DEPT OF THE NAVY USA Tender

Important Information For Interested Parties: this Notice Of Intent Is Not A Request For Competitive Proposals. However, Responsible, Interested Parties May Identify Their Interest And Capability By Responding To This Notice. The Government Will Consider All Information Received Prior To The Closing Date Of This Notice. A Determination By The Government Not To Compete This Proposed Contract Based Upon Responses To This Notice Is Solely Within The Discretion Of The Government. There Are No Commitments By The Government To Issue Any Solicitations, Make An Award Or Awards, Or To Be Responsible For Any Monies Expended By Any Interested Parties Before Award Of A Contract For The Efforts Mentioned Above. Information Provided Herein Is Subject To Change And In No Way Binds The Government To Solicit For Or Award A Contract. No Telephone Responses Will Be Accepted. this Is Not A Request For Proposal. It Does Not Constitute A Solicitation And Shall Not Be Construed As A Commitment By The Government. Responses In Any Form Are Not Offers And The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. No Funds Are Available To Pay For Preparation Of Responses To This Announcement. Any Information Submitted By Respondents To This Technical Description Is Strictly Voluntary. this Request For Information Is A Market Research Tool Being Used In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 15.2 To Determine Potential And Eligible Businesses Capable Of Providing The Services Described Herein. 1.0 Introduction the Naval Air Systems Command (navairsyscom) Program Executive Office, Unmanned Aviation And Strike Weapons, Peo(u&w), Pma-263, At Patuxent River, Maryland, Announces Its Intention To Broaden Industry Partnership And To Procure, On A Competitive Basis, Coco Services Necessary To Provide Uas Isr Services For The Navy And Marine Corps Small Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Systems (stuas) Program Office (pma-263) In Support Of The Department Of Defense (dod) And Other Government Agencies (oga).these Services Will Support Domestic And Coalition Military Partners In Combat And Contingency Operations. Currently, These Services Are Being Delivered Under Performance-based Basic Ordering Agreements (boas) Issued In March 2021 To Insitu, Inc. Of Bingen Wa, And Textron Systems Of Hunt Valley Md, For Land-based And Sea-based Isr Services. The Existing Boas, N0001921g0007 And N0001921g0008, Respectively, Are Firm-fixed-price Type And Expire March 2026. Detailed Information On The Existing Boas Can Be Obtained Via The Following Website: Https://www.navair.navy.mil/foia. This Request For Information Is Issued With The Intent To Award Boa(s) To Onboard Additional Qualified Vendor(s) To Compete For Future Isr Coco Services. 2.0 Objective pma-263 Is Seeking To Identify Additional Contractors Capable Of Providing Coco Isr Services In Support Of Dod, Oga, And Combat And Contingency Operational Requirements. This Request For Information Is Related To Support For Land-based And Sea-based Operations To Provide Reliable Delivery Of Sensor Data. Contractors Would Be Responsible For Resources To Produce Sensor Data, Such As Trained Personnel, Non-developmental Uas Equipment, Certifications, Operation And Maintenance, Spares And Product Support. Contracted Services Would Be In Direct Support Of Isr Missions Requiring Around The Clock Imagery And Other Sensor Capability In Support Of Those Missions. Contractors Shall Be Capable Of Providing Isr Services On A Normal And Surge Basis, Day And Night, 24 Hours A Day, Seven Days A Week. Pre-deployment, Deployment, And Post-deployment Support Would Be Required, And Would Entail Execution Of A Variety Of Responsibilities Inherent To Execution Of Such Support, Including But Not Limited To, Equipment Transportation, Export Control Licensing, Insurance, Personnel Travel, Processing For Overseas Movement And Accountability, Visa Coordination, Compliance With Requirements At Dfars 252.225-7040, Compliance With Dodi 3020.41, Etc. 3.0 Requirements pma-263 Is Specifically Interested In Uas Isr Services Capable Of The Following Performance Parameters. The Following Parameters Constitute Mandatory Minimum Requirements: technology Readiness Level (trl): Trl 8 Per Dod Deskbook 5000.2 operational Range: At Least 75 Nautical Miles (nm) From The Ground Control Station Located At The Launch Site, With A Single Air Vehicle, For Both Sea-based And Land-based Uas Operations datalink Range (communications And Full Motion Video (fmv)): Line-of-sight With Type-1 Encryption Utilizing The Bandwidth Efficient Common Data Link (be-cdl) Waveform on Station Time: 10 Hours Time-on-station (tos) At Maximum Range simultaneous, Multi-intelligence (multi-int) Capable With Fmv Sensor(s) And An Electronic Warfare (ew) Type Sensor Or Wide Area Maritime Search (wams) Sensor fmv: Electro Optic (eo)/ Infrared (ir) – National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale (niirs) Of Level 8.4 Or Above For Eo And 7.2 Or Above For Ir When Taken From The Uav At An Altitude Of 3,000 Feet Above Ground Level (agl) At A 45-degree Slant Range global Positioning System (gps) Precise Positioning Service (pps) Receiver operate In Gps-contested-/degraded Situations (uas Shall Be Capable Of Continued Navigation In A Gps-contested Environment Up To A Minimum 74db For All Phases Of Flight) operate In Adverse Weather Conditions And Austere Environments runway Independent for Land-based Operations, The Air Vehicle (av) Shall Operate On Commonly Available Fuels At Forward-deployed Locations, Such As Mil-dtl-5624, Grade Jp-4/jp-5; Mil-dtl-83133 Grade Jp-8/jp-8+100; Astm D910, Aviation Gasoline Grade 100ll; And Their Equivalent Nato And Commercial Versions. For Ship-based Operations, The Av Shall Operate On Mil-dtl- 5624, Grade Jp-4/jp-5. in Accordance With Dodi 8510.01, Obtain An Authorization To Operate (ato) From The Navair Function Authorization Official (fao) (ato With Provision (ato-p), Or Reciprocity Ato Inherited From Another Dod Service Branch Are Acceptable. meet The Ndaa2023 Section 817 Requirements For Country Of Origin Of Uas And Critical Components. submission Of A Data Package That Contains Engineering Data Necessary To Support A Category 3 Interim Flight Clearance (ifc) In Accordance With Navairinst 13034.1, Airworthiness Policy. sensors Output Stanag 4545, 4607, And 4676 Messages 4.0 Requested Information interested Vendors Should Submit A Brief Capability Statement Package (not To Exceed 15 Pages) Demonstrating Ability To Perform The Services Based On The Parameters In Paragraph 3.0. The Response Shall Contain The Respondent’s Primary Point Of Contact With Phone Number And Email Address. the Capabilities Statement Package Should Include But Not Limited To The Following Information: 4.1 Company Profile/status: 4.1.1 What Is Your Experience And Maturity (a) With Manufacturing And Developing Unmanned Aircraft System Products And (b) With Providing Isr Services? 4.1.2 Provide Your Cage Code, Unique Entity Identifier Number, Current Number Of Employees, Annual Revenue History, Office Location(s), The Respondent’s Web Page Url, And A Statement Regarding Current Small Or Large Business Status Based On The Designated Naics Code. 4.1.3 What Is The Technology Readiness Level (trl) Of Your Candidate Uas As Described In The Dod Technology Readiness Assessment Handbook? 4.1.4 Is The Uas Currently Available On One Or More Gsa Schedules? If So, Which One(s)? 4.1.5 Did You Receive Funding To Develop Your Uas From A Government Agency? 4.2 Uas Operating Parameters/configuration: 4.2.1 Describe How The Uas Satisfies The Minimum Requirements Stated In Paragraph 3.0 Above. In Addition, Describe The Following: 4.2.1.1 System’s Anti-jam Capabilities. 4.2.1.2 System’s Alternative Positioning, Navigation, And Timing (apnt) Solutions Capabilities In A Degraded/contested Gps Environment. 4.2.1.3 System’s Weather Limitations To Include But Not Limited To Ice, Rain, And Wind. 4.2.1.4 System’s Environmental Limitations (altitude, Temperature, Etc). 4.2.1.4.1 System’s Level Of Compliance With Mil-std-461g. 4.2.1.4.2 System’s Level Of Compliance With Mil-dtl-901e (grade B). 4.2.1.4.3 System’s Design Criteria With Respect To Minimizing Radar Cross Section (rcs). 4.2.1.5 System’s Ability To Remain Visually And Audibly Non-detectable At Operating Altitude. 4.2.1.6 Data Link Used Including Waveform, Operational Frequency Band, Analog Or Digital, And Encryption Capabilities. 4.2.1.7 Data Link Range At Different Operating Altitudes. 4.2.1.8 How Ground Control Station Communicates With The Air Vehicle Should The System Be Operating In A Beyond Line Of Sight (blos) Situation. 4.2.1.9 How Is The Air Vehicle Launched And Recovered? 4.2.1.9.1 How Many Launches, Recoveries, And Total Flight Hours Have Been Successfully Accomplished For This Configuration? 4.2.1.10 Describe How Ship-based Operations Would Occur To Include Launch And Recovery Profiles And Ship Infrastructure Requirements. 4.2.1.11 Describe Staffing Requirements At The Organizational Level. 4.2.1.11.1 How Many People Are Required To Operate The Uas? 4.2.1.11.2 How Many People Are Required To Maintain The Uas? 4.2.1.12 A Field Packed System Is Defined As Having All The Required Equipment To Accomplish A Mission And Be In A State Safe To Be Transported. How Long Does It Take To Go From A Field Packed System To Air Vehicle Launch? 4.2.1.13 Provide Data Supporting That The Uas Has Been Tested In A Relevant Operational Environment, Including Day And Night Video, If Available. 4.2.1.14 Has The Uas Conducted Field User Evaluations For The U.s. Government? If So, Please Provide The Following: 4.2.1.14.1 Applicable (unclassified) Results As To What Was Demonstrated 4.2.1.14.2 Any Changes Since The Demonstration, As Relevant To This Rfi 4.2.1.14.3 U. S. Government Point Of Contact. 4.2.1.15 What Software Operating System Does The Uas Use? Was The Software Developed And Coded In The U.s.? Does The Operating Software Interface With Dod Software And Dod Mapping Imagery Software Or Does It Require Company Proprietary Software To Operate The System? 4.2.1.16 How Does The Uas Download And Store Data Through The Ground Control Station And For How Long? 4.2.1.17 Is The Uas Controlled Under The International Traffic In Arms Regulations (itar)? 4.2.1.18 Do You Have An Export Configuration? If So, Please Describe The Export Configuration. 4.2.1.19 Has Critical Program Information (cpi) Or Critical Technology (as Defined In The Dodi 5200.39) That Requires Anti-tamper Protection And/or Low Observable Requirements Been Identified For The Uas? (unclassified Responses Only) 4.3 Training And Field Support: 4.3.1 Describe Any Other Ancillary Equipment That Is Not Included As Part Of The System Configuration, Such As Calibration Equipment. 4.3.2 Indicate Whether There Are Existing Operational And Maintenance Publications Or Manuals. 4.3.3 Provide The Uas’s Sparing Requirements Based On 9,000 Flight-hours Per Year Per Site For Land-based Isr Services And 2,400 Flight-hours Per Year For Ship-based Isr Services. 4.3.4 Describe The Uas’s Facility And Infrastructure Requirements At A Fielded Site. 4.3.5 Describe Continental United States (conus) And Outside The Continental United States (oconus) Field Support On The Uas While Deployed To Include Harsh Or Hostile Environments Overseas. 4.3.6 Describe The Existing Training Curriculum (course Type Classes, Devices, Duration, Training Location And Any Certification Requirement Timelines). 4.3.7 Provide Any Other System Features That The Uas Has That Are Unique And Stand Out From Other System Platforms. 4.4 Cybersecurity Support 4.4.1 Describe Whether The System Has Undergone A Dod Sanctioned Ato Or Iatt Using The Risk Management Framework (rmf) Process Prescribed In Dodi 8510.01. 4.4.2 Does The System Have An Active Ato/iatt From A Dod Service Branch? If So, Which Branch? 4.4.3 Can Artifacts Be Provided To Support A Navy/navair Ato? 4.4.4 Is The Service Branch Ao Possessing The Ato Amenable To Supporting A Reciprocity Ato And Engaging In A Memorandum Of Agreement With Navair? 4.4.5 Describe The Current Processes That You Have Implemented To Ensure The System Meets The Information Security Requirements Established Within The Nist 800-53 Sp Framework. 4.4.6 Has The System Undergone Cybersecurity Test And Evaluation? 4.4.7 Is There A Network Architectural Diagram For The System? If So, Does This Include Component/subcomponent Interfaces, Information Flow, Ports, Protocols, And Ip Addressing Used? 4.4.8 Does The System Have A System Security Plan (ssp) Outlining Its Implementation Status With Security Controls? 4.4.9 Has The System Undergone Network Vulnerability Scans, And Network Enumeration Scans (nessus, Wireshark, Nmap, Etc.)? 4.4.10 Does The System Have A List Of Hardware Used To Process, Store, And Transmit Information? (i.e., Full Bill Of Material (bom)) 4.4.11 Does The System Have A Complete List Of The Software Used On The System And Its Function(s)? (i.e., Software Bill Of Material (sbom) 4.4.12 Have Software Assurance Techniques Been Applied To The System, Ensuring Origins Of The Code And That It Is Free From Vulnerabilities (secure Sdlc, Code Scanning, Quality Checks, Patch Management Planning, Software Testing, Configuration Control, And Sbom)? 4.4.13 Describe How Your Company Has Implemented Enterprise Cybersecurity Standards Onto Your Resident It Equipment To Be Ability To Process, Store, And Transmit Dod Controlled Unclassified Information (cui). 4.4.14 Is The Company’s It Infrastructure Capable Of Meeting The Requirements Directed In Dfars 252.204-7012 For Safeguarding Covered Defense Information And Cyber Incident Reporting? 4.4.15 Has The Company Assessed Their Cybersecurity Implementation Against The Nist Sp 800-171 Sp Framework? 4.4.16 Has Your Company Undergone A Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (cmmc)? 4.4.17 Does The Company Have An Enterprise Ssp? 5.0 Responses/submission all Interested Sources Shall Submit Responses Electronically, Consisting Of A Capability Statement (paragraph 3.0) As Wells As Addressing The Information Required By Paragraph 4.0 Above Via Email To Contract Specialist, Ms. Heather Buckler At Heather.m.buckler.civ@us.navy.mil And Procuring Contracting Officer, Ms. Kristen Ferro At Kristen.w.ferro.civ@us.navy.mil. e-mail Must Contain The Following In The Subject Line: "rfi Response To Notice 243-24-189 Uas Coco Isr Services, (pma-263)” note That File Sizes Larger Than 5mb Are Not Recommended, As They May Not Be Receivable Due To Navy Marine Corps Intranet Security Protocol. 6.0 Format request For Information Responses Are Limited To 15 Pages, In 12-point Font, Not Including Preprinted (pre-published) Information Material. in Order To Maximize Efficiency And Minimize The Effort Involved In The Evaluation Process, All Submissions Must Comply With The Following Format And Content: 8.5 X 11 Inch Page single-spaced Typed Lines newspaper Column Formatting Is Not Permitted 1 Inch Margins On All Sides not Smaller Than A 12 Point Font Without Condensing photographs, Pictures Or Hyperlinks Are Permitted files Shall Be Microsoft Office 2016 Compatible Or Pdf Format; No Zip Files all Material Provided In Response To This Request For Information Shall Be Unclassified. to The Maximum Extent Practicable, Respondents Should Limit The Delivery Of Non-proprietary Information. Responses To This Request For Information Will Not Be Returned. If The Response Includes Proprietary Information, (1) Ensure Proprietary Information Is Marked Appropriately, (2) Identify Disposition Instructions, And (3) Indicate Whether You Require Government Support Contractors Providing Advisory And Assistance Services To The Government To Facilitate The Execution Of Information/proprietary Exchange Agreements With You. Government Support Contractors May Assist In The Review Of Any Data Provided By Applicants. government Support Contractors Have Entered Into Non-disclosure Agreements (ndas) With The Government, Which Precludes Them From Disclosing Any Proprietary Data Outside Of The Government. However, If Respondents Desire A Separate Nda With Government Support Contractors, Respondents Should Submit An Nda Form, Along With Instructions, To The Points Of Contact Listed In This Notice At The Time Of Their Submission. If Respondents Choose Not To Submit An Nda Form For Completion, Their Submission Of A Response To This Announcement Constitutes Consent That The Government Support Contractors Will Have Access To Their Proprietary Information. The Government Will Not Be Responsible For The Disclosure Of Any Confidential/proprietary Information Not Clearly Marked. At Any Time After Receipt Of Request For Information Responses, The Government May Contact Respondents Independently For Further Clarification Of The Submittal. 7.0 Past Responses To Questions Received 7.1 The Below Questions And Answers Are In Previous Responses To An Inquiry Regarding Section 3.0, Requirements From Past Industry Days: 7.1.1 Is This [operational] Range Based On A Maritime Deployment/installation? answer: The 75nm Range Is For Both Sea-based And Land-based Uas Operations. 7.1.2 Is This [operational Range] Considered A Connection Between The Ground Control System At The Launch Site Or Could That Also Include A “handoff” Between The Air Vehicle And A Forward Node To Extend Operational Flexibility? answer: A Single Air Vehicle Must Be Able To Operate A Minimum Of 75nm From The Ground Control Station Located At The Launch Site. 7.1.3 Is The Operational Range Based On A Customer Concept Of Operation Or Is There Any Additional Information Available? answer: There Is No Additional Information That Can Be Provided. 7.1.4 Is There Any Additional Information On This Jam-to-signal Calculation? answer: There Is No Additional Information That Can Be Provided. 7.2 The Below Questions And Answers Are In Response To An Inquiry Regarding Section 4.0, Requested Information, Part 4.3.3. 7.2.1 Is 54,000 [flight-hours Per Year] Intended To Be 5,400 [flight-hours Per Year]? answer: 54,000 Flight-hours Per Year Was For All Six Sites Currently Operating. Part 4.3.3 Has Been Updated To Reflect 9,000 Flight-hours Per Year Per Site. 7.2.2 Are The Sparing Requirements For Spare Air Vehicles Or Component Parts Based On Mean Time Before Failure? answer: Sparing Requirements And Details Are Based Solely On The Original Equipment Manufacturer (oem) Assessments Of What Is Required To Meet The Previously Stated Flight-hour Requirements