Architect Tenders

Details: Presolicitation Notice presolicitation Notice page 11 Of 11 presolicitation Notice *=required Field presolicitation Notice page 1 Of 11 this Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualifications Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder/plan Holder List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. general Information veterans Health Administration (vha) Regional Procurement Office West (rpow) Network Contracting Office 20 (nco20) Is Seeking Sources And Intends To Award A Firm Fixed Price Design Contract For Architect-engineering (a-e) Services For The Development Of Complete Construction Documents, Which Include Working Drawings, Specifications, And Reports, And Construction Period Services For Project # 668-25-102 Replace Asphalt, Drywells, And Sidewalks At The Mann-grandstaff Vamc In Spokane, Wa. The A-e Services Contract That Is Anticipated To Be Awarded Will Be Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Statute [formerly Known As The Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36.6 Architectural And Engineering Services, Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 836.6, And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) M836.6 Architect-engineer Services. In Accordance With Far 36.209, Construction Contracts With Architect-engineer Firms, No Contract For The Construction Of A Project Shall Be Awarded To The Firm That Designed The Project Or Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, Except With The Approval Of The Head Of The Agency Or Authorized Representative. project Information this Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541330 Engineering Services And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $25.5m. A Full Design Team Is Required To Complete This Project. The Va Expects To Award The Anticipated A-e Contract In Late March 2025. the Anticipated Period Of Performance For Completion Of Design Is 255 Calendar Days After Notice Of Award (noa). The Vaar Magnitude Of Construction Is Between $5,000,000 And $10,000,000. Please Note That The 255 Calendar-day Period Of Performance For The Design Completion Begins With The Issuance Of The Noa And That A Notice To Proceed (ntp) Will Not Be Issued For The Completion Of A Design Project. submission Requirements: the Below Information Contains The Instructions And Format That Must Be Followed For The Submission Of The Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications: submit One (1) Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications To Contract Specialist Rachel Heider At Nco20aesf330@va.gov And Rachel.heider@va.gov. This Must Include Parts I And Ii And Any Applicable Attachments. the Submission Must Include The Sf 330, Architect-engineer Qualifications (form Is Available Online At Http://www.cfm.va.gov/contract/ae.asp). the Sf 330 Submission Is Due By January 13, 2025 At 11:00 Am Pst. the Sf 330 Must Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted. the Subject Line Of The Email Must Read: Sf 330 Submission 36c26025r0032 Project 668-25-102 Replace Asphalt, Drywells, And Sidewalks. the Sf 330 Submission Must Not Exceed A Total Of 35 Pages. This Includes Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information. Any Pages Submitted By An Offeror That Exceed The Limit Will Not Be Considered During The Evaluation. Each Page Must Be In Arial Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. Part Ii Of The Sf 330 And Any Cpars Or Ppqs Will Not Count Toward The Page Limitation. a Ppq Obtained For Another Sf 330 Submission May Be Submitted For This Project. However, If Significant Portions Of The Project Have Been Completed Since The Ppq Was Filled Out, A New Ppq Should Be Submitted To Accurately Assess The Project. firms Must Include The Following Information In Section B Of The Sf 330 Submission: sam Unique Entity Identifier tax Id Number cage Code primary Point Of Contact S Email Address And Phone Number all Questions Must Be Submitted To Rachel.heider@va.gov And Dennis.einarson@va.gov With The Subject Line Sf 330 Questions - 36c26025r0032 Project 668-25-102 Replace Asphalt, Drywells, And Sidewalks. The Cutoff For Question Submission Is 12/30/2024 At 11:00 Am Pst. Questions Will Be Answered Through Amendment To The Notice Posted To Contract Opportunities At Sam.gov. this Procurement Is A 100% Set-aside For Sdvosb Concerns. Offers Received From Other Than Sdvosbs Will Not Be Considered. Offerors Must Be Certified As Sdvosbs By The U.s. Small Business Administration (sba) And Visible In The Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/) At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award. Failure To Be Certified In The Vetcert Database At These Times Will Result In The Offeror Being Deemed Ineligible For Award. all Joint Ventures Must Be Sba Certified At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award And Must Submit Agreements That Comply With 13 Cfr 128.402 Prior To Contract Award. all Prime Firms Must Meet The Naics Code Requirement Specified In This Notice. The Contracting Officer Will Verify The Naics Code In Vetcert. Failure To Meet The Naics Code Requirement May Result In The Rejection Of The Sf 330 Submission. sf 330 Submissions Received After The Date And Time Specified Will Not Be Considered. Late Proposal Rules Per Far 15.208 Will Be Followed For Late Submittals. firms Not Providing The Required Information May Not Be Evaluated. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf 330 Submission Package. it Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Contract Opportunities Website At Sam.gov For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submitting Their Sf 330. a-e Selection Process firms Who Timely Submit Sf 330s In Response To This Announcement, And In Accordance With Submission Requirements, Will Be Considered For Evaluation. The Selection Will Be Made As Follows: sf 330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Primary Selection Criteria As Stated In This Notice. These Evaluations Will Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms For This Particular Requirement. in Accordance With Far 36.602-3(c), At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Then Be Notified Of The Government S Intent To Hold Discussions. Firms That Were Not Selected For Discussions Will Be Notified At This Time. In Accordance With Far 36.607(b), Any Requested Debriefings Of Successful And Unsuccessful Firms Will Be Held After Final Selection Has Taken Place And Will Be Conducted, To The Extent Practicable, In Accordance With 15.503, 15.506(b) Through (f), And 15.507(c). Note That 15.506(d)(2) Through (d)(5) Do Not Apply To Architect-engineer Contracts. discussions Will Be Held With Top Three Firms In The Form Of Written Responses. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Contract Specialist Or Contracting Officer By Email With Detailed Instructions That Will Include Questions Or Topics To Address. following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Based On The Primary And (if Necessary) Secondary Selection Criteria. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Sf 330 Submission For Each Firm, As Well As Additional Information Obtained Via Discussions. The Highest Rated Firm Will Be Selected To Receive The Solicitation And Engage In Negotiations. the Solicitation Will Be Issued To The Highest Rated Firm As A Request For Fee Proposal (rfp). All Sow Attachments And Site-specific Documentation Will Be Provided To The Highest Rated Firm With The Rfp. A Site Visit May Be Authorized During The Negotiation Process. an Award Will Then Be Made As Long As The Negotiation Of Rates And Hours Leads To A Fair, Balanced, And Reasonable Determination Of The Final Contract Price. If Negotiations With The Highest Rated Firm Are Unsuccessful, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until Award Can Be Made Or This Announcement Is Cancelled. primary Selection Criteria: firms Responding To This Notice Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Using The Primary And Secondary Selection Criteria Listed Below. The Factors Are Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. The Evaluation Will Consider How Each Factor Is Addressed And How It Is Formatted To Coincide With The Selection Criteria. selection Criteria 1, Professional Qualifications (sections C Through E): The Evaluation Will Consider The Professional Qualification Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm As Full-time Employees) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project, And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team When Evaluating Professional Qualifications. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. The A-e Shall Demonstrate They Are Able To Sign And Stamp Each Drawing By Individuals Licensed In Any State In The United States For The Key Positions Listed Below. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure. a Resume For Each Of These Key Positions Must Be Provided Via Section E Of The Sf330. Key Positions And Disciplines Required For This Project May Include Among Others: architect civil Engineer cost Estimator electrical Engineer environmental Engineer fire Protection Engineer geotechnical Engineer project Manager quality Assurance structural Engineer offer Must Include The Following Statement Of Sdvosb Compliance On The Cover Page When Submitting The Personnel Proposed To Perform The Work Under This Requirement: I [signatory Authority] ___________________, [company Or Joint Venture] __________________, Certify That The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance To Firms That Are Not Certified Sdvosbs By The Small Business Association S Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) In Compliance Of Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 852.219-75. the Information Provided In Sections C Through E Of The Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate This Evaluation Factor. Do Not Include This Information In Section H, Unless It Is Pertinent To Support The Information Listed In The Other Sections. selection Criteria 2, Specialized Experience And Technical Competence (sections F, G, And H): the Evaluation Will Consider Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In Design And Construction Period Services For Existing Site Corrections, Including Sidewalks, Drainage, And Parking. Provide Information For Example Projects Which Best Illustrate The Proposed Team S Experience And Competencies For This Contract. Submissions Shall Include Information Regarding Experience And Competence In: experience At A Medical Center repair Existing Conditions And Issues In The Renovated And New Construction Space provide New Electrical, Lighting, Fire Protection, Site Repair Or Construction Of Parking Lots, Sidewalks, And Drainage, The New And Renovated Spaces. phasing Of The New Construction And Renovation To Minimize Disruption To Hospital Operations: Must Remain Operational Throughout Construction. other Specialized Experience Includes Experience In Critical Path Scheduling, Seismic Design, Construction Infection Control Protocols, Waste Reduction, Use Of Recovered Materials, And Sustainable Design Practices. submissions Shall Include The Following Information For Example Projects: project Title, Location And Detailed Narrative Describing The Scope Of Services Provided Including The Type Of Work Performed By The Offeror And Its Role In The Project I.e., Prime Contract, Teaming Partner, Or Subcontractor project Owner, Owner S Point Of Contact Including Telephone Number And Email Address. services & Deliverables Provided Under The Contract Or Task Order period Of Performance, Including Start And Completion Dates total Dollar Value Of The Project contract Number Associated With The Project. submissions Shall Include No More Than Five (5) And No Less Than Three (3) Recent And Relevant, Government And Private Experience, Example Projects, Similar In Size, Scope, Construction Features And Complexity, Which Clearly Illustrate Experience And Competencies Listed Above And In Other Portions Of This Solicitation. Recent Is Defined As Services Provided In The Five (5) Years Prior To The Closing Date Of This Solicitation. Relevant Is Defined As Projects, Within The United States, Its Territories, Or Possessions, Requiring Tasks Identified In This Solicitation. Similar Complexity Is Considered Projects Of An Operational, Construction, Or Design Likeness To The Work Covered In This Solicitation. at Least Three (3) Example Projects Must Have Construction Completed Or Construction Substantially (50%+) Complete. submit Example Project Information In Section F Of The Sf 330. section G Of The Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate The Prior Experience Of The Prime Firm And Any Key Subcontractors Working Together On The Provided Example Projects. the Evaluation Will Also Consider Narratives Addressing The Following Topics For The Offeror, And Key Consultants, In Section H Of The Sf 330: the Management S Approach the Coordination Of Disciplines And Subcontractors quality Control Procedures, And familiarity With Va Design Guides/manuals, Master Specifications, And Other Applicable Standards. the Narratives Should Clearly Illustrate How Each Of The Topics Were Addressed. Re-stating Or Reiterating This List Or The Scope Of Work In Section H Will Not Be Sufficient. narratives Submitted In Section H Of The 330, Shall Not Exceed One (1) Page In Length For The Offeror And Each Key Consultant. The Narrative Submissions Shall Not Exceed Ten (10) Pages Total For This Criterion. selection Criteria 3, Capacity (section H) the Evaluation Will Consider The Team S Plan And The Evaluation Will Consider The Firm S Ability To Meet The Schedule Of The Overall Project, As Well As The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time. provide The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines By Providing Current Project Workload, Inclusive Of All Projects Awarded During The Previous 12 Months And The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts. offeror Shall Clearly State Their Available Capacity Presenting Workload Percentages For The Key Disciplines And/or Team Members. Also, The Offeror Must Provide The Completion Percentages And Expected Completion Date For Projects Awarded In The Previous 12 Months. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Please Ensure The Capacity Applies Toward The Team/personnel Provided In The Sf 330. selection Criteria 4, Past Performance (section H) the Evaluation Will Consider The Firm S Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Database Will Be Reviewed To Evaluate The Projects That Have A Cpars Entry. Cpars Are Not Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330 Submission. The Contract Number For The Project Must Be Submitted With Each Project In Section F So Cpars Can Be Reviewed In The Database. for Any Project That Does Not Have Cpars Data Available, A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Is Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. In The Event That A Firm Does Not Receive A Requested Complete Ppq From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title/contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. evaluations May Also Include Additional Performance Related From The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers May Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. All Projects Provided In The Sf 330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. for Ppqs, Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document Only. Completed Ppqs Should Be Incorporated Into The Sf 330 Directly. Ppqs Should Not Be Submitted Separately To Nco20 Directly. Any Ppqs Will Not Be Counted Towards The Page Limitations For This Submission. However, Any Narratives Provided For Past Performance In Section H Shall Not Exceed Two (2) Pages In Length And Will Be Counted Toward The Total Submission Page Limit. selection Criteria 5, Knowledge Of The Locality (section H), the Evaluation Will Consider The Knowledge Of The Locality, Including Specific Knowledge Of Local Conditions Or Project Site Features, Such As Geological Features, Climatic Conditions, Working With And Local Construction Methods Or Local Laws And Regulations Of The Area Of Spokane, Wa. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. note That The Intent Of This Factor Is To Showcase A Firm S Understanding Of The Project Site And Locality, And Not Where The Firm Is Located, How Far Away The Firm/branch Office Is From The Site, And How They Would Travel To The Site. Information Related To The Firm S Location Shall Be Provided In Section H Under Secondary Selection Criterion Factor 1, Geographic Location. See Below. selection Criteria 6, Experience In Construction Period Services, (section H) the Evaluation Will Consider Experience In Construction Period Services (cps) Necessary For Performance Of This Contract. Submissions Shall Provide Information Which Clearly Illustrates Cps Experience In The Following: solicitation Support Services professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Both Scheduled And Emergent coordination With Commissioning Requirements/commissioning Services review Of Construction Submittals For Design Conformance, Variance, And Applicable Code/standard Compliance support In Answering Requests For Information (rfi) During The Construction Period support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Cost Estimates maintaining A Comprehensive Submittal Log Inclusive Of Material Data, Shop Drawings, Certifications, Etc. providing Timely And Complete Responses To Requests For Information providing Supporting Documentation (statements Of Work, Cost Estimates, Technical Reports, Etc.) For Construction Modifications providing Record Drawing Documentation process For Correcting Design Errors/omissions Identified During Construction attendance At Pre-bid, Post-award, And Commissioning Kick Off Construction Project Conferences providing Minutes Of Weekly Construction Meetings Throughout The Duration Of Construction site Visits During Construction Both Scheduled And Emergent ensuring Compliance With The Design Drawings And Specifications preparation Of Site Visit Reports generation Of Punch-list Reports review Of Construction Project Modifications For Cost And Technical Acceptability attendance And Participation During The Final Acceptance Inspection preparation Of Record Drawings Of The Completed Construction Project Based On The Construction Contactor S As-built Drawings maintenance Of Rfi Logs attendance At Weekly Conference Calls providing Minutes Of Meetings Between The Ae, Va, And Contractors pre-final Inspection Site Visits production Of As-built Documentation the Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. secondary Selection Criterion*: Geographic Location. location Of The Firm, As Measured By The Driving Distance (miles) Between The Offeror S Principal Business Location And The Mann-grandstaff Vamc, 4815 N Assembly St, Spokane, Wa. Determination Of The Mileage Will Be Based On Google Maps. (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/). *the Secondary Selection Criterion Is Used As A Tiebreaker, If Necessary, In Ranking The Most Highly Qualified Firms Following The Completion Of Discussions. The Secondary Selection Criterion Will Not Be Applied When Determining A Firm S Sf 330 Submission Highly Qualified Or Not Highly Qualified. see Attached Document: 668-25-102 A-e Presolicitation Description. see Attached Document: Ae Sow 668-25-102. see Attached Document: 2020 Gao High Quality Project Estimate Characteristics. see Attached Document: Bldg 12 As-built Arch-str. see Attached Document: Bldg 12 As-built Mep. see Attached Document: Site Repair Replace Areas Rev 1. see Attached Document: Design Review Comment Form. see Attached Document: Ppq 668-25-102.

Details: The Us Army Corps Of Engineers, Honolulu District Is Contemplating The Award Of An Indefinite-delivery Architect-engineer Services Contract (geotechnical Engineering, Engineering Geology, Topographic Survey, Orthophotography, Cadastral Mapping And Land Parcel Mapping) For Design Of Miscellaneous Projects In The U.s. Army Corps Of Engineers (usace), Honolulu District (poh) Area Of Responsibility (aor). The Idc Will Consist Of A Base Period Of Five (5) Years With No Option Periods. The Amount Will Not Exceed A Cumulative Total Of $9,900,000 For All Contracts Awarded Under The Solicitation, Over The Five (5) Year Period. Work Is Subject To The Availability Of Funds. Each Task Order Issued Shall Be Firm-fixed Price (as Negotiated). Funding Shall Be Cited On Individual Task Orders. Only Firm(s) Considered Highly Qualified Will Be Awarded A Contract. Work Under This Contract Will Be Subject To Satisfactory Negotiation Of Individual Task Orders. Selection Of A-e Firm(s) Is Not Based Upon Competitive Bidding Procedures, But Rather Upon The Professional Qualifications Necessary For The Performance Of The Required Services. project Scope: the Firm Must Have Primary Capability In Either Geotechnical Engineering Or Land Surveying. The Firm And/or Its Consultants Must Have Capability In Disciplines That Include Geotechnical Engineering, Land Surveying, Environmental Engineering, Cost Estimating, And Specification Writing. This Includes Design And Engineering Services For Structure Foundations, Sub-grades For Roadways, Pavement Design, Soil Improvements, Site Grading, Retaining Structures, Embankments, Dams, And Soil Erosion Control. Land Surveying Work Includes Cadastral And Land Parcel Mapping; Topographic Mapping; Control Surveys; And Digital Terrain Modeling. Aerial Photography, Lidar, And Hydrographic Surveys May Occasionally Be Required. Specific Computer-aided Drafting (cad) Equipment, Format Of Cad Products, And Compliance With A/e/c Standards Will Be Required. Metric System Will Be A Requirement On Selected Projects. the Prime Contractor Must Have Capability In Either Geotechnical Engineering Or Land Surveying. Collectively As A Team, The Prime Contractor And/or Its Sub-consultants Must Have Capability In The Following Disciplines geotechnical Engineering engineering Geology topographic Surveying aerial (photography/lidar) Surveying orthophotography / Photogrammetry cadastral Mapping land Parcel Mapping hydrographic Surveying environmental Engineering civil Engineering cost Engineering background: professional Services Are Being Procured In Accordance With Pl 92-582 (brooks A-e Act) And Far Part 36, As Required For Design Support Primarily For Projects Within The Poh Aor. Work Primarily Includes But Is Not Limited To A Range Of Minor To Major Repair, Modification, Rehabilitation, Alternatives And New Construction Projects Primarily In Support Of The Department Of Defense And Associated Agencies. The Work And Type Of Services Will Consist Primarily Of Preparation Of Design Analyses And Reports; Facility Condition Studies; Plans And Specifications For The Site Designs Of Predominantly Vertical Construction Projects; Horizontal Construction Projects May Also Be In The Variety Of Work Assigned. All Design And Other Engineering-related Services Must Be Performed By Or Under The Direct Supervision Of Licensed Professional Engineers. response Information: only Interested Prime Architect-engineers Should Submit A Narrative Demonstrating Experience In The Project Scope. Please Indicate If The Firm Is A Small Business Contractor Or A Contractor That Qualifies Under A Small Business Program (i.e. 8(a), Hubzone, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business, Women-owned Small Business). size Standard. The North American Industrial Classification Code (naics) For This Procurement Is 541370. This Announcement Is Open To All Businesses Regardless Of Size. information Is Limited To 5 Single Sided Pages. this Notice Is Not A Request For Proposals. This Is A Market Research Tool Being Utilized To Determine The Availability Of Potential Qualified Contractors Before Determining The Method Of Acquisition. Please Note It Is Required That Interested Contractors Be Registered In System For Award Management (sam). Please See Www.sam.gov For Additional Information. In Addition, This Sources Sought Is Not To Be Construed As A Commitment By The Government, Nor Will The Government Pay For Any Information Solicited Or Delivered. Information Shall Be Submitted Electronically To Brett Watanabe At Brett.j.watanabe@usace.army.mil And Colin Waki At Colin.k.waki@usace.army.mil By January 21, 2025, 2:00 P.m. Hawaii Standard Time. please Note: At This Time, The Honolulu District Is Only Interested In Responses From Prime Contractors.

Details: Derry City And Strabane District Council Invites Tenders From Suitably Qualified Consultants To Provide Services Design Services For The Cathedral Quarter Environmental Improvement Scheme. The Proposed Project Involves Developing Detailed Designs, Colour Palette And Costings For The Painting Of Commercial Facades And Decorative Lighting Along Bishop Street Within, London Street, Pump Street, Artillery Street And Ferryquay Street. The Need For The Project Is Influenced By The Poor Physical Presentation And Appearance Of Many Of The Commercial Properties Along This Stretch Of The City Centre. All Of The Streets Experience High Volumes Of Pedestrian And Vehicular Traffic. These Streets Have Witnessed Continued Physical Decline In Recent Years And Present A Poorly Maintained Image Of The Town Centre – Detracting From The Other Recent And Nearby Regeneration Projects Delivered In The Town Centre. Derry City And Strabane District Council Therefore Invites Tenders From Experienced And Competent Architects / Practices To Provide Architectural Services Delivery Based Upon Riba Plan Of Works 2013 Stage 0 To 4 Detailed Design Inclusive For Each Of The Properties. Please Refer To The Cft Documents For Further Detail.

Details: The City Of Calgary Is Issuing This Rfp For The Purpose Of Retaining A Qualified Architectural Consulting Firm To Act As A Coordinating Registered Professional (crp) For The East Calgary Multi-service Facility Project. The City Will Select A Single Integrated Project Team Led By The Consultant To Provide All Services From Pre-design And Site Plan Validation To Post Construction, Delivering The Envisioned Project The Consultant's Work Will Include Coordinating Of All Required Consulting Services As Needed. The Project Spans The Seven (7) Phases: Pre-design And Site Plan Validation, Schematic Design, Design Development, Contract Documentation, Construction Procurement Assistance, Construction Contract Administration, And Post Construction. The East Calgary Multi-service Facility Project Is A Phased Redevelopment At The Existing East Calgary Waste Management Site. This New Facility Is A Replacement And Expansion Of The Existing End-of-life Facilities. The Consultant Will Need To Maximize The Use Of The Available Site To Support The Co-location Of Multiple Service Lines. The Key Project Objectives Focuses On Site Safety, Operational Efficiency, And Sustainability Initiatives That Respond To Climate Risk And Resilience Such As Achieving Leadership In Energy And Environmental Design (leed) V4 Gold Certification And Meeting The Minimum Performance Requirements Of The Sustainable Building Policy. The Overall Redevelopment Consists Of The Following Three (3) Components. • Component 1 – New Fleet Maintenance Facility And Shared Administration Area • Component 2 – New Waste And Recycling Vehicle Storage Facility • Component 3 – New Offsite Regional Pathways, Sidewalks, Road Improvements, And Fuel Island Outside Of The Project Site The Scope Of This Project Is The Design Of Components 1 And 2 And Construction Of Component 1. Construction Of Component 2, And Design And Construction Of Component 3 Are Future Additional Scope. The Consultant Will Need To Design Component 1 While Considering The Requirements For The Future Construction Of Component 2 And Incorporate It Into The Design In Addition To Maintaining The Ongoing Operations At The Existing East Calgary Waste Management Site With Minimal Impact. To Be Considered For This Project, The Consultant Team Members Must Be Able To Be Registered With The Alberta Association Of Architects (aaa) (or Association Of Professional Engineers And Geoscientists Of Alberta (apega) Or Alberta Association Of Landscape Architects (aala) Registrations As Required) Prior To Award. Information/pre-bid Meeting Wed•dec 18, 2024•1:00 Pm (mt)

Details: Engineering Services Other Architect And Engineering Services Engineering Services Soumission No 2024-091015p Services De Conception Architecturale Paysagiste - Sentiers De King's Square Et Am Liorations Du Secteur Les Soumissions Scell Es, Remises En Mains Propres Ou Livr Es Par Messagerie, Marqu Es Convenablement Selon Leur Contenu Et Adress Es L'agent D'achat, Gestion De La Cha Ne D'approvisionnement, City Of Saint John, 175, Avenue Rothesay, 1ere Tage, Saint John (nouveau-brunswick) E2j 2b4, Intitul Es : # 2024-091015p - Services De Conception Architecturale Paysagiste - Sentiers De King's Square Et Am Liorations Du Secteur Doivent Tre Re Ues Au Plus Tard Le Mercredi, 15 Janvier 2025 16h 00:00 Heure Locale. Les Soumissionnaires Doivent Noter Que Cette Mesure D'approvisionnement Est Assujettie Aux Accords Sur Le Commerce Int Rieur Suivants : # L'accord De Libre- Change Canadien # Politique De La Ville De Saint John Pour L'approvisionnement Strat Gique # Loi Sur La Passation Des March S Publics Et Le R Glement 2014-93 Du Nouveau-brunswick Il Est Possible D'obtenir Des D Tails Et Les Addendas Relatifs L'appel D'offres Sur Le Site Web De La Ville De Saint John, Au Www.saintjohn.ca Sous L'option De Menu, H Tel De Ville Et Soumissions Et Propositions . Il Est Fortement Conseill Aux Promoteurs Int Ress S De S'inscrire Titre De Soumissionnaire Avec Le D Partement De La Gestion De La Cha Ne D'approvisionnement En Envoyant Leurs Coordonn Es Par Courriel L'adresse : Supplychainmanagement@saintjohn.ca Pour Toute Demande De Renseignements, Communiquez Avec Monic Macvicar, Au Plus Tard Le Mardi, 7 Janvier 16h :00 :00. Heure Locale Soit Par Courriel, Supplychainmanagement@saintjohn.ca **les Demandes De Renseignements Apr S Cette Date Ne Recevront Pas De R Ponse. This Is A Tender Notice Only. In Order To Submit A Bid, You Must Obtain Official Tender Documents From The New Brunswick Opportunities Network, Another Authorized Tendering Service Or As Indicated In The Tender Notice.

Details: Summary: the Philadelphia District Of The U. S. Army Corps Of Engineers, Philadelphia, Pa Intends To Award A Sole Source Modification To An Existing Firm Fixed Price Contract (w912bu-20-d-0002) To Borton-lawson Engineering, Llc, Under Authority 10 U.s.c. § 2304(c)(l), Only One Responsible Source And No Other Supplies Or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, As Implemented By Far 6.302-l(b)(1)(ii). The Applicable Naics Code For This Requirement Is 541330 Engineering Services With A Size Standard Of $25,500,000. the Current Idiq Contract Was Awarded In The Amount Of $5m. This Modification Will Increase The Capacity By $700,000.00, Which Brings The Total Value Of The Contract To $5.7m To Ensure Nap Is Able To Support Tobyhanna Army Depot Programs Without A Break In Service. The Period Of Performance For The Idiq Contract Is Through 26 June 2025. A Period Of Performance Extension Is Not Included In This Modification. this Idiq Contract For Architect-engineer Services Is To Perform Professional Engineering And Design Service Projects For Tobyhanna Army Depot. Work Includes Provides The Tobyhanna Army Depot With Multidiscipline Architecture And Engineering Services For Planning, Design, And Construction Quality Assurance In Support Of Tobyhanna Missions. the Existing Contract Holder (borton-lawson) Is The Only Source That Can Provide Continued Unique Services To Maintain The Overall Delivery Of Supported Projects. There Is A High Likelihood That Modifications To Existing Task Orders Will Be Required Due To Unforeseen Conditions And Requirements. Task Orders Under This Idiq Require Modification With A Value That Exceeds Available Capacity. Additional Capacity Is Needed To Complete These Task Orders And Any Other Contingencies For The Other Open Work Under The Idiq So That The Projects Can Be Advanced Without Delay. Only One Responsible Source And No Other Supplies Or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, As Implemented By Far 6.302-l(b)(1)(ii). this Notice Of Intent Is Not A Request For Competitive Proposals. However, Responses May Be Submitted To Quinn Greene, Contract Specialist, Through Quinn.p.greene@usace.army.mil And Responses Received No Later Than 15:00 Est, 14 January 2025 Shall Be Considered By The Agency. contracting Agency: u.s. Army Corps Of Engineers (usace), Philadelphia District (nap), Contracting (ct), 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pa 19103-2004. authority Cited: 10 U.s.c. § 2304(c)(l), Only One Responsible Source And No Other Supplies Or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements, As Implemented By Far 6.302-l(b)(1)(ii).

Details: The Ieso Is Currently Undergoing A Program Of Work To Update And Enhance Its Work Spaces (the “future@work Program” Or The “program”). The Program Is Currently In The Planning And Execution Phase For Two (2) Office Renovation Projects At Its Downtown Toronto (“adelaide”) And Mississauga (“clarkson”) Locations. Each Location Will Be Delivered As An Individual Project. The Ieso Is Seeking A Qualified Firm To Supply, Install & Provide Extended Warranty Services For Audio Visual Equipment At Both The Adelaide And Clarkson Locations. An Overview And Further Details Of The Current Estimates For Projected Projects Can Be Found In Section 2.1 Of This Appendix B. The Service Provider Will Be Expected To Provide Detailed Engineered Drawings, Supply All Products, Services, Installation, Software And Programming, Testing And Commissioning For Complete And Functional Systems As Intended In This Document. All Products And Components For The Complete System May Not Be Listed In This Documentation. It Will Be The Responsibility Of The Service Provider To Provide Detailed Engineered Solutions And Supply All Requirements For Full And Complete Working Systems Proponents Should Be Aware That The Ieso Has Retained Rdh Architects As Its Design And Engineering Team (the “prime Consultant”) Responsible For All Architectural Design And Engineering Services Related To The Program. The Service Provider Will Be Expected To Coordinate And Work Closely With The Prime Consultant, And Any Designated Subconsultants, Throughout All Stages Of The Program.

Details: Presolicitation Notice presolicitation Notice page 5 Of 5 presolicitation Notice *=required Field presolicitation Notice page 1 Of 5 request For Sf330 1. Introduction: This Is A Total 100% Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) Set-aside In Accordance With Public Law 109-461. This Is A Request For Sf330s For Architect/engineer (a/e) Design Services For Project Number 538-25-206 Repair Clc Shower Access At The Chillicothe Vamc, 17273 State Route 104 Chillicothe Ohio, 45601. this Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal. No Solicitation Package Will Be Issued Via Fbo. A Request For Proposal Will Be Issued Directly To The Most Preferred Firm For Which Negotiations Will Commence In Accordance With Far Subpart 36.6. The Anticipated A/e Design Services, To Be Awarded, Will Be Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Act (public Law 92- 582), Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 36.6, And Va Acquisition Regulation Subpart 836.6. 2. Description: The Architect/engineer (a/e) Shall Provide All Services Required To Prepare And Furnish Complete Documents As Required For The Accomplishment Of Project Number 538-25-206 Repair Clc Shower Access. Complete Requirement Is Outlined In The Attached Statement Of Work. period Of Performance: 238 Calendar Days After Contractor S Receipt Of Notice To Proceed contract Type: Firm-fixed-price naics Code: 541310 size Standard: $25.0 Million 3. Vetcert & Sam: In Accordance With Vaar 819.7003(b) (deviation), At The Time Of Offers/quotes (sf330 Submission), And At The Time Of Award Of Any Contract, The Offeror Must Represent To The Contracting Officer That It Is A (1) Sdvosb Eligible Firm; (2) Small Business Concern Under The North American Industry Classification System (naics) Code Assigned To The Acquisition; And (3) Deviation - Certified Sdvosb/vosb Listed In The Sba Certification Database (aka Vetcert) At Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/ (see 13 Cfr 128). if Registration Is Required, Visit Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/ To Register. additionally, All Eligible Firms Must Be Registered And Current In The System For Award Management (sam) Database In Order To Be Evaluated And Eligible For Contract Award. If The Firm Is Not Registered In Sam, You May Register At Https://www.sam.gov. 4. Evaluation Criteria: the Government Will Award A Contract Resulting From This Solicitation To The Responsible Offeror Whose Offer Conforming To The Solicitation Will Be Most Advantageous To The Government. Firms Responding To This Notice Shall Do So Using Standard Form 330 (sf-330) And Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Using The Selection Criteria Listed Below. The Evaluation Factors Are To Be Addressed In Section H Of The Sf-330 Unless Otherwise Detailed Below. The Evaluation Will Consider How Each Factor Is Addressed To Coincide With The Selection Criteria. The Factors Are Individually Weighted As Indicated. the Following Factors Shall Be Used To Evaluate Offers: professional Qualifications (15% Weighting) specific Experience (20% Weighting) firm S Capacity (15% Weighting) past Performance (15% Weighting) geographic Location (10% Weighting) construction Period Services (15% Weighting) use Of Sdvosb, Vosb And Small Business (10% Weighting) please Note: The Ae Evaluation Board Must Be Provided With Complete And Accurate Information For All Evaluation Factors Above In Order To Rank Interested And Eligible Firms. Therefore, The Ae Firm Must Expand Upon, As It Deems Necessary, On Any Evaluation Factor Not Well Demonstrated Or Addressed With Part Ia To Part Ig And Part Ii Of The Sf330. The Ae Firm Shall Use Part Ih And/or Use Additional Sheets To Supplement/address All Evaluation Factors To Clearly Demonstrate Its Qualifications. 5. Limits On Subcontracting: In Accordance With Vaar 852.219-73 Va Notice Of Total Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Set-aside Under 852.219-73(a)(1)(v), It States: The Business Will Comply With Subcontracting Limitations In 13 Cfr 125.6, As Applicable. for Clarification, 13 Cfr 125.6 States In The Case Of A Contract For Services (except Construction), It (i.e. Sdvosb) Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To It To Firms That Are Not Similarly Situated. Any Work That A Similarly Situated Subcontractor Further Subcontracts Will Count Towards The 50% Subcontract Amount That Cannot Be Exceeded. 6. Selection Process: In Accordance With Far 36.6, Sf330s Will Be Evaluated By The Evaluation Board Using The Evaluation Factors Identified In This Announcement. After Sf330s Have Been Evaluated, If The Board Intends On Holding Discussions Or Interviews At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Be Selected. After Discussions Conclude, The Evaluation Board Will Evaluate The Qualifications Of The Firms Using The Same Evaluation Factors, Taking Into Consideration Both The Sf330 Submission And Subsequent Discussions, To Select The Most Preferred Firm From The Firms Considered To Be The Most Highly Qualified. Negotiations Will Begin With The Most Preferred Firm In The Final Selection. 7. Submission Requirements: Interested And Eligible Firms Should Submit Their Current Sf330 As Follows: 1) One (1) Electronic Pdf Copy Via E-mail: a. See Attachments For Procedures (i.e., Ecms Getting Started Guide For Vendors & Ecms Vendors_guide_v4_2); b. Size Limitation Is 20mb; the Sf330s Are Due On Wednesday January 8, 2025, At 4pm Est. acceptable Electronic Formats (software) For Submission Of Sf330 Packages: (a) Files Readable Using The Current Adobe Portable Document Format (pdf); (b) Files In Adobe* Pdf Files: When Scanning Documents Scanner Resolution Should Be Set To 200 Dots Per Inch, Or Greater; (c) Sf330s Shall Be Provided On Standard Letter Size 8-1/2 By 11-inch Paper, Limited To A Maximum Of Seventy-five (75), Single-sided, Single-spaced, And Numbered Pages. If More Than Seventy-five (75) Single-sided Pages Are Submitted, All Pages After Seventy-five (75) Pages Will Not Be Evaluated. The Font For Text Shall Be Times New Roman 12-point Or Larger; (d) Please Note That We Can No Longer Accept .zip Files Due To Increasing Security Concerns. the Sf330 Can Be Downloaded Through The Gsa Forms Library At: Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/top, Type In Sf330 In The Find A Form Block And Click On Search. 8. No Fax Or Telephonic Responses Will Be Accepted: Personal Visits Or Telephone Calls For Discussing This Announcement Will Not Be Entertained Or Scheduled. Questions May Be Directed Only By E-mail To Ryan.stark@va.gov No Later Than Friday, 20 December 2024, By 4pm Est. 9. Va Primary Point Of Contact: - Ryan W. Stark - Contract Specialist - Email: Ryan.stark@va.gov see Attached Document: 03 2024-08-27 B210-211 Repair Clc Showers Ae Scope Of Work. see Attached Document: 12 538-2-206 Evaluation Criteria.

Details: ***a0001 Is Attached*** A-e Services Are Being Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Statute (public Law 92-582), Formerly Known As The Brooks Act, And Implemented In Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) 36.6. All Submissions Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Evaluation Criteria Listed Herein. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse, Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. Firms Will Be Selected Based On Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Required Work. The Naics Code For This Acquisition Is 541330 And The Applicable Small Business Size Standard Is $25.5m. The Area Of Consideration Is Restricted To A 500-mile Radius Of The Alexandria Va Health Care System (avahcs), 2495 Shreveport Hwy, 71n, Pineville, La 71360, In Which Either The A/e Firm S Primary Or Already Established Auxiliary/satellite Office Must Be Located. Note: The 500-mile Radius Will Be Measured By One Or More Of The Nationally Recognized Commercial Free On-line Mapping Services From The Primary Or Already Established Auxiliary/satellite Office Address To The Above Va Address (shortest Driving Distance Option). In-order To Use The Address Of An Already Established Auxiliary/satellite Office, The A/e Firm Must Have Employees Of Their Firm Who Are Currently (before And At The Time Of Sf330 Submission) Physically Located At The Auxiliary/satellite Office (a Home Of An Employee Does Not Meet The Requirement Of An Auxiliary/satellite Office) And Are On The A/e S Payroll Not Employees Of An Actual Or Proposed Subcontractor Or On The Payroll Of An Actual Or Proposed Subcontractor. Contract Award Procedure: The Proposed A/e Services Will Be Obtained By A Negotiated Firm-fixed Price Contract. Interested Parties Shall Ensure Current Licensing And Have A Current Registration In The System For Award Management (sam) Database At Https://www.sam.gov And The Sba Veteran S Small Business Database At Veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov) As Well As Have Submitted The Current Cycle Vets-4212 (formerly Called Vets-100) Report Per The Requirements Located At Https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212. Failure Of A Proposed Sdvosb To Be Certified By The Sba At The Time The Sf330 S Are Submitted Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration As A Proposed Contractor. Sdvosb Requirements: In Accordance With Va Notice Of Total Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Set-aside, A Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Concern Agrees That, In The Performance Of The Contract, It Will Not Pay More Than 50 Percent Of The Amount Paid By The Government To It To Firms That Are Not Vip Listed Sdvosbs. Design Costs: All Offerors Are Advised That In Accordance With Vaar 836.606-71(a) The Total Cost Of The Architect Or Engineer Services Contracted For Shall Not Exceed 6 Percent Of The Estimated Cost Of The Construction Project Not Including Any Fees For Investigative Services, Special Consultant Services That Are Not Normally Available In Organizations Or Architects Or Engineers That Are Not Specifically Applied To The Actual Preparation Of Working Drawings Or Specifications Of The Project For Which The Services Are Required, Costs Of Reproducing Drawings And Specifications, Travel And Per Diem Allowances, Etc. Additionally, Far 52.236-22 Design Within Funding Limitations, Will Be Applicable To This Procurement Action. Design Limitation Costs Will Be Provided To The Most Highly Qualified Ae Firm Selected To Complete The Design. The Magnitude Of Construction (not Design) Of This Project Is Between $2,000,000 And $5,000,000. Selection Criteria: The Selection Criteria For This Acquisition Are Listed Below. Note: Each Evaluation Factor Below Is To Be Specifically Addressed Not Only Through The Submission Of The Sf330s But Also In Narrative Format To Clearly Show How Each Evaluation Factor Is Formally Addressed. Evaluation Factors Are Listed In Descending Order Of Importance: Professional Qualifications Necessary For The Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services; (far 36.602-1 (a)(1)) Provide Key Personnel, It Is Expected That The Individuals Identified As Key Personnel Will Be Performing Tasks Under The Resulting Contract. Include Resumes For Key Personnel Of Proposed Sub-consultants For All Engineering Disciplines: Electrical, Data Communication, Mechanical, Civil, Structural, Environmental, Interior Design, Leed, Commissioning And Cost Estimating. Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required, Including, Where Appropriate, Experience In Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials. Provide A Minimum Of Five (5) Similar Projects To Include Technical Capabilities In Design Quality Management Procedures, Computer-aided Design And Drafting/building Information Modeling, Equipment Resources, And Laboratory Requirements For The Firm And Any Proposed Subcontractors. In Addition, Provide Information Concerning The Effectiveness Of The Proposed Project Team (including Management Structure, Coordination Of Disciplines, Subcontractors, And Prior Working Relationships). (far 36.602-1 (a)(2)) Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies, State & Local Agencies, And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. Provide Information Concerning Superior Performance Ratings On Recently (last 5 Years From Date Of Qualification Submission For This Project) Completed Va Projects. (equivalent Medical/hospital Facility) As Well As The Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. Provide Information Concerning Any Claims Against The Firm Because Of Any Issues To Include Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services. Identify Post-award Construction Services Previously Performed To Include: (a) Experience In Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, (b) Reviews Of Construction Submittals, (c) Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, And (d) Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Reviewing/providing Cost Estimates. Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time To Include The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work (in The Required Time). Include Current Workload, Projected Workload For The Next 12 Months, And Key Personnel S Availability Over The Next 12 Months. Location In The General Geographical Area Of The Project And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Project (to Include Knowledge Of Geological Features, Climate Conditions, And Local Construction Methods That Are Unusual Or Unique).â Explain How Location In The General Geographical Area Of The Project And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Project Was Obtained. Identification Of, And Commit To, The Use Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors. List Percentage Of Work To Be Performed By Sdvosbs And Other Size Businesses To Be Utilized Subcontractors. List Percentage Of Work To Be Performed By Sdvosbs And Other Size Businesses To Be Utilized. Submittal Requirement: This Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Concerns Under Vaar 852.219-73, Va Notice Of Total Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Set-aside (dec 2009). All Original Standard Form (sf) 330 Packages And Narrative Information Shall Be Submitted By Email Only To Jb Herbst At The Following Email Address: Jennings.herbst@va.gov All Sf 330 Submissions Shall Be Clearly Marked With The Subject Line Displaying The Solicitation Number 36c25623r0084. The Sf330 May Be Downloaded From Www.gsa.gov/forms. Completed Sf330 S Shall Include The Primary Firms, Subcontractor Firms, And Any Consultants Expected To Be Used On The Project. All Submissions Shall Be In Black And White No Color Submissions Please. Firms That Meet The Requirements Listed In This Announcement Are Invited To Submit An Email Copy Of The Completed Sf330 Including Parts I And Ii As Described Herein To The Above Email Address No Later Than 2:00pm Local (ct) On Thursday, 07/14/2023. Late Submission/proposal Rules Found In Far 15.208 Will Be Followed For Submittals/proposals Not Received By The Exact Date And Time Listed Above So Please Do Not Wait Until The Last Minute To Submit Your Sf330s Qualification Packages In The Event Of A Firm S Email Or Internet Connectivity Issues Which Are Not Considered To Be Excusable Delays. Interested Firms Shall Address Each Of The Seven (7) Selection Criteria In Their Sf330 S And Additional Documents/submittals. Interested Firms Shall Limit The Narrative Information To Support All Seven (7) Evaluation Factors To Ten (10) Pages Total (beyond The Sf330s). Any Additional Narrative Information Past Ten (10) Pages Total Will Not Be Considered. Failure To Provide Narrative Information To Support Each Of The Seven (7) Evaluation Factors May Negatively Affect The Interested Firms Factor(s) Rating And Subsequently Their Overall Rating And Standing. This Is Not A Request For Proposal. There Are No Solicitation Documents Available. This Is A Request For Sf330 S Architect/engineer Qualifications Packages Only. Any Requests For A Solicitation Will Not Receive A Response. This Requirement Is Subject To Availability Of Funds.

Description: Competition notice – general guidelines, competition open procedure (services) 122024_kha In terms of its possible uses, the port area in Kassel has so far benefited neither from its proximity to the Fulda and the urban-spatially interesting port situation nor from the surrounding landscape. There is a considerable need for urban development action to activate the potential for new development and revitalization of the port area. Due to dominant commercial and large-scale uses and building structures, the port area currently has no effective urban attractiveness or charisma. The almost non-existent accessibility to the port and the Fulda reinforces this. Fortunately, the large property owners located in the competition area have expressed a willingness to change the use and structural development of their properties. The competition is intended to provide a qualified basis for this willingness to develop. The competition area has a size of around 11.0 hectares. Of this, around 1.7 hectares of private green space with integrated nautical uses are to be designed as part of the ideas. The aim of the implementation competition is to develop a dense urban district and its future-proof development, taking into account framework concerns such as monument protection or climate protection and climate adaptation requirements. The two-stage process serves to facilitate communication and exchange between various experts, the owners, the public and potential investors. This is intended to make it clear to the owners, even without planning knowledge, what positive developments in urban development and building construction are possible at this location. The competition is intended to develop solutions that meet the expectations at different stakeholder levels (city and owners). The competition is also intended to create a binding basis for cooperation between the city and the owners, so that they can participate reliably and significantly in the development of the area. A qualified development of the port area is also intended to support the transformation of the neighboring "co-op quarter" that has already begun and to continue the upgrading of the quarter that is currently underway in the area around the harbor basin. The process therefore creates the basis for possible future development, which is to be secured under planning law by the seamlessly subsequent development plan process. This development plan and a design manual are the contract promise that results from the open urban development and open space planning competition and the subsequent negotiation process. 122024_kha Evidence of suitability in the negotiated procedure: In order to be admitted to the negotiated procedure, the following suitability criteria must be proven: 1_proof of professional liability insurance, but at least the informal declaration of an insurer, of the following coverage amounts in the event of an order: at least EUR 3 million for personal injury and EUR 0.5 million for other damages (maximized twice). 2_name of at least 2 technical employees (architect/urban planner) and 2 technical employees (landscape architect) with qualifications corresponding to the eligibility to participate. 3_proof of development plan §§ 19 and 21 Hoai 2021: proof of at least 2 development plan procedures carried out in the last 10 years (lph 1-3). 4_naming of traffic planner: naming of the traffic planner with whom the contract is to be worked on (for competitive reasons, a traffic planner may only be a member of one group of bidders in the negotiation process). 5_declaration of the authority of the authorized representative. A bidder can use other companies to demonstrate their performance and expertise, regardless of the legal nature of the relationship between them and this company. If the bidder uses the capacities of other companies as part of a loan of suitability with regard to criteria for economic and financial performance, these must be jointly liable for the execution of the contract in accordance with the scope of the loan of suitability. Award criteria The negotiations will be carried out with the 3-5 prize winners in accordance with Section 14, Paragraph 4, Item 8. An evaluation committee will be formed to evaluate the revised drafts and the bidder presentations on the basis of the award criteria specified in advance. The composition of the committee corresponds to that of the jury of the preceding competition. The committee's working methods are based on the working methods of a jury in a competition procedure. If commissioned by the awarding authority, the bidders undertake to take over and carry out further processing. The commission is subject to the committee's approval. The award criteria in the negotiated procedure will be: 1. Evaluation of the design 50% 2. Order-related composition of the planning team 15% 3. Organization chart + key personnel 15% 4. Project organization 15% 5. Fee offer 5%. Commissioning: When the selected design is implemented, one of the bidders will be commissioned with the further planning services, taking into account the evaluation on the basis of the award criteria, unless there is an important reason to prevent the commission. The following services are part of the contract award based on the Hoai 2021: 1. Update of the urban development and open space planning concept of the competition design (informal planning) 2. Development plan Lph 1-3 §§ 19 and 21 Hoai 2021 incl. accompanying plans 3. Design manual with elaboration and concretization of the in-depth areas A. Design planning for public spaces incl. promenade B. Open space planning as an example for two or three in-depth areas C. Development/infrastructure D. Building construction in-depth area incl. Materiality E. Alternative uses Listed building fabric F. Step-by-step plan regarding the realization and implementation sections/modules 4. Optional: Commissioning of outdoor area planning for the promenade in accordance with Section 39 ff. Hoai 2021, Min. Lph 1-5 In the event of further commissioning, services already provided through the competition up to the amount of the prize money awarded will not be remunerated if and to the extent that the competition design is used as the basis for further processing in its essential parts unchanged. The processing fee (2nd stage) remains with the bidder. The services are to be awarded as a whole in the sense of general planning. The bidder is free to take on the planning as a sole proprietorship (if necessary with subcontractors) or as a consortium. Reference is made to the possibility of a suitability loan in accordance with Section 47 Vgv. The award decision will be made in the subsequent negotiation procedure (2nd stage).