Fire Tenders

Description: Advance Contract Award Notice (acan) Solicitation Number: 24-58243 1. Advance Contract Award Notice (acan): An Acan Is A Public Notice Indicating To The Supplier Community That A Department Or Agency Intends To Award A Contract For Goods, Services Or Construction To A Pre-identified Supplier, Thereby Allowing Other Suppliers To Signal Their Interest In Bidding, By Submitting A Statement Of Capabilities. If No Supplier Submits A Statement Of Capabilities That Meets The Requirements Set Out In The Acan, On Or Before The Closing Date Stated In The Acan, The Contracting Officer May Then Proceed With The Award To The Pre-identified Supplier. 2. Definition Of The Requirement The National Research Council Canada (nrc), Located In Boucherville, Quebec, Is A Specialized Research Facility Dedicated To Battery Manufacturing. The Facility Enables The Production Of Full-size Prototype Battery Cells Using The Same Processes Used In The Lithium-ion Battery Industry. It Can Produce Either Small Cells For Research And Development (r&d) Purposes Or Large Cells Suitable For The Assembly Of Electric Vehicle (ev) Battery Packs. This Facility Enables Nrc And Its Customers To Develop And De-risk New Battery Technologies. The Facility Is Used To Evaluate And Qualify New Battery Materials And Components At Any Stage Of The Manufacturing Process. Our Team Of Battery Experts Includes Materials Chemists, Electrochemists, Engineers And Technicians With Extensive Knowledge In All Aspects Of Battery Science. Nrc Has Extensive Experience In Electrode Fabrication, Battery Assembly And Testing From Lab Scale To Industrial Prototypes, Including Active Layer Formulation And Optimization, Determination Of Critical Manufacturing Parameters, Performance Optimization, Identification Of Battery Failure Modes. The Facility Is Designed To Accommodate Two Sequential Scale-up Steps: From Laboratory Scale (coin Cell Type) To Small Research And Development Pouch Cells (size 5x8x0.3 Cm³; Capacity 300-500 Mah) And Then To Electric Vehicle (ev) Size Pouch Cells (size 17x22x1 Cm³; Capacity 20-30 Ah). This Enables The Nrc To Evaluate Novel Battery Materials With A Minimal Quantity Of Material, Typically A Few Hundred Grams. The Nrc Specializes In The Formulation Of Slurries Composed Of Innovative Materials, Including Active Materials, Conducting Additives, Binders, And The Optimization Of Slurry Composition And Mixing Strategy. Additionally, The Nrc Offers Expertise In Electrode Fabrication, Including Active Layer Coating Using The Industry-standard Slot-die Technique And The Optimization Of Electrode Porosity And Mechanical Properties. The Assessment Of Any Battery Component At The Pilot Scale Is Conducted, Including Separators, Current Collectors, And Electrolytes. Additionally, Innovative Battery Formation Protocols Are Tested, As Well As Standard Or Custom-made Battery Testing Protocols. Finally, Post-mortem Analysis Is Performed To Determine The Failure Modes. Electrode Fabrication • Bühler Hivis 3d2 Mixer, Combining Planetary And High-speed Disperser Blades • Primix Filmix 56-30, Capable Of Batch Or Continuous Mixing • Imc R2r Coater, Coating Width Up To 20 Cm, 2-zones Drying Oven (1 M Each), Active Web Guiding System; Slot-die Technique; Continuous, Stripes Or Patch Coating Available; Metered Slurry Delivery System From 0.5 L Up To 7.5 L • Imc R2r Calender, 40 T Of Pneumatic Force, 20 Cm Diameter Calendering Rolls (width 25 Cm), Hepa-filtration Enclosure • Solith Epm280 Press Cutter With Automated Edge-positioning System • Memmert Vacuum Oven For Electrode Drying Battery Assembly • Dry Room • Solith Bfm280 Pouch Embosser • Solith Sfe280 Automatic Z-folding Stack Assembly Machine • Branson Mwx100 Ultrasonic Welder For Tab Welding, Equipped With Precision Alignment Devices • Solith Mfc280 Electrolyte Filling And Degassing Machine • Rdm Test Equipment Hse-3d Pouch Side-sealer, Equipped With Precision Alignment Devices Battery Formation And Testing • Mti Bst8-3 Battery Tester, 32 Channels Up To 3a; Constant Temperature Monitoring On Each Cell • Biologic Bcs815 Battery Cycler, 64 Channels Up To 15a; Constant Temperature And Pressure Monitoring On Each Cell • Memmert Ovens; Co Gas Sensors And Automatic Safety Systems • Espec Egnx16-6nwl Environmental Chambers With Fire Detection And Suppression Capabilities; Co Gas Sensors And Automatic Safety Systems To Expand This Research Facility, Nrc Has A Requirement To Select, Design, And Construct One Or Two New Dry Rooms To Accommodate Existing And New Equipment, Taking Into Account The Dimensions And Location Of The Rooms. Addition Of The Capability Of Formulating, Mixing, Coating And Calendaring Battery Electrodes In Dry Conditions (by Directly Adding These Capabilities On The Equipment Or Re-locating The Equipment In A Dry Room), I. The Incorporation Of Additional Apparatus Into The Existing Apparatus Line Will Facilitate An Expansion Of Its Capabilities. This Will Include The Enhancement Of Existing Functions, Such As The Increase Of Slurry Mixing Capabilities And The Introduction Of Wet And Dry Thickness Measurements. Ii. Addition Of A Cylindrical Cell Fabrication Line, Iii. Addition Of A Solid-state Battery Pouch Cell Fabrication Pilot Line; Iv. Product And Process Development, Equipment Design, Sourcing And Implementation, Facility Operations, As Well As A Vast Network Of Contacts In The Area Of Product Manufacturers, Toll Coaters, Equipment Vendors, And End-product Users. 3. Project Phases And Deliverables: The Mandate Shall Be Sub-divided Into Multiple Phases, Each With Its Set Of Deliverables As Follows: 1. Elaborate Project Guidelines • Review With Nrc Team Via Web-meetings, The Differences And Constraints Between Cell Size Range Flexibility And Process Steps For Solid-state Pouch And Cylindrical Cell Configurations • Elaborate And Document General Product Specs And Dimensions Including Material (mass) Balance • Define Pfd (process Flow Diagram) • Obtain Available Space At Nrc And Transfer To Drawing Format • Design The Preliminary Layout, Fitted To Nrc Building To Optimize Workflow - Block Diagram • Review With Nrc Technical Authority And/or Their Facility Engineering Representative And Obtain Written Approval On Preferred Options. 2. Cell Configuration And Process Review Documentation: A Report Documenting The Review Of Solid-state Pouch And Cylindrical Cell Configurations, Including An Analysis Of Size Flexibility, Process Steps, And Any Identified Constraints. 3. General Product Specifications And Material Balance Report: A Document Outlining The General Product Specifications, Dimensions, And Material (mass) Balance For The Cells. 4. Process Flow Diagram (pfd): A Pfd Representing The Complete Process Flow For The Production Of Both Solid-state Pouch And Cylindrical Cells. 5. Facility Space Drawing: Digital Drawings Of The Available Space Within The Nrc Facility, Reflecting Current Conditions And Layout. 6. Preliminary Layout And Block Diagram: A Preliminary Layout Design Fitted To The Nrc Facility, Provided In Block Diagram Format, To Optimize The Workflow And Accommodate New Equipment. 7. Review Meeting Notes And Written Approval: Documented Feedback And Notes From Review Meetings With Nrc And Their Facility Engineering Representative, Including Written Approval Of The Selected Options For The Facility Expansion 8. Equipment Definition And Vendor Search : • Collaborate With Nrc In The Writing Of Equipment Specifications (statement Of Requirements Sor) Per Nrc Standard Format And Criteria - Major Equipment (20-25x) - Some Individual Machine Specification May Be Combined, If Desired From A Unique Vendor As Directed By The Nrc. • Anode/cathode Mixer - Mixer Technology To Be Specified By Nrc With Collaboration Of Sudano • Anode/cathode Dry Coating • Anode/cathode Slitter • Anode & Cathode Electrode Blanking As Well As Capability Of Handing Solid 9. State Electrodes And/or Separators • Anode & Cathode Second-dry Vacuum Drying Oven(s) • Cylindrical Cell Assembly • Strip Cutting And Tab Welding • Jelly Roll Winding • Bottom Tab Welding • Can Necking • Top Cap Welding • Electrolyte Filling • Can Crimping • Pouch Cell Assembly • Anode Electrode Blanking • Cathode Electrode Blanking • Z-fold Stacking Machine • Tab Welding And Trimming Machine • Pouch Forming Machine • Pouch Side Sealing And Pouch Trimming Machine • Electrolyte Filling And Degassing Machine • Cell Formation And Testing Equipment For Cylindrical Cells • Dry Room And Associated Dehumidification Equipment C/w Controls, Installation, Etc. • Data Acquisition And Analytics Software • Search Qualified Equipment Vendors Based On Requirements • Issue Rfp’s And Obtain Budgetary Pricing For Each Equipment (2-3 Vendors For Each) • Follow-up & Review For Each Vendor Responding To Any Questions From Vendors Or Nrc • The Deliverables For This Section Are As Follows: Vendor Proposal Review Report • A Detailed Report Summarizing The Review Of All Vendor Proposals, Highlighting How Each Proposal Meets Or Deviates From The Sor Specifications. A. Synthesis Of Vendor Quotes • A Comprehensive Comparison Of Vendor Quotes, Including Critical Details Such As Equipment Dimensions, Required Maintenance Work Areas, And Other Key Specifications. B. Preliminary Equipment Layout Drawing • A Preliminary Layout Drawing Showing The Proposed Equipment Placement Within The Facility, Designed To Optimize Workflow And Accommodate Space Requirements. This Must Be Provided For Nrc Review And Approval. C. Mid-term Results Presentation • Presentation Materials Summarizing The Mid-term Results, Including The Synthesized Quotes And Equipment Layout, For Review With Nrc. 5. Final Equipment Selection Summary • A Summary Document Detailing The Final Selections Of The 20-25 Pieces Of Equipment, Including Justifications For Each Choice Based On Nrc’s Input And Requirements. D. Project Execution Cost Estimate • A Detailed Estimate Of The Overall Project Execution Costs, Encompassing Both Equipment Acquisition And Installation Expenses. E. Compilation For Nrc Procurement • An Updated And Complete Compilation Of The Vendor Proposals, Final Equipment Selections, And Cost Estimates, Prepared For Nrc’s Procurement Group To Initiate The Purchasing Process. F. Building Design Coordination Report • A Report Summarizing The Coordination Activities Between The Contractor And Nrc’s Facilities Engineering Group. This Must Include Any Necessary Building Design Adjustments And Input On Solvent Abatement Planning Or Other Facility Needs. G. Equipment Proposals Follow-up & Synthesis • Review All Vendor Proposals • Synthesize Vendor Quotes Including Dimensions And Maintenance Work Area • Provide Preliminary Equipment Layout Drawing For Nrc Feedback And Approval D. Present Results To Nrc (mid-term) Via Web-meeting • Final Selection Process For ~20-25 Pieces • Estimate Overall Project Execution Costs Including Equipment And Installations • Update And Remit Compilation To Nrc For Purchasing Process By Nrc. • Procurement Group • Building Design Coordination For Equipment Needs With Nrc Facilities Manager Engineering Group Or Technical Authority; • Building And Solvent Abatement Planning (if Necessary) As Well As • Execution And Oversight By Others. Sudano Can Assist In Providing Inputs For Others To Determine Need For Any Equipment. The Deliverables For This Section Are As Follows: 1. Vendor Proposal Review Report • A Detailed Report Summarizing The Review Of All Vendor Proposals, Highlighting How Each Proposal Meets Or Deviates From The Sor Specifications. 2. Synthesis Of Vendor Quotes • A Comprehensive Comparison Of Vendor Quotes, Including Critical Details Such As Equipment Dimensions, Required Maintenance Work Areas, And Other Key Specifications. 3. Preliminary Equipment Layout Drawing • A Preliminary Layout Drawing Showing The Proposed Equipment Placement Within The Facility, Designed To Optimize Workflow And Accommodate Space Requirements. This Must Be Provided For Nrc Review And Approval. 4. Mid-term Results Presentation • Presentation Materials Summarizing The Mid-term Results, Including The Synthesized Quotes And Equipment Layout, For Review With Nrc. 5. Final Equipment Selection Summary • A Summary Document Detailing The Final Selections Of The 20-25 Pieces Of Equipment, Including Justifications For Each Choice Based On Nrc’s Input And Requirements. 6. Project Execution Cost Estimate • A Detailed Estimate Of The Overall Project Execution Costs, Encompassing Both Equipment Acquisition And Installation Expenses. 7. Compilation For Nrc Procurement • An Updated And Complete Compilation Of The Vendor Proposals, Final Equipment Selections, And Cost Estimates, Prepared For Nrc’s Procurement Group To Initiate The Purchasing Process. 8. Building Design Coordination Report • A Report Summarizing The Coordination Activities Between The Contractor And Nrc’s Facilities Engineering Group. This Must Include Any Necessary Building Design Adjustments And Input On Solvent Abatement Planning Or Other Facility Needs. 9. Finalize Equipment Selection, Equipment Engineering, Fabrication Follow-up, Factory Acceptance Testing, And Layout Engineering Services 10. Final Compilation Of Equipment Vendors, Price, Lead Times, Etc. 11. Final Equipment Layout 12. Prepare Facility Utilities Matrix (fum) To Provide To Facilities Engineering In Preparation Of Installation And Services Hook-ups • Review Equipment And Tooling Engineering Drawings With Vendors • Be Point Of Contact (poc) For Vendors During Fabrication Process • Prepare Acceptance Checklist Documents And Assist Equipment Factory • Acceptance Testing (fat) – Includes Travel Time For Up To 3 Locations • Update And Remit Document Compilation To Nrc • The Deliverables For This Section Are As Follows: 13. Final Vendor And Equipment Compilation A Detailed Compilation Of The Final Vendor Selections, Including Pricing, Lead Times, And Other Relevant Procurement Information. 14. Finalized Equipment Layout The Final, Approved Layout Of The Equipment Within The Facility, Designed To Maximize Workflow Efficiency And Compatibility With Existing Infrastructure. 15. Facility Utilities Matrix (fum) • A Complete Fum Document That Outlines The Utilities Required For All Selected Equipment. This Will Guide Nrc’s Facilities Engineering Team In Preparing Installation And Services Hook-ups. 16. Reviewed Engineering Drawings • Validated Engineering Drawings For Each Piece Of Equipment And Tooling, Ensuring Compliance With Specifications And Compatibility With The Facility’s Layout And Utilities. 5. Factory Acceptance Testing (fat) Checklist • An Acceptance Checklist Document For Use During Fat, Detailing The Criteria For Evaluating Equipment Performance And Compliance With Specifications. 6. Updated Documentation Compilation •a Complete And Updated Compilation Of All Documentation Related To Equipment Selection, Fabrication Follow-up, Fat Results, And Engineering Data, Remitted To Nrc For Their Records. 7. Equipment Implementation & Start-up • Plan For Equipment Installation – Installation And Supervision By Others • Provide Equipment Shipping Support To Nrc • Be Poc For Vendors During Equipment Installation, Start-up And Commissioning. Be Support For Nrc In-house Engineering Personnel. • Prepare Acceptance Checklist Documents And Assist Equipment Site • Acceptance Testing (sat) • Provide Final Sign-off On Fabrication Equipment • Provide Industry Standard Coaching To Nrc Personnel On Equipment Operating Modes And Typical Parameters. Equipment Operation Training To Be Provided By Equipment Vendors. The Deliverables For This Section Are As Follows: 1. Equipment Installation Plan A Detailed Plan For The Equipment Installation, Outlining The Steps Required For Successful Installation And Start-up, And Coordinating With The Supervising Parties. 2. Equipment Shipping Support Report Documentation Of The Contractor’s Role In Coordinating Equipment Shipping, Ensuring All Logistics Were Handled And Equipment Arrived As Scheduled. 3. Vendor Coordination Report A Summary Of The Contractor’s Coordination Efforts With Vendors During The Installation, Start-up, And Commissioning Phases, Including Any Key Interactions Or Resolutions Of Technical Issues. 4. Site Acceptance Testing (sat) Checklist Sat Checklist Documents Detailing The Performance Criteria Used During Testing. These Will Serve As The Basis For Determining If The Equipment Meets All Operational Requirements. 5. Sat Participation Report If Requested, A Report Summarizing The Contractor’s Participation In The Sat Process, Including Observations And Recommendations From The On-site Testing. Travel Expenses Must Be Reported Separately If Applicable. 6. Final Equipment Sign-off Document A Formal Sign-off Document Certifying That The Equipment Has Been Installed, Tested, And Is Ready For Use, Based On The Results Of The Sat Process. 7. Coaching And Support Report A Report Documenting The Coaching And Support Provided To Nrc Personnel, Detailing The Key Operating Modes, Parameters, And Industry-standard Practices Shared With The Team. 4. Criteria For Assessment Of The Statement Of Capabilities (minimum Essential Requirements) Any Supplier Expressing Interest Must Provide A Statement Of Capabilities Demonstrating They Have The Technical Expertise To Carry Out All Aspects Of This Project. 5. Applicability Of The Trade Agreement(s) To The Procurement This Procurement Is Subject To The Following Trade Agreement(s): • Canadian Free Trade Agreement (cfta); • Revised World Trade Organization - Agreement On Government Procurement (wto-agp) • Canada-european Union Comprehensive Economic And Trade Agreement (ceta) • Comprehensive And Progressive Agreement For Trans-pacific Partnership (cptpp) • Canada-chile Free Trade Agreement (ccfta) • Canada-colombia Free Trade Agreement • Canada-honduras Free Trade Agreement • Canada-korea Free Trade Agreement • Canada-panama Free Trade Agreement • Canada-peru Free Trade Agreement (cpfta) • Canada-united Kingdom Trade Continuity Agreement (canada-uk Tca) • Canada-ukraine Free Trade Agreement (cufta) 6. Justification For The Pre-identified Supplier For Technical Reasons, The Proposed Supplier Is The Only Known Company With Significant Experience In Providing Engineering And Consulting Services To The Advanced Battery And Ultracapacitor Industry. This Is Due To An Absence Of Competition With An Equivalent Technical Background. Since 2007, Sudano Has Amassed Experience In A Number Of Areas, Including Product And Process Development, Equipment Design, Procurement And Implementation, And Facility Operations. Additionally, The Company Has Cultivated A Vast Network Of Contacts With Product Manufacturers, Contract Coaters, Equipment Suppliers, And End Product Users. By Leveraging This Experience And Network, Sudano Is Well Positioned To Provide Nrc With The Services They Are Seeking, Namely The Specification, Procurement, And Implementation Of A Cylindrical/pouch Cell Prototyping Fabrication Facility. Sudano Consulting Offers Specialized Consulting Services For The Nrc-boucherville Project, With A Particular Focus On The Design And Implementation Of New Waterless Laboratories, As Well As The Selection And Optimization Of Solid-state And Cylindrical Battery Manufacturing Pilot Lines And Dry Coating Technology. Their Distinctive Positioning Is Predicated On Their Prior Involvement In The Preliminary Design Phase Of This Facility Renewal Project, During Which They Exhibited Unparalleled Expertise. The Team At Sudano Consulting Has A Demonstrated History Of Expertise In The Design Of Dry Rooms, The Processing Of Battery Materials, And The Creation Of Battery Prototypes. Their Contributions To Numerous Conferences And Extensive Publication Record In Scientific Papers And Books Serve To Demonstrate Their Authority In These Areas. This Level Of Expertise Is Indispensable To The Success Of The Project And Is Not Readily Available From Other Vendors. A Comprehensive Understanding Of The Regulatory Framework In Quebec. Due To Its Familiarity With The Specific Building Codes, Electrical Requirements, And Other Regulatory Standards In Quebec, Sudano Consulting Is Able To Ensure Compliance And Reduce The Risk Of Costly Rework Or Delays That Could Result From Non-compliance. This Local Knowledge Is Indispensable For The Successful Implementation Of The Project. In Light Of The Aforementioned Factors, It Is Evident That Sudano Consulting's Distinctive Amalgamation Of Scientific Expertise, Regulatory Insight, Bilingual Proficiency, And Global Industry Experience Renders Them The Sole Viable Source For The Consulting Services Necessitated By The Nrc-boucherville Project. It Is Unlikely That Any Other Provider Could Offer The Same Level Of Service Or Guarantee The Success Of The Project To The Same Extent. 7. Government Contracts Regulations Exception(s) The Following Exception(s) To The Government Contracts Regulations Is (are) Invoked For This Procurement Under Subsection 6(d) - "only One Person Is Capable Of Performing The Work"). 8. Exclusions And/or Limited Tendering Reasons The Following Exclusion(s) And/or Limited Tendering Reasons Are Invoked Under The: A. Canadian Free Trade Agreement (cfta) – Article 513 (1) (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; B. World Trade Organization - Agreement On Government Procurement (wto-agp) – Article Xiii (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; C. Canada-european Union Comprehensive Economic And Trade Agreement (ceta) – Article 19.12 (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; D. Comprehensive And Progressive Agreement For Trans-pacific Partnership (cptpp) – Article 15.10 (2) (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; E. Canada-chile Free Trade Agreement (ccfta) – Article Kbis-16 (2) (c): Necessary To Protect Intellectual Property; F. Canada-colombia Free Trade Agreement – Article 1409 (1) (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; G. Canada-honduras Free Trade Agreement – Article 17.11 (2) (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; H. Canada-korea Free Trade Agreement – Referencing The Wto Protocol Amending The Gpa, Article Xiii (1) (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; I. Canada-panama Free Trade Agreement – Article 16.10 (1) (b) (iii): Because Of The Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; J. Canada-peru Free Trade Agreement (cpfta) – Article 1409 (1) (b) (iii): Due To An Absence Of Competition For Technical Reasons; K. Canada-ukraine Free Trade Agreement (cufta) – Annex 10-6 (2) (a): Any Form Of Preference, Including Set Asides, To Benefit Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises; And L. Canada-united Kingdom Trade Continuity Agreement: Refer To Ceta As The Provisions Of Ceta Are Incorporated By Reference Into And Made Part Of This Agreement. (ceta) Article 19.12 (b) (iii). 9. Ownership Of Intellectual Property It Is Not Anticipated That Any Ip Will Be Generated. Any Foreground Ip That Arises From The Proposed Contract Will Belong To The Contractor. 10. Proposed Contract The Agreement Between Nrc And The Consultant Will Be For A Period Of 36 Months. The National Research Council (nrc) Reserves The Option To Retain The Contractor On An As-needed Basis For Continued Support Beyond The Initial Contract Term. This Support May Include, But Is Not Limited To, Advisory Services, Project Management, And Technical Assistance Related To The Scope Of Work Outlined In This Contract. Extension Of Services: The Nrc May, At Its Sole Discretion, Extend The Contractor’s Engagement For Additional Periods As Needed To Meet Project Requirements Or Organizational Needs. Scope And Terms: Any Additional Services Under This Clause Will Be Defined And Agreed Upon In Writing, With Mutually Acceptable Terms Regarding Scope, Deliverables, Timeline, And Compensation. Termination: The Nrc May Terminate The Extended Engagement At Any Time, Provided Written Notice Is Given To The Contractor As Stipulated In The Original Contract Terms. This Clause Does Not Obligate The Nrc To Extend Services But Provides The Option To Do So, Ensuring Flexibility For Continued Support As Required. 11. Name And Address Of The Pre-identified Supplier Sudano Consulting 3928 Joachim Du Bellay Laval, Quebec, Can, H7p 0a2 Tel: +1 (514) 235-4646 Tel: +1 (514) 235-4646 E-mail: Info@sudanoconsulting.com Www.sudanoconsulting.com 12. Suppliers' Right To Submit A Statement Of Capabilities Suppliers Who Consider Themselves Fully Qualified And Available To Provide The Goods, Services Or Construction Services Described In The Acan May Submit A Statement Of Capabilities In Writing To The Contact Person Identified In This Notice On Or Before The Closing Date Of This Notice. The Statement Of Capabilities Must Clearly Demonstrate How The Supplier Meets The Advertised Requirements. 13. Closing Date For A Submission Of A Statement Of Capabilities The Closing Date And Time For Accepting Statements Of Capabilities Is November 22th 2024, 2pm Eastern Time.

Description: Item Unique Identification And Valuation (jan 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| inspection Of Supplies--fixed-price (aug 1996)|2||| inspection And Acceptance - Short Version|8|x||x|||||| stop-work Order (aug 1989)|1|| general Information-fob-destination|1|b| wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (jan 2023)|16|invoice And Receiving Reports (combo)|n/a|tbd|n00104|tbd|tbd|see Schedule |tbd|n/a|n/a|n/a|||||| inspection System Program Plans, Or Premanufacturing Or Test Procedures|1|45| federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act Orders-prohibition (dec 2023)|12||||||||||||| alternate A, Annual Representations And Certifications (oct 2024)|13|||||||||||||| buy American-balance Of Payments Program Certificate-basic (feb 2024)|1|| annual Representations And Certifications (may 2024)|13|334513|750|||||||||||| notice Of Priority Rating For National Defense, Emergency Perpardeness, And Enrgy Progam Use (april 2008))|2||x| unless Otherwise Specified, Pricing For This Quotation Is Valid For 60 Days After The Closing Date As Indicated On The Quotation. please Specify (if Other Than 60 Days) ______________ Days.if You Are Submitting Your Quote Via Email Or Neco,please Specify The Number Of Days Pricing Is Valid. a Material Irpod Is Available At The Bpmi Website. all Contractual Documents (i.e. Contracts, Purchase Orders, Task Orders,delivery Orders And Modifications) Related To The Instant Procurement Areconsidered To Be 'issued' By The Government When Copies Are Either Deposited In The Mail, Transmitted By Facsimile, Or sent By Other Electronic Commercemethods, Such As Email. The Government's Acceptance Of The Contractor'sproposal Constitutes Bilateral Agreement To 'issue' Contractual Documents As Detailed Herein. \ 1. Scope 1.1 In The Event Of A Conflict Between Section "c" And Section "d" Of The Contract/purchase Order, Section "c" Will Take Precedence. 2. Applicable Documents 2.1 Applicable Documents; technical Documents Associated To This Solicitation Or Award Such As; Irpod, Drawings,technical Data, Strs, As Well As Certain Military Specifications, And Commercial Item Descriptions (cid) Etc. May Be Obtained At (https://logistics.unnpp.gov/ecommerce) These Documents, At The Required Revision Levels That Are Associated To Either This Solicitation Or Award, Become A Part Of This Solicitation Or Award Unless Changed By An Admendment To The Solicitation Or Modification To the Award. this Website Requires A Password And Pre-registration. To Obtain Instruction On How To Register And Obtain A Password Contact The Bpmi Website Administrator. 3. Requirements 3.1 Navsup Wss-mech Code N94 Additional Technical Documentation order Of Precedence And Effective Issues Of Cited Documentation Dated: July 2004 a. Order Of Precedence For Document Conflict Resolution: The Technical And Quality Requirements Applicable To Manufacture Of The Material Being Purchased Under This Order Are Contained Or Invoked In One Or More Of The Documents Listed Below. In The Event Of any Inconsistencies Between Any Provisions Of This Order, The Order Or Precedence Shall Be As Follows: 1. Amendments To The Purchase Order/contract 2. Schedule Of Supplies Of The Purchase Order/contract. 3. Terms And Conditions Of The Purchase Order/contract. 4. Individual Repair Part Ordering Data (irpod); Or Master Procurement Specification, As Applicable. 5. Any Invoked Standard Technical Requirements (strs). 6. Drawings Referenced In The Irpod, Or Master Procurement Specification , As Applicable. 7. Specifications Referenced In The Irpod, Master Procurement Specifications Or Drawing(s), As Applicable. b. Effective Issues Of Cited Drawings, Specifications, Standards And Other Documents: 1. The Contractor Shall Comply With The Specified Revisions Of The Documents (i.e. Drawings,specifications,standards And Other Documents) Cited In The Irpod And/or Procurement Specification Contained Herein. The Contractor Shall Obtain Written Approval for The Contracting Officer To Use Document Revisions Other Than Those Specified. When A Later Drawing Revision Is Submitted For Approval, Two Full Size Clear Legible Prints Shall Be Provided. 2. Where Documents Are Referred To Only By The Basic Identification Name Or Number And No Specific Revision Thereto, The Contractor Use Of Any Issue Of The Document Except All Such Revisions Shall Be Dated 1 November 1969 Or Later. c. Use Of Document Revisions In Their Entirety: 1. Contractors Shall Use Revisions To Each Cited Or Referenced Document In Its Entirety Unless The Contractor Obtains Contracting Officer Approval To Do Otherwise (i.e. The Contractor Shall Not Use Portions Of Different Revisions Of A Document). d. Vendor Waiver/deviations On Critical Contracts. 1. Compliance With The Delivery Date And Technical Requirements Of Navsup Wss Critical Repair Part Material Contracts Is Expected. 2. As The Cautionary Note Contained In The Contract States, Seller Intended Use Of Any Material Which Is Not In Full Compliance With The Specified Contract Technical Requirements, Should Be Identified As An Exception In Advance Either At The Time The Quotation is Submitted Or Prior To Manufacture. 3. Requests For Delivery Date Extensions And Waivers/deviations Should Be Accompanied By An Explanation Of The Cause For The Delay, Or The Reason For The Requested Non-conformance With An Offer Of Consideration In The Event The Contracting Officer Concurs With your Request. 4. Requests For Waivers/deviations Should Provide Justification For The Requested Change Including An Evaluation Which Demonstrates That Proposed Non-conformance Will Not Affect The Quality, Form, Fit, Or Function Of The Part. Where A Proposed Alternate Or replacement Item Is Offered, Supporting Technical Data (catalog Page, Drawing (s), Etc.) That Fully Describe The Proposed Item Shall Be Provided For Technical Evaluation. 5. Requests Which Do Not Contain The Above Information Will Be Returned And Will Not Be Submitted To Technical/engineering Review Until Sufficient Justification Is Provided. 6. Requests For Waivers/deviations Shall Be Presented To The Government Quality Assurance Representative (qar) For Comment. The Qar Shall Forward The Request, With Their Comments, Directly To The Post Award Pco Identified In The Contract/purchase Order Within five Working Days After Receipt. e. Exclusion Of Mercury 1. Mercury Or Mercury Containing Compounds Shall Not Be Intentionally Added To Or Come In Direct Contact With Hardware Or Supplies Under This Contract. 4. Quality Assurance 4.1 The Quality Assurance Requirements Are Located In The Individual Repair Part Ordering Data (irpod). the Contractor Shall Provide And Maintain An Inspection System Acceptable To The Government Covering The Supplies Herein. records Of All Inspection Work By The Contractor Shall Be Kept Complete And Available To The Government During The Performance Of This Contract And For Such Longer Periods As May Be Specified Elsewhere In The Contract. 5. Packaging 5.1 When The Cleanliness Control Requirements Of One Or More Of The Following Documents Are Invoked: Mil-std-767, Mil-std-2041, Refueling Clean, Or Reactor Plant Clean, The Following Clarification Of Requirements For Mil-prf-23199 Packaging Of Repair Parts applies. (1). The Following Summary Clarifies The Packaging Requirements Of Mil-prf-23199 Pertaining To The Use Of Mil-dtl-24466 Green Poly Bags. The Supplier Remains Responsible For Meeting All Contract Requirements. Suppliers Who Are Unsure Of The Packaging, Packing, and Marking. requirements For A Particular Part Should Request Clarification By Contacting The Navsup-wss Contracting Poc. (a). Paragraph 3.4.2 Of Mil-prf-23199 Discusses Level B Packaging And Refers To Paragraph 3.3.1 For The Method Of Packaging. Paragraph 3.3.1 Provides Several Methods Of Packaging. Packaging In Heat Sealed Envelopes Is Covered In Paragraph 3.3.1.1 Which States, "components Which Are Subject To Cleanliness Controls (see 6.2) Or As Specified (see 6.1) Shall Be Packaged In Heat Sealed Envelopes (see 3.2.2.5 And 3.2.2.5.1)". (2). The Following Conditions Must Be Satisfied In Order For Mil-dtl-24466 Bags To Apply: (a). Paragraph 6.2 Of Mil-prf-23199 Defines Cleanliness Controls As Any Reference To (or Application Of) The Cleanliness Control Requirements Of One Or More Of The Following Documents: Mil-std-767, Mil-std-2041, Refueling Clean, Reactor Plant Clean, Or Other requirements Identified Within The Irpod. the Repair Part Must Have Cleaning Requirements Of One Of The Aformentioned Methods. (b). Paragraph 6.1 Contains Ordering Data Options. Paragraph 6.1(k)2. Provides An Option To Specify The Method Of Packaging To Be Used When Packaging Is Other Than In Accordance With Paragraph 3.3.1.1 Only. If A Contract Specifies Any Additional Requirements for The Use Of Green Poly Bags, Then They Are Required And Take Precedence. (4). The Use Of Fire Retardant Packaging Material Is No Longer Required In Any Navsup-wss N94 Contract. mil-std 2073 Packaging Applies As Found Elsewhere In The Schedule 6. Notes 6.1 1. Nuclear Reactor Publications Assigned Navsea Document And Identification Numbers That Are Not Available From Bpmi E-commerce Web Site Must Be Requested From: contracting Officer navsup Wss-mech code N943 5450 Carlisle Pike p.o. Box 2020 mechanicsburg, Pa. 17055-0788 requests For "official Use Only" And "noforn" (not Releasable To Foreign Natio Nals) Documents Must Identify The Quotation Number On Pre-award Procurement Actions. Requests Must Be Submitted To The Pco For Certification Of "need-to-know" For The Document. On post-award Actions, The Request Must Identify The Government Contract Number, And Be Submitted Via The Defense Contract Management Agency (dcma) For Certification Of "need-to-know" For The Document. 2. Commercial Specifications, Standards And Descriptions - These Specifications, Standards And Descriptions Are Not Available From Government Sources. They May Be Obtained From The Publishers Or Societies Of The Applicable Documents. 6.2 In Accordance With Dodi 5230.24 All Documents And Drawings Provided By The U.s. Navy To Prospective Contractors Must Include A "distribution Statement" To Inform The Contractor Of The Limits Of Distribution, And The Safeguarding Of The Information contained On Those Documents And Drawings. There Are 6 (six) Separate Distribution Statement Codes Used For Non-classified Documents And Drawings. The Definition For Each Is As Follows: a... Approved For Public Release; Distribution Is Unlimited. b... Distribution Authorized To Us Governments Agencies Only. c... Distribution Authorized To Us Government Agencies And Their Contractors. d... Distribution Authorized To Dod And Dod Contractors Only. e... Distribution Authorized To Dod Components Only. f... Further Distribution Only As Directed By Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command, Code 09t. 6.3 Information Regarding Abbreviations, Symbols And Codes Appearing On Dd Form 1423 - The Following Information Is Provided To Assist In Understanding The Intent Of The Requirement To Provide A Deliverable Item To The Government. The Explanation Of abbreviation, Symbols And Codes Found In A Block Follows The Block Number As They Appear On The Dd Form 1423. block A: Is The Actual Contract Line Item No. block B: Is The Actual Collective Physical List Of The Deliverable Item(s) Which Are Part Of The Total Requirement Of The Contract/purchase Order. block C: Is The Category Of Data Required, Tdp Is Defined In Mil-t-31000. Tm Is Defined In Part 1x, Section B Of Dodi 5000.2. Navsup-wss Has Reasoned That Most Dd Form 1423's Included In Our Solicitations Meet The Requirement Of Tdp As Navsup-wss Does Not Regularly Purchase Only Technical Manuals Without Purchasing Hardware And Related Tdp Software. Therefore, Most Navsup-wss Dd Form 1423 Category Code Will Be Tdp. block D: Is The Name Of The Parent System, Next Higher Assembly, Or The Item Being Purchased. block E: Is The Purchase Request Number, Request For Proposal Number, Invitation For Bid Number Or Another Number For Tracking And Monitoring Purposes. block F: Is The Successful Offerors Name And Or Cage Code. block G: Is The Name Of The Individual And Or The Code/activity Of The Individual Who Prepared The Dd Form 1423 And Included The Requirement In The Technical Data Package (tdp). block H: Self Explanatory. block I: Is The Name And Signature Of The Individual Who Approved The Content And The Need For Inclusion Of The Dd Form 1423 In The Tdp. block J: Self Explanatory. block 1: Is The Exhibit Line Item Number (elin). block 2: Is The Title Of The Data Item Cited In Block 4. block 3: Is The Subtitle Of The Data Item Cited In Block 4 And Is Used If The Title Requires Clarification. block 4: Is The Actual Data Item Description (did) Number Or The Actual Technical Manual Contract Requirements Number. In The Event The Dd Form 1423 Is Requiring A Technical Manual The Numbered Tmcr Will Be An Attachment To The Contract/purchase Order. block 5: Is The Section And Paragraph Area, Where The Requirement Statement For The Dd Form 1423 Will Be Found. block 6: Is The Activity That Will Inform The Contractor Of Approval, Conditional Approval Or Disapproval Of The Deliverable Item. block 7: Is A Code Which Designates Authority For Inspection And Acceptance Of The Deliverable Item. The Definition Of The Codes Is As Follows: Dd Form 250 Code Inspection Acceptance Ss (1) (2) Dd (3) (4) Sd (1) (4) Ds (3) (5) Lt (6) (7) No (8) (8) Xx (9) (9) (1) Inspection At Source. (2) Acceptance At Source. (3) No Inspection Performed At Source. Final Inspection Performance At Destination. (4) Acceptance At Destination. (5) Acceptance At Source. Acceptance Based On Written Approval From The Contract Officer. (6) Letter Of Transmittal Only. Lt Should Not Be Used When Inspection Is Required. The Data Is Sent By The Contractor Directly To The Personnel Listed In Block 14 Of The Dd Form 1423. Lt Is Used When The Contracting Agency Does Not Desire To Have A Dd Form 250 For Each And Every Piece Of Data Developed By The Contractor. The Only Other Authorized Use Of Lt Is The Special Case Where The Contracting Agency Does Not Desire To Have Separate Dd Forms 250 But Desires To Have A Government Quality Assurance Representative Perform Inspection. The Government Quality Assurance Representative Shall Be Listed On The Distribution In Block 14 And Requested To Provide Comments Via The Quality Assurance Letter Of Inspection. Use Of The Symbol Lt Is Not Authorized For Data Comprising Final Delivery Of Technical Data Package Of For Technical Manuals. (lt May, However, Be Used For Delivery Of Preliminary Tdp's Or Tm's). (7) As Specified In Block 8 Of The Dd Form 1423. (8) No Inspection Or Acceptance Required. No Dd Form 250 Or Letter Of Transmittal Required. Use Of The Symbol No Is Not Authorized For Data Comprising Technical Data Packages Or For Technical Manuals. (9) Inspection And Acceptance Requirements Specified Elsewhere In The Contract. block 8: Is The Approval Code - Items Of Critical Data Requiring Specific Advanced Written Approval Prior To Distribution Of The Final Data Item Will Be Identified By Placing An "a" In This Field. This Data Item Requires Submission Of A Preliminary Draft Prior To Publication Of A Final Document. When A Preliminary Draft Is Required, Block 16 Of The Dd Form 1423 Will Show Length Of Time Required For Government Approval/disapproval And Subsequent Turn-around Time For The Contractor To Resubmit The Data After Government Approval/disapproval Has Been Issued. Block 16 Will Also Indicate The Extent Of The Approval Requirements, E.g., Approval Of Technical Content And/or Format. block 9: Is The Distribution Statement Code Which Explains How The Government Can Circulate The Deliverable Item. The Definition Of Codes A, B, C, D, E, Or F Is As Follows: A. Distribution Of The Item Is Unrestricted. B. Distribution Of The Item Is Limited To Agencies Only. C. Distribution Of The Item Is Limited To Contractors With A Cage Code And Have A Dd Form 2345 On File With The Dla Logistics Information Services (dlis) Battle Creek, Mich. Or Government Activities. D. Distribution Of The Item Is Limited To Dod Activities And Dod Contractors Only. E. Distribution Of The Item Is Limited To Dod Components Only. F. Distribution Of The Item Is Restricted From Foreign Nations And Foreign Nationals. block 10: Is The Frequency Which The Deliverable Item Is Expected To Be Delivered To The Government. The Abbreviations And Their Meaning. Annly Annually Asgen As Generated Asreq As Required Bi-mo Every Two Months Bi-we Every Two Weeks Daily Daily Dfdel Deferred Delivery Mthly Monthly One/r One Time With Revisions Qrtly Quarterly Semia Every Six Months Wekly Weekly Xtime Number Of Times To Be Submitted (1time, 2times...9times) Use Of These Codes Requires Further Explanation In Block 16 To Provide The Contractor With Guidance Necessary To Accurately Price The Deliverable Data Item. Other Abbreviations Not Appearing On The Above List May On Occasion Be Used In Block 10 Of The Dd Form 1423. When Other Abbreviations Are Used They Will Be Fully Explained In Block 16 Of The Dd Form 1423. block 11: Is The Last Calendar Date, Expressed In Year/month/day Format, The Deliverable Item Is To Be Received By The Requiring Office Cited In Block 6 Of The Dd Form 1423 For An Item With A Block 10 Entry Indication A Single Delivery. If The Item Is To Be Submitted Multiple Times, The Number Stated Is The Number Of Calendar Days After The Frequency Cited In Block 10 The Item Is To Be Received By The Requiring Office Cited In Block 6 Of The Dd Form 1423. On Occasion The Deliverable Item Will Be Required To Be Submitted Prior To The End Of The Frequency Cited In Block 6. In That Event The Requirement Will Be Fully Explained In Block 16 Of The Dd Form 1423. block 12: Is The Date Of First Submission Of The Deliverable Item To The Requiring Office (block 4) Expressed In Year/month/day Format. The Abbreviations And Their Meaning Are As Follows: Asgen As Generated Asreq As Required Dac Days After Contract Date Dfdel Deferred Delivery Eoc End Of Contract Eom End Of Month Eoq End Of Quarter Specific Instructions For These Requirements Will Be Provided In Block 16. If The Deliverable Item Is Constrained By A Specific Event Or Milestone The Constraint Will Be Fully Explained In Block 16 Of The Dd Form 1423. "as Generated", "as Required", And "deferred Delivery" Will Always Be Fully Explained In Block 16. block 13: Is The Date Of Subsequent Submission Of The Deliverable Item, After The Initial Submission. Subsequent Submission Is Only Used To Indicate The Specific Time Period. The Data Is Required When Block 10 Of The Dd Form 1423 Indicates Multiple Delivery Is Required. This Does Not Apply To Resubmission Of A Deliverable Item That Has Been Reviewed By The Requiring Office And Determined To Be Only Conditionally Acceptable Or Unacceptable. block 14a: Will Contain The Activity Name(s) Where The Deliverable Item Is To Be Sent. If The Activity Is Other Than Dcma Or Navsup-wss The Full Name, Address (including Code) Will Be Specified. That Specific Information Will Be Located In Block 16 Of The Dd Form 1423. block 14b: Is The Number Of Copies Of Draft And Or Final Copies To Be Submitted. When Final "repro" Copies Are To Be Submitted Block 16 Will Clarify The Type Of Repro Copies Required. (e.g., Vellum, Negative, Etc.) block 15: Is The Total Of Each Type Of Copies To Be Submitted As Required By Block 14. block 16: Is The Block Used To Provide Additional Or Clarifying Information Blocks 1 Through 15. This Block Is Also The Only Area Used To Tailor The Document Listed In Block 4. Only Deletions To The Minimum Requirements Stated In The Document In Block 4 Are Allowed. Block 16 May Also Be Used To Specify The Medium For Delivery Of The Data. block 17: Is The Block Where The Bidder Or Offeror Is To Enter The Appropriate Price Group. The Price Groups Are Defined As Follows: A. Group I - Data Which The Contractor Prepares To Satisfy The Government's Requirements. The Contractor Does Not Need This Type Of Data To Perform The Rest Of The Contract. Price Would Be Based On Identifiable Direct Costs, Overhead, General And Administrative (g&a) And Profit. B. Group Ii - Data Essential To Contract Performance Which Must Be Reworked Or Amended To Conform To Government Requirements. The Price For Data In This Group Would Be Based On The Direct Cost To Convert The Original Data To Meet Government Needs And To Deliver It, Plus Allocable Overhead, G&a And Profit. C. Group Iii - Data Which The Contractor Must Develop For His Own Use And Which Requires No Substantial Change To Conform To Government Requirements Regarding Depth Of Content, Format, Frequency Of Submittal, Preparation, And Quality Of Data. Only The Costs Of Reproducing, Handling And Delivery, Plus Overhead, G&a And Profit, Are Considered In Pricing Data In This Group. D. Group Iv - Data Which The Contractor Has Developed As Part Of His Commercial Business. Not Much Of This Data Is Required And The Cost Is Insignificant. The Item Should Normally Be Coded "no Charge." An Example Is A Brochure Or Brief Manual Developed For Commercial Application Which Will Be Acquired In Small Quantities, And The Added Cost Is Too Small To Justify The Expense Of Computing The Charge That Otherwise Would Go With The Acquisition. block 18: Enter The Total Estimated Price Equal To That Portion Of The Total Price Which Is Estimated To Be Attributable To The Production Or Development For The Government Of That Item Of Data. The Entry "n/c" For "no Charge" Is Acceptable. the Packaging Label Shall Be Marked With The Nomenclature Cited On The Irpod. date Of First Submission=eoc submit At The Time Of Material Delivery A Certificate Of Compliance Per Di-misc-81356 To Navsup-wss Code N9433. A Separate Certificate Of Compliance Shall Be Prepared And Submitted For Each Unique Combination Of Contract/purchase Order Number, National Stock number And Item Nomenclature Specified In The Schedule Of Supply/services. di-misc-a81356 Cited In Block 4 Is A Unique Navsup-wss Dd1423 Sequence Control number - Certification Package To Be Iaw Did Di-misc-81356(latest Rev). date Of First Submission=045 Dac submit For Approval One Package (iaw Di-qcic-8871) Of All Applicable Procedure, Drawing And Other Pre-manufacturing Submittals, Listed On The Individual Repair Part Ordering Data (irpod) Document(s) And Detailed In The Cited Specification, Within 45 Days After contract Award To The Contracting Officer (navsup-wss Code N9433). See Irpod For Individual Documents Required. a Separate Package Will Be Prepared And Submitted For Each Unique Combination Of Contract Number, National Stock Number, And Item Nomenclature Specified In The Schedule Of Supplies/services. di-qcic-a8871 Cited In Block 4 Is A Unique Navsup-wss Dd1423 Sequence Control Number - Procedure Package To Be Iaw Did Di-qcic-8871(latest Rev).

Details: This Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualifications Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder/plan Holder List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse, Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. 1. General Information veterans Health Administration (vha) Program Contracting Activity Central (pcac) Is Seeking Sources And Intends To Award A Firm Fixed Price Design Contract For Architect-engineering (a-e) Services For The Development Of Complete Construction Documents, Which Include Working Drawings, Specifications, And Reports, And Construction Period Services For Project #652-327 Construct Veteran Whole Health Community Gathering Center In Richmond, Va. The A-e Services Contract That Is Anticipated To Be Awarded Will Be Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Statute [formerly Known As The Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36.6 Architectural And Engineering Services, Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 836.6, And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) M836.6 Architect-engineer Services. In Accordance With Far 36.209, Construction Contracts With Architect-engineer Firms, No Contract For The Construction Of A Project Shall Be Awarded To The Firm That Designed The Project Or Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, Except With The Approval Of The Head Of The Agency Or Authorized Representative. 2. Project Information this Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541310 Architectural Services And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $12.5m. A Full Design Team Is Required To Complete This Project. The Va Expects To Award The Anticipated A-e Contract By Late March 2025. the Anticipated Period Of Performance For Completion Of Design Is 175 Calendar Days After Notice Of Award (noa). The Vaar Magnitude Of Construction Is Between $1,000,000 And $2,000,000. Please Note That The 175 Calendar-day Period Of Performance For The Design Completion Begins With The Issuance Of The Noa And That A Notice To Proceed (ntp) Will Not Be Issued For The Completion Of A Design Project. 3. A-e Selection Process firms Submitting Sf 330s In Response To This Announcement, Not Later Than The Closing Date And Time Specified Herein And In Accordance With Submission Requirements, Will Be Considered For Evaluation. The Selection Will Be Made As Follows: sf 330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Primary Selection Criteria As Stated In This Pre-solicitation Notice. These Evaluations Will Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms For This Particular Requirement. In Accordance With Far 36.602-3(c), At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Then Be Notified Of The Government S Intent To Hold Discussions. All Firms Not Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified At This Time. In Accordance With Far 36.607(b), Any Requested Debriefings Of Successful And Unsuccessful Firms Will Be Held After Final Selection Has Taken Place And Will Be Conducted, To The Extent Practicable, In Accordance With 15.503, 15.506(b) Through (f), And 15.507(c). Note That 15.506(d)(2) Through (d)(5) Do Not Apply To Architect-engineer Contracts. discussions Will Be Held With The Most Highly Qualified Firms In The Form Of Written Responses. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Email And Provided Further Instructions, Including Any Questions Or Topics To Address. Following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Based On The Primary And (if Necessary) Secondary Selection Criteria. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Sf 330 Submission For Each Firm, As Well As Additional Information Obtained Via Discussions. The Highest Rated Firm Will Be Selected To Receive The Solicitation And Engage In Negotiations. the Solicitation Will Be Issued To The Highest Rated Firm As A Request For Fee Proposal (rfp). All Sow Attachments And Site-specific Documentation Will Be Provided To The Highest Rated Firm With The Rfp. A Site Visit Will Be Authorized During The Negotiation Process. An Award Will Then Be Made As Long As The Negotiation Of Rates And Hours Leads To A Fair And Reasonable Determination Of The Final Contract Price. If Negotiations With The Highest Rated Firm Are Unsuccessful, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until Award Can Be Made. 4. Selection Criteria: firms Responding To This Notice Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Using The Primary And Secondary Selection Criteria Listed Below. The Factors Are Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. The Evaluation Will Consider How Each Factor Is Addressed And How It Is Formatted To Coincide With The Selection Criteria. primary Selection Criteria: professional Qualifications (sections C-e): Professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service. The A-e Shall: provide Brief (single Page) Resumes Of Proposed Team Members Who Will Specifically Serve As The Project Managers And Designers Of Record. The Designers Of Record Shall Perform And Direct The Design Within Their Respective Discipline And Shall Sign And Seal The Drawings. all Designers Of Record Must Be Professionally Registered In Their Discipline. each Resume Shall Include A Minimum Of Two (2) But No More Than Five (5) Specific Completed Projects That Best Illustrate The Individual Team Members Experience Relevant To This Contract Scope. each Resume Shall Demonstrate Each Team Member S Years Of Professional Experience And Years With The Current Firm. Team Members Are Required To Have At Least 5 Years Of Professional Experience And At Least 5 Years With Their Current Firm. a Resume For Each Of These Key Positions Must Be Provided In Section E Of The Sf330. Key Positions And Disciplines Required For This Project Include, But Are Not Limited To: architect registered Communications Distribution Designer (rcdd) cost Estimator civil Engineer electrical Engineer fire Protection Engineer industrial Hygienist mechanical Engineer plumbing Engineer project Manager structural Engineer offeror Must Include The Following Statement Of Sdvosb Compliance When Submitting The Personnel Proposed To Perform The Work Under This Requirement: I [signatory Authority] ___________________, [company] __________________, Certify That The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance To Firms That Are Not Certified Sdvosbs By The Small Business Association S Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) In Compliance Of Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 852.219-75. the Information Provided In Sections C Through E Of The Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate This Factor. Do Not Include This Information In Section H Unless It Is Pertinent To Support The Information Listed In The Other Sections. specialized Experience And Technical Competence (sections F-h): this Factor Evaluates The Specialized Experience And Technical Competence That The Firm Has With Projects Comparable To This Requirement. provide Proof Of Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required, Specifically Stand-alone Outpatient Clinic Buildings. The A/e Must Provide Evidence Of Understanding The Project; And Any Unique Architectural/engineering Aspects Associated With The Proposed Project And How To Address Them. provide A Maximum Of 5 Substantially Completed Projects (completed Through 100% Construction) Of Comparable Scope And Size To This Project. The Information Provided For Each Project Shall Include At A Minimum, Project Number, Project Title, Detailed Description Of Project Scope, Project Owner Contact Information, Project Cost, Period Of Performance And List Of Aspects That Are Similar To This Project. the A/e Firm Shall Provide A Table Of The Comparable Projects Listed Above Comparing Their Ige With The Bid/award Amount During Construction. the A/e Firm Shall Provide A Table Indicating Participation Of The Proposed Team Members With The Comparable Projects Listed Above. capacity (section H): this Factor Evaluates The Ability Of The Firm And The Firm S Subcontractors, Given Their Current Projected Workload (percentage) And The Availability Of Their Key Personnel, To Accomplish The Possible Myriad Of Design Projects In The Required Time. The General Workload And Staffing Capacity Of The Design Office Will Be Evaluated. list Current Projects With A Design Fee Of Greater Than $20,000 Being Designed In The Firms Office. indicate The Firms Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Sub-consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period; describe Experience In Successfully Delivering Projects Per Performance Schedule, Providing Timely Construction Support, And Successfully Completing Multiple Projects With Similar Delivery Dates. volume Of Va Contract Awards In The Last 12 Months. past Performance (section H): the Contractor Shall Provide Complete Past Performance Documentation For All Projects With Government Agencies And Private Industry Provided In Criteria 2. These Past Performance Documents Shall Reflect/speak To The Contractors Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules In A Hospital Setting. the Contractor Shall Submit Performance References For The Projects Listed In Criteria 2. interested Firms May Submit The Most Recent Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (cpars) Performance Report Or A Past Performance Questionnaire For Each Individual Project. Do Not Submit A Ppq When A Completed Cpars Report Is Available. if Submitting A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Evaluation: use The Provided Ppq Form As Attachment C. ensure The Correct Phone Numbers And Email Addresses Are Provided For Each Contract Customer/reference. if A Ppq Is Submitted But An Official Cpars Evaluation Is Found For That Project, The Official Evaluation Takes Precedence. past Performance Will Be Evaluated On Its Relevance And Recency. Relevance Is Defined As Performance Of Work On Projects That Are Similar In Scope To The Type Of Project Anticipated Under The Resultant Contract. For The Purposes Of This Pre-solicitation Notice, Recency Is Defined As Performance Occurring Beginning No Earlier Than May 2019 And Completing No Later Than May 2024. knowledge Of Locality (section H): Knowledge Of The Locality, To Include Specific Knowledge Of Certain Local Conditions Or Project Site Features, Such As geological Features climatic Conditions working With And Local Construction Methods or Local Laws And Regulations the Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf330. Note That The Intent Of This Factor Is To Showcase A Firm S Understanding Of The Site And Locality, And Not Where The Firm Is Located And How They Would Travel To The Site. Information Related To The Firm S Location, Shall Be Provided In Section H, Under Secondary Selection Criteria Factor 1. construction Period Services (section H): Experience In Construction Period Services Must Be Demonstrated Via Project Experience. These May Be The Same Projects Identified Above In Section F; However, The Firm Shall Clearly Delineate The Types Of Construction Period Services Performed For Each. Refer To The Statement Of Work For Review Timeline Expectations. Project Descriptions Must Include Experience With: professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period review Of Construction Submittals support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work, And Cost Estimates Shall Be Included As An Evaluation Criterion When Construction Period Services Is Included In The Statement Of Work For A-e Services coordination With Commissioning Requirements attendance At Weekly Conference Calls providing Minutes Of Meetings Between The Ae, Va, And Contractors pre-final Inspection Site Visits generation Of Punch-list Reports, And production Of As-built Documentation. the Information For This Factor Must Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. secondary Selection Criterion*: geographic Location. Geographic Location. Location Of The Firm, As Measured By The Driving Distance (miles) Between The Offeror S Principal Business Location And The Project Site Located At 1201 Brock Rock Blvd. Richmond, Va 23249. Determination Of The Mileage Will Be Based On Google Maps (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/). *the Secondary Selection Criterion Is Used As A Tiebreaker, If Necessary, In Ranking The Most Highly Qualified Firms Following The Completion Of Discussions. The Secondary Selection Criterion Will Not Be Applied When Determining A Firm S Sf 330 Submission Highly Qualified Or Not Highly Qualified. 5. Submission Requirements: the Below Information Contains The Instructions And Format That Must Be Followed For The Submission Of The Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications: submit One (1) Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications To Contract Specialist Tessia Hall At Tessia.hall@va.gov. This Must Include Parts I And Ii And Any Applicable Attachments. the Submission Must Include The Sf 330, Architect-engineer Qualifications (form Is Available Online At Https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms/architectengineer-qualifications). the Sf 330 Submission Is Due By 10:00 Am Et On November 26, 2024. the Sf 330 Must Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted. the Subject Line Of The Email Must Read: Sf 330 Submission - 36c77625r0011 Construct Veteran Whole Health Community Gathering Center Richmond Va . the Sf 330 Submission Must Not Exceed A Total Of 50 Pages. This Includes Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information. Any Pages Submitted By An Offeror That Exceed The Limit Will Not Be Considered During The Evaluation. Each Page Must Be In Arial Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. Part Ii Of The Sf 330 And Any Cpars Or Ppqs Will Not Count Toward The Page Limitation. a Ppq Obtained For Another Sf 330 Submission May Be Submitted For This Project. However, If Significant Portions Of The Project Have Been Completed Since The Ppq Was Filled Out, A New Ppq Should Be Submitted To Accurately Assess The Project. firms Must Include The Following Information In Section B Of The Sf 330 Submission: 1) Sam Unique Entity Identifier 2) Tax Id Number 3) Cage Code 4) Primary Point Of Contact S Email Address And Phone Number all Questions Must Be Submitted To Tessia.hall@va.gov With The Subject Line Sf 330 Questions - 36c77625r0011 Construct Veteran Whole Health Community Gathering Center Richmond Va. The Cutoff For Question Submission Is 10:00 Am Et On November 4, 2024. Questions Will Be Answered Through Modification To The Pre-sol Notice Posted To Contract Opportunities At Sam.gov. this Procurement Is A 100% Set-aside For Sdvosb Concerns. Offers Received From Other Than Sdvosbs Will Not Be Considered. Offerors Must Be Certified As Sdvosbs By The U.s. Small Business Administration (sba) And Visible In The Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/) At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Responses, And Award. Failure To Be Certified In The Vetcert Database At These Times Will Result In The Offeror Being Deemed Ineligible For Award. all Joint Ventures Must Be Sba Certified At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Responses, And Award And Must Submit Agreements That Comply With 13 Cfr 128.402 Prior To Contract Award. all Prime Firms Must Meet The Naics Code Requirement Specified In This Notice. The Contracting Officer Will Verify The Naics Code In Vetcert. Failure To Meet The Naics Code Requirement May Result In The Rejection Of The Sf 330 Submission. sf 330 Submissions Received After The Date And Time Specified Will Not Be Considered. Late Proposal Rules Per Far 15.208 Will Be Followed For Late Submittals. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Not Be Evaluated. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf 330 Submission Package. it Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Contract Opportunities Website At Sam.gov For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submitting Their Sf 330.

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Development, Local Cooperation And Fire Prevention Of The Principality Of Asturias | Pavement Improvement Of The Te 3 Entrago Taja Highway In Teverga

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Development, Local Cooperation And Fire Prevention Of The Principality Of Asturias | Pavement Regeneration of the Salgueiras-el Couso Road (Villanueva De Oscos)

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Development, Local Cooperation And Fire Prevention Of The Principality Of Asturias | Transport Interchange Construction Work in El Huca (Oviedo)

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Development, Local Cooperation And Fire Prevention Of The Principality Of Asturias | Structural Improvement Of The Lln-2 Highway Cue Highway In The Surroundings Of Pk 5+200 In Llanes

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Development, Local Cooperation And Fire Prevention Of The Principality Of Asturias | Clearing and Cleaning Service for Several Roads in Road Conservation Zone 4 of the Principality of Asturias.

Purchaser Name: Ministry Of Development, Local Cooperation And Fire Prevention Of The Principality Of Asturias | Cleaning Service for the Units and Facilities of the Materials Laboratory Dependent on the Studies and Road Safety Service of the General Directorate of Infrastructures

Purchaser Name: Management Of The Consortium For Prevention, Fire Extinction And Rescue Province Of Seville | The Object of this Contract is the provision of protection and prevention services for professional risks, through the hiring of an external prevention service: technical specialties, in their modalities of safety at work, industrial hygiene, ergonomics and applied psychosociology. specialty of Medical Health Surveillance, Both Collective and Individual.