Hvac Tenders

Details: Page 2 Of 2 description: This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For The Establishment Of An Architect-engineering (a-e) Contract With Services To Be Performed At The Salem Va Medical Center At 1970 Roanoke Blvd, Salem, Va 24153. This Requirement Is Being Executed Under A 100% Set-aside To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms. This Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal; No Solicitation Package Will Be Issued Until After An Evaluation Has Been Made On The Provided Sf-330s. The Sf-330 Can Be Downloaded Through The Gsa Forms Library At: Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/top, Scroll Down To Locate And Click On The Sf-330 Hyperlink Entitled, Architect-engineer Qualifications. Interested Firms Should Submit Their Current Sf-330, Parts I And Ii, To Chanel.johnson@va.gov. The Sf-330s Are Due No Later Than 9:00 Am, Est, February 18, 2025. scope Of Work: intent provide Professional Engineering Services To Include Option Analysis, Phasing Design, Investigative Surveys And Reports, Planning, Consultation And Visits, Design Work, Preparation Of Contract Drawings And Specifications, Preparation Of Cost Estimates And Provision Of Construction Period Services As Necessary For Project 658-24-109 Renovate Patient Restrooms, At Vamc Salem, Virginia. The Restrooms Identified For Renovation Shall Be Brought Up To Department Of Veterans Affairs (va) Standards And Specifications As Well As The Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility (abaa) Standards. There Are 18 Restrooms Currently Planned To Be In The Scope Of This Project. The Va Will Review The Cost Estimate At The Design Development Stage And Confirm Or Alter The List Of Restrooms. In No Case Will New Restrooms Be Added To The Scope But One Or More May Be Removed If Necessary To Meet The Available Funding.   The Project Intent Is To Develop A Complete Design Package That Addresses All Va And Abaa Requirements On Restrooms In Building 143. Restrooms To Be Brought Up To Standards Typically Require Expansion And Complete Renovation Of All Finishes And Fixtures. design Efforts Shall Include: conduct A Site Investigation Of All Identified Restrooms In Building 143. Identify Nonconformance Issues Using The Requirements Of All Applicable Va Standards And Specifications, And Of The Abaa Standards. utilizing A Rating Or Scoring System, Identify The Restrooms That Are Priority Based On Greater Nonconformity With Standards. Ratings / Scoring Shall Be Documented In A Schedule Such That The Construction Can Be Phased Accordingly. For The Design Development (60%) Submission Review, The Va Will Review The Cost Estimate Submission And Confirm Or Alter The Restrooms That Will Be In Scope. provide A Recommendation For Va Personnel To Follow Up, Regarding Requirements Of The Abaas For Wheelchair Accessible Toile Rooms In Existing Buildings. Specifically, Use F202 Existing Buildings And Facilities, Paragraph F213.2, Exception Number 4 To Determine Whether Va Policy And Requirements For Renovations May Take Advantage Of This Exception, And Recommend Methods To Comply To Include: provision Of Two Wheelchair Accessible Unisex Single Use Toilet Rooms Per Floor. Recommend Other Renovations As Needed Such As Grab Bars And Clearance Of Fixtures, For The Other Single Use Toilet Rooms On Each Floor. make A Recommendation On Whether To Provide On Each Floor One Wheelchair Accessible Unisex Single Use Toilet Room, And One Ambulatory Accessible Toilet Room Of A Lesser Minimum Square Footage. examine Whether On The First Floor, The Single Use Toilet Rooms Constitute A Cluster Of Single Use Toilet Rooms And Are Therefore Subject To A Minimum Of 50% Wheelchair Accessible. examine Potential Benefits Or Impacts On The Basement Floor Of Building 143, Where We Have Identified Five Single Use Toilet Rooms For Renovation. The Benefits To Examine Are The Expected Completion Of Four Wheelchair Accessible Toilet Rooms With More Than One Toilet (two Men S And Two Women S), Which Are Being Renovated And Brought Up To Abaas Compliance As Part Of Project# 658-24-104 Renovate Main Lobby. Specifically Make A Recommendation Whether The Completion Of Those Restroom Renovations Will Mean No Other Toilet Rooms Need Be Made Wheelchair Accessible But Only Meet Ambulatory Patient Requirements Such As Space In The Room And Clearance Of Fixtures, Provision Of Grab Bars, Etc. Examine According To The The Requirements Of F213.2 And Exception 4 But Also Any Applicable Va Policies And Standards Which Speak To The Issue. provide A Complete Design Package Which Shall Include Drawings And Construction Specifications To Renovate All Restrooms Included In The Program. In Addition To The Overall Restoration Requirements, The Following Shall Also Be Required: a/e Satisfy The Following Milestones: schematic Design (30%) drawings outline Specifications And A Draft Of The Submittal Register construction Cost Estimate design Development Review Meeting final Design Submission (95%). The Final Design Shall Be Complete, Free Of Errors And Ready In The A/e Firm S Judgment To Be Issued For Construction. The Purpose Of The Review Is A Check For Inadvertent Errors And No Further Design Is Anticipated Other Than Correction Of Errors In The Set. drawings full Specifications And The Submittal Register construction Cost Estimate design Development Review Meeting construction Documents (100%) drawings full Specifications construction Cost Estimate construction Documents Review Meeting . the A/e Shall Complete The Project Design In Accordance With This A/e Scope, With All Applicable Va Standards And Specifications, And With Abaa Standards For Toilet Rooms In Healthcare Facilities Unless Otherwise Approved By The Va. The A/e Shall Retrieve All Va Design Information And Standards From The Va Facilities Web Site (http://www.va.gov/facmgt/standard). The A/e Shall Incorporate These Documents And All National, State And Local Codes Adopted And Used By The Va In The Design Of This Project. All Applicable Standards Shall Be Reflected In The Construction Cost Estimate. The Facility Record Drawings And Autocad Files Are Available For The A/e S Use. Note: Not All Record Drawings Are Available On Autocad. Additionally, The Accuracy Of Facility Record Drawings Must Be Field Verified By The A/e. At A Minimum, The A/e Shall Utilize The Following References, As Applicable, For Planning And Design Purposes. national Cad Standards And Standard Details Pg-18-4 vha Program Guide Pg-18-3 va Master Construction Specifications Pg-18-1 h-18-8 Seismic Design Requirements sanitary Design Manual For Hospital Projects pg-18-13 Barrier Free Design Handbook nfpa Codes design Manuals Pg-18-10 cultural Resource Management D-7545 & H-7545 government-furnished Record Drawings (a/e To Field Verify Conditions) pg-18-15 A/e Submission Requirements. pg-18-12 Design Guides (graphical, By Function) pg-18-14 Room Finishes, Door, And Hardware Schedules facility Guidelines Institute (fgi) american Institute Of Architects (aia) a/e Shall Address The Following Items In The Design: estimate Of Construction Project Costs And Duration Including Simplified Schedule To Include Progress And Final Inspections And All Work Required For The Base Bid And The Bid Alternatives. Revise Cost Estimates And Schedules For Each Design Submittal. access To Buildings Must Remain Adequately Operational And Completely Protected During Site Investigations And Shall Be Phased To Minimize Impacts To Patients During The Construction Process. contractor Shall Comply With All Applicable Records Management Laws And Regulations, As Well As National Archives And Records Administration (nara) Records Policies, Including But Not Limited To The Federal Records Act (44 U.s.c. Chs. 21, 29, 31, 33), Nara Regulations At 36 Cfr Chapter Xii Subchapter B, And Those Policies Associated With The Safeguarding Of Records Covered By The Privacy Act Of 1974 (5 U.s.c. 552a). These Policies Include The Preservation Of All Records, Regardless Of Form Or Characteristics, Mode Of Transmission, Or State Of Completion. the A/e Has Responsibility For Duty To Report Any Fraud, Waste And Abuse Witnessed While On Va Premises To The Integrity And Compliance Officer. the Following Quantities Of Design Review Material Are Required For The Schematic Design, Design Development, Final Design, And Construction Document Submissions: one (1) Full Size, One (1) Half Size, And One (1) Electronic Set (pdf And Autocad 2022 Format) Of The Design Drawings. two (2) Paper Copies And One (1) Electronic Copy (ms Word) Of Sample Edited And Marked-up (track Changes Enabled) Va Master Specifications. two (2) Hardcopy Sets And One (1) Electronic Set Of Final Engineering Calculations. provide Two (2) Hard Copies And One (1) Electronic Copy Each Of The Budgetary Cost Estimate And Preliminary Schedule. in Addition To Those Items Listed Above In Item 5, For The Construction Document Submission The Following Quantities Of Review Materials Are Required. This Submission Shall Include Severable Components And The Overall Project As Described Above: brief Description Of Work For Inclusion In Ifb (microsoft Word), Including Descriptions Of Deductive Alternates And Associated Completion Times. list Of Sole Source Items With Justification (if Applicable). list Of Or-equal Items With Justification (if Applicable). schedule: overall Period Of Performance: 210 Days From The Notice To Proceed. site Investigation Report Is Due 45 Calendar Days From The Notice To Proceed. schematic Design (30%) Submission Is Due 45 Calendar Days From The Receipt Of The Site Investigation Report the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. design Development (60%) Submission Is Due 30 Calendar Days From The Date Schematic Design Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. final Design (95%) Submission Is Due 30 Calendar Days From The Date Design Development Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. construction Documents Submission Is Due 15 Calendar Days From The Date Full Design Review Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Accept The Construction Documents Within Five Calendar Days Of Receipt, Or Will Require Re-submission Of The Construction Documents If There Are Remaining Comments That Have Not Been Adequately Addressed. any Delays To The Schedule Due To Re-submissions That May Be Required Upon Government Review, Is The Responsibility Of The A/e And Shall Not Result In A Claim For Delay. evaluation Factors For Award the Government Will Award A Contract Resulting From This Solicitation To The Responsible Offeror Whose Offer Conforming To The Solicitation Will Be Most Advantageous To The Government, And Other Factors Considered. Boards Will Evaluate Firms' Qualifications Strictly On The Basis Of The Announced Selection Criteria And Their Stated Order Of Importance. The Criteria Will Be Applied As Follows: part I Technical Capability the Following Criteria Will Be Used To By A Selection Board To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms In Respect To Their Technical Capability. Technical Capability Will Be Evaluated Based On The Following Factors: specialized Experience And Technical Competence (far 36.602-1(a)(2)). Offerors Will Be Evaluated Based On The Specialized Experience Of A Firm On Similar Projects And The Technical Capabilities (such As Design Quality Management Procedures, Cadd/bim, And Equipment Resources,) Of The Prime Firm And Any Subcontractors. Evaluation Will Be Based On The Information Presented In The Architect-engineer Qualifications - Standard Form 330 (sf330). A Maximum Of Five (5) Example Projects May Be Submitted For Consideration Under Sf330, Part I, Section F. Example Projects Should Be Designs Completed Within Six (6) Years Of Solicitation Closing Date. professional Qualifications (far 36.602-1(a)(1)). A Board Will Evaluate, As appropriate, The Education, Training, Registration, Certifications (see Paragraph 3-4.d(4)), Overall And Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm Of The Key Management And Technical Personnel. This Criterion Is Primarily Concerned With The Qualifications Of The Key Personnel And Not The Number Of Personnel, Which Is Addressed Under The Capacity Criterion. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered As Required By Far 36.609-4 And 52.236-25 But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. capacity (far 36.602-1(a)(3)). A Firm S Capacity Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Experience With Similar Size Projects, The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time, And A Primary Design Schedule. The Volume Of Work Awarded During The Previous 12 Months, Based On Data Extracted From The Federal Procurement Data System, Will Be Considered When Evaluating Capacity. Additionally, The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts That A Firm Has Been Awarded Will Be Considered When Evaluating Capacity. knowledge Of The Locality (far 36.602-1(a)(5)). Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Knowledge Of The Locality Such As Knowledge Of Local Historical Features, Climatic Conditions, And Local Construction Methods That Are Unusual Or Unique To The Area. design Quality Control Plan. Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Approach To Ensure Technical Quality And Accuracy Of Work Products. A Firm's Approach To Resolve Issues Of Quality Will Be Analyzed To Determine Its Ability To Provide Quality Design Products. Describe And Define The Processes Of The Firm's Quality Control Plan And List, By Name And Position, All Key Personnel Responsible For Its Execution. Quality Control Information Shall Also Address Safety Measures Particularly With Respect To Field Work And Site Investigations. Information Describing Quality Management May Be Presented In Sf330, Part I, Section H. A Design Quality Control Plan Shall Be Submitted As Part Of The Proposal. experience In Construction Period Services. Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Experience In Providing Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During Construction, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Request For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Preparing Cost Estimates. part Ii Past Performance the Following Criteria Will Be Used To By A Selection Board To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms Based On A Firm S Past Performance. past Performance (far 36.602-1(a)(4)). Firms Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Cpars For Past Projects. part I Technical Capability first, The Technical Capability Of All Offers Will Be Evaluated On An Adjectival Basis. Sub-factors Will Be Weighted Equally, And All Areas Must Have At Least A Satisfactory Rating. evaluators Shall Assign A Rating From The Following Table Based On The Minimum Requirements Stated In Each Sub-factor Section. adjectival Rating definitions exceptional meets All Requirements And Exceed Majority Of Requirements. Overall The Proposal Meets And Significantly Exceeds, In All Aspects, The Standards For Evaluation: Very High Probability Of Success: No Significant Weaknesses. very Good meets All Requirements And Exceed Some Requirements. The Proposal Meets And, In Some Cases, Exceeds The Standards For Evaluation; High Probability Of Success; No Significant Weaknesses And Only Minor Correctable Deficiencies. satisfactory the Proposal Meets The Standard For Evaluation; Good Probability Of Success; Only Minor Weaknesses And Correctable Deficiencies. marginal lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Of The Standards For Evaluation; Low Probability Of Success; Major Weaknesses And/or Uncorrectable. unacceptable lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Or All Of The Standards For Evaluation; Need Major Revision To A New Submission To Make If Acceptable Or May Contain Uncorrectable Deficiencies. sub-factor 1 Specialized Experience And Technical Competence criteria: This Factor Will Evaluate The Offeror S Technical Competence, Based On Successful Completion Of Projects, In The Design Of Fire Protection Systems In A Hospital Environment. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) Examples Of Their Choice Of Completed Projects Or In Progress Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000). In Describing The Experience, Provide The Following Information: project Title, Location And Brief Description Including The Building Use (medical Facility, Etc) And Contracting Method (design Build, Design Bid Construct, Cm At Risk, Turnkey, Etc). project Owner And Name And Telephone Number Of Owner S Contact Person. indicate Your Firm S Role As A Prime Contractor Or Subcontractor, Etc. project Prime Contractor And Major Subcontractors And Name And Telephone Number Of Contact Person(s). project Statistics Including Start And Completion Dates (original Vs. Actual) For Design; Cost (with Brief Explanation Of What Is Included In The Cost); Square Footage; And Any Awards (prizes) Received. sub-factor 2 Professional Qualifications criteria: This Factor Evaluates The Offerors Specific Experience And Qualifications Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Offeror Must Provide The Resumes For The Following Key Personnel Purposed For Assignment To The Project: project/design Manager: Must Have A Minimum Of Five (5) Years Experience Successfully Managing Design Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. electrical Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Two (2) Years Experience Designing Electrical Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. mechanical Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Hvac Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. civil Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Hvac Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. architect: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above bim Manager: Must Have A Minimum Two (2) Years Experience Managing The Design Of Projects Using Building Information Modeling Software. other Disciplines Proposed By The Offeror: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Successfully Designing Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. all Resumes Must Include The Following Information And May Not Exceed Two (2) Pages Per Resume, And Must Explain How The Proposed Key Personnel S Experience Meets The Minimum Qualification Requirements For This Contract, As Described Above: name And Title project Assignment name Of Firm With Which Associated sub-factor 3 Capacity criteria: This Factor Will Evaluate The Offeror S Ability To Perform Both The Design And Construction Period Services. The Offeror Shall Demonstrate That Is Has The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. Additionally, The Offeror Shall Show That It Can Perform The Required Site Investigations, Design Services, And Construction Period Services Without Adversely Affecting The Project Schedule. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides: offeror Must Specify The Total Volume Of Work Awarded To The Firm Within Twelve (12) Months Of Solicitation Closing And Provide A Proposed Design Schedule Not To Exceed 215 Calendar Days. Prepare And Submit A Practicable Design Schedule Laying Out All Necessary Performance Elements Needed To Complete This Project Identified In The Solicitation In The Proposed Period Of Performance. The Schedule Must Be In The Form Of A Progress Chart Of Suitable Scale To Indicate Appropriately The Percentage Of Work Scheduled For Completion By Any Given Date During The Performance Period. In Addition, The Schedule Must Be Submitted In The Microsoft Project Format. Offerors Should Only Include The Work Elements Necessary To Complete The Required Work. It Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Identify All Necessary Project/work Elements And The Proposal Adequately Identifies Acceptable Critical Path Elements. sub-factor 4 Knowledge Of The Locality criteria: Identify Example Projects That Demonstrate The Firms Knowledge Of The Locality (i.e. Salem Va Medical Center). minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides: firms Shall Demonstrate Knowledge Of Localities Per Example Projects. Knowledge Of The Va Visn 6 Service Area Will Hold Much Higher Weight And Evaluated More Favorably Than Projects Outside The Visn 6 Service Area. General Understanding Of The Local Conditions, Including Physical Environment, Local Engineering Criteria, And Construction Methods Will Be Evaluated. The Following Key Personnel Resumes Shall Also Be Evaluated For Knowledge Of Localities: Project Manager, Architectural, Mechanical, And Electrical. The Basis Of Evaluation For This Criterion Will Focus On The Information Provided In Sf330, Part I, Section E (resume Of Key Personnel), Section F (example Projects), And Section H (additional Information) That Provides Additional Information Describing Same/similar Qualifications As Deemed Relevant To Performance At The Salem Va Medical Center sub-factor 5 Design Quality Control Plan criteria: The Plan Shall Identify Personnel, Design Review Procedures, Site Investigation/confirmation Of Existing Conditions Plan, Tests Proposed, And Forms To Be Used. A Finalized, More Detailed Design Quality Control Plan (qcp) Will Be Required To Be Submitted And Approved After Contract Award. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standards Of Acceptability Are Met When The Offeror Provides: a Description Of The Quality Control System, Including A Chart Showing Lines Of Authority And Acknowledgement That The Design Manager Shall Implement Control Measures For Verification Of All Design Activities. the Names, Qualifications (in Resume Format), Duties, Responsibilities, And Authorities Of Each Person Assigned As Design Quality Control (qc) Manager. Any Replacements Must Have Similar Qualifications In Dealing With Projects Of Similar Size And Scope. sub-factor 6 - Experience In Construction Period Services criteria: Identify Example Projects That Demonstrate The Firms Experience Providing Construction Period Services. Will Be Evaluated On Their Experience In Providing Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During Construction, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Request For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Preparing Cost Estimates. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) Examples Of Their Choice Of Completed Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000) For Which Construction Period Services Were Provided. part Ii Past Performance next, The Government Will Evaluate The Offeror S Demonstrated Past Performance Of Projects In Order To Determine The Offeror S Ability To Perform The Contract Successfully And Help Determine Responsibility. As With Technical Capabilities, The Firms Will Be Evaluated With An Adjectival Rating System. adjectival Rating definitions exceptional meets All Requirements And Exceed Majority Of Requirements. Overall The Proposal Meets And Significantly Exceeds, In All Aspects, The Standards For Evaluation: Very High Probability Of Success: No Significant Weaknesses. very Good meets All Requirements And Exceed Some Requirements. The Proposal Meets And, In Some Cases, Exceeds The Standards For Evaluation; High Probability Of Success; No Significant Weaknesses And Only Minor Correctable Deficiencies. satisfactory the Proposal Meets The Standard For Evaluation; Good Probability Of Success; Only Minor Weaknesses And Correctable Deficiencies. marginal lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Of The Standards For Evaluation; Low Probability Of Success; Major Weaknesses And/or Uncorrectable. unacceptable lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Or All Of The Standards For Evaluation; Need Major Revision To A New Submission To Make If Acceptable Or May Contain Uncorrectable Deficiencies. note: Offerors With No Relevant Past Performance History Will Not Be Evaluated Favorably Or Unfavorably On Past Performance And Will Be Given A Neutral Rating. criteria: Offerors Must Provide A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) References Of Their Choice Of Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Building Remodel/renovation; Minimum Construction Threshold Value Of $500,000). The Offeror Must Provide For Each Reference The Reference's Company Name, Pocs, Address, Contact Information To Include Phone Number And E-mail Address, Project Description, Dollar Value And Period Of Performance. The Government Will Consider And Evaluate Offeror's Past Performance Information, To Include The References, Which Are Deemed Recent And Relevant For The Requirements Of This Rfp. recency Assessment: An Assessment Of The Past Performance Information Will Be Made To Determine If It Is Recent. To Be Recent, The Effort Must Be Ongoing Or Must Have Been Performed During The Past 6 Years From The Date Of Issuance Of This Solicitation. Past Performance Information That Fails This Condition Will Not Be Evaluated. relevancy Assessment: An Evaluation Of All Recent Performance Information Obtained To Determine Whether The Provided Design Performed Under Those Contracts Relate To A Similar Size And Scope As Those Required By This Solicitation. In Determining The Relevancy Of Effort Performed Under Individual Past Performance Contracts, The Government Will Consider The Specific Effort Or Portion Consistent With That Proposed By The Prime Contractor And/or Subcontractors. The Past Performance Information Obtained From Sources Will Be Used To Establish The Relevancy Of Past Performance. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) References Of Their Choice Of Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Building Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000) In Which The Offeror Adhered To Period Of Performances. The Offeror Must Provide For Each Reference The Reference's Company Name, Pocs, Address, Contact Information To Include Phone Number And E-mail Address, Project Description, Dollar Value And Period Of Performance. The Government Will Consider And Evaluate Offeror's Past Performance Information, To Include The References, Which Are Deemed Recent And Relevant For The Requirements Of This Rfp. -- End Of Item 8. Evaluation Criteria -- release Of Claims For Delivery Orders: Prior To The Final Payment Under Each Delivery Order Issued Under This Contract Or Prior To Settlement Upon Termination Of The Delivery Order, And As A Condition Precedent Thereto, The A/e Shall Execute And Deliver To The Contracting Officer A Release Of All Claims Against The Government Arising Under Or By Virtue Of This Contract, Other Than Such Claims, If Any, As May Be Specifically Excepted By The A/e From The Operation Of The Release In Stated Amounts To Be Set Forth Therein. upon Completion Of Construction And Incorporation Of All Revisions Required To Complete The Record Drawings, The Following Items Shall Be Submitted: a. 1 Set Of Reproducible Hard Copy As-built Plans (30 X 42 ) Plus An Electronic Set In Autocad Version 2022 (.dwg) And Pdf Format.

Details: Synopsis: project Title: pre-solicitation Notice For Project 657-24-111jc Renovate Ambassador Suite & Main Lobby, Building 1, Saint Louis Va Medical Center John Cochran Division, Saint Louis, Mo. contract Information a. This A/e Services Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act (public Law (pl0582) And Implemented In Accordance With The Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36. Firms Will Be Selected Based On Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Required Work. b. This Procurement Is Restricted To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms. This Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Vaar 836.606-73 As Implemented In Far Subpart 36.6. c. This Is Not A Request For Proposal, And An Award Will Not Be Made With This Announcement. This Announcement Is A Request For Sf 330 S From Qualified Contractors That Meet The Professional Requirements. d. The Selection Criteria For This Acquisition Will Be In Accordance With Far 36.602-1 And Vaar 836.602-1 And Are Listed Below In Descending Order Of Importance. The Completed Sf 330 Will Be Evaluated By The St. Louis Va Medical Center Evaluation Board In Accordance With Far 36.602-5(a) And The Selection Report Shall Serve As The Final Selection List, Which Will Be Provided Directly To The Contracting Officer. The Government Will Not Pay Nor Reimburse Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. e. Award Of Any Resultant Contract Is Contingent Upon The Availability Of Funds. f. No Solicitation Document Is Available And No Other Information Pertaining To Project Scope, Etc. Is Available At This Time. Any Request For Assistance With Submission Or Other Procedural Matters Shall Be Submitted Via Email Only To Abby.monroe2@va.gov And Arnold.payne@va.gov. Personal Visits To Discuss This Announcement Will Not Be Allowed. g. The Naics Codes For This Procurement Is 541310 Architectural Services And Small Business Size Standard Of $12.5m. Award Of A Firm Fixed Price Contract Is Anticipated. The Anticipated Time For Completion Of Design Is Approximately 199 Calendar Days Including Time For Va Reviews. The Estimated Magnitude Of The Resulting Construction Price Range Is Estimated To Be Between $1,000,000 And $5,000,000. h. Database Registration Information: verification Of Status Of Apparently Successful Offeror This Acquisition Is 100% Set-aside For Qualified Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Ae Firms Incompliance With Vaar 852.219-10. Only Businesses Verified And Listed In The Small Business Administration (sba) Registry Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov, Shall Be Considered. system For Award Management (sam): federal Acquisition Registrations Require That Federal Contractors Register In The System For Award Management (sam) Database At Www.sam.gov And Enter All Mandatory Information Into The System. Award Cannot Be Made Until The Contractor Has Registered. Offerors Are Encouraged To Ensure That They Are Registered In Sam Prior To Submitting Their Qualifications Package. j. The Excluded Parties List System (epls): to Ensure That The Individuals Providing Services Under The Contract Have Not Engaged In Fraud Or Abuse Regarding Sections 1128 And1128a Of The Social Security Act Regarding Federal Health Care Programs, The Contractor Is Required To Check The Excluded Parties List System (epls) Located At Www.sam.gov For Each Person Providing Services Under This Contract. Further The Contractor Is Required To Certify That All Persons Listed In The Qualifications Package Have Been Compared Against The Epls List And Are Not Listed. During The Performance Of This Contract The Contractor Is Prohibited From Using Any Individual Or Business Listed On The List Of Excluded Individuals/entities. k. E-verify System: companies Awarded A Contract With The Federal Government Shall Be Required To Enroll In E-verify Within 30 Days Of The Contract Award Date. They Shall Also Need To Begin Using The E-verify System To Confirm That All Of Their New Hires And Their Employees Directly Working On Federal Contracts Are Authorized To Legally Work In The United States. E-verify Is An Internet-based System That Allows An Employer, Using Information Reported On An Employee's Form I-9, To Determine The Eligibility Of That Employee To Work In The United States. There Is No Charge To Employers To Use E-verify. (far 52.222-54) l. A/e Firms Are Required To Respond If Interested By Submitting One (1) Completed Standard Form 330 Qualification Package Parts I And Ii To Include All Consultants (form Available On-line At: Https://www.gsa.gov/system/files/sf330-21.pdf). Must Include In Part I Section H An Organizational Chart Of The Firm (excludes Consultants) And A Design Quality Management Plan. Submission Information Incorporated By Reference Is Not Allowed. All Submissions Shall Be Made Electronically. m. Completed Package Shall Be Delivered Electronically On Or Before 1/17/2025 At 3:00pm Central Standard Time To The Nco 15 Contracting Office, Attn: Arnold Payne, Contracting Officer @ Arnold.payne@va.gov And Abby Monroe, Contract Specialist @ Abby.monroe2@va.gov. project Information the Mission Of The Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care System (vastlhcs) Is To Provide The Highest Quality Health Care To Our Nation S Veterans. In Order To Accomplish This Mission, Vastlhcs Facility Engineering Service (fes) Intends To Partner With An A/e Firm On A Project To 657-24-111jc Renovate Ambassador Suite & Main Lobby, Building 1, John Cochran Division, St. Louis, Mo 63106. Project Will Renovate An Ambassador Entrance, Entrance Corridor, And The Ambassador Suite To Improve Patient And Ada Access To The Building, Fix Moisture And Leaking Issues With The Existing Skylight, Update Finishes, Improve Patient Circulation, And Optimize Space For The Existing Functions Operating In The Area As Well As Correct Hvac And Electrical Deficiencies, And Other Facilities Conditions Assessment Deficiencies Located Within The Area. The Main Entrance Of Bldg. 1 Will Be Updated To Facilitate Visitor Traffic Flow And Experience. The Existing Revolving Door Will Be Replaced With An Airlock Of Sliding And Swinging Doors With Automatic Controls. supplement B scope Of Work: a/e Services Are Required For Schematics, Design Development, Construction Documents, Construction Cost Estimate And Construction Period Services For Project Number 657-24-111jc Renovate Ambassador Suite & Main Lobby, Building 1. This Delivery Order Shall Cover The Following Tasks. a/e Part Two Services Of This Design Project (also Known As Construction Period Services) Includes Responding To Construction Contractor Requests For Information (rfis) During The Solicitation And Construction Phases Of The Construction Project, Attendance At Pre-bid, Post-award And Commissioning Kick Off Construction Project Conferences, Review Of Construction Material Submittals And Shop Drawings, Approximately 5 Site Visits During Construction To Ensure Compliance With The Design Drawings And Specifications, Preparation Of Site Visit Reports, Coordination With Project Commissioning Requirements, Review Of Any Construction Project Modifications For Cost And Technical Acceptability, Attendance In The Final Acceptance Inspection, Preparation Of The Punch List And Preparation Of Record Drawings Of The Completed Construction Project Based On The Construction Contractor S As-built Drawings. The A/e Shall Prepare A Submittal Log To Be Utilized By The Va During Construction Period Services, Maintain Rfi Log And Provide Meeting Minutes For Weekly Construction Meetings Throughout The Duration Of Construction. The A/e Shall Hire A Third-party Commissioning Agent To Commission All Installed Equipment. the Above Paragraphs Constitute A Basic Outline Of The Work To Be Accomplished And In No Way Comprises All The Details For Design Of This Project. The A/e Shall Initiate Detailed Inspection Of The Project Site To Determine The Needs And Conditions For The Design Of This Project. the A/e Shall Be Solely Responsible For The Management, Including All Associated Labor, Equipment, Materials, Mailing Costs, And Inspection, To Meet The Requirements Of The Design Project. The A/e Shall Further Provide Meeting Minutes For All Meetings Held Under This Design Project. general Statement a/e Part One Services (also Known As Design Phase) For This Design Project Includes Site Visit, Field Investigation, Conduct Of Studies And User Interviews To Update Drawings, Specifications And Cost Estimates For All Facets Of Work And Disciplines/trades To Facilitate A Construction Project. This Project Will Renovate Ambassador Suite & Main Lobby, Building 1 2. Design Development: the A/e Firm Shall: a. Meet With Facilities, And Other Personnel Prior To Start Of Design To Determine Detailed Requirements Of Work Involved. b. Work From Existing Building And Site Drawings Furnished By The Va To Develop Project Design. (these Are To Be Used Only As Guidelines); c. Perform Any Necessary On-site Field Investigations To Accomplish Work And To Verify Drawings Provided By The Va; d. Prepare Rough Sketches, If Necessary, To Solve Possible Problems In Design Throughout The Contract; And e. Follow Va Program Guide Pg-08-15 Volume C, And Other Applicable Guidelines To Design The Project. 3. Evaluation Factors: selection Criteria Are In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 36.602-5 And Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 836.602-1.â  Prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf330 Packages Using Additional Pages As Necessary.â  Sf 330 Submissions Including Any Additional Pages Are Not To Exceed Fifty (50) Pages. Each Page Cannot Exceed 81/2 X 11 In Size. qualifications (sf330) Submitted By Each Firm For Project Number: 657-24-111jc Renovate Ambassador Suite & Main Lobby, Building 1 Va Medical Center Saint Louis John Cochran Division Will Be Reviewed And Evaluated Based On The Following Evaluation Criteria Listed Below In Descending Order Of Importance: 1. Professional Qualifications: The Qualifications Of The Individuals Which Will Be Used For These Services Will Be Examined For Experience And Education And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. A/e Firms Shall Have Licensed Professional Architects And Engineers Currently Registered In The State Of Missouri Or In A State Of Which Missouri Has Recognized The Engineering License. The Specific Disciplines Which Will Be Evaluated Are Architects, Civil Engineer, Mechanical Engineers, Electrical Engineers, Structural Engineers, Industrial Hygienists, Estimators, Cad Operators, Project Managers, Leed Consultant, Fire Protection Engineer, And Interior Designer. 2. Specialized Experience And Technical Competence: Provide Detailed Project Information On Any Projects (that Are Complete - Design And Construction) The Proposed Team Has Worked Together On In The Last Five (5) Years. Special Emphasis Will Be Given To Any Medical Facility Related Projects. If The Entire Team Has Not Worked Together Previously, Provide Detailed Project Information That Each Of The Team Members Have Worked On In The Last Three (3) Years With Special Emphasis On Medical Facility Projects. The Project Information Should Include Project Titles, A Short Scope Of Work, Date Of Design Completion, Date Of Construction Completion, Firms Involved, Etc. The A/e Shall Also Describe If They Have Any Experience Completing A Design That Was Started By Another A/e Firm. Provide The Project Title, Scope Of Work, Date Of Design Start For This Team, Percentage Of Design When Accepted By Team And Completion Of Design. 3. Capacity To Accomplish The Work. The General Workload And Staffing Capacity Of The Design Offices Which Will Be Responsible For The Majority Of The Design And The Ability To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time Will Be Evaluated. 4. Past Performance: Nco 15 Will Evaluate Past Performance On Recent And Relevant Contracts With Government Agencies (emphasis On Va Work) And Private Industry In Terms Of Construction Cost Estimating, Cost Control, Quality Of Work, Compliance With Performance Schedules And A Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Due To Improper Or Incomplete Engineering Services (references Required). Project Past Performances That Are Older Than 3 Years Will Receive A Lesser Score Than Those References For Projects Accomplished Within The Past 3 Years. 5. Location Of Design Firm: The Geographic Proximity Of Each Firm To The Location Of The Va Medical Center Will Be Evaluated. The Firm Must Be Capable Of Issuing Stamp Drawings In The State Where The Work Is Performed.â  The Medical Center Is Located At Saint Louis, Va Medical Center, Saint Louis Missouri 63106. 6. Claims And Terminations: Provide Documentation Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Or Terminated Contracts Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services. Provide A Detailed Narrative Of Relevant Projects Within The Last 5 Years That Have Claims Against The Organization Or Have Been Terminated By The Owner. Include The Circumstances, Cost, And Schedule Impacts To Involved Parties, And Outcomes Of The Claims And/or Terminations. They Will Be Examined.

Details: Presolicitation Notice This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice, This Not A Request For Proposals. This Is A Request For Sf-330 Architect/engineer Qualification Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Packages Or Technical Information Will Be Issued In This Phase. Site Visits Will Not Be Arranged During This Phase. Architect/engineering (a/e) Design Services Project: 521-25-104 | Remove Abandoned Equipment From Sub-basement And Mechanical Rooms Project Location: Birmingham Va Medical Center, 700 19th Street South, Birmingham, Al., 35233 Period Of Performance: 160 Days. Estimated Magnitude Of Construction: Between $1,000,000 And $2,000,000. Naics: 541330 Engineering Services. Size Standard: $25.5 Million. Set-aside: 100% Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb). The Department Of Veteran Affairs Network 7 Contracting Office Is Seeking Qualified Architect-engineering (ae) Firms To Submit Standard Form 330 (sf 330) Architect/engineering Statement Of Qualifications For Project # 521-25-104 | Remove Abandoned Equipment From Sub-basement And Mechanical Rooms | Birmingham Va Medical Center Facilities In Network 7 (state Of Alabama). Firms Submitting Qualification Packages Must Be Fully Licensed To Perform Designs As A Registered Professional Ae Firm In The United States To Be Considered For This Opportunity. Also, See Geographic Location Restriction In Paragraph 5 Of This Notice. Network Contracting Office (nco) 7 Va Facility Locations Include: Birmingham Va Medical Center, 700 19th Street South, Birmingham, Al., 35233. This Acquisition Is 100% Set-aside For Small Disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb). Prospective Contractors Are Cautioned That Proposal Submitted In Response To This Solicitation Must Meet The Criteria Identified By 38cfr, Part 74. The Sdvosb Concern Agrees That In The Performance Of The Contract, The Concern Will Comply With The Limitation On Subcontracting Requirements In Accordance With Vaar Clause 852-219-73 (jan 2023) (deviation), Va Notice Of Total Set-aside For Verified Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses. For A Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) To Be Considered As A Prospective Contractor, The Firm, Including Joint Ventures, Must Be Verified And Registered In The Vetcert (veterans.certify.sba.gov) And Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) At Time Of Submission Of Their Qualification And Reporting To Vets - 4212 Federal Contractor Reporting In Accordance With Far 52.222-37, Employment Reports On Veterans At The Following Website: Dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212. Failure Of A Prospective Sdvosb To Be Verified By The Veteran Small Business Certification At The Time The Sf 330 Is Submitted Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration. All Joint Ventures Must Be Cve Verified At Time Of Submission And Submit Agreements That Comply With 13 Cfr 125.15 Prior To Contract Award. Contract Overview A Firm Fixed Price A/e Design Service Contract Is Contemplated For Project 521-25-104 | Remove Abandoned Equipment From Sub-basement And Mechanical Rooms. The Estimated Magnitude Of Construction For This Project Is Between $1,000,000 And $2,000,000. The Estimated/target Design Completion Period Is 160 Calendar Days After Issuance Of Notice To Proceed. The Naics Code For This Acquisition Is 541330, Engineering Services With A Size Standard Of $25.5 Million. Project Scope: The A/e Team, Including Architects, Engineers, Surveyors, And Professional Consultants Shall Provide Complete Design Services For The Development Of Specifications And Drawings For Project 521-25-104 Remove Abandoned Equipment From Sub-basement And Mechanical Rooms. This Project Is To Remove Abandoned Pieces Of Equipment Such As Heat Exchangers, Air Dryers, Pumps, Etc. And All Associated Piping From Sub-basement And Mechanical Rooms Throughout The Facility. This Project Will Additionally Remove Abandoned Electrical Feeders And Concrete Pads. Work May Include, But Is Not Limited To, Architectural, Electrical, Hvac, Fire Protection And Plumbing. Systems Impacted May Include Fire Alarm, Security Access Systems, And Med Gas. Due To The Requirement For Site Visits And Coordination On Design Reviews, A/e Firms Will Be Required To Attend Various Meetings In Person On Site At Birmingham, Al Vamc Facilities. Due To This Requirement, The Area For Consideration For This Acquisition Is Restricted To A/e Firms With An Operating Office Located Within 400 Miles Of Birmingham Va Medical Center, 700 19th Street South, Birmingham, Al., 35233. Eligible Prime Contractor Firms Must Have A Main And/or Branch Office Geographically Located Within The 400-mile Driving Distance. Determination Of Mileage Eligibility Will Be Based On Upon Www.google.com/maps. Selection Criteria. The A/e Source Selection Team Shall Utilize The Following Selection Criteria Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. Professional: Professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service And Working Together As A Team (in-house And/or Consultants(s)). Note: The Firm And A/e On Staff Representing The Project Or Signing Drawings In Each Discipline Must Be Registered/licensed To Practice In The United States Provide Your Information On The Sf 330 Clearly Marked By Providing A Current Architect And/or Engineering License Numbers And Proof Of Licensure. The Va Will Confirm The Individuals Are Current And In Good Standing With The Respective State Licensing Board.â Specialized: Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required, Including But Not Limited To: Architecture, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Fire Protection, Abatement/industrial Hygiene, Cost Estimation, Project Management And Where Appropriate, Experience In Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials. Include Government And Private Experience On Similar Projects. Capacity: Capacity To Accomplish Work In The Required Time. This Factor Evaluates Firm's Experience With Similar Size Projects And The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines When Evaluating The Capacity Of A Firm To Perform The Work In The Required Time. The General Workload And Staffing Capacity Of The Design Office Will Be Evaluated. List Current Projects With Similar Design Fee Being Designed In The Firms Office. Indicate The Firms Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Sub-consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period; Describe Experience In Successfully Delivering Projects Per Performance Schedule, Providing Timely Construction Support, And Successfully Completing Multiple Projects With Similar Delivery Dates. Past Performance: Cpars Data Or Past Performance Questionnaires Must Be Provided For Projects Submitted Under Factor 2 (specialized Experience). Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. Past Performance As It Relates To Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. The Following Information Is Required For All Projects: Contract/task Order Number, Project Title, Prime Firm, Start Date, And Completion Date. Evaluations May Also Include Additional Performance Related From The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. Past Performance Will Be Evaluated On Recent And Relevant Contracts With Government Agencies Or Private Industry. Recent Is Defined As Performance Occurring Within 5 Years Of The Date Of This Notice, Except That Ongoing Projects Must Have Begun No Less Than One (1) Year Prior To The Issuance Of This Notice. Relevancy Is Defined As Performance Of Work On Projects That Are Similar In Scope To The Types Of Projects Anticipated Under The Resultant Contracts. Respondents With No Previous Past Performance Shall State This When Addressing The Selection Criteria. Where There Is No Record Of Past Performance, The Proposal Will Be Evaluated Neither Favorably Nor Unfavorably. Location: Knowledge Of The Locality, To Include Specific Knowledge Of Certain Local Conditions Or Project Site Features, Such As Geological Features, Climatic Conditions, Local Construction Methods, Construction Firms And Trades Labor Availability, And Local Laws And Regulations. That Your Proximity To The General Geographical Area Enables You To Respond To Emergency Calls In Person Within 24 Hours If Required. (sf 330 Submittal Should Show Your Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Project.) Eligible Prime Contractor Firms Must Have A Main And/or Branch Office Geographically Located Within The 400-mile Radius. Distance Will Be Determined By Google Maps. Commitment: The Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors. Construction Period Services: Experience In Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work, And Cost Estimates. Reputation: Standing/reputation Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. Mention Applicable Awards, Outstanding Merits, And Recommendations. Additional Experience: Specific Experience And Qualifications Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project. Selection Procedures. This Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act Of 1972, Federal Acquisition Regulation 36.6 (far) And Va Acquisition Regulation 836.6 (vaar) And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) 836.6. Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting A Qualifying Sf 330, Before The Closing Date And Time, Will Be Considered For Initial Selection Evaluation. Following Initial Evaluation Of The Sf330s Received Three Or More Firms That Are Considered The Most Highly Qualified To Provide The Type Of Services Required Will Be Selected For Interviews. Selected Firms Will Be Notified By Telephone Or Email Of Selection And Provided Further Instructions. Selection And Evaluation Of Firms Shall Be Made Based On Sf 330 Submissions And Direct Responses To The Selection Criteria Identified Herein. Failure To Address All Selection Criteria Will Result In A Decreased Rating. Evaluating Past Performance And Experience May Include Information Provided By The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Contracting Officer Knowledge Of Current Project Performance. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Could Result In A Firm Being Removed From Consideration. If Relevant Cpars Evaluation(s) Are Available, Report(s) Shall Be Submitted With The Completed Sf330 Package. If There Is Not A Completed Cpars Evaluation, The Ppq Included With This Notice Is Provided For The Offeror Or Its Team Members To Submit For Each Project Included In Criterion (2). Official Cpars Evaluation(s) Found In In Government Databases Will Take Precedence. Completed Ppqs Should Be Submitted With Your Sf330. Firms That Design Or Prepare Specifications In Conjunction With This Contract Are Prohibited From Participating On Any Future Construction Contracts Based On Those Documents. All Projects Identified On The Sf330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. Submission Requirements. The Sf 330 Form May Be Downloaded From Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/sf. Completed Sf 330 S Shall Include The Primary Firms, Subcontractor Firms And Any Consultants Expected To Be Used On The Project. Do Not Submit Information Incorporating By Reference. Prospective Firms Shall Address All Selection Criteria Factors Within Their Submitted Sf330 Packages. The Following Format Should Be Used: Cover Page With Solicitation Number, Project Title. Table Of Contents. Sf 330. Acceptability Under Other Appropriate Evaluation Criteria, I.e., Sf 330, Section H. Copy Of Current A/e State Engineer/architect License. Unique Entity Id (uei). Tax Id Number. The E Mail Address And Phone Number Of The Primary Point Of Contact. Sf 330 Date Of Receipt/due Date: Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit One (1) Electronic Sf 330 And Attachments (as Applicable) No Later Than 01/21/2025 At 1:00 P.m. Et. Email Capacity Is Limited To Ten (10) Megabytes (mbps). All Sf330 Submittals And Questions Must Be Sent Electronically To The Attention Of Contracting Officer Gregory Snyder, Gregory.snyder@va.gov. Please Also Copy Ryan.crispin@va.gov And Joseph.osborn@va.gov In Emailed Sf 330 Package. Please Include The Pre-solicitation Number, Project Title, And Firm Name In Subject Line Of Email. When Submitting Sf330s, If More Than One Email Is Sent, Please Number Emails In Subjects As 1 Of __ . Submittals Received After The Date And Time Identified On Page One (1) Will Not Be Considered. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Be Negatively Evaluated. Facsimile Submittals Will Not Be Accepted. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf330. The Sf-330 Including Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information Shall Not Exceed A Total Of 50 Pages In A Common Font Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. The Proposal Shall Be Submitted As A Single Application-generated (not Scanned), Searchable Pdf Document. A Page Is Defined As Each Face Of An 8.5 X 11-inch Sheet Of Paper Containing Information. The Page Limitation Does Not Apply To The Licenses, Contract Performance Evaluations, (i.e., Cpars) And Award Documentation. This Information Should Be Provided As Attachments To The Sf 330. All Questions Regarding This Announcement Must Be Emailed To The Contracting Officer Gregory.snyder@va.gov No Later Than 01/14/2025 By 1:00 P.m. Et. Site Visits Will Not Be Arranged During This Phase. This Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For Architect/engineering (a/e) Design Services; No Solicitation Package Will Be Issued Until After An Evaluation Has Been Made On The Provided Sf-330. Only The A/e Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting An Sf330 Package On Time Will Be Considered For Initial Evaluation.

Details: Amendment 0001 - The Due Date For Qualifications Has Been Extended To Monday, January 13, 2025, 2:00pm Est. Government Responses To Rfi's Have Been Attached To This Notice. description: this Is A Request For Qualifications For Architect And Engineering (a&e) Services. This Request Is 100% Set-aside For Small Business’s Registered Under The Applicable Naics Code 541330 – Engineering Services, With A Size Standard Of $25,500,000. the National Institute Of Standards And Technology (nist), An Agency Of The U.s., Department Of Commerce, Intends To Award Multiple Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (idiq) Contract(s) For General Architectural And Engineering (a/e) Services For The Nist Gaithersburg Campus Located At 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Md 20899. A/e Services Under The Contract May Include The Following: evaluation And Feasibility Studies To Include Engineering Modeling And Simulation demolition Of Nist Structures, Utilities, And Infrastructure repair And/or Repair By Replacement, Modification/reconfiguration, Building Additions, And Upgrades To Nist Facilities (e.g., Laboratories/scientific Research, Office, Industrial). Including But Not Limited To Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Communications, Structural, Fire Protection, And Building Enclosure (e.g., Roofs, Windows, Foundations). repair And/or Repair By Replacement, Modification/reconfiguration For Campus Utility Systems And Supporting Underground Structures comprehensive Historical Assessments For The Preservation, Rehabilitation, And Restoration Of Historic Property interior Design Services Consisting Of Programming And Space Assessment, Fit Plans, And Office Furniture To Enhance Aesthetics, Comfort, Efficiency, And Workplace Safety. cost Estimating For Different Levels (e.g., Concept, Detailed Program, Project) life Cycle Cost Analysis Identifying Cost Elements From Initial Concept Through Operations, Support, And Disposal. hazardous Material Survey And Risk Assessment (e.g., Asbestos, Mold, Lead Paint) roofing And Waterproofing Services Such As Visual Inspections And Existing Conditions Surveys, Failure Investigation, And Design For Repairs. commissioning Design Including Assistance Of Development Owner’s Project Requirements (opr), Design Document Reviews, Development Of Commissioning Specifications And Or Initial Commissioning Plan program Of Requirements (por) Development By Meeting With Campus Personnel And Confirming Design Intent For Building And/or Major Systems (e.g., Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Structural, Controls, Security, Fire Alarm, Etc.) value Engineering Analysis To Achieve Design Goals While Lowering Life Cycle Costs And Maintaining The Required Performance, Quality, Reliability, And Maintainability. record Drawings Development From Compiled As-built Set. surveying (e.g., Alta/ascm, Boundary, Topographic, Construction, Site Planning) roads/sidewalks Repairs And Replacement evaluation Of Items Requiring Earthwork Such As Excavation, Grading, Ponds, Drainage, Foundation, And Footings landscaping Design gates, Fencing, And Related Engineering Necessary To Support A Campus Environment permit Applications Submission To Regulatory Authorities Based On Specific Project Requirements. To Be Coordinated With Cor And Or Ahj For Acceptance And Or Approval environmental Compliance (state Or Federal) Conforming To Laws, Regulations, Standards, And Other Requirements construction Quality Management To Include But Not Limited To Commissioning Services contract Information: the Period Of Performance Of The Idiq Contract(s) Shall Be Five (5) Years. Annual Fully Burdened Labor Rates Will Be Negotiated Prior To Award. All Services Will Be Ordered Via The Issuance Of Individually Negotiated Firm-fixed-price Or Not­to-exceed Task Orders, Ranging In Value From $10,000 And $2,000,000. Each Idiq Contract Shall Include A Guaranteed Minimum Order Of $5,000. The Cumulative Amount Of All Task Orders Shall Not Exceed $9,800,000. the Government Anticipates Award Of Three (3) Or More Idiq Contracts; However, The Actual Number Of Awards Shall Be Made At The Discretion Of The Government. submission Requirements: consideration Will Be Limited To Professional A/e Firms Licensed And Registered In Maryland Who Provide A/e Services Primarily In The Disciplines Of Architectural, Civil, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, And Environmental Engineering For Pre-design, Design, And Post-design Of Research Laboratory Facilities. firms Meeting The Above Requirements And Desiring Consideration Must Submit Their Qualifications By No Later Than The Date Specified In This Announcement Via Email To The Following Addresses Using The Email Subject Line “rfq Submission – General Ae Services Idiq Nb195000-25-00009”: Trent.stevens@nist.gov Guzel.gufranova@nist.gov Teresa.harris@nist.gov qualification Submissions Shall Include One (1) Original Electronic Copy In Adobe .pdf Format Of Their Standard Form 330 (sf-330) With Appropriate Data. Ae Firms Shall Include All Subcontractor's Resumes In Part 1 Of The Sf-330. Part 2 Of The Sf-330, General Qualifications, Should Also Be Submitted For Each Subcontractor Or Consultant. Indicate The Solicitation Number On All Documentation Submitted. along With The Sf-330, Offerors Shall Include: a Copy Of Your Current Registration In System For Award Management (sam); proof Of Small Business Status; a Cover Page That Provides: offeror’s Name And Address; offeror’s Uei Number; And, the Name, Title, Email, And Phone Number For The Authorized Representative Of The Offeror. submissions Will Be Evaluated By A Source Selection Evaluation Board (sseb) And Ranked Based On The Stated Evaluation Factors. The Government Will Then Establish A Competitive Range; Firms That Fall Within This Range Will Be Invited To Present Their Capabilities To The Sseb. Formal Solicitations Requesting Fee Proposals Will Be Issued To The Highest Qualified Firms As Determined By The Government. request For Information (rfi) questions And Rfi's Must Be Submitted No Later Than 1:00pm Et On 12/10/2024 Via Email To The Following Addresses Using The Subject Line “rfi - General Ae Services Idiq Nb195000-25-00009” : Trent.stevens@nist.gov Guzel.gufranova@nist.gov. the Contracting Officer Will Post Government Responses To Rfi’s On This Site As An Amendment To This Announcement. Firms Are Responsible For Monitoring This Site For Amendments To The Request For Qualifications. selection Criteria: all Work Performed Shall Be Under The Direct Control And Supervision Of A Professional And Experience Licensed Architect/engineer Employed By The Prime Contractor Assigned As The Responsible Party. part I: Evaluation Of Sf-330 prospective A-e Firms Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Type Of Professional Services Required. The Agency Will Evaluate Each Potential A-e Firm In Terms Of This Announcement. The Selection Criteria Are Listed Below In Descending Order Of Importance: factor 1: Specialized Experience page Limit – 15 Pages firms Who Fail To Meet The Qualifications Of Factor 1 Will Not Be Evaluated On Subsequent Evaluation Factors And Will Not Be Considered For Award. offeror Shall Demonstrate The Specialized Experience And Technical Competence Of Its Firm And Its Proposed Subcontractors Performing A/e Services Meeting The Criteria Of This Solicitation Within The Past Sixty (60) Months By Providing At Least 3 But No More Than 5 Example Projects (sections F, G, And H Of The Sf330) Addressing Each Of The Subfactors Listed Below (1a, 1b, 1c, And 1d). Offeror Shall Provide At Least One Example For Subfactor 1d. All Designs Shall Be Completed At Time Of Request For Qualifications (rfq). For The Purposes Of This Evaluations, “completed” Projects Shall Mean Projects Where Final Work Was Submitted, Approved, And Accepted By The Project Owner. A. The Offeror Shall Describe Design For Renovations With Dates That Include Commercial Window Replacements, Masonry Repairs, And Roofing Repairs. Roofing Designs Are For Replacement Of An Existing Roofing System And Would Include Design And Specifications For New Built-up Roofs (at Least Three Ply) Of At Least 20,000 Sf Minimum, Including Drains, Coping And Flashing. Built Up Roofing Can Either Be Hot Or Cold Applied. B. The Offeror Shall Also Describe With Dates Laboratory Design For Renovations Of At Least 2,000 Sf Which Include Replacement Or New Fume Hood Installation Of A Fume Hood At Least Four Feet In Width, New Laboratory Grade Casework, New Seamless Flooring, And Plumbing That Includes Either Eye Wash Station Or Safety Showers. Laboratories Shall Be For Commercial Facilities, Federal And State Facilities, Hospitals, And College/universities. High School And Lower School Grade Laboratories Will Not Be Considered. C. The Offeror Shall Describe With Dates Designs That Include Laboratory Facility Mechanical, Plumbing, And Electrical Renovations, Upgrades And Alterations That Include Major Utility Systems, Facility Construction And Reconfiguration, Branch Circuits Of At Least 50 Amperes At 208v Or 480v, 3 Phase Power For Installation Of Specialized Scientific Tools, Equipment And Instrumentation (provide Amperage, Phases, And Voltages In Offer). The Contractor Shall Describe Distribution Of Manifold Specialty Gasses Utilizing At Least One Of The Following (nitrogen, Helium, Compressed Air, Or A Custom Blend) Within The Lab (note Which Gas Was In Manifold). D. The Offeror Shall Describe, With Dates, Life Safety And Code Compliance Of The Following: Ibc And Nfpa Analyses, Access And Egress Analyses, Fire Alarm Systems And Device Designs, Nfpa 13 Fire Suppression System Modification Calculations And New Installations, And Hazardous Detection Systems (radiological Or Toxic Gas Monitoring Systems). Note Which Detection System (radiological Or Toxic Gas Monitoring System) Is Being Referenced. factor 2: Professional Qualifications page Limit – 17 Pages the Offeror Shall Demonstrate The Technical Expertise And Professional Qualifications Of Its Proposed Team, Including Subcontractors And Consultants, To Perform The Required A/e Services By Providing Résumés (section E Of The Sf330) For All Of The Following Disciplines: principle senior Architect senior Cost Estimator senior Civil Engineer senior Electrical Engineer senior Fire Protection Engineer senior Geo-technical Engineer senior Laboratory Planner mechanical Engineer (piping) senior Mechanical Engineer (piping) senior Mechanical Engineer (hvac) senior Environmental Engineer senior Scheduler senior Surveyor senior Water Proofing Engineer senior Structural Engineer 2. Senior Positions Of Each Discipline Shall Have A Minimum Of Ten (10) Years Applicable Experience And Shall Be Licensed And/or Certified In Their Applicable Discipline. 3. The Offeror Shall Identify The Roles Of Its Key Personnel By Provide Resumes/sf 330s For Its Proposed Key Personnel That Include Credentials, Education, Registrations, Relevant Experience, And Their Role In Performing Requirements Outlined In Factor 1. 4. The Offeror Shall Submit An Organizational Chart Showing The Interrelations Of The Proposed Team Including All Subcontractors And Consultants. factor 3: Geographical Location page Limit – 1 offeror Shall Be Within 50 Miles Of The Nist Main Campus In Gaithersburg, Md. Nist Address Is 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Md 20899. Offeror Shall Demonstrate This Distance By Submitting Information (driving) Via An Internet Mapping Program. The Driving Shall Begin At The Offeror’s Office To Nist. factor 4: Capacity page Limit – 2 Pages the Offeror Shall Describe Their Team, Including Subcontractors, Capability To Complete Simultaneous Tasks Within The Required Timeframe Based On Current And Planned Workload And Expected Backlog. the Offeror Shall Confirm That There Is Sufficient Capacity Within The Firm, Or That Additional Professional Capacity Can Be Increased As Needed In A Timely Manner To Deliver Projects That Meet The Government’s Specialized Requirements. factor 5: Past Performance page Limit – None offeror Shall Provide Past Performance Information For The Relevant Projects Identified In Their Factor 1 – Specialized Experience Submission In The Form Of Either A Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (cpars) Report Or The Provided Past Performance Questionnaires (ppqs). if The Project Was Completed For The Federal Government, The Offeror Shall Provide A Copy Of The Most Recently Completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (cpars) Report. if No Cpars Is Available, Offeror Shall Use The Provided Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq). Ppqs Shall Be Completed And Signed By The Customer Identified In The Relevant Project. Limit Of One Ppq Per Project. if An Offeror Submits Incomplete Past Performance Or Fails To Submit Any Past Performance Information, The Government May Evaluate Past Performance Based On The Information Obtained Concerning The Offerors’ Performance Relevant To Services Similar In Scope, Complexity, And Size For The Prime Contractor. Additionally, The Following Resources Will Be Used For Evaluation: contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (cpars), Or Similar Systems Of Other Government Departments And Agencies, interviews Within Nist If Offeror Holds/held Previous Contracts, interviews With Program Managers And Contracting Officers, And; other Sources Known To The Government, Including Commercial Sources. in The Case Of An Offeror Without A Cpars Record Of Relevant Past Performance Or For Whom Information On Past Performance Is Not Available, The Offeror Shall Be Rated Neither Favorably Nor Unfavorably. part Ii: Oral Presentations in Accordance With Far 36.602-3, The Government Will Hold Discussions With At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms (firms Within The Competitive Range). More Details Related To The Presentations Will Be Provide To The Firms That Are Selected To Move Forward. fee Proposal only Those Firms Selected For Award Will Be Invited To Provide A Fee Proposal. Firms Shall Submit Along With Their Fee Proposal A Copy Of Audited Overhead Rate Statement Prepared In Accordance With The Federal Acquisition Regulation (far), Part 31 For The Prime And Their Sub-consultants. The Audit Must Be From A Federal, State, Local Government Or An Independent Third-party Auditor In Accordance With Far 31. Audit Conducted In Accordance With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (gaap) Will Not Be Accepted.

Details: 1. Contract Information: This Contract Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks A-e Act As Implemented In Far Subpart 36.6. Firms Will Be Selected For Negotiation Based On Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Required Work. See Numbered Note 24 For General Information On The A-e Selection Process. A-e Services Are Required For Site Investigation, Concept Design, Final Design (option), And Construction Phase Services (option) For The Subject Project. North American Industrial Classification System Code Is 541330, Which Has A Size Standard Of $25,500,000 In Average Annual Receipts. This Announcement Is Open To All Businesses Regardless Of Size. Far Clause “52.219-4 Notice Of Price Evaluation Preference For Hubzone Small Business Concerns” Will Be Included In The Solicitation. A Firm-fixed-price Contract Will Be Negotiated. The Contract Is Anticipated To Be Awarded In Sep 2025 And Design Completed By Oct 2028. A-e Contract Price Is Estimated To Be More Than $10,000,000. If A Large Business Is Selected For This Contract, It Must Comply With Far 52.219 -9 “small Business Subcontracting Plan” Regarding The Requirement For A Subcontracting Plan On That Part Of The Work It Intends To Subcontract. This Action Will Be Subject To Far Clause 52.219-14 “limitations Of Subcontracting.” For The Purposes Of This Solicitation, This Acquisition Is To Be Considered A Service And As Such, The Government Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government For Contract Performance To Subcontractors That Are Not Similarly Situated Entities. Any Work That A Similarly Situated Entity Further Subcontracts Will Count Towards The Prime Contractor's 50% Subcontract Amount That Cannot Be Exceeded. When A Contract Includes Both Services And Supplies, The 50% Limitation Shall Apply Only To The Service Portion Of The Contract; The Subcontracting Goals For The New York District Which Will Be Considered In The Negotiation Of This Contract Are: (1) At Least 25%, But No More Than 49% Of A Contractor's Intended Subcontract Amount Be Placed With Small Businesses (sb); (2) At Least 5 % Of A Contractor's Intended Subcontract Amount Be Placed With Small Disadvantaged Businesses (sdb); (3) At Least 3% Of A Contractor's Intended Subcontract Amount Be Placed With Women-owned Sb (wosb); (4) At Least 3% Of A Contractor's Intended Subcontract Amount Be Placed With Service-disabled Veteran-owned Sb; (5) At Least 3% Of A Contractor's Intended Subcontract Amount Be Placed With Veteran-owned Sb; And (6) At Least 3% Of A Contractor's Intended Subcontract Amount Be Placed With Hubzone Sb. The Plan Is Not Required With This Submittal, But Will Be Required With The Fee Proposal Of The Firm Selected For Negotiations. To Be Eligible For Contract Award, A Firm Must Register For An Unique Entity Id, A 12-character Alphanumeric Id Assigned To An Entity By Sam.gov. New Entities Can Get Their Unique Entity Id At Sam.gov And Complete An Entity Registration. 2. Project Information: Replace, By Deconstruction And Reconstruction, A Multi-story General Instruction Building. Rehabilitate The Original Features Of The Building Constructed In 1911 Which Have Survived. The Primary Facility Will Provide Spaces For General Instruction Classrooms, Lecture Halls And Collaboration Space, Administrative Space With Private And Open Offices, An Auditorium, Lab Space, Conference Rooms, Reception Areas, A Library And Mock Courtroom, An Arms Vault, Showers And Bathrooms, Lactation Rooms, Copy Rooms, Staff Break Rooms, Departmental Storage, Vending Areas And A Cafe, As Well As Freight And Passenger Elevators. Cybersecurity Measures, Electronic Security Systems (pacs & Ids) Installation, Energy Measurement And Control System (emcs) Connection, Building Information Systems, And Fire Alarm And Protection Systems Will Be Included. Supporting Facilities Include Utility Connections (water, Sanitary Sewer, Electrical), Storm Drainage, Walks, Curbs And Gutters, Landscaping, And Site Improvements. Heating Will Be Provided By District Heat, And Air Conditioning Will Be Provided By A Steam Powered Absorptive Chiller System. Comprehensive Building And Furnishings Related Interior Design Services Are Required. This Project Will Be Designed For Accessibility And Usability By Individuals With Disabilities. Utility Connections Are Required To Privatized Electric Distribution, Water, And Wastewater Systems. The Army Intends To Have The Respective Utilities Privatization System Owners, American Water And City Light & Power Make And Own The Necessary Connections Up To The Facility Service Disconnect Or Other Defined Point Of Demarcation. Facilities Will Be Designed To A Minimum Life Of 40 Years In Accordance With Dod's Unified Facilities Criteria (ufc 1-200-02) Including Energy Efficiencies, Building Envelope And Integrated Building Systems Performance. Demolish The Portion Of The Building Constructed In 1955 (321,012 Total Sf). U.s. Military Academy (usma) Has A Substantial Deficit Of -412,799 Square Feet In General Instructional Space, And This Project Will Address A Portion Of That Deficit By Constructing A New Addition. The New Addition, Exterior Alterations, And Related New Construction Will Not Destroy Historic 1911 Materials, Features, And Spatial Relationships That Characterize The Property. The New Work Will Be Differentiated From The Old And Will Be Compatible With The Historic Materials, Features, Size, Scale And Proportion, And Massing To Protect The Integrity Of The Property And Its Environment. The New Addition And Adjacent Or Related New Construction Will Be Undertaken In Such A Manner That, If Removed In The Future, The Essential Form And Integrity Of The Historic 1911 Property And Its Environment Would Be Unimpaired. Moreover, This Project Will Consolidate Key Programs In One Facility. By Upgrading And Consolidating Key Programs Into A Central Location Within The Main Campus, The Academy Aims To Foster A More Cohesive Academic Environment While Addressing Its Instructional Space Deficit. The Centralization Of Programs Will Reduce The Physical Fragmentation Of Departments And Encourage More Cross-disciplinary Collaboration. This Approach Aligns With Modern Educational Trends, Where Academic Institutions Are Moving Towards Flexible, Multi-purpose Spaces That Encourage Interaction And Innovation. Bringing Key Programs Together In Adequately Sized Spaces Will Not Only Optimize The Use Of Space But Also Create An Atmosphere Where Students And Faculty From Different Disciplines Can Engage In Meaningful Collaboration, Enhancing The Learning Experience. This Project Is Required To Update The Flagship Schoolhouse, Thayer Hall, As Part Of The Academic Building Upgrade Program (abup), Which Was Conceived To Address Critical Gaps In Instructional Space And Ensure That Academic Buildings Meet Both The Current And Future Needs Of The Usma's Academic Departments. Thayer Hall Will Support A Student Load Of 2,880 Students. The Project's Primary Goal Is To Reduce The Instructional Space Deficit. By Upgrading The Instructional Facilities, The Academy Seeks To Align Itself With Contemporary Educational Standards, Which Prioritize Collaborative Learning, Cross-disciplinary Interaction, And Active Engagement Between Students And Faculty. The Contract Will Require Accomplishment Of Site Investigation Work. The Contract Will Require Preparation Of Parametric Design Considered To Be 5 – 15 Percent Of The Total Design Effort. The Contract Will Require Preparation Of Concept Design Considered To Be 35 Percent Of The Total Design Effort. As An Option, The Contract Will Require Preparation Of 60%, 90%, And Final 100% Designs. As An Option, The Contract Will Require Delivery Of Construction Phase Ae Services. The Estimated Construction Cost Of This Project Is Over $500,000,000. Cost Estimates Must Be Prepared Using The Corps Of Engineers Micro Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (mcaces) – Second Generation (mii). The Contractor Shall Be Responsible For Accomplishing Designs And Preparing Drawings Using Advanced Modeling And Delivering The Three-dimensional Drawings In Autodesk Revit And Autodesk Civil 3d Software. The Government Will Only Accept The Final Product For Full Operation, Without Conversion Or Reformatting, In The Target Advanced Modeling Software Format, And On The Target Platform Specified Herein. Drawings Shall Be Compliant With The Current A/e/c Cad Standard Available From The Cad/bim Technology Center, Engineer Research And Development Center. 3. Selection Criteria: The Selection Criteria For This Particular Project Are Listed Below In Descending Order Of Importance (first By Major Criterion And Then By Each Sub- Criterion). Criteria A-e Are Primary. Criteria F-g Are Secondary And Will Only Be Used As "tie-breakers" Among Firms That Are Essentially Technically Equal. a. Submit No More Than Ten Projects Which Demonstrate Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In Design Of Facilities Similar To The Project Described Herein. Submitted Projects Should Have A Construction Cost Of At Least $100,000,000. Submitted Projects Should Have A Construction Completion Date No Earlier Than January 2015. On All Example Projects, The Government May Consider The Following Strengths For Evaluation Purposes: (1) Design Of Facility Renovations For Older/historic Institutions Of Higher Learning. (2) Application Of The Secretary Of The Interior’s Standards For The Treatment Of Historic Properties And Compliance With Section 106 Of The National Historic Preservation Act. (3) Sustainable Design Using An Integrated Design Approach And Emphasizing Environmental Stewardship, With Experience In Energy And Water Conservation And Efficiency; Use Of Recovered And Recycled Materials; Waste Reduction; Reduction Or Elimination Of Toxic And Harmful Substances In Facilities Construction And Operation; Efficiency In Resource And Materials Utilization; Development Of Healthy, Safe, And Productive Work Environments; And Employing The Leed Evaluation And Certification Methods. (4) Conducting Whole Building Life Cycle Cost Analysis (wb Lcca) Considering The Cradle-to-grave Costs Associated With Upfront Construction, Lifetime Building Sustainment, Maintenance, Operations (including Energy And Water Use), And Building Disposal, To Target The Most Cost-effective Design To Achieve Modeled Building Energy Consumption Reduction By A Minimum Of 30% Below The Ashrae 90.1 Baseline Specified In 10 Cfr 433 Without The Use Of Fossil Fuel Combustion Systems, With The Goal Being To Select The Optimal Combination Of Interdependent Building Systems (e.g. Envelope, Hvac, Hot Water, Lighting, Wall And Floor Thermal Mass Capacity, Etc). (5) Design Of Resilient Buildings, I.e. A Building That (i) Maximizes The Ability Of The Owner/operator To Withstand And Recover From A Potentially Disruptive Event That May Adversely Affect Mission Assurance And Mission-essential Functions, Including Extreme Weather (as Defined By 10 U.s.c. 101(a)(20)) Or A Disruption To Energy Or Water Supplies; (ii) Has Minimal Energy And Water Demand; (iii) Has An Indoor Environment Optimized To Promote Human Safety, Physical And Psychological Health, And Productivity; And (iv) Integrates Carbon-free Energy Generation And Storage. (6) Design Of Building Stabilization And Structural Shoring And Bracing Systems. (7) Experience Of The Prime Firm And Significant Subconsultants, Particularly The Cost Engineering Firm, The Geotechnical Drilling Firm, And The Asbestos/lead/pcb/hazmat Consulting Firm, In Working Together. b. Qualified Professional Personnel In The Following Key Disciplines: Aabc Certified Commissioning Authority (cxa), Accredited Learning Environment Planner (alep), Architecture, Asbestos/lead/pcb/hazmat Consulting, Certified Value Specialist, Civil Engineering, Clc Or Cld Certified Lighting Consulting, Comptia Certified Cybersecurity Consulting, Construction Project Scheduler Experienced With Primavera P6, Cost Engineering, Cts Certified Audio/visual Consulting, Electrical Engineering, Electronic Security Engineering, Fire Protection Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering, Historic Preservation Architecture, Ince Certified Acoustical Consulting, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Leed Accredited Professional, Mechanical Engineering, Ncidq Or State Licensed Interior Design, Project Management, Structural Engineering, Telecommunications Engineering, And Vertical Transportation Engineering. The Lead Architect Or Engineer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered To Practice In The Appropriate Professional Field. The Civil Engineer, Asbestos/lead/pcb/hazmat Consultant And Land Surveyor Must Be Registered To Practice In New York. The Evaluation Will Consider Education, Certifications, Training, Registration, Overall And Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm. c. Past Performance On Dod And Institution Of Higher Learning Contracts With Respect To Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules, As Determined From Cpars And Other Sources. d. Capacity To Submit The Draft Parametric Design Report (pdr) (10% Complete) By January Or February 2026, To Submit The Corrected Pdr (15% Complete) By April 2026, To Submit The Draft Concept Design (30% Complete) By June Or July 2026, To Submit The Corrected Concept Design (35% Complete) By September 2026, To Submit The 35% Certification Package (consisting Of Final Eng 3086, Designated Construction Agent Assessment Eng 6196, And Cost Schedule Risk Analysis Documentation) By November 2026 And Complete The Final Design (option) By October 2028. Schedule Is Critical For The Project. The Evaluation Will Consider The Experience Of The Firm And Any Consultants In Similar Size Projects, And The Availability Of An Adequate Number Of Personnel In Key Disciplines. e. Knowledge Of Design Of Foundations Bearing On Granite Or Gneiss Bedrock, Design Of Building Systems For Marine, Mixed-humid, And Cold Climate Zones, Rehabilitation Of Historic Stone Masonry, Design Complying With The Department Of Defense (dod) Unified Facilities Criteria, Design Complying With The Department Of The Army Policy Guidance On Resilient Buildings, Or Design Subject To Review By The New York State Historic Preservation Officer Or The New York State Department Of Environmental Conservation. f. Extent Of Participation Of Sb (including Wosb), Sdb, Historically Black Colleges And Universities, And Minority Institutions In The Proposed Contract Team, Measured As A Percentage Of The Total Estimated Effort. g. Volume Of Dod A-e Contract Awards In The Last 12 Months, With The Objective Of Effecting An Equitable Distribution Of Dod A-e Contracts Among Qualified Firms, Including Sb And Sdb. 4. Submission Requirements: Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit Sf 330 Part I And Sf 330 Part Ii For The Prime Firm And All Consultants, To Jordan.k.moran@usace.army.mil Not Later Than 11:59 Pm Est On The Response Date Indicated Above. The Sf 330 Part I Shall Not Exceed 100 Pages (pdf Formatted To 8.5” X 11” Page Size), Including No More Than 50 Pages For Section E. Use No Smaller Than 12 Font Type. The Firm Is Encouraged, But Not Required, To Include Their Sam.gov-assigned Unique Entity Id Number In Sf 330, Part I, Section H. In Section H Describe The Firm's Overall Design Quality Management Plan (dqmp). A Project-specific Design Quality Control Plan Must Be Prepared And Approved By The Government As A Condition Of Contract Award But Is Not Required With This Submission. In Section H Also Indicate The Estimated Percentage Involvement Of Each Firm On The Proposed Team. The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Be Interviewed. Neither Facsimile Nor Paper Hardcopy Transmissions Will Be Accepted. Solicitation Packages Are Not Provided, And No Additional Project Information Will Be Given To Firms During The Announcement Period. This Is Not A Request For Proposal. The Government Intends To Notify Interested Firms Of The Selection Or Non-selection Decision By March 2025. point Of Contact: Jordan Moran, (917) 908-8121 email Your Questions To Us Army Corps Of Engineers New York District At Jordan.k.moran@usace.army.mil

Details: Description Republic Of The Philippines Department Of Justice Bureau Of Corrections Muntinlupa City Philippine Bidding Documents Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) (procurement/contract No. 009) Sixth Edition July 2020 Bids And Awards Committee 202 Table Of Contents Section I. Invitation To Bid 3 Section Ii. Instructions To Bidders 6 Section Iii. Bid Data Sheet 13 Section Iv. General Conditions Of Contract 19 Section V. Special Conditions Of Contract 24 Section Vi. Specifications 26 Section Vii. Drawings 59 Section Viii. Bill Of Quantities 60 Section Ix. Checklist Of Technical And Financial Documents 61 Section I. Invitation To Bid Republic Of The Philippines Department Of Justice Bureau Of Corrections Muntinlupa City Invitation To Bid Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) 1. The Bureau Of Corrections, Through The National Expenditure Program (nep) Of 2025 Capital Outlay, Intends To Apply The Sum Of Three Hundred Million Pesos Only (₱300,000,000.00) Being The Approved Budget For The Contract (abc) To Payments Under The Contract For The Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) With Identification Number _epa-009__. Bids Received In Excess Of The Abc Shall Be Automatically Rejected At Bid Opening. 2. The Bureau Of Corrections Now Invites Bids For Provision Of A Detailed Preliminary Architectural And Engineering Design, Detailed Engineering Requirements And Actual Construction Of The Bureau Of Corrections Super Maximum Security Facility, Based On The Final Detailed Architectural And Engineering Design, To Be Approved By The Head Of Procuring Entity Or Its Duly Authorized Representative Conformably With The Minimum Standards Set Forth In The (1) Presidential Decree (pd) No. 1096, National Building Code Of The Philippines (2) Batas Pambansa (bp)blg. 344, An Act To Enhance The Mobility Of Disabled Persons By Requiring Certain Public Buildings, Institutions, Establishments And Public Utilities To Install Facilities And Other Devices (3) National Structural Code Of The Philippines (nscp), Volume I, 2010 (4) Philippine Electrical Code (pec), 2009 (5) Revised Plumbing Code Of The Philippines (6) Revised Irr Of Ra 10575 (7) Republic Act (ra) No. 9514, Revised Fire Code Of The Philippines And (8) Applicable Local Regulations And Ordinances. Completion Of The Works Is Required Within Three Hundred Sixty-five (365) Calendar Days. Bidders Should Have Completed A Contract Similar To The Project Amounting To At Least Fifty Percent (50%) Of The Abc Within The Last Six (6) Years. The Description Of An Eligible Bidder Is Contained In The Bidding Documents, Particularly, In Section Ii. Instructions To Bidders. 3. Bidding Will Be Conducted Through Open Competitive Bidding Procedures Using Non-discretionary “pass/fail” Criterion As Specified In The 2016 Revised Implementing Rules And Regulations (irr) Of Republic Act 9184 (ra 9184), Otherwise Known As The “government Procurement Reform Act.” Bidding Is Restricted To Filipino Citizens/sole Proprietorships, Cooperatives, And Partnerships Or Organizations With At Least Seventy-five Percent (75%) Interest Or Outstanding Capital Stock Belonging To Citizens Of The Philippines. 4. Interested Bidders May Obtain Further Information From Bureau Of Corrections And Inspect The Bidding Documents At The Address Given Below From Monday To Friday From 8:00am To 5:00pm. 5. A Complete Set Of Bidding Documents May Be Acquired By Interested Bidders On _december 28, 2024 (08:00am To 05:00pm) To January 20, 2025 (01:29 Pm)_____ From The Given Address And Website(s) Below. It May Also Be Downloaded Free Of Charge From The Website Of The Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (philgeps) And The Website Of The Procuring Entity Bucor.gov.ph, Provided That Bidders Shall Pay The Applicable Fee Of Fifty Thousand (₱50,000.00) Pesos Only For The Bidding Documents Not Later Than The Submission Of Their Bids. The Procuring Entity Shall Allow The Bidder To Present Its Proof Of Payment For The Fees In Person Or By Facsimile. 6. The Bureau Of Corrections Will Hold A Pre-bid Conference On _january 06, 2025 (01:30pm)__ At Bac Conference Room Nbp Reservation Muntinlupa City, Which Shall Be Open To Prospective Bidders. 7. Bids Must Be Duly Received By The Bac Secretariat Through Manual Submission At The Office Address As Indicated Below, On Or Before __january 20, 2025 (01:30pm)_____. Late Bids Shall Not Be Accepted. 8. All Bids Must Be Accompanied By A Bid Security In Any Of The Acceptable Forms And In The Amount Stated In Itb Clause 15. 9. Bid Opening Shall Be On __january 20, 2025 (01:30pm)____ At The Bac Conference Room Nbp Reservation Muntinlupa City. Bids Will Be Opened In The Presence Of The Bidders’ Representatives Who Choose To Attend The Activity. 10. The Bureau Of Corrections Reserves The Right To Reject Any And All Bids, Declare A Failure Of Bidding, Or Not Award The Contract At Any Time Prior To Contract Award In Accordance With Sections 35.6 And 41 Of The 2016 Revised Implementing Rules And Regulations (irr) Of Ra No. 9184, Without Thereby Incurring Any Liability To The Affected Bidder Or Bidders. 11. For Further Information, Please Refer To: Ma. Adoracion I. Viñas Office Of The Bac Secretariat Supply Office, Bureau Of Corrections, Muntinlupa City Tel # 02-8809-8587/02-8478-0907 Bacsec2022@gmail.com 12. You May Visit The Following Websites: For Downloading Of Bidding Documents: Bucor.gov.ph Date Of Issue: _______________ Ccsupt Celso S Bravo Chairperson, Bids And Awards Committee Section Ii. Instructions To Bidders 1. Scope Of Bid The Procuring Entity, Bureau Of Corrections Invites Bids For The Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf), With Project Identification Number__________________. [note: The Project Identification Number Is Assigned By The Procuring Entity Based On Its Own Coding Scheme And Is Not The Same As The Philgeps Reference Number, Which Is Generated After The Posting Of The Bid Opportunity On The Philgeps Website.] The Procurement Project Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) Is For The Construction Of Works, As Described In Section Vi (specifications). 2. Funding Information 2.1. The Gop Through The Source Of Funding As Indicated Below For 2025 In The Amount Of Three Hundred Million Pesos Only (₱300,000,000.00). 2.2. The Source Of Funding Is: Nga, The National Expenditure Program 3. Bidding Requirements The Bidding For The Project Shall Be Governed By All The Provisions Of Ra No. 9184 And Its 2016 Revised Irr, Including Its Generic Procurement Manual And Associated Policies, Rules And Regulations As The Primary Source Thereof, While The Herein Clauses Shall Serve As The Secondary Source Thereof. Any Amendments Made To The Irr And Other Gppb Issuances Shall Be Applicable Only To The Ongoing Posting, Advertisement, Or Invitation To Bid By The Bac Through The Issuance Of A Supplemental Or Bid Bulletin. The Bidder, By The Act Of Submitting Its Bid, Shall Be Deemed To Have Inspected The Site, Determined The General Characteristics Of The Contracted Works And The Conditions For This Project, Such As The Location And The Nature Of The Work; (b) Climatic Conditions; (c) Transportation Facilities; (c) Nature And Condition Of The Terrain, Geological Conditions At The Site Communication Facilities, Requirements, Location And Availability Of Construction Aggregates And Other Materials, Labor, Water, Electric Power And Access Roads; And (d) Other Factors That May Affect The Cost, Duration And Execution Or Implementation Of The Contract, Project, Or Work And Examine All Instructions, Forms, Terms, And Project Requirements In The Bidding Documents. 4. Corrupt, Fraudulent, Collusive, Coercive, And Obstructive Practices The Procuring Entity, As Well As The Bidders And Contractors, Shall Observe The Highest Standard Of Ethics During The Procurement And Execution Of The Contract. They Or Through An Agent Shall Not Engage In Corrupt, Fraudulent, Collusive, Coercive, And Obstructive Practices Defined Under Annex “i” Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184 Or Other Integrity Violations In Competing For The Project. 5. Eligible Bidders 5.1. Only Bids Of Bidders Found To Be Legally, Technically, And Financially Capable Will Be Evaluated. 5.2. The Bidder Must Have An Experience Of Having Completed A Single Largest Completed Contract (slcc) That Is Similar To This Project, Equivalent To At Least Fifty Percent (50%) Of The Abc Adjusted, If Necessary, By The Bidder To Current Prices Using The Psa’s Cpi, Except Under Conditions Provided For In Section 23.4.2.4 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184. A Contract Is Considered To Be “similar” To The Contract To Be Bid If It Has The Major Categories Of Work Stated In The Bds. 5.3. For Foreign-funded Procurement, The Procuring Entity And The Foreign Government/foreign Or International Financing Institution May Agree On Another Track Record Requirement, As Specified In The Bidding Document Prepared For This Purpose. 5.4. The Bidders Shall Comply With The Eligibility Criteria Under Section 23.4.2 Of The 2016 Irr Of Ra No. 9184. 6. Origin Of Associated Goods There Is No Restriction On The Origin Of Goods Other Than Those Prohibited By A Decision Of The Un Security Council Taken Under Chapter Vii Of The Charter Of The Un. 7. Subcontracts 7.1. The Bidder May Subcontract Portions Of The Project To The Extent Allowed By The Procuring Entity As Stated Herein, But In No Case More Than Fifty Percent (50%) Of The Project. The Procuring Entity Has Prescribed That: A. Subcontracting Is Not Allowed. 7.1. [if Procuring Entity Has Determined That Subcontracting Is Allowed During The Bidding, State:] The Bidder Must Submit Together With Its Bid The Documentary Requirements Of The Subcontractor(s) Complying With The Eligibility Criteria Stated In Itb Clause 5 In Accordance With Section 23.4 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184 Pursuant To Section 23.1 Thereof. 7.2. [if Subcontracting Is Allowed During The Contract Implementation Stage, State:] The Supplier May Identify Its Subcontractor During The Contract Implementation Stage. Subcontractors Identified During The Bidding May Be Changed During The Implementation Of This Contract. Subcontractors Must Submit The Documentary Requirements Under Section 23.1 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184 And Comply With The Eligibility Criteria Specified In Itb Clause 5 To The Implementing Or End-user Unit. 7.3. Subcontracting Of Any Portion Of The Project Does Not Relieve The Contractor Of Any Liability Or Obligation Under The Contract. The Supplier Will Be Responsible For The Acts, Defaults, And Negligence Of Any Subcontractor, Its Agents, Servants, Or Workmen As Fully As If These Were The Contractor’s Own Acts, Defaults, Or Negligence, Or Those Of Its Agents, Servants, Or Workmen. 8. Pre-bid Conference The Procuring Entity Will Hold A Pre-bid Conference For This Project On The Specified Date And Time And Either At Its Physical Address At Bac Conference Room Nbp Reservation Muntinlupa City And/or Through Videoconferencing/webcasting} As Indicated In Paragraph 6 Of The Ib. 9. Clarification And Amendment Of Bidding Documents Prospective Bidders May Request For Clarification On And/or Interpretation Of Any Part Of The Bidding Documents. Such Requests Must Be In Writing And Received By The Procuring Entity, Either At Its Given Address Or Through Electronic Mail Indicated In The Ib, At Least Ten (10) Calendar Days Before The Deadline Set For The Submission And Receipt Of Bids. 10. Documents Comprising The Bid: Eligibility And Technical Components 10.1. The First Envelope Shall Contain The Eligibility And Technical Documents Of The Bid As Specified In Section Ix. Checklist Of Technical And Financial Documents. 10.2. If The Eligibility Requirements Or Statements, The Bids, And All Other Documents For Submission To The Bac Are In Foreign Language Other Than English, It Must Be Accompanied By A Translation In English, Which Shall Be Authenticated By The Appropriate Philippine Foreign Service Establishment, Post, Or The Equivalent Office Having Jurisdiction Over The Foreign Bidder’s Affairs In The Philippines. For Contracting Parties To The Apostille Convention, Only The Translated Documents Shall Be Authenticated Through An Apostille Pursuant To Gppb Resolution No. 13-2019 Dated 23 May 2019. The English Translation Shall Govern, For Purposes Of Interpretation Of The Bid. 10.3. A Valid Pcab License Is Required, And In Case Of Joint Ventures, A Valid Special Pcab License, And Registration For The Type And Cost Of The Contract For This Project. Any Additional Type Of Contractor License Or Permit Shall Be Indicated In The Bds. 10.4. A List Of Contractor’s Key Personnel (e.g., Project Manager, Project Engineers, Materials Engineers, And Foremen) Assigned To The Contract To Be Bid, With Their Complete Qualification And Experience Data Shall Be Provided. These Key Personnel Must Meet The Required Minimum Years Of Experience Set In The Bds. 10.5. A List Of Contractor’s Major Equipment Units, Which Are Owned, Leased, And/or Under Purchase Agreements, Supported By Proof Of Ownership, Certification Of Availability Of Equipment From The Equipment Lessor/vendor For The Duration Of The Project, As The Case May Be, Must Meet The Minimum Requirements For The Contract Set In The Bds. 11. Documents Comprising The Bid: Financial Component 11.1. The Second Bid Envelope Shall Contain The Financial Documents For The Bid As Specified In Section Ix. Checklist Of Technical And Financial Documents. 11.2. Any Bid Exceeding The Abc Indicated In Paragraph 1 Of The Ib Shall Not Be Accepted. 11.3. For Foreign-funded Procurement, A Ceiling May Be Applied To Bid Prices Provided The Conditions Are Met Under Section 31.2 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184. 12. Alternative Bids Bidders Shall Submit Offers That Comply With The Requirements Of The Bidding Documents, Including The Basic Technical Design As Indicated In The Drawings And Specifications. Unless There Is A Value Engineering Clause In The Bds, Alternative Bids Shall Not Be Accepted. 13. Bid Prices All Bid Prices For The Given Scope Of Work In The Project As Awarded Shall Be Considered As Fixed Prices, And Therefore Not Subject To Price Escalation During Contract Implementation, Except Under Extraordinary Circumstances As Determined By The Neda And Approved By The Gppb Pursuant To The Revised Guidelines For Contract Price Escalation Guidelines. 14. Bid And Payment Currencies 14.1. Bid Prices May Be Quoted In The Local Currency Or Tradable Currency Accepted By The Bsp At The Discretion Of The Bidder. However, For Purposes Of Bid Evaluation, Bids Denominated In Foreign Currencies Shall Be Converted To Philippine Currency Based On The Exchange Rate As Published In The Bsp Reference Rate Bulletin On The Day Of The Bid Opening. 14.2. Payment Of The Contract Price Shall Be Made In: A. Philippine Pesos. 15. Bid Security 15.1. The Bidder Shall Submit A Bid Securing Declaration Or Any Form Of Bid Security In The Amount Indicated In The Bds, Which Shall Be Not Less Than The Percentage Of The Abc In Accordance With The Schedule In The Bds. 15.2. The Bid And Bid Security Shall Be Valid Until One Hundred Twenty (120) Calendar Days. Any Bid Not Accompanied By An Acceptable Bid Security Shall Be Rejected By The Procuring Entity As Non-responsive. 16. Sealing And Marking Of Bids Each Bidder Shall Submit One Copy Of The First And Second Components Of Its Bid. The Procuring Entity May Request Additional Hard Copies And/or Electronic Copies Of The Bid. However, Failure Of The Bidders To Comply With The Said Request Shall Not Be A Ground For Disqualification. If The Procuring Entity Allows The Submission Of Bids Through Online Submission To The Given Website Or Any Other Electronic Means, The Bidder Shall Submit An Electronic Copy Of Its Bid, Which Must Be Digitally Signed. An Electronic Copy That Cannot Be Opened Or Is Corrupted Shall Be Considered Non-responsive And, Thus, Automatically Disqualified. 17. Deadline For Submission Of Bids The Bidders Shall Submit On The Specified Date And Time And Either At Its Physical Address Or Through Online Submission As Indicated In Paragraph 7 Of The Ib. 18. Opening And Preliminary Examination Of Bids 18.1. The Bac Shall Open The Bids In Public At The Time, On The Date, And At The Place Specified In Paragraph 9 Of The Ib. The Bidders’ Representatives Who Are Present Shall Sign A Register Evidencing Their Attendance. In Case Videoconferencing, Webcasting Or Other Similar Technologies Will Be Used, Attendance Of Participants Shall Likewise Be Recorded By The Bac Secretariat. In Case The Bids Cannot Be Opened As Scheduled Due To Justifiable Reasons, The Rescheduling Requirements Under Section 29 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184 Shall Prevail. 18.2. The Preliminary Examination Of Bids Shall Be Governed By Section 30 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184. 19. Detailed Evaluation And Comparison Of Bids 19.1. The Procuring Entity’s Bac Shall Immediately Conduct A Detailed Evaluation Of All Bids Rated “passed” Using Non-discretionary Pass/fail Criteria. The Bac Shall Consider The Conditions In The Evaluation Of Bids Under Section 32.2 Of 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184. 19.2. If The Project Allows Partial Bids, All Bids And Combinations Of Bids As Indicated In The Bds Shall Be Received By The Same Deadline And Opened And Evaluated Simultaneously So As To Determine The Bid Or Combination Of Bids Offering The Lowest Calculated Cost To The Procuring Entity. Bid Security As Required By Itb Clause 16 Shall Be Submitted For Each Contract (lot) Separately. 19.3. In All Cases, The Nfcc Computation Pursuant To Section 23.4.2.6 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184 Must Be Sufficient For The Total Of The Abcs For All The Lots Participated In By The Prospective Bidder. 20. Post Qualification Within A Non-extendible Period Of Five (5) Calendar Days From Receipt By The Bidder Of The Notice From The Bac That It Submitted The Lowest Calculated Bid, The Bidder Shall Submit Its Latest Income And Business Tax Returns Filed And Paid Through The Bir Electronic Filing And Payment System (efps), And Other Appropriate Licenses And Permits Required By Law And Stated In The Bds. 21. Signing Of The Contract The Documents Required In Section 37.2 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184 Shall Form Part Of The Contract. Additional Contract Documents Are Indicated In The Bds. Section Iii. Bid Data Sheet Bid Data Sheet Itb Clause 5.2 For This Purpose, Contracts Similar To The Project Refer To Contracts Which Have The Same Major Categories Of Work, Which Shall Be: Architectural, Engineering Design, Detailed Engineering Requirements And Construction Of Building With Concreting Works. 7.1 Subcontracting Is Not Allowed 10.3 A Valid Pcab License Is Required, And In Case Of Joint Ventures, A Valid Special Pcab License, And Registration For The Type And Cost Of The Contract For This Project. 10.4 The Key Personnel Must Meet The Required Minimum Years Of Experience Set Below: For Design Personnel: Key Personnel General Experience Relevant Experience Principal Architect The Principal Architect Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Ten (10) Years’ Experience Experience In The Design Of Residential, Government Offices Or Institutional Facilities, And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. Structural Engineer The Structural Engineer Must Be A Duly-licensed Civil Engineer With At Least Ten (10) Years’ Experience. Experience In Structural Design And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. Professional Electrical Engineer The Electrical Engineer Must Be A Registered Professional Electrical Engineer With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In The Design Of Lighting, Power Distribution, Communication Systems (specifically Structured And Local Area Network Cabling, Pabx), Building Management Systems And Preferably Knowledgeable In Developments In Emergent Efficient Lighting Technologies And Energy Management. Professional Mechanical Engineer The Mechanical Engineer Must Be A Professional Mechanical Engineer With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In Hvac And Fire Protection Systems And Preferably Knowledgeable In Emergent, Alternative Energy- Efficient Hvac Technologies. Electronics And Communications Engineer The Electronics And Communications Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In The Design Of Communications Systems, And Preferably Knowledgeable In The Application Of Building Automation And Surveillance Systems. Sanitary Engineer The Sanitary Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In The Design Of Building Water Supply And Distribution, Plumbing, And Preferably Knowledgeable In Waste Water Management/treatment, And Emergent, Alternative Effluent Collection And Treatment System. The Design & Build Contractor May, As Needed And At Its Own Expense, Add Additional Professionals And/or Support Personnel For The Optimal Performance Of All Architectural And Engineering Design Services, As Stipulated In These Terms Of Reference, For The Project. Prospective Bidders Shall Attach Each Individual’s Resume And Prc License Of The (professional) Staff. Design Personnel May Also Be Utilized For The Construction Phase Provided That The Same Meet The Minimum Number Of Years Of Experience In The Construction Of Similar Projects. For Construction Personnel: Key Personnel General Experience Relevant Experience Project Manager The Project Manager Shall Be A Licensed Architect Or Engineer With At Least Eight (8) Years Relevant Experience. Relevant Experience On Similar And Comparable Projects In Different Locations. The Project Manager Should Have A Proven Record Or Managerial Capability Through The Directing/managing Of Major Civil Engineering Works, Including Projects Of A Similar Magnitude. Project Architect/engineer The Project Architect/engineer Shall Be A Licensed Architect Or Engineer With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. Materials Engineer (m.e. I) The Materials Engineer Must Be Duly Accredited With The Dpwh And With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. Electrical Engineer The Electrical Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects In The Installation Of Lighting, Power Distribution, Communication Systems (specifically Structured And Local Area Network Cabling, Pabx), Building Management Systems. Mechanical Engineer The Mechanical Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects In The Installation Of Hvac And Fire Protection. Sanitary Engineer The Sanitary Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects In The Installation Of Building Water Supply And Distribution, Plumbing. Foreman The Foreman Must Have At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience. Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. Safety Officer The Sanitary Officer Must Have At Least Two (2) Years’ Experience. Must Be An Accredited Safety Practitioner By The Department Of Labor And Employment (dole) And Must Have Undergone The Prescribed Forty (40) Hour Construction Safety And Health Training (cosh) 10.5 The Minimum Major Equipment Requirements Are The Following: Equipment Capacity Number Of Units Backhoe At Least 38hp With 0.055 To 0.160 M3 Bucket Capacity 1 Pay Loader At Least 2.5 To 9.5 M3 Bucket Capacity 1 Dump Truck At Least 10 Cu.m. 2 Generator 50kva 1 Concrete Mixers 1 Bagger 4 Welding Machines 300amp Heavy Duty 4 Submersible Dredging Pump At Least 1hp And 2” Output 1 Prospective Bidders Shall Attach The List Of Contractor’s Major Equipment Units, Which Are Owned, Leased, And/or Under Purchase Agreements, Supported By Proof Of Ownership, Certification Of Availability Of Equipment From The Equipment Lessor/vendor For The Duration Of The Project, As The Case May Be. 12 No Further Instructions. 15.1 The Bid Security Shall Be In The Form Of A Bid Securing Declaration Or Any Of The Following Forms And Amounts: A. The Amount Of Not Less Than 2% Of The Abc, If Bid Security Is In Cash, Cashier’s/manager’s Check, Bank Draft/guarantee Or Irrevocable Letter Of Credit; B. The Amount Of Not Less Than 5% Of The Abc, If Bid Security Is In Surety Bond. 19.2 No Further Instructions. 20 Within A Non-extendible Period Of Five (5) Calendar Days From Receipt By The Bidder Of The Notice From The Bac That It Submitted The Lowest Calculated Bid, The Bidder Shall Submit Its; 1. Latest Income And Business Tax Returns Filed And Paid Through The Bir Electronic Filing And Payment System (efps) 2. Supporting Documents For The Slcc (notice Of Award And/or Notice To Proceed And Project Owner’s Certificate Of Final Acceptance Issued By The Owner Other Than The Contractor Or The Constructors Performance Evaluation System (cpes) Final Rating, Which Must Be At Least Satisfactory. In Case Of Contracts With The Private Sector, An Equivalent Document Shall Be Submitted) 3. Certified True Copy Coming From The Issuing Agency Of Valid And Current Registration Certificate (sec Certificate Of Registration For Corporation Or Dti Certificate Of Registration For Sole Proprietorship Or Cda Certificate Of Registration For Cooperative) 4. Valid And Current Mayor’s Or Business Permit 5. Valid And Current Tax Clearance 6. Valid And Current Pcab License And Registration 7. Audited Financial Statement 8. Three (3) Sets Photocopy Of Eligibility And Financial Envelope Duly Marked As “copy No.1”, “copy No.2” And “copy No.3” 21 No Further Instructions. Section Iv. General Conditions Of Contract 1. Scope Of Contract This Contract Shall Include All Such Items, Although Not Specifically Mentioned, That Can Be Reasonably Inferred As Being Required For Its Completion As If Such Items Were Expressly Mentioned Herein. All The Provisions Of Ra No. 9184 And Its 2016 Revised Irr, Including The Generic Procurement Manual, And Associated Issuances, Constitute The Primary Source For The Terms And Conditions Of The Contract, And Thus, Applicable In Contract Implementation. Herein Clauses Shall Serve As The Secondary Source For The Terms And Conditions Of The Contract. This Is Without Prejudice To Sections 74.1 And 74.2 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184 Allowing The Gppb To Amend The Irr, Which Shall Be Applied To All Procurement Activities, The Advertisement, Posting, Or Invitation Of Which Were Issued After The Effectivity Of The Said Amendment. 2. Sectional Completion Of Works If Sectional Completion Is Specified In The Special Conditions Of Contract (scc), References In The Conditions Of Contract To The Works, The Completion Date, And The Intended Completion Date Shall Apply To Any Section Of The Works (other Than References To The Completion Date And Intended Completion Date For The Whole Of The Works). 3. Possession Of Site 3.1 The Procuring Entity Shall Give Possession Of All Or Parts Of The Site To The Contractor Based On The Schedule Of Delivery Indicated In The Scc, Which Corresponds To The Execution Of The Works. If The Contractor Suffers Delay Or Incurs Cost From Failure On The Part Of The Procuring Entity To Give Possession In Accordance With The Terms Of This Clause, The Procuring Entity’s Representative Shall Give The Contractor A Contract Time Extension And Certify Such Sum As Fair To Cover The Cost Incurred, Which Sum Shall Be Paid By Procuring Entity. 3.2 If Possession Of A Portion Is Not Given By The Above Date, The Procuring Entity Will Be Deemed To Have Delayed The Start Of The Relevant Activities. The Resulting Adjustments In Contract Time To Address Such Delay May Be Addressed Through Contract Extension Provided Under Annex “e” Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184. 4. The Contractor’s Obligations The Contractor Shall Employ The Key Personnel Named In The Schedule Of Key Personnel Indicating Their Designation, In Accordance With Itb Clause 10.3 And Specified In The Bds, To Carry Out The Supervision Of The Works. The Procuring Entity Will Approve Any Proposed Replacement Of Key Personnel Only If Their Relevant Qualifications And Abilities Are Equal To Or Better Than Those Of The Personnel Listed In The Schedule. 5. Performance Security 5.1. Within Ten (10) Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Notice Of Award From The Procuring Entity But In No Case Later Than The Signing Of The Contract By Both Parties, The Successful Bidder Shall Furnish The Performance Security In Any Of The Forms Prescribed In Section 39 Of The 2016 Revised Irr. 5.2. The Contractor, By Entering Into The Contract With The Procuring Entity, Acknowledges The Right Of The Procuring Entity To Institute Action Pursuant To Ra No. 3688 Against Any Subcontractor Be They An Individual, Firm, Partnership, Corporation, Or Association Supplying The Contractor With Labor, Materials And/or Equipment For The Performance Of This Contract. 6. Site Investigation Reports The Contractor, In Preparing The Bid, Shall Rely On Any Site Investigation Reports Referred To In The Scc Supplemented By Any Information Obtained By The Contractor. 7. Warranty 7.1. In Case The Contractor Fails To Undertake The Repair Works Under Section 62.2.2 Of The 2016 Revised Irr, The Procuring Entity Shall Forfeit Its Performance Security, Subject Its Property (ies) To Attachment Or Garnishment Proceedings, And Perpetually Disqualify It From Participating In Any Public Bidding. All Payables Of The Gop In His Favor Shall Be Offset To Recover The Costs. 7.2. The Warranty Against Structural Defects/failures, Except That Occasioned-on Force Majeure, Shall Cover The Period From The Date Of Issuance Of The Certificate Of Final Acceptance By The Procuring Entity. Specific Duration Of The Warranty Is Found In The Scc. 8. Liability Of The Contractor Subject To Additional Provisions, If Any, Set Forth In The Scc, The Contractor’s Liability Under This Contract Shall Be As Provided By The Laws Of The Republic Of The Philippines. If The Contractor Is A Joint Venture, All Partners To The Joint Venture Shall Be Jointly And Severally Liable To The Procuring Entity. 9. Termination For Other Causes Contract Termination Shall Be Initiated In Case It Is Determined Prima Facie By The Procuring Entity That The Contractor Has Engaged, Before, Or During The Implementation Of The Contract, In Unlawful Deeds And Behaviors Relative To Contract Acquisition And Implementation, Such As, But Not Limited To Corrupt, Fraudulent, Collusive, Coercive, And Obstructive Practices As Stated In Itb Clause 4. 10. Dayworks Subject To The Guidelines On Variation Order In Annex “e” Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184, And If Applicable As Indicated In The Scc, The Dayworks Rates In The Contractor’s Bid Shall Be Used For Small Additional Amounts Of Work Only When The Procuring Entity’s Representative Has Given Written Instructions In Advance For Additional Work To Be Paid For In That Way. 11. Program Of Work 11.1. The Contractor Shall Submit To The Procuring Entity’s Representative For Approval The Said Program Of Work Showing The General Methods, Arrangements, Order, And Timing For All The Activities In The Works. The Submissions Of The Program Of Work Are Indicated In The Scc. 11.2. The Contractor Shall Submit To The Procuring Entity’s Representative For Approval An Updated Program Of Work At Intervals No Longer Than The Period Stated In The Scc. If The Contractor Does Not Submit An Updated Program Of Work Within This Period, The Procuring Entity’s Representative May Withhold The Amount Stated In The Scc From The Next Payment Certificate And Continue To Withhold This Amount Until The Next Payment After The Date On Which The Overdue Program Of Work Has Been Submitted. 12. Instructions, Inspections And Audits The Contractor Shall Permit The Gop Or The Procuring Entity To Inspect The Contractor’s Accounts And Records Relating To The Performance Of The Contractor And To Have Them Audited By Auditors Of The Gop Or The Procuring Entity, As May Be Required. 13. Advance Payment The Procuring Entity Shall, Upon A Written Request Of The Contractor Which Shall Be Submitted As A Contract Document, Make An Advance Payment To The Contractor In An Amount Not Exceeding Fifteen Percent (15%) Of The Total Contract Price, To Be Made In Lump Sum, Or At The Most Two Installments According To A Schedule Specified In The Scc, Subject To The Requirements In Annex “e” Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra No. 9184. 14. Progress Payments The Contractor May Submit A Request For Payment For Work Accomplished. Such Requests For Payment Shall Be Verified And Certified By The Procuring Entity’s Representative/project Engineer. Except As Otherwise Stipulated In The Scc, Materials And Equipment Delivered On The Site But Not Completely Put In Place Shall Not Be Included For Payment. 15. Operating And Maintenance Manuals 15.1. If Required, The Contractor Will Provide “as Built” Drawings And/or Operating And Maintenance Manuals As Specified In The Scc. 15.2. If The Contractor Does Not Provide The Drawings And/or Manuals By The Dates Stated Above, Or They Do Not Receive The Procuring Entity’s Representative’s Approval, The Procuring Entity’s Representative May Withhold The Amount Stated In The Scc From Payments Due To The Contractor. Section V. Special Conditions Of Contract Special Conditions Of Contract Gcc Clause 2 Sectional Completion Is Not Applicable The Intended Completion Date Is Three Hundred Sixty-five (365) Calendar Days From The Date Of Receipt Of The Ntp. 4.1 The Procuring Entity Shall Give Possession Of All Parts Of The Site To The Contractor From The Date Of The Receipt Of Notice To Proceed (ntp). 6 No Further Instructions. 7.2 Fifteen (15) Years. 10 No Dayworks Are Applicable To The Contract. 11.1 The Contractor Shall Submit The Program Of Work To The Procuring Entity’s Representative Within Fourteen (14) Calendar Days After The Issuance Of The Notice To Proceed (ntp) 11.2 The Amount To Be Withheld For Late Submission Of An Updated Program Of Work Is One Tenth Of One Percent Of The Total Contract Price. 13 The Amount Of The Advance Payment Is Fifteen Percent (15%) Of The Contract Price Upon Submission To And Acceptance By The Bureau Of Corrections Of An Irrevocable Standby Letter Of Credit Of Equivalent Value From A Commercial Bank, A Bank Guarantee Or A Surety Bond Callable Upon Demand Issued By A Surety Or Insurance Company Duly Licensed By The Insurance Commission And Confirmed By The Bureau Of Corrections. 14 The Contractor May Submit A Request For Payment For Work Accomplished. Such Requests For Payment Shall Be Verified And Certified By The Procuring Entity’s Representative/project Engineer. Materials And Equipment Delivered On The Site But Not Completely Put In Place Shall Not Be Included For Payment. 15.1 The Date By Which “as Built” Drawings Are Required Is Upon Actual Completion Of The Project. 15.2 The Amount To Be Withheld For Failing To Produce “as Built” Drawings And/or Operating And Maintenance Manuals By The Date Required Is Equivalent To Five Percent (5%) Of The Contract Price. Section Vi. Specifications Terms Of Reference Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm, Occidental Mindoro 1. Project Information 1.1 Project Description The Mission Of The Bucor Is To Protect Society By Confining Offenders In The Controlled Environments Of Prisons And Community-based Facilities That Are Safe, Humane, Cost-efficient, And Appropriately Secure, And That Provide Self-improvement Opportunities To Assist Offenders In Becoming Law-abiding Citizens. The Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) Shall Be Conducive To The Reformation And Rehabilitation Of Inmates That Will Bring Them Back Into The Mainstream Of Society As Useful Citizens Of The Country. The Contract Will Involve The Design And Build Scheme Leading To The Construction Of The Bureau Of Corrections Super Maximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm, Sablayan, Occidental Mindoro. The Plans And Designs Shall Be In Accordance With The Plan Of The Said Structures As Conceptualized By The Bucor Planning And Design Division Or As Conceptualized By The Winning Bidder If The Latter Is Found To Be Superior (as Defined In Section 3.1.1 Of This Tor). Contractors Shall Be Required To Conduct A Bucor Led Site Inspection And Evaluation To Enable The Contractors To Develop Their Proposals Accordingly. The Bureau Of Corrections Shall Not Assume Any Responsibility Regarding Erroneous Interpretations Out Of Any Data Presented By The Contractor. The Bucor Super Maximum Prison Facility (phase 2) Shall Be Constructed As Per Approved Drawings, Specifications, Bill Of Materials, Scope Of Works And The General Contract Conditions Following The Guidelines As Per Annex G Of Irr Of Ra 9184. This Project Aims To Be Completed Within A Year, Aligning With Our Decongestion Program. This Expedited Timeline Underscores Our Commitment To Addressing Urgent Needs Within The Correctional System And Providing Timely Solutions For The High Risk Committed Pdl. The Plans And Designs Shall Be In Accordance With The Plan Of The Said Structures As Conceptualized By The Planning And Design Division (pdd) Under. Contractors Shall Be Required To Conduct A Bucor Led Site Inspection And Evaluation To Enable The Contractors To Develop Their Proposals Accordingly. The Bucor Shall Not Assume Any Responsibility Regarding Erroneous Interpretations Out Of Any Data Presented By The Contractor. The Construction Of Super Maximum-security Facility Shall Be Constructed As Per Approved Drawings, Specifications, Bill Of Materials, Scope Of Works And The General Contract Conditions Following The Guidelines As Per Annex G Of Irr Of Ra 9184. The Project Shall Have The Following Basic Components: A. Complete Detailed Architectural And Engineering Design Plans, Technical Specifications, And Design Calculations For The Construction Of The Project. Such Plans, Designs, And Technical Specifications Shall Be Subject For Review And Approval By The Bucor Pdd. The Design Development And The Contract Documents Phases Of The Design Shall Continue After The Bid Is Awarded. It Shall Likewise Be Subject For Review And Approval By The Director Of Directorate For Engineering Services (des). B. The Bid Shall Be Based On The Conceptual/schematic Design Drawings Prepared By The Bucor Pdd Or That Submitted By The Winning Bidder As Defined In Section 3.1.1 Of This Tor. C. The Contractor Shall Complete The Construction Of The Following Facility Component: I. One (1) Unit 2-storey“type B” Pdl Dormitory At Least 3190 Sq.m (gross Area) Polished Flooring And Sandwich Panel Roofing With The Capacity Of Atleast 340 Pdl, 2 Pdl Per Cell With Double Deck Bunk Bed (160 Cells), 1 Pdl Per Cell With Single Bed (20 Cells). The Dormitory To Include Complete Utilities, Power Supply, Cctv, Water Supply, Fire Protection; • Electrical System: Three-phase Power Line Supply, Connected From The Local Electric Utility (from Main Road/ Source To The Compound. The Power Line Shall Be Used For The Future Development Of The 50 Ha Facility. • Electrical System: Backup Power (three-phase Genset) Supply System With Capacity Not Less Than Total Computed Mva Load, Without Demand Factor (designed To Supply The Dormitory), And To Include Capacitor Bank, If Necessary; • Sewerage And Drainage Systems(pipelines To Cover From Project Site To Nearest Tapping Point); • Water Supply System With Sufficient Pressure To Provide The Water Requirement Of The Psdl. The System Is Oncomposed Of A Cistern Tank, Pumps, And An Overhead Water Storage Tank. Deep Well Source Water System (intake Box, Transmission Pipelines, Pressure Break Tanks, Chlorinator With Tanks And Accessories, Etc.) Whichever Is Deemed Most Suitable For The Facility And Is Authorized By The Lgu. • Fire Protection System (fire & Jockey Pump, Pump House), Fire Detection Alarm System And Fire Suppression Equipment Included In Dormitory. • Cctv Systems: To Install Cctv At Perimeter Fence To Monitor The Inside Compound And Dormitory To Monitor The Hallways And Blind Spots. Ii. 3 Meters Height Concrete Perimeter Security Fence With Concertina Above, To Cover 50 Hectares Area (plastered And Painted Finish); Iii. Primary And Secondary Fence For 1.8 Hectares Compound Including Gates, Catwalk And Post Towers (with Cr And Water Supply) (r.a. 10575 Rule 7). • 4 Meters Height Concrete Primary Perimeter Fence (with Catwalks, Concertina Wirings, Post Tower (with Cr And Water Supply) And Solar Lightings, (ra10575). • Secondary Perimeter Fence (3 Layer Concertina, Steel Mesh) With 300w Integrated Solar Light Every 3 Bays And (to Include Post Towers And Gates); Iv. Road Networks And Culverts • All Entry And Exit Point Of Any Bodies Of Water E.g. Creeks, Canals Shall Be Fenced Culvert By Metal Grills (non-corrosive); • The Project Has An Allocated Budget Sufficient To Cover At Least 1440 Sqm Of Road Construction Within The Prison Facility. While This Budget Allows For Road Development, Prioritization Shall Be Given To The Construction Of Culverts, Both Fenced And Road Culverts, To Ensure Adequate Drainage And Prevent Flooding. These Culverts Are Critical For The Road Leading From The Main Road To The Site, As Well As Along The Perimeter Of The Facility. To Accurately Assess The Project Scope And Design, Bidders Are Required To Conduct A Thorough Site Inspection To Identify And Evaluate All Necessary Culverts." 1.2 Contractual Framework The Contractual Arrangement To Be Used For The Project Is The Design-and-build (db) Scheme. Under This Scheme The Procuring Entity Awards A Single Contract For The Architectural/engineering Design And Construction To A Single Firm, Partnership, Corporation, Joint Venture Or Consortium. The Winning Contractor Shall Consult And Collaborate With The Bucor Pdd For The Preparation Of The Detailed Architectural Design Of The Project. The Detailed Architectural And Engineering Design Shall Be Subject For The Review And Approval By The Bucor Pdd. Contractors Shall Be Required To Conduct A Bucor Led Site Inspection And Evaluation To Enable The Contractors To Develop Their Proposals Accordingly. The Bucor Shall Not Assume Any Responsibility Regarding Erroneous Interpretations Out Of Any Data Presented By The Contractor. The Obligations And Liabilities Of The Contractor And Its Architect Shall Be Joint And Solidary For Purposes Of The Detailed Architectural Design Of The Project In Accordance With Article 1723 Of The Civil Code Of The Philippines And Other Pertinent Laws. The Db Scheme Of Procurement Was Recommended, Endorsed, And Adopted Pursuant To The Annex G Of Irr Of Ra 9184. 2. Scope Of Contract 2.1 Obligations Of The Winning Bidder/contractor A. Render Architectural And Allied Engineering Design Services Including Final Schematic Design Necessary For The Implementation Of The Project. The Allied Engineering Design Services Shall Include, But Shall Not Be Limited To, Design For Architectural, Civil, Structural, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, And Electromechanical. All Drawings Shall Be Generated Using Modern Modeling/drafting Software And Printed On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper. B. Undertake Detailed Architectural And Engineering Designs (daeds) Using The Given Data Such As Topographic, Hydrographic And Cross–section Surveys, Geotechnical And Geological Investigation, And Hydrologic Investigation And Initial Schematic Design Or Design Concept Provided By The Bucor Pdd Which Conforms With The Minimum Performance Specifications And Standards (mpss); C. If Applicable, Secure Environmental Clearance Or An “environmental Compliance Certificate (ecc)”. If The Proposed Project Is Considered Outside The Purview Of The Philippine Environmental Impact Statement (eis) System, A Certificate Of Non- Coverage Or Certificate Of Exemption Shall Be Secured. D. The Project Shall Be Constructed According To The Daeds Prepared By The Winning Bidder And Approved By The Bucor And In Compliance With The Mpss As Well As Provided In Rule Vii, Section 7 Of The Irr Of Ra 10575. Likewise, Construction Includes Conformance To The Provisions Pertaining To Buildings Under The Latest Edition Of The Dpwh Standard Specifications For Public Works Structures, Volumes Ii And Iii (blue Book). The Blue Book Prescribes, Among Other Things, The Material Requirements And Construction Requirements For Different Items Of Work, Including The Tests To Be Conducted During Construction By The Dpwh-accredited Testing Laboratory. The Blue Book Incorporates Pertinent Provisions Of The American Society For Testing And Materials (astm) And American Concrete Institute (aci), Among Other Standards, Pertaining To Construction. Attention Shall Be Given To The Relevant Items Of Work In The Following Parts Of The Blue Book: Volume Ii ➢ Part A – Facilities For The Engineer ➢ Part B – Other General Requirements Volume Iii ➢ Part A – Earthwork ➢ Part B – Plain And Reinforced Concrete Works ➢ Part C – Finishing ➢ Part D – Electrical ➢ Part E – Mechanical ➢ Part I – Water Supply ➢ Part J – Flood Control And Drainage ➢ Part I-c – Drainage Works For Materials And Technologies Not Covered By The Blue Book, Or If The Proponent Intends To Use Any New Material/technology Which Is Not Accredited By The Dpwh Bureau Of Research And Standards (brs), The Proponent Shall Submit A Certification From A Recognized Foreign Or International Institution To The Effect That The New Materials Or Technology Meets The Mpss For This Project And Has Been Successfully Used In Existing Structures With Proven Integrity. The Winning Bidder Or Contractor Shall Be Held Liable For Design And Structural Defects And/or Failure Of The Completed Project Within The Warranty Period Specified In Section 62.2 Of The Irr Of Ra 9184; And, F. The Winning Bidder Or Contractor Shall Be Solely Responsible For The Design And Shall Be Held Responsible For Any Default Resulted From Improper Design. Further, Extended Liability Of The Contractor Since It Stipulated That The Works, When Completed, Shall Be Fit For The Purpose For Which It Was Intended As Defined In The Contract. 2.2 Obligations Of The Bucor A. Provide Full Information On All Requirements For The Project; B. Approve The Winning Bidder Or Contractor’s Design Without Diminishing Their Full And Sole Responsibility For The Quality And Integrity Thereof; C. Give Prompt Written Notice Thereof To Winning Bidder Or Contractor, If It Observes Or Becomes Aware Of Any Defect In The Project; D. Designate, When Necessary, Representatives Authorized To Act On Its Behalf. It Shall Examine Documents Submitted By The Winning Bidder Or Contractor And Render Decisions Pertaining Thereto Promptly, To Avoid Unreasonable Delay In The Progress Of Their Work. It Shall Observe The Procedure Of Issuing Orders To The Winning Bidder Or Contractor; E. Supervise And Monitor The Implementation Of The Project; I. Construction Monitoring And Testing Forms: • The Use Of Construction Monitoring And Testing Forms That Will Be Provide By The Bucor - Nhq Pdd Is Mandatory Throughout The Duration Of Construction. • Oversight Of These Forms Will Be Conducted By The Engineering Services (es) Of The Sppf On Behalf Of The Bucor Pdd • Sppf-es To Impose To Contractor Testing Of All Items After Installation And/or Application. Es To Send Pdd Copy Of The Test Report/s. • Sppf-es To Monitor Material Delivery Of Contractor To Ensure All Materials Installed And/or Applied Are In Accordance With The Specifications Stated On Plans And Contract Of This Project. • In Case There Would Be Substitute Or Alternative To The Original Specification Of Material/s, Sppf- Es To Inform Pdd Of Such Variation. Ii. Bucor Engineer Visits: • Nhq Engineers And Architects (personnel Of Pdd) Will Conduct Site Visits On A Quarterly Basis Or Whenever Deemed Necessary To Ensure Compliance With Standards And Regulations. • Pdd Personnel To Witness The Final Testing And Commissioning Of The Systems, Equipment And Utilities Prior To Acceptance Of The Project Or Part Of The Project Thereof. Iii. Progress Billing Payment: • Sppf Es Engineers Will Provide Monthly Updates, Or As Deemed Necessary, On The Statement Of Work Accomplishment Based On The Actual Progress Of The Project, Including Reports Update. F. Pay The Accomplishment Accepted In The Conformance With The Mpss Included Under The Design And Build Contract. I. This Reports And Swa Updates Of The Ippf Es Will Be Reviewed And Approved By Pdd - Nhq Prior To Any Progress Billing Payments Being Made. 2.3 Bidding Documents The Bidding Documents For The Project Shall Govern The Conduct Of The Procurement Of The Project. 3. Scope Of Works 3.1 Planning And Design Phase 3.1.1 Preliminary Architectural Plan (pap) By Bidder The Approved Concept Design Shall Adopt The Provisions Indicated In Rule Vii, Section 7 Of The Irr Of Ra 10575. Bidders Shall Submit Also An Alternative Design Concept With Respect To The Actual Site Condition. This Alternative Design By The Winning Bidder Shall Be Adopted Should The Same Be Found To Be Superior Than The One Conceptualized By The Bucor Pdd. 3.1.2 Detailed Architectural And Engineering Design (daed) By The Winning Bidder During The Implementation Of The Project, The Winning Bidder Shall Prepare The Daed Of The Project And Submit The Same To The Bucor For Approval Prior To The Execution Of The Construction Works. The Winning Bidder Shall Prepare The Daed Based On Its Pap As Reviewed And Accepted By The Bucor Pdd And In Accordance With The Minimum Performance Standards And Specifications (mpss). The Daed Shall Be Undertaken With A Degree Of Accuracy That Will Allow Estimates To Be Made Within Approximately Plus Or Minus Five Percent (+/-5%) Of The Final Quantities. Once Approved By The Bucor, The Winning Bidder’s Daed Shall Form Part Of The Mpss. The Bucor-approved Daed, Together With The Mpss Provisions On Construction Under Section 2.0 Hereof, Shall Govern The Actual Construction Undertaken By The Winning Bidder. The Winning Bidder Shall Undertake The Necessary Field Surveys And Investigation In Accordance With The Dpwh Design Guidelines. In Carrying Out These Works, The Winning Bidder Shall Ensure That The Engineering, Environmental, Particularly During Field Investigations And The Development Of The Preliminary And Final Detailed Engineering Designs. The Winning Bidder Shall Ensure That All Designs Submitted For Approval Have Fully Taken Into Account Key Findings From The Engineering, Environmental, And That Negative Environmental Impacts Have Been Minimized Or Eliminated To The Fullest Extent Possible. 3.1.3 Architectural And Engineering Design Submittals I. Architectural Design A. The Building Should Be Designed With Structural, Electrical, Natural Or Combine Ventilation And Natural Lighting Following Building Design Standards. B. The Prospective Bidder Shall Prepare The Preliminary Architectural Plans In Accordance With The Requirements Of The National Building Code Of The Philippines, Accessibility Law (bp 344) Including All Other Applicable Laws And Local Ordinances. Submittals: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper Minimum Size) 1. Site Development Plan 2. Vicinity Map 3. Perspective 4. Floor Plans 5. Elevations A. Front Elevation B. Rear Elevation C. Right Elevation D. Left Elevation 6. Sections A. Longitudinal Section B. Cross Section 7. Doors & Window Schedule 8. Plans And Details Of Stairs And Ramps 9. Schedule Of Finishes For Floors, Walls And Ceiling 10. Miscellaneous Details Ii. Structural Design A. The Proponent Shall Prepare The Necessary Structural Analysis/calculation And Design Of The Structural Members Of The Building Component In Accordance With The National Building Code Of The Philippines With Its Referral Codes Such As The Latest National Structural Code Of The Philippines. The Design For The Structure Shall Take Into Account, Among Other Things, The Seismic Requirements Of The Area To Determine The Optimum Safety Of The Whole Structure And To Minimize Possible Earthquake Damage. B. On The Basis Of The Data Obtained From The Detailed Site Investigations, Topographical/soil And Survey, Geotechnical Engineering, Foundation Investigation, Material Testing, Survey Of Existing Site Conditions, The Seismic Requirements Of The Area, The Load Requirements Of The Building And Other Investigation Required To Obtain The Data Necessary To Ensure The Safety Of The Structure, The Proposal Shall Prepare The Preliminary Structural Design Plans Of The Structure. Submittals: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper Minimum Size) 1. Structural Design Criteria And Design Notes 2. Foundation Plan 3. Floor Framing Plans 4. Schedule Of Slab, Beams And Girders 5. Schedule Of Columns 6. Schedule Of Footings 7. Structural Details Of Stairs/ramp, If Applicable 8. Roof Framing Plan, If Applicable 9. Schedule And Details Of Trusses, If Applicable 10. Road Design And Details (if Applicable) 11. Miscellaneous Details Iii. Sanitary/plumbing Design A. General • The Detailed Design Shall Conform To The General Standards Adopted By The Sanitary & Plumbing Code Of The Philippines And Other Pertinent Laws And Ordinances. • All Design Considerations/assumptions Shall Be Based On The Results Of The Technical Studies, Detailed Analyses, And Design Computations. • The Technical Drawings And Specifications Shall Clearly Indicate All The Details Required To Ascertain The Care And Thoroughness Devoted In The Preparation Of The Drawings. B. Drainage And Sewerage • The Drainage Layout Shall Show All The Required Information Such As Direction Of Flow, Manhole-to-manhole Distances, And Sizes Of Lines, Manholes/canals, Location Of Outfalls, Etc. • The Prospective Bidder Shall Prepare A Design For The Sewage Treatment Plant In Accordance To The Clean Water Act Of 2004 (republic Act No. 9275) And Other Relevant Laws And Ordinances. Submittals: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper Minimum Size) 1. General Notes 2. Legend & Symbols 3. Sewer, Vent And Storm Drainage Layout 4. Enlarged Toilet Plan For Common And Pwd Toilets 5. Isometric Diagram 6. Miscellaneous Details 7. Drainage And Sewerage System 8. Three Chamber Septic Tank Plans And Details C. Water Supply And Distribution System • The Proponent Shall Carry Out A Preliminary Detailed Design For The Water Supply Of The Project. The Design Should Be On The Basis Of The Source And Volume Of Water Supply, Water Consumption, Piping Network, And Conveyance In Accordance With The Applicable Laws, Rules And Regulations Governing Health, Safety And Sanitation. • The Contractor Shall Install Elevated Water Storage/s Per Unit Located At The Roof Deck Of The Prison Dormitories. (sufficient Capacity To Supply The Pdl) Submittals: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper Minimum Size) 1. General Notes 2. Legend & Symbols 3. Water Line Layout 4. Water Line Isometric Diagram 5. Water Reservoir Plans And Details 6. Miscellaneous Details Iv. Electromechanical Design A. Sewage Treatment Plant • The Prospective Bidder Shall Prepare A Design For The Sewage Treatment Plant In Accordance To The Clean Water Act Of 2004 (republic Act No. 9275) And Other Relevant Laws And Ordinances. Submittals: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper Minimum Size) 1. General Notes 2. Legend & Symbols 3. Electrical System Layout 4. Mechanical System Layout 5. Instrumentation And Control System Diagrams 6. Piping And Instrumentation Diagrams (p&ids) 7. Equipment Details And Specifications 8. Electrical Power Distribution 9. Emergency Power Systems 10. Grounding And Lightning Protection 11. Control And Monitoring Systems, If Applicable 12. Safety Systems 13. Miscellaneous Details B. Fire Protection System • The Prospective Bidder Shall Prepare A Design For The Fire Protection System In Accordance To The Fire Code Of The Philippines, (irr) Of Ra 9514, And Other Relevant Laws And Ordinances. Submittals: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper Minimum Size) 1. Sprinkler System 2. Sprinkler System Isometric Diagram 3. Fire Fighting Piping System Diagram 4. Fire Alarm System Layout 5. Fire Suppression System Layout 6. Smoke Management System Layout 7. Fire Pump And Water Supply 8. Miscellaneous Details V. Electrical Design A. The Prospective Bidder Shall Prepare A Preliminary Design Plan For The Electrical And Power Supply System Of The Building In Accordance With The Electrical Code Of The Philippines, Fire Code Of The Philippines, National Building Code Of The Philippines And Other Relevant Laws And Ordinances. B. The Prospective Bidder Shall Prepare A Design For The Electrical And Power Supply System Considering Ease Of Maintenance And Prevention Of Illegal Connections Including Electrical Supply For Ceiling Fans. C. The Prospective Bidder Shall Prepare A Design For Backup Power Generator With Capacity Not Less Than Total Computed Kva Load Without Demand Factor. D. 3-phase Electrical Supply Shall Be Sourced From The Local Electrical Utility. E. Power Line Connection From Main Source To The Facility Submittals: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality 20” X 30” Blue Print Paper Minimum Size) 1. Power Riser Diagram 2. Power Layout System 3. Lighting Layout System 4. Local Area Network System, If Applicable 5. Grounding System 6. Load Schedules 7. Others As Applicable Vi. Other Requirements  Technical Specifications  Boring Test  Structural Design And Analysis And Computation  Final Design And Construction Plans  Upon Award Of Contract, The Contractor Shall Comply The Following: O Prepare Final Draft Of Architectural And Engineering Design Plans Incorporating All Design Refinements And Revisions Based On Project Requirement Or As May Be Required By The Bucor Pdd Within The Scope Of Design. O Submit To The Bucor Design And Build Committee (bucor-dbc) The Final Architectural And Engineering Design Plans And Specifications Duly Signed And Sealed By The Concerned Professional Architect, Engineers, Incorporating All The Necessary Revisions And Refinements For Approval By The Head Of Procuring Entity. 3.2 Construction Phase The Following Works Shall Comprise This Phase: I. Permits And Clearances, The Contractor Shall Upon Authorization Of The Head Of The Procuring Entity (hope), Make Representations With The Government Agencies Concerned To Expedite The Processing Of The Necessary Permits And Certificates Such As The Following: A. Zoning Certification And Locational Clearance B. Building /electrical/sanitary Permits C. Certificate Of Occupancy D. Environmental Clearance Certificate E. All Other Permits/clearances As May Be Required For The Construction. Ii. Mobilization, The Contractor Shall Mobilize All The Required Project Team Personnel, Equipment, Tools, And Manpower With The Required Skills And In Sufficient Number As May Be Necessary For His Efficient Undertaking Of The Project. Iii. Clearing, Grubbing And Hauling/disposal Of Debris Iv. Construction Stage As A Rule, Contract Implementation Guidelines For Procurement Of Infrastructure Projects Shall Comply With Annex “e” Of The Revised Irr Of Ra 9184. The Following Provisions Shall Supplement These Procedures: I. No Works Shall Commence Unless The Contractor Has Submitted The Prescribed Documentary Requirements And Implementing Unit Has Given Written Approval. Work Execution Shall Be In Accordance With Reviewed And Approved Documents. Ii. The Contractor Shall Be Responsible For Obtaining All Necessary Information As To Risks, Contingencies And Other Circumstances Which May Affect The Works And Shall Prepare And Submit All Necessary Documents Specified By The Implementing Unit To Meet All Regulatory Approvals As Specified In The Contract Documents. Iii. The Contractor Shall Submit A Detailed Program Of Works Within Fourteen (14) Calendar Days After The Issuance Of The Notice To Proceed (ntp) For Approval By The Head Of The Procuring Entity (hope) That Shall Include, Among Others: A. The Order In Which It Tends To Carry Out The Work Including Anticipated Timing For Each Stage Or Design/detailed Engineering And Construction; B. Periods For Review Of Specific Outputs And Any Other Submissions And Approvals; C. Sequence Of Timing For Inspection And Tests; D. General Description Of The Design And Construction Methods To Be Adopted; E. Number Of Personnel To Be Assigned For Each Stage Of The Work; F. List Of Equipment Required On Site For Each Stage Of The Work; And G. Description Of The Quality Control System To Be Utilized For The Project. Iv. Any Errors, Omissions, Inconsistencies, Inadequate Or Failure Submitted By The Contractor That Do Not Comply With The Requirements Shall Be Rectified, Resubmitted And Reviewed At The Contractor’s Cost. If The Contractor Wishes To Modify Any Design Or Document Which Has Been Previously Submitted, Reviewed And Approved, The Contractor Shall Notify The Implementing Unit Within A Reasonable Period Of Time And Shall Shoulder The Cost Of Such Changes. V. As A Rule, Changes In Design And Construction Requirements Shall Be Limited Only To Those That Have Not Been Anticipated In The Contract Signing And Approval. The Following Guidelines Shall Govern Approval For Change Or Variation Order: A. Change Orders Resulting From Design Errors, Omissions Or Non-conformance With The Performance Specifications And Parameters And The Contract Documents By The Contractor Shall Be Implemented By The Contractor At No Additional Cost To The Bureau Of Corrections. B. Provided That The Contractor Suffers Delay And/or Incurs Costs Due To Changes Or Errors In The Preparation Of Performance Specification And Parameters, The Contractor Shall Be Entitled To Either One Of The Following:  An Extension Of Time For Any Such Delays Under Section 10 Of Annex “e” Of Irr-a (ra9184; Or  Payments For Such Cost As Specified In The Contract Documents, Provided That The Cumulative Amount Of The Variation Order Does Not Exceed Ten Percent (10%) Of The Original Project Cost. C. The Contract Documents Shall Include The Manner And Schedule Of Payment Specifying The Estimated Contract Amount And Installments In Which The Contract Will Be Paid. D. The Contractor Shall Be Entitled To Advance Payment Subject To The Provisions Of Section 4 Of Annex “e” Of The Revised Irr Of Ra 9184. E. The Implementing Unit Shall Monitor The Quality Control Procedures For The Design And Construction In Accordance With The Government Guidelines And Shall Issue The Proper Certificates Of Acceptance For Sections Of The Works Or Whole Of The Works As Provided For In The Contract Documents. F. The Contractor Shall Provide All Necessary Equipment, Personnel, Instruments, Documents And Others To Carry Out Specified Tests. G. This Design And Build Project Shall Have Minimum Defects Liability Period Of One (1) Year Contract Completion Or As Provided In The Contract Documents. This Is Without Prejudice To The Liabilities Imposed Upon The Engineer/architect Who Drew Up The Plans And Specification For A Building Sanctioned Under Section 1723 Of The New Civil Code Of The Philippines. H. The Contractor Shall Be Held Liable For Design And Structural Defects And/or Failure Of The Completed Project Within The Warranty Period Of 15 Years For Permanent Structures/buildings And 5 Years For Roads As Specified In Section 62.2.2 Of The Revised Irr Of Ra 9184 V. As-built Plans. The Contractor Shall Cause The Preparation And Submission Of As-built Plans Duly Signed And Sealed By All Concerned Parties Involved In The Construction In The Same Sheet Size And Scale As The Original Drawings In One (1) Blue Print Copy And One (1) Reproducible Copy. Vi. General Requirements: 1. Temporary Facilities Such As Field Offices For The Bucor Inspectorate Team, Project Engineers And Quarters For Laborers; Temporary Warehouse For The Construction Material. 2. Office Furniture And Equipment, Survey Equipment And Consumables 3. Photographs: This Item Consists Of The Supply Of Equipment And Materials, I.e., Album, Necessary To Undertake Photographic Progress Activities Of The Project And Of All Cost Incidental To The Preparation And Submission Of Photographs (at Least 12 Photographs Per Day). The Quantities For Photographs Shall Be One (1) Set Of Photographs Per Month. 4. Health And Safety Program Including Personal Protective Equipment (ppe) A. All Standard Safety Measures And Precautions Shall Be Exercised By The Contractor In The Course Of The Project For The Protection Of The Public And Its Workers And In Conformity With Dole Department Order No. 13, Series Of 1998. B. All Workers Shall Be Equipped With Proper Working Uniform And Identification At All Times. They Must Be Registered With The Governing Bucor Security Office And Must Comply With The Bucor’s Rules And Regulations. C. The Contractor Shall Secure His/her Own Equipment And Materials On Site. The Bucor Shall Not Be Liable To Any Losses Incurred During The Progress Of The Work. 5. Minimum Heavy Equipment Requirement (as Needed) For Site Development Such As: No. Item Specification 1. Backhoe 0.8 Cu. M. 2. Backhoe Wheel Mounted With Breaker 0.90 Cu. M. 3. Cargo/service Truck 2-5 Mt., 160 Hp 4. Dump Truck 12 Cu. Yd. 5. Motorized Road Grader G710a, 140hp 6. Payloader 1.5 Cu. M. 7. Vibrator Roller 10 Mt 8. Bulldozer 170 Hp 9. Scraper 515 Hp 10. Truck Mounted Crane, Hydraulic Telescopic Bommer Capacity: 41 – 45 Mt. 11. Crawler Crane 41-45 Mt 12. Generator Set 300 Kw/375 Kva 13. Water Pump 100mm Suction Dia. 14. One Bagger Mixer 4-6 Ft3/min 15. Concrete Vibrator Ey20, 5hp, 32-70mm 16. Vibro Hammer 45000 Kg-m 17. Excavator 17.5 Kw Or Any Specify Types Of Heavy Equipment Needed For A Site Development Will Be Determined By The Winning Bidder. 6. Environmental Compliance 7. Communication Equipment: This Item Consists Of The Provision Of Communication Equipment. 8. Billboard 9. Traffic Management (if Applicable). Vii. Building Construction 1 Lot One (1) Unit 2-storey“type B” Pdl Dormitory At Least 3190 Sq.m (gross Area) Polished Flooring And Sandwich Panel Roofing With The Capacity Of Atleast 340 Pdl, 2 Pdl Per Cell With Double Deck Bunk Bed (160 Cells), 1 Pdl Per Cell With Single Bed (20 Cells). The Dormitory To Include Complete Utilities, Power Supply, Cctv, Water Supply, Fire Protection; • Electrical System: Three-phase Power Line Supply, Connected From The Local Electric Utility (from Main Road/ Source To The Compound. The Power Line Shall Be Used For The Future Development Of The 50 Ha Facility. • Electrical System: Backup Power (three-phase Genset) Supply System With Capacity Not Less Than Total Computed Mva Load, Without Demand Factor (designed To Supply The Dormitory), And To Include Capacitor Bank, If Necessary; • Sewerage And Drainage Systems(pipelines To Cover From Project Site To Nearest Tapping Point); • Water Supply System With Sufficient Pressure To Provide The Water Requirement Of The Psdl. The System Is Composed Of A Cistern Tank, Pumps, And An Overhead Water Storage Tank. Deep Well Source Water System (intake Box, Transmission Pipelines, Pressure Break Tanks, Chlorinator With Tanks And Accessories, Etc.) Whichever Is Deemed Most Suitable For The Facility And Is Authorized By The Lgu. • Fire Protection System (fire & Jockey Pump, Pump House), Fire Detection Alarm System And Fire Suppression Equipment Included In Dormitory. • Cctv Systems: To Install Cctv At Perimeter Fence To Monitor The Inside Compound And Dormitory To Monitor The Hallways And Blind Spots. 1 Lot 3 Meters Height Concrete Perimeter Security Fence With Concertina Above, To Cover 50 Hectares Area (plastered And Painted Finish); 1 Lot Primary And Secondary Fence For 1.8 Hectares Compound Including Gates, Catwalk And Post Towers (with Cr And Water Supply) (r.a. 10575 Rule 7). • 4 Meters Height Concrete Primary Perimeter Fence (with Catwalks, Concertina Wirings, Post Tower (with Cr And Water Supply) And Solar Lightings, (ra10575). • Secondary Perimeter Fence (3 Layer Concertina, Steel Mesh) With 300w Integrated Solar Light Every 3 Bays And (to Include Post Towers And Gates); 1 Lot Road Networks And Culverts • The Project Has An Allocated Budget Sufficient To Cover At Least 1440 Sqm Of Road Construction Within The Prison Facility. While This Budget Allows For Road Development, Prioritization Shall Be Given To The Construction Of Culverts, Both Fenced And Road Culverts, To Ensure Adequate Drainage And Prevent Flooding. These Culverts Are Critical For The Road Leading From The Main Road To The Site, As Well As Along The Perimeter Of The Facility. • All Entry And Exit Point Of Any Bodies Of Water E.g. Creeks, Canals Shall Be Fenced Culvert By Metal Grills (non-corrosive); • To Accurately Assess The Project Scope And Design, Bidders Are Required To Conduct A Thorough Site Inspection To Identify And Evaluate All Necessary Culverts. A. Material Specifications: A. Floor Finishes • Polished Cement Finish Prison Cell, Hallways, Staircases, And Rooms • Plain Cement Finished - Pathways. • Ramps - Anti Slip Pavers Or Tiles • Crs – Unglazed Ceramic Tiles B. Wall Finishes A. Glazed Wall Tiles - 1.8m Height. B. Plain Cement Plaster Finish - For All Buildings And Facilities C. Ceiling Finishes C. Concrete Steel Decking, If Applicable. – Coated In White Enamel D. Painting D. Semi-gloss Solvent Paint Top Coat (high-end Quality) For Interior And Exterior Walls In Two To Three Coats Application. Apply Concrete Neutralizer For Newly Finished Concrete Surfaces. Use Solvent Primer. E. Varnish Paint Finish With Weather Proof Coating – For Doors And Jambs Branded, High-end Quality (offices, Etc.), All Wooden Doors Must Have Secondary Steel Doors. F. Use Epoxy Paint Primer. Epoxy Paint Finish – For Structural Steel And All Metal Works E. Doors And Windows G. No Doors For Prison Facility Comfort Rooms With 1.20 Meter Finish Wall Height (see Rule Vii, Section 7 R-irr Of Ra 10575). H. Steel Doors And Grills – For Dormitories, Gates And Other Security Areas. Sliding Doors For All Cells (see Rule Vii, Section 7 R-irr Of Ra 10575) F. Waterproofing I. Uv Resistant Polyurethane Waterproofing – For All Roof Deck With Topping Works Provided With Welded Wire Mesh. (at Elevated Water Tank Area) J. Cistern - Polyurethane Waterproofing G. Plumbing Works K. Upvc Pipe Series 1000 – For All Soil, Sewer, Waste, Dry And Wet Vent Piping High-end Quality L. Pprc Fusion Type – For All Water Lines High-end Quality M. Contractor Encouraged To Adapt: Lpf Flush Valve For Water Closet Or Stainless Toilet-lavatory Combination. Waterless Urinals N. Sprinkler System To All Prison Dormitories In Accordance With The Provisions Of Revised Plumbing Code Of The Philippines. O. Contractor To Provide A Water System To Supply The Facility 4. Approved Budget For The Contract (abc) The Approved Budget For The Contract (abc) Is Php 300,000,000. This Is The Ceiling For Acceptable Bids. Bids Higher Than Abc Shall Be Automatically Rejected. 5. Proposed Implementation Schedule (example): No. Of Months 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Design Phase Construction Phase 6. Eligibility Criteria For Bidders 6.1 General The Eligibility Requirements For This Design And Build Project Shall Adopt The Provisions Of Annex “g” Of The Implementing Rules And Regulations Of Ra 9184 (e.g. Eligibility Requirement). However, If A Bidder Who Has No Experience In Db Project On Its Own May Opt To Enter A Subcontracting Agreement, Partnership, Or Joint Venture With A Design Or Engineering Firm For The Design Portion Of The Project. 6.2 Legal Requirements A. Valid Contractor’s License Issued By The Philippine Contractor’s Accreditation Board B. Valid License Of The Contractor’s Designer Issued By The Professional Regulation Commission. 6.3 Technical Requirements A. The Contractor’s Designer Must Have Designed One Structure Similar To The Project At Hand With A Construction Cost Of At Least 50 % Of The Abc. 6.4 Financial Requirements The Contractor Must Have A Net Financial Contracting Capacity (nfcc) At Least Equal To The Abc To Be Bid Or Equivalent To Php300,000,000.00. 7. Contents Of The Bid 7.1 In The First Envelope Class “a” Documents Legal Documents I. Philgeps Certificate Of Registration And Membership In Accordance With Section 8.5.2 Of This Irr. For Procurement To Be Performed Overseas, It Shall Be Subject To The Guidelines To Be Issued By The Gppb. (a) Ii. Pcab License And Registration, In Case Of Jv; 57 Iii. Statement Of All Ongoing Government And Private Contracts; Iv. Statement Of Slcc; V. Nfcc Computation; Vi. Jva, If Applicable; Vii. Bid Security In The Prescribed Form, Amount And Validity Period; Viii. Project Requirements, Which Shall Include The Following: 1. Organizational Chart For The Contract To Be Bid; 2. List Of Contractor’s Personnel (design And Construction), To Be Assigned To The Contract To Be Bid, With Their Complete Qualification And Experience Data; 3. List Of Contractor’s Equipment Units Which Are Owned, Leased And/or Under Purchase Agreements, Supported By Certification Of Availability Of Equipment From Lessor/vendor For The Duration Of The Project. Ix. Omnibus Sworn Statement By The Prospective Bidder Or Its Authorized Representative In The Prescribed Format; X. Submission Of Preliminary Conceptual Design Plans: Class “b” Documents I. For Infrastructure Projects, Jv Bidders Shall Submit A Jva In Accordance With R.a. 4566 And It’s Irr. Ii. Each Partner Of The Joint Venture Shall Submit Their Philgeps Certificates Of Registration In Accordance With Section 8.5.2 Of This Irr. The Submission Of Technical And Financial Eligibility Documents By Any Of The Joint Venture Partners Constitutes Compliance: Provided, That The Partner Responsible To Submit The Nfcc Shall Likewise Submit The Statement Of All Of Its Ongoing Contracts And Audited Financial Statements. 1. Preliminary Conceptual Architectural Design Plans In Accordance With The Degree Of Details Specified By The Procuring Entity: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality A3 Blue Print Paper /digital Print Minimum Size) A. Location Plan/vicinity Map B. Perspective C. Floor Plans D. Front View Elevation E. Rear View Elevation F. Left Side View Elevation G. Right Side View Elevation H. Longitudinal Section I. Transverse Section 2. Design And Construction Method 3. List Of Contractor’s Personnel To Be Assigned To The Contract To Be Bid With Their Complete Qualification And Experience Data And Photocopy Of Their Valid Licenses Issued By The Professional Regulatory Commission (prc), Curriculum Vitae Of Key Staff, Partners Or Principal Officers With A Minimum Work Experience Requirements Set In The Bds; For Design The Key Professionals And The Respective Qualifications Of The Design Personnel Shall Be As Follows: • Principal Architect The Principal Architect Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Ten (10) Years’ Experience In The Design Of Residential, Government Offices Or Institutional Facilities, And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. • Structural Engineer The Structural Engineer Must Be A Duly-licensed Civil Engineer With At Least Ten (10) Years’ Experience In Structural Design And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. • Professional Electrical Engineer The Electrical Engineer Must Be A Registered Professional Electrical Engineer With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In The Design Of Lighting, Power Distribution, Communication Systems (specifically Structured And Local Area Network Cabling, Pabx), Building Management Systems And Preferably Knowledgeable In Developments In Emergent Efficient Lighting Technologies And Energy Management. • Professional Mechanical Engineer The Mechanical Engineer Must Be A Professional Mechanical Engineer With At Least Five (5) Years In Hvac And Fire Protection Systems And Preferably Knowledgeable In Emergent, Alternative Energy- Efficient Hvac Technologies. • Electronics And Communications Engineer The Electronics And Communications Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Ten (5) Years’ Experience In The Design Of Communications Systems, And Preferably Knowledgeable In The Application Of Building Automation And Surveillance Systems. • Sanitary Engineer The Sanitary Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In The Design Of Building Water Supply And Distribution, Plumbing, And Preferably Knowledgeable In Waste Water Management/treatment, And Emergent, Alternative Effluent Collection And Treatment System. The Design & Build Contractor May, As Needed And At Its Own Expense, Add Additional Professionals And/or Support Personnel For The Optimal Performance Of All Architectural And Engineering Design Services, As Stipulated In These Terms Of Reference, For The Project. Prospective Bidders Shall Attach Each Individual’s Resume And Prc License Of The (professional) Staff. Design Personnel May Also Be Utilized For The Construction Phase Provided That The Same Meet The Minimum Number Of Years Of Experience In The Construction Of Similar Projects. For Construction Personnel The Key Professionals And The Respective Qualifications Of The Construction Personnel Shall Be As Follows: • Project Manager The Project Manager Shall Be A Licensed Architect Or Engineer With At Least Eight (8) Years Relevant Experience On Similar And Comparable Projects In Different Locations. The Project Manager Should Have A Proven Record Or Managerial Capability Through The Directing/managing Of Major Civil Engineering Works, Including Projects Of A Similar Magnitude. • Project Architect/engineer The Project Architect/engineer Shall Be A Licensed Architect Or Engineer With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. • Materials Engineer (m.e. I) The Materials Engineer Must Be Duly Accredited With The Dpwh And With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. • Electrical Engineer The Electrical Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects In The Installation Of Lighting, Power Distribution, Communication Systems (specifically Structured And Local Area Network Cabling, Pabx), Building Management Systems. • Mechanical Engineer The Mechanical Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects In The Installation Of Hvac And Fire Protection. • Sanitary Engineer The Sanitary Engineer Must Be Duly-licensed With At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects In The Installation Of Building Water Supply And Distribution, Plumbing. • Foreman The Foreman Must Have At Least Five (5) Years’ Experience In Similar And Comparable Projects And Shall Preferably Be Knowledgeable In The Application Of Rapid Construction Technologies. • Safety Officer The Safety Officer Must Be An Accredited Safety Practitioner By The Department Of Labor And Employment (dole) And Must Have Undergone The Prescribed Forty (40) Hour Construction Safety And Health Training (cosh) And Must Have At Least Two (2) Years’ Experience. 4. Value Engineering Analysis Of Design And Construction. The Second Envelope (financial Proposal) Shall Contain All The Required Documents For Infrastructure Projects Under Section 25.38 Of The Irr Of R.a 9184. 7.2 In The Second Envelope – Financial Proposal The Contents Of Financial Proposal – In The Second Envelope Shall Be Governed By Section 6.1 Design And Build Scheme Of The Dpwh Procurement Manual Volume Ii - Infrastructure Main Guidelines (2016). A. Lump Sum Bid Prices, Which Shall Include The Detailed Engineering Cost, In The Prescribed Bid Form Inclusive Of Vat B. Detailed Estimates Including A Summary Sheet Indicating The Unit Prices Of Construction Materials, Labor Rates And Equipment Rentals Used In Coming Up With The Bid For The Following: I Detailed Architectural And Engineering Design; Ii Demolition Works; And Iii Building Construction/civil Works. C. Bill Of Quantities D. Cash Flow And Payments Schedule. 8. Procedure And Criteria For Bids Evaluation For The Detailed Evaluation Of The Design And Build Proposals A Two-step Procedure Shall Be Adopted By The Bac, Which May Be Undertaken With The Assistance Of The Dbc. First-step Procedure: With The Assistance Of The Bucor Design And Build Committee (bucor-dbc), The Bac Shall Conduct The Opening, Preliminary Examination And Detailed Evaluation Of The Design And Build Proposals, As Follows: (1) The First Step Of The Evaluation Shall Involve The Review Of The Preliminary Conceptual Designs And Track Record Submitted By The Contract As Indicated In The Bidding Documents Using A Nondiscretionary “pass/fail” Criteria That Involve Compliance With The Following Requirements: A. Performance Specifications And Parameters And Degree Of Details; B. Adherence Of Preliminary Design Plans To The Required Concept Of Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design And Construction With Emphasis On The Clarity, Feasibility, Innovativeness And Comprehensiveness Of The Plan Approach, And The Quality Of Interpretation Of Project Problems, Risks, And Suggested Solutions; And C. Quality Of Personnel To Be Assigned To The Project Which Covers Suitability Of Key Staff To Perform The Duties Of The Particular Assignments And General Qualifications And Competence Including Education And Training Of The Key Staff. 8.1 Merit Point Critera For The Bid Evaluation 8.1.1 Adherence To Performance Specifications (35 Points) A. Compliance And Adherence To Specifications: Excellent Compliance (100 Points): The Submission Fully Adheres To All Specified Project Requirements And Regulations, Demonstrating Meticulous Attention To Detail And Comprehensive Understanding Of The Tor. All Drawings And Documentation Are Accurate, Complete, And In Compliance With Relevant Standards. Good Compliance (80 Points): The Submission Largely Complies With Project Specifications And Regulations, With Minor Discrepancies. Drawings And Documentation Are Mostly Accurate And Complete, Meeting The Majority Of Requirements. Acceptable Compliance (70 Points): The Submission Satisfies Most Of The Specified Requirements And Regulations, Albeit With Some Notable Omissions Or Inconsistencies. Drawings And Documentation Are Generally Accurate And Complete, Meeting The Basic Expectations. Some Reservations (50 Points): The Submission Partially Meets The Specified Requirements And Regulations, With Several Notable Deficiencies Or Inconsistencies. There Are Significant Gaps Or Inaccuracies In The Drawings And Documentation, Raising Concerns About Compliance. Serious Reservations (20%) The Submission Falls Significantly Short Of Meeting The Specified Requirements And Regulations, With Major Deficiencies Or Inconsistencies. Drawings And Documentation Lack Essential Details Or Fail To Comply With Key Standards, Casting Doubt On The Bidder's Understanding Of The Project Scope. Unacceptable (0%) The Submission Fails To Comply With The Specified Requirements And Regulations, Lacking Essential Details And Demonstrating A Fundamental Misunderstanding Of The Project Scope. Drawings And Documentation Are Incomplete Or Inaccurate, Indicating A Lack Of Capability To Deliver The Project On Time. B. Functionality And Efficiency: Excellent (100%): The Design Optimally Utilizes Space, Facilitating Efficient Accommodation Of 500 Psdl. Layout And Design Enhance Operational Flow, Demonstrating Exceptional Foresight And Planning. Integration Of Facilities Promotes Smooth Prison Management. Good (80%): The Design Effectively Utilizes Space, With Minor Areas For Improvement In Operational Flow. Layout And Design Contribute To Efficient Prison Management, Meeting Most Functional Requirements. Acceptable (70%): The Design Adequately Utilizes Space, Meeting Basic Requirements For Accommodating 500 Psdl. Layout And Design Support Operational Flow, Though Some Improvements Are Needed For Optimal Functionality. Some Reservations (50%): The Design Partially Optimizes Space Utilization, With Notable Deficiencies In Operational Flow. Layout And Design Hinder Efficient Prison Management, Requiring Significant Adjustments For Improvement. Serious Reservations (20%): The Design Inadequately Utilizes Space, Hindering Accommodation Of 500 Psdl. Layout And Design Severely Impede Operational Flow, Indicating A Lack Of Understanding Of Functional Requirements. Unacceptable (0%): The Design Fails To Optimize Space Utilization, Lacking Consideration For Accommodating 500 Psdl. Layout And Design Pose Significant Obstacles To Efficient Prison Management, Indicating A Fundamental Misunderstanding Of Functional Requirements. C. Safety And Security: Excellent (100%): The Design Features Robust Perimeter Walls, Guard Towers, And Security Features Ensuring Optimal Pdl Containment And Facility Security. Fire Protection And Detection Systems Are Highly Reliable, With Comprehensive Safety Measures For Both Psdl And Staff. Good (80%): The Design Incorporates Effective Perimeter Walls, Guard Towers, And Security Features, With Minor Areas For Enhancement. Fire Protection And Detection Systems Are Reliable, With Adequate Safety Measures For Psdl And Staff. Acceptable (70%) The Design Includes Satisfactory Perimeter Walls, Guard Towers, And Security Features, Meeting Basic Requirements For Pdl Containment And Facility Security. Fire Protection And Detection Systems Are Functional, With Sufficient Safety Measures For Psdl And Staff. Some Reservations (50%): The Design Features Partially Effective Perimeter Walls, Guard Towers, And Security Features, With Notable Deficiencies In Pdl Containment And Facility Security. Fire Protection And Detection Systems Lack Reliability, With Limited Safety Measures For Psdl And Staff. Serious Reservations (20%): The Design Lacks Effective Perimeter Walls, Guard Towers, And Security Features, Compromising Pdl Containment And Facility Security. Fire Protection And Detection Systems Are Inadequate, Posing Significant Risks To Psdl And Staff Safety. Unacceptable (0%): The Design Neglects Perimeter Walls, Guard Towers, And Security Features, Failing To Ensure Pdl Containment And Facility Security. Fire Protection And Detection Systems Are Absent Or Non-functional, Posing Severe Risks To Psdl And Staff Safety. D. Sustainability And Environmental Considerations: Excellent (100%): The Design Includes Robust Safety Measures And Emergency Protocols, Ensuring The Safety And Well-being Of Psdl And Staff In Accordance With Ra 10575. Good (80%): The Design Integrates Sustainable Design Principles Effectively, With Minor Opportunities For Improvement In Energy Efficiency And Material Selection. Sewage Treatment And Water Conservation Measures Are Adequate, Supporting Environmental Sustainability. Acceptable (70%) The Design Includes Basic Sustainable Design Principles, Meeting Minimum Requirements For Energy Efficiency And Material Selection. Sewage Treatment And Water Conservation Measures Are Functional, Contributing To Environmental Sustainability. Some Reservations (50%): The Design Partially Incorporates Sustainable Design Principles, With Notable Deficiencies In Energy Efficiency And Material Selection. Sewage Treatment And Water Conservation Measures Lack Comprehensiveness, Limiting Environmental Sustainability. Serious Reservations (20%): The Design Lacks Consideration For Sustainable Design Principles, Neglecting Energy Efficiency And Eco-friendly Materials. Sewage Treatment And Water Conservation Measures Are Insufficient, Undermining Environmental Sustainability. Unacceptable (0%): The Design Disregards Sustainable Design Principles, Showing No Commitment To Energy Efficiency Or Eco-friendly Materials. Sewage Treatment And Water Conservation Measures Are Absent Or Inadequate, Disregarding Environmental Sustainability. E. Aesthetics And Architectural Design: Excellent (100%): The Design Exhibits Exceptional Aesthetic Appeal And Architectural Coherence, Showcasing Innovative And Visually Pleasing Elements. Consideration Of Local Architectural Vernacular And Contextual Integration Is Evident, Contributing To The Overall Excellence Of The Design. Good (80%): The Design Demonstrates Good Aesthetic Appeal And Architectural Coherence, With Some Areas For Enhancement In Creativity And Visual Impact. Consideration Of Local Architectural Vernacular And Contextual Integration Is Apparent, Enriching The Design. Acceptable (70%): The Design Achieves Acceptable Aesthetic Appeal And Architectural Coherence, Meeting Basic Expectations For Visual Presentation. Consideration Of Local Architectural Vernacular And Contextual Integration Is Present, Though Limited In Scope. Some Reservations (50%): The Design Lacks Significant Aesthetic Appeal And Architectural Coherence, With Notable Deficiencies In Creativity And Visual Impact. Consideration Of Local Architectural Vernacular And Contextual Integration Is Minimal, Detracting From The Overall Quality Of The Design. Serious Reservations (20%): The Design Exhibits Poor Aesthetic Appeal And Architectural Coherence, Failing To Engage Visually Or Inspire Interest. Consideration Of Local Architectural Vernacular And Contextual Integration Is Lacking, Diminishing The Design's Relevance And Appropriateness. Unacceptable (0%): The Design Lacks Any Aesthetic Appeal Or Architectural Coherence, Showing No Effort To Engage Visually Or Integrate With The Local Architectural Vernacular. Consideration Of Contextual Integration Is Absent, Rendering The Design Unsuitable For The Project. 8.1.2 Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design, And Construction (40 Points) Excellent (100%): The Concept Of Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design, And Construction Is Exceptionally Clear, Feasible, Innovative, And Comprehensive. The Plan Demonstrates A High Level Of Understanding Of Project Problems, Risks, And Suggested Solutions, With Well-defined Strategies For Addressing Them. Good (80%): The Concept Of Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design, And Construction Is Clear, Feasible, And Comprehensive, With Some Innovative Elements. The Plan Adequately Addresses Project Problems, Risks, And Suggested Solutions, Though Some Areas May Require Further Development. Acceptable (70%): The Concept Of Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design, And Construction Satisfactorily Addresses Project Requirements, With A Basic Level Of Clarity And Feasibility. The Plan Outlines Strategies For Addressing Project Problems, Risks, And Suggested Solutions, Meeting The Minimum Expectations. Some Reservations (50%): The Concept Of Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design, And Construction Partially Addresses Project Requirements, With Notable Gaps In Clarity And Feasibility. The Plan Lacks Innovative Elements And May Inadequately Address Project Problems, Risks, And Suggested Solutions. Serious Reservations (20%): The Concept Of Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design, And Construction Demonstrates Significant Deficiencies In Clarity, Feasibility, And Comprehensiveness. The Plan Fails To Adequately Address Project Problems, Risks, And Suggested Solutions, Indicating A Lack Of Understanding Or Inadequate Planning. Unacceptable (0%): The Concept Of Approach And Methodology For Detailed Engineering, Design, And Construction Is Unclear, Infeasible, And Lacks Comprehensiveness. The Plan Fails To Address Project Problems, Risks, And Suggested Solutions, Indicating A Fundamental Misunderstanding Or Disregard For Project Requirements. 8.1.3 Quality Of Personnel Assigned To The Project (25 Points) Excellent (100%): The Personnel Assigned To The Project, Including Key Staff, Are Highly Suitable And Competent To Perform Their Duties. Key Staff Members Possess Exceptional Qualifications, Competence, Education, And Training Relevant To Their Roles, Demonstrating A High Level Of Expertise And Experience. Good (80%): The Personnel Assigned To The Project, Including Key Staff, Are Suitable And Competent To Perform Their Duties Effectively. Key Staff Members Possess Relevant Qualifications, Competence, Education, And Training, Demonstrating Solid Expertise And Experience. Acceptable (70%): The Personnel Assigned To The Project, Including Key Staff, Meet The Basic Requirements For Suitability And Competence In Performing Their Duties. Key Staff Members Possess General Qualifications And Competence, Education, And Training Relevant To Their Roles, Meeting The Minimum Expectations. Some Reservations (50%): The Personnel Assigned To The Project, Including Key Staff, Demonstrate Some Suitability And Competence In Performing Their Duties, But Notable Deficiencies Are Present. Key Staff Members May Lack Certain Qualifications, Competence, Education, Or Training, Raising Concerns About Their Ability To Effectively Fulfill Their Roles. Serious Reservations (20%): The Personnel Assigned To The Project, Including Key Staff, Exhibit Significant Deficiencies In Suitability And Competence To Perform Their Duties. Key Staff Members Lack Essential Qualifications, Competence, Education, Or Training, Indicating A Lack Of Expertise Or Experience Relevant To Their Roles. Unacceptable (0%): The Personnel Assigned To The Project, Including Key Staff, Are Unsuitable And Incompetent To Perform Their Duties Effectively. Key Staff Members Lack The Necessary Qualifications, Competence, Education, And Training, Demonstrating A Fundamental Mismatch With The Requirements Of Their Roles. 8.2 Determination Of The Merit Point Score The Aggregate Of The Scores In Each Criterion Must Be 70% Or More To Pass Using The Following Formula In Equation. Description Weight (w) Rating (r) Criteria 1 35% (smax/sact) Criteria 2 40% Sact Criteria 3 25% Sact Smax = Η (100) Sact = R1 +r2 +r3 + . . .(rη) Where Η = Number Of Sub Criteria R = Rating Given To The Criteria/sub Criteria The Actual Score (sact) For Each Of The Criteria/sub Criteria Is Obtained By Adding All The Given Rating. (smax) Is The Summation Of Maximum Score Per Criteria 8.3 Passing Rate The Specific Passing Rate Value Depends On The Specific Context Of The Project, The Priorities Of The Design And Build Committee, And The Complexity Of The Requirements Outlined In Ra 10575. Based On The Provided Criteria And Descriptions, The Passing Rate For The Merit Point Criteria (mpc) Could Be Set At 75%. This Means That Bidders Must Score At Least 75% Or Higher In The Evaluation Process To Be Considered As Meeting The Minimum Requirements For The Project A. Pass Rate Per Criteria Will Be Determined Using The Formula: Score = W1*r1 + W2*r2 + W3*r3 B. A Bid Or Technical Bid That Failed In Any Of The Criteria’s Will Not Be Considered For Further Evaluation C. Score Above 75% Will Be Considered As Technically Responsive. Aggregate Score Of Less Than 75% Will Be Considered Failed, And May Be Rejected On That Basis. Second-step Procedure: Only Those Bids That Passed The Above Criteria Shall Be Subjected To The Second Step Of Evaluation. The Bac Shall Open The Financial Proposal Of Each “passed” Bidder And Shall Evaluate It Using Non-discretionary Criteria – Including Arithmetical Corrections For Computational Errors – As Stated In The Bidding Documents, And Thus Determine The Correct Total Calculated Prices. The Bac Shall Automatically Disqualify Any Total Calculated Bid Price Which Exceeds The Abc 9. Data To Be Provided By The Bucor These Data Are For Reference Only And Does Not Guarantee The Contractor That The Data Provided Are Correct, Free From Error, And Applicable To The Project At Hand. The Contractor Is Responsible For The Accuracy Or Applicability Of Any Data That He Will Use In His Design– Build Proposal And Services. Sample Data For Buildings: A. Conceptual Plans 10. Documents To Be Provided By The Contractor During Contract Implementation A. Detailed Architectural And Engineering Plans B. Design Analysis C. Survey Data D. Quantity Calculation E. Detailed Geotechnical Investigation Report F. Design Report. G. As-built Plans, (printed Including Cad Files And Bim Files (lod 500) H. Other Relevant Documents 11. Design And Build Period The Winning Bidder Shall Commence Actual Works Upon The Issuance By The Bucor Of The Notice To Proceed (ntp). The Winning Bidder Shall Complete The Daed And Submit Within The Ninety (60) Calendar Days (cds) Period To The Bucor For Review And Approval. The Contractor Shall Complete The Construction Of The Building Within 305 Cds For The Total Contract Duration Of 365 Cd. Conforme: Name Of Company In Print Signature Over Printed Name Of Authorized Representative/date Section Vii. Drawings The Conceptual Drawings Should Be Attached To This Section Or Annexed In A Separate Folder As Part Of The First Envelope (technical Component Envelope). Preliminary Conceptual Architectural Design Plans In Accordance With The Degree Of Details Specified By The Procuring Entity: At Suitable Scale On High Quality A3 Blue Print Paper /digital Print Minimum Size) 1. Location Plan/vicinity Map 2. Perspective 3. Floor Plans 4. Front View Elevation 5. Rear View Elevation 6. Left Side View Elevation 7. Right Side View Elevation 8. Longitudinal Section 9. Transverse Section Section Viii. Bill Of Quantities The Bill Of Quantities Should Be Attached To This Section As Part Of The Second Envelope (financial Component Envelope). Section Ix. Checklist Of Technical And Financial Documents Checklist Of Technical And Financial Documents I. Technical Component Envelope Class “a” Documents Legal Documents ⬜ (a) Valid Philgeps Registration Certificate (platinum Membership) (all Pages) In Accordance With Section 8.5.2 Of The Irr; Technical Documents ⬜ (b) Statement Of The Prospective Bidder Of All Its Ongoing Government And Private Contracts, Including Contracts Awarded But Not Yet Started, If Any, Whether Similar Or Not Similar In Nature And Complexity To The Contract To Be Bid; And ⬜ (c) Statement Of The Bidder’s Single Largest Completed Contract (slcc) Similar To The Contract To Be Bid, Except Under Conditions Provided Under The Rules; And ⬜ (d) Special Pcab License In Case Of Joint Ventures And Registration For The Type And Cost Of The Contract To Be Bid; And ⬜ (e) Original Copy Of Bid Security. If In The Form Of A Surety Bond, Submit Also A Certification Issued By The Insurance Commission Or Original Copy Of Notarized Bid Securing Declaration; And (f) Project Requirements, Which Shall Include The Following: ⬜ A. Organizational Chart For The Contract To Be Bid; ⬜ B. List Of Contractor’s Key Personnel (e.g., Project Manager, Project Engineers, Materials Engineers, And Foremen), To Be Assigned To The Contract To Be Bid With Their Complete Qualification And Experience Data And Photocopy Of Their Valid Licenses Issued By The Professional Regulatory Commission (prc) And Curriculum Vitae Of Key Staff, Partners Or Principal Officers With A Minimum Work Experience Requirements Set In The Bds; ⬜ C. List Of Contractor’s Major Equipment Units, Which Are Owned, Leased, And/or Under Purchase Agreements, Supported By Proof Of Ownership Or Certification Of Availability Of Equipment From The Equipment Lessor/vendor For The Duration Of The Project, As The Case May Be; And ⬜ (g) Original Duly Signed Omnibus Sworn Statement (oss); And If Applicable, Original Notarized Secretary’s Certificate Or Board Resolution/partnership Resolution In Case Of A Corporation, Partnership, Or Cooperative; Or Original Notarized Special Power Of Attorney In Case Of Sole Proprietorship Of All Members Of The Joint Venture Giving Full Power And Authority To Its Officer To Sign The Oss And Do Acts To Represent The Bidder. And ⬜ (h) Conformity With The Technical Specifications (scope Of Work); And ⬜ (i) Preliminary Conceptual Architectural Design Plans In Accordance With The Degree Of Details Specified By The Procuring Entity: (at Suitable Scale On High Quality A3 Blue Print Paper /digital Print Minimum Size) 1. Location Plan/vicinity Map 2. Perspective 3. Floor Plans 4. Front View Elevation 5. Rear View Elevation 6. Left Side View Elevation 7. Right Side View Elevation 8. Longitudinal Section 9. Transverse Section ⬜ (j) Design And Construction Method And ⬜ (k) Value Engineering Analysis Of The Design And Construction Method. And Financial Documents ⬜ (l) The Prospective Bidder’s Computation Of Net Financial Contracting Capacity (nfcc) At Least Equal To The Abc. And Class “b” Documents ⬜ (m) Jv Bidders Shall Submit A Jva In Accordance With R.a. 4566 And Its Irr. Each Partner Of The Joint Venture Shall Submit Their Respective Philgeps Certificates Of Registration In Accordance With Section 8.5.2 Of This Irr. The Submission Of Technical And Financial Eligibility Documents By Any Of The Joint Venture Partners Constitutes Compliance: Provided, That The Partner Responsible To Submit The Nfcc Shall Likewise Submit The Statement Of All Of Its Ongoing Contracts And Audited Financial Statements. Ii. Financial Component Envelope ⬜ (n) Original Of Duly Signed And Accomplished Financial Bid Form; And Other Documentary Requirements Under Ra No. 9184 ⬜ (o) Original Of Duly Signed Bid Prices In The Bill Of Quantities; And ⬜ (p) Duly Accomplished Detailed Estimates Form, Including A Summary Sheet Indicating The Unit Prices Of Construction Materials, Labor Rates, And Equipment Rentals Used In Coming Up With The Bid; And ⬜ (q) Cash Flow And Payment Schedule. Bidding Form Company Letterhead Statement Of Ongoing Government & Private Contracts Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) Statement Of All Its Ongoing Government And Or Private Contracts Including Contracts Awarded But Not Yet Started, If Any Whether Similar Or Not Similar In Nature. Name Of Contract Date Of Contract Contract Duration Owner’s Name And Address Nature Of Work Contractor’s Role (whether Sole Contractor, Subcontractor, Or Partner In A Jv) And Percentage Of Participation Total Contract Value At Award Date Of Completion Or Estimated Completion Time Value Of Outstanding Works Certified Correct: Name And Signature Of Authorized Representative Position Date Company Letterhead Statement Of Single Largest Completed Contract Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) Statement Of Single (1) Largest Completed Contract Of Similar In Nature Within The Last Six (6) Years From The Date Of Submission And Receipt Of Bids Amounting To At Least Fifty Percent (50%) Of The Approved Budget Of The Contract (abc) Name Of Contract Date Of Contract Contract Duration Owner’s Name And Address Nature Of Work Contractor’s Role (whether Sole Contractor, Subcontractor, Or Partner In A Jv) And Percentage Of Participation Total Contract Value At Award Amount Of Completed Contracts, Adjusted By The Bidder To Current Prices Using Psa’s Consumer Price Index, If Necessary Date Of Completion Or Estimated Completion Time Certified Correct: Name And Signature Of Authorized Representative Position Date Company Letterhead Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) Republic Of The Philippines) City Of _______________________) S.s. X------------------------------------------------------x Bid Securing Declaration Invitation To Bid: [insert Reference Number] To: Bureau Of Corrections I/we, The Undersigned, Declare That: 1. I/we Understand That, According To Your Conditions, Bids Must Be Supported By A Bid Security, Which May Be In The Form Of A Bid-securing Declaration. 2. I/we Accept That: (a) I/we Will Be Automatically Disqualified From Bidding For Any Contract With Any Procuring Entity For A Period Of Two (2) Years Upon Receipt Of Your Blacklisting Order; And, (b) I/we Will Pay The Applicable Fine Provided Under Section 6 Of The Guidelines On The Use Of Bid Securing Declaration, Within Fifteen (15) Days From Receipt Of The Written Demand By The Procuring Entity For The Commission Of Acts Resulting To The Enforcement Of The Bid Securing Declaration Under Sections 23.1(b), 34.2, 40.1 And 69.1, Except 69.1(f), Of The Irr Of Ra 9184; Without Prejudice To Other Legal Action The Government May Undertake. 3. I/we Understand That This Bid Securing Declaration Shall Cease To Be Valid On The Following Circumstances: (a) Upon Expiration Of The Bid Validity Period, Or Any Extension Thereof Pursuant To Your Request; (b) I Am/we Are Declared Ineligible Or Post-disqualified Upon Receipt Of Your Notice To Such Effect, And (i) I/we Failed To Timely File A Request For Reconsideration Or (ii) I/we Filed A Waiver To Avail Of Said Right; (c) I Am/we Are Declared The Bidder With The Lowest Calculated Responsive Bid, And I/we Have Furnished The Performance Security And Signed The Contract. In Witness Whereof, I/we Have Hereunto Set My/our Hand/s This ____ Day Of [month] [year] At [place Of Execution]. ______________________________________________________ [insert Name Of Bidder’s Authorized Representative] _____________________________ [insert Signatory’s Legal Capacity] Affiant Subscribed And Sworn To Before Me This ___ Day Of [month] [year] At [place Of Execution], Philippines. Affiant/s Is/are Personally Known To Me And Was/were Identified By Me Through Competent Evidence Of Identity As Defined In The 2004 Rules On Notarial Practice (a.m. No. 02-8-13-sc). Affiant/s Exhibited To Me His/her [insert Type Of Government Identification Card Used], With His/her Photograph And Signature Appearing Thereon, With No. ____________ Issued On ______________ At ___________________________________. Witness My Hand And Seal This ___ Day Of [month] [year]. Name Of Notary Public Serial No. Of Commission _______________ Notary Public For _______ Until __________ Roll Of Attorneys No. __________________ Ptr No. ______ [date Issued], [place Issued] Ibp No. ______ [date Issued], [place Issued Doc. No. _____ Page No. _____ Book No. _____ Series Of ____ Company Letterhead Omnibus Sworn Statement Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) _________________________________________________________________________ Republic Of The Philippines ) City/municipality Of ______ ) S.s. Affidavit I, [name Of Affiant], Of Legal Age, [civil Status], [nationality], And Residing At [address Of Affiant], After Having Been Duly Sworn In Accordance With Law, Do Hereby Depose And State That: 1. [select One, Delete The Other:] [if A Sole Proprietorship:] I Am The Sole Proprietor Or Authorized Representative Of [name Of Bidder] With Office Address At [address Of Bidder]; [if A Partnership, Corporation, Cooperative, Or Joint Venture:] I Am The Duly Authorized And Designated Representative Of [name Of Bidder] With Office Address At [address Of Bidder]; 2. [select One, Delete The Other:] [if A Sole Proprietorship:] As The Owner And Sole Proprietor, Or Authorized Representative Of [name Of Bidder], I Have Full Power And Authority To Do, Execute And Perform Any And All Acts Necessary To Participate, Submit The Bid, And To Sign And Execute The Ensuing Contract For Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) Of The Bureau Of Corrections, As Shown In The Attached Duly Notarized Special Power Of Attorney; [if A Partnership, Corporation, Cooperative, Or Joint Venture:] I Am Granted Full Power And Authority To Do, Execute And Perform Any And All Acts Necessary To Participate, Submit The Bid, And To Sign And Execute The Ensuing Contract For Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) Of The Bureau Of Corrections, As Shown In The Attached [state Title Of Attached Document Showing Proof Of Authorization (e.g., Duly Notarized Secretary’s Certificate, Board/partnership Resolution, Or Special Power Of Attorney, Whichever Is Applicable;)]; 3. [name Of Bidder] Is Not “blacklisted” Or Barred From Bidding By The Government Of The Philippines Or Any Of Its Agencies, Offices, Corporations, Or Local Government Units, Foreign Government/foreign Or International Financing Institution Whose Blacklisting Rules Have Been Recognized By The Government Procurement Policy Board, By Itself Or By Relation, Membership, Association, Affiliation, Or Controlling Interest With Another Blacklisted Person Or Entity As Defined And Provided For In The Uniform Guidelines On Blacklisting; 4. Each Of The Documents Submitted In Satisfaction Of The Bidding Requirements Is An Authentic Copy Of The Original, Complete, And All Statements And Information Provided Therein Are True And Correct; 5. [name Of Bidder] Is Authorizing The Head Of The Procuring Entity Or Its Duly Authorized Representative(s) To Verify All The Documents Submitted; 6. [select One, Delete The Rest:] [if A Sole Proprietorship:] The Owner Or Sole Proprietor Is Not Related To The Head Of The Procuring Entity, Members Of The Bids And Awards Committee (bac), The Technical Working Group, And The Bac Secretariat, The Head Of The Project Management Office Or The End-user Unit, And The Project Consultants By Consanguinity Or Affinity Up To The Third Civil Degree; [if A Partnership Or Cooperative:] None Of The Officers And Members Of [name Of Bidder] Is Related To The Head Of The Procuring Entity, Members Of The Bids And Awards Committee (bac), The Technical Working Group, And The Bac Secretariat, The Head Of The Project Management Office Or The End-user Unit, And The Project Consultants By Consanguinity Or Affinity Up To The Third Civil Degree; [if A Corporation Or Joint Venture:] None Of The Officers, Directors, And Controlling Stockholders Of [name Of Bidder] Is Related To The Head Of The Procuring Entity, Members Of The Bids And Awards Committee (bac), The Technical Working Group, And The Bac Secretariat, The Head Of The Project Management Office Or The End-user Unit, And The Project Consultants By Consanguinity Or Affinity Up To The Third Civil Degree; 7. [name Of Bidder] Complies With Existing Labor Laws And Standards; And 8. [name Of Bidder] Is Aware Of And Has Undertaken The Responsibilities As A Bidder In Compliance With The Philippine Bidding Documents, Which Includes: A. Carefully Examining All Of The Bidding Documents; B. Acknowledging All Conditions, Local Or Otherwise, Affecting The Implementation Of The Contract; C. Making An Estimate Of The Facilities Available And Needed For The Contract To Be Bid, If Any; And D. Inquiring Or Securing Supplemental/bid Bulletin(s) Issued For The Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase). 9. [name Of Bidder] Did Not Give Or Pay Directly Or Indirectly, Any Commission, Amount, Fee, Or Any Form Of Consideration, Pecuniary Or Otherwise, To Any Person Or Official, Personnel Or Representative Of The Government In Relation To Any Procurement Project Or Activity. 10. In Case Advance Payment Was Made Or Given, Failure To Perform Or Deliver Any Of The Obligations And Undertakings In The Contract Shall Be Sufficient Grounds To Constitute Criminal Liability For Swindling (estafa) Or The Commission Of Fraud With Unfaithfulness Or Abuse Of Confidence Through Misappropriating Or Converting Any Payment Received By A Person Or Entity Under An Obligation Involving The Duty To Deliver Certain Goods Or Services, To The Prejudice Of The Public And The Government Of The Philippines Pursuant To Article 315 Of Act No. 3815 S. 1930, As Amended, Or The Revised Penal Code. In Witness Whereof, I Have Hereunto Set My Hand This __ Day Of ___, 2024 At ____________, Philippines. _____________________________________ Bidder’s Representative/authorized Signatory Affiant Subscribed And Sworn To Before Me This ___ Day Of [month] [year] At [place Of Execution], Philippines. Affiant/s Is/are Personally Known To Me And Was/were Identified By Me Through Competent Evidence Of Identity As Defined In The 2004 Rules On Notarial Practice (a.m. No. 02-8-13-sc). Affiant/s Exhibited To Me His/her [insert Type Of Government Identification Card Used], With His/her Photograph And Signature Appearing Thereon, With No. ____________ And Issued On ____________________ At _____________________. Witness My Hand And Seal This ___ Day Of [month] [year]. Name Of Notary Public Serial No. Of Commission _______________ Notary Public For _______ Until __________ Roll Of Attorneys No. __________________ Ptr No. ______ [date Issued], [place Issued] Ibp No. ______ [date Issued], [place Issued] Doc. No. _____ Page No. _____ Book No. _____ Series Of _____ Company Letterhead Certificate Of Net Financial Contracting Capacity Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) (please Show Figures At How You Arrived At The Nfcc) This Is To Certify That Our Net Financial Contracting Capacity (nfcc) Is _____________________ (p____________) Which Is At Least Equal To The Total Ceiling Price We Are Bidding. The Amount Is Computed As Follows: (please Show Computation Of Nfcc) Nfcc = (ca-cl) (15) – C Where: Ca = Current Assets Cl = Current Liabilities C = Value Of All Outstanding Or Uncompleted Portions Of The Projects Under Going Contracts, Including Awarded Contracts Yet To Be Started Coinciding With The Contract For This Project Note: The Values Of The Bidder’s Current Assets And Current Liabilities Shall Be Based On The Audited Financial Statement Submitted To The Bir. Issued This _________________day Of ________________, 2024 _______________________________________________ Name & Signature Of Authorized Representative ____________________ Position _______________ Date Company Letterhead Bid Form Date: Ib No: To Bids And Awards Committee Bureau Of Corrections Nbp Reservation Muntinlupa City We, The Undersigned, Declare That: (a) We Have Examined And Have No Reservation To The Bidding Documents, Including Addenda, For The Contract Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) At Sablayan Prison And Penal Farm (sppf) (b) We Offer To Execute The Works For This Contract In Accordance With The Bid And Bid Data Sheet, General And Special Conditions Of Contract Accompanying This Bid; The Total Price Of Our Bid, Excluding Any Discounts Offered Below Is: ________________________________________₱_________________; The Discounts Offered And The Methodology For Their Application Are: [insert Information]; (c) Our Bid Shall Be Valid For A Period Of 120 Calendar Days From The Date Fixed For The Bid Submission Deadline In Accordance With The Bidding Documents, And It Shall Remain Binding Upon Us And May Be Accepted At Any Time Before The Expiration Of That Period; (d) If Our Bid Is Accepted, We Commit To Obtain A Performance Security In The Amount Of 30% Percent Of The Contract Price For The Due Performance Of The Contract; (e) Our Firm, Including Any Subcontractors Or Suppliers For Any Part Of The Contract, Have Nationalities From The Following Eligible Countries; (f) We Are Not Participating, As Bidders, In More Than One Bid In This Bidding Process, Other Than Alternative Offers In Accordance With The Bidding Documents; (g) Our Firm, Its Affiliates Or Subsidiaries, Including Any Subcontractors Or Suppliers For Any Part Of The Contract, Has Not Been Declared Ineligible By The Funding Source; (h) We Understand That This Bid, Together With Your Written Acceptance Thereof Included In Your Notification Of Award, Shall Constitute A Binding Contract Between Us, Until A Formal Contract Is Prepared And Executed; And (i) We Understand That You Are Not Bound To Accept The Lowest Calculated Bid Or Any Other Bid That You May Receive. (j) We Likewise Certify/confirm That The Undersigned, Is The Duly Authorized Representative Of The Bidder, And Granted Full Power And Authority To Do, Execute And Perform Any And All Acts Necessary To Participate, Submit The Bid, And To Sign And Execute The Ensuing Contract For The Design And Build Of Bureau Of Corrections Supermaximum Prison Facility (2nd Phase) Of The Bureau Of Corrections. (k) We Acknowledge That Failure To Sign Each And Every Page Of This Bid Form, Including The Bill Of Quantities, Shall Be A Ground For The Rejection Of Our Bid. Name: In The Capacity Of: Signed: Duly Authorized To Sign The Bid For And On Behalf Of: Date: ___________

Details: This Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualifications Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder/plan Holder List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse, Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. 1. General Information Veterans Health Administration (vha) Program Contracting Activity Central (pcac) Is Seeking Sources And Intends To Award A Firm Fixed Price Design Contract For Architect-engineering (a-e) Services For The Development Of Complete Construction Documents, Which Include Working Drawings, Specifications, And Reports, And Construction Period Services For Project #676-336 Fire Station Design-tomah Va Medical Center. The A-e Services Contract That Is Anticipated To Be Awarded Will Be Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Statute [formerly Known As The Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36.6 Architectural And Engineering Services, Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 836.6, And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) M836.6 Architect-engineer Services. In Accordance With Far 36.209, Construction Contracts With Architect-engineer Firms, No Contract For The Construction Of A Project Shall Be Awarded To The Firm That Designed The Project Or Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, Except With The Approval Of The Head Of The Agency Or Authorized Representative. 2. Project Information This Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541330 Engineering Services And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $25.5m. A Full Design Team Is Required To Complete This Project. The Va Expects To Award The Anticipated A-e Contract By Late March 2025. The Anticipated Period Of Performance For Completion Of Design Is 160 Calendar Days After Notice Of Award (noa). The Vaar Magnitude Of Construction Is Between $5,000,000 And $10,000,000. Please Note That The 160-calendar-day Period Of Performance For The Design Completion Begins With The Issuance Of The Noa And That A Notice To Proceed (ntp) Will Not Be Issued For The Completion Of A Design Project. 3. A-e Selection Process Firms Submitting Sf 330s In Response To This Announcement, Not Later Than The Closing Date And Time Specified Herein And In Accordance With Submission Requirements, Will Be Considered For Evaluation. The Selection Will Be Made As Follows: Sf 330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Primary Selection Criteria As Stated In This Pre-solicitation Notice. These Evaluations Will Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms For This Particular Requirement. In Accordance With Far 36.602-3(c), At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Then Be Notified Of The Government S Intent To Hold Discussions. All Firms Not Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified At This Time. In Accordance With Far 36.607(b), Any Requested Debriefings Of Successful And Unsuccessful Firms Will Be Held After Final Selection Has Taken Place And Will Be Conducted, To The Extent Practicable, In Accordance With 15.503, 15.506(b) Through (f), And 15.507(c). Note That 15.506(d)(2) Through (d)(5) Do Not Apply To Architect-engineer Contracts. Discussions Will Be Held With The Most Highly Qualified Firms In The Form Of Written Responses. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Email And Provided Further Instructions, Including Any Questions Or Topics To Address. Following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Based On The Primary And (if Necessary) Secondary Selection Criteria. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Sf 330 Submission For Each Firm, As Well As Additional Information Obtained Via Discussions. The Highest Rated Firm Will Be Selected To Receive The Solicitation And Engage In Negotiations. The Solicitation Will Be Issued To The Highest Rated Firm As A Request For Fee Proposal (rfp). All Sow Attachments And Site-specific Documentation Will Be Provided To The Highest Rated Firm With The Rfp. A Site Visit Will Be Authorized During The Negotiation Process. An Award Will Then Be Made As Long As The Negotiation Of Rates And Hours Leads To A Fair And Reasonable Determination Of The Final Contract Price. If Negotiations With The Highest Rated Firm Are Unsuccessful, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until Award Can Be Made. 4. Selection Criteria: Firms Responding To This Notice Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Using The Primary And Secondary Selection Criteria Listed Below. The Factors Are Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. The Evaluation Will Consider How Each Factor Is Addressed And How It Is Formatted To Coincide With The Selection Criteria. Primary Selection Criteria: Professional Qualifications: Professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service. The A-e Shall Demonstrate They Are Able To Sign And Stamp Each Drawing By Individuals Licensed In Any State In The United States For The Key Positions Listed Below. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm As Full-time Employees) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. Disciplines Requiring A Florida License Include Civil/structural And Hazardous Material Abatement/industrial Hygiene. A Resume For Each Of These Key Positions Must Be Provided In Section E Of The Sf330. Key Positions And Disciplines Required For This Project Include, But Are Not Limited To: Architect (leed Certification/us Green Build Council Certification) Cost Estimator Civil Engineer Electrical Engineer Environmental Engineer Fire Protection Engineer Mechanical Engineer Plumbing Engineer Project Manager Quality Assurance Manager Structural Engineer Physical Security Specialists Commissioning Agent Offeror Must Include The Following Statement Of Sdvosb Compliance When Submitting The Personnel Proposed To Perform The Work Under This Requirement: I, [signatory Authority], Of [company Name], Certify That The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance To Firms That Are Not Certified Sdvosbs Listed In The Sba Certification Database In Compliance With Vaar 852.219-73. The Information Provided In Sections C Through E Of The Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate This Factor. Do Not Include This Information In Section H Unless It Is Pertinent To Support The Information Listed In The Other Sections. Specialized Experience And Technical Competence: Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Design And Construction Period Services Shall Be Provided For Network Infrastructure Installation, Renovations, Or Upgrades. Projects Experience Should Include Upgrading Large Scale (multi-building With Multiple Generational Oit Systems) Fiber Optics, Data Cable, Structured Cabling, Electrical Distribution Design, Electrical Upgrades, Uninterruptable Power Systems (ups), Electrical Bonding, Building Management Systems/building Automation Systems (bms/bas), Hvac, It Room Renovations/expansion/relocations, Data Centers/server Rooms Reconfiguration, And Physical Security Upgrades, Duct Bank And Direct Boring Operations. Other Specialized Experience To Provide Should Include Experience In Critical Path Scheduling, Fire Protection, Construction Infection Control Protocols, Energy Conservation, Transition, And Sustainable Design Practices. Submissions Shall Include No More And No Less Than Five (5) Recent And Relevant Government And Private Experience Projects Similar In Size, Scope, And Complexity, And Experience With The Type Of Projects/competence Above. Relevant Is Defined As Those Task Requirements Identified In The Statement Of Work. Recent Is Defined As Services Provided Within The Past Five (5) Years. Include The Following For Each Submitted Project: Project Title And Location Detailed Narrative Describing The Scope Of Services Provided, Including The Type Of Work Performed By The Offeror And Its Role In The Project (i.e., Prime Contractor, Teaming Partner, Or Subcontractor) Project Owner, Owner S Point Of Contact Including Telephone Number And Email Address. Services & Deliverables Provided Under The Contract/task Order. Period Of Performance, Including Start And Completion Dates Total Dollar Value Of The Project Ae Cost Estimate Vs. Actual Construction Cost Contract Number Associated With The Project. The Information Provided In Section F Of The Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate Relevant Specialized Experience And Technical Competence. Any Projects Submitted By An Offeror That Exceed The Limit Will Not Be Considered During The Evaluation. The Information Provided In Section G Of The Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate The Prior Experience Of The Prime Firm And Any Key Subcontractors Working Together On The Provided Relevant Projects. The Offeror Must Include Narratives Of How The Firm Addresses Each Of The Following Topics In Section H. Simply Restating This List In Section H Will Not Be Sufficient. The Management Approaches. The Coordination Of Disciplines And Subcontractors Quality Control Procedures, And Familiarity With Va Design Guides/manuals, Master Specifications, And Other Applicable Standards. Capacity: The Evaluation Will Consider The Firm S Ability To Meet The Schedule Of The Overall Project, As Well As The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time. Provide The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines By Providing Current Project Workload, Inclusive Of All Projects Awarded By The Va, Any Federal Agency, And Private Sector, During The Previous Twelve (12) Months Or Any Active Projects At Pcac. Include The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts The Prime Firm Has Been Awarded From Any Source. Offeror Shall Clearly State Their Available Capacity Presenting Workload Percentages For The Key Disciplines And/or Team Members. Also, The Offeror Must Provide The Award Date, Completion Percentages, And Expected Completion Date For The Va Projects Awarded In The Previous Twelve (12) Months Or Active At Pcac. The Information For This Factor Must Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Please Ensure The Capacity Applies Toward The Proposed Team/personnel Provided In The Sf 330. Past Performance: Past Performance Will Be Evaluated On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. Past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (cpars) Database Will Be Reviewed To Evaluate The Projects That Have A Va Cpars Entry. Va Cpars Are Not Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330 Submission. The Contract Number For The Project Must Be Submitted For Each Project Provided In Section F So Cpars Can Be Reviewed In The Database. Please Note We Are Unable To Review Any Cpars From Other Federal Agencies Outside Of The Va. For Any Project That Does Not Have Va Cpars Data Available, A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Is Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330. If The Firm (prime Or Subcontractor) Was Not The Prime Contractor On Any Project Submitted In The Sf330, A Ppq Must Be Submitted Listing Their Specific Role (key Disciplines) As A Subcontractor. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. In The Event That A Firm Does Not Receive A Completed Ppq Requested From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title/contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. The Government May Consider Additional Performance Related Information Regarding The Firm, To Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. If Appropriate, The Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services May Be Evaluated. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Will Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. The Information For This Factor Must Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. For Ppqs, Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document. Completed Ppqs Should Be Incorporated Into The Sf 330. Ppqs Should Not Be Submitted To Vha Pcac Directly. Any Ppqs Will Not Be Counted Towards The Page Limitation For This Submission. However, Any Narratives Provided For Past Performance In Section H Will Be Counted Toward The Page Limit. Knowledge Of Locality: Demonstrate And Describe Experience In The Local Area And The Specific Knowledge Of Certain Local Conditions Or Project Site Features The Experience Provided. This Description May Include (if Applicable): Any Prime Firm Or Subcontractor Experience Within The Visn Or At The Vamc State Or Local Construction Codes, Laws, Or Regulations Climate And Seismic Related Conditions Or Features The Information For This Factor Must Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Note That The Intent Of This Factor Is To Showcase A Firm S Understanding Of The Site And Locality, And Not Where The Firm Is Located, How Far Away The Firm/branch Office Is From The Site, And How They Would Travel To The Site. Information Related To The Firm S Location Shall Instead Be Provided In Section H Under Secondary Selection Criterion Factor 1, Geographic Location. See Below. Experience In Construction Period Services: Experience In Construction Period Services Must Be Demonstrated Via Project Experience. These May Be The Same Projects Identified Above In Factor 1; However, The Firm Shall Clearly Delineate The Types Of Construction Period Services Performed For Each. Refer To The Statement Of Work For Review Timeline Expectations. Project Descriptions Must Include Experience With: Solicitation Support Services, Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period Coordination With Commissioning Requirements Review Of Construction Submittals Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period. Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Cost Estimates. Attendance At Weekly Conference Calls Providing Minutes Of Meetings Between The Ae, Va, And Contractors Pre-final Inspection Site Visits Generation Of Punch-list Reports, And Production Of As-built Documentation. The Firm Shall Provide A Detailed Description Of Projects Worked That Illustrate Experience In These Areas. Projects Must Be Within The Last Ten (10) Years. In Addition, The Firm Must Include A Description Of Experience Addressing Unforeseen Conditions And Emergent Situations, Conducting Situation Evaluations, And Making Midcourse Corrections. Include Description On How The Firm Can Be Proactive Or Responsive In These Situations. The Information For This Factor Must Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Secondary Selection Criterion*: Geographic Location. Location Of The Firm, As Measured By The Driving Distance (miles) Between The Offeror S Principal Business Location And The Tomah Va Medical Center 500 E Veterans Street, Tomah, Wi. 54660. . Determination Of The Mileage Will Be Based On Google Maps (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/). *the Secondary Selection Criterion Is Used As A Tiebreaker, If Necessary, In Ranking The Most Highly Qualified Firms Following The Completion Of Discussions. The Secondary Selection Criterion Will Not Be Applied When Determining A Firm S Sf 330 Submission Highly Qualified Or Not Highly Qualified. 5. Submission Requirements: The Below Information Contains The Instructions And Format That Must Be Followed For The Submission Of The Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications: Submit One (1) Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications To Contract Specialist Johnna Mcgraw At Johnna.mcgraw@va.gov . This Must Include Parts I And Ii And Any Applicable Attachments. The Submission Must Include The Sf 330, Architect-engineer Qualifications (form Is Available Online At Https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms/architectengineer-qualifications). The Sf 330 Submission Is Due By January 10th 2025 At 1pm Est. The Sf 330 Must Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted. The Subject Line Of The Email Must Read: Sf 330 Submission Fire Station Design- Tomah Wi. The Sf 330 Submission Must Not Exceed A Total Of 50 Pages. This Includes Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information. Any Pages Submitted By An Offeror That Exceed The Limit Will Not Be Considered During The Evaluation. Each Page Must Be In Arial Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. Part Ii Of The Sf 330 And Any Cpars Or Ppqs Will Not Count Toward The Page Limitation. A Ppq Obtained For Another Sf 330 Submission May Be Submitted For This Project. However, If Significant Portions Of The Project Have Been Completed Since The Ppq Was Filled Out, A New Ppq Should Be Submitted To Accurately Assess The Project. Firms Must Include The Following Information In Section B Of The Sf 330 Submission: 1) Sam Unique Entity Identifier 2) Tax Id Number 3) Cage Code 4) Primary Point Of Contact S Email Address And Phone Number. All Questions Must Be Submitted To Johnna Mcgraw With The Subject Line Sf 330 Questions Fire Station Design-tomah Wi. The Cutoff For Question Submission Is 1:00 Pm Est On December 16th, 2024. Questions Will Be Answered Through Modification To The Pre-sol Notice Posted To Contract Opportunities At Sam.gov. This Procurement Is A 100% Set-aside For Sdvosb Concerns. Offers Received From Other Than Sdvosbs Will Not Be Considered. Offerors Must Be Certified As Sdvosbs By The U.s. Small Business Administration (sba) And Visible In The Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/) At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award. Failure To Be Certified In The Vetcert Database At These Times Will Result In The Offeror Being Deemed Ineligible For Award. All Joint Ventures Must Be Sba Certified At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award And Must Submit Agreements That Comply With 13 Cfr 128.402 Prior To Contract Award. All Prime Firms Must Meet The Naics Code Requirement Specified In This Notice. The Contracting Officer Will Verify The Naics Code In Vetcert. Failure To Meet The Naics Code Requirement May Result In The Rejection Of The Sf 330 Submission. Sf 330 Submissions Received After The Date And Time Specified Will Not Be Considered. Late Proposal Rules Per Far 15.208 Will Be Followed For Late Submittals. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Not Be Evaluated. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf 330 Submission Package. It Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Contract Opportunities Website At Sam.gov For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submitting Their Sf 330.

Details: It Is Anticipated That A Formal Solicitation Will Be Issued Within 30 Days Of This Pre-solicitation Notice. No Response Is Required For This Notice. pre Solicitation Notice For N66604-23-rfpreq-npt-10-0243 Indefinite Delivery/indefinite Quantity (idiq) Contract For Multi‐ Discipline Architect‐engineer (a‐e) Services In Support Of Projects On Nuwc Facilities At Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport Division (nuwcdivnpt), Newport, Ri. description: All Information Needed For Interested Parties To Submit A Standard Form Sf 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications Is Contained Herein. There Is No Separate Request For Proposals (rfp) Package To Download. background: the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport Division (nuwcdivnpt) Requires A-e Services In Support Of Various Projects At Nuwcdivnpt. This Procurement Will Result In One Single-award Idiq Contract For Multi‐discipline A‐e Services For Planning, Design, Construction, Evaluation Of New Construction, And Renovation Projects. These Services Will Be Procured In Accordance With 40 United States Code (usc) Chapter 11, Selection Of Architects And Engineers, As Implemented By Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36.6. The Idiq Contract Will Be For A Five-year Ordering Period. The Maximum Value For The Contract Term, Including All Awards, Shall Not Exceed $5,000,000. The Guaranteed Minimum For The Contract Ordering Period Is $500 And Will Be Satisfied By Simultaneous Award Of The Initial Task Order With The Basic Contract. Firm‐fixed Price Task Orders Will Be Negotiated At The Task Order Level. In Accordance With Far 15.404-4(c)(4)(i)(b), The Contract Price Or The Estimated Cost And Fee For Production And Delivery Of Designs, Plans, Drawings, And Specifications Shall Not Exceed 6 Percent Of The Estimated Of Construction Of The Public Work Or Construction, Excluding Fees. There Will Be No Minimum Dollar Limits Per Task Order. The Maximum Dollar Limit Per Task Order Is $3,000,000. this Proposed Contract Is Being Solicited As A Small Business Set-aside. The North American Industry Classification System (naics) Code Is 541310, Architectural Engineering Services, And The Small Business Size Standard Is $12,500,000. The Government Seeks The Most Highly Qualified Firm To Perform The Required Services, Based On The Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications, In Accordance With The Selection Criteria Included Herein. comprehensive A‐e Services Are Required For The New Construction, Repair, Replacement, Demolition, Alteration, And/or Improvement Of Facility Projects. Projects May Include Single Or Multiple Disciplines, Such As: Structural, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Architectural, Planning, Environmental, Fire Protection, Cost Estimating, And/or Geotechnical. The Types Of Projects May Include: Building Renovations; Building Additions; Site Work Required To Support New Work; New Construction; Parking Areas; Foundations; Retaining Walls; Failure Investigation Including Destructive And Non‐destructive Testing; Seismic Evaluation And Design; Progressive Collapse Analysis; Blast Resistant Design; Structural Engineering Investigations; Utility Systems Including Sanitary And Storm; Mechanical Services; Electrical Services; Water Systems; Storm Water Management; Surveying; Pavement Design; And Civil Engineering Studies. performance Location(s): newport, Ri requirements: for Complete Details On This Requirement See Attachment 1, “saes.” Specific Types Of A‐e Services That May Be Required Under This Contract Include: facility Planning And Project Development: Services May Include Work Such As The Following: Prepare Master Plans, Project/site Plans For Proposed Facility/infrastructure Projects. Facility Planning May Be Requested For Renovation, Addition, Repair And New Construction Projects. development Of Design‐bid‐ Build (dbb) Packages: Services May Include Preparation Of Drawings And Specifications For Renovation, Addition, Repair Or New Construction Projects. Design Meetings With The Government May Be Required In Order To Agree On Design Solution(s) That Meet The Government’s Project Requirements. development Of Design‐build (db) Request For Proposal (rfp) Packages: Services May Include Working With A Construction Manager As Part Of A Design-build Team To Prepare Drawings And Specifications For Renovation, Additions, Repair Or New Construction Projects. Design Meetings With The Government May Be Required In Order To Agree On Design-build Solution(s) That Meet The Government’s Project Requirements. preparation Of Cost Estimates Using Unit Guidance And Parametric Cost Estimating: Services May Include Preparing Cost Estimates For Renovation, Addition, Repair And/or New Construction Projects Based On Prepared Design Documents. development Of Alternatives And Economic Analysis: Service May Include Providing Alternate Design Solutions And Associated Economic Impacts For Renovation, Addition, Repair Or New Construction Projects. condition Assessment: Services May Include Performing Studies Of Existing Buildings And/or Components Of Buildings To Validate Existing Conditions That May Then Be Used To Inform Future Proposed Design Solutions. Site Visits May Be Required To Document Existing Facility/infrastructure Conditions. field Investigations (including Utility And Geotechnical): Services May Include Conducting Field Surveys/investigations Of Existing Sites, Buildings Or Specific Components Of A Building (i.e Hvac Or Electrical Systems) In Order To Document Current Status Of A Facility’s Infrastructure. The Results Of Any Field Investigations May Then Be Used To Assist With The Preparation Of Design Documents For A Particular Project. surveying And Mapping: Services May Include Surveying And/or Mapping Of Existing Or Proposed Sites For A New Construction Project Or Building Addition. Survey Work May Be Required In Order To Document Existing Site Conditions To Support Site/civil Design Solutions. preparation Of Engineering Evaluations: Services May Include Performing Engineering Calculations To Support Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Or Fire Protection Design Solutions. incorporation Of Sustainable Engineering Design Practices: Services May Include Incorporation Of Design Principles For Renovation, Addition, Repair And/or New Construction Projects To Support Sustainable Design Solutions. consultations: Services May Include Collaborating With Other Specialty Design Professionals To Offer And Propose Design Solutions Required To Respond To Unique Project Requirements. energy Computations; Services May Include Preparation Of Energy Calculations To Verify Proposed Design Solutions Comply With Required Building Codes, Federal, State And/or Local Energy Requirements. soil Borings: Services May Include Conducting Soil Boring Testing In Order To Identify Minimum Design Requirements For New Construction Projects Or Building Additions. obtaining Permits And Regulatory Approvals: Services May Include Submitting Design Documents To Local, State And/or Federal Jurisdictions For Review And Approval Prior To Proceeding With Renovation/construction Work. environmental Investigation And Consultation: Services May Include Providing Design Services Required To Meet Environmental/epa Regulations On Facility/infrastructure Projects And Providing Consultation(s)/collaboration With The Government To Discuss Acceptable Environmental Design Alternatives And Solutions. review Of Contractor Submittals: Services May Include Review Of Project Submittals (such As Product Data Or Product Samples) In Order To Validate Proposed Materials/products Comply With Design Drawings And/or Specifications. field Consultation And Inspection During Construction: Services May Include Responding To Contractor Rfi’s During Construction In Order To Address Design Questions That May Arise During Construction/renovation Projects. commissioning: Services May Include Supporting The Commissioning Process By Attending Commissioning Meetings In Order To Validate Engineered Design Solutions Are Incorporated Into The Project In Accordance With Design Specifications. operation And Maintenance Support Information (omsi): Services May Include Providing The Government With O&m Documentation And Training, Where Applicable, Based On The Final Design Solution And Construction. as‐built Drawing Preparation: Services May Include Updating Design Documents Including Drawings And Specifications To Accurately Reflect Construction Field Changes And Document Final As-built Construction/renovation Projects. functional Analysis Concept Development (facd)/design Charrette/other Design And Construction Related Workshops And Meetings: Services May Require Attendance At Design Meetings To Collaborate With Government Representatives To Consider Design Options And Build Consensus Regarding Preferred Design Solution(s). document Deliverable Requirements: cdrl Number title sub-title cdrl A001 contractor’s Personnel Roster contractor Personnel cdrl A002 hazardous Materials Management Program (hmmp) Plan facility Operations Inventory Hmmp Plan cdrl A003 monthly Status Report monthly Status Report cdrl A004 product Drawings/models And Associated Lists drawing Package cdrl A005 manhour Estimate, Technical Cost Proposal estimates And Proposal cdrl A001 – Contractor’s Personnel Roster within Ten Business Days Of Task Order Issue, The Contractor Shall Submit A List Of All Employees Working On The Project To The Contracting Officer. This List Shall Include Each Employee's Name, And Work Assignment. Changes To The Personnel List Shall Be Submitted At Least Ten Business Days In Advance. In Emergency Situations And Cases Of Adverse Actions Where Ten Business Days’ Notice Is Not Possible, The Contractor Shall Submit The Required Information Regarding The Change In Writing To The Contracting Officer Representative (cor) Not Later Than 24 Hours After The Replacement Employee Is On Board. cdrl A002 – Hazardous Materials Management Program (hmmp) Plan the Contractor Shall Submit A Hazardous Material Management Plan (hmmp) As Addressed In Paragraph 3.2 Of The Saes. cdrl A003 – Monthly Status Report contractor Shall Provide A Monthly Status Report For Each Project In Which The Support Was Provided. The Report Shall Discuss Major Impacts, Issues, And Steps For Remediation Of Issues, Proposals To Improve Operational Efficiencies, Effectiveness, Quality, Or The Customer Experience. cdrl A004 – Product Drawings/models And Associated Lists the Contractor Shall Develop And Deliver Drawings, Specifications, Architect / Engineering Reports, To The Technical Point Of Contact Upon Request. cdrl A005 – Manhour Estimate, Technical Cost Proposal Insert Title a‐e Firms Shall Prepare Cost Estimates Utilizing The Micro‐computer Aided Cost Estimating System (mcaces) Mii Estimating System. Specifications Shall Be Prepared In The Specifications‐kept‐intact (specsintact) Program. Design‐build Rfps Shall Be Prepared Utilizing Design‐build Masters, And Drawings Shall Be Prepared In Autocad (2016 Or Higher) Utilizing The National Computer‐aided Design And Drafting (cadd) Standards Format. Three‐dimension (3‐d) And Bim Modeling May Also Be Required. The Contractor Shall Provide Documents In Pdf Format. Final Documents Shall Be Electronically Signed By The Assigned Architect Or Engineer. All Projects Shall Be Designed In The Modern International Standard Version Of The Metric International System Of Units (si), Unless Specifically Exempted By The Statement Of Work At The Task Order Level. other Special Considerations: as Defined By Paragraph 1‐5 Of United Facilities Criteria (ufc) 3‐ 600‐01, Fire Protection Engineering For Facilities, This Contract Requires The Services Of A Licensed Fire Protection Engineer Or Consultant. asbestos And/or Lead‐based Paint Assessments May Be Required On This Contract To Determine The Presence Of Hazardous Material During Removals/demolition Or At Utility Points Of Connections. Work On And Around Waterfront Structures, Including Under Deck And Underwater, And Work In Confined Spaces May Be Required On This Contract. A‐e Firms Must Be Able To Accept Work That Involves Asbestos, Lead Paint, Poly‐chlorinated Biphenyls (pcb)s, And Other Hazardous Materials, Work On And Under Waterfront Structures, And In Confined Spaces. all Engineering And Design Services Shall Comply With The Most Current Edition Of Facilities Criteria (fc) 1‐300‐09n Design Procedures, And Other Requirements As Indicated On The Whole Building Design Guide (wbdg) Web Site (www.wbdg.org). The Selected A-e Contractor Shall Have Online Access To Web‐based Support Programs Capable Of Creating Auto-cad Documents For Government Review, And Email Via The Internet For Routine Exchange Of Correspondence. The Selected A-e Contractor Shall Submit And Maintain An A‐e Accident Prevention Plan (app) In Accordance With U.s.army Corp Of Engineers (usace) Em 385‐1‐1 For Each Project On This Contract And Activity Hazard Analysis (aha) For Each In‐field Action. Key Personnel, Including Consultants, Must Be U.s. Citizens. a‐e Firms Are Advised That The Selected Firm, Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, And Its Consultants Which Design, Prepare, Or Provide Engineering Services In Support Of Construction Contract Documents Cannot Provide Construction Services For The Same Contract. This Includes Concept Design, Preparation Of Project Programming Documents (dd Form 1391), Facility Siting Studies, Environmental Assessments, Geotechnical Services, Engineering Studies And Services, Design‐build Request For Proposals (rfps), Or Other Activities That Result In Identification Of Project Scope And Cost. The Awarded Contract Will Be Subject To Specific Provisions Addressing The Avoidance Of Organizational Conflicts Of Interest, Including Naval Facilities Acquisition Supplement (nfas) 5252.209‐9300, Organizational Conflicts Of Interest. The Prime Firm For This Contract Will Be Required To Perform Throughout The Contract Term. submission Requirements: a‐e Firms Desiring To Be Considered For This Contract Shall Submit A Completed Sf 330 Package By Email To The Contracting Officer And The Contract Specialist. The Sf 330 Shall Be Typed, At Least 11 Point Times New Roman Or Larger. Part I Shall Not Exceed 100 Single‐sided 8.5 By 11 Inch Pages (the Page Limit Does Not Include Individual Subcontracting Reports (isr)s, Certificates Licenses, Nor Does The Page Limit Include Cover Sheets Or Dividers, Provided That These Do Not Contain Any Substantive Information Submitted In Response To The Synopsis Or Intended To Demonstrate The Qualifications Of The Firm). Part I Pages Shall Be Numbered Sequentially. Introductions Shall Be Included In Sections E And F. A-e Firm Submissions Shall Include Its Dun & Bradstreet (duns), Commercial And Government Entity (cage), And Taxpayer Identification Number (tin) Numbers In Block 30 Of The Sf 330. all Contractors Are Advised That Registration In System For Award Management (sam) Database Is Required Prior To Award Of A Contract. Failure To Register In The Sam Database May Render Your Firm Ineligible For Award. For More Information, Check The Sam Web Site: Https://www.sam.gov. in Accordance With The Federal Acquisition Regulations (far) 36.601‐4(b), The A‐e Firm Must Be A Registered And Licensed Architectural And/or Engineering Firm In Rhode Island To Be Eligible For Award. A-e Firms Shall Provide Proof That The Firm Is Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering, (e.g., State Registration Number, Or A Brief Explanation Of The Firm’s Licensing In Jurisdictions That Do Not Register Firms, Etc.). Failure To Submit The Required Proof Will Result In A Firm’s Elimination From Consideration. firms Who Are Offering As A Joint Venture Should Include With Their Submission A Copy Of The Joint Venture Agreement. Failure To Include The Joint Venture Agreement Will Result In The Firm’s Elimination From Further Evaluation. if An Sf 254/sf 255 Is Submitted For This Solicitation, It Will Not Be Reviewed Or Considered. As Required Above, Provide Verifiable Evidence That Your Firm Is Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering (e.g., State Registration Number). interested Firms Shall Submit Proposals To Both The Contract Specialist And The Contracting Officer At The Email Addresses Listed Below. sf 330 Submissions Are Due No Later Than Xx Xxxxx 2023 At Xx:xx Pm (est). Late Responses Will Be Handled In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulations (far) 52.215‐1. The Points Of Contact For This Acquisition Are Contract Specialist, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, At Xxxxxxxxx@navy.mil And Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Contracting Officer, At Xxxxxxx@navy.mil. (to Be Provided Within Formal Solicitation) the Total Maximum File Size For Email Proposal Submission Is Limited To 10mb. If The Submission Will Exceed 10mb, It Is Acceptable For The Submission To Be Broken Up Into Multiple Emails Or The Firm Should Coordinate With The Identified Government Poc's To Obtain A Dod Safe Request For Submission. Failure Of The Firm To Coordinate A Dod Safe Request For Submission In A Timely Manner, To Allow Sufficient Time For Submission Of The Required Documents Before The Required Response Date, Will Not Be Acceptable Justification For The Government Allowing Or Considering A Late Submission. A Timely Manner Is Defined As Requesting Such Dod Safe Information From The Identified Government Poc's No Later Than 10 Calendar Days In Advance Of The Response Date Of The Synopsis. if The Firm Chooses To Complete Multiple Email Submissions, Emails Shall Clearly Indicate The Number Of Email Submissions The Government Should Expect To Receive And Shall Be Numbered To Indicate Which Email Of The Submission Each Email Received Is (i.e.: Email 1 Of 3; Email 2 Of 3; Email 3 Of 3). inquiries Concerning This Procurement Should Reference The Solicitation Number And Title And Be Forwarded Via Email To The Points Of Contact Identified Above. Questions Pertaining To This Requirement Are Due No Later Than Fourteen (14) Days After Posting Of This Requirement On Sam.gov. list Of Attachments: scope Of Architect-engineer (a-e) Services (saes) (draft) cdrls (draft) selection Criteria: firms Responding To This Synopsis Will Be Evaluated To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms To Perform The Required Services In Accordance With The Published Selection Criteria. failure To Comply With Instructions, Or Provide Complete Information May Affect The Firm’s Evaluation Or Disqualify The Firm From Further Consideration. Evaluation Criteria (1) Through (4) Are Considered Most Important And Are Equal Among Themselves; Criteria (5) Through (6) Are Less Important And Are Equal Among Themselves; Criteria (7) Will Only Be Used As A Tie‐breaker Among Technically Equal Firms. Specific Selection Criteria Include: specialized Experience professional Qualifications And Technical Competence past Performance quality Control program Management And Capacity firm Location volume Of Work criterion 1 —specialized Experience (sf 330, Part I, Section F): firms Will Be Evaluated On Specialized Experience In Performance Of Services Similar To Those Anticipated Under This Contract Through Evaluation Of Experience In: infrastructure/facility Design Utilizing The Following Criteria, Including, But Not Limited To, Unified Facilities Criteria (ufc’s) And Military Standard (milstd); conducting On‐site Design Development Workshops, Charrettes, Functional Analysis, Schematic Design, Or Space Programming, Including Supporting Budgetary Or Parametric Cost Estimating; demonstrated Ability To Design To Project Budget And Schedule; experience Preparing Design‐bid‐build; experience Preparing Design‐build Rfp Packages; And designing Projects In Accordance With Dod, Navy, Or Other Government Agencies’, Or Private Industry Criteria. firms May Be Considered More Favorably Under Criterion 1 By Demonstrating The Following: experience In The Delivery Of Multiple Types Of A‐e Services Identified In The Requirements Above. experience On Multiple Facility Types, Such As Business, Educational, Industrial, Assembly, Health Care, Residential, Storage, Laboratory, And Mixed-use Occupancies, Identified In The Requirements Above. demonstrated Experience Using The Micro Computer Aided Cost Estimating System Second Generation (mii) Cost Estimating Software. demonstrated Experience On Navy Bases Within The Primary Geographic Area Of The Contract. demonstrated Experience Designing Modifications To Existing Structures And Developing Construction Phasing While Associated Facilities Are Required To Remain In Service. demonstrated Experience Specific To Navy Facility Projects, Illustrating The Capability Of The A‐e Firm And Individual Design Team Members (a‐e Staff, Key Personnel, Consultants) To Work Within The Navy Project Planning Process Including: dd Form 1391 Development In The Navy’s Electronic Procurement Generator (epg), dd Form 1391 Validation Procedures Including Cost Validation. demonstrated Understanding Of Procedures And Timely Submission Of Base Access Documents In Adherence With Security, Safety, Environmental, And Accident Prevention Regulations In Order To Support A‐e Activities And Maintain Project Schedules. experience Of A‐e Firm And Individual Design Team Members (a‐e Staff, Key Personnel, Sub‐ Consultants) With Facilities Located In Historic Areas That Will Require Consultation With State Historic Preservation Officer (shpo) Throughout The Design Process. criterion 1 Submission Requirements: provide Up To A Maximum Of Ten (10) Projects Completed (project Completion To Be Defined As Receiving Final Design Acceptance From Client) Within The Past Seven (7) Years Immediately Preceding The Date Of Issuance Of This Notice That Best Demonstrate Specialized Experience Of The Proposed Team In The Areas Outlined Above. Sufficient Information To Determine The Date Of Completion Of The Project Must Be Included In The Project Description Or The Project Will Not Be Considered. If More Than The Maximum Number Of Projects Is Submitted, The Government Will Only Evaluate Projects Up To The Maximum Number Authorized In The Order Submitted. all Projects Provided In The Sf 330 Must Be Completed By The Actual Office/branch/regional Office/ Individual Team Member Proposed To Manage And Perform Work Under This Contract. Projects Not Meeting This Requirement Will Be Excluded From Consideration In The Evaluation. To Enable Verification, Firms Should Include The Duns Number Along With Each Firm Name In The Sf 330 Part I, Section F, Block 25, “firm Name.” Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification Number In Block 21. Include An E‐ Mail Address And Phone Number For The Point Of Contact In Block 23(c). In Block 24, Include In The Project Description The Contract Period Of Performance, Award Contract Value, Current Contract Value, And A Summary Of The Work Performed That Demonstrates Relevance To Specialized Experience As Outlined Above. For Projects Performed As A Sub-contractor Or A Joint Venture Involving Different Partners, Specifically Indicate The Value Of The Work Performed As A Subcontractor Or By Those Firms Proposed For This Contract, And Identify The Specific Roles And Responsibilities Performed As A Sub-contractor Or By Those Firms On The Project Rather Than The Work Performed On The Project As A Whole. If The Project Description Does Not Clearly Delineate The Work Performed By The Entity/entities Offering/teaming On This Contract, The Firm Will Be Eliminated From Award Consideration. note: If The Firm Is A Joint Venture, Projects Performed By The Joint Venture Should Be Submitted; However, If There Are No Projects Performed By The Joint Venture, Projects Must Be Submitted For Each Joint Venture Partner, Not To Exceed A Total Of Ten (10) Projects. Firms Failing To Provide Projects From All Joint Venture Partners Will Be Considered To Have Not Met The Requirements Of The Criterion. projects Shall Be Submitted On The Sf 330 At Part I, Section F And Shall Be Completed Projects. Projects Not Completed Will Be Excluded From Evaluation Consideration. For Submittal Purposes, A Task Order On An Idiq Contract Is Considered A Project, As Is A Stand‐alone Contract Award. Do Not Submit An Idiq Contract As An Example Project. Instead, List Relevant Task Orders Or Stand‐alone Contract Awards That Fit Within The Definition Above. The Government Will Not Evaluate Information Provided For An Idiq Contract. Examples Of Project Work Submitted That Do Not Conform To This Requirement Will Not Be Evaluated. all Information For Criterion 1 Shall Be Submitted In The Sf 330, Part I, Section F. The Government Will Not Consider Information Submitted In Addition To Part I, Section F In The Evaluation Of Criterion 1. criterion 2—professional Qualifications And Technical Competence (sf 330, Part I, Sections E & G): firms Will Be Evaluated On Professional Qualifications, Competence, And Experience Of The Proposed Key Personnel In Providing Services To Accomplish The Tasks Required Under This Contract, Including Participation In Example Projects In The Sf 330, Part I, Section G. Key Personnel Are Individuals Who Will Have Major Contract Or Project Management Responsibilities And/or Will Provide Unusual Or Unique Expertise. Specific Disciplines That Must Be Included In Key Personnel Are: project Manager(s) senior Architect senior Civil Engineer senior Structural Engineer senior Mechanical Engineer senior Electrical Engineer senior Quality Control Manager senior Fire Protection Engineer (a Licensed Fire Protection Engineer Is Required) key Personnel, Including Consultants, Shall Be U.s. Citizens. submissions Must Demonstrate Key Personnel Relevant Experience, Formal Education (e.g. Bachelor’s Or Master’s Degrees), And Relevant Professional Development Or Professional Certifications. criteria 2 Submission Requirements: sf 330, Part I, Section E – Provide Resumes For All Proposed Key Personnel That Illustrate Experience In The Type Of Work Proposed Under This Contract. Resumes Are Limited To Three Pages And Should Indicate: Professional Registration, Certification, Licensure And/or Accreditation In Appropriate Disciplines; Cite Recent (within The Past 10 Years) Project‐specific Experience In Work Relevant To The Services Required Under This Contract; And Indicate Proposed Role In This Contract. Indicate Participation Of Key Personnel In Example Projects In The Sf 330, Part I, Section G. criterion 3—past Performance (sf 330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On Past Performance With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Work Quality, Compliance With Schedules, Cost Control, And Stakeholder/customer Satisfaction. evaluating Past Performance And Experience Will Include Information Provided In The Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (cpars) / Architect-engineer Contract Administration Support System (acass) For Criterion 1 Projects And May Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Other Information Available To The Government Including Contacts With Points Of Contact In Other Criteria. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. criteria 3 Submission Requirements: submit A Completed Cpars/acass Evaluation For Each Project Under Criterion 1. If Cpars Or Acass Evaluations Are Not Available For The Projects Identified Under Criterion 1, Then The Firm Shall Provide A Point Of Contact Reference From The Requiring Organization Familiar With The Project Who Can Confirm The Quality Of The Offeror’s Work On The Project. Those References Shall Include Contract/task Order Number, Project Title, Point Of Contact Name, Telephone Numbers, And Email Addresses For The Reference. firms May Provide Any Information On Problems Encountered And The Corrective Actions Taken On Projects Submitted Under Criterion 1—specialized Experience. Firms May Also Address Any Adverse Past Performance Issues. Information Shall Not Exceed Two Double‐sided Pages (or Four Single‐sided Pages) In Total. awards, Letters Of Commendation, Certificates Of Appreciation, Etc. Shall Not Be Submitted And Will Not Be Considered In The Evaluation. criterion 4—quality Control Program (sf 330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On The Strength Of The Quality Control Program Proposed By The Firm To Ensure Quality Products And Services Under This Contract, And Means Of Ensuring Quality Services From Their Consultants/subcontractors. criteria 4 Submission Requirements: describe The Quality Control Program That Will Be Utilized For All Deliverables Of This Contract And The Management Approach For Quality Control Processes And Procedures. The Description Shall: describe Specific Quality Control Processes And Procedures Proposed For This Contract To Achieve Technical Accuracy Of And Assurance Of Overall Coordination Of Plans And Specifications, And Engineering And Design Services. provide A Quality Control Process Chart Showing The Inter‐relationship Of The Management And Team Components. identify The Key Personnel (submitted Under Criterion 2—professional Qualifications And Technical Competence) Responsible For The Quality Control Program And A Description Of Their Roles And Responsibilities. describe How The Firm’s Quality Control Program Extends To Management Of Sub-contractors. explain The Quality Control Program Including An Example Of How The Plan Has Worked For One Of The Projects Submitted As Part Of Sf 330, Section F Or How The Plan Will Work If It Has Not Been Used Previously. criterion 5—program Management And Capacity (sf 330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On The Firm’s Ability To Plan For And Manage Work Under The Contract And The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. criteria 5 Submission Requirements: provide An Organizational Chart For The Team And Discuss The Management Plan For This Contract And Personnel Roles In The Organization. Describe The Ability Of The Firm To Manage, Coordinate And Work Effectively With Team Members, Both Internal Staff, Sub-contractors And Consultants. Discuss The History Of Working Relationships With Team Members, Including Joint Venture Partners Where Applicable. describe The Firm’s Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period. Describe The Workload/availability Of The Key Personnel During The Anticipated Contract Performance Period And The Ability Of The Firm To Provide Qualified Backup Staffing For Key Personnel To Ensure Continuity Of Services. General Statements Of Availability/capacity May Be Considered Less Favorably. describe The Firm’s Ability To Sustain The Loss Of Key Personnel While Accomplishing Work Within Required Time Limits, To Ensure Continuity Of Services And Ability To Meet Surges In Unexpected Project Demands And Ability To Adhere To Schedules And Budgets. criterion 6—firm Location (sf 330, Part I, Section H) firms Will Be Evaluated On The Locations Of Their Office Or Offices That Will Be Performing The Work Under This Contract And Demonstrated Knowledge Of The General Geographic Areas In Which Projects Could Be Located. Evaluation Of Firms Will Include Consideration Of Their Location Within The General Geographic Area Of The Anticipated Projects (primarily At Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport Division, Newport, Ri). criteria 6 Submission Requirements: indicate Location Of The Office(s) That Will Be Performing The Work, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices, And Offices Of Team Members. provide A Narrative Describing The Team’s Knowledge And Previous Experience Of The Primary Geographic Areas To Be Covered By This Contract. provide A Narrative To Describe The Team’s Ability To Provide Timely Response To Requests For On‐site Support. Provide Timelines And Examples Of The Team’s Success In Providing This Response. Include Both Primary And Sub‐contractor Support As Required. Teams With A Demonstrated History Of Providing Timely Support May Be Considered More Favorably. criterion 7—volume Of Work (sf 330, Part 1, Section H) (tie-breaker) in The Event Of A Tie Among Equally Rated Firms, Those Firms Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With Dod Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (dfars) Procedures, Guidance And Information (pgi) 236.602‐1, From Data Extracted From The Federal Procurement Data System (fpds). Firms Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of Work Previously Awarded To The Firm By Dod Within The Past Twelve (12) Months With The Objective Of Effecting An Equitable Distribution Of Contracts Among Qualified A‐e Firms Including Small, Disadvantaged Business Firms, And Firms That Have Not Had Prior Dod A‐e Contracts. criterion 7 Submission Requirements: firms Shall Not Submit Data For This Factor.

Details: Sources Sought Notice sources Sought Notice page 12 Of 12 sources Sought Notice *= Required Field sources Sought Notice page 1 Of 12 this Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal. The Government Will Not Pay Nor Reimburse Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. the Department Of Veterans Affairs Is Seeking A Qualified Architect-engineering (ae) Firm To Provide Schematics, Design Development, Construction Documents, Technical Specifications, Construction Period Services, Site Visits, Cost Estimates, As-built Documentation, And All Other Related Information For Project 528a5-24-504, Project Upgrade Buildings 7&8 Electric Room At The Canandaigua Vamc At 400 Fort Hill Ave, Canandaigua Ny 14424. This Project Will Expand The Existing Electrical Rooms On The Ground Floor Of Building 7 And 8, Into Adjacent Spaces And Replace Electrical Components. this Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act As Implemented In Far Subpart 36.6. Applicable Naics Code Is 541330 And Small Business Size Standard Of $25.5 Million. Magnitude Of Construction Is Between $5,000,000.00 And $10,000,000.00. This Is A 100% Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Set Aside. The Anticipated Award Date Of The Proposed A-e Contract Is On Or Before May 20th, 2025 . Potential Contractors Must Be Registered In Sam (www.sam.gov ) And Are Visible/verified/certified As Sdvosb (or Vosb) In Veterans Small Business Certification (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/ ) At Time Of Submission Of Their Qualifications In Order To Be Considered For An Award. in Order To Assure Compliance With Vaar Clauses, 852.219-75 Va Notice Of Limitations On Subcontracting Certificate Of Compliance For Services And Construction (nov 2022) And 852.219-73 Va Notice To Total Set-aside For Verified Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses (nov 2022), All Firms Submitting A Sf 330 For This Notice Are Required To Indicate What Percentage Of The Cost Of Contract Performance Will Be Expended On The Concerns Employees And In Which Discipline(s) And Percentage Of Cost Of Contract Performance To Be Expended (and In What Disciplines) By Any Other Consultant/subcontractor Or Otherwise Used Small Or Large Business Entity(s). Any Consultant/subcontractor Or Otherwise Business Entity(s) Used Must Be Identified By Name, Office Location And Size/type Of Business (i.e., Sdvosb, Vosb, 8(a), Small, Large, Etc.). Failure To Provide This Information Will Deem The Firm S Sf 330 Submittal As Nonresponsive And Preclude Further Evaluation all A/e Firms Are Advised That In Accordance With Vaar 836.606-71 The Total Cost Of The Production And Delivery Of Designs, Plans, Drawings And Specifications Shall Not Exceed Six (6) Percent Of The Estimate Cost Of Construction. Other A-e Fees Are Not Included In The Six (6) Percent. Additionally, Far Clause 52.236-22 (c) - Design Within Funding Limitation, Will Be Applicable To This Procurement Action. exsisting Conditions: the Canandaigua Vamc Is Located At 400 Fort Hill Avenue, Canandaigua, Ny 14424. Building 7 And 8 Are Two Of The Main Campus Structures And Contains Sensitive Programming Including Clc S With In-patient Care. The Existing Electrical Rooms Are Insufficient In Size And Does Not Meet Current Codes/standards As Set By The Va. The Adjacent Spaces To These Electrical Rooms Consist Of Available Space For Expansion. All Electrical Equipment Shall Be Replaced Unless Otherwise Directed By The Va And All Building Services Shall Placed On Emergency Power. All Proposed Equipment Shall Meet Current Va Standards And Codes. scope Of Service Required 1. Provide Investigative, Schematic, And Design Development Services, Production Of Construction Documents, Working Drawings, Specifications, And Cost Estimates, And Perform Construction Administration Including Shop Drawing And Submittal Review As Required To Complete The Work And As Per The Architect/engineer (a/e) Required Deliverables. The A/e Firm Shall Analyze The Existing Conditions And Working With The Medical Center Staff Develop Various Proposals To Meet The Project Intent. Develop Accepted Proposal Into A Final Design And Cost Estimate To Best Suit The Needs And Constraints Of The Government, While Incorporating Vamc Canandaigua Engineering Services, Va Network 2, Or Any Other Government Comments. 2. Provide For Necessary Design For Utility Connections, Alternative Power, Phasing, And Support For Building Operations Through Construction With Minimal Interruptions. 3. Perform Load Test On Existing Generator And Emergency Power System To Confirm Existing Supply Will Support Additional Loads. 4. Provide An Independent Analysis To Locate Any Underground Or Hidden Utilities For Inclusion In The Design If Applicable, To Confirm Viability Of Planned Excavations Or Demolitions Of To Support Design Objectives. Such Analysis May Include Ground Penetrating Radar, Review Of Existing Va Documentation Or Other Viable Options To Verify These Utilities. 5. Attend All Design Review Meetings And Make All Necessary Site Visits During Design Phases To Gather Information Necessary From The Existing Site Conditions, Building Plans, Utility Plans, Etc. To Provide A Complete Assessment Of The Proposed Work. The Proposal Shall Include An Identified Number Of Visits. The Va Shall Provide Access To Hardcopy/electronic Files. The A/e Firm Shall Perform All Searches Of The Files For Any Required Reference Materials To Support Design Efforts. Limited Digital Drawings Are Available. 6. Attend Pre-bid Job Walk And Provide All Engineering Responses To Questions Asked By Potential Bidders And Issue Addendum When Necessary. 7. All Work Shall Be In Accordance With All Applicable Codes In The Department Of Veteran Affairs (va) Design Manuals And Va Publications (master Construction Specifications, Construction Standards, National Fire Protection Association (nfpa), Underwriters Laboratory, International Building Code Ibc, National Electric Code (nec), Building Codes And Standards, And Va Information Security Handbook 6500.6, Etc.) 8. All Work Containing Hazardous Materials Shall Be In Accordance With New York State Code Rule 56 Regarding Asbestos And Other Hazardous Materials, Ahera Regulations 40 Cfr Part 763.86, 763,87, And Osha 1926.1101(k)(1). 9. All Submissions Shall Include Physical And Digital Submissions Of Drawings And Specifications. 10. All Drawings Shall Be Submitted At Architectural E1 (30 X 42 ) For Full Sized Sets And Architectural C (18 X 24 ) For Half Sized Sets. All Sets Shall Be Bound. 11. All Cad Submissions Shall Be Provided In Autocad 2017 Unless Discussed Otherwise. Revit Models Shall Also Be Submitted In Addition To Cad Documents If Created. 12. The Autodesk Build Construction Management Platform (autodesk Construction Cloud Acc) Will Be Used For Information Sharing And Project Management Through The Design And Construction Phases. This Software Is Provided By The Va At No Additional Cost To The A/e. a. Platform Training Will Be Provided By The Va And Is Required By All Parties To Access. b. The A/e Shall, Upon Award, Provide A Comprehensive List Of Project Staff Who Will Need Access To Acc Including: i. Full Name ii. Company Name iii. Email Address iv. Role/position On The Project c. Completion Certificates Of Training By All Members Of The Team Shall Be Provided To The Cor Within 12 Calendar Days. d. Additional Members Can Be Added At Any Time Upon Written Request To The Cor. e. Acc Shall Be Used For All Digital Submissions, Official Project Correspondence, Submittals, Rfis, Schedules, Actionable Tasks, Photos, Surveys, Reports, Inspections, Etc. 13. Provide Design, Construction, And Post-construction Services As Listed Below. a Full Scope Of Services Including The Deliverables Will Be Included In The Formal Solicitation After A Review Of The Sf330s. Location canandaigua Vamc. 400 Fort Hill Avenue Canandaigua, Ny 14424 cost Range estimated Construction Cost Range: Between $5,000,000 And $10,000,000. type Of Contract Contemplated the Department Of Veterans Affairs Is Contemplating Awarding A Firm Fixed Price Contract. design Completion Period: The Department Of Veterans Affairs Requires Design And Contract Support Services. The A/e Shall Deliver 100% Bid Documents In 220 Calendar Days From The Notice To Proceed (ntp). selection Criteria Descriptions the Selection Criteria Descriptions Are Provided Below. professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services. offerors Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of The Qualifications, Competence And Experience Of The Key Personnel And Technical Team Proposed To Accomplish This Work. Key Personnel Are Individuals Who Will Have Major Contract Or Project Management Responsibilities And/or Will Provide Unusual Or Unique Expertise. Provide A Balanced Licensed And Or Certified Workforce In The Following Disciplines Architecture, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, Interior Design, Environmental Services And Fire Protection Engineering As Needed. The Designers Of Record Shall Perform And Direct The Design Within Their Respective Discipline And Shall Sign And Seal The Drawings. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. submission Requirements: Provide Resumes For All Proposed Key Personnel. Resumes Are Limited To One Page Each And Should Cite Project Specific Experience And Indicate Proposed Role In This Contract. Provide Professional Registration, Certification, Licensure And/or Accreditation. Indicate Participation Of Key Personnel In Example Projects In The Sf-330 Part 1 Section G. (2) Specialized Experience And Technical Competence specialized Experience And Technical Competence Required For This Specific Project, Including, Where Appropriate, Experience In Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials. offerors Will Be Evaluated On Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Performance Of Services Similar To Those Anticipated Under This Contract With Regard To: experience With Design Of Inpatient Medical Care Facilities. experience With Design Of Multifunctional Offices. experience With Specialized Hvac And Electrical Distribution Systems Design For Healthcare Facilities; experience In Providing Post Construction Award Services (shop Drawing Review, As-built Drawing And Quality Assurance Plan (qap) Preparation, Construction Inspection Services, And Operating And Maintenance Manuals). experience With Government Designs And Construction. experience With Extensive Site Survey Skills submission Requirements: Provide Up To Five (5) Projects Completed Or Substantially Completed Within The Past Five (5) Years That Best Illustrate Specialized Experience Of The Proposed Team In The Areas Outlined Above And The Scope Of Work Of The Project. Example Projects Shall Note Project S Square Footage. All Projects Provided In The Sf-330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/regional Office/individual Team Member Actually Proposed To Manage And/or Perform Work Under This Contract. To Enable Verification, Firms Should Include The Duns Number Along With Each Firm Name In The Sf-330 Part 1, Section F Item 25 Firms From Section C Involved In This Project, Block (1). Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification Number In Block 21. Include An E-mail Address, And Phone Number For The Point Of Contact In Block 23(c). Include In The Project Description The Contract Period Of Performance, Award Contract Value, Current Contract Value, A Summary Of The Work Performed That Demonstrates Relevance To Specialized Experience As Outlined Above. If The Contractor Served As A Subcontractor On A Project, Indicate The Value Of The Work They Provided Towards The Performance Of The Overall Project. If A Project Was Performed By A Joint Venture, And Not All Joint Venture Partners Are On The Team Proposed For This Contract, The Offeror/team Should Specifically Address The Work Performed By The Joint Venture Partner Offering/teaming On This Contract. Likewise, If The Offeror/team Member Worked As A Subcontractor On A Project, The Description Should Clearly Describe The Work Actually Performed By The Offeror/team Member And The Roles And Responsibilities Of Each On The Project, Rather Than The Work Performed On The Project As A Whole. If The Project Description Does Not Clearly Delineate The Work Performed By The Entity/entities Offering/teaming On This Contract, The Project Could Be Eliminated From Consideration. note: If The Offeror Is A Joint Venture, Information Should Be Submitted As A Joint Venture; However, If There Is No Information For The Joint Venture, Information Should Be Submitted For Either Joint Venture Partner, Not To Exceed A Total Of Five (5) Projects For This Criterion. Projects Shall Be Submitted On The Sf-330. For Submittal Purposes, A Task Order On An Idiq Contract Is Considered A Project, As Is A Stand-alone Contract Award. Do Not List An Idiq Contract As An Example Of A Completed Project. Instead, List Relevant Completed Task Orders Or Stand-alone Contract Awards That Fit Within The Definition Above. Examples Of Project Work Submitted That Do Not Conform To This Requirement Will Not Be Evaluated. failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Rated Lower. all Information For Criterion 1 Should Be Submitted In Part 1, Section F Of The Sf-330. The Government Will Not Consider Information Submitted In Addition To Part 1, Section F In Evaluating Criterion 1. (3) Capacity this Factor Evaluates The Ability Of The Firm, Given Their Current Projected Workload And The Availability Of Their Key Personnel, To Accomplish The Possible Myriad Of Design Projects In The Required Time. submission Requirements: Describe The Firm S Ability To Concurrently Perform And Manage Multiple Projects In Different Locations To Meet Aggressive Schedules, Multiple Disciplines, And Control Costs And The Firm S Capacity To Accomplish Multiple Projects Simultaneously. the General Workload And Staffing Capacity Of The Design Office Will Be Evaluated. list Current Projects With A Design Fee Of Greater Than $20,000 Being Designed In The Firms Office. ii. Indicate The Firms Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Sub-consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period; iii. Describe Experience In Successfully Delivering Projects Per Performance Schedule, Providing Timely Construction Support, And Successfully Completing Multiple Projects With Similar Delivery Dates (4) Past Performance: Visn2 Will Evaluate Past Performance On Recent And Relevant Contracts With Government Agencies (emphasis On Va Work) And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, Compliance With Performance Schedules And A Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm. i. Recent Is Defined As Performance Occurring Within Five (5) Years Of The Date Of This Sources Sought, Except Those Ongoing Projects Must Have Begun No Less Than One (1) Year Prior To The Issuance Of This Sources Sought. ii. Relevancy Is Defined As Performance Of Work On Projects That Are Similar In Scope Within A Va Hospital Setting In Relation To The Type Of Projects Anticipated Under The Resultant Contracts. respondents With No Previous Past Performance Shall State This When Addressing The Selection Criteria. Where There Is No Record Of Past Performance, The Proposal Will Be Evaluated Neither Favorably Nor Unfavorably. Superior Performance Ratings On Relevant Projects May Be Considered More Favorably In The Evaluation. submission Requirements: Submit A Completed Cpars/acass Evaluation For Each Project Under Criterion 1. If There Is Not A Completed Cpars/acass Evaluation, The Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Included In This Notice Is Provided For The Offeror Or Its Team Members To Submit To The Client For Each Project The Offeror Includes Under Criterion 1. An Offeror Shall Not Submit A Ppq When A Completed Cpars/acass Is Available. If A Cpars/acass Evaluation Is Not Available, Ensure Correct Phone Numbers And Email Addresses Are Provided For The Client Point Of Contact. Completed Ppqs Should Be Submitted With Your Sf-330. If The Offeror Is Unable To Obtain A Completed Ppq From A Client For A Project(s) Before The Response Date Set Forth In This Notice, Offerors Should Complete And Submit With Their Responses The First Page Of The Ppq (attachment), Which Will Provide Contract And Client Information For The Respective Project(s). Offerors May Submit A Ppq Previously Submitted Under A Different Notice/rfp (legible Copies Are Acceptable) As Long As It Is On The Same Form As Posted With This Synopsis. Offerors Should Follow Up With Clients/references To Ensure Timely Submittal Of Questionnaires. If Requested By The Client, Questionnaires May Be Submitted Directly To The Government's Point Of Contact, Network Contracting Office 2 Attn: Amanda Baumler Via Email At Amanda.baumler@va.gov Prior To The Response Date. Offerors Shall Not Incorporate By Reference Into Their Response Ppqs Or Cpars Previously Submitted In Response To Other A/e Services Procurements. However, This Does Not Preclude The Government From Utilizing Previously Submitted Ppq Information In The Past Performance Evaluation. (5) Location: Location In The General Geographical Area Of The Project And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Project; Provided, That Application Of This Criterion Leaves An Appropriate Number Of Qualified Firms, Given The Nature And Size Of The Project iv. To Be Rated Acceptable For This Evaluation Factor, The A/e Firm Must Be Within 450 Miles From The Prime Contractor S Main Office Or Official Satellite Office To The Canandaigua Vamc At 400 Fort Hills Avenue. Canandaigua, Ny 14424. v. This Distance Is Determined According To Http://maps.google.com/ vi. This Factor Evaluates The Distance The Ae Firm's Design Office Or Official Satellite Office(s) From The Location Of Work (va Medical Center). Please Provide The Address (es) And Distance Of Your Closest Office To The Address Listed In Iv. Above. submission Requirements: Indicate Firms/teams Location, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices And Any Subconsultants Offices And Demonstrate How This Will Be Advantageous To The Government. (6) Veteran Owned: The Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors. (7) Construction Period Services: Experience In Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work, And Cost Estimates Shall Be Included As An Evaluation Criterion When Construction Period Services Is Included In The Statement Of Work For A-e Services. (8) Experience Specific Experience And Qualifications Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. submission Requirements: Offerors Shall Submit Evidence Of Individuals Experience And Qualifications In Their Respective Fields. Additionally, Documentation Must Be Provided To Show These Individuals Have Worked Together As A Team On Previous Projects And Their Role. (completing Sections E, F, And G, On The Sf-330 Meets The Documentation Requirement). Furthermore, Offerors Shall Describe The Ability Of The Firm To Manage, Coordinate And Work Effectively With Team Members, Both Internal Staff And Consultants. Discuss The History Of Working Relationships With Team Members, Including Joint Venture Partners Where Applicable. (9) Reputation Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. submission Requirements: Offerors Shall Provide Documentation (awards, Certificates, Publications, Commendations From Within The Community) As Evidence Of Reputation And Standing Of Its Firm. (10) - Claims - Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services. Offerors With Substantiated Claims Against The Firm As A Result Of Improper Architectural And Engineering Services Provided In The Last Three (3) Years. submission Requirements: Records And Any Other Documentation Of Substantiated Claims Highlighting Improper Or Incomplete Architectural Engineering Services Against The Firm Within The Last Three (3) Years. The Sf-330 Shall Contain A Statement Affirming That There Are No Records Of Significant Claims Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services. please Note: The Ae Evaluation Board Must Be Provided With Complete And Accurate Information For All Ten (10) Evaluation Factors Above In Order To Rank As Qualified And Eligible Firms. Therefore, The Ae Firm Must Expand Upon, As It Deems Necessary, On Any Evaluation Factor Not Well Demonstrated Or Addressed With Part 1a To Part Ig And Part Ii Of The Sf330. The Ae Firm Shall Use Part Ih And/or Use Additional Sheets To Supplement/address All Evaluation Factors To Clearly Demonstrate Its Qualifications. evaluation Scoring evaluation Factors 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 And 10 Will Be Evaluated Using The Following Adjectival Ratings As Follows: outstanding: Proposal Meets Requirements And Indicates An Exceptional Approach And Understanding Of The Requirements. Strengths Far Outweigh Any Weaknesses. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is Very Low. good: Proposal Meets Requirements And Indicates A Thorough Approach And Understanding Of The Requirements. Proposal Contains Strengths Which Outweigh Any Weaknesses. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is Low. acceptable: Proposal Meets Requirements And Indicates An Adequate Approach And Understanding Of The Requirements. Strengths And Weaknesses Are Offsetting Or Will Have Little Or No Impact On Contract Performance. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is Moderate. marginal: Proposal Does Not Clearly Meet Requirements And Has Not Demonstrated An Adequate Approach And Understanding Of The Requirements. The Proposal Has One Or More Weaknesses Which Are Not Offset By Strengths. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is High. unacceptable: Proposal Does Not Meet Requirements And Contains One Or More Deficiencies. Proposal Is Not Awardable. The Firm S Proposal Demonstrates A Misunderstanding Of The Requirement And The Approach Fails To Meet Performance Standards. The Firm S Proposal Has Major Omissions And Inadequate Details To Assure Evaluators That The Offeror Has An Understanding Of Requirement. the Ratings Identified Below Were Used In The Evaluation Of Past Performance (criterion 4): substantial Confidence: Based On The Offeror S Recent/relevant Performance Record, The Government Has A High Expectation That The Offeror Will Successfully Perform The Required Effort. No Doubt Exists Based On The Offeror S Past Performance That They Can Satisfy The Requirements Of The Contract. satisfactory Confidence: Based On The Offeror S Recent/relevant Performance Record, The Government Has A Reasonable Expectation That The Offeror Will Successfully Perform The Required Effort. Little Doubt Exists Based On The Offeror S Past Performance That They Could Satisfy The Requirements Of The Contract. unknown Confidence (neutral): No Recent/relevant Performance Record Is Available Or The Offeror S Performance Record Is So Sparse That No Meaningful Confidence Assessment Rating Can Be Reasonably Assigned. limited Confidence: Based On The Offeror S Recent/relevant Performance Record, The Government Has Little Expectation That The Offeror Will Be Able To Successfully Perform The Required Effort. Some Doubt Exists Based On Past Performance That They Could Satisfy The Terms And Conditions Of The Contract. no Confidence: Based On The Offeror S Recent/relevant Performance Record, The Government Has Little Expectations That The Offeror Will Be Able To Successfully Perform The Required Effort. Significant Doubt Exists Based On The Offeror S Past Performance That They Can Satisfy The Requirements Of The Contract. limitations 852.219-73 Va Notice To Total Set-aside For Verified Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses (nov 2022) (a) Definition. For The Department Of Veterans Affairs, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Concern Or Sdvosb : (1) Means A Small Business Concern - (i) Not Less Than 51 Percent Of Which Is Owned By One Or More Service-disabled Veterans Or, In The Case Of Any Publicly Owned Business, Not Less Than 51 Percent Of The Stock Of Which Is Owned By One Or More Service-disabled Veterans Or Eligible Surviving Spouses (see Vaar802.101, Surviving Spouse Definition); (ii) The Management And Daily Business Operations Of Which Are Controlled By One Or More Service-disabled Veterans (or Eligible Surviving Spouses) Or, In The Case Of A Service-disabled Veteran With Permanent And Severe Disability, The Spouse Or Permanent Caregiver Of Such Veteran; (iii) The Business Meets Federal Small Business Size Standards For The Applicable North American Industry Classification System (naics) Code Identified In The Solicitation Document; (iv) The Business Has Been Verified For Ownership And Control Pursuant To 38 Cfr Part 74 And Is Listed In Va's Vendor Information Pages (vip) Database At Https://www.vetbiz.va.gov/vip/; And (v) The Business Will Comply With Vaar Subpart 819.70 And Small Business Administration (sba) Regulations Regarding Small Business Size And Government Contracting Programs At 13 Cfr Parts 121 And 125, Provided That Any Reference Therein To A Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Concern Or Sdvo Sbc, Is To Be Construed To Apply To A Va Verified And Vip-listed Sdvosb, Unless Otherwise Stated In This Clause. (2) The Term Service-disabled Veteran Means A Veteran, As Defined In 38 U.s.c. 101(2), With A Disability That Is Service-connected, As Defined In 38 U.s.c. 101(16). (3) The Term Small Business Concern Has The Meaning Given That Term Under Section 3 Of The Small Business Act (15 U.s.c. 632). (4) The Term Small Business Concern Owned And Controlled By Veterans With Service-connected Disabilities Has The Meaning Given The Term Small Business Concern Owned And Controlled By Service-disabled Veterans Under Section 3(q)(2) Of The Small Business Act (15 U.s.c. 632(q)(2)), Except That For A Va Contract The Firm Must Be Listed In The Vip Database (see Paragraph (a)(1)(iv) Of This Clause). (b) General. (1) Offers Are Solicited Only From Vip-listed Sdvosbs. Offers Received From Entities That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs At The Time Of Offer Shall Not Be Considered. (2) Any Award Resulting From This Solicitation Shall Be Made To A Vip-listed Sdvosb Who Is Eligible At The Time Of Submission Of Offer(s) And At The Time Of Award. (3) The Requirements In This Clause Apply To Any Contract, Order Or Subcontract Where The Firm Receives A Benefit Or Preference From Its Designation As An Sdvosb, Including Set-asides, Sole Source Awards, And Evaluation Preferences. (c) Representation. Pursuant To 38 U.s.c. 8127(e), Only Vip-listed Sdvosbs Are Considered Eligible To Receive Award Of A Resulting Contract. By Submitting An Offer, The Prospective Contractor Represents That It Is An Eligible Sdvosb As Defined In This Clause, 38 Cfr Part 74, And Vaar Subpart 819.70. (d) Agreement. When Awarded A Contract Action, Including Orders Under Multiple-award Contracts, An Sdvosb Agrees That In The Performance Of The Contract, The Sdvosb Shall Comply With Requirements In Vaar Subpart 819.70 And Sba Regulations On Small Business Size And Government Contracting Programs At 13 Cfr Part 121 And Part 125, Including The Non-manufacturer Rule And Limitations On Subcontracting Requirements In 13 Cfr 121.406(b) And 13 Cfr 125.6. Unless Otherwise Stated In This Clause, A Requirement In 13 Cfr Parts 121 And 125 That Applies To An Sdvo Sbc, Is To Be Construed To Also Apply To A Vip-listed Sdvosb. For The Purpose Of Limitations On Subcontracting, Only Vip-listed Sdvosbs (including Independent Contractors) Shall Be Considered Eligible And/or Similarly Situated (i.e., A Firm That Has The Same Small Business Program Status As The Prime Contractor). An Otherwise Eligible Firm Further Agrees To Comply With The Required Certification Requirements In This Solicitation (see 852.219-75 Or 852.219-76 As Applicable). These Requirements Are Summarized As Follows: (1) Services. In The Case Of A Contract For Services (except Construction), The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance To Firms That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs (excluding Direct Costs To The Extent They Are Not The Principal Purpose Of The Acquisition And The Sdvosb/vosb Does Not Provide The Service, Such As Airline Travel, Cloud Computing Services, Or Mass Media Purchases). When A Contract Includes Both Services And Supplies, The 50 Percent Limitation Shall Apply Only To The Service Portion Of The Contract (2) Supplies/products. (i) In The Case Of A Contract For Supplies Or Products (other Than From A Non-manufacturer Of Such Supplies), The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance, Excluding The Cost Of Materials, To Firms That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs. When A Contract Includes Both Supply And Services, The 50 Percent Limitation Shall Apply Only To The Supply Portion Of The Contract. (ii) In The Case Of A Contract For Supplies From A Non-manufacturer, The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Supply The Product Of A Domestic Small Business Manufacturer Or Processor, Unless A Waiver As Described In 13 Cfr 121.406(b)(5) Has Been Granted. Refer To 13 Crf 125.6(a)(2)(ii) For Guidance Pertaining To Multiple Item Procurements. (3) General Construction. In The Case Of A Contract For General Construction, The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 85% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance, Excluding The Cost Of Materials, To Firms That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs. (4) Special Trade Construction Contractors. In The Case Of A Contract For Special Trade Contractors, No More Than 75% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance, Excluding The Cost Of Materials, May Be Paid To Firms That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs. (5) Subcontracting. An Sdvosb Must Meet The Naics Size Standard Assigned By The Prime Contractor And Be Listed In Vip To Count As Similarly Situated. Any Work That A First Tier Vip-listed Sdvosb Subcontractor Further Subcontracts Will Count Towards The Percent Of Subcontract Amount That Cannot Be Exceeded. For Supply Or Construction Contracts, The Cost Of Materials Is Excluded And Not Considered To Be Subcontracted. When A Contract Includes Both Services And Supplies, The 50 Percent Limitation Shall Apply Only To The Portion Of The Contract With The Preponderance Of The Expenditure Upon Which The Assigned Naics Is Based. For Information And More Specific Requirements, Refer To 13 Cfr 125.6. (e) Required Limitations On Subcontracting Compliance Measurement Period. An Sdvosb Shall Comply With The Limitations On Subcontracting As Follows: _x_by The End Of The Base Term Of The Contract Or Order, And Then By The End Of Each Subsequent Option Period; Or __by The End Of The Performance Period For Each Order Issued Under The Contract. (f) Joint Ventures. A Joint Venture May Be Considered Eligible As An Sdvosb If The Joint Venture Is Listed In Vip And Complies With The Requirements In 13 Cfr 125.18(b), Provided That Any Requirement Therein That Applies To An Sdvo Sbc Is To Be Construed To Apply To A Vip-listed Sdvosb. A Joint Venture Agrees That, In The Performance Of The Contract, The Applicable Percentage Specified In Paragraph (d) Of This Clause Will Be Performed By The Aggregate Of The Joint Venture Participants. (g) Precedence. The Va Veterans First Contracting Program, As Defined In Vaar 802.101, Subpart 819.70, And This Clause, Takes Precedence Over Any Inconsistencies Between The Requirements Of The Sba Program For Sdvo Sbcs, And The Va Veterans First Contracting Program. (h) Misrepresentation. Pursuant To 38 U.s.c. 8127(g), Any Business Concern, Including All Its Principals, That Is Determined By Va To Have Willfully And Intentionally Misrepresented A Company's Sdvosb Status Is Subject To Debarment From Contracting With The Department For A Period Of Not Less Than Five Years (see Vaar 809.406-2 Causes For Debarment). submission Requirements: unless Paper Offers Are Specifically Authorized In An Individual Solicitation, All Responses To Solicitations Must Be Submitted Electronically As Described Below. Responses Submitted In A Paper Form Are Unacceptable. Failure To Comply With This Requirement May Jeopardize The Possibility Of Receiving An Award Due To Noncompliance With The Submission Requirements. email Submission Requirements Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit: One (1) Electronic Sf 330, Including Parts I And Ii, And Attachments (if Any) To Amanda.baumler@va.gov No Later Than 10am, Eastern Standard Time (est) On Tuesday, January 21st 2025 Submittals Received After The Date And Time Identified Will Not Be Considered. The Submittal Will Be Date And Time Stamped By The Microsoft Email System And Will Be The Official Record Of Receipt For The Submission. All Sf 330 Submissions Shall Be Clearly Indicated In Subject Line, Displaying The Solicitation Number And Project Number And Title (abbreviated And Shortened Is Okay). Submission Is To Be No More Than A Total Of Fifty (50) Pages; Size Of Emails Is Not To Exceed 10 Megabytes (mb). If More Than One Email Is Sent, Please Number Emails In Subject Line As 1 Of 2, 2 Of 2 Etc. all Sf 330 Submissions Must Include The Following Information Either On The Sf 330 Or By Accompanying Document: 1. Cover Page With Solicitation Number, Project Number And Title 2. Table Of Contents 3. Copy Of Valid State Registration For Each Lead Designer 4. Copy Of Current Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/ Sdvosb/vosb Certification 5. Duns Number 6. Cage Code 7. Tax Id Number 8. Email Address And Phone Number (including The Area Code) Of The Primary Point Of Contact.

Details: N0016425r1025 Indefinite Delivery/indefinite Quantity (idiq) Contract For Multi‐ Discipline Architect‐engineer (a‐e) Services In Support Of Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division (nswc Crane) Facilities Projects At Naval Support Activitys Crane (nsa Crane), Crane, Indiana And Lake Glendora Test Facility (lgtf), Sullivan In. description: All Information Needed For Interested Parties To Submit A Standard Form Sf 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications Is Contained Herein. There Is No Separate Request For Proposals (rfp) Package To Download. related Notices: N0016422snb83, N0016424snb55, N0016424r1025, N0016424snc12, N0016425snb08 background: the Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division (nswc Crane) Requires A-e Services In Support Of Various Projects At Nsa Crane And Lgtf. This Procurement Will Result In One Single-award Idiq Contract For Multi‐discipline A‐e Services For Planning, Design, Construction, Evaluation Of New Construction, And Renovation Projects. These Services Will Be Procured In Accordance With 40 United States Code (usc) Chapter 11, Selection Of Architects And Engineers, As Implemented By Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36.6. The Idiq Contract Will Be For A Five-year Ordering Period. This Is A Five-year Contract, With No Option Years. The Maximum Value For The Contract Term, Including All Awards, Shall Not Exceed $12,000,000. There Will Be No Minimum Dollar Limit Per Order And The Maximum Dollar Limit Per Order Will Be $5m In Compliance With The $9m Fy24 Ndaa Prescription. The Guaranteed Minimum For The Contract Ordering Period Is $5,000 And Will Be Satisfied By Simultaneous Award Of The Initial Task Order With The Basic Contract. Firm‐fixed Price Task Orders Will Be Negotiated At The Task Order Level. In Accordance With Dfars Subpart 236.6, The Contract Price Or The Estimated Cost And Fee For Production And Delivery Of Designs, Plans, Drawings, And Specifications Shall Not Exceed Ten (10) Percent Of The Estimated Construction Cost Of The Public Work Or Construction, Excluding Fees. there Will Be No Minimum Dollar Limits Per Task Order. The Estimated Award Date Is October 2025. this Proposed Contract Is Anticipated To Be A Full And Open Procurement. The North American Industry Classification System (naics) Code Is 541330, Engineering Services, And The Small Business Size Standard Is $25,500,000. The Product And Services Code (psc) Is C219 Architect And Engineering- General: Structural Engineering. The Government Seeks The Most Highly Qualified Firm To Perform The Required Services, Based On The Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications, In Accordance With The Selection Criteria Included Herein. comprehensive A‐e Services Are Required For The New Construction, Repair, Replacement, Demolition, Alteration, And/or Improvement Of Facility Projects. Projects May Include Single Or Multiple Disciplines, Such As: Structural, Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Architectural, Planning, Environmental, Fire Protection, Cost Estimating, And/or Geotechnical. The Types Of Projects May Include: Building Renovations; Building Additions; Site Work Required To Support New Work; New Construction; Parking Areas; Foundations; Retaining Walls; Failure Investigation Including Destructive And Non‐destructive Testing; Seismic Evaluation And Design; Progressive Collapse Analysis; Blast Resistant Design; Structural Engineering Investigations; Utility Systems Including sanitary And Storm; Water Systems; Electrical Power Systems, Storm Water Management; Surveying; Pavement Design; And Civil Engineering Studies. the Selected Offeror Will Be Solely Responsible For The Designs Produced On The Resulting Task Order Contracts And Will Be Recorded As The Designer Of Record. The Successful Offeror Shall Also Be Accountable And Responsible For Contributions To Design-build Rfp Preparation And All Other Requirement Submittals To The Government. in Accordance With Far 36.604 And The Supplements Thereto, And Upon Final Acceptance Or Termination, All Task Orders Above $35,000 Will Receive A Performance Evaluation. A Performance Evaluation May Be Prepared For Lesser Task Orders And Interim Performance Evaluations May Be Prepared At Any Time. Performance Evaluations Will Be Maintained For Use In Future Source Selections For Architect-engineer Services. performance Location(s): crane, Indiana sullivan, Indiana requirements: for Complete Details On This Requirement See Attachment 1, “statement Of Work (sow).” Specific Types Of A‐e Services That May Be Required Under This Contract Include: facility Planning And Project Development: Services May Include Work Such As The Following: Prepare Master Plans, Project/site Plans For Proposed Facility/infrastructure Projects. Facility Planning May Be Requested For Renovation, Addition, Repair And New Construction Projects. development Of Design‐bid‐build (dbb) Packages: Services May Include Preparation Of Drawings And Specifications For Renovation, Addition, Repair Or New Construction Projects. Design Meetings With The Government May Be Required In Order To Agree On Design Solution(s) That Meet The Government’s Project Requirements. Electronic Document Delivery Details Will Be Specified At The Order Level. Electronic Delivery Shall Include Both .pdf And .dwg Formats. development Of Design‐build (db) Request For Proposal (rfp) Packages: Services May Include Working With A Construction Manager As Part Of A Design-build Team To Prepare Drawings And Specifications For Renovation, Additions, Repair Or New Construction Projects. Design Meetings With The Government May Be Required In Order To Agree On Design-build Solution(s) That Meet The Government’s Project Requirements. Electronic Document Delivery Details Will Be Specified At The Order Level. Electronic Delivery Shall Be Include Both .pdf And .dwg Formats. preparation Of Cost Estimates Using Unit Guidance, Parametric Methodologies, And Detailed Cost Estimating: Services May Include Preparing Cost Estimates To Include Rough Order Of Magnitude Through Construction Working Estimates For Renovation, Addition, Repair And/or New Construction Projects Based On Prepared Design Documents, As Called Out In The Task Order. development Of Alternatives And Economic Analysis: Service May Include Providing Alternate Design Solutions And Associated Economic Impacts For Renovation, Addition, Repair Or New Construction Projects. condition Assessment: Services May Include Performing Studies Of Existing Buildings And/or Components Of Buildings To Validate Existing Conditions That May Then Be Used To Inform Future Proposed Design Solutions. Site Visits May Be Required To Document Existing Facility/infrastructure Conditions. field Investigations (including Utility And Geotechnical): Services May Include Conducting Field Surveys/investigations Of Existing Sites, Buildings Or Specific Components Of A Building (i.e., Hvac Or Electrical Systems) In Order To Document Current Status Of A Facility’s Infrastructure. The Results Of Any Field Investigations May Then Be Used To Assist With The Preparation Of Design Documents For A Particular Project. surveying And Mapping: Services May Include Surveying And/or Mapping Of Existing Or Proposed Sites For A New Construction Project Or Building Addition. Survey Work May Be Required In Order To Document Existing Site Conditions To Support Site/civil Design Solutions. preparation Of Engineering Evaluations: Services May Include Performing Engineering Calculations To Support Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing Or Fire Protection Design Solutions. incorporation Of Sustainable Engineering Design Practices: Services May Include Incorporation Of Design Principles For Renovation, Addition, Repair And/or New Construction Projects To Support Sustainable Design Solutions And/or Leadership In Energy And Environmental Design (leed) Certification. consultations: Services May Include Collaborating With Other Specialty Design Professionals To Offer And Propose Design Solutions Required To Respond To Unique Project Requirements. energy Computations: Services May Include Preparation Of Energy Calculations To Verify Proposed Design Solutions Comply With Required Building Codes, Federal, State And/or Local Energy Requirements. geotechnical Investigations: Services May Include Conducting Soil Boring Testing In Order To Identify Minimum Design Requirements For New Construction Projects Or Building Additions. obtaining Permits And Regulatory Approvals: Services May Include Submitting Design Documents To Local, State And/or Federal Jurisdictions For Review And Approval Prior To Proceeding With Renovation/construction Work. environmental Investigation And Consultation: Services May Include Providing Design Services Required To Meet Environmental/epa Regulations On Facility/infrastructure Projects And Providing Consultation(s)/collaboration With The Government To Discuss Acceptable Environmental Design Alternatives And Solutions. review Of Construction Contractor Submittals: Services May Include Review Of Project Submittals (such As Product Data Or Product Samples) In Order To Validate Proposed Materials/products Comply With Design Drawings And/or Specifications. field Consultation And Inspection During Construction: Services May Include Responding To Contractor Requests For Information (rfis) During Construction In Order To Address Design Questions That May Arise During Construction/renovation Projects. commissioning: Services May Include Supporting The Commissioning Process By Attending Commissioning Meetings In Order To Validate Engineered Design Solutions Are Incorporated Into The Project In Accordance With Design Specifications. operation And Maintenance Support Information (omsi): Services May Include Providing The Government With O&m Documentation And Training, Where Applicable, Based On The Final Design Solution And Construction. Electronic Document Delivery Details Shall Be Included With Each Order. Electronic Delivery Shall Include Both .pdf And .dwg Formats. as‐built Drawing Preparation: Services May Include Updating Design Documents Including Drawings And Specifications To Accurately Reflect Construction Field Changes And Document Final As-built Construction/renovation Projects. Electronic Document Delivery Details Shall Be Included With Each Order. Electronic Delivery Shall Include Both .pdf And .dwg Formats functional Analysis Concept Development (facd)/design Charrette/other Design And Construction Related Workshops And Meetings: Contractor Shall Attend Design Meetings To Collaborate With Government Representatives To Consider Design Options And Build Consensus Regarding Preferred Design Solution(s). Contractor Shall Provide Meeting Minutes (cdrl A005). document Deliverable Requirements: cdrl did Number did Title did Description/scope deliverable Schedule a001 di-misc-80508b technical Report - Study/services studies And Specifications at Milestone/ Asreq a002 di-fncl-81116 Not 2 manhour Estimate, Technical Cost Proposals manpower And Cost Estimate To Implement The Statement Of Work (sow) at Milestone a003 di-mgmt-80061a Not 2 engineering And Technical Services Accomplishment Report production Report weekly a004 di-misc-81274 Not 2 environmental Permits outlines Submittal Procedures To Be Applied To All Permits asreq a005 di-admn-81250c meeting Minutes meeting Minutes 2 Days After Meeting a006 di-mgmt-81597 personnel Resumes contractor’s Personnel Roster With Relevant Qualifications And Certifications post Award Kickoff a007 di-mgmt-80507 project Planning Chart schedule post Award Kick Off a008 di-admn-81249c meeting Agenda meeting Agenda 1 Day Before Meeting a009 di-facr-82278 installation Design Package designs And Drawings asreq other Special Considerations: as Defined By Paragraph 1‐5 Of United Facilities Criteria (ufc) 3‐ 600‐01, Fire Protection Engineering For Facilities, This Contract Requires The Services Of A Licensed Fire Protection Engineer Or Consultant. asbestos And/or Lead‐based Paint Assessments May Be Required On This Contract To Determine The Presence Of Hazardous Material During Removals/demolition Or At Utility Points Of Connections. Work On And Around Waterfront Structures, Including Under Deck And Underwater, And Work In Confined Spaces May Be Required On This Contract. A‐e Firms Must Be Able To Accept Work That Involves Asbestos, Lead Paint, Poly‐chlorinated Biphenyls (pcbs), And Other Hazardous Materials, Work On And Under Waterfront Structures, And In Confined Spaces. all Engineering And Design Services Shall Comply With The Most Current Edition Of Facilities Criteria (fc) 1‐300‐09n Design Procedures, And Other Requirements As Indicated On The Whole Building Design Guide (wbdg) Web Site (www.wbdg.org). The Selected A-e Contractor Shall Have Online Access To Web‐based Support Programs Capable Of Creating Auto-cad Documents For Government Review, And Email Via The Internet For Routine Exchange Of Correspondence. The Selected A-e Contractor Shall Submit And Maintain An A‐e Accident Prevention Plan (app) In Accordance With U.s. Army Corp Of Engineers (usace) Em 385‐1‐1 For Each Project On This Contract And Activity Hazard Analysis (aha) For Each In‐field Action. Key Personnel, Including Consultants, Must Be U.s. Citizens. a‐e Firms Are Advised That The Selected Firm, Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, And Its Consultants Which Design, Prepare, Or Provide Engineering Services In Support Of Construction Contract Documents Cannot Provide Construction Services For The Same Contract. This Includes Concept Design, Preparation Of Project Programming Documents (dd Form 1391), Facility Siting Studies, Environmental Assessments, Geotechnical Services, Engineering Studies And Services, Design‐build Request For Proposals (rfps), Or Other Activities That Result In Identification Of Project Scope And Cost. The Awarded Contract Will Be Subject To Specific Provisions Addressing The Avoidance Of Organizational Conflicts Of Interest, Including H-209-h003, Required Disclosure Of Organizational Conflict Of Interest (navsea) (nov 2022). The Prime Firm For This Contract Will Be Required To Perform Throughout The Contract Term. in Accordance With Far 19.702, Each Solicitation Of Offers To Perform A Contract That Is Expected To Exceed $750,000 ($1.5 Million For Construction) And That Has Subcontracting Possibilities, Shall Require The Apparently Successful Offeror To Submit An Acceptable Small Business Subcontracting Plan. If The Apparently Successful Offeror Fails To Negotiate A Subcontracting Plan Acceptable To The Contracting Officer Within The Time Limit Prescribed By The Contracting Officer, The Offeror Will Be Ineligible For Award. submission Requirements: submission Requirements - Sf 330 Part I typed, 12 Point Times New Roman, Shall Not Exceed 100 Single‐sided 8.5 By 11 Inch Pages criterion criterion Title criterion Requirements criterion 1 specialized Experience sf 330, Part I, Section F - Minimum Of Three (3) And Maximum Of Five (5) Projects Completed (project Completion To Be Defined As Receiving Final Design Acceptance From Client) Within The Past Seven (7) Years criterion 2 professional Qualifications And Technical Competence sf 330, Part I, Section E – Resumes For All Proposed Key Personnel That Illustrate Experience In The Type Of Work Proposed Under This Contract. Resumes Are Limited To Three Pages And Should Indicate: Professional Registration, Certification, Licensure And/or Accreditation In Appropriate Disciplines; Cite Recent (within The Past 10 Years) Project‐specific Experience In Work Relevant To The Services Required Under This Contract; And Indicate Proposed Role In This Contract. Indicate Participation Of Key Personnel In Example Projects In The Sf 330, Part I, Section G. criterion 3 past Performance submit A Completed Cpars/acass/ppq Evaluation For Each Project Under Criterion 1 criterion 4 quality Control describe The Quality Control Program That Will Be Utilized For All Deliverables Of This Contract And The Management Approach For Quality Control Processes And Procedures. criterion 5 program Management And Capacity 1. Provide An Organizational Chart For The Team And Discuss The Management Plan For This Contract And Personnel Roles In The Organization. Include Small Business Participation Specifics. 2. Describe The Firm’s Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period. 3. Describe The Firm’s Ability To Sustain The Loss Of Key Personnel While Accomplishing Work Within Required Time Limits, To Ensure Continuity Of Services And Ability To Meet Surges In Unexpected Project Demands And Ability To Adhere To Schedules And Budgets. criterion 6 knowledge Of General Geographic Area 1. Indicate Location Of The Office(s) That Will Be Performing The Work, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices, And Offices Of Team Members. 2. Provide A Narrative Describing The Team’s Knowledge And Previous Experience Of The Primary Geographic Areas To Be Covered By This Contract. 3. Provide A Narrative To Describe The Team’s Ability To Provide Timely Response To Requests For On‐site Support. criterion 7 volume Of Work firms Shall Not Submit Data For This Factor. a‐e Firms Desiring To Be Considered For This Contract Shall Submit A Completed Sf 330 Package By Dod Safe To The Contracting Officer And The Contract Specialist. The Sf 330 Shall Be Typed, 12 Point Times New Roman. Part I Shall Not Exceed 100 Single‐sided 8.5 By 11 Inch Pages (the 100 Page Limit Does Not Include The First Eight (8) Instructional Pages Of The Sf 330, Individual Subcontracting Reports (isrs), The Small Business Subcontracting Plan Or Certificates/licenses, Nor Does The Page Limit Include Cover Sheets Or Dividers, Provided That These Do Not Contain Any Substantive Information Submitted In Response To The Synopsis Or Intended To Demonstrate The Qualifications Of The Firm). Part I Pages Shall Be Numbered Sequentially. Introductions Shall Be Included In Sections E And F. A-e Firm Submissions Shall Include Its Unique Entity Identifier (uei), Commercial And Government Entity (cage), And Taxpayer Identification Number (tin) Numbers In Block 30 Of The Sf 330. submissions To This Proposal Announcement Must Be Submitted Electronically Through Dod Safe. No Paper Copies, Email, Cd-roms Or Facsimile Submissions Will Be Accepted. Electronic Proposal Submission Is Required Through The Army’s Electronic File Sharing Service, Dod Safe (https://safe.apps.mil). The Dod Safe Application Is Used To Send Large Files To Individuals That Would Normally Be Too Large To Send Via Email. There Are No User Accounts For Dod Safe. Authentication Is Handled Via Email. anyone Has Access To Dod Safe And The Application Is Available For Use By Anyone. The Dod Safe “getting Started Guide” Has Information On How To Utilize The System (https://safe.apps.mil/about.php). Instructions For Uploading Are As Follows: send An Email To The Contracting Officer And Contract Specialist To Receive The Link To Drop Off Your Proposal. This Will Need To Be Completed Five (5) Business Days Prior To The Proposal Due Date. contract Specialist, Aaron Hohl, Aaron.m.hohl.civ@us.navy.mil contracting Officer, Jared Myers, Jared.s.myers3.civ@us.navy.mil . you Will Receive An Email With The Link To Submit Your Drop Off. The Link Will Be Provided No Later Than Two (2) Business Days Prior To The Proposal Due Date. short Note To The Recipients: Click The Add Files Or Drag And Drop Your Files. For File Description, Enter N0016425r1025-firmname. click Upload Button To Send Documents. guest Users Will Need To Check Their Email To Verify Their Email Address Before The Recipients Will Be Notified. (government-issued Common Access Cards (cacs) Are Not Required). file Size Limitations: Offerors Are Advised To Follow The Dod Safe Instruction For Uploading Files. Dod Safe Supports Delivery Up To 8gb. If Needed, Offerors Are Advised To Break The Files Down To Smaller Sections In Order To Upload It To The System. In Such Cases, Please Divide The Sections As Logically As Possible And Be Sure To Clearly Name The Files As Specified Below. file Naming Convention: To Ensure Your Submission Is Received And Processed Appropriately, It Is Important That Interested Parties Carefully Ensure Their Electronic Files Adhere To The Following Naming Convention: xxx- Firmname- Volume I xxx- Firmname- Volume Ii each File Name Shall Begin With The Solicitation Number Followed By The Firm’s Name And A Brief File Description. Please See Examples Above. file Organization: Although Hard Copies Are Not Accepted, Each File Shall Be Clearly Indexed, And Logically Assembled. Font Size Shall Be 12 Or Larger. Pages Shall Be Letter Sized (larger Page Sizes (such As 11x17 Foldouts, Etc.) Will Be Counted As One Page. Proposals Shall Be In Narrative Format, Organized, And Titled So That Each Section Of The Proposal Follows The Order And Format Of The Criterion. Information Presented Should Be Organized So As To Pertain To Only The Evaluation Factor In The Section That The Information Is Presented. Information Pertaining To More Than One Evaluation Factor Should Be Repeated In Each Section For Each Factor. upload Completion And Deadline: Interested Offerors Shall Submit Proposals No Later Than The Date And Time Specified In This Synopsis. The Time And Date Of The Proposal Receipt Will Be Upload Completion/delivery Time And Date Recorded Within Dod Safe Site. Do Not Assume That Electronic Submission Will Occur Instantaneously. Large Files (e.g. 10mb Or More) Will Take Some Time To Upload. Offerors Should Time Their Upload Effort With Prudence By Not Waiting Until The Last Few Minutes- This Will Allow For Unexpected Delays In The Transmittal Process. Offerors Are Encouraged To Keep A Copy Of The Upload Confirmation For Their Record. Submissions After The Deadline Will Be Considered Late And Will Be Processed In Accordance With Far 15.208. electronic Files: Files Shall Be In Their Native Format (i.e .,.docx, .xlsx, .ppt, Etc.), Or If In .pdf Format, Shall Be In Searchable Text. Text And Graphics Portfolios Of The Electronic Copies Shall Be In A Format Readable By Microsoft Office Or Adobe Applications. Data Submitted In A Spreadsheet Format Shall Be Readable By Ms Excel (all Cells And Formulars Shall Be Unlocked). all Contractors Are Advised That Registration In System For Award Management (sam) Database Is Required Prior To Award Of A Contract. Failure To Register In The Sam Database May Render Your Firm Ineligible For Award. For More Information, Check The Sam Web Site: Https://www.sam.gov. the Technical Data Package May Contain Information That Is Export Controlled. Only Those Companies That Have Completed Dd Form 2345 And Are Certified Under The Joint Certification Program (jcp) In An Active Status Are Authorized To Receive Export Controlled Information. Only Jcp Certified Firms Will Be Eligible For Any Future Award Made Related To This Effort. Additional Information About Jcp Is Available At Https://www.dla.mil/hq/logisticsoperations/services/jcp/. offerors Shall Restrict The Disclosure Or Use Of Its Proposal, (and) A Proper Legend Must Be Included On Materials Provided. Individual Subcontractor/vendor Proprietary Information May Be Submitted Separately. In Addition, If Proposal Volumes Include Technical Requirements That Have Been Identified As Cui, The Markings Shall Apply To The Technical Information Included In The Technical Volume. offeror Shall Mark Proposal Documents As Cui In Accordance With Nist Sp 800-171. Possible Categories For Use Include But Are Not Limited To The Following: cui Category: General Proprietary Business Information https://www.archives.gov/cui/registry/category-detail/proprietary-business-info.html#authority-list banner Marking For Specified Authorities: Cui//sp-propin banner Marking For Basic Authorities: Cui category Description: material And Information Relating To, Or Associated With, A Company's Products, Business, Or Activities, Including But Not Limited To Financial Information; Data Or Statements; Trade Secrets; Product Research And Development; Existing And Future Product Designs And Performance Specifications. *at A Minimum Technical Proposals Shall Safeguard In Accordance With Markings And Distributions Statements On All Technical Documents Within The Solicitation (sow, Specification, Drawings, Etc.). cui Category: Controlled Technical Information* https://www.archives.gov/cui/registry/category-detail/controlled-technical-info.html#authority-list banner Marking: Cui//sp-cti category Description: controlled Technical Information Means Technical Information With Military Or Space Application That Is Subject To Controls On The Access, Use, Reproduction, Modification, Performance, Display, Release, Disclosure, Or Dissemination. Controlled Technical Information Is To Be Marked With One Of The Distribution Statements B Through F, In Accordance With Department Of Defense Instruction 5230.24, "distribution Statements Of Technical Documents." The Term Does Not Include Information That Is Lawfully Publicly Available Without Restrictions. "technical Information" Means Technical Data Or Computer Software, As Those Terms Are Defined In Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Clause 252.227-7013, "rights In Technical Data - Noncommercial Items" (48 Cfr 252.227-7013). Examples Of Technical Information Include Research And Engineering Data, Engineering Drawings, And Associated Lists, Specifications, Standards, Process Sheets, Manuals, Technical Reports, Technical Orders, Catalog-item Identifications, Data Sets, Studies And Analyses And Related Information, And Computer Software Executable Code And Source Code. category Marking: cti *at A Minimum Technical Proposals Shall Safeguard In Accordance With Markings And Distributions Statements On All Technical Documents Within The Solicitation (sow, Specification, Drawings, Etc.). cui Category: General Procurement And Acquisition https://www.archives.gov/cui/registry/category-detail/procurement-acquisition.html#authority-list banner Marking: Cui//sp-procure category Description: material And Information Relating To, Or Associated With, The Acquisition And Procurement Of Goods And Services, Including But Not Limited To, Cost Or Pricing Data, Contract Information, Indirect Costs And Direct Labor Rates. category Marking: procure cui Category: Source Selection https://www.archives.gov/cui/registry/category-detail/source-selection banner Marking For Specified Authorities: Cui//sp-ssel banner Marking For Basic Authorities: Cui category Description: per Far 2.101: Any Of The Following Information That Is Prepared For Use By An Agency For The Purpose Of Evaluating A Bid Or Proposal To Enter Into An Agency Procurement Contract, If That Information Has Not Been Previously Made Available To The Public Or Disclosed Publicly: (items 1-10). category Marking: ssel each Volume Submitted Shall Be Properly Marked With At A Minimum Ssel As Follows: a Cover Page Including The “cui” Marking In The Header And Footer As Required, As Well As The Requiredcui Designator Block If The Volume Contains Cui. This Designator Block Shall Be Included At The Bottom Right Portion Of The Cover Page And Read As Follows: controlled By: Department Of The Navy controlled By: Nswc Crane Code 02 cui Category: Propin/cti/procure/ssel distribution/dissemination Control: Fedcon poc: Nswccr 0253 Branch Head all Subsequent Pages Of The Document Shall Include The “cui” Marking In The Header And Footer. If Other Information Is Included In The Header Or Footer, The "cui" Marking Shall Be Centered On Its Own Line Within The Header And Footer. in Accordance With The Federal Acquisition Regulations (far) 36.601-4(b), The A-e Firm Must Be A Professional A-e Firm Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering In The State Of Indiana. This Requirement Can Be Achieved By Providing The Firm’s Indiana Secretary Of State Registration, And Currently Employing At Least Two (2) State Of Indiana Registered A-e Professionals. A-e Firms Shall Provide Proof That The Firm Is Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering In Indiana (e.g., Indiana Secretary Of State Registration And Employee’s State Of Indiana Professional Engineering License With Stamp Or State Of Indiana Registered Architect License With Stamp). Failure To Submit The Required Proof Will Result In A Firm’s Elimination From Consideration. all Businesses Intending To Conduct Business In Indiana, Except Sole Proprietors And General Partnerships, Must Register With The Indiana Secretary Of State. If A Business Needs To Be Registered, Please Do So At Www.inbiz.in.gov. jv Offerors Must Ensure That Both Entities Are Either State Registered Individually In Accordance With The Information Above, Or State Registered As A Jv In Accordance With The Information Above. only Those Companies That Have Completed Dd Form 2345 And Are Certified Under The Joint Certification Program (jcp) In An Active Status Are Authorized To Receive Export-controlled Information. Only Jcp Certified Firms Will Be Eligible For Any Future Award Made Related To This Effort. please Provide A-e Professional Licensure Proof Within Sf 330, Part I, Section E. Please Provide Secretary Of State Registration Information Within Sf 330, Part I, Section H. please Provide Jcp Registration Specifics Within Sf 330, Part I, Section E. Include Jcp Certification Number, Jcp Status, And Jcp Expiration Date. If Currently Working To Acquire Jcp Certification, You May Provide A Brief Explanation Of Your Firm’s Progress Towards Certification. However, Only Actively Jcp Certified Firms Will Be Eligible For Award. Jcp Active Status Will Be Confirmed Via Https://www.public.dacs.dla.mil/jcp/ext/ On The Day Of Proposal Submission. firms Must Also Acknowledge All Amendments To The Solicitation Within Their Proposal. A Statement Of Amendment Acknowledgement Within Sf 330, Part I, Section H Will Suffice. Please Address Individual Amendments Along With Corresponding Date Of Issuance On Sam.gov With Your Proposal. A Signed Copy Of The Amendments Is Not Required. if An Sf 254/sf 255 Is Submitted For This Request, It Will Not Be Reviewed Or Considered. As Required Above, Provide Verifiable Evidence That Your Firm Is Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering (e.g., State Registration Number). interested Firms Shall Submit Proposals To Both The Contract Specialist And The Contracting Officer Via Dod Safe. sf 330 Submissions Are Due No Later Than 9 January 2025 At 12:00 Pm (est). Late Responses Will Be Handled In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulations (far) 52.215‐1. The Points Of Contact For This Acquisition Are Contract Specialist, Aaron Hohl, At Aaron.m.hohl.civ@us.navy.mil And Jared Myers, Contracting Officer, At Jared.s.myers3.civ@us.navy.mil. inquiries Concerning This Procurement Should Reference The Solicitation Number (n0016425r1025) And Title And Be Forwarded Via Email To The Points Of Contact Identified Above. Questions Pertaining To This Requirement Are Due No Later Than Fourteen (14) Days After Posting Of This Requirement In Sam.gov. list Of Attachments: statement Of Work (sow) cdrls past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) key Personnel Criteria dd 254 selection Criteria: firms Responding To This Special Notice Will Be Evaluated To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms To Perform The Required Services In Accordance With The Published Selection Criteria. failure To Comply With Instructions Or Provide Complete Information May Affect The Firm’s Evaluation Or Disqualify The Firm From Further Consideration. Evaluation Criteria (1) Through (4) Are Considered Most Important And Are Equal Among Themselves; Criteria (5) Through (6) Are Less Important And Are Equal Among Themselves; Criteria (7) Will Only Be Used As A Tie‐breaker Among Technically Equal Firms. Specific Selection Criteria Include: specialized Experience professional Qualifications And Technical Competence past Performance quality Control program Management And Capacity knowledge Of General Geographic Area volume Of Work (no Data Submission Required) criterion 1 —specialized Experience (sf 330, Part I, Section F): firms Will Be Evaluated On Specialized Experience In Performance Of Services Similar To Those Anticipated Under This Contract Through Evaluation Of Experience In: infrastructure/facility Design Utilizing The Following Criteria, Including, But Not Limited To, Unified Facilities Criteria (ufcs) And Military Standard (milstd); conducting On‐site Design Development Workshops, Charrettes, Functional Analysis, Schematic Design, Or Space Programming, Including Supporting Budgetary Or Parametric Cost Estimating; demonstrated Ability To Design To Project Budget And Schedule; experience Preparing Design‐bid‐build; experience Preparing Design‐build Rfp Packages; And designing Projects In Accordance With Dod, Navy, Or Other Government Agencies’ Criteria. use Of Specsintact For Package Generation And Submittal To The Government specialized Design Experience To Include Antiterrorism Force Protection (atfp), Seismic Design And Analysis, And Design Of Secure Spaces firms May Be Considered More Favorably Under Criterion 1 By Demonstrating The Following: demonstrated Experience On Military Bases Within The Primary Geographic Area Of The Contract. experience In The Delivery Of Multiple Types Of A‐e Services Identified In The Requirements Above. experience On Multiple Facility Types, Such As Business, Educational, Industrial, Assembly, Health Care, Residential, Storage, Laboratory, And Mixed-use Occupancies, Identified In The Requirements Above. demonstrated Experience Using Rsmeans-based (or Equal) Electronic Cost Estimating Software. demonstrated Experience Designing Modifications To Existing Structures And Developing Construction Phasing While Associated Facilities Are Required To Remain In Service. demonstrated Experience Specific To Navy Facility Projects, Illustrating The Capability Of The A‐e Firm And Individual Design Team Members (a‐e Staff, Key Personnel, Consultants) To Work Within The Navy Project Planning Process Including: dd Form 1391 Development In The Navy’s Electronic Procurement Generator (epg), dd Form 1391 Validation Procedures Including Cost Validation. demonstrated Understanding Of Procedures And Timely Submission Of Base Access Documents In Adherence With Security, Safety, Environmental, And Accident Prevention Regulations In Order To Support A‐e Activities And Maintain Project Schedules. experience Of A‐e Firm And Individual Design Team Members (a‐e Staff, Key Personnel, Sub‐ Consultants) With Facilities Located In Historic Areas That Will Require Consultation With State Historic Preservation Officer (shpo) Throughout The Design Process. criterion 1 Submission Requirements: provide Up To A Minimum Of Three (3) And Maximum Of Five (5) Projects Completed (project Completion To Be Defined As Receiving Final Design Acceptance From Client) Within The Past Seven (7) Years Immediately Preceding The Date Of Issuance Of This Notice That Best Demonstrate Specialized Experience Of The Proposed Team In The Areas Outlined Above. Sufficient Information To Determine The Date Of Completion Of The Project Must Be Included In The Project Description Or The Project Will Not Be Considered. If More Than The Maximum Number Of Projects Is Submitted, The Government Will Only Evaluate Projects Up To The Maximum Number Authorized In The Order Submitted. all Projects Provided In The Sf 330 Must Be Completed By The Actual Office/branch/regional Office/ Individual Team Member Proposed To Manage And Perform Work Under This Contract. Projects Not Meeting This Requirement Will Be Excluded From Consideration In The Evaluation. To Enable Verification, Firms Should Include The Uei And Cage Along With Each Firm Name In The Sf 330 Part I, Section F, Block 25, “firm Name.” Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification Number In Block 21. Include An E‐mail Address And Phone Number For The Point Of Contact In Block 23(c). In Block 24, Include In The Project Description The Contract Period Of Performance, Award Contract Value, Current Contract Value, And A Summary Of The Work Performed That Demonstrates Relevance To Specialized Experience As Outlined Above. For Projects Performed As A Sub-contractor Or A Joint Venture Involving Different Partners, Specifically Indicate The Value Of The Work Performed As A Subcontractor Or By Those Firms Proposed For This Contract, And Identify The Specific Roles And Responsibilities Performed As A Sub-contractor Or By Those Firms On The Project Rather Than The Work Performed On The Project As A Whole. If The Project Description Does Not Clearly Delineate The Work Performed By The Entity/entities Offering/teaming On This Contract, The Firm Will Be Eliminated From Award Consideration. note: If The Firm Is A Joint Venture, Projects Performed By The Joint Venture Should Be Submitted; However, If There Are No Projects Performed By The Joint Venture, Projects Must Be Submitted For Each Joint Venture Partner, Not To Exceed A Total Of Five (5) Projects For Both Partners Combined. Each Partner Within A Jv May Not Be Responsible For More Than Three (3) Projects Within The Past Performance Submission. Firms Failing To Provide Projects From All Joint Venture Partners Will Be Considered To Have Not Met The Requirements Of The Criterion. projects Shall Be Submitted On The Sf 330 At Part I, Section F And Shall Be Completed Projects. Projects Not Completed Will Be Excluded From Evaluation Consideration. For Submittal Purposes, A Task Order On An Idiq Contract Is Considered A Project, As Is A Stand‐alone Contract Award. Do Not Submit An Idiq Base Contract As An Example Project. Instead, List Relevant Task Orders Or Stand‐ Alone Contract Awards That Fit Within The Definition Above. The Government Will Not Evaluate Information Provided For An Idiq Contract. Examples Of Project Work Submitted That Do Not Conform To This Requirement Will Not Be Evaluated. all Information For Criterion 1 Shall Be Submitted In The Sf 330, Part I, Section F. The Government Will Not Consider Information Submitted In Addition To Part I, Section F In The Evaluation Of Criterion 1. criterion 2—professional Qualifications And Technical Competence (sf 330, Part I, Sections E & G): firms Will Be Evaluated On Professional Qualifications, Competence, And Experience Of The Proposed Key Personnel In Providing Services To Accomplish The Tasks Required Under This Contract, Including Participation In Example Projects In The Sf 330, Part I, Section G. Key Personnel Are Individuals Who Will Have Major Contract Or Project Management Responsibilities And/or Will Provide Unusual Or Unique Expertise. Specific Disciplines That Must Be Included In Key Personnel Are: project Manager, Registered Architect Or Professional Engineer, 10 Years quality Control Specialist, Architect Or Professional Engineer, 15 Years architect, Senior, Registered Architect, 15 Years architect, Junior, Registered Architect, 10 Years civil Engineer, Senior, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years civil Engineer, Junior, Registered Professional Engineer, 10 Years structural Engineer, Senior, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years structural Engineer, Junior, Registered Professional Engineer, 10 Years mechanical Engineer, Senior, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years mechanical Engineer, Junior, Registered Professional Engineer, 10 Years electrical Engineer, Senior, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years electrical Engineer, Junior, Registered Professional Engineer, 10 Years registered Communication Distribution Design (rcdd), 15 Years fire Protection Engineer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years cost Estimator, Certified Cost Professional Or Equivalent, 15 Years key Personnel, Including Consultants, Shall Be U.s. Citizens. submissions Must Demonstrate Key Personnel Relevant Experience, Formal Education (e.g. Bachelor’s Or Master’s Degrees), And Relevant Professional Development Or Professional Certifications. See Key Personnel Attachment For Specific Qualification Criteria. If An Offeror Is Unable To Meet Key Personnel Requirement List In Its Entirety, The Government Still Urges A Response For Consideration Which Illustrates The Firm’s Maximum Personnel Capabilities. If Certain Key Personnel Roles Cannot Be Fulfilled, Please Indicate Those Role Vacancies Individually With A Course Of Action For Fulfillment. criteria 2 Submission Requirements: sf 330, Part I, Section E – Provide Resumes For All Proposed Key Personnel That Illustrate Experience In The Type Of Work Proposed Under This Contract. Resumes Are Limited To Three (3) Single-sided Pages And Should Indicate: Professional Registration, Certification, Licensure And/or Accreditation In Appropriate Disciplines To Include Document/licensure Numbers; Cite Recent (within The Past 10 Years) Project‐specific Experience In Work Relevant To The Services Required Under This Contract; And Indicate Proposed Role In This Contract. Indicate Participation Of Key Personnel In Example Projects In The Sf 330, Part I, Section G. The Firm Must Hold A Current And Active License In The State Of Indiana As Well As Currently Employ At Least Two (2) State Of Indiana Registered A-e Professionals. offeror Will Not Be Permitted To Simultaneously Fulfill Multiple Roles With An Individual On The Same Project. The Individuals Identified As Key Personnel On The Sf330 May Not Have Multiple Duties Or Be “dual-hatted.” Offerors Shall Provide Individual Resumes In Sf330 Section E For Each Of The Individuals Listed Above. criterion 3—past Performance (sf 330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On Past Performance With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Work Quality, Compliance With Schedules, Cost Control, And Stakeholder/customer Satisfaction. evaluating Past Performance And Experience Will Include Information Provided In The Contract performance Assessment Reporting System (cpars) / Architect-engineer Contract Administration Support System (acass) Or A Completed Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) For Criterion 1 Projects And May Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Other Information Available To The Government Including Contacts With Points Of Contact In Other Criteria. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. criteria 3 Submission Requirements: submit A Completed Cpars/acass/ppq Evaluation For Each Project Under Criterion 1. firms May Provide Any Information On Problems Encountered And The Corrective Actions Taken On Projects Submitted Under Criterion 1—specialized Experience. Firms May Also Address Any Adverse Past Performance Issues. Information For Each Past Performance Submission Shall Not Exceed Five Single‐sided Pages In Total. offeror Shall Submit One (1) Past Performance Questionnaire Provided As An Attachment To This Synopsis To Each Of Its Customer Pocs Identified In Criterion 1 For Referenced Projects With No Cpars/acass Available. In Order To Expedite The Assessment Process, The Offeror May Complete The “contract Information” Portion Of The Past Performance Questionnaire For The Convenience Of The Customer Poc. A Ppq Submission Is Not Required For Criterion 1 Projects Accompanied By A Cpars/acass. However, A Ppq Submission For Every Criterion 1 Project, Including Those With A Cpars/acass Evaluation On Record, Would Assist The Government In Evaluation Accuracy And Is Encouraged. the Offeror Shall Not, However, Complete Any Other Section Of The Past Performance Questionnaire. The Questionnaire Shall Be Provided To The Customer Poc With Instructions To Complete And Submit It Directly To The Contracting Officer And/or The Point Of Contact Identified In This Announcement On Or Before The Proposal Due Date. Electronic Submission Via Encrypted E-mail By The Customer Is Required. under No Circumstances Shall The Questionnaires Be Returned To The Offerors After Completion. Any Information Provided By The Offeror’s References Is Subject To Verification/validation By The Government During The Evaluation Process. The Government May Make Contact And Follow Up With The Listed References Identified On The Contractor Past Performance Data Documents/data. The Offeror May Provide Information On Problems Encountered On The Identified Contracts As Well As The Offeror’s Corrective Actions. The Government Reserves The Right To Solicit Feedback Beyond What Is Identified In The Questionnaire. awards, Letters Of Commendation, Certificates Of Appreciation, Etc., Shall Not Be Submitted And Will Not Be Considered In The Evaluation. criterion 4—quality Control Program (sf 330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On The Strength Of The Quality Control Program Proposed By The Firm To Ensure Quality Products And Services Under This Contract And Means Of Ensuring Quality Services From Their Consultants/subcontractors. criteria 4 Submission Requirements: describe The Quality Control Program That Will Be Utilized For All Deliverables Of This Contract And The Management Approach For Quality Control Processes And Procedures. The Description Shall: describe Specific Quality Control Processes And Procedures Proposed For This Contract To Achieve Technical Accuracy Of And Assurance Of Overall Coordination Of Plans And Specifications, And Engineering And Design Services. provide A Quality Control Process Chart Showing The Inter‐relationship Of The Management And Team Components. identify The Key Personnel (submitted Under Criterion 2—professional Qualifications And Technical Competence) Responsible For The Quality Control Program And A Description Of Their Roles And Responsibilities. describe How The Firm’s Quality Control Program Extends To Management Of Sub-contractors. explain The Quality Control Program Including An Example Of How The Plan Has Worked For One Of The Projects Submitted As Part Of Sf 330, Section F Or How The Plan Will Work If It Has Not Been Used Previously. criterion 5—program Management And Capacity (sf 330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On The Firm’s Ability To Plan For And Manage Work Under The Contract And The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. criteria 5 Submission Requirements: provide An Organizational Chart For The Team And Discuss The Management Plan For This Contract And Personnel Roles In The Organization. Describe The Ability Of The Firm To Manage, Coordinate And Work Effectively With Team Members, Both Internal Staff, Sub- Contractors And Consultants. Discuss The History Of Working Relationships With Team Members, Including Joint Venture Partners Where Applicable. describe The Firm’s Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period. Describe The Workload/availability Of The Key Personnel During The Anticipated Contract Performance Period And The Ability Of The Firm To Provide Qualified Backup Staffing For Key Personnel To Ensure Continuity Of Services. General Statements Of Availability/capacity May Be Considered Less Favorably. describe The Firm’s Ability To Sustain The Loss Of Key Personnel While Accomplishing Work Within Required Time Limits, To Ensure Continuity Of Services And Ability To Meet Surges In Unexpected Project Demands And Ability To Adhere To Schedules And Budgets. include Small Business Subcontracting Plan Specifics Which Detail Level Of Participation Of Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Woman-owned Small Business, Hubzone Small Business, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business And Veteran Owned Small Business Team Members. attach A Small Business Subcontracting Plan Which Estimates The Proposed Extent Of Participation Of Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Woman-owned Small Business, Hubzone Small Business, Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business And Veteran Owned Small Business Team Members In The Contract Team. Clearly Specify Each Small Business Firm That Is A Team Member, Their Small Business Category, And Their Proposed Level Of Participation Measured As A Percentage Of The Overall Estimated Effort. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan Draft Will Not Count Against The Total Page Count Limitation For The Firm’s Response. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan Should Be Included As An Attachment To The Sf 330 Response. Small Business Subcontracting Plan Specifics May Be Referenced Within The Sf 330 Response, But The Subcontracting Plan Should Also Be Attached In Its Entirety. criterion 6— Knowledge Of General Geographic Area (sf 330, Part I, Section H) firms Will Be Evaluated On The Locations Of Their Office Or Offices That Will Be Performing The Work Under This Contract And Demonstrated Knowledge Of The General Geographic Areas In Which Projects Could Be Located. Evaluation Of Firms Will Include Consideration Of Their Location Within The General Geographic Area Of The Anticipated Projects (primarily At Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division, Crane, In). criteria 6 Submission Requirements: indicate Location Of The Office(s) That Will Be Performing The Work, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices, And Offices Of Team Members. provide A Narrative Describing The Team’s Knowledge And Previous Experience Of The Primary Geographic Areas To Be Covered By This Contract. provide A Narrative To Describe The Team’s Ability To Provide Timely Response To Requests For On‐site Support. Provide Timelines And Examples Of The Team’s Success In Providing This Response. Include Both Primary And Sub‐contractor Support As Required. Teams With A Demonstrated History Of Providing Timely Support May Be Considered More Favorably. criterion 7—volume Of Work (sf 330, Part 1, Section H) (tie-breaker) in The Event Of A Tie Among Equally Rated Firms, Those Firms Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With Dod Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (dfars) Procedures, Guidance And Information (pgi) 236.602‐1, From Data Extracted From The Federal Procurement Data System (fpds). Firms Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of Work Previously Awarded To The Firm By Dod Within The Past Twelve (12) Months With The Objective Of Effecting An Equitable Distribution Of Contracts Among Qualified A‐e Firms Including Small, Disadvantaged Business Firms, And Firms That Have Not Had Prior Dod A‐e Contracts. criterion 7 Submission Requirements: firms Shall Not Submit Data For This Factor.