Transport Tenders

Purchaser Name: Central Purchasing Office For Public Transport | Boamp - Supply Electricity

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Land,Infrastructure And Transport | Maintenance Of Telecommunication Equipment 1 Set

Purchaser Name: Free State Police, Roads And Transport | Road Maint Gr

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Land,Infrastructure And Transport | Telecommunication Equipment Maintenance Matsuyama Station And The Others In 2025 Fiscal Year, 1 Set

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Land,Infrastructure And Transport | Telecommunication Equipment Maintenance 1 Set

Details: Legal advisory services in connection with the award of local public transport services in the Spn-west line bundle in the Spree-Neisse district/Wokrejs Sprjewja-Nysa. The Spree-Neisse district/Wokrejs Sprjewja-Nysa intends to re-award services for the provision of services in integrated local public road transport in the area of the Spree-Neisse district, with partial services in the areas of the city of Cottbus/Chósebuz and the Dahme Spreewald and Oberspreewald-Lausitz districts. The Spree-Neisse district/Wokrejs Sprjewja-Nysa requires legal support for the preparation and implementation of this award. The correspondingly required services are to be offered for all types of procedure (direct award and functional tendering with negotiated procedure). The requested service includes support throughout the entire process from the conception, planning and implementation of the procedure to the award of the contract, as well as legal advice in possible award review and appeal procedures. The contract will be awarded to the most cost-effective offer, subject to cancellation of the procedure.

Purchaser Name: Department Of Transport And Development Of Road Transport Infrastructure Of The Bishkek City Hall | Carrying out design and survey works for the construction of three objects

Details: Space Systems Command (ssc) International Affairs Office(ssc/ia) Los Angeles Air Force Base, Ca Launch Vehicle And Spaceport Assessment Request For Information primer: Ssc/ia Received A Letter Of Request (lor) For Letter Of Offer And Acceptance (loa) From A Partner Nation (pn). As The Primary Poc For Space Foreign Military Sales (fms), It Is Incumbent Upon Ssc/ia To Respond To The Lor For Loa With Rough Order Of Magnitude (rom) Costs For The Defense Articles And Services Specified In The Lor. As A Result, Ssc/ia Is Conducting Market Research To Respond To The Partner Nation’s Request. please Note: Responses To Lors For P&a Are Non-promissory And Therefore There Is No Guarantee That This Request For Information (rfi) Will Result In A Request For Proposal (rfp). Ssc/ia Anticipates Similar Requests From Other Partner Nations And May Repurpose The Market Research Garnered From This Rfi To Respond To Future Lors For Loa. The Lor For Loa Response Provided To The Partner Nation Does Not Guarantee The Sale Of The Services In Question. 1. Background ssc/iais Seeking Industry Quotes For Acquisition Technical Assistance For Assessing The Requirements And Interfaces Of A Launch System And A Contractor Designed, Developed And Operated Spaceport That Includes Facilities For Launch, Launch Integration, Space Vehicle Processing And Integration, Providing Mission Assurance, And Day-of-launch Activities For The Pn’s Ongoing Military Modernization Effort. Ssc/ia Is Currently Building A Response To An Official Letter Of Request (lor) For Letter Of Offer And Acceptance (loa) To Provide The Pn With A “total Package Approach” Cost For Their Planning Purposes. Ssc Is Seeking Specific Technical Studies Information Described In Sections 6 And 7 Of This Document. The Timeframe Associated With Acquiring The Referenced Technical Assistance Projects Potential Contract Award In 2025 With A Required 18-month Period Of Performance, As Requested By The Pn In Their Lor For Loa. Rfi Responses Shall Include Information That Allows Ssc/ia To Assess Your Ability To Help Develop A Spaceport And Provide Launch Mission Assurance For The Pn. This Includes Providing The Technical Background That Demonstrates Deep Knowledge And Experience As It Relates To The Entirety Of Launch Site Development, Build, And Mission Integration. This Should Include Experience And Knowledge Of Launch System Facilities, Processes/procedures, Safety Requirements (flight And Ground), Logistics (e.g. International Shipping), Security (physical And Cyber), Radio Frequency (rf) Communications And Tracking, And Other Pertinent Information That Describes Your Ability To Provide The Technical Assistance Requested. Finally, Any Tools To Manage Requirements, Provide Mission Assurance Analysis, Develop/manage And Execute Plans Should Be Included. 2.use Of Non-government Advisors the Government Intends To Use U.s. Government Personnel To Review The Rfi Responses. The Government Reserves The Right To Use Contractor Personnel, Including, But Not Limited To, Ssc Federally Funded Research And Development Center (ffrdc) And Systems Engineering And Technical Assistance (seta) Contractors. Contractor Support Will Be Bound By An Appropriate Non-disclosure Agreement (nda) To Protect Proprietary And Sensitive Information. Additional Ndas Will Not Be Required As Responses To This Rfi Will Be Considered An Implicit Acknowledgment And Acceptance That Non-government Advisors Will Be Assisting The Government In The Review Process. 3.guidelines For All Submissions the Rfi Is Market Research And Will Not Result In An Award The Cost Of Preparing The Rfi Responses Is Not An Allowable Direct Charge To Any Government Contract. all Interested Vendors Are Requested To Provide: statement Of The Vendor’s Capability To Provide The Technical Assessment Of A Launch Vehicle And Spaceport Described Below rom Cost To Provide Services/supplies, rom Schedule To Provide Services/supplies. label And Portion-mark Rfi Responses Appropriately; The Overall Classification Of An Rfi Response Should Not Exceed Nato Secret. provide An Initial Plan On How Itar Will Be Addressed. include A Cover Sheet With Company Name, Address, Date, Rfi Response Poc With An Email Address And Phone Number. ssc Will Not Consider Unnecessary Brochures Or Proposals. ssc Will Welcome Proficiency Demonstrations, Use Cases, And Lessons Learned. rfi Responses Will Use 8.5 X 11-inch Portrait Format Pages With Single-spaced Times New Roman 12-point Font With 1" Margins. The Landscape Format Is Acceptable For Charts And Graphs Only. rfi Responses Shall Not Exceed Thirty Pages. rfi Responses Must Be Delivered As Either A Pdf Or Microsoft Word Document. rfi Responses May Be Submitted Electronically Via Nipr To The Ssc Point Of Contact Listed Below. rfi Responses Are Due No Later Than 1700 Pdt On 02/14/2025 To The Ssc Point Of Contact Listed Below. Mr. Keith Brandner, Contracting Officer, Keith.brandner@spaceforce.mil Ms. Melina Monroy-szita, Contract Specialist, Melina.monroy-szita@spaceforce.mil 4.next Steps once The Rfi Responses Are Received, Assessed For Feasibility And Affordability, Ssc/ia Will Reach Out To The Pn. If A Virtual One-on-one Is Requested By The Government For Clarification Of Any Responses, The Government Contracting Office Representative(s) Will Contact The Submitters Poc Listed On The Cover Sheet To Schedule A Virtual Meeting. 5.concepts Criteria for Each Study Area, Address To The Best Extent Possible: requested Criteria expertise To Accurately Assess What Is Being Requested additional Information Needed Form Either The U.s. Government Or Pn associated Risks concepts Cost Details 6.initial Study Overview the Pn Is Requesting Technical Assistance Across Multiple Disciplines To Include But Not Limited To; Mechanical And Electrical Engineering, Systems Engineering (requirements Derivation, Verification And Validation Planning), Launch Site Processes/procedures, Safety (ground And Flight), Logistics (to Include International Shipping, Rf Communications, Facility Requirements (related To Launch Vehicle (lv), Space Vehicle (sv) And Lv/sv Integration), Ground Support Hardware And Lv To Launch Site Interfaces. The Assessment Is Intended To Be Used By The Pn To Understand Feasibility, Requirements (interface Control Document-type Information Between Lv/sv And Spaceport), And Risks Of Standing Up A Spaceport Capability To Launch Pn National Security Payloads. The Study Shall Also Include Support Of Meetings And Discussions As Well As The Delivery Of A Report, And Other Supporting Documentation. 6.1assessing Commercial Launch Provider provide Assessment Of The Commercial Launch To Meet The Mission Requirements Of The Pn’s National Security Space Using U.s. Space Force Evaluation Criteria. Part Of The Assessment Includes Recommended Tailoring Of Said Evaluation Criteria That Aligns With The Goals And Requirements Of The Pn. The Assessment Shall Include Assessment Of Vehicle Performance, The Launch Company’s Processes And Procedures, Its Ability To Follow And Adhere To Its Internal Standards, Capability Of Meeting The Foreign Regulations And Certifications, Accommodate Pn’s Satellites And Meet Their Mass And Orbit Performance. Additionally, The Assessment Should Include Any Identified Risks With The Priority On Technical But Also Identification Of Any Cost And Schedule Risks/concerns That May Be Evident. assessment Includes Identification Of Items That Require A Change To The Standard Commercial Vehicle That Derive From Sources Such As The Pn’s Mission Objectives, Logistics, Foreign Certifications/regulations And Launch Site Interfaces. Finally, An Assessment Of The Launch Contractor To Meet Both Physical And Cyber Security Requirements Imposed Or Unique To The Pn. 6.1.1 Launch Vehicle To Launch Site Icd: provide An Assessment Of The Lv To Launch Site Icd (or Equivalent Document(s)) To Ensure At The System Level The Pn Can Execute A Launch Of A National Security Space Asset From The Launch Site. 6.1.2 Communications: assess The Rf Concept To Ensure That The System Meets The Pn’s Requirements As Well As Any Required Regulatory Requirements. This May Include, But Not Limited To, Launch Vehicle Telemetry Collection, Flight Safety (if Autonomous Flight Safety Is Not Used), And Space Vehicle Separation (if Required). Additionally, Does The Launch Vehicle Provider Have A Plan That Will Meet The Pn’s Security Requirements For Communications, Information Technology (it) Equipment As Well As Assembly, Integration, And Test (ai&t) Equipment. 6.1.3 Launch Site Systems: provide An Assessment Based On The Icd, Ground Support Equipment, And Ground Handling Processes And Procedures That All Equipment Meets Requirements, Capable Of Being Certified And Has Proper Interfaces. Assessment Should Also Include Launch Vehicle And Expected Space Vehicle Commodity Requirements Such As Liquid Nitrogen, Hydrazine, Kerosene, Liquid Oxygen, Etc. The Launch Site Systems Includes Both The Payload Processing Facility And Launch Pad. 6.2launch Vehicle Safety Assessment transportation - Provide An Assessment Of The Launch Vehicle Transportation Plan To Include General Ability To Meet International Shipping Requirements, Physical Security Of Hardware While In Transit And On Launch Site Transportation And Handling. Identify Items That Have Elevated Risk Such As Systems That Have Not Been Tested To Meet Un Shipping Requirements (e.g. Batteries) Or Other Items That May Require Modifications Needed To Ensure Safe Transport Into The Launch Site. In Addition, Provide An Assessment Of The Shipping Hardware To Ensure That It Is Capable Of Shipping The Launch System To Include Compatibility With Shipping Methodology As Well As Protecting Hardware During Shipment. flight – Assess The Launch Vehicle Provider’s Approach To Flight Safety And Identify Any Short Falls That Introduce Risk. If Applicable, Recommend Areas For Tailoring To Reduce New/additional Qualification. 6.3requirements Recommendations work With The Pn To Understand Their Objectives And Risk Tolerance For The National Space Assets. Based On That, And The Assessment Of The Launch Provider And Their Launch Solution, Recommend And Prioritize Requirements To Ensure The Launch Solution Will Meet The Pn’s Mission Objectives. It Is Recognized That This Is A Challenging Task As The Most Efficient Approach Is To Utilize The Standard Launch Vehicle That Is Offered, Using The Requirements Defined In A User’s Guide For Space Vehicles To Design To, And Making Changes Introduces Risks. Provide Your Recommended Approach, Such As Accept A Launch Provider’s Baseline System And Respond To Mission Unique Requirements As Needed, Or Other Solutions. 6.4safety Documentation support The Development Of Safety Documentation That Meets The Pn’s And Launch Authority Requirements. This May Include Identify The U.s. Government / U.s. Space Force Test, Evaluation, And System Safety Documentation That Would Be Applicable To The Pn’s Activities. This May Also Include Recommending Tailored Approaches To Said Documents. If No Existing Documentation Exists In The U.s. Government For The Pn’s Specific Use Case (i.e. Launch Site Location, Launch Vehicle Operating Conditions), Provide A Recommendation Of The Documentation Required. 6.5launch Pad Sustainment Cost Analysis provide An Assessment Of The Launch Site Sustainment Costs. Provide Recommendations Where Efficiencies May Be Achieved As Well As Identifying Any Items Missed To Support The Pn’s Funding Forecast. Based On The Pn’s Mission Concept, Assess Any Unique Capability Needed And The Associated Sustainment. Examples Might Be, But Not Limited To, Pad Spares, Redundant Capability, Automated Tools And Other Hardware/software. 6.6launch Readiness Verification Process support The Development Of A Launch Readiness/certification Process (aligned To The Terminology Of The Pn) That Meets The Risk Acceptance Of The Pn. Recommend Applicable U.s. Space Force Launch Readiness Verification (lrv) Requirements And Procedures For Both Launch Vehicle And Spacecraft And Recommend Tailoring To The Pn’s Requirements. 6.7 Site Surveys support On-site Surveys Of The Pn’s Launch Pad, Range, And Associated Facilities. 6.8requirement Definition Support provide To The Pn General Technical Assistance And Support In Their Requirements Definition Generation For Their Pn National Space Missions. 6.9space Training provide A Catalog Of Space Training Courses Available Through The U.s. Government Or Other Means For Pn To Participate In And Gain A Better Understanding Of Space Knowledge And Operations 6.10technical Interchange Meetings support Technical Interchange Meetings, Planning Conferences, Review Meetings, And Other Relevant Meetings To Be Defined By The Pn. Pn Is Requesting 20 Meetings Per Year (4 In-person, Either In The U.s. Or In The Pn’s Territory, And 16 Virtual). 7. Requirements Mapping Study develop A Requirements Matrix Or Other Traceability Tool That Enables The Ability To Verify And Validate Requirements.

Details: 17jan2025 -this Update Is Being Published For The Below Three Reasons: 1. To Answer Two Bidder Questions. q1: (1) Re: Volume Iii Small Business Participation Plan – If We Commit To Making A Genuine Good Faith Effort To Achieve All Of The Subcontracting Commitments Listed In Our Plan, But Choose To Label Them As “non-enforceable,” As Opposed To “enforceable,” Will This Negatively Impact How Our Proposal Is Evaluated? (2) If We Label Some Or All Of The Commitments As Enforceable, But Fail To Achieve The Set Targets, What Will The Consequences Be? Please Clarify. a1: (1) A “non-enforceable” Subcontracting Commitment Will Not Negatively Impact How A Proposal Is Evaluated. However, An “enforceable” Subcontracting Commitment Will Positively Impact How A Proposal Is Evaluated. As Noted In Subparagraph 3 Of The Small Business Participation Evaluation Provision (see Attachment 7, P. 8), The Small Business Participation Plan Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of The Offeror’s Proposed Subcontracting Participation, The Extent Of Commitment To Use The Subcontractor(s) (enforceable Vs. Non-enforceable Commitments), And The Offeror’s Established Or Planned Procedures For Small Business Outreach And Utilization. Thus, It Would Be Reasonable To Expect That The Contracting Officer Would Rate Proposals Showing A Greater Commitment To Enforceable Subcontracting Participation More Highly Than Similar Commitments Or Goals That Were Not Considered Enforceable. (2) “enforceable” Subcontracting Commitments Will Become Part Of The Terms And Conditions Of The Contract; Therefore, A Breach Of The Terms Of The Contract May Impact Administration Of The Contract, Including The Documentation Of Performance In Cpars And Could Play A Role In Decisions Regarding Termination Or Option Exercise. Additionally, Firms That Are Not Small Businesses And Are Required To File A Subcontracting Plan Should Note The Requirement To Annually Document How They Performed Compared To Their Plan Via The Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (esrs). As Noted In The Small Business Subcontracting Plan Submittal Requirements (attachment 7, P. 5) The Government Will Document Performance Accordingly. q2: Re: Volume Iii Small Business Participation Plan – Do Subcontractors Have To Be Registered In Sam.gov Or Be Certified By Any Particular Certifying Agency? Please Clarify The Eligibility Requirements, If Any. a2: Short Answer, No, They Do Not Have To Be Registered. If You Have The Cage Of A Subcontractor, Please Identify It. However, If The Subcontractor Is Not Registered In Sam, The Procedures From Far 52.219-8(e)(1) May Be Used, Which Say "the Contractor May Accept A Subcontractor's Written Representations Of Its Size And Socioeconomic Status As A Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Veteran-owned Small Business, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business, Or A Women-owned Small Business If The Subcontractor Represents That The Size And Socioeconomic Status Representations With Its Offer Are Current, Accurate, And Complete As Of The Date Of The Offer For The Subcontract." 2. To Upload The Final Version Of Attachment 1, 'attachment 1 - Price Schedulev4.xlsx'. 'attachment 1 - Price Schedulev3.xlsx' Has Been Removed To Reduce The Potential For Confusion. Offerors Must Complete V4 And Submit It With Their Volume I. For Your Awareness, Cells That Have Changed Since The Original Are Highlighted In Yellow, And The Following Three New Clins Were Added To The Schedule: "lp06c2", "lp07c4", And "1005sp, Defoaming Agent For Pumping Of Afff Rinsates. 1 Ea = (1) 5-gal Pail." See Section 2.4 A. Of The Updated Pws For More Details. 3. To Upload A Revised Version Of Attachment 2, 'attachment 2 - Pwsv2.pdf'. This Revised Version Has An Update In Section 2.4 A. For New Clin 1005sp Added To The Price Schedule. *** 10jan2025 -this Update Is Being Published For The Below Three Reasons: 1. To Answer Six Bidder Questions. q1: The 12 Month Order History Shows Very Large Volumes Of Supplies Being Purchased Which Is Not Represented In The New Volumes. Are Supplies Now Being Purchased Under A Separate Contract And This Will Be Used As A Backup? a1: No. This Is The Only Contract Being Used For Supplies. q2: There Was A Very Large Volume Of Alkaline Batteries Shipped Last Year, Well Above The New 30-month Anticipated Volume. Was There An Event That Caused The Higher Volume? a: No Event Is Known. A 30-month Ordering History (not 12-month) From The Current Contract Was Used For The Estimated Quantities On This New Contract. q3: Volume I – In Addition To The Minimum Content Requested In Attachment 7, Page 2 (items A-h), Do You Also Want Information On Our Approach To Performing The Project Work? a3: No Additional Information Is Wanted. Only The Information Requested Will Be Evaluated. q4: Volume Iii – Small Business Participation Plan – Is The 5% Participation Goal For Small Disadvantaged Businesses A Required Subcontracting Obligation Or An Aspirational Target The Awarded Contractor Is Expected To Make A Good Faith Effort To Achieve? a4: It Is A Goal; It Is Not A Required Subcontracting Obligation. q5: Do You Want Us To Provide Fully Burdened Unit Rates For All Line Items To Include Overhead, Profit Margin, Fuel And Insurance Costs, Etc. (everything Except Taxes)? a5: Yes, We Need The Fully Burdened Price. This Will Be A Firm-fixed-priced Contract, So The Only Prices Paid To The Contractor Will Be The Prices On The Price Schedule. q6: Can You Also Provide The Solicitation/contract Number That This Service Was Provided Under? a6: Sp450020r0003 And Sp450020d0011. 2. To Announce The Intent To Upload Another Version Of The Price Schedule. Sadly, A Few More Typos Need To Be Corrrected. Please Be Looking For That To Be Posted Early Next Week. In Addition, More Answers To Questions Received Will Be Posted With That Update. 3. To Extend The Solicitation Deadline To 1500est On Friday, 31jan2025. This Does Not Extend The Cut-off Date For The Receipt Of Offeror Questions, Which Was Fourteen Days Prior To The Original Proposal Due Date, Which Was 06jan2025. Any New Questions Received May Not Receive An Answer. *** 03jan2025 - This Update Is Being Published For The Below Two Reasons: 1. To Answer The Following Bidder Question: Who Is The Incumbent Contractor? Answer:industrial Waste Utilization, Inc., Montclair, Ca 91763. 2. To Upload Another Corrected Version Of Attachment 1, 'attachment 1 - Price Schedulev3.xlsx'. 'attachment 1 - Price Schedulev2.xlsx' Has Been Removed To Reduce The Potential For Confusion. Offerors Must Complete V3 And Submit It With Their Volume I. For Your Awareness, Cells That Have Changes Since The Original Are Highlighted In Yellow. Clins 1095-97sv Were On The Original Price Schedule Twice, So Their Duplicates Have Been Removed In V3. Additionally, Clin 1901sa Has Been Removed And Replaced With Clin 1905sa. *** 02jan2025 - This Update Is Being Published For The Below Two Reasons: 1. To Upload A 12-month Ordering History Report, 'ordering History 25r04.xlsx'. This Spreadsheet Has Two Tabs - One For Waste And One For Services. 2. To Upload A Corrected Version Of Attachment 1, 'attachment 1 - Price Schedulev2.xlsx'. ***now Removed, See Above.*** There Were Two Typos In The Original That Have Been Corrected As Follows:cell C246 Was Changed From Nr96c5 To Nr12c5 And Cell C151 Was Changed From Fl07c34 To Fl07c4. *** special Note: There Is Only One Pdf Document Attached To This Opportunity. Sp450025r0004.pdf Has Nine Additional Attachments Embedded Within That One Document. If You Are Using A Web Browser, Mozilla Firefox May Show The Attachments Within The Web Browser, Chrome May Not Show The Attachments Within The Web Browser. If You Are Using An Adobe App, You May Need To Look For The Paperclip Looking Icon To View The Attachments. *** combined Synopsis/solicitation Sp450025r0004 Has Been Prepared In Accordance With The Procedures In Far 12.603. The Scope Of Work Requires Services To Remove, Transport, Recycle, And Dispose Of Hazardous Waste Located In And Around San Diego, California. The Following Additional Information Is Provided In Accordance With Far 12.603(c)(2). (i) This Is A Combined Synopsis/solicitation For Commercial Items Prepared In Accordance With The Format In Subpart 12.6, As Supplemented With Additional Information Included In This Notice. This Announcement Constitutes The Only Solicitation; Proposals Are Being Requested And A Written Solicitation Will Not Be Issued. (ii) Solicitation Sp450025r0004 Is Issued As A Request For Proposal (rfp). (iii) This Solicitation Document And Incorporated Provisions And Clauses Are Those In Effect Through Federal Acquisition Circular 2025-01 Effective November 12, 2024. (iv) This Acquisition Is Being Issued As A Full And Open Procurement; The Associated Naics Code Is 562211; The Small Business Size Standard Is $47m. (v) See Attachment 1 For The Price Schedule. (vi) See Attachment 2 For The Performance Work Statement (pws) And A Description Of The Requirement. (vii) The Contract Is Anticipated To Have A 30-month Base Period From March 2025 To September 2027 And A 30-month Option Period. See Attachment 3 For A List Of Pickup Locations. (viii) The Provision At Far 52.212-1, Instructions To Offerors -- Commercial, Applies To This Acquisition. See Attachment 7 For Addenda To The Provision. (ix) The Provision At 52.212-2, Evaluation -- Commercial Items, Applies To This Acquisition. See Attachment 7 For Addenda To The Provision. (x) Offerors Are Advised To Include A Completed Copy Of The Provision At Far 52.212-3, Offeror Representations And Certifications -- Commercial Items, Alternate I, With Your Offer. (xi) The Clause At 52.212-4, Contract Terms And Conditions -- Commercial Items, Applies To This Acquisition. (xii) The Clause At 52.212-5, Contract Terms And Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or Executive Orders -- Commercial Items, Applies To This Acquisition. See Attachment 7 For 52.212-5 Clauses Applicable To This Acquisition. (xiii) See Attachment 7 For Additional Clauses, Contract Terms And Conditions. (xiv) The Defense Priorities And Allocations System (dpas) Is Not Applicable. (xv) Proposalsaredueby1830 Eston January 20, 2025. Proposals Shall Be Emailed To Andrea.tichenor@dla.mil And Hazardouscontractswest@dla.mil. (xvi) Offerors Must Submit All Questions Regarding This Solicitation In Writing Via Email To Andrea Tichenor At Andrea.tichenor@dla.mil. The Cut-off Date For The Receipt Of Offeror Questions Is 06jan2025. Questions Received After That Time May Not Receive An Answer. *sp450025r0004 Attachments: attachment 1 - Price Schedule attachment 2 - Performance Work Statement (pws) attachment 3 - Pickup Locations attachment 4 - Ktr Work Surveillance Checklist Placement Or Removal Empty Rob Or Vac Box attachment 5 - Ktr Work Surveillance Checklist Ics attachment 6 - Dla Form 2505 attachment 7 - Addenda To Far 52.212-1 & 52.212-2, Additional Contract Terms & Conditions attachment 8 - Past Performance Information (ppi) Questionnaire attachment 9 - Provision Fill-ins other Document Contained Within The Contract: Department Of Labor Wage Determination (1996-0223) Revision 63, Dated 07/22/2024, Https://sam.gov/wage-determination/1996-0223/63.

Details: The subject of the public contract is the continuous supply of laboratory mice and rats, including packaging, transport and care of animals during transport from authorized suppliers of experimental animals, documents and further according to other tender conditions for the Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, VVI. The public contract is divided into 2 separate parts: Part 1 of the public contract - Laboratory Rodents I Part 2 of the public contract - Laboratory Rodents II The supplier is entitled to submit a bid for one or both parts of the public contract. A separate framework contract will be concluded for each part of the public contract with one supplier whose offer will be evaluated as the most economically advantageous, for a period of 24 calendar months from the date of entry into force of the framework contract or until the total maximum price for the subject of performance of each part of the public contract, which corresponds to the estimated value of each part of the public contract, is exhausted, whichever is the earlier.