 Articles To Be Furnished Hereunder Shall Be Manufactured, Tested And Inspected In Accordance With ;nawc Lakehurst; Drawing Number ( ;6544d025-3; ) ;80020; , Revision ;g; And All Details And Specifications Referenced Therein.
1.11 Unless Expressly Provided For Elsewhere In This Clause, Equipment Such As Fixtures, Jigs, Dies, Patterns, Mylars, Special Tooling, Test Equipment, Or Any Other Manufacturing Aid Required For The Manufacture And/or Testing Of The Subject Item(s) Will Not
be Provided By The Government Or Any Other Source And Is The Sole Responsibility Of The Contractor. The Foregoing Applies Notwithstanding Any Reference To Such Equipment Or The Furnishing Thereof That May Be Contained In Any Drawing Or Referenced
specification.
1.12 If Mil-std-454 Is Referenced In The Drawings Or In The Specification, The Contractor Is Expected To Show Compliance With Ipc/eiaj-std-001c.
2. Applicable Documents
drawing Data=6530c124 |80020| H| |d| | | |
drawing Data=6544d025 |80020| G| |d| | | |
3. Requirements - Not Applicable
4. Quality Assurance
indal Technologies Is A Canadian Company Whose Welding Certification Is In Accordance With The Canadian Welding Bureau (cwb) Vice Navsea Welding Certification Standards. Per Rei 23-22058 The Cwb Welding Certification Is Acceptable.
quality Assurance Requirements
1. The Contractor Shall Perform Quality Conformance And Lot Sampling Inspection For All Associated Features That Are Present In The Drawings And Specifications:
a. Features/attributes/requirements Classified As Critical And Major On The Drawing(s) Or Within The Technical Specification Shall Be Inspected And Shall Have The Actual Dimensions Documented 100%;
b. Attributes For Plating, Hardness, And Non-destructive Testing Shall Be Inspected 100%;
c. Class 3 Threads, Dimensions, And Geometric Feature Controls With A Tolerance Range Of .010 Or Less Shall Be Inspected Using An Aql Of 1.5 And The General Inspection Level Ii As Defined By Ansi Z1.4
d. Minor Characteristics: Sampling Shall Be Inspected Using An Aql Of 4.0 And The General Inspection Level Ii As Defined By Ansi Z1.4.
2. First Article Testing:
the Contractor Shall Conduct First Article Testing On This Item Of Alre/se And Must Address All Elements Listed Below And Prepare A First Article Test Report Documenting The Outcome. Unless Otherwise Specified, The Report And Its Acceptance Shall Be Per The
provisions Of The Applicable Contract Data Requirements List (cdrl).
a. Requirements:
i. First Article Quantity Is One (1); In Uncoated Condition.
ii. The First Article Shall Be Available For Government Evaluation Per The Contract Schedule. The Evaluation Shall Be Conducted In The Presence Of The Government Personnel.
iii. The Contractor Shall Provide Facilities And Personnel Sufficient To Conduct All Necessary Tests To Establish Conformance;
iv. The Contractor Shall Have Available For Review All Certifications, Test Reports, In-process Inspection Documents Needed To Substantiate Product Quality; This Same Documentation Shall Also Be Included In The First Article Test Report;
v. The Contractor Shall, At The Time Of First Article, Have Corrected Any Problem Areas Deemed Significant And Documented As Deficient By The Government Within His/her Quality Assurance System Not Previously Identified During Prior Evaluations And/or Surveys;
any Problems Identified During The Conduct Of The Test Will Also Require Correction.
b. Testing And Evaluation:
i. The Contractor Shall Accomplish 100% Inspection And/or Testing Of All Critical, Major, And Minor Dimensions And/or Requirements Identified In The Drawings, Drawing Notes, And Process And Fabrication Specifications. Results Shall Consist Of Actual Dimensions,
measurements, And Test Outcomes And Shall Be Recorded Andincluded In The First Article Test Report.
c. Acceptance/reject Criteria:
i. Satisfactorily Meeting All Requirements Cited In The First Article Testing "requirements" Paragraph Above And Satisfactorily Demonstrating 100% Conformance To The Test And Evaluation Elements Cited In The First Article Testing "testing And Evaluation"
paragraph Above Shall Constitute Acceptance Of The First Article;
ii. Failure To Meet Any Of The Conditions In The First Article Testing "requirements" Paragraph Above Or The First Article Testing "testing And Evaluation" Paragraph Above Shall Be Cause For Rejection.
d. Delivery:
i. The Accepted First Article Exhibit May Be Delivered And Counted Along With The Contract Production Quantities Providing The Item Has Not Been Damaged During Testing, And Has Been Found To Be Conforming;
ii. The Contractor Is Responsible For Preparing The First Article Test Report In Accordance With Cdrl's.
3. Production Lot Special Tests: N/a
4. For Purposes Of This Tdr, The Term Ndt Shall Refer To The Following Methods: Mt - Magnetic Particle Testing, Pt - Penetrant Inspection, Ut - Ultrasonic Testing, Rt - Radiographic Testing, And Vt - Visual Testing.
5. Companies Performing Ndt Shall Be Nadcap Accredited, Or A Laboratory Accredited By One Of The Organizations Listed Below As Satisfying Iso 17025 (general Requirements For The Competence Of Testing And Calibration Laboratories). Ndt Certificates Shall Be Bear
the Symbols Of Accreditation And The Accreditation Body.
a. American Association For Laboratory Accreditation (a2la)
b. Ansi National Accreditation Board (anab)
c. International Accreditation Service, Inc (ias)
d. National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (nvlap)
e. Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc (pjla)
f. Canadian Association For Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (cala)
g. Standards Council Of Canada (scc)
4.1 Review Documentation As Provided Under Dd 1423 Requirements.
4.2 The Test To Be Performed Under The First Article Approval Clause (far 52.209-3) Of The Contract Are Listed Below
4.2.1 Dimensional Test (special)
;applies;
4.2.2 Requirements Of:
;lke Drawing Package;
4.2.3 Form
;applies;
4.2.4 Fit
;n/a;
4.2.5 Function
;n/a;
4.2.6 Compliance With Drawing ( ;80020; ) ;6544d025; , Revision ;g; And Specifications Referenced Therein.
4.3 In Addition To The Above Tests, The First Article(s) To Be Inspected Hereunder Shall Also Be Subjected To Those Tests Which Will Demonstrate That The Article(s) Comply With The Contract Requirements
4.4 The Contractor Shall Be Responsible For Providing The Necessary Parts And Repair Of The First Article Sample(s) During Inspection
4.5 The Contractor Shall Notify The Pco, Aco, And Qar Fourteen (14) Days Prior To Conducting The First Article Test So That The Government May Witness Such Testing.
4.5.1 The Qar Shall Be Present To Witness All First Article Testing.
4.5.2 The Following Additional Personnel Shall Witness The First Article Testing: ;roy Janney Nawcadlke Qa / Tel: (732)-323-2834
e-mail: Roy.a.janney.civ@us.navy.mil;
4.6 Disposition Of Fat Samples
4.6.1 ;n/a; Sample(s) May Be Destroyed During Testing.
4.6.2 ;applies; Unless Otherwise Provided For In The Contract, Sample(s) Shall Remain At The Contractor And May Be Considered As Production Items Under The Contract Provided The Sample(s) Can Be Refurbished To Ready For Issue Condition And Provided The
sample(s) Have Inspection Approval Of The Cognizant Dcmc Qar. Sample(s) May Be Shipped As Production Items Only After All Other Units Required Under The Contract Have Been Produced And Are Ready For Shipment.
4.7 Test Sample Coating Instructions
4.7.1 Samples Are To Be Unpainted. Corrosive Areas Are To Be Coated With A Light Preservative If Required.
4.8 Notice To Government Of Testing At The Contractors Facility.
4.8.1 Far 52.209-3 Applies
(a) The Contractor Shall Present ;one; ; Unit(s) Of The Following Cage( ;80020; ; ), Part Number ;6544d025-3; ; , Revision ;g; ; As Specified In This Contract. At Least Fourteen (14) Calendar Days Before The Beginning Of The First Article Testing, The
contractor Shall Notify The Contracting Officer, In Writing, Of The Time And Location Of The Testing So That The Government May Witness The Tests.
(b) The Contractor Shall Submit The First Article Test Report Within 15 Calendar Days From The Date Of Testing To: ;pco; ;
the Contractor Shall Mark The Report "first Article Test Report" And Cite The Contract Number And Lot/item Number. Review Documentation As Provided Under The Dd1423 Requirements.
(c) Within 45 Calendar Days After The Government Inspects The First Article, The Contracting Officer Shall Notify The Contractor, In Writing, Of The Approval, Conditional Approval, Or Disapproval Of The First Article. The Notice Of Approval, Conditional
approval, Or Disapproval Shall Not Relieve The Contractor From Complying With All Requirements Of The Specifications And All Other Terms And Conditions Of This Contract. A Notice Of Conditional Approval Shall State Any Further Action Required Of The
contractor. A Notice Of Disapproval Shall Cite Reasons For Disapproval.
(d) If The First Article Is Disapproved, The Contractor, Upon Government Request Shall Repeat Any Or All First Article Tests. After Each Request For Additional Tests, The Contractor Shall Make Any Necessary Changes, Modifications, Or Repairs To The First
article Or Select Another First Article For Testing. All Costs Related To These Tests Are To Be Borne By The Contractor, Including Any And All Costs For Additional Tests Following A Disapproval. The Contractor Shall Then Conduct The Tests And Deliver Another
report To The Government Under The Terms And Conditions And Within The Time Specified In Paragraph B Above. The Government Reserves The Right To Require An Equitable Adjustment Of The Contract Price For Any Extension Of The Delivery Schedule Or For Any
additional Costs To The Government Related To These Tests.
(e) If The Contractor Fails To Present Any First Article On Time, Or The Contracting Officer Disapproves Any First Article, The Contractor Shall Be Deemed To Have Failed To Make Delivery Within The Meaning Of The Default Clause Of This Contract.
(f) Unless Otherwise Provided In The Contract, And If The Approved First Article Is Not Consumed Or Destroyed In Testing, The Contractor May Deliver The Approved First Article As Part Of The Contract Quantity If It Meets All Contract Requirements For
acceptance.
(g) If The Government Does Not Act Within The Time Specified In Paragraph (c) Above The Contracting Officer, Shall, Upon Timely Written Request From The Contractor, Equitably Adjust Under The Changes Clause Of This Contract The Delivery Or Performance Dates
and/or The Contract Price, And Any Other Contractual Term Affected By The Delay.
(h) Before First Article Approval, The Acquisition Of Materials Or Components For, Or The Commencement Of Production Or, The Balance Of The Contract Quantity Is At The Sole Risk Of The Contractor. Before First Article Approval, The Costs Thereof Shall Not Be
allocated To This Contract For 1) Progress Payments, Or 2) Termination Settlements If The Contract Is Terminated For The Convenience Of The Government. The Contractor Is Responsible For Providing Operating And Maintenance Instructions, Spare Parts, And Repair
of The First Article During Any First Article Test.
(i) The Contractor Shall Produce Both The First Article And The Production Quantity At The Same Facility And Shall Submit A Certification To The Effect With Each First Article.
(j) The Test Report (2 Copies) Shall Be In Accordance With Mil-std-831, Unless Otherwise Specified On The Dd1423, And Shall Be Submitted Via The Cognizant Dcmc To Navsup, Attn: (cite Name And Code In Block 10.a Of The Sf33). The Dcmc Shall Provide Comments On
form Dd1222 (2 Copies) Which Shall Be Forwarded With The Test Report. Approval Of The Test Report Is The Pco's Responsibility. Upon Notification Of Approval, Condition Approval, The Aco Shall Execute The Dd250 To Indicate Government Acceptance Of The Test
report.
4.9 Alternate Offers - Waiver Of First Article Approval Requirements. (the Following Provisions Supersede Any Waiver Of First Article Approval Requirements Terms Set Forth In Clause 52.209-3 Or 52.209-4 As Appropriate)
(a) Unless Otherwise Specified In The Solicitation, Navsup Wss Reserves The Right To Waive The First Article Approval Requirements Specified Herein For Offerors Who Have Previously Furnished Identical Production Articles Accepted By The Government Or The
original Equipment Manufacturer/prime Manufacturer. An Offeror Requesting Waiver Of First Article Requirements Shall Submit Evidence With Its Offer Establishing That:
(i) The Last Production Unit Was Delivered Within Three (3) Years Of The Issue Date Of This Solicitation, And
(ii) The Production Location To Be Used For This Requirement Is The Same As Used For The Previous Production Run.
additionally, The Offeror Shall Submit A Certification, To Be Executed By The Officer Or Employee For The Offer, Stating That:
(i) The Articles To Be Provided Will Be Produced Using The Same Facilities, Processes, Sequences Of Operations And Approved Subcontractors As Those Previously Delivered And Accepted By The Government Or The Original Equipment Manufacturer/prime Manufacturer,
and
(ii) The Previous Production Units Were Manufactured Without Material Review Board Disposition Or Waiver/deviation Request Or Rejection Of Pre-production Samples For Cause.
(note: This Certification Concerns A Matter Within The Jurisdiction Of An Agency Of The United States And The Making Of A False, Fictitious, Or Fraudulent Certification May Render The Maker Subject To Prosecution Under Title 18, United States
code, Section 1001.)
(b) Offerors Requesting Waiver Of First Article Approval Requirements Under The Provisions Of This Clause Are Cautioned To Submit Two Prices For Articles Required Herein - One That Is Based On Compliance With The First Article Approval Requirements And
one That Is Based On A Waiver Of Such Requirements. Where An Offeror Submits Only One Price And Fails To Clearly State That The Price Is Based On Waiver Of The First Article Approval Requirements It Will Be Deemed To Be Based On Compliance With The First
article Approval Requirements
(c) In The Event Of The First Article Approval Requirement Is Granted, The Delivery Schedule For The Production Items Shall Be Reduced By The Number Of Days Designated For Delivery Of First Article Test Unit Plus The Number Of Calendar Days Indicated For The
government Notification Of Conditional Approval Or Approval. These Requirements Are Specified In The Quality Assurance Section Of This Solicitation. If The Offeror Is Unable To Meet The Desired Schedule, He Shall Insert Below The Alternate Delivery Schedule
he Offers To The Government.
Offeror's Proposed Alternate Delivery Schedule
(based On Waiver Of First Article Approval Requirements)
within Days:
item No. _____________ Quantity:_______ After Date Of Contract:_________
4.10 . Mandatory Inspection Requirements:
100% Procurement Contracting Officer (pco) Mandatory Inspection Is Required And Shall Be Accomplished At Source Under The Surveillance And Final Approval Of The Cognizant Dcmao Quality Assurance Representative (qar).
during Production, Mandatory Inspection Is Required To Be Accomplished By The Contractor As Follows:
A. Level Of Inspection (loi).
1. Critical Characteristics: 100% Inspection Shall Apply.
2. Major And Minor Characteristics: Loi Shall Be In Accordance With A Sampling Plan Acceptable To The Qar.
B. Critical Characteristics:
;roy Janney Nawcadlke Qa / Tel: (732)-323-2834
e-mail: Roy.a.janney.civ@us.navy.mil;
C. Major And Minor Characteristics
1. Shall Be Defined By The Contractor Subject To Qar Concurrence, Unless Defined On Applicable Drawings And Associated Specifications.
4.11 Special Inspection Requirements
( ;n/a; ) Magnetic Particle Inspection
( ;n/a; ) Surface Inspection
( ;n/a; ) Penetrant Inspection
( ;n/a; ) Radiographic Inspection
( ;n/a; ) Ultrsonic Inspection
( ;applies; ) High Shock Test
( ;applies; ) Mechanical Vibration Test
4.12 Final Inspection Requirement:due To The Critical Nature Of This Item, Representatives Of The Buying
office/and The Cognizant Field Activity, Nawc Lakehurst, Shall Be Notified By The Successful Contractor At Least 14 Days Prior To Presentation To The Dcm Qar Of The Items For Final Inspection So That They May Have The Option Of
witnessing The Final Inspection. The Contractor Shall Notify By Email Or
telefax Pco And Nawc Lakehurst Qa ;roy Janney Nawcadlke Qa / Tel: (732)-323-2834
e-mail: Roy.a.janney.civ@us.navy.mil; To Arrange For The Final Inspection.the Authority Of The Qar Shall Not Be Abrogated. If The Notification Is Not Given To Both Sites Then The Qar Shall Not Accept The Units.
5. Packaging- Mil-std 2073 Packaging Applies As Found Elsewhere In The Schedule
6. Notes - Not Applicable
this Is An Alre Critical Application Item. For Drawing Updates, See Attached Nawc Lke Drawing Update Sheet.
navsup Reference Only: Procurement Tdr (24-10083)
The Components Being Acquired Under This Solicitation Have Been Classified As "critical" Requiring Engineering Source Approval By Naval Air Systems Command. Only Those Companies Who Have Submitted And Been Approved Will Be Eligible For Award Under This
solicitation. Any Company May Submit A Source Approval Request As Outlined In This Solicitation.
\
date Of First Submission=asreq
16 Remarks
(block 12) Concurrently With Delivery Of Fat Items.
inspection/certification Data Needed To Substantiate The Quality Ofthe First Article Test Unit Shall Be Included In First Article Unit Packaging. The Outside Of The Package That Contains The Data Shall Be Clearly Marked "inspection/certification Data Included".
data Requirements:
a. Copies Of All Approved Requests For Variations.
b. Identification Per Drawing 6544d025.
c. Hydraulic Requirements Per Drawing 6544d025.
d. Electrical Requirements Per Drawing 6544d025.
e. Shock And Vibration Requirements Per Drawing 6544d025.
f. Dimensional Inspection Per Drawing 6544d025.
g. Acceptance Test Per Drawing 6544d025.
date Of First Submission=asreq
16. Remarms:
(block 12) Concurrently With Final Inspection.
data Requirements:
a. Copies Of All Approved Requests For Variations.
b. Identification Per Drawing 6544d025.
c. Hydraulic Requirements Per Drawing 6544d025.
d. Electrical Requirements Per Drawing 6544d025.
e. Coating Per Drawing 6544d025.
f. Shock And Vibration Requirements Per Drawing 6544d025.
g. Dimensional Inspection Per Drawing 6544d025.
h. Acceptance Test Per Drawing 6544d025.
Closing Date6 Feb 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION USA Tender
Solid Waste Management
United States
Details: Combined Synopsis/solicitationmilford Hazardous Waste Removal(i) this Is A Combined Synopsis/solicitation For Commercial Items Prepared In Accordance With The Format In Far Subpart 12.6, As Supplemented With Additional Information Included In This Notice And In Accordance With The Simplified Acquisition Procedures Authorized In Far Part 13. This Announcement Constitutes The Only Solicitation; Quotes Are Being Requested And A Written Solicitation Will Not Be Issued.(ii) this Solicitation Is Issued As A Request For Quotation (rfq). Submit Written Quotes On Rfq Number 1305m325q0063.(iii) the Solicitation Document And Incorporated Provisions And Clauses Are Those In Effect Through Federal Acquisition Circular 2025-03 (jan 2025).(iv) this Solicitation Is Being Issued As A Total Small Business Set-aside. The Associated Naics Code Is 562211. The Small Business Size Standard Is $47 Million. (v) this Combined Solicitation/synopsis Is For Purchase Of The Following Commercial Services:clin 0001services, Non-personal, To Provide All Labor, Equipment And Materials (unless Otherwise Provided Herein) Necessary For Milford Hazardous Waste Removal At The Milford Connecticut Laboratory In Milford, Ct, In Accordance With The Statement Of Work. Period Of Performance Date Of Award Through 45 Days.(vi) description Of Requirements Is As Follows:see Attached Statement Of Work, And Department Of Labor Wage Rates: Wd 2015-4131, Revision No. 30, Dated 12/23/2024, Which Can Be Found On: Https://sam.gov/content/wage-determinations(vii) date(s) And Place(s) Of Delivery And Acceptance:period Of Performance Shall Be: Date Of Award Through 45 Days.place Of Performance Is 212 Rogers Avenue, Milford, Ct 06460-6499.(viii) Far Provision 52.212-1, Instructions To Offerors-commercial Products And Commercial Services (sept 2023), Applies To This Acquisition And Can Be Found On The Request For Quote Form Sf1449 Attachment.(ix) Far Provision 52.212-2, Evaluation-commercial Products And Commercial Services (nov 2021), Applies To This Acquisition And Can Be Found On The Request For Quote Form Sf1449 Attachment.(x) Far Provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations And Certifications-commercial Products And Commercial Services (may 2024), Applies To This Acquisition And Can Be Found On The Request For Quote Form Sf1449 Attachment. Offerors Are Advised To Include A Completed Copy Of The Provision With Its Offer.(xi) Far Clause At 52.212-4, Contract Terms And Conditions-commercial Products And Commercial Services (nov 2023), Applies To This Acquisition And Can Be Found On The Request For Quote Form Sf1449 Attachment. (xii) Far Clause At 52.212-5, Contract Terms And Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or Executive Orders-commercial Products And Commercial Services (jan 2025), Applies To This Acquisition And Can Be Found In Full Text On The Request For Quote Form Sf1449 Attachment. (xiii) Any Additional Contract Requirement(s) Or Terms And Conditions That Apply Can Be Found On The Request For Quote Form Sf1449 Attachment. (xiv) Defense Priorities And Allocations System (dpas) And Assigned Rating Does Not Apply.(xv) Quotes Are Required To Be Received In The Contracting Office No Later Than 12:00pm Mst/mdt On February 14th 2025. All Quotes Must Be Submitted Electronically Via Email To Jamie.rosales@noaa.gov.(xvi) Any Questions Regarding This Solicitation Should Be Submitted Electronically Via Email To Jamie.rosales@noaa.gov.utilization Of Fedconnect® For Contract Administrationthe Department Of Commerce Will Utilize The Fedconnect® Web Portal In Administering This Award. The Contractor Must Be Registered In Fedconnect® And Have Access To The Fedconnect® Website Located At Https://www.fedconnect.net/fedconnect/. For Assistance In Registering Or For Other Fedconnect® Questions Please Call The Fedconnect® Help Desk At (800) 899-6665 Or Email At Support@fedconnect.net. There Is No Charge For Registration In Or Use Of Fedconnect®.(end)1352.215-72 Inquiries (apr 2010)offerors Must Submit All Questions Concerning This Solicitation In Writing Via Email To Jamie.rosales@noaa.gov. Questions Should Be Received No Later Than February 12th 2025. Any Responses To Questions Will Be Made In Writing, Without Identification Of The Questioner, And Will Be Included In An Amendment To The Solicitation. Even If Provided In Other Form, Only The Question Responses Included In The Amendment To The Solicitation Will Govern Performance Of The Contract.(end Of Clause)52.237-1 Site Visit (apr 1984)offerors Or Quoters Are Urged And Expected To Inspect The Site Where Services Are To Be Performed And To Satisfy Themselves Regarding All General And Local Conditions That May Affect The Cost Of Contract Performance, To The Extent That The Information Is Reasonably Obtainable. In No Event Shall Failure To Inspect The Site Constitute Grounds For A Claim After Contract Award.(end Of Provision)a Site Visit Is Highly Recommended But Not Required. Offerors Are Urged And Expected To Inspect The Site Where Services Are To Be Performed And To Satisfy Themselves Regarding All General And Local Conditions That May Affect The Cost Of Contract Performance, To The Extent That The Information Is Reasonably Obtainable. In No Event Shall Failure To Inspect The Site Constitute Grounds For A Claim After Contract Award. Please Contact Jeffrey Hrzic At Jeffrey.hrzic@noaa.gov To Set Up A Time To Visit The Site. All Questions During The Site Visit Should Be Submitted Electronically To Jamie.rosales@noaa.gov.far 52.212-1 Instructions To Offerors-commercial Products And Commercial Services (sep 2023)notice To Offerors: Instructions For Submitting Quotations Under This Request For Quote Must Be Followed. Failure To Provide All Information To Aid In The Evaluation May Be Considered Non-responsive. Offers That Are Non-responsive May Be Excluded From Further Evaluation And Rejected Without Further Notification To The Offeror.1. Submit Pdf Or Microsoft Word Format Quotations To The Office Specified In This Solicitation At Or Before The Time Specified In The Solicitation. Quote Documents Shall Include Signed Copies Of The Sf 18 And Sf 30(s) To Acknowledge The Solicitation And Any Applicable Amendments. Email Quotes Are Required And Can Be Sent To Jamie.rosales@noaa.gov. 2. Offeror Shall Have An Active Registration In The System For Award Management (sam Found At Https://sam.gov/content/home) In Order To Provide A Quote And Be Eligible For Award. Must Provide Their Ueid/cage Code With Their Quote. 3. Offerors Shall Assume That The Government Has No Prior Knowledge Of Them Or Their Capability.4. Offerors Must Provide All Evaluation Criteria In Accordance With Far 52.212-2. Offerors Who Do Not Provide All Evaluation Criteria May Not Be Considered.5. Quote Shall Include At Least Two References For Similar Services Including The Phone Number, Full Address, And E-mail Address. References Will Be Checked. The Government Will Use Its Discretion To Determine The Sources Of Past Performance Information Used In The Evaluation, And The Information May Be Obtained From References Provided By The Offeror, The Agency’s Knowledge Of Contractor Performance, Other Government Agencies Or Commercial Entities, Or Past Performance Databases, And Will Be Based On Responsiveness, Quality, And Customer Services. The Following Minimum Information Shall Be Provided Within Contractor Submitted References:• Contract Number/order Number• Date Of Contract Award• Name And Address Of The Government Agency Or Commercial Entity• Contract Type• Annual Contract Cost• Period Of Performance• Description Of Work• Valid Name, Phone Number And E-mail Address Of Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Representative Or Prime Contractor (if Company Was Subcontracted).• In The Description Of Work, Quotes Should Provide A Detailed Explanation Demonstrating The Similarity Of The Contract, In Terms Of Scope And Size To The Requirements Of The Solicitation For Purposes Of The Relevancy Review. Additionally, Offerors Should Provide A Brief Description Of Work Performed And Results Achieved; Description Of The Methodology, Tools, And Processes Utilized.in Addition To The Information Requested Above, Offerors Shall Complete Blocks 1 Through 4 On Page 1 Of The Past Performance Questionnaire. The Offeror Is Required To Send The Past Performance Questionnaire To Those Government And Commercial Activities Provided By The Offeror In Their Submission And E-mail The Completed Survey Form Directly To Jamie Rosales At Jamie.rosales@noaa.gov By The Due Date Of This Solicitation.the Government Reserves The Right To Consider Past Performance Report Forms Received After The Due Date Of The Solicitation And To Contact References For Verification Or Additional Information. Vendors Are Cautioned That The Government Reserves The Right To Obtain Information For Use In The Evaluation Of Past Performance From Any Sources Including Sources Outside Of The Government. The Government May Obtain Whatever Information It Deems Mostrelevant To The Required Effort By Telephonic And/or Written Inquiry. This Information May Include Sam.gov Information, Or Past Performance Information From Any Source.6. If Proposed Subcontractor Past Performance Is Provided As Part Of The Two (2) Of Its Most Relevant Contracts Or Efforts And Type Of Work To Be Done By The Subcontractor On The Solicitation Requirement Must Be Stated. The Offeror’s Submittal Shall Clearly Detail The Aspects Of The Work In The Solicitation That The Subcontractor Is Proposed To Perform. A Past Performance Example Which Does Not Clearly Detail The Aspects Of The Work In The Solicitation That The Subcontractor Is Proposed To Perform Will Not Be Evaluated.if The Prime Offeror Or Intended Subcontractor/partner Submits A Past Performance Example In Which It Served As A Subcontractor, The Prime/sub/partner Shall Clearly Detail The Work That It Performed And The Size (dollar Value) Of That Subcontracted Work Only. A Past Performance Example That Does Not Differentiate Between The Overall Contract Effort And The Subcontractor Effort Will Not Be Evaluated.subcontractor Performance (either The Vendor's Own Subcontractor Experience Or Proposed Subcontractor’sexperience) Of Major Or Critical Aspects Of This Requirement Will Be Considered The Same As Prime Contractor Past Performance Information For The Vendor. Failure Of Offerors To Provide The Required Information And Level Of Specificity Will Result In The Contract Reference Not Being Evaluated.the Government Does Not Accept Responsibility For Non-receipt Of Quotes. It Is The Contractor’s Responsibility To Request And Receive A Confirmation Of The Quote Receipt.far 52.212-2 Evaluation- Commercial Products And Commercial Services (nov 2021) Offers Will Be Evaluated Based On Price And The Factors Set Forth In Paragraph (a). The Evaluation Will Consider The Non-price Technical Solution (technical Approach And Past Performance) To Be Significantly More Important Than Price. However, As Quotes Are Determined To Be More Equal In The Non-price Evaluation Factor, Price Becomes More Important And May Become The Determining Factor For Award. If, At Any Stage Of The Evaluation, All Vendors Are Determined To Have Submitted Equal, Or Virtually Equal, Non-price Technical Solutions, Price Could Become The Factor In Determining Which Vendor Will Receive The Award.the Government Intends To Evaluate The Quotes And Award A Purchase Order Based On The Offeror’s Initial Quote; Therefore, The Offeror’s Initial Quote Should Contain The Offeror’s Best Terms From A Non-price Technical Solution And Price Standpoint. The Government Reserves The Right Not To Award A Purchase Order Depending On The Quality Of The Quote(s) Submitted And The Availability Of Funds. Furthermore, The Government May Waive Informalities And Minor Irregularities Or Omissions In Quotes Received.the Government May Make Award To Other Than The Lowest-priced Offeror Or The Offeror With The Highest Technical Rating If The Contracting Officer Determines That To Do So Would Result In The Best Value To The Government. The Government Will Not Make An Award At A Significantly Higher Overall Price To Achieve Only Slightly Superior Performance Capability. (a) The Government Will Award A Contract Resulting From This Solicitation To The Responsible Offeror Whose Offer Conforming To The Solicitation Will Be Most Advantageous To The Government, Price And Other Factors Considered. Paragraph (a) Is Hereby Completed As Follows: Evaluation Factors Are Listed In Order Of Importance And All Factors Are More Important Than Price.1. technical Approach And Capability. The Offeror’s Overall Technical Approach Will Be Evaluated To Assess The Government's Level Of Confidence In The Offeror’s Understanding Of, Approach To, And Ability To Successfully Perform The Requirements As Described In The Statement Of Work. Provide A Detailed Description Of The Company’s Experience Performing Similar Services. A Detailed Technical Approach Write-up Describing How The Offeror Will Perform This Service Is Required To Be Submitted With The Quote Regardless Of Whether A Site Visit Was Made Or Not. The Technical Approach Write-up Must Not Be A Reiteration Of The Statement Of Work, But How Your Company Plans On Performing The Tasks Listed In The Attached Statement Of Work. (i.e. Performance Checklists, Anticipated Number Of Employees, Anticipated Hours At The Facility And/or Confirmation Of Supplies Being Provided, Etc.)2. past Performance. Quote Shall Include At Least Two References From At Least Two Separate Contracts For Similar And Relevant Recent Services Within The Past Two Years Including The Name, Phone Number, Full Address, And E-mail Address Of The Reference To Demonstrate The Offeror’s Capability To Successfully Perform The Services Listed In The Statement Of Work. The Offeror Is Required To Fill Out Blocks 1-4 And Send The Attached Past Performance Questionnaire To The References Provided By The Offeror In Their Submission, And Email The Completed Survey Form Directly To Jamie.rosales@noaa.gov By The Closing Date And Time Of This Solicitation. The Government Reserves The Right To Consider Past Performance Report Forms Received After The Due Date And Time Of The Solicitation, Past Performance Questionnaires Submitted From Previous Solicitations, And To Contact References For Verification Or Additional Information.the Offeror's Past Performance On Related Contracts Will Be Evaluated To Determine, As Appropriate, Successful Performance Of Contract Requirements, Quality And Timeliness Of Delivery Of Goods And Services, Cost Management, Communications Between Contracting Parties, Proactive Management And Customer Satisfaction. The Government Will Use Its Discretion To Determine The Sources Of Past Performance Information Used In The Evaluation, And The Information May Be Obtained From References Provided By The Offeror, The Agency’s Knowledge Of Offeror Performance, Other Government Agencies Or Commercial Entities, Or Past Performance Databases, And Will Be Based On Responsiveness, Quality, And Customer Services. Offerors Lacking Relevant Past Performance History, Or For Whom Past Performance Information Is Either Not Available Or Has Not Been Submitted To The Government, Will Receive A Neutral Rating For Past Performance. A Good Past Performance Rating Provides Higher Confidence Than A Neutral Or Satisfactory Rating.3. offeror Must Be Certified, Licensed And Permitted (federal And State) For Transportation, Removal And Disposal Of Hazardous Material. Offeror Must Provide Proof Of Certification, Licensure And Permits. Offeror Must Provide Proof Of Subcontractor’s Licensure, Certification And Permits. 4. price. The Government Will Evaluate The Price Quote For Completeness And Reasonableness In Relation To The Rfq Requirements. Quoted Prices Must Be Entirely Compatible With The Non-price Technical Solution.the Government Intends To Award A Trade-off, Single Firm Fixed-price Purchase Order On An All Or None Basis With Payment Terms Of Net 30. (b) Options. The Government Will Evaluate Offers For Award Purposes By Adding The Total Price For All Options To The Total Price For The Basic Requirement. The Government May Determine That An Offer Is Unacceptable If The Option Prices Are Significantly Unbalanced. Evaluation Of Options Shall Not Obligate The Government To Exercise The Option(s).(c) A Written Notice Of Award Or Acceptance Of An Offer, Mailed Or Otherwise Furnished To The Successful Offeror Within The Time For Acceptance Specified In The Offer, Shall Result In A Binding Contract Without Further Action By Either Party. Before The Offer’s Specified Expiration Time, The Government May Accept An Offer (or Part Of An Offer), Whether Or Not There Are Negotiations After Its Receipt, Unless A Written Notice Of Withdrawal Is Received Before Award.(end Of Provision)
Closing Date14 Feb 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
Soil And Land Use Survey Of India Tender
Goods
Electrical Goods and Equipments...+1Electrical and Electronics
GEM
Corrigendum : Closing Date Modified
India
Purchaser Name: Soil And Land Use Survey Of India | CATEGORY: Split Air Conditioner Including Green AC, Wall Mount Type
(V2) (Q2)
Closing Date17 Jan 2025
Tender AmountINR 217.7 K (USD 2.5 K)
This is an estimated amount, exact amount may vary.
Soil And Land Use Survey Of India Tender
Auction
Scraps
MSTC
India
Purchaser Name: Soil And Land Use Survey Of India | Auction Sale Of Lot No : 1 Lot Name : Condemned Vehicle With Rc Mahindra Jeep Wagonetee Fgb Reg No Gj 01 G 2884 , Lot No : 2 Lot Name : Condemned Vehicle With Rc Mahindra Bolero Lx Bsii Reg No Mh 31 Ag 9706 ,
Closing Date4 Feb 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
7421-7430 of 7629 archived Tenders