Fair Work Commission Australia Tender

Suppliers Must Respond To Each Of The Following Evaluation Criteria For The Customer To Assess The Most Suitable Provider To Undertake The Request Services: 1.1 Criteria One: Potential Suppliers’ Experience 30% Please Provide Details Of Demonstrated Capability Of The Potential Supplier In Providing Similar Or Related Services In Part 4 Of The Suppliers’ Responses. 1.2 Criteria Two: Experience And Availability Of Specified Personnel/subcontractors 30% Please Nominate Specified Personnel And Any Subcontractors Proposed For The Requested Services, Together With Their Availability To Provide The Services And A Summary Of Their Skills, Qualifications And Experience In Part 4 Of The Supplier’s Responses. 1.3 Criteria Three: Project Plan 40% Please Submit A Project Plan Detailing The Proposed Methodology And Timetable For The Provision Of The Requested Services, Together With Any Perceived Risks That May Affect The Delivery Of Those Services And A Strategy To Mitigate Those Risks In Part 3 Of The Supplier’s Responses. 1.4 Criteria Four: Pricing  Please Submit A Total Price And Complete Part 5 Of The Supplier’s Responses 1.5 Conflict Of Interest Please Advise Whether Any Real Or Apparent Conflict Of Interest Exists Or Is Likely To Arise During The Performance Of The Requested Services, And If So, What That Conflict Is In Part 4 Of The Supplier’s Responses. The Supplier Will Provide Useful And Relevant Commentary To The End User About The Purpose Of The Features Of The Model Rules.  The Supplier Can Provide Commentary Either By Annotating The Model Rules, By Referring To A Separate Caselaw Benchbook Which The Supplier Will Also Provide, Or Both.  The Annotations And/or Benchbook Will Include Appropriate Authorities And/or Previous Decisions.   Where Appropriate, The Annotated Rules / Benchbook Can Use Existing Certified Rule(s) Of A Registered Organisation Where The Supplier Believes That The Rule Is A Fit-for-purpose Example That May Be Informative To The End User. The Model Rules Should Be In Plain Language, Clear And Easy To Understand (including In The Day-to-day Operation Of Registered Organisations That Adopt Some Or All Of The Model Rules). The Model Rules Should Utilise Behavioural Insights About How People Learn And Use Information To Make The Document Easy To Understand And Use. The Model Rules Must Model Best Practice; High Standards Of Accountability For Organisations And Their Officers To Their Members; Provide For The Democratic Functioning And Control Of Organisations; And Seek To Embed Within Organisations A Culture Of Good Governance. The Model Rules Must Be Compatible With, Refer To And Consider The Approach To The Publication Of Model Rules By The Australian Electoral Commissioner, Including The Aec Model Rules Guide. The Model Rules Must Comply With And Not Be Contrary To The Fair Work (registered Organisations) Act 2009, The Fair Work Act 2009, Modern Awards And Enterprise Agreements, And Not Be Otherwise Contrary To Law.