Data Center Tenders

Details: This Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualifications Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder/plan Holder List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse, Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. 1. General Information veterans Health Administration (vha) Program Contracting Activity Central (pcac) Is Seeking Sources And Intends To Award A Firm Fixed Price Design Contract For Architect-engineering (a-e) Services For The Development Of Complete Construction Documents, Which Include Working Drawings, Specifications, And Reports, And Construction Period Services For Project # 580-328 Construct Information Technology Building At The Michael E. Debakey Veteran S Affairs Medical Center Houston, Texas. The A-e Services Contract That Is Anticipated To Be Awarded Will Be Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Statute [formerly Known As The Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36.6 Architectural And Engineering Services, Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 836.6, And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) M836.6 Architect-engineer Services. In Accordance With Far 36.209, Construction Contracts With Architect-engineer Firms, No Contract For The Construction Of A Project Shall Be Awarded To The Firm That Designed The Project Or Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, Except With The Approval Of The Head Of The Agency Or Authorized Representative. 2. Project Information this Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541330 Engineering Services And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $25.5m. A Full Design Team Is Required To Complete This Project. The Va Expects To Award The Anticipated A-e Contract In April 2024. the Anticipated Period Of Performance For Completion Of Design Is 271 Calendar Days After Notice Of Award (noa). The Vaar Magnitude Of Construction Is Between $10,000,000.00 - $20,000,000.00. Please Note That The 271-calendar-day Period Of Performance For The Design Completion Begins With The Issuance Of The Noa And That A Notice To Proceed (ntp) Will Not Be Issued For The Completion Of A Design Project. 3. A-e Selection Process firms Submitting Sf 330s In Response To This Announcement, Not Later Than The Closing Date And Time Specified Herein And In Accordance With Submission Requirements, Will Be Considered For Evaluation. The Selection Will Be Made As Follows: sf 330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Primary Selection Criteria As Stated In This Pre-solicitation Notice. These Evaluations Will Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms For This Particular Requirement. In Accordance With Far 36.602-3(c), At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Then Be Notified Of The Government S Intent To Hold Discussions. All Firms Not Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified At This Time. In Accordance With Far 36.607(b), Any Requested Debriefings Of Successful And Unsuccessful Firms Will Be Held After Final Selection Has Taken Place And Will Be Conducted, To The Extent Practicable, In Accordance With 15.503, 15.506(b) Through (f), And 15.507(c). Note That 15.506(d)(2) Through (d)(5) Do Not Apply To Architect-engineer Contracts. discussions Will Be Held With The Most Highly Qualified Firms In The Form Of Written Responses. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Email And Provided Further Instructions, Including Any Questions Or Topics To Address. Following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Based On The Primary And (if Necessary) Secondary Selection Criteria. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Sf 330 Submission For Each Firm, As Well As Additional Information Obtained Via Discussions. The Highest Rated Firm Will Be Selected To Receive The Solicitation And Engage In Negotiations. the Solicitation Will Be Issued To The Highest Rated Firm As A Request For Fee Proposal (rfp). All Sow Attachments And Site-specific Documentation Will Be Provided To The Highest Rated Firm With The Rfp. A Site Visit Will Be Authorized During The Negotiation Process. An Award Will Then Be Made As Long As The Negotiation Of Rates And Hours Leads To A Fair And Reasonable Determination Of The Final Contract Price. If Negotiations With The Highest Rated Firm Are Unsuccessful, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until Award Can Be Made. 4. Selection Criteria: firms Responding To This Notice Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Using The Primary And Secondary Selection Criteria Listed Below. The Factors Are Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. The Evaluation Will Consider How Each Factor Is Addressed And How It Is Formatted To Coincide With The Selection Criteria. primary Selection Criteria: professional Qualifications (sections C Through E) Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service. The Design Firm And A-e On Staff Representing The Project Or Signing Drawings In Each Discipline Must Be Licensed To Practice In Any One Of The United States Of America. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm As Full-time Employees) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project, And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team When Evaluating Professional Qualifications. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. key Positions And Disciplines Required For This Project Include But Are Not Limited To: Architect (leed Certified), Cad Technician, Registered Communications Distribution Designer (rcdd), Estimator, Civil Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Environmental Engineer, Fire Protection Engineer, Industrial Hygienist, Mechanical Engineer, Plumbing, Project Manager, Quality Assurance, Structural Engineer, And Physical Security Specialists, Commissioning Agent. offer Must Include The Following Statement Of Sdvosb Compliance When Submitting The Personnel Proposed To Perform The Work Under This Requirement: I [signatory Authority] ___________________, [company] __________________, Certify That The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance To Firms That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs In Compliance Of 48 Cfr 852.219-73. the Information Provided In Sections C Through E Of Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate This Evaluation Factor. Do Not Include This Information In Section H, Unless It Is Pertinent To Support The Information Listed In The Other Sections. Specialized Experience And Technical Competence (sections F, G, And H): In The Design And Construction Period Services Shall Be Provided For Network Infrastructure Installation, Renovations, Or Upgrades. Projects Experience Should Include Upgrading Large Scale (multi-building With Multiple Generational Oit Systems) Fiber Optics, Data Cable, Structured Cabling, Electrical Distribution Design, Electrical Upgrades, Uninterruptable Power Systems (ups), Electrical Bonding, Building Management Systems/building Automation Systems (bms/bas), Hvac, It Room Renovations/expansion/relocations, Data Centers/server Rooms Reconfiguration, And Physical Security Upgrades, Duct Bank And Direct Boring Operations. Other Specialized Experience Includes Experience In Critical Path Scheduling, Fire Protection, Construction Infection Control Protocols, Energy Conservation, Transition, And Sustainable Design Practices. submissions Shall Include No More And No Less Than Five (5) Recent And Relevant Government And Private Experience Projects Similar In Size Scope And Complexity, And Experience With The Type Of Projects/competence Above. Relevant Is Defined As Those Task Requirements Identified In The Statement Of Work. Recent Is Defined As Services Provided Within The Past Five (5) Years. Each Project Shall Include The Following: project Title, Location And Detailed Narrative Describing The Scope Of Services Provided Including The Type Of Work Performed By The Offeror And Its Role In The Project I.e. Prime Contract, Teaming Partner Or Subcontractor project Owner, Owner S Point Of Contact Including Telephone Number And Email Address. services & Deliverables Provided Under The Contract/task Order period Of Performance, Including Start And Completion Dates total Dollar Value Of The Project ae Cost Estimate Vs. Actual Construction Cost contract Number Associated With The Project. section G Will Used To Evaluate The Prior Experience Of The Prime Firm And Any Key Subcontractors Working Together On The Provided Relevant Projects. the Offeror Shall Include Narratives Addressing The Following Topics In Section H. Simply Re-stating This List In Section H Will Not Be Sufficient. The Narrative Of How The Firm Addresses Each Of These Will Be Evaluated. the Management Approach the Coordination Of Disciplines And Subcontractors quality Control Procedures, And familiarity With Va Design Guides/manuals, Master Specifications And Other Applicable Standards. capacity (section H): The Evaluation Will Consider The Firm S Ability To Meet The Schedule Of The Overall Project, As Well As The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time. Provide The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines By Providing Current Project Workload, Inclusive Of All Projects Awarded By The Va During The Previous 12 Months And The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts. Offeror Shall Clearly State Their Available Capacity Presenting Workload Percentages For The Key Disciplines And/or Team Members. Also, The Offeror Must Provide The Completion Percentages And Expected Completion Date For The Va Projects Awarded In The Previous 12 Months. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Please Ensure The Capacity Applies Toward The Team/personnel Provided In The Sf 330. past Performance (section H): Past Performance Will Be Evaluated On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Database Will Be Reviewed To Evaluate The Projects That Have A Va Cpars Entry. Va Cpars Are Not Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330 Submission. The Contract Number For The Project Must Be Submitted For Each Project Provided In Section F So Cpars Can Be Reviewed In The Database. Please Note We Are Unable To Review Any Cpars From Other Federal Agencies Outside Of The Va. for Any Project That Does Not Have Va Cpars Data Available, A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Is Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330. If The Firm (prime Or Subcontractor) Was Not The Prime Contractor On Any Project Submitted In The Sf330, A Ppq Must Be Submitted Listing Their Specific Role (key Disciplines) As A Subcontractor. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. In The Event That A Firm Does Not Receive A Requested Complete Ppq From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title/contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. the Government May Consider Additional Performance Related Information Regarding The Firm, To Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. If Appropriate, The Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services May Be Evaluated. failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Will Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. for Ppqs, Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document. Completed Ppqs Should Be Incorporated Into The Sf 330 Directly. Ppqs Should Not Be Submitted To The Vha Pcac Directly. Any Ppqs Will Not Be Counted Towards The Page Limitations For This Submission. However, Any Narratives Provided For Past Performance In Section H Will Be Counted Toward The Page Limit. . knowledge Of Locality (section H): Knowledge Of The Locality, To Include Specific Knowledge Of Certain Local Conditions Or Project Site Features, Such As Geological Features, Climatic Conditions, Working With And Local Construction Methods Or Local Laws And Regulations. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. note That The Intent Of This Factor Is To Showcase A Firm S Understanding Of The Site And Locality, And Not Where The Firm Is Located, How Far Away The Firm/branch Office Is From The Site, And How They Would Travel To The Site. Information Related To The Firm S Location Shall Instead Be Provided In Section H Under Secondary Selection Criterion Factor 1, Geographic Location. See Below. experience In Construction Period Services (section H): Experience In Construction Period Services Must Be Demonstrated Via Project Experience. These May Be The Same Projects Identified Above In Factor 1; However, The Firm Shall Clearly Delineate The Types Of Construction Period Services Performed For Each. Refer To The Statement Of Work For Review Timeline Expectations. Project Descriptions Must Include Experience With: solicitation Support Services, professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period coordination With Commissioning Requirements review Of Construction Submittals support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Cost Estimates attendance At Weekly Conference Calls providing Minutes Of Meetings Between The Ae, Va, And Contractors pre-final Inspection Site Visits generation Of Punch-list Reports, And production Of As-built Documentation. the Firm Shall Provide A Detailed Description Of Projects Worked That Illustrate Experience In These Ten Areas. Projects Must Be Within The Last Ten (10) Years. in Addition, The Firm Must Include A Description Of Experience Addressing Unforeseen Conditions And Emergent Situations, Conducting Situation Evaluations And Make Midcourse Corrections. Include Description On How The Firm Can Be Proactive Or Responsive In These Situations. the Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. secondary Selection Criterion*: geographic Location. Location Of The Firm, As Measured By The Driving Distance (miles) Between The Offeror S Principal Business Location And The Michael E. Debakey Vamc, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030-4211. Determination Of The Mileage Will Be Based On Google Maps (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/). *the Secondary Selection Criterion Is Used As A Tiebreaker, If Necessary, In Ranking The Most Highly Qualified Firms Following The Completion Of Discussions. The Secondary Selection Criterion Will Not Be Applied When Determining A Firm S Sf 330 Submission Highly Qualified Or Not Highly Qualified. 5. Submission Requirements: the Below Information Contains The Instructions And Format That Must Be Followed For The Submission Of The Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications: submit One (1) Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications To Contract Specialist Charles Steelman At Charles.steelman@va.gov. This Must Include Parts I And Ii And Any Applicable Attachments. the Submission Must Include The Sf 330, Architect-engineer Qualifications (form Is Available Online At Http://www.cfm.va.gov/contract/ae.asp). the Sf 330 Submission Is Due By 1:00 Pm Et On Jan. 5, 2024. the Sf 330 Must Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted. the Subject Line Of The Email Must Read: Sf 330 Submission - 36c77624r0002 Construct New It Building, Houston Tx the Sf 330 Submission Must Not Exceed A Total Of 35 Pages. This Includes Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information. Any Pages Submitted By An Offeror That Exceed The Limit Will Not Be Considered During The Evaluation. Each Page Must Be In Arial Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. Part Ii Of The Sf 330 And Any Cpars Or Ppqs Will Not Count Toward The Page Limitation. a Ppq Obtained For Another Sf 330 Submission May Be Submitted For This Project. However, If Significant Portions Of The Project Have Been Completed Since The Ppq Was Filled Out, A New Ppq Should Be Submitted To Accurately Assess The Project. firms Must Include The Following Information In Section B Of The Sf 330 Submission: 1) Sam Unique Entity Identifier 2) Tax Id Number 3) Cage Code 4) Primary Point Of Contact S Email Address And Phone Number all Questions Must Be Submitted To Charles.steelman@va.gov With The Subject Line Sf 330 Questions - 36c77624r0002 Construct New It Building, Houston Tx. The Cutoff For Question Submission Is 1:00 Pm Et On Dec 15, 2023. Questions Will Be Answered Through Modification To The Pre-sol Notice Posted To Contract Opportunities At Sam.gov. this Procurement Is A 100% Set-aside For Sdvosb Concerns. Offers Received From Other Than Sdvosbs Will Not Be Considered. Offerors Must Be Certified As Sdvosbs By The U.s. Small Business Administration (sba) And Visible In The Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/) At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award. Failure To Be Certified In The Vetcert Database At These Times Will Result In The Offeror Being Deemed Ineligible For Award. all Joint Ventures Must Be Sba Certified At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award And Must Submit Agreements That Comply With 13 Cfr 128.402 Prior To Contract Award. all Prime Firms Must Meet The Naics Code Requirement Specified In This Notice. The Contracting Officer Will Verify The Naics Code In Vetcert. Failure To Meet The Naics Code Requirement May Result In The Rejection Of The Sf 330 Submission. sf 330 Submissions Received After The Date And Time Specified Will Not Be Considered. Late Proposal Rules Per Far 15.208 Will Be Followed For Late Submittals. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Not Be Evaluated. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf 330 Submission Package. it Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Contract Opportunities Website At Sam.gov For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submitting Their Sf 330.

Details: Amendment 01: Updated To Add Responses To Industry Questions. Further, Aflcmc Makes A Few Minor Clarifications In The Attached Performance Work Statement. number: Fa8600-23-s-c056-004 naics Code And Associated Description: 518210 federal Agency Name And Contracting Officer: Department Of Air Force (daf) Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (aflcmc), Neal Duiker, Neal.duiker@us.af.mil commercial Solutions Opening Title: This Is A Combined Synopsis/solicitation: Commercial Solutions Opening (cso) – Aflcmc Data Operation Cso, Closed, Two-step, Titled “project Night Owl - Csocall 4” commercial Solutions Opening Number: Fa8600-23-s-c056 commercial Solutions Opening Type: This Is The Initial Announcement Under Call 4. This Will Be A Two-step Call Solicitation. note: Word Copy Of The Final Call Is Attached To This Announcement. There Are Formatting Limitations Within Sam.gov. In The Event There Is A Discrepancy Between This Posting And The Attached Word Document, The Word Document Shall Control. first Step: White Paper Due Date And Time: White Papers Will Be Accepted Until 26 July 2024 At 1700 Et. White Papers May Be Submitted At Any Time During This Period. White Papers Received After Specified Date And Time Will Be Considered Late In Accordance With Far 52.212-1(f). Interested Vendors Can Submit Clarifying Questions To Aflcmc By 1 July 2024. Aflcmc Will Publish All Received Questions And Aflcmc’s Responses (anticipated 10 July 2024) Prior To The White Paper Submission Date. All Submissions (questions And White Papers) Shall Be Made To The Designated Submission Pocs Below. second Step: Proposal Due Date And Time: In Accordance With This Call, Aflcmc Will Down Select Vendors From The First Step To Submit A Step 2 Proposal. Proposal Due Date And Time Will Be Provided In A Separately Issued Requests For Proposal (rfp) Sent To Offers That Submit A Solution Brief And Pricing Proposal That Meet Or Exceed Evaluation Criteria Contained In This Call. submission Poc: White Papers Must Be Submitted Via Email To The Contracting Points Of Contact (pocs): contracting Officer Name: Neal Duiker email: Neal.duiker@us.af.mil contract Specialist Name: Kimberly Conley email: Kimberly.conley.3@us.af.mil full Text – Call 4 (project Night Owl) overview this Commercial Services Opening (cso) Call Is Intended To Be As Streamlined As Possible To Allow For The Exploration Of Modern Solutions To Support A Variety Of Critical National Security Systems. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (aflcmc) Invites Vendors To Submit Innovative And Novel Technical Solutions Which Address All Aspects Of Digital Infrastructure (di), Focusing On The User Story Focus Areas Below. This Requires Delivering An Enduring, Secure, Robust, Efficient, Responsive, Agile, Elastic And Extensible Di Solution Spanning All Classification Levels. many Aflcmc Projects Operate In Varying Classification Environments, Including Highly Classified Environments (collateral, Sensitive Compartmentalized Information (sci), And Special Access Program (sap)). Though Some Di Focus Areas May Require Unclassified Work, Respondents Should Be Aware That To Be Eligible For Any Contract/instrument Award, Vendors Must Be Cleared To Work In Sci/sap Environments At White Paper Submission. If Vendor Intends To Perform Classified Work At Their Facility (or Subcontractor Or Sub-awardee’s Facility), They Will Need To Provide A Facility Accreditation Letter (fal) For Each Facility To The Contracting Officer/agreements Officer By No Later Than (nlt) Contract Award (anticipated September/october 2024). this Cso Call May Result In The Award Of A Far-based Contract Or An Other Transaction For Prototype Project Pursuant To 10 Usc 4022. Aflcmc Intends To Follow The Processes Identified In The Data Operations Cso Unless Otherwise Noted Or Annotated In This Call. Aflcmc Is Not Obligated To Make Any Awards As A Result Of This Call And All Awards Are Explicitly Subject To The Availability Of Funds And Successful Negotiations. The Government Is Not Responsible For Any Monies Expended By Any Vendor Prior To The Issuance Of Any Awarded Contract/agreement. aflcmc Reserves The Right To Modify The Solicitation Requirements Of This Cso Call At Its’ Sole Discretion. _____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Digital Infrastructure (di) Technology Focus Areas a. General Information: Aflcmc Is Seeking A Managed Service Provider To Provide Operations And Sustainment Support For A Major Sap Weapon System. Currently, Aflcmc Is On Contract With A Cloud Service Provider (csp) Who Provides Edge Cloud Devices (azure Stack Hubs (ash) And Hyperscale Capabilities. The Csp Also Provides Networking Across Campus Area Networks And Wide Area Networks, Including Purchase And Installation Of Aggregation Switches, Access Switches, Azure Access Points (aaps) And Network As A Service (naas). Further, The Csp Provides Disaster Recovery And Help Desks For Cloud Services, Edge, And Ash Equipment. Further, The Csp Is Contracted To Provide Network Operations Center (noc) And Cyber Threat Operations Center (ctoc) Services For The Network And Cloud Only. within The Cloud Environments, Aflcmc Operates An Azure Cloud-based Software Devsecops Environment Supporting Multiple Usaf Programs (hereafter Referred To As Crucible). The Crucible Environment Contains Cloud Resources At The Il5 (controlled Unclassified Information), Il6 (secret) And Il6+(secret Special Access Program) Classifications. Enrolled Usaf Programs Work Within Separate, Segregated Enclaves With Multiple Security Enclaves (ex. Program A Has Its Own Il5, Il6 And Il6+ Environment Separate From Program B’s Enclaves). Further, Programs Access The Crucible Environment From Varying Usaf Networks. Aflcmc Designed The Crucible Environment To Permit Future Usaf Programs Not Currently Enrolled To Access And Establish Enclaves To Meet Specific Mission Needs. When New Programs Enroll, The Crucible Environment May Need To Peer To A New Network. Therefore, Crucible Requires Sufficient Security Controls And Artifacts To Obtain An Authority To Operate (ato). The Csp Is Providing Initial Environment Automation And Establishment. the Csp Will Continue To Provide These Services. Therefore, Interested Vendors Shall Not Include Any Of These Services In Their Proposal. Aflcmc Is Providing Csp Responsibilities As Contextual Information Necessary To Ensure Below Requested Services Are Not Duplicated To Csp Activities. b. User Story 1 – Managed Services Provider:aflcmc Is Seeking A Managed Service Provider (msp) Who Can Deliver Services Such As Network, Application, Infrastructure, And Security Via Ongoing And Regular Support And Active Administration On Customers’ Premises, Or In A Third-party Data Center. Project Night Owl Supports A Highly Classified Aflcmc Weapon System, Which Requires Onsite Support To Classified Sap Environments. Further, This Particular Program Exclusively Utilizes Microsoft Azure Cloud And Edge Services. Therefore, Aflcmc Requires Msp Vendors To Be A Microsoft Solutions Partner For Infrastructure And "digital And App Innovation" With Extensive Knowledge Of Azure Cloud Services, Specifically Secret And Top Secret Cloud. Msp Vendors Must Demonstrate Mastery In Azure Applications And Services Offered Within Both The Commercial And Government Azure Services. As Further Articulated In This Call, Only Microsoft Solutions Partner For Infrastructure And "digital And App Innovation" Will Be Determined Awardable. aflcmc Also Has Critical Timelines For Preparing Varying Locations To Be Mission Capable. Therefore, Msp Will Need To Demonstrate Ability To Meet Or Exceed Critical Timeframes For Hardware Deployments, Workstation (thin Client And Peripherals) Procurement And Installation, And Onsite Help Desk Support. Msp Provider Will Also Work With System Users To Customize Applications And Provide General User Support To Meet Missional Needs. Further, Msp Will Work Closely With Csp And Usg Users To Configure The Ash, Network Configuration And Hyperscale To Meet Specific Weapon System Requirements. Therefore, Msp Must Demonstrate And Be Willing To Openly Communicate With Csp And All Usg Stakeholders (including A&as Providers) To Meet Missional Requirements. services Desired: Aflcmc Is Seeking A Five (5) Year Msp Contract. Aflcmc Desires The Following General Services With Prescribed Ground Rules And Assumptions That Should Be Utilized In Formulating Your Step One Solution Paper. If A Vendor Is Down Selected To Submit A Step 2 Proposal, Aflcmc Will Disclose Detailed Sites, Timelines, And Architectures For Specific Cost Breakdown. aflcmc Prefers Solutions To Be Automated To The Maximum Extent Practicable. Aflcmc Is Not Providing Specific Service Level Agreements (sla) / Service Level Objectives (slo). Therefore, All Vendors Shall Propose Slas/slos For Msp Services. Lastly, Aflcmc Does Not Desire Solutions Highly Leveraged On Annual License Agreement Costs. Therefore, Vendors May Be Excluded By Proposing Solutions Consisting Of High Annual Licensing Fees. Attached To This Call Is A Draft Performance Work Statement (pws) Describing The General Services Under This Call. When Proposing A White Paper, Vendors Shall Assume The Following: sla/slos: Aflcmc Specifically Asks Interested Vendors To Propose Slas/slos Pertaining To Each Proposed Service. Aflcmc Provides Varying Sla/slo Categories That Shall Be Used In Proposal Of Your Services. Vendors Are Expected To Provide The Sla/slo Values In Accordance With The Provided Definitions. msp Shall Propose Step One White Papers Assuming Three Operation Locations, A West Coast/california Location, A Mid-west Location (identify The Geographic Location Selected), And A Washington/capitol Region Location. msp Shall Propose Step One White Papers Assuming Two Hundred (200) Users Per Location And Scaling To Three Hundred Fifty (350) Users Per Location On Year 3. for Hardware Deployment, Msp Should Assume All Workstations Require Thin Clients And All Necessary Peripherals To Perform Mission Tasks. Msp Will Procure And Install All Required Hardware. No Hardware Will Be Provided As Government Furnished Equipment (gfe). aflcmc Desires Automated Processes To The Maximum Extent Practicable. Therefore, Aflcmc Will Evaluate Useability, Scalability, And Overall Capability To Meet Weapon System Mission Needs. devops Implementation (paragraph 2.8 Of The Managed Service Provider Performance Work Statement): Aflcmc Is Looking For The “best Athlete” To Serve As Devops Coach. The Intent Of This Section Is To Educate Usg Software Developers On Executing Weapon System Development Needs. Therefore, Vendors Should Identify Specific Personnel And Identify The Credentials For The Devops Coach. focus Areas Sought: Fielding Operations, Network Operations Center/security Operations Center, Help Desk. anticipated Delivery Date: 1 Year Base With Subsequent Four (4) Year Options _____________________________________________________________________________ 3. Call Description, Instructions To Vendors, And Evaluation Criteria overview: This Call Will Be A Two-step Call. White Papers May Be Submitted At Any Time Prior To The Due Date And Time Specified In This Call. Vendors Are Responsible For Monitoring Sam.gov For Any Amendments To This Call That May Have Updated Information. White Papers Will Be Evaluated Against The Criteria Detailed Below. After The Submitted White Papers Have Been Evaluated By Aflcmc, Vendors Will Be Notified If They Have Been Selected To Submit A Full Proposal For Step 2. step 1: White Paper Due Date And Time Is 26 July 2024 At 1700 Et. Aflcmc Will Review Step 1 White Papers And Down Select Vendors Based On The Below Evaluation Criteria. Interested Vendors Can Submit Clarifying Questions To Aflcmc By 1 July 2024. Aflcmc Will Publish All Received Questions And Aflcmc’s Responses (anticipated 10 July 2024) Prior To The White Paper Submission Date. step 2: Proposal Due Date And Time Will Be Provided In Requests For Proposal (rfps) Sent To Offers That Submit A Solution Brief And Pricing Proposal That Meet Or Exceed Evaluation Criteria Contained In This Call.aflcmc Reserves The Right To Conduct Individual Meetings With All Vendors Invited To Submit A Step 2 Proposal. If Invited To Submit A Step 2 Proposal, Aflcmc Will Require Vendors To Sign Non-disclosure Agreements And Follow Reasonable And Necessary Instructions To Ensure Specific Program Requirements Are Secured Prior To Rfp Release. Refusal To Sign A Non-disclosure Agreement And/or Follow Any Reasonable And Necessary Security Instruction Will Disqualify Selected Vendors From Receiving Specific Program Requirements And Will Not Be Able To Participate In The Step 2 Phase Of The Competition. overarching Instructions: Aflcmc Desires A Singular Vendor Who Can Provide All Services Articulated Herein Or Act As Prime Integrator For A Team Of Vendors Covering All Stated Services. Aflcmc Encourages Small Business Participation To The Maximum Extent Practicable. Therefore, Aflcmc Has An Aspirational Small Business Goal Of 15-25% Small Business Work Allocation. If Utilized, Aflcmc Desires To Know Teaming Arrangements And Understand Clear Delineation On Which Companies Will Be Responsible/supporting Each Requirement. Further, To The Extent The Teaming Agreements Can Be Disclosed, Aflcmc Requests Disclosure Of All Teaming Agreements Entered Into With Other Vendors. as A Reminder, Responses Must Be Unclassified. Aflcmc Will Not Accept Classified Proposals Under This Call. step 1 Instructions: Below Is The Required Structure And Required Content For Proposal Submission For This Call. Vendor Responses Shall Be Submitted To Mr. Neal Duiker, At Neal.duiker@us.af.mil & Ms. Kimberly Conley, At Kimberly.conley.3@us.af.mil, Nlt 1700 (et) On 26 July 2024 At 1700 Et Via Email In Either Pdf, Word, Or Powerpoint File Types. Note: No Other File Types Will Be Accepted. Do Not Provide Proposal Documents In A .zip File. Please Ensure You Receive A Confirmation Email Of Receipt. If You Do Not Get A Confirmation Email, Then Your Proposal May Not Have Been Received By Aflcmc. Proposals Shall Include The Following: part 1 - Cover Page: Vendor’s Cover Page Must Include The Following Information: vendor Name vendor Address vendor Technical, Programmatic, And Contracts Points Of Contact (poc) list Whether Your Organization Qualifies As Any Of The Following In Accordance With Far Part 19: Small Business (sb), Small Disadvantaged Business (sdb), Woman-owned Small Business (wosb), Hubzone Small Business, Veteran-owned Business, Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb), Historically Black College Or University (hbcu) And Minority Institution dd254 Info cage Code cognizant Security Office name address phone Number part 2 - Questionnaire Responses: Vendors Shall Address All The Following Questions: please Indicate Whether You Are A Microsoft Solutions Partner For Infrastructure And "digital And App Innovation" (y/n). provide A List Of General Classification Levels And Additionally Proscribed Categories From The Below Options That Your Organization Has Utilized For Past Projects. (unclassified / Cui / Secret / Secret Sar / Top Secret/ Top Secret Sar / Top Secret Sci) Note: Do Not Provide Any Classified Information Regarding Past Projects On Your White Paper Submission, To Include Contract/agreement Numbers (piids). aflcmc Problems Require Vendors To Have Familiarity With Azure Cli And Automation Solutions To Include Azure Resource Manager (arm) Templates Or Bicep Templates. Does The Services Your Organization Put Forward Utilize Azure Cli And Associated Automation Solutions? (y/n) does Your Company Have Experience With Any Of The Tools From The Addendum A Including Jira, Terraform, Helmfile, Backstage, Oscal, Gitlab, Or Jenkins? (three Sentence Max) has Your Software Been Evaluated Or Accredited For Use On Government Afnet? (y/n) part 3 - User Story Response(s) In Addition To The Question Responses Above, Vendors Are Limited To Providing A White Paper Solutions Brief Not To Exceed Five (5) Pages (times New Roman, 12 Pt Font) Plus A Title Page Each. The User Story Response(s) Must Include The Following: a Suggested Technical Solution, Including Sla/slos For Each Category (calculated Using The Provided Definition), Automated Solutions, And Description Of The Qualifications Of Devops Coach. a Rough Transition To Work Plan any Ground Rules/assumptions On Which Your Solution Is Based a Rough Order Of Magnitude (rom) Price Estimate For Your Solution Provided By Requirement one Or Multiple Examples Of Experience Providing Like Or Similar Services (demonstrated Experience With Highly Secured It Systems, Classified Networks, And/or Special Access Programs Is Preferred). proposals Received In Response To The Cso Shall Be Evaluated In Accordance With Evaluation Factors Specified Below Using A Scientific, Technological, Or Other Subject-matter Expert Peer Review Process. step 1 White Paper Evaluation Criteria: Aflcmc Will Review The Vendor’s White Paper As Follows: security: Does The Vendor Have The Requisite Security Clearances (facility And Personnel) To Perform The Services? Aflcmc Work Requires Performance Within Il 5, Il6 And Il6+ Environments. Failure To Meet Security Requirements Upon Step 1 White Paper Will Constitute Sufficient Justification To Exclude The Proposal From Further Consideration. Vendors Are Required To Provide Dcsa Issued Fcl And Nist Compliance Documentation. Further, Vendors Shall Identify Secure Networks Immediately Available For Secure Communications In Step 2. evaluators Will Assess Whether Vendors Maintain Adequate Security Approval To Work Within These Environments At The Time Of White Paper Submission. Vendors Unable To Operate Per These Security Instructions Will Be Deemed Not Awardable. azure Expertise: Is The Vendor A Microsoft Solutions Partner For Infrastructure And "digital And App Innovation" And Have Sufficient Expertise Using Azure Cloud, Azure Stack Hubs, Azure Services With Both Commercial And Government Enrollments, Azure Access Points, And/or Azure Virtual Desktops? Failure To Meet This Requirement Upon Step 1 White Paper Will Constitute Sufficient Justification To Exclude The Proposal From Further Consideration. evaluators Will Assess Whether The Vendor Demonstrates Superior Mastery Of Azure Offerings To Be Able To Meet Weapon System Needs. Vendors Unable To Demonstrate Superior Mastery Will Be Deemed Not Awardable. experience: Has The Vendor Demonstrated Experience In Providing Like Or Similar Services? Does Vendor Have Demonstrated Experience As Or With Addendum A Software/tools? evaluators Will Assess Whether The Vendor Demonstrates Capability In Providing Like Or Similar Services To Other Usg Agencies, Especially In Highly Sensitive/controlled Environments. price: Is The Rom Price Reasonable For The Proposed Scope Of Work And In Relation To The Independent Government Estimate? interested Vendors Are Required To Provide A Rough Order Of Magnitude (rom) For Their Solution Brief. The Competition Review Team Will Evaluate And Assess Whether Rom Prices Are Reasonable Based On: the Solution Offered In Comparison To The Proposed Slas/slos, And the Rom In Relation To The Ige technical: Will Offered Services Meet The Msp Needs Of Aflcmc? vendors Are Required To Propose Sla/slos Associated With The Services Requirements Contained Herein. vendors Shall Specifically Identify Automated Processes And/or Solutions To The Maximum Extent Possible. This Includes Providing Explanation For The Underlying Business Intelligence/data Analytics Solution Requested. vendors Shall Provide The Experience And Credentials For Devops Coach(es). vendors Shall Indicate Whether Their Solutions/services Require An Annual License Agreement (and Associated Costs). Aflcmc Strongly Prefers Solutions Without Annual Licensing Costs. vendors Shall Indicate How It Will Utilize Small Business Concerns In Performance Of This Work. evaluators Will Assess Whether The Solutions Meet Overall Aflcmc Objectives. Evaluators Will Place Strong Emphasis On Proposed: 1. Sla/slos In Relation To The Price, 2. Automated Solutions In Terms Of Useability, Scalability, And Cost, 3. Best Athlete For Devops Coaches, And 4. Small Business Utilization. upon Completion Of The White Paper Evaluations, Aflcmc Will Determine Whether The Offered Solutions Are Of Interest For Further Consideration. The Security And Azure Experience Factors Will Be Evaluated First. Any Vendor Failing To Meet One Or Both Of These Requirements Will Not Be Evaluated Further. The Government Will Review The Remaining Factors (experience, Price And Technical) To Determine If It Has The Potential To Meet Aflcmc’s Needs Based On The Above Criteria, Which Are Listed In Equal Order Of Importance. step 2 Instructions: The Government Will Invite Select Vendors To Submit Full Proposals Based On Favorable Evaluation Results Of White Papers Approximately 30 Days Of The White Paper Submission Date. Solution Briefs And Pricing Proposals Will Be Requested Via A Request For Proposal (rfp) Letter By The Contracting Officer And Will Contain Separate Submission Instructions And Applicable Due Dates And Timelines. The Government Will Address Any Organizational Conflict Of Interest (oci) Concerns On A Case-by-case Basis With Any Vendor Invited To Submit A Step 2 Proposal. For Any Oci Issues, Instructions Will Be Included Within The Step 2 Rfp. aflcmc Reserves The Right To Conduct Individual Meetings With All Vendors Invited To Submit A Step 2 Proposal. If Invited To Submit A Step 2 Proposal, Aflcmc Will Require Vendors To Sign Non-disclosure Agreements And Follow Reasonable And Necessary Instructions To Ensure Specific Program Requirements Are Secured Prior To Rfp Release. Refusal To Sign A Non-disclosure Agreement And/or Follow Any Reasonable And Necessary Security Instruction Will Disqualify Selected Vendors From Receiving Specific Program Requirements And Will Not Be Able To Participate In The Step 2 Phase Of The Competition. Vendors Invited Into Step 2 Will Receive Additional Information From Aflcmc Detailing The Total Number Of Users, Specific Locations, Exact Network Architecture And Other Pertinent Information Necessary To Accurately Price A Proposal. This Additional Information Is Sensitive And Cannot Be Provided During Step 1. Aflcmc Expects Step 2 Vendors To Tailor Their Proposals To Meet These Specific Requirements. unsuccessful Vendors Will Be Notified By The Government, Either Via Email Or Letter, To Inform Them That The Proposed Effort Is Not Of Interest To The Government At This Time. Upon Request From An Unsuccessful Vendor, The Government Will Provide A Brief Explanation Of The Reason For Not Requesting A Step 2 Proposal, But Will Not Entertain Any Questions From Unsuccessful Vendors. step 2 Proposal Review, Evaluation And Selection Process: each User Story Proposal Will Be Evaluated By The Government And Stand On Its Own Technical Merit. Proposals Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Following Evaluation Criteria: technical: do The Services And Offered Solutions Meet The Needs Of Aflcmc As Outlined In The Draft Pws? Aflcmc Will Prefer Solutions Offering The Greatest Benefit Regarding Scaling, Customization Ability, And Management Capabilities. usg Will Evaluate Final Solutions On The Following Criteria: 1. Do The Proposed Services Meet The Needs Of The Aflcmc’s Missional And Opstempo Needs? Vendor Solutions Shall Provide High-quality, Affordable Services To Meet All Requirements Within The Draft Pws Attached To This Call. Based On The Additional Requirements Disclosed At Step 2, Will Vendor Be Able To Meet Critical Timelines And Maintain Operational Staffing To Ensure Missional Success. 2. Does The Proposed Solution Provide Automated Services Allowing For Self-service To The Maximum Extent Practicable? Do They Describe How Service Consumers Will Request, Access, And Manage Services? 3. Does The Proposal Talk About How The Vendor Validates And Manages Change Within The Provided Services And Environments? How Does The Proposed Solution To Deploy And Maintain Infrastructure Meet Requirements? Are There Mature Processes And Technology In Place To Accomplish The Need In A Timely Repeatable And Sustainable Fashion? 4. How Much Recurring Costs And Annual License Fees Are Contained In The Solution? Aflcmc Will Prefer Solutions That Do Not Depend On Significant Annual Recurring Costs Or Annual Licensing Fees. 5. Are The Offered Sla/slos Scoped Sufficiently To Ensure Weapon System Can Meet Mission Needs/continuity Of Operations? Aflcmc Will Evaluate The Proposed/contracted Sla/slos And The Risk Of Impact To Weapon System Should Sla/slos Are Not Met. 6. Does The Vendor Have A Good Staffing Strategy That Ensures It Can Meet Program Critical Deadlines? Aflcmc Will Evaluate Staffing Plans To Meet Critical Program Timelines. Further, Aflcmc Will Evaluate Attrition Risks For Critical Staffing Needs. 7. Does Vendor Have The Necessary Training And Experience Customizing Azure Applications, Environments, Tools, Etc. To Meet Unique, Specific User Needs? Aflcmc Will Evaluate Vendors Capability To Customize Base Configurations To Meet Weapon System Specifications Within Reasonable Timeframes. Does The Vendor Have Relevant Past Experience In Providing Like Or Similar Services In Highly Secure Environments? The Government In Its Sole Discretion Reserves The Right To Also Consider The Vendor's Past Performance On Other Efforts. 8. Aflcmc Will Evaluate A Vendor’s Experience Performing Services Within Highly Secure Environments. Crucible Operates Within Il5, Il6 And Il6+ Enclaves. Awardable Vendors Must Demonstrate Relevant Experience Working In Highly Secure Environments. 2. Price: The Proposed Price Will Be Evaluated For Reasonableness. aflcmc Will Review The Final Price Proposal In Relation To Both The Scope Of Work Proposed By The Final Solution And The Independent Government Estimate. Aflcmc Will Use Dfars 212.209 As Guidance In Evaluating Price. no Other Criteria Will Be Used. based On The Government’s Evaluation, Proposals Will Be Categorized As Awardable Or Not Awardable (see Definitions Below). The Selection Of One Or More Sources For Award Will Be Based On The Government’s Evaluation, As Well As Importance To Agency Programs And Funding Availability. awardable: Proposal Is Recommended For Acceptance If Sufficient Funding Is Available. not Awardable: Even If Sufficient Funding Existed, The Proposal Should Not Be Funded. note: The Government Reserves The Right To Award All, Some, One, Or None Of The Proposals. When The Government Elects To Award Only A Part Of A Proposal, The Selected Part May Be Categorized As Awardable, Though The Proposal As A Whole May Not Merit Such A Categorization. if A Vendor Is Determined To Be Awardable And Chooses To Proceed To Contract/agreement Award, Aflcmc And The Vendor Will Enter Into Contract/agreement Negotiations. Prior To Award Of A Contract/agreement, The Contracting Officer/agreements Officer Will Make A Price Reasonableness Determination. debriefings: for Unsuccessful Vendors In Step 2, The Government Will Conduct Written, Post-award Debriefings Upon Request In Accordance With Far 52.212-1(l) And This Call. Debriefings Will Address The Evaluation Factors Contained Herein Only. Debriefings Will Not Include A Comparison Of Submissions. additional Information: this Cso Call May Result In The Award Of A Far Part 12 Contract Or An Other Transaction Agreement (ota) Under 10 Usc 4022 (also Referred To As An Other Transaction For Prototype Or Otp). The Awarded Contract Type Shall Be Either Firm Fixed Price (ffp) Or Fixed Price Incentive (fpi) In Accordance With Far Part 12. the Government Will Be The Sole Decision Authority On Whether To Pursue A Far Part 12 Contract, An Ota, Or No Award At All. The Government Reserves The Right To Award Some, All, Or None Of The Proposals Received In Response To This Call Based On Mission Requirements And The Availability Of Government Funds. The Contracting/agreements Officer Reserves The Right To Negotiate Directly With The Vendor On The Terms And Conditions Prior To Execution Of The Resulting Contract/agreement On Behalf Of The Government. Be Advised That Only A Contracting/agreements Officer Has The Authority To Enter Into, Or Modify, A Binding Contract/agreement On Behalf Of The United States Government. this Call Could Result In The Potential Award Of A Follow-on Production Or Solution Integration Contract Or Ota. vendors Must Possess All Required Personnel Security Clearances, Facility Clearances, And Other Infrastructure Requirements Necessary To Perform Any Proposed Classified Work In Accordance With A Contract Security Classification Specification (dd Form 254) Without Reliance On Government Resources. If Vendor Intends To Perform Classified Work At Their Facility (or Subcontractor Or Sub-awardee’s Facility), They Will Need To Provide A Facility Accreditation Letter (fal) For Each Facility To The Contracting Officer/agreements Officer Upon White Paper Submission. dfars 252.239-7017 - Notice Of Supply Chain Risk (dec 2022): (a) Definitions. “supply Chain Risk,” As Used In This Provision, Means The Risk That An Adversary May Sabotage, Maliciously Introduce Unwanted Function, Or Otherwise Subvert The Design, Integrity, Manufacturing, Production, Distribution, Installation, Operation, Or Maintenance Of A Covered System So As To Surveil, Deny, Disrupt, Or Otherwise Degrade The Function, Use, Or Operation Of Such System (10 U.s.c. 3252). (b) In Order To Manage Supply Chain Risk, The Government May Use The Authorities Provided By Section 10 U.s.c. 3252. In Exercising These Authorities, The Government May Consider Information, Public And Non-public, Including All-source Intelligence, Relating To An Vendor And Its Supply Chain. (c) If The Government Exercises The Authority Provided In 10 U.s.c. 3252 To Limit Disclosure Of Information, No Action Undertaken By The Government Under Such Authority Shall Be Subject To Review In A Bid Protest Before The Government Accountability Office Or In Any Federal Court. 6. Proprietary Information: Information Constituting A Trade Secret, Commercial Or Financial Information, Confidential Personal Information, Or Data Affecting National Security Must Be Clearly Marked. It Shall Be Treated In Confidence To The Extent Permitted By Law. This Restriction Does Not Limit The Government’s Right To Use Information Contained If It Is Obtained From Another Source Without Restriction. Aflcmc Assumes No Liability For Disclosure Or Use Of Unmarked Data And May Use Or Disclose Such Data For Any Purpose. If An Vendor Is Awarded A Contract As A Result Of Or In Connection With The Submission Of Proprietary Data In The Proposal, The Government Shall Have The Right To Duplicate, Use Or Disclose The Data To The Extent Provided In The Resulting Contract/agreement. proposals Containing Data That Is Not To Be Disclosed To The Public For Any Purpose Or Used By The Government Except For Evaluation Purposes Shall Include The Following Legend On The Cover Page: “this Proposal Includes Data That Shall Not Be Disclosed Outside The Government And Supporting Personnel And Shall Not Be Duplicated, Used Or Disclosed—in Whole Or In Part – For Any Purpose Other Than To Evaluate This Proposal. If, However, A Contract Is Awarded To This Vendor As A Result Of – Or In Connection With – The Submission Of This Data, The Government Shall Have The Right To Duplicate, Use, Or Disclose The Data To The Extent Provided In The Resulting Contract. This Restriction Does Not Limit The Government’s Right To Use Information Contained In This Data If It Is Obtained From Another Source Without Restriction. The Data Subject To This Restriction Are Contain In Sheets [insert Numbers Or Other Identification Of Sheets].” each Restricted Data Sheet Should Be Marked As Follows: use Or Disclose Of Data Contained On This Sheet Is Subject To The Restriction On The Title Page Of This Proposal. 7. Data Rights: For Vendors Invited To Provide A Phase 2 Proposal, All Proposal Submissions Shall Include Data Rights Assertions, If Applicable. This Will Be An Essential Element Of Each Proposal Submission. Special Licensing Agreements May Be Negotiated Upon Request. Aflcmc Reserves The Right To Negotiate Data Rights As Part Of The Contracting/agreement Process. Aflcmc Will Provide Requested Guidance On How To Meet Data Rights Requirements. 8. Export-controlled Items: Depending On The Proposal Subject Matter, An Awarded Contract May Be Subject To Export Control (international Traffic In Arms (itar) 22 Cfr 120-131, Or Export Administration Regulations (ear) 15 Cfr 710-774). If The Effort Is Subject To Export Controls, Then A Certified Dd Form 2345, Military Critical Technical Data Agreement, Will Be Required To Be Submitted With Proposals. Dfars 252.225-7048, “export Controlled Item (jun 2013)” Clause Shall Be Contained In All Resulting Contracts. 9.supplier Performance Risk System (sprs): In Order To Receive A Dod Contract, Every Vendor Will Be Required To Perform A Basis Nist Sp 800-171 Dod Assessment. That Process Is Described Here.once The Basic Nist 800-171 Dod Assessment Is Complete, Each Vendor Will Need To Follow The Instructions Contained Within This Page To Enter The Results In Sprp On The Piee Website. 10. Telecommunications: All Otas Or Contracts Awarded Under This Call Will Contain Prohibitions On The Use Of Certain Telecommunications Devices In Accordance With Dfars 52.204-25. 11. Eligible Vendor: This Is An Unrestricted Solicitation And Open To All Vendors. Small Businesses Are Encouraged To Propose. Vendors Are Encouraged To Complete The Annual Representations And Certification In The System For Award Management (sam) As Soon As Possible. 12. You May Be Ineligible For Award If All Requirements Of This Solicitation Are Not Met On The White Paper And Proposal (when Applicable). addendum A: the Following Are Tools That Exist Within The Currently Deployed Environment: user Environment Management: jira Service Management For Account Requests terraform For Iac helmfile For Cac security: oscal gitlab For Running Automation Tasks For Oscal Artifacts azure Defender azure Sentinel azure Monitor tooling For Automation Involves: jenkins gitlab backstage jira terraform mattermost

Details: This Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualifications Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder/plan Holder List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse, Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. 1. General Information veterans Health Administration (vha) Program Contracting Activity Central (pcac) Is Seeking Sources And Intends To Award A Firm Fixed Price Design Contract For Architect-engineering (a-e) Services For The Development Of Complete Construction Documents, Which Include Working Drawings, Specifications, And Reports, And Construction Period Services For Project #640a0-25-700 Ehrm Infrastructure Upgrades At The Va Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, Ca. The A-e Services Contract That Is Anticipated To Be Awarded Will Be Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Statute [formerly Known As The Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36.6 Architectural And Engineering Services, Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 836.6, And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) M836.6 Architect-engineer Services. In Accordance With Far 36.209, Construction Contracts With Architect-engineer Firms, No Contract For The Construction Of A Project Shall Be Awarded To The Firm That Designed The Project Or Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, Except With The Approval Of The Head Of The Agency Or Authorized Representative. 2. Project Information this Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541330 Engineering Services And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $25.5m. A Full Design Team Is Required To Complete This Project. The Va Expects To Award The Anticipated A-e Contract In February 2025. the Anticipated Period Of Performance For Completion Of Design Is 322 Calendar Days After Notice Of Award (noa). The Vaar Magnitude Of Construction Is Between $20,000,000 And $50,000,000. Please Note That The 322-calendar-day Period Of Performance For The Design Completion Begins With The Issuance Of The Noa And That A Notice To Proceed (ntp) Will Not Be Issued For The Completion Of A Design Project. 3. A-e Selection Process firms Submitting Sf 330s In Response To This Announcement, Not Later Than The Closing Date And Time Specified Herein And In Accordance With Submission Requirements, Will Be Considered For Evaluation. The Selection Will Be Made As Follows: sf 330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Primary Selection Criteria As Stated In This Pre-solicitation Notice. These Evaluations Will Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms For This Particular Requirement. In Accordance With Far 36.602-3(c), At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Then Be Notified Of The Government S Intent To Hold Discussions. All Firms Not Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified At This Time. In Accordance With Far 36.607(b), Any Requested Debriefings Of Successful And Unsuccessful Firms Will Be Held After Final Selection Has Taken Place And Will Be Conducted, To The Extent Practicable, In Accordance With 15.503, 15.506(b) Through (f), And 15.507(c). Note That 15.506(d)(2) Through (d)(5) Do Not Apply To Architect-engineer Contracts. discussions Will Be Held With The Most Highly Qualified Firms In The Form Of Written Responses. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Email And Provided Further Instructions, Including Any Questions Or Topics To Address. Following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Based On The Primary And (if Necessary) Secondary Selection Criteria. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Sf 330 Submission For Each Firm, As Well As Additional Information Obtained Via Discussions. The Highest Rated Firm Will Be Selected To Receive The Solicitation And Engage In Negotiations. the Solicitation Will Be Issued To The Highest Rated Firm As A Request For Fee Proposal (rfp). All Sow Attachments And Site-specific Documentation Will Be Provided To The Highest Rated Firm With The Rfp. A Site Visit Will Be Authorized During The Negotiation Process. An Award Will Then Be Made As Long As The Negotiation Of Rates And Hours Leads To A Fair And Reasonable Determination Of The Final Contract Price. If Negotiations With The Highest Rated Firm Are Unsuccessful, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until Award Can Be Made. 4. Selection Criteria: firms Responding To This Notice Will Be Evaluated And Ranked Using The Primary And Secondary Selection Criteria Listed Below. The Factors Are Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. The Evaluation Will Consider How Each Factor Is Addressed And How It Is Formatted To Coincide With The Selection Criteria. primary Selection Criteria (listed In Descending Order Of Importance): specialized Experience And Technical Competence (sections F, G, And H): there Are Two Parts To This Factor Submitting Projects In Section F That Demonstrate Required Experience, And Providing Section H Narratives As Stated Below. Both Parts Must Be In The Sf 330 Submission In Order To Receive At Least An Acceptable Rating. part I: the Projects Should Demonstrate Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In Design And Construction Period Services Provided For Network Infrastructure Installation, Renovations, Or Upgrades. Projects Experience Should Include Upgrading Large Scale (multi-building With Multiple Generational Oit Systems) Fiber Optics, Data Cable, Structured Cabling, Electrical Distribution Design, Electrical Upgrades, Uninterruptable Power Systems (ups), Electrical Bonding, Building Management Systems/building Automation Systems (bms/bas), Hvac, It Room Renovations/expansion/relocations, Data Centers/server Rooms Reconfiguration, And Physical Security Upgrades, Duct Bank And Direct Boring Operations. Other Specialized Experience To Provide Should Include Experience In Critical Path Scheduling, Fire Protection, Construction Infection Control Protocols. Computer-aided Design And Drafting/building Information Modeling, Equipment Resources, And Laboratory Requirements Will Be Evaluated. Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials Will Be Evaluated Where Appropriate. submissions In Section F Shall Include No More And No Less Than Five (5) Recent And Relevant Government And Private Experience Projects Similar In Size Scope And Complexity, And Experience With The Type Of Projects/competence Above. Relevant Is Defined As Those Task Requirements Identified In The Attached Statement Of Work And This Notice. Recent Is Defined As Ae Services Provided On Projects That Have Ended (construction Is Complete, Or Construction Was N/a) Within The Past Ten (10) Years. Each Project Shall Include The Following: project Title And Location (city And State) awarded Contract Number Associated With The Project years Completed professional Services Start And End Dates construction Start And End Dates project Owner, Owner S Point Of Contact Including Telephone Number And Email Address. detailed Narrative Describing: the Scope Of Services Provided Including The Type Of Work Performed By The Offeror its Role In The Project I.e. Prime Contract, Teaming Partner Or Subcontractor. The Firm Completing The Project As Prime Must Match The Past Performance Firm Name. If A Partner To A Jv Completed The Project, Do Not Put The Jv Firm Name Down As Completing The Work. dates For Completion Of A, B, And C Services. state If Cps Was Done On The Project. services & Deliverables Provided Under The Contract/task Order awarded Ae Fee Contract Value, Including Options ae Cost Estimate Vs. Actual Construction Cost the Narrative Shall Describe Actions Taken That Demonstrate The Required Experience. Merely Making A List Of Relevant Areas From The Va Requirements List On The Side Of The Section F Project Is Not Demonstrating In Narrative Form Actions Taken On A Project. note: Awards To Overseas Offices For Projects Outside The United States, Its Territories And Possessions, And Awards To A Subsidiary If The Subsidiary Is Not Normally Subject To Management Decisions, Bookkeeping, And Policies Of A Holding Or Parent Company Or An Incorporated Subsidiary That Operates Under A Firm Name Different From The Parent Company, Will Not Be Considered Under This Factor. part Ii: the Offeror Shall Include Narratives Addressing The Following Topics In Section H. Simply Re-stating This List In Section H Will Not Be Sufficient. The Narrative Of How The Firm Addresses Each Of These Will Be Evaluated. the Management Approach, Including Flow Of Communication And Roles/responsibilities. This Is Not The Organization Chart In D. the Coordination Of Disciplines And Subcontractors, Including Flow Of Communication And Hiring Practices design Quality Management/control Procedures, And familiarity With Va Design Guides/manuals, Master Specifications And Other Applicable Standards. professional Qualifications (sections C-e, G, H): Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service. The A-e Shall Demonstrate They Are Able To Sign And Stamp Each Drawing By Individuals Licensed In Any State In The United States For The Key Positions Listed Below. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm As Full-time Employees) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project, And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team When Evaluating Professional Qualifications. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. a Resume For Each Of These Key Positions Must Be Provided Via Section E In The Sf330. At Least One Resume Must Be Submitted For Each Of The Positions Below With The Role In This Contract Box Filled With A Title Matching This List. The Resume Shall State The Role The Specific Individual Filled On Each Project Listed, And Not A Generic Overview Of The Project. Each Project Must Also State If The Individual Worked On The Design Or Construction Period Services, Or Both. key Positions And Disciplines Required For This Project Include, But Are Not Limited To: architect (leed Certification/us Green Build Council Certification) registered Communications Distribution Designer (rcdd) cost Estimator civil Engineer electrical Engineer environmental Engineer certified Fire Protection Engineer certified Industrial Hygienist mechanical Engineer plumbing Engineer project Manager quality Assurance Manager structural Engineer physical Security Specialists [must Hold The Certified Protection Professional (cpp) Or Physical Security Professional (psp) Certification Issued By Asis International commissioning Agent section G Will Used To Evaluate The Prior Experience Of The Prime Firm And Any Key Subcontractors Working Together On The Provided Relevant Projects. include Documentation That Demonstrates Your Firm Has Discussed This Opportunity With Each Subcontractor And Agreed To A Part Ii Being Submitted As A Proposed Subcontractor. offer Must Include The Following Signed Statement Of Sdvosb Compliance In Section H When Submitting The Personnel Proposed To Perform The Work Under This Requirement: I ____[signatory Authority Name] __________, Of _____[company Name] ______, Certify That The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance To Firms That Are Not Certified Sdvosbs By The Small Business Association S Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) In Compliance Of Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 852.219-75. signature: _______________________________ the Information Provided In Sections C-e, G, And H Of Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate This Evaluation Factor. capacity (section H): The Evaluation Will Consider The Firm S Ability To Meet The Schedule Of The Overall Project, As Well As The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time. Provide The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines By Providing Current Project Workload, Inclusive Of All Projects Awarded By The Va, Any Federal Agency, And Private Sector, During The Previous Twelve (12) Months. Include The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts The Prime Firm Has Been Awarded From Any Source. Offeror Shall Clearly State Their Available Capacity Presenting Workload Percentages For The Key Disciplines And/or Team Members. Also, The Offeror Must Provide The Completion Percentages And Expected Completion Date For The Va Projects Awarded In The Previous Twelve (12) Months. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Please Ensure The Capacity Applies Toward The Team/personnel Provided In The Sf 330. past Performance (section H): Past Performance Will Be Evaluated On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. You Are Required To Provide The Documented Past Performance Evaluation On Each Project In Section F With A Matching Contract/task Order Number As Part Of The Sf 330 Pdf Submission. Past Performance May Be Submitted From Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Database Or A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) If There Is Not A Cpars Available. The Firm Listed On The Past Performance Must Match The Firm Listed As Prime On The Section F Project. if The Firm (prime Or Subcontractor) Was Not The Prime Contractor On Any Project Submitted In The Sf330, A Ppq Must Be Submitted Listing Their Specific Role (key Disciplines) As A Subcontractor. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. In The Event That A Firm Does Not Receive A Requested Complete Ppq From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed, And Proof That The Request For The Ppq Was Made. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title And Contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. the Government May Consider Additional Performance Related Information Regarding The Firm, To Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Will Evaluate The Past Performance Of A Joint Venture; If None Exists, The Past Performance Of Each Partner Will Be Evaluated. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. If Appropriate, The Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services May Be Evaluated. failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Contract Numbers, Or Valid Phone Numbers Will Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. for Ppqs, Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document. Completed Ppqs Should Be Incorporated Into The Sf 330 Directly. Ppqs Should Not Be Submitted To The Vha Pcac Directly. Any Ppqs Will Not Be Counted Towards The Page Limitations For This Submission. However, Any Narratives Provided For Past Performance In Section H Will Be Counted Toward The Page Limit. knowledge Of Locality (section H): Knowledge Of The Locality, To Include Specific Knowledge Of Certain Local Conditions Or Project Site Features, Such As Geological Features, Climatic Conditions, Working With And Local Construction Methods Or Local Laws And Regulations. this Is A Narrative To Understand What Experience The Firm Has In The Project Area. Please Do Not Only Submit A Map Demonstrating Office Locations Of Prime And Subcontractors As This Is Not A Narrative And Does Not Meet The Intent Of This Factor. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. note That The Intent Of This Factor Is To Showcase A Firm S Understanding Of The Site And Locality, And Not Where The Firm Is Located, How Far Away The Firm/branch Office Is From The Site, And How They Would Travel To The Site. Information Related To The Firm S Location Shall Instead Be Provided In Section H Under Secondary Selection Criterion Factor 1, Geographic Location. See Below. experience In Construction Period Services (section H): Experience In Construction Period Services Must Be Demonstrated Via Project Experience. These May Be The Same Projects Identified Above In Factor 1; However, The Firm Shall Clearly Delineate The Types Of Construction Period Services Performed For Each. Refer To The Statement Of Work For Review Timeline Expectations. The Firm Shall Provide A Detailed Description Of Projects Worked That Illustrate Experience In These Areas. Projects Must Be Within The Last Ten (10) Years. project Descriptions Must Include Experience With: solicitation Support Services, professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period coordination With Commissioning Requirements review Of Construction Submittals support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Cost Estimates attendance At Weekly Conference Calls providing Minutes Of Meetings Between The Ae, Va, And Contractors pre-final Inspection Site Visits generation Of Punch-list Reports, And production Of As-built Documentation. in Addition, The Firm Must Include A Description Of Experience Addressing Unforeseen Conditions And Emergent Situations, Conducting Situation Evaluations And Make Midcourse Corrections. Include Description On How The Firm Can Be Proactive Or Responsive In These Situations, And What The Process Is To Resolve Issues. the Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. secondary Selection Criterion*: geographic Location. Location Of The Firm, As Measured By The Driving Distance (miles) Between The Offeror S Principal Business Location And The Va Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park Division Campus, 795 Willow Rd, Menlo Park, Ca 94025. Determination Of The Mileage Will Be Based On Google Maps (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/). * The Secondary Selection Criterion Is Used As A Tiebreaker, If Necessary, In Ranking The Most Highly Qualified Firms Following The Completion Of Discussions. The Secondary Selection Criterion Will Not Be Applied When Determining A Firm S Sf 330 Submission. 5. Submission Requirements: the Below Information Contains The Instructions And Format That Must Be Followed For The Submission Of The Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications: submit One (1) Sf 330 Statement Of Qualifications To Contract Specialist Kaylan Grove At Kaylan.grove@va.gov And Contract Officer Jennifer Salerno-diciuccio At Jennifer.salerno-diciuccio@va.gov. This Must Include Parts I And Ii And Any Applicable Attachments. the Submission Must Include The Sf 330, Architect-engineer Qualifications (form Is Available Online At Https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms/architectengineer-qualifications ). the Sf 330 Submission Is Due By 1:00 Pm Et On November 12, 2024. the Sf 330 Must Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted. the Subject Line Of The Email Must Read: Sf 330 Submission - 36c77625r0009 Ehrm Infrastructure Upgrades Menlo Park. the Sf 330 Submission Must Not Exceed A Total Of 50 Pages. This Includes Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information. Any Pages Submitted By An Offeror That Exceed The Limit Will Not Be Considered During The Evaluation. Each Page Must Be In Arial Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. Part Ii Of The Sf 330 And Any Cpars Or Ppqs Will Not Count Toward The Page Limitation. a Ppq Obtained For Another Sf 330 Submission May Be Submitted For This Project. However, If Significant Portions Of The Project Have Been Completed Since The Ppq Was Filled Out, A New Ppq Should Be Submitted To Accurately Assess The Project. firms Must Include The Following Information In Section B Of The Sf 330 Submission: 1) Sam Unique Entity Identifier 2) Tax Id Number 3) Cage Code 4) Primary Point Of Contact S Email Address And Phone Number all Questions Must Be Submitted To Kaylan.grove@va.gov And Jennifer.salerno-diciuccio@va.gov With The Subject Line Sf 330 Questions - 36c77625r0009 Ehrm Infrastructure Upgrades Menlo Park The Cutoff For Question Submission Is 1:00 Pm Et On November 12th, 2024. Questions Will Be Answered Through Modification To The Pre-sol Notice Posted To Contract Opportunities At Sam.gov. this Procurement Is A 100% Set-aside For Sdvosb Concerns. Offers Received From Other Than Sdvosbs Will Not Be Considered. Offerors Must Be Certified As Sdvosbs By The U.s. Small Business Administration (sba) And Visible In The Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/) At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award. Failure To Be Certified In The Vetcert Database At These Times Will Result In The Offeror Being Deemed Ineligible For Award. all Joint Ventures Must Be Sba Certified At The Time Of Sf 330 Submission, Written Response Submission, And Award And Must Submit Agreements That Comply With 13 Cfr 128.402 Prior To Contract Award. all Prime Firms Must Meet The Naics Code Requirement Specified In This Notice. The Contracting Officer Will Verify The Naics Code In Vetcert. Failure To Meet The Naics Code Requirement May Result In The Rejection Of The Sf 330 Submission. sf 330 Submissions Received After The Date And Time Specified Will Not Be Considered. Late Proposal Rules Per Far 15.208 Will Be Followed For Late Submittals. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Not Be Evaluated. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf 330 Submission Package. it Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Contract Opportunities Website At Sam.gov For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submitting Their Sf 330.

Details: Notice Of Intent To Award Sole Source: the Department Of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Integrated Service Networks (visns) 1, 2, 4 And 5, Hereby Provides Notice Of Its Intent To Award A Sole-source, Federal Supply Schedule (fss) Blanket Purchase Agreement (bpa) To Data Innovations Llc. The Period Of Performance For Agreement Shall Be From August 1, 2024, To July 31, 2025, With The Provision Of Three (3) Options. A Justification And Approval For Other Than Full And Open Competition Will Be Prepared. this Requirement Is To Provide An Efficient Procurement Vehicle For Upgrading Existing Middleware For Interfacing Clinical Laboratory Systems (data Innovations) For Medical Centers Within Veterans Integrated Service Networks (visns) 1, 2, 4 And 5. naics Code: 513210 Software Publishers this Notice Of Intent Is Not A Request For Competitive Quotes. However, Interested Parties May Identify Their Interest And Capability To Respond To This Requirement No Later Than May 20, 2024, At 2:00 Pm, Eastern Time (edt). a Determination Not To Compete This Requirement, Based Upon Responses To This Notice, Is Solely Within The Discretion Of The Government. Information Received Will Normally Be Considered Solely For Determining Whether To Conduct A Competitive Procurement. the Department Of Veterans Affairs Will Not Be Responsible For Any Costs Incurred By Interested Parties In Responding To This Notice Of Intent. Only Written Responses Will Be Considered. All Responses From Responsible Sources Will Be Fully Considered. As A Result Of Analyzing Responses To This Notice Of Intent, The Government Shall Determine If A Solicitation Will Be Issued. Any Prospective Contractor Must Be Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) To Be Eligible For Award. interested Parties Are Encouraged To Furnish Information By Email Only With Response To Intent To Sole Source 36c24224q0661 Middleware For Interfacing Clinical Laboratory Systems With Vista In The Subject Line. All Documents Submitted Will Not Be Returned. All Interested Parties Shall Submit Clear And Convincing Documentation Demonstrating Their Capabilities To Satisfy The Requirements Listed Below To Contract Specialist, Lisa Harris, By Email At Lisa.harris4@va.gov. The Capability Documentation Should Include General Information And Technical Background Describing In Detail The Prospective Contractor's Capabilities And Experience That Will Demonstrate The Ability To Support The Requirements Detailed Below. middleware For Interfacing Clinical Laboratory Systems With Vista blanket Purchase Agreement (bpa) visns 1, 2, 4 And 5 Diagnostics / Laboratory Integrated Clinical Community (icc) background: the Purpose For This Bpa Is To Provide An Efficient Procurement Vehicle For Upgrading Existing Middleware For Interfacing Clinical Laboratory Systems (data Innovations) For Medical Centers Within Veterans Integrated Service Networks (visns) 1, 2, 4 And 5. The Data Innovations Systems Interface With Vista/ Computerized Patient Record System (cprs) For The Ordering And Subsequent Reporting Of Patient Lab Data. This System Is A Communication Hub That Monitors, And Routes Messages Based On User-specified Criteria. Visns 1, 2, 4 And 5 Are Requesting A Blanket Purchase Agreement (bpa) For Middleware System Hardware And Software To Upgrade Current Systems. introduction in The Spirit Of The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, The Department Of Veterans Affairs (dva) And data Innovations Llc. Hereby Enter Into A Cooperative Agreement, Otherwise Referred To As A Bpa, To Further Reduce The Administrative Costs Of Acquiring Supplies/services From The General Services Administration (gsa) Federal Supply Schedule Contract No. Gs35f389da (data Innovations). Federal Supply Schedule Contract Bpa's Eliminate Contracting And Open Market Costs Such As: Search For Sources; The Development Of Technical Documents, Solicitations, And The Evaluation Of Offers. Teaming Arrangements Are Permitted With Federal Supply Schedule Contractors In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 9.6. The Agreement Details All Supplies And Services With Accompanying Prices And Descriptions, Which May Be Ordered Under This Bpa. terms And Conditions all Orders Placed Against This Bpa Are Subject To The Terms And Conditions Of The Gsa/fss Contract Including All Clauses And Provisions Whether In Full Text Or Incorporated By Reference. pursuant To Gsa/fss, Regarding Bpa, The Contractor Agrees To The Following Terms Of A (bpa) Exclusively With The Department Of Veterans Affairs. the Government May Accept Any Item Or Group Of Items Of An Offer, Unless The Offeror Qualifies The Offer By Specific Limitations. Unless Otherwise Provided In The Schedule, Offers May Not Be Submitted For Quantities Less Than Those Specified. The Government Reserves The Right To Make An Award On Any Item For A Quantity Less Than The Quantity Offered, At The Unit Prices Offered, Unless The Offeror Specifies Otherwise In The Offer. technical Requirements vendor Will Perform The Following: upgrades, Enhancements, And Maintenance That Interface With The Current Data Innovations Infrastructure At Each Location Include The Following Requirements: install The Latest Released Version Of Instrument Manager Onto Customer Provisioned Im Production, High Availability, Reports And Test Servers And Assist With Database And Soft License Migration As Needed assist With Archiving Setup On Im Production Server assist With Installing Im Thin Client Application On Identified Workstations assist With User Security Setup assist With Interfacing Of Vista Test System With Im Test System assist With The Installation And Setup Of The Nationally-approved Vista Auto-verification Driver design And Implement Auto-verification (av) Rule Sets For Two (2) Unique High Complexity Instrument Workflow Configurations And Two (2) Unique Low Complexity Instrument Workflow, Based On Data Provided From Lab Standard Operating Procedures ( Sops ), Which May Include One Or More Of The Following Categorical Rules Types: qc Rules/hold For Qc (unity Real-time Integration) rerun Result Comparison Processing error Flag Processing serum Indices Processing result Format Processing reference Range Processing critical Results Processing rerun Processing delta Check Processing calculation Processing specimen Integrity Processing reflex Test Processing lis Format Processing validate Or Hold For Review Processing provide Tutorial On Rule Set Maintenance provide Tutorial On Creation And Execution Of Test Cases Within The Im Rules Engine provide Guidance On Rules Validation Techniques And Assist With Troubleshooting And/or Modifying Rules, As Needed, During The Validation Phase assist With Creation And Customization Of Specimen Management Workspaces To Manage Test Results assist With Configuration Of Up To Ten (10) Moving Average ( Ma ) Protocols ( Protocols ) assist With Setup Of Result Hold Criteria For Ma Violations With Notifier Light Pole Setup assist With Setup Of Laboratory Intelligence Report Server assist With Any Communication Issues That Arise provide Perpetual Licensing And Services To Install configure Up To Six (6) Laboratory Intelligence Widgets Which Capture And Display Desired Auto-verification Performance Metrics provide Tutorial On Laboratory Intelligence setup Odbc Driver Configuration And Interface For Later Ep Evaluator Configuration provide Site Specific Days Of Dedicated Go-live Assistance For Av (3 Per Av Workflow) upgrade To Latest Released Version Of Im Onto Im Production, Disaster Recover And Test Instances Onto Customer-provided Servers (as Required) development And Implementation Of Auto-verification (av) Rule Sets For Two (2) Unique High Complexity Instrument Workflow Configurations And Two (2) Unique Low Complexity Instrument Workflow specimen Management Workspaces Configured For Reviewing Rules-held Results On Instruments Configured For Auto-verification tutorial On Rules Maintenance, Rules Testing Techniques, And Specimen Management Workspaces remote Testing And Troubleshooting Support In Preparation For Go-live laboratory Intelligence Server Configured With Up To Six (6) Auto Verification Performance Indicators (kpis) up To Ten (10) Ma Protocols Setup With Moving Medians Calculation Applied As Applicable ma Violations With Notifier Light Pole Setup odbc Driver Configuration And Interface Setup For Later Ep Evaluator Configuration up Site Specific Days Of Onsite Go Live Support (3 Per Av Workflow) locations this List Of Locations Is For Reference Only. There May Be Locations Not Yet On The List Or Locations Added During The Term Of The Bpa. visn 1 Stations 402 maine Va Medical Center 1 Va Center augusta, Me 04330 405 white River Junction Va Medical Center 215 North Main Street white River Junction, Vt 05009 518 edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital 200 Springs Road bedford, Ma 01730 523 va Boston Healthcare System - Brockton 940 Belmont Street brockton, Ma 02301 523 va Boston Healthcare System - West Roxbury 1400 Vfw Parkway west Roxbury, Ma 02132 631 va Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System 421 North Main Street leeds, Ma 01053 689 va Connecticut Healthcare System - West Haven 950 Campbell Avenue west Haven, Ct 06516 visn 2 Stations 526 new York/new Jersey Va Health Care Network 130 W. Kingsbridge Road, Building 16 bronx, Ny 10468 528 va Western New York Healthcare System - Buffalo 3495 Bailey Avenue buffalo, Ny 14215 528a4 batavia Va Medical Center 222 Richmond Avenue batavia, Ny 14020-1227 528a5 canandaigua Va Medical Center 400 Fort Hill Avenue canandaigua, Ny 14424 528a6 bath Va Medical Center 76 Veterans Avenue bath, Ny 14810 528a7 syracuse Va Medical Center 800 Irving Avenue syracuse, Ny 13210 528a8 albany Stratton Va Medical Center 113 Holland Avenue albany, Ny 12208 561 va New Jersey Healthcare System - East Orange 385 Tremont Avenue east Orange, Nj 07018 620 va Hudson Valley Healthcare System - Castle Point 41 Castle Point Rd wappingers Falls, Ny 12590 620 va Hudson Valley Healthcare System - Montrose 2094 Albany Post Road montrose, Ny 10548 630 va Ny Harbor Healthcare System - Brooklyn 800 Poly Place brooklyn, Ny 11209 632 northport Va Medical Center 79 Middleville Road northport, Ny 11768 visn 4 Stations 460 wilmington Va Medical Center 1601 Kirkwood Highway wilmington, De 19805 503 altoona Va Medical Center 2907 Pleasant Valley Blvd altoona, Pa 16602 529 butler Va Health Care System 353 North Duffy Road butler, Pa 16001 542 coatesville Veterans Affairs Medical Center 1400 Blackhorse Hill Road coatesville, Pa 19320 562 erie Va Medical Center 135 East 38th Street Boulevard erie, Pa 16504 595 lebanon Va Medical Center 1700 South Lincoln Avenue lebanon, Pa 17042 642 corporal Michael J. Crescenz Va Medical Center 3900 Woodland Avenue philadelphia, Pa 19104 646 va Pittsburgh Healthcare System - University Drive university Drive pittsburgh, Pa 15240 646?? va Pittsburgh Healthcare System - H.j. Heinz 1010 Delafield Road pittsburgh, Pa 15215 693 wilkes-barre Va Medical Center 1111 East End Blvd. wilkes-barre, Pa 18711 visn 5 Stations 512 va Maryland Healthcare System 10 N Greene St baltimore, Md 21201 517 beckley Va Medical Center 200 Veterans Ave beckley Wv 25801-6444 540 louis A. Johnson Va Medical Center 1 Medical Center Drive Clarksburg Wv 26301 581 hershel "woody" Williams Va Medical Center 1540 Spring Valley Drive huntington Wv 25704 613 martinsburg Va Medical Center 510 Butler Avenue martinsburg Wv 25405 688 washington Dc Va Medical Center 50 Irving Street, Nw washington Dc 20422

Details: 1. Requirements For The Transfer Of Medication Plans: --- The Provider Of A Pdms For Intensive Care Unit/imc/awr/op Must Ensure That The Digital Medication Process In The Intensive Care Unit/imcawr/op When Transferred From Another Organizational Unit (e.g. Normal Ward) And Back Can Be Continued Digitally Without Manual Intervention And All Data Can Be Used In A Structured Form. The Medication Information Of The Organizational Unit Must Be Able To Be Electronically Transferred And Continued In The Pdms (including Preparation, Active Substance, Pharmaceutical Central Number, Dosage, Dosage Unit, Time Interval, Administration Time, Start Of Therapy, Tube Accessibility, Divisibility, Application Route, Carrier Solution). The Digital Medication Process Must Apparently Be Interrupted Or Passed On Transfer When A Patient Is Transferred To Icu/imc/awr/or. --- In The Intensive Care Unit/imc/awr/op, The Digital Medication Process, Including The Digital Control Process And Drug Therapy Safety Check (amts), Is Continued. When A Patient Is Transferred To An External Organizational Unit, The Digital Medication Process In The Intensive Care Unit/imc/awr/op Is Terminated. The Medication Information From The Pdms Must Be Able To Be Transferred And Continued Electronically On The External Organizational Unit Completely Digitally And Without Interface Losses (e.g. Normal Ward). --- 2. Requirements For The Depiction Of Medication Plans In The Intensive Care Unit: --- Medication And Infusion Plans Should Depict The Following Attributes: - Active Substance / Preparation - Dosage / Concentration - Dosage Unit - Quantity - Application Times Per Day - Application Times On Weekdays/weeks /months - Start Of The Order - End Of The Order (optional To Be Determined In Advance) - Pauses (single Doses Or Periods In Which The Drug Is Suspended) - Discontinuation (before A Possibly Fixed End Of The Order) - Notes/messenger (e.g. For Ward Pharmacists , Antibiotic Stewardship) An Infusion Plan Has The Following Attributes: -- Type: Continuous Infusion/syringe Pump/short Infusion/free Volume -- Run Rate Or Total Volume -- Drug Addition (total Dose Or Concentration) -- Application Times Per Day -- Application Times On Weekdays/in Weeks/ Months -- Start Of Arrangement -- End Of Arrangement (optional To Be Determined In Advance) -- Pauses (single Doses Or Periods When Infusion Is Suspended) --- The Pdms Is Intended To Provide A Way To Review Current Medication Schedules For Drug Safety. An Office Subsystem Integrated Into The Cis Is To Be Included For Testing. Warnings Of Interactions, Contraindications, Or Dose Adjustments Are Intended To Be Given. In Addition, Data From The Laboratory Should Also Flow In (e.g. Gfr). --- The Pdms Should Offer A Way To Scan In Medication Plans (bmp, Emp, Ti) (e.g. Via Qr Code) --- The Solution Should Be Operated As A Kis Subsystem Or On Premise In Our Local Data Center Based On Our Vmware Virtualization Solution .. The Procurement Is Related To A Project And/or Programme Financed By European Union Funds: No

Details: The Rfq Number For This Announcement Is N0018924qz291. This Solicitation Documents And Incorporates Provisions And Clauses In Effect Through Fac 2024-04 And The Most Recent Dfars Publication Notice Made Effective 30 May 2024. It Is The Responsibility Of The Contractor To Be Familiar With The Applicable Clauses And Provisions. The Clauses May Be Accessed In Full Text At This Address: Https://www.acquisition.gov/far/. The Naics Code Is 513210 And The Small Business Standard Is 47 Million Dollars. The Proposed Simplified Acquisition Is Being Solicited On A Sole Source Basis With Tactical Communications Group (tcg), 2 Highwood Drive, Building 2 Suite 200, Tewksbury Massachusetts, 01876. the Navsup Flc Norfolk Contracting Dept, Pentagon Directorate Is Issuing This Combined Synopsis/solicitation To Procure Boss Single Link 16 Capable – Software For The Joint Staff (js) Joint Interoperability Division (jid)-training Center (tc). The Resultant Purchase Order For This Procurement Will Include Commercial-off-the-shelf (cots) Supplies And Services For Which The Government Intends To Solicit And Negotiate With Only Tactical Communications Group (tcg). The Government Will Not Pay For Information Submitted In The Response To This Notice. The Required Cots Supplies For Boss Single Link 16 Capable – Software Only, Loaded With Jreap Appendix C, Will Have A One-year Coverage Period Encompassing 29 July 2024- 28 July 2025. It Is Intended To Award A Sole Source Firm-fixed Price Purchase Order. the Proposed Contract Action Is For Supplies Or Services For Which The Government Intends To Solicit And Negotiate With Only One Source. Interested Persons May Identify Their Interest And Capability To Respond To The Requirement Or Submit Quotations. This Notice Of Intent Is Not A Request For Competitive Quotations. However, All Quotations Received Within Five Days After Date Of Publication Of This Synopsis Will Be Considered By The Government. A Determination By The Government Not To Compete This Proposed Purchase Order Based Upon Responses To This Notice Is Solely Within The Discretion Of The Government. Information Received Will Normally Be Considered Solely For The Purpose Of Determining Whether To Conduct A Competitive Procurement. this Is A Combined Synopsis/solicitation For Commercial Items Prepared In Accordance With The Information In Far Subpart 12.6, Using Simplified Acquisition Procedures Found At Far 13.5, As Supplemented With The Additional Information Included In This Notice. This Announcement Constitutes The Only Solicitation; A Separate Written Solicitation Will Not Be Issued. Paper Copies Of This Solicitation Will Not Be Available. The Closing Date And Time For Receipt Of The Quoter’s Quotation In Response To The Sole Source Combined Synopsis/solicitation Is 8 July 2024 At 12:00 Pm Est. The Quotation Shall Be Submitted Electronically Via Email To Kevin.mbrenna21.civ@us.navy.mil. the Software Specifications Are Listed Below. Furthermore, It Is Intended To Award A Single Purchase Order As A Result Of This Combined Synopsis/solicitation With The Following Clin Structure: clin 0001: Qty 1 Each, Boss Single Link- 16 Capable Software License, Coverage Period Is (1) Year Encompassing 29 July 2024 Through 28 July 2025. Part #tcg-2000 Sl. clin 0002: Qty 1 Each, Jreap Appendix C. Part #tcg-jreap C. shipping/billing: joint Interoperability & Data Link Training Center (jid-tc) 2449 Surveyor Street, Bldg. 718 fort Liberty, Nc 28308 billing: Attention: Debra Collins shipping: Attention: Christopher Nichols the Clause At 52.212-4 Contract Terms And Conditions-- Commercial Products And Commercial Services (nov 2021) Applies To This Acquisition Along With The Following Addenda To This Clause: clauses Incorporated By Reference: 52.203-12 limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions 52.204-7 system For Award Management 52.204-13 system For Award Management Maintenance 52.204-16 commercial And Government Entity Code Reporting 52.204-18 commercial And Government Entity Code Maintenance 52.204-22 alternative Line Item Proposal 52.209-10 prohibition On Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations 52.232-39 unenforceability Of Unauthorized Obligations 52.232-40 providing Accelerated Payments To Small Business Subcontractors 52.247-34 f.o.b. Destination 252.203-7000 requirements Relating To Compensation Of Former Dod Officials 252.203-7002 requirement To Inform Employees Of Whistleblower Rights 252.203-7003 agency Office Of The Inspector General 252.204-7004 antiterrorism Awareness Training For Contractors 252.204-7012 safeguarding Covered Defense Information And Cyber Incident Reporting 252.204-7015 notice Of Authorized Disclosure Of Information For Litigation Support 252.204-7018 prohibition On The Acquisition Of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment Or Services 252.225-7048 export-controlled Items 252.225-7056 prohibition Regarding Business Operations With The Maduro Regime 252.225-7060 prohibition On Certain Procurements From The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 252.232-7003 electronic Submission Of Payment Requests And Receiving Reports 252.232-7010 levies On Contract Payments 252.237-7010 prohibition On Interrogation Of Detainees By Contractor Personnel 252.244-7000 subcontracts For Commercial Products Or Commercial Services 252.247-7023 transportation Of Supplies By Sea 252.232-7006 Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (jan 2023) 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference (feb 1998) 52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated By Reference (feb 1998) 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls (oct 2016) 252.211-7003 Item Unique Identification And Valuation (jan 2023) 52.212-5 Contract Terms And Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or Executive Orders--commercial Products And Commercial Services (feb 2024) Applies To This Acquisition And The Following Additional Far Clauses Cited Within This Clause Are Also Applicable To This Acquisition: far 52.204-10, Far 52.209-6, Far 52.219-28, Far 52.222-3, Far 52.222-19, Far 52.222-21, Far 52.222-26, Far 52.222-36, Far 52.222-50, Far 52.223-18, Far 52.225-13, Far 52.232-33. 52.212-3 Offeror Representations And Certifications--commercial Products And Commercial Services (feb 2024), With Its Offer. Additionally, The Quoter Is Advised To Provide A Completed Copy Of The Following Additional Certifications And Representations. 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications And Video Surveillance Services Or Equipment(nov 2021) 52.204-26 Covered Telecommunications Equipment Or Services--representation (oct 2020) 252.203-7005 Representation Relating To Compensation Of Former Dod Officials (sep 2022) 252.204-7016 Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment Or Services -- representation (dec2019) 252.204-7017 Prohibition On The Acquisition Of Covered Defense Telecommunications equipment Or Services--representation (may 2021) 252.225-7055 Representation Regarding Business Operations With The Maduro Regime (may 2022) 252.225-7059 Prohibition On Certain Procurements From The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region - Representation (jun 2023) 52.212-1 Instructions To Offerors--commercial Products And Commercial Services (sep 2023) 52.212-2 Evaluation--commercial Products And Commercial Services (nov 2021) (a) The Government Will Award A Contract Resulting From This Solicitation On A Sole Source Basis To Tactical Communications Group (tgc), Llc (b) Options. Reserved. (c) A Written Notice Of Award Or Acceptance Of An Offer, Mailed Or Otherwise Furnished To The Successful Offeror Within The Time For Acceptance Specified In The Offer, Shall Result In A Binding Contract Without Further Action By Either Party. Before The Offer's Specified Expiration Time, The Government May Accept An Offer (or Part Of An Offer), Whether Or Not There Are Negotiations After Its Receipt, Unless A Written Notice Of Withdrawal Is Received Before Award.

Details: Date: March 4, 2024 Competitive Bid Issued By: Agriculture Financial Services Corporation Competitive Bids For: It Security Consultant To Provide Penetration Tests And Vulnerability Assessment For Afsc Competitive Bid #: Rfp 0696 Contracted Service: Penetration Test And Vulnerability Assessment Provider Closing: March 26, 2024 Afsc Buyer: Kathy Walker Title: Buyer, Business Services Address: Afsc Purchasing Department 5718 56th Avenue Lacombe, Alberta T4l 1b1 E-mail: Rfp@afsc.ca Table Of Contents: Terms And Conditions - 1 - 1.0 Introduction - 1 - 1.1 Definitions - 1 - 1.2 Mandatory Requirements And Desirable Provisions - 1 - 1.3 Confidentiality And Security Of Information - 2 - 1.4 Material Ownership - 2 - 1.5 Conflict Of Interest - 2 - 1.6 Inaccuracies Or Misrepresentations - 3 - 1.7 Inquiries - 3 - 1.8 Blackout Period - 4 - 1.9 Liability For Errors - 4 - 1.10 Notification Of Changes - 4 - 1.11 Vendor’s Expenses - 5 - 1.12 Short Listing - 5 - 1.13 Resource Replacement - 5 - 1.14 Freedom Of Information And Protection Of Privacy - 5 - 1.15 Reservation Of Rights - 6 - 1.16 Competitive Bid Administration - 6 - 1.17 Afsc’s Policies And Procedures For Security And Training On Site - 7 - 1.18 Vendor Debriefing - 7 - 2.0 Statement Of Work - 8 - 2.1 Introduction - 8 - 2.2 Background - 8 - 2.3 Objectives - 9 - 2.3.1 Penetration Testing Services - 9 - 2.3.1.1 Network Penetration Testing Services - 10 - 2.3.1.2 Application Penetration Testing Services - 10 - 2.3.1.3 Social Engineering Testing Services - 10 - 2.3.2 Vulnerability Assessment Services - 10 - 2.3.3 Web Application Penetration Testing Services - 11 - 2.3.4 Red Teaming Exercise - 11 - 2.3.5 Additional Services - 11 - 2.3.6 Security Policy Review. Continuous Threat Exposure Management (ctem) - 12 - 2.4 Duration - 12 - 2.5 Requirements - 12 - 2.5.1 Preferred Requirements - 12 - 2.5.2 Optional Requirements - 16 - 2.5.3 Training - 18 - 2.6 Corporate Capabilities And Executive Summary - 18 - 2.7 Resources - 18 - 2.8 Value Add - 19 - 2.9 Approach - 19 - 2.10 Security - 20 - 2.10.1 Data Classification - 20 - 2.11 Technology Information - 20 - 2.12 Documentation - 20 - 2.13 Additional Information - 21 - 2.14 Disclosure - 22 - 2.15 Pricing - 22 - 3.0 Evaluation - 23 - 4.0 Contract Review - 26 - 4.1 Negotiations - 27 - 5.0 Master Schedule - 27 - 6.0 Proposal Submission Guidelines - 29 - 6.1 Proposal Format - 29 - 6.2 Proposal Submissions - 31 - Terms And Conditions 1.0 Introduction Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (afsc) Is An Alberta Provincial Crown Corporation Under The Ministry Of Agriculture And Irrigation. Afsc’s Core Programs Include Business Risk Management Programs And Services To The Agriculture Industry As Well As Lending Products And Services To Farmers’ Agribusinesses, Value Added Enterprises And Commercial Operations. More Detailed Information About Afsc Is Available On The Website Www.afsc.ca. The Objective Of This Competitive Bid Is For Afsc To Solicit Proposals From Those Qualified In Providing The Specified Services Described Under Section 2.0 Of This Competitive Bid. 1.1 Definitions The Following Abbreviations And Terminology Are Used Throughout This Competitive Bid: Term Description Personnel Employees, Contractors, Subcontractors And Agents Of The Vendor. Vendor Any Business That Is Registered In Canada And Is Authorized To Operate In Alberta, Proposing To Submit A Proposal To The Competitive Bid. Competitive Bid Competitive Bid (rfp), Request For Quote (rfq), Value Based Request (vbr), Notice Of Proposed Procurement (npp), Request For Information (rfi), Request For Comment (rfc) Statement Of Work The Services Required By This Competitive Bid As Described In Section 2.0 Of This Competitive Bid. Contract Monitor Afsc Representative That Will Be Responsible For The Management Of The Contract That May Result From This Competitive Bid. 1.2 Mandatory Requirements And Desirable Provisions Proposals That Do Not Comply With The Competitive Bid Requirements Will Be Rejected. “must”, “shall”, “mandatory” And “will” Mean A Requirement That Must Be Met In Order For The Proposal To Receive Consideration. For Mandatory Requirements, The Vendor Must Provide Sufficient Information In The Proposals To Sustain Compliance To The Competitive Bid’s Mandatory Requirements. “should” And “desirable” Mean A Provision Having A Significant Degree Of Importance To The Objectives Of The Competitive Bid. For Desirable/optional Provisions, The Vendor’s Proposal Should Provide Details Of How The Desirable/optional Provisions Are Addressed. 1.3 Confidentiality And Security Of Information The Vendor And The Vendor’s Personnel Shall: A) Keep Strictly Confidential All Information Concerning Afsc Or Third Parties, Or Any Of The Business Or Activities Of Afsc Or Third Parties Acquired As Result Of Participation In The Competitive Bid; B) Only Use, Copy Or Disclose Such Information As Necessary For The Purpose Of Submitting A Proposal Or Upon Written Authorization Of Afsc. The Vendor Shall Maintain Security Standards, Including Control Of Access To Data And Other Information, Consistent With The Highest Standards Of Business Practice In The Vendor’s Industry. 1.4 Material Ownership Ownership In All Materials Including Copyright, Patent, Trade Secret, Industrial Design Or Trademark That Are Made, Prepared, Developed, Generated, Produced Or Acquired Under Or In Relation To The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract By The Vendor, The Vendor’s Employees, Subcontractors Or Agents Belongs To Afsc As They Are Made, Prepared, Developed, Generated, Produced Or Acquired. Any Such Materials Shall Be Delivered To Afsc Upon Completion Or Termination Of The Competitive Bid. The Vendor: A) Irrevocably Waives In Whole All Moral Rights. B) Shall Ensure That Its Employees, Subcontractors, And Agents Irrevocably Waive In Whole All Moral Rights To The Materials Made, Prepaid, Developed, Generated Produced, Or Acquired Under The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract And Declares That These Waivers Shall Operate In Favour Of Afsc And Afsc’s Assignees And Licenses. 1.5 Conflict Of Interest Vendor(s) Must Fully Disclose, In Writing To Afsc On Or Before The Closing Date Of The Competitive Bid, The Circumstances Of Any Possible Conflict Of Interest Or What Could Be Perceived As A Possible Conflict Of Interest If The Vendor Were To Become A Contracting Party Pursuant To The Competitive Bid. Afsc Will Review Any Submissions By Vendor(s) Under This Provision And May Reject Any Proposals Where, In The Sole Opinion Of Afsc, The Vendor Could Be In A Conflict Of Interest Or Could Be Perceived To Be In A Possible Conflict Of Interest Position If The Vendor Were To Become A Contracting Party Pursuant To The Competitive Bid. 1.6 Inaccuracies Or Misrepresentations If, During The Competitive Bidding Process, Afsc Determines That The Vendor Has Made A Material Misstatement Or Misrepresentation Or That Materially Inaccurate Information Has Been Provided To Afsc, The Vendor Will Be Disqualified From The Competitive Bidding Process. 1.7 Inquiries All Inquiries Related To This Competitive Bid Must Be Addressed To The Afsc Buyer On Or Before The Date Specified In The Master Schedule And As Per The Following: A) Inquiries Must Be Sent By E-mail To The Afsc Buyer At Rfp@afsc.ca, Utilizing The Q&a Template Provided. B) No Telephone Inquiries Will Be Accepted. C) No Additional Information Or Clarifications Will Be Provided To Inquiries Received After The Applicable Deadline. D) To Be Considered, All Inquiries Must Provide The Following Vendor Information: • Name Of Primary Contact • Address • Telephone Number • E-mail Address • Competitive Bid Reference Number. E) All Inquiries Received Will Be Reviewed By Afsc. F) All Inquiries Will Be Compiled And Answered In The Form Of Written Addendum(s) Issued By Afsc Via Alberta Purchasing Connection (apc) To All Prospective Vendor(s). G) Vendor(s) Are Advised That All Inquiries Answered By Afsc Will Be Provided Verbatim In Writing To All Prospective Vendor(s). H) Inquiries That May Contain Proprietary Or Confidential Information Of A Vendor May Be Answered Exclusively To The Submitting Vendor (afsc Will Direct The Correspondence Regarding This Inquiry Only To The Vendor’s Primary Contact) Provided The Addendum Does Not: • Require A Modification To This Competitive Bid; Or • Potentially Provide An Undue Advantage In The Competitive Process. I) If Either Of The Above Situations (h) Arises, Afsc Reserves The Right To: • Request The Vendor Reword And Resubmit The Inquiry; Or • Decline To Provide A Response. J) Afsc Reserves The Right To Not Disclose Information In Conjunction With This Competitive Bid On Any Inquiry That Requires Releasing Information That Afsc, In Its Sole Discretion, Regards As Confidential To Afsc. K) Afsc Reserves The Right In Any Event To Decline To Provide A Proposal For Any Reason In Its Sole Discretion. L) It Is The Vendor’s Responsibility To Notify Afsc, In Writing, And In Advance, Of Any Change In The Vendor(s) Primary Contact Information. M) Afsc Assumes No Responsibility Or Liability Arising From Information Obtained In A Manner Other Than As Described In This Competitive Bid. 1.8 Blackout Period With Respect To The Competitive Bid, Afsc Prohibits Communications Initiated By A Vendor To Any Afsc Employee, Other Than The Purchasing Department, For The Period Of Time From The Submission Date Of The Competitive Bid Up To And Including The Date Of Contract Award Resulting From This Competitive Bid. Any Communication Between A Vendor And Afsc During The Blackout Period Will Be Initiated By Afsc, In Writing, For The Purpose Of Obtaining Information Or Clarification Necessary To Ensure A Proper And Accurate Evaluation Of The Proposal. Any Communication Initiated By A Vendor During The Blackout Period May Be Grounds For Disqualifying The Offending Vendor From Further Consideration For The Acquisition And/or Any Future Afsc Solicitations. Afsc Will Notify All Vendors Upon Award Of A Contract From This Requisition. Accordingly, Vendors Are Asked To Refrain From Requesting Status Updates During The Proposal Evaluation Process. Vendors Who Are Currently Engaged In An Active Contract With Afsc May Continue To Communicate Directly With The Afsc Contract Monitor As It Relates To Activities Covered Under The Active Contract. 1.9 Liability For Errors While Every Effort Is Taken To Ensure An Accurate Representation Of Information In This Competitive Bid, Afsc Shall Not Be Liable Or Accountable For Any Error Or Omission In Any Part Of This Competitive Bid. 1.10 Notification Of Changes Any Changes To This Competitive Bid, As Well As The Response(s) To Inquiries, Will Be Posted As An Addendum On The Alberta Purchasing Connection (apc). Vendors Should Routinely Check Apc For Amendments And Adhere To Any Amendment Requirements. In The Event Of A Directed Competitive Bid, Vendors Should Routinely Check The Email Address The Bid Was Delivered To For Amendments. 1.11 Vendor’s Expenses Vendors Are Solely Responsible For Their Own Expenses In Preparing The Proposal, As Well As Any Subsequent Proposals, Including Any Costs Associated With Attendance To Information Sessions, Site Tours Or A Potential Short-listed Vendor’s Interview With Afsc. 1.12 Short Listing A Shortlist Of Vendors May Be Established. Short Listed Vendors May Be Requested To Make Formal Presentations, Regarding Their Proposal To Afsc. Key Vendor Management And Technical Personnel Will Be Expected To Participate In The Presentations. This Process Is Used To Validate Claims Made In The Proposal And Confirm The Vendor’s Ability To Meet The Requirements In The Competitive Bid. These Presentations Must Be Made At No Cost To Afsc. Based On Information Obtained At The Presentation, Vendors’ Scores May Be Adjusted. 1.13 Resource Replacement Resource Replacement Is Not Encouraged, However, There Could Be Circumstances Following The Competitive Bids Closing Date And Prior To Contract Execution That A Vendor May Request That A Proposed Resource Be Replaced. Any Proposed Resource Replacement Must Have, In The Opinion Of Afsc, Equivalent Or Better Qualifications Than The Originally Proposed Resource. Vendors Will Not Receive Additional Credit In The Evaluation Process If The Qualifications Of The Replacement Resource Exceed Those Of The Original Resource. Afsc Reserves The Right To Deny Any Request For Replacement And Reject Any Proposed Replacement. 1.14 Freedom Of Information And Protection Of Privacy The Vendor Acknowledges That: A) The Freedom Of Information And Protection Of Privacy Act Of Alberta (foip) Applies To All Information And Records Relating To, Or Obtained, Generated, Created, Collected Or Provided Under The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract And Which Are In The Custody Or Control Of Afsc. Foip Allows Any Person A Right Of Access To Records In Afsc’s Custody Or Control, Subject To Limited And Specific Exceptions As Set Out In Foip. B) Foip Imposes An Obligation On Afsc, And Through The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract On The Vendor(s), To Protect The Privacy Of Individuals To Whom Information Relates. The Vendor(s) Will Protect The Confidentiality And Privacy Of Any Individual’s Personal Information Accessible To The Vendor(s) Or Collected By The Vendor(s) Pursuant To The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract. C) The Vendor(s), If It Considers Portions Of Its Proposal To Be Confidential, Will Identify Those Parts Of Its Proposal To Afsc Considered To Be Confidential And What Harm Could Reasonably Be Expected From Disclosure. Afsc Does Not Warrant That This Identification Will Preclude Disclosure Under Foip. D) Materials Produced By The Vendor(s), In Connection With Or Pursuant To The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract, Which Are The Property Afsc Pursuant To The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract, Could Be Considered Records Under The Control Of A Public Body And Could Therefore Also Be Subject To The Foip Before Delivery To Afsc. As Such, The Vendor Must Conduct Itself To A Standard Consistent With Foip In Relation To Such Materials. E) For The Records And Information Obtained Or Possessed By The Vendor(s) In Connection With Or Pursuant To The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract, And Which Are In The Custody Or Control Of Afsc, The Vendor(s) Must Conduct Itself To A Standard Consistent With Foip When Providing The Services Or Carrying Out The Duties Or Other Obligations Of The Vendor Under The Competitive Bid And Any Subsequent Contract. The Purpose For Collecting Personal Information For The Competitive Bid Is To Enable Afsc To Ensure The Accuracy And Reliability Of The Information, To Evaluate The Proposal, And For Other Related Program Purposes Of Afsc. Authority For This Collection Is The Government Organization Act, As Amended From Time To Time. The Vendor(s) May Contact The Buyer Identified In The Competitive Bid Regarding Any Questions About Collection Of Information Pursuant To The Competitive Bid. 1.15 Reservation Of Rights Afsc Reserves The Right In Its Sole Discretion To: A) Accept Or Reject Any Or All Proposals. B) Disqualify A Vendor In The Event That, In Afsc’s Opinion, The Proposal Does Not Contain Sufficient Information To Permit A Thorough Evaluation. C) Verify The Validity Of The Information Supplied And To Reject Any Proposal Where The Contents Appear To Be Incorrect Or Inaccurate In Afsc’s Estimation. D) Seek Proposal Clarification At Any Time With Vendor(s) To Assist In Making Evaluations. E) Accept Proposals In Whole Or In Part. F) Accept A Proposal With Only Minor Non-compliance. G) Retain One Copy And Destroy And Dispose Of All Other Copies Of Any And All Proposals Received By Afsc. H) Cancel This Competitive Bid Process At Any Stage, Without Award Or Compensation To Vendors, Their Officers, Directors, Employees Or Agents, Without Assigning Any Reasons. 1.16 Competitive Bid Administration The Proposal Must Indicate That The Vendor Accepts The Procedures Set Down In This Competitive Bid. In Accordance With This Competitive Bid, The Vendor, If It Considers Portions Of Its Proposal To Be Confidential, Shall Identify Those Parts Of Its Proposal To Afsc Considered To Be Confidential And What Harm Could Reasonably Be Expected From Disclosure. Afsc Does Not Warrant That This Identification Will Preclude Disclosure Under Foip. 1.17 Afsc’s Policies And Procedures For Security And Training On Site The Vendor, Its Employees, Subcontractors, And Agents When Using Any Of Afsc’s Buildings, Premises, Equipment, Hardware Or Software Shall Comply With All Safety And Security Policies, Regulations Or Directives Relating To Those Buildings, Premises, Equipment, Hardware Or Software That Are Promulgated By Afsc From Time To Time. The Vendor’s Employees, Subcontractors And Agents Shall Comply, As Applicable, With All Provisions Of The Alberta Occupational Health And Safety Act, Occupational Health And Safety Regulation And Occupational Health And Safety Code With Respect To The Provision Of Services And Materials. When The Workers’ Compensation Act (alberta), As Amended, Applies, And Upon Request From Afsc, Deliver To Afsc A Certificate From The Workers’ Compensation Board Showing That The Vendor Is Registered And In Good Standing With The Board. 1.18 Vendor Debriefing The Corporate Purchasing Section Will, At The Request Of An Unsuccessful Vendor Who Responded To This Competitive Bid, Conduct A Debriefing After Contract Award For The Purpose Of Informing The Vendor On The Reasons Their Proposal Was Not Selected.   2.0 Statement Of Work 2.1 Introduction Agriculture Financial Services Corporation (afsc), As Part Of Its Vulnerability Management Program Is Seeking The Services Of An Information Technology Security Vendor To Carry Out Third-party Assessment Of Afsc It Systems And Infrastructure Using Various Techniques And Services As Specified In 2.3 Of The Scope Of Work To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of The Existing Security Controls And To Provide Input Into The Development Of Security And Risk Management Program At Afsc. A Major High-level Objective Of This Engagement Is To Request The Respondents Independently Validate Identified Risks Discovered Utilizing Vendor’s Standard Penetration Testing Methodologies, Vulnerability Assessments Techniques, And Red Teaming Methodologies. Another Goal Is To Assist Afsc To Identify Critical Security Controls Gaps That Could Significantly Affect The Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Privacy, And Safety Of Afsc, Its Clients And/or Its Staff. 2.2 Background As An Alberta Provincial Crown Corporation, Afsc Provides Farmers, Agribusinesses And Other Small Businesses Loans, Crop Insurance And Farm Income Disaster Assistance. With This Service Portfolio, Afsc Holds In Trust, Vast Amounts Of Small And Medium Scale Enterprise Sme Records And Information That Must Be Protected; Afsc Must Also Comply With Alberta's Freedom Of Information And Protection Of Privacy (foip) Act Which Provides A Framework For How Alberta Public Bodies Must Handle Citizen’s Information. With The Sensitivity And Volume Of Data Involved, A Data Breach Will Have Severe Risk Consequences For Afsc. It Is Thus Paramount That This Supporting Risk Management Activity (continuous Threat Exposure Management, Vulnerability Assessment, Penetration Testing And Red Teaming Exercise) Complements Afsc’s Assurance Functions. The Purpose Of The Engagement Is To: • Find Vulnerabilities In The Publicly Exposed (internet Accessible) Elements Of The Afsc Infrastructure From A Potential Intruder’s Point Of View. • Determine Whether Technical Vulnerabilities May Be Exploited And The Degree Of Exploitation And Its Impact To Afsc. • Assess The Overall Effectiveness Of Security Controls On The Perimeter Network And External Hosts In A Safe And Controlled Manner With No Unplanned Interruptions To Afsc’s Business Functions. • Explore The Ability For A Company To Help Afsc Build And Mature A Ctem Program The Successful Respondent May Be Required To Provide The Following As Part Of Its Deliverables To Afsc: • Evaluate And Assess Current Afsc Information Security Controls For Mission Critical Applications Within The Organization. • Perform Cloud Assessment And Penetration Testing Services (e.g. Infrastructure, Applications). • Determine The Extent To Which Internal Users May Represent An Exploitable Vulnerability To The Afsc’s Security Through Social Engineering Techniques. • Analyze The Results, Rule Out False Positives, Prioritize The Confirmed Vulnerabilities And Provide Steps For Immediate Remediation. • Provide A Detailed Account Of Findings And A Prioritized List Of Remediation Actions To Be Taken. • Provide Or Assist In Building A Complete Ctem Actionable Security Posture Remediation And Improvement Plan • Perform A Detailed Analysis Of Afsc Network Architecture Evaluating Data Flow, Physical And Logical Connections, Communication Protocols (intranet, Extranet, Remote Vpn), And Identify All Vulnerabilities Not Covered By Current Security Controls. • Conduct An Enterprise Network Discovery And Data Leakage Test To Identify Hosts, Routers, And Subnets That May Be Transmitting Data On Non-approved Or Unauthorized Devices Such As Unauthorized Third-party Connections, Unauthorized Internet Circuits, Or Unauthorized Virtual Private Networks (vpn’s); • Live Fire Type Tuning Of Current Security Tools In Utilization At Afsc 2.3 Objectives The Respondent Shall Provide A Broad Range Of Quality Services To Meet The Requirements Of Afsc In The Following Categories: • Penetration Testing Services – Preferred • Vulnerability Assessment Services – Preferred • Web App Penetration Testing - Preferred • Red Teaming Exercise – Optional; • Additional / Value Add Services – Optional; And • Continuous Threat Exposure Management (ctem) – Optional The Respondent Is Expected To Submit A Proposal For All Preferred Categories And Can Choose To Submit For The Optional Categories As Well. 2.3.1 Penetration Testing Services Penetration Tests Are Important Part Of A Security Team’s Threat And Vulnerability Management Capability. Penetration Tests Are Used As An Independent Verification Mechanism To Assess Organizations’ It Environment Controls. This Type Of Test Will Be Utilized To Determine The Organization’s Overall Security Posture. The Respondent Shall Provide The Following Quality Penetration Testing Services As Further Described Below: • Network Penetration Testing Services; • Web Application Penetration Testing Services; • Web Application Testing Services; And • Social Engineering Testing Services. 2.3.1.1 Network Penetration Testing Services A Network Penetration Testing Of The Computing Infrastructure Of Afsc. This Test Will Be Designed To Determine What Vulnerabilities Exist From Within/outside Afsc Network. The Objective Is To Perform A Controlled Attack Against Findings To Verify Results, And Provide An Overall Risk Assessment To Assist Afsc In Securing Network Infrastructure. The Respondent Shall Provide Network Penetration Testing Services Including But Not Limited To The Details Provided In Section 2.5. 2.3.1.2 Application Penetration Testing Services Application Penetration Testing Provides An Independent Verification Of The Security Status Of Afsc’s Applications. This Test Determines Whether Applications Present And Exploitable Risk To The Organization. The Respondent Shall Provide Application Penetration Testing Services Including But Not Limited To The Details Provided In Section 2.5. 2.3.1.3 Social Engineering Testing Services Social Engineering Testing Is The Use Of Deception And Manipulation To Obtain Confidential Information. It Is A Non-technical Kind Of Intrusion That Relies Heavily On Human Interaction And Often Involves Tricking People Into Breaking Normal Security Procedure. The Respondent Shall Provide Human Centric Social Engineering Testing Services Including But Not Limited To The Following: • Pretexting; • Phishing Campaigns (e.g., Email, Phone); • Brute Force (on Designated Systems); • Password Cracking. 2.3.2 Vulnerability Assessment Services A Vulnerability Assessment Exercise Will Identify What Vulnerabilities Exist Within The Afsc Network And Will Also Provide Recommendation On Prioritization And Remediation Based On The Resultant Risks To Afsc. This Will Also Complement The Findings Of The Afsc Vulnerability Management Program. The Respondent Shall Provide Vulnerability Assessment Services Which Will Include; • Identification Of Vulnerabilities On The Afsc Network; • Analysis Of Such Identified Vulnerabilities And Removing False Positives; • Prioritization Of The Identified Vulnerabilities; • Contextualization Of Risks That Might Arise Due To A Successful Exploit Of The Vulnerability; • Recommendations For Remediation Of The Vulnerability. 2.3.3 Web Application Penetration Testing Services Web Application Penetration Testing Provides An Independent Verification Of The Security Status Of Afsc’s Web Applications. This Test Determines Whether Web Applications Present And Exploitable Risk To The Organization. The Respondent Shall Provide Web Application Penetration Testing Services Including But Not Limited To The Details Provided In Section 2.5. 2.3.4 Red Teaming Exercise Red Teaming Exercise Is Used To Validate The Efficacy Of Security Controls And Capabilities, Or As Part Of Ongoing Incident Response And Threat & Vulnerability Management. The Respondent Will Conduct A Red Teaming Exercise To Obtain A Realistic Level Of Risk And Vulnerabilities Against: • Technology – Systems, Networks And Applications Devices And Appliances; • People – Staff, Outsourced Vendor Personnel, Departments And Business Partners; • Processes; • Incident Response Handling(or Testing); And • Physical Facilities – Offices And Data Centre. 2.3.5 Additional Services The Respondent Should Provide Any Additional / Out Of The Band Services To Afsc. Additional Services May Include, But Not Limited To The Following: • Remediation Assessments Following To The Initial Penetration Tests: • Physical Security Controls Review: • Internet And Email Security Controls Review: • Security Architecture Review: • Security Awareness Exercise Review: 2.3.6 Security Policy Review. Continuous Threat Exposure Management (ctem) A Ctem Program Uses Tools To Inventory And Categorize Assets And Vulnerabilities, Simulate Or Test Attack Scenarios And Other Forms Of Posture Assessment Processes And Technologies. It Is Important That A Ctem Program Has An Effective And Actionable Path. A Continuous Threat Exposure Management (ctem) Program Is A Set Of Processes And Capabilities That Allow Enterprises To Evaluate The Accessibility, Exposure, And Exploitability Of An Enterprise’s Digital And Physical Assets Continually And Consistently. The Respondent Shall Provide Ctem Cycle That Must Include: • Scoping • Discovery • Prioritization • Validation • Mobilization 2.4 Duration May 2024 Would Be The Anticipated Start Date Of Contract, Activities To Follow After That. The Resulting Initial Contract Shall Be For A Period Of One (1) Year With An Option For Extension Subject To Negotiations Satisfactory To Both Parties The Successful Vendor(s) Will Be Afsc’s Preferred Vendor(s) On A Need-to-need Basis During The Term Of The Contract Or Until Such Time As Afsc’s Business Needs Change. If Cloud Services Are Involved, Then Durations May Change. Expansion Capabilities – In The Future, Afsc May Wish To Expand Services Into Other Areas Of Its Business. In This Regard, Afsc Reserves The Right To Engage The Successful Vendor In The Future For Integrated Expansion Capabilities/modules For Other Asfc Business Areas. 2.5 Requirements Afsc Requests Respondents To Execute A Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment, Penetration Testing Services, And Red Teaming Exercise For Afsc’s Systems And Applications. Respondents Are Required To Provide Supporting Information To Show How Vendor Will Execute Based On The Above Exercises And/or Services. 2.5.1 Preferred Requirements Network Penetration Testing Please Indicate Which Of The Following Network-related Environments You Can Perform Penetration Testing On. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each. Network Penetration Testing Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach/methodology Internal And External Penetration Testing Perimeter And Publicly Facing Infrastructure Telephony Systems/voip Cloud Assessment And Penetration Testing Printers, Hvac, Cctv Systems Network Penetration Testing Supporting Information Please Indicate If And How You Can Perform And Meet The Following Network-related Testing Requirements. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each. Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach Or Methodology Denial Of Service Testing Out Of Band Attacks War Dialing Wireless, Wep/wpa Cracking Spoofing Malware Attacks Service Discovery/port Scanning Web & Non-web Application Penetration Testing Please Indicate Which Of The Following Application (web And Non-web)-related Environments And (or) Vectors You Can Perform Penetration Testing On. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each. Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach Or Methodology Web Applications (i.e. Apis, Java, Xml, Asp.net, Php) Custom Apps (i.e. Crm Systems, Sap, Hr Systems ) Databases (i.e. Sql, Mysql, Oracle) 3rd Party Hosted Applications Mobile Applications Web & Non-web Application Penetration Testing Supporting Information Please Indicate If And How You Can Perform And Meet The Following Application (web And Non-web) -related Testing Requirements. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each. Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach Or Methodology Code Review: Analyzing Application Source Code For Sensitive Information Of Vulnerabilities In The Code. Authorization Testing: Testing Systems Responsible For User Session Management To See If Unauthorized Access Can Be Permitted. This Includes: • Input Validation Of Login Fields: Inputting Of Bad Or Overlong Characters And Inputs With The Aim Of Generating Irregular Results. • Cookie Security: Theft Of Cookies By Unauthorized Person. • Lockout Testing: Validating Lockout Processes Such As Timeout And Intrusion Controls To Ensure Legitimate Sessions Cannot Be Compromised Functionality Testing: Performing Testing Of The Application Functionality Itself. This Includes: • Input Validation: Inputting Of Bad Or Overlong Characters, Urls, Or Other Inputs With The Aim Of Generating Irregular Results. • Transaction Testing: Ensuring Desired Application Performance And Run With No Ability To Be Abused By End Users. Website Penetration Testing: Active Analysis Of Web Application Weaknesses Or Vulnerabilities. Encryption Usage Testing: Testing Applications’ Use Of Encryption To Ensure Secure Standards And Management Are Being Used. Authentication Process Testing: Ensuring Strong Authentication Processes Are In Place For End Users. User Session Integrity Testing: Ensuring User Sessions’ Ability To Remain Uncompromised Social Engineering Testing Please Indicate Which Of The Following Vectors You Can Perform Some Level Of Penetration Testing On. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each Vector. Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach Or Methodology Email / Phishing Phone / Vishing Physical Building Access Social Engineering Testing Supporting Information Please Indicate Which Of The Following Methods Of Social Engineering Or Tendencies You Can Support. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each. Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach Or Methodology Phishing Attacks Social Networking Scams – Facebook, Linkedin Pretexting Watering Hole Attacks Tailgating Bypassing Other Physical Security Measures Impersonation – Employee Or External Authority Password Cracking Others – Please Indicate Vulnerability Analysis And Exploitation Please Indicate If And How You Can Perform And Meet The Following Vulnerability Analysis And Exploitation Requirements: Requirements Comments: Please State Your Justification For How Requirements Are Met Please Indicate Any Exploitation Techniques That Will Be Used To Validate Identified Vulnerabilities. Please Indicate What Tools Are Used To Exploit Vulnerabilities And Whether They Are Open Source, Commercial, Or Proprietary Please Indicate How You Will Perform Traversal Of Systems And Hosts Please Indicate Which Of The Following Methods Are Used: • Credential Compromise • Cross Site Scripting • Any Other Method Used 2.5.2 Optional Requirements Red Teaming Exercise Please Indicate If And How You Can Perform And Meet The Following Red Team Exercise Requirements. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each. Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach Or Methodology Please Provide Information About The Methodology That Will Be Used In Conducting Red Team Exercise Of The Afsc Environment. Which Of The Following Areas Are Included In The Assessment. • Digital Assets • Physical Assets • Technical And Operational Processes What Exploitation Tactics Are Used For This Exercise? Does These Include • The Network Services • Physical Layer • Application Layer Are There Particular Cyberattack Emulations Or Threat Actor Roles (such As Organized Crime, Cyberterrorist, Hacktivist, Cyberspy) That Will Be Used During This Exercise? If Yes, Please Provide Additional Information On The Emulations Used. How Does The Team Ensure Foothold And Maintain Presence During The Exercise To Achieve The Set Objectives Continuous Threat Exposure Management Please Indicate Which Of The Following Network-related Environments You Can Perform Ctem Plan On. Please Provide Short Descriptions Of Your Approach Or Methodology For Each. Ctem Requirements Response (yes / No) Approach/methodology Scoping Discovery Prioritization Validation Mobilization 2.5.3 Training If There Is A Need For A Device Install Or Configuration Changes Needed, Documentation And Training To Be Provide To Afsc Staff In Order To Assist With Timely Install And Configuration For What Is Needed. Vendor To Provide Any Needed Training For Documentation To Afsc In Order To Facilitate Any Vulnerability Assessment Activities. 2.6 Corporate Capabilities And Executive Summary Proposals Must Include An Executive Summary Of The Key Features Of The Proposal. This Summary Should Include: A) A Brief Introduction Of The Vendor; B) A Brief Company History And Overview Of The Vendor As It Applies To The Content Of The Competitive Bid; C) Demonstrate A Sound Understanding Of The Scope, Objectives And Requirements Presented In This Competitive Bid; D) The Number And Nature Of Engagements In Similar Scope And Size As Outlined In Section 2.0 Of Competitive Bid During The Past Two (2) Years; And E) Industry Awards, Certifications And Other Market Place Distinctions; F) Social Responsibilities And Environmental Consideration; G) Indicate Why The Vendor Considers Itself To Be A “right” Service Provider And What Key Strengths It Will Bring To Afsc In The Immediate And Long Term. 2.7 Resources Please Provide A List Of The Staff Members That Will Be Assigned To The Engagement At Afsc. Please Note, The Successful Respondent Will Be Required To Sign Off On All Of Afsc’s Security Forms Prior To Any Work Being Completed. The Response Should Include But Not Limited To The Following: Requirements Comments: Please State Your Justification For How Requirements Are Met Provide Information Pertaining To Previous Projects/engagements Of Similar Nature That The Resource Or Team Lead Has Had And Provide References For The Project Provide Resumes For Staff That Will Be Assigned To The Engagement At Afsc. The Resume Should Include Skills, Experience, Qualification, Certifications And Accreditation. If Any Of The Assigned Staff Possess Or Requires Government Security Clearances. Respondent Should Also Identify The Tasks And The Task Dependencies Involved In The Completion Of The Requested Services. Provide Evidence Of License To Conduct Pentest In Location. 2.8 Value Add The Vendor May Describe Two (2) Significant Value Added Services Provided Relative To The Scope Of Work Provided To Other Clients Including The Vendor’s Commitment For Future Support. The Proposal Should Contain A Description Of Value Added Services Provided By The Vendor And The Strategy That The Vendor Would Employ In Proposing A Similar Type Of Service To Afsc. The Proposal Must Clearly Outline If There Are Any Additional Cost For The Value Added Services. 2.9 Approach Proposal Should Include The Following: A) A Description Of Corporate Philosophies, Values, Culture And Approaches Especially As They Relate To The Requirements Of Afsc; B) A Description Of The Vendor’s Decision Making Approach And Philosophy; And; C) The Proposal Must Provide Two Project Examples To Demonstrate The Vendor’s Ability To Take Ownership, Accept Accountability And Deliver On Commitments Made And To “stand Behind Their Work”. D) How The Vendor Plans To Proactively Address Issues That May Come Up In Regards To A Relationship With Afsc. E) Provide The Vendor’s Approach To Quality Assurance, Continuous Improvement, And Performance Management Processes, Techniques, Change Control And Tools. Vendor(s) Proposing An Alternative To A Competitive Bid Requirement Must Clearly Denote Each As An Alternative And Substantiate The Merit Of That Alternative. Proposed Alternatives Must Substantially Meet The Fundamental Intent Of The Requirement. 2.10 Security Please Complete Appendix D Information Security Privacy Cloud Assessment Form And Include It With Your Proposal. This Form Must Be Completed And Submitted Prior To The Closing Date In Order To Proceed To The Next Review Phase. 2.10.1 Data Classification For Awareness, The Type Of Data Involved In This Project Are ( Not Limited To Restricted/protected C. This Can Be Reviewed On The Goa Site. Do You Provide The Ability To Apply Different Data Or Information Classification Levels To Your Data Sets, And Are Different Levels Of Controls Available For Them Based On The Classification? If So Please Provide Detail For Different Processes Such As Security, Privacy Or Retention. 2.11 Technology Information Afsc’s Central Office Is Situated In Lacombe, Alberta Canada. With 2 Geographically Separated Data Centers Located In Edmonton Ab And Lacombe Ab, Afsc’s Enterprise Network Also Consists Of Branch Office Lans Dispersed Across Alberta, Canada. The Afsc Branch Office Lans Are Connected Via Vpn Tunnels Implemented In A Hub-and-spoke Architecture. These Vpns Run In Private Leased Mpls Clouds And Terminate On Head-ends Situated At Each Of The Data Centers Earlier Described. At A Very Simplified Level, Afsc Has About 38 Offices Across Alberta, With Social Media And Cloud Presence; It Also Has Just Under 700 Staff Providing Client, Administration And Technical Support. 2.12 Documentation Please Describe Your Final Penetration Results Report Structure; Requirements Response (yes/ No) Comments: Please State Your Justification For How Requirements Are Met Are These Components Included In The Final Report? • Introduction • Executive Summary • Technical Review • Detailed Findings • Testing Methodology • Screen Shots • Validation Of Compromise Will The Report Contain The Methodology Used Please Describe How You Prioritize Any Identified Vulnerabilities Or Security Weaknesses Do You Provide Recommendations For Remediation? Please Describe Please Provide A Sample Report For Each Of The Test Services Conducted (i.e. Penetration Testing, Etc.) 2.13 Additional Information Additional Requirements Comments: Please State Your Justification For How Requirements Are Met Description Of At Least Three (3) Engagements For Vulnerability Assessment, Penetration Testing / Red Teaming Exercise The Respondent Company Has Conducted Including A Statement Regarding The Type Of It Infrastructure And The Results For Each. A Detailed Recommended Approach Associated With An Assessment Of This Nature For The Scope Of Work Outlined Above. Project Plan That Contains The Elements Relative To The Vulnerability Assessment, Penetration Test And Red Teaming Exercise Conducted From A Location External To Afsc. What Activities Would Be Performed And How Those Activities Would Be Controlled So That Afsc Operations Are Not Interrupted. A Detailed Timeline Required To Complete Scope And Provide Deliverables As Outlined. Preferably In Electronic/paper Form That Contains A Project Plan With The Entire High Level Work Breakdown List. A Brief Description Of Each Project (vulnerability Assessment, Penetration Testing & Red Teaming Exercise) Plan Phase And Milestones And Also The Estimated Timelines For Each Phase And Milestone. The Methodology That Will Be Followed For Implementation Of Your Plan From Within Afsc And Outside Of Afsc (remote Location) Processing Environment. Include Any Unique Requirements Or Conditions. Description Of How The Respondent Company Stays Abreast With The Changing Governmental Regulations And Industry Guidelines For Cyber Security. In Protection Of The Afsc Confidential Information, The Respondent Company Is Expected To Describe How It; • Protects The Information Gathered During The Engagement From Both Internal And External Sources. • Stores Data Collected During Engagement. • Disposes Of Data Collected During Engagement. Please List And Describe All The Tools You Use For An Engagement Like This And Include If They Are Commercially Or In-house Developed. 2.14 Disclosure In The Interest Of Full Disclosure To All Vendors Wishing To Submit A Proposal, Please Note That Afsc Has Had A Previous Working Relationship With A Vendor Who May Submit A Proposal To This Competitive Bid.  In This Regard, Through The Normal Course Of Providing Prior Services To Afsc, It Is Likely That This Vendor Will Have Acquired Knowledge About Afsc, In Addition To Having Had Access To Information, Beyond What Has Been Included Within This Competitive Bid. The Nature Of The Services Provided By The Vendor To Afsc Includes Services That Are Similar, Or Identical, To The Services Described In The Statement Of Work. 2.15 Pricing Please Indicate That The Price Quoted Will Be Guaranteed Until Implementation. Afsc Is Requesting A Fixed Price Response For The Scope Of Work As Outlined In The Section Above In Canadian Dollars. Identify Any Other Administrative Fees Or Services Charges, And Indicate How You Will Be Invoicing In Detail. Please Provide Pricing For One Year Period. Vendors Must Also Identify Any Other Administrative Fees Or Service Charges, And Provide Details On Invoicing (which May Subject To Change Based On Afsc’s Requirements). Services / Solution Pricing Penetration Test (internal Pentest And External Pentest) 3rd Party Hosted Web Application. Price Should Be Provided For Four (4) Of Such Applications Annually Red Teaming Exercise Vulnerability Assessment G. S. T. Certification Clause This Is To Certify That The Services Ordered Or Purchased Are For The Use Of, And Are Being Purchased By Afsc With Crown Funds, And Are Therefore Not Subject To The Goods And Services And Harmonized Sales Tax. 3.0 Evaluation Evaluation Criteria The Competitive Bid Evaluation Criteria Will Be Distributed Within The Following Rating Categories. Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Category Weighting % Requirements • Network Penetration Testing • Web & Non-web Application Penetration Testing • Social Engineering Testing • Vulnerability Analysis And Exploitation • Red Teaming Exercise • Continuous Threat Exposure Management For This Criteria The Evaluation Committee Will Give Particular Reference To The Vendor’s Response To Section 2.5 25% Corporate Capability & Executive Summary • Demonstrate A Sound Understanding Of The Scope • Indicate Why The Vendor Considers Itself To Be A “right” Service Provider And What Key Strengths It Will Bring To Afsc In The Immediate And Long Term. For This Criteria The Evaluation Committee Will Give Particular Reference To The Vendor’s Response To Section 2.6 5% Resource Qualifications • Previous Projects/engagements Of Similar Nature That The Resource Or Team Lead Has Had • Skills, Experience, Qualification, Certifications And Accreditation. • Identify The Tasks And The Task Dependencies Involved In The Completion Of The Requested Services. • Evidence Of License To Conduct Pentest In Location. For This Criteria The Evaluation Committee Will Give Particular Reference To The Vendor’s Response To Section 2.7 20% Value Add • The Vendor May Describe Two (2) Significant Value Added Services Provided Relative To The Scope Of Work Provided To Other Clients Including The Vendor’s Commitment For Future Support. • The Proposal Should Contain A Description Of Value Added Services Provided By The Vendor And The Strategy That The Vendor Would Employ In Proposing A Similar Type Of Service To Afsc. The Proposal Must Clearly Outline If There Are Any Additional Cost For The Value Added Services. For This Criteria The Evaluation Committee Will Give Particular Reference To The Vendor’s Response To Section 2.8 10% Approach For This Criterion The Evaluation Committee Will Give Particular Reference To The Vendor’s Response To Section 2.9 5% Documentation For This Criterion The Evaluation Committee Will Give Particular Reference To The Vendor’s Response To Section 2.12 10% Additional Requirements For This Criterion The Evaluation Committee Will Give Particular Reference To The Vendor’s Response To Section 2.13 5% Pricing (can Be Removed And Scored Independently) 20% Each Evaluation Category And/or Sub-category Is Given A Weight As A Percentage To Reflect Its Relative Importance In The Evaluation. The Members Of The Evaluation Committee Consist Of Afsc Staff From The Product Lines Or A Part Of The Specified Project/area/department Requesting The Services. Proposals Will Be Evaluated And Scored Based On Quality Of Response To The Requirements Of This Rfp. Those Proposals That Score The Highest May Be Shortlisted To Participate In A Subsequent Interview/presentation/demo Process. The Written Portion Will Be Weighted At _60_% And The Interview/demo At _40_%. The Scores From The Proposals May Be Adjusted As Per The Clarifications Presented In The Interview. Selection Of The Preferred Vendor Will Be Based On The Highest Score. (if Applicable) Contract Negotiations May Be Completed Prior To Award And May Be Used As Part Of The Award Decision. Pre-screening Proposals May Be Subject To Pre-screening Based On Select Mandatory Criteria. (if Applicable)   4.0 Contract Review All Agreements Must Be Drafted (or Reviewed And Agreed To) By Afsc’s Legal Department. Previously Entered Into Agreements Between Afsc And The Successful Vendor Will Not Be Used As The Form Of Definitive Agreement For This Engagement. The Definitive Agreement That Is Entered Into Between The Vendor And Afsc Will Incorporate Afsc’s Terms Of Business Set Out At Appendix (b), As Well As Key Afsc Standards For Contracts, Which Are As Follows: • Termination For Convenience Upon Written Notice. • No Limitations Of Liability Or Monetary Caps Granted. • No Disclaimers Of Liability Granted. • No Indemnities Against Third Party Claims Granted (limited Exceptions). • Governing Law - Province Of Alberta, Country Of Canada. • Finite Term Of Contract - No Auto-renewals. If The Vendor Wishes To Propose Alternative Wording To The Terms Of Business Set Out At Appendix (b) Or Disagrees With The Above-listed Key Afsc Standards For Contracts, The Vendor Must Complete And Submit Appendix (c) (alternate Wording – Additional Clause Template) Clearly Citing The Suggested Variations. ***note That Afsc Has The Sole Discretion To Consider Whether Wording Changes Or Alternate Clauses Will Be Considered For Negotiation Purposes And/or Incorporated Into The Definitive Agreement. The Extent And Materiality Of Any Requested Changes/deviations From The Terms Of Business Or Key Afsc Standards For Contracts By The Vendor May Impact The Vendor’s Overall Rating When The Proposal Is Evaluated. By Submitting A Proposal Without A Completed Appendix (c) Attached Thereto, Vendors Are Deemed To Accept The Terms Of Business As Set Out At Appendix (b), As Well As The Above-listed Key Afsc Standards For Contracts As A Condition Of Submitting A Proposal. A Vendor’s Acceptance Of The Terms Of Business And Key Afsc Standards For Contracts May Have A Positive Bearing On The Vendor’s Overall Score. As Part Of The Vendor’s Proposal, Afsc Requires The Vendor To Submit The Vendor’s Typical Form Of Agreement Generally Used With Customers. ***afsc May Or May Not Choose To Use The Vendor’s Typical Form Of Agreement As The Basis Of The Definitive Agreement Between Afsc And The Vendor. Even If Afsc Opts To Use The Vendor’s Typical Form Of Agreement As A Foundation For The Definitive Agreement, As Stated Above, The Final Version Of The Definitive Agreement Will Incorporate Afsc’s Terms Of Business Set Out At Appendix (b), As Well As Key Afsc Standards For Contracts. ***note That Afsc Has The Discretion To Amend The Wording Of The Terms Of Business As Set Out At Appendix (b) When Incorporating Into The Definitive Agreement And, To The Extent That There Is Any Inconsistency Between The Terms Of Business And The Definitive Agreement, The Definitive Agreement Shall Take Precedence. No Work Will Commence In Relation To This Competitive Bid Until A Fully Executed Definitive Agreement Is In Place Between Afsc And The Vendor. Failure To Comply With This Requirement Will Result In Non-payment Of Any Activities Performed Prior To The Execution Of The Definitive Agreement. 4.1 Negotiations Afsc May Require Selected Vendor(s) To Participate In Negotiations And To Submit Revisions To Pricing, Technical Information, Agreements And Any Other Items In Any Proposal That May Result From Negotiations. If Negotiations Do Not Result In Modification Of The Agreement(s) That Is Acceptable To Afsc, The Proposal May Be Rejected. 5.0 Master Schedule The Master Schedule Of Competitive Bid Related Events Is Set Out In The Table Below And Is Governed By The Following Principles: A) In The Event That Any Dates Elsewhere In This Competitive Bid Conflict With A Date Set Out In This Table, The Date Set Out In This Table Shall Prevail; B) All Times Listed Are Based On Mountain Standard Time (mst); C) Afsc Reserves The Right To Adjust The Dates Of The Schedule If Required Through An Addendum Process. # Event Scheduled Date/time 1 Afsc To Accept E-mail Inquiries Relevant To This Competitive Bid. Vendor(s) Must Use The Q & A Template Provided As Appendix (a) And Submit Through Rfp@afsc.ca. March 12, 2024 2 Final Receipt Of Proposals. (closing Date) March 26, 2024 @ 1:00 Pm 3 Evaluation Of Competitive Bid Written Proposals. Afsc In Its Discretion May Extend This Time. March 27, 2024 To April 4, 2024 4 Interviews Or Presentations For Short-listed Vendors. Afsc In Its Discretion May Change This Date. Week Of April 15, 2024 5 Afsc To Perform Reference Checks On Shortlisted Vendors. Afsc In Its Discretion May Change This Date. Week Of April 15, 2024 6 Final Evaluation And Notification Of Award Of Contract. Afsc In Its Discretion May Change This Date. Week Of April 22, 2024 7 Target Commencement Date Afsc In Its Discretion May Change This Date. May 15, 2024 6.0 Proposal Submission Guidelines 6.1 Proposal Format To Facilitate Ease Of Evaluation By The Evaluation Team, And To Ensure Each Proposal Receives Full Consideration, Proposals Should Be Organized In The Following Format Using The Section Titles And Sequence Listed Below: Table Of Contents; A) Pre-screening Requirements (optional) B) Proposal To Statement Of Work (2.0); Including Legal And Contact Information: • The Full Legal Name Of The Vendor. • The Location Of The Vendor’s Head Office And Service Centers. • A Vendor Contact For All Questions And Clarifications Arising From The Proposal. • Vendor Contact Authorized To Participate In Contract Finalizations. References • The Proposal Should Include Three (3) References Including, But Not Limited To Organization, Address, Contact Name, Telephone Number And Email Address. • References Should Include Organizations That Can Verify The Satisfactory Provision, Performance And Or/servicing Of Goods And Associated Services The Name As, Or Similar To The Requirements Of This Competitive Bids, The Corporate Purchasing Section May Contact References In Addition To Those Provided In The Proposal. • References May Be Conducted To Validate Information Provided In The Vendor’s Proposal • It Is Expected That The Vendor(s) Will Be Able To Arrange For Afsc To Contact The Reference During The Evaluation Period. • Government And Agencies, References Would Be Preferred If Available. (optional) Additional Information • Additional Information May Be Included At The Vendor’s Discretion, But This Must Not Detract From The Ability Of Afsc To Easily Reference Information For Evaluation Purposes. Assumptions • Vendor Is Expected To Identify In Detail Any Assumptions That Have Been Made During The Creation Of Their Written Proposal To The Scope Identified. C) Alternate Wording Template (appendix C) D) Vendor’s Agreement Template E) Proof Of Wcb And Insurance F) Proof Of Corporate Registry G) Financial Requirements (optional) H) Vendor’s Ethics Policy (optional) The Vendor Should Have An Ethics Policy That Guides Their Organization In All Its Business Activities And Should Provide A Copy Of This Ethical Policy As An Attachment To Their Proposal. This Policy Will Not Form Part Of The Evaluation. Appendices The Following Appendices Are Included And Applicable To This Competitive Bid: Appendix A: Question And Answer Template Appendix B: Terms Of Business Appendix C: Alternate Wording-additional Clause Template Appendix D: Information Security Privacy Cloud Assessment Form Appendix E: Letter Of Submission Revised 2023 Responsive Proposals Should Provide Straightforward, Concise Information That Satisfies The Requirements Noted In The Proposal Guidelines Section Of This Rfp. Emphasis Should Be Placed On Conformity To Afsc’s Instructions, Requirements Of This Rfp, And Completeness And Clarity Of Content. Ambiguous, Repetitive, Unclear Or Unreadable Proposals May Be Cause For Rejection. 6.2 Proposal Submissions Vendors Must Provide An Electronic Version Of Their Proposal By E-mail To Rfp@afsc.ca Prior To The Closing Date And Time Of This Competitive Bid. (optional) Buyer May Request That A Hard Copy Is Submitted. Electronic Versions (emails) Must Be Less Than 18 Mb In Order For Afsc To Receive The Vendor’s Submission. If The Proposal Is Larger Than 18 Mb, It Must Be Divided Into A Sufficient Number Of Files Such That Each Email, Including Attachments, Is Less Than 18 Mb. Afsc Cannot Accept Files On Media Storage Devices. (optional) All Hard Copy Proposal Materials Are To Be Sealed In A Single Package And Clearly Labelled With The Competitive Bid # To: Attention: Buyer, Business Services Afsc 5718 – 56th Avenue Lacombe, Ab T4l 1b1 In Responding To This Competitive Bid, Your Attention Is Drawn To The Following: • Proposals Received After This Competitive Bid’s Closing Date And Time Will Be Rejected. • Proposals Received Not In The Order Outlined Above In Section 6.1 May Not Be Evaluated Further. Vendors By Submitting A Proposal Are Deemed To Have Accepted The Competitive Bid Terms And Conditions.

Details: Description Republic Of The Philippines City Of San Pedro Province Of Laguna City Bids And Awards Committee Invitation To Apply For Eligibility And To Bid Pr No. 2024-09-0917 1. The City Government Of San Pedro, Laguna Through The 2024 Budget Approved By The Sangguniang Panlungsod Intends To Apply The Sum Of Php 50,000,000.00 Being The Approved Budget Contract (abc) To Payments Under The Contract For Establishment Of Cdrrm Building - Operations Center Phase Ii. Bids Received In Excess Of The Abc Shall Be Automatically Rejected At Bid Opening. 2. The City Government Of San Pedro, Laguna Now Invites Bids For The Following: Quantity Unit Item Description Establishment Of Cdrrm Building - Operations Center Phase Ii 2 Sets Power Over Ethernet Network Switch • Interface: - 24 X 10/100/1000 Base-t Ports - 4 X 1g/10g Sfp+ Ports Poe Standards: Ieee 802.3af And 802.3at •packet Forwarding Rate: 96 Mpps •switching Capacity: 128 Gbps •mac Address Table Size: 32,000 •cpu: Dual Cores, With The Clock Speed Of 1.2 Ghz •flash Memory: 512 Mb Sdram: 1 Gb 18 Sets Omni Directional Acces Point •wireless Protocol: - 802.11ax •throughput: - 1775mbps •certifications: - Ce - Rohs 1 Set 42u Data Cabinet 1 Set 4u Data Cabinet 10 Sets Flood Monitoring Camera • Image Sensor: 1/1.8" Cmos • Pixel: 8 Mp • Max. Resolution: 3840 (h) × 2160 (v) • Rom: 4 Gb • Ram: 1 Gb • Electronic Shutter Speed: 1/1 S–1/300,000 S • Scanning System: Progressive · Min. Illumination: Color: 0.005 Lux@f1.4; B/w: 0.0005 Lux@f1.4 • 0 Lux (ir On) Illumination Distance 250 M (820.21 Ft) (ir) • Illuminator On/off Control: Zoom Prio; Manual; Off • Illuminator Number: 10 (ir) • Wiper: Smart Wiper • Focal Length: 5.5 Mm–220 Mm • Max. Aperture: F1.4–f4.5 • Field Of View: H: 63.9°–2.0°; V: 37.3°–1.1°; D: 71.2°–2.3° • Optical Zoom: 40× • Focus Control: Auto; Semi-auto; Manual • Close Focus Distance: 1.5 M–8 M (4.92 Ft–26.25 Ft) • Iris Control: Auto Pan/tilt Range Pan: 0° To 360° Endless; • Hydrological Monitoring: Recognizes Standard And Virtual Water Level Markers. Triggers An Alarm When The Water Level Exceeds Any Of The Limits. It Also Detects Floating Debris And Boats And Sends Push Notifications With Data On The Water Level. • Video Compression: H.265; Smart H.265+; Smart H.264+; H.264; Mjpeg • Streaming Capability: 3 Streams • Video Frame Rate: Mainstream: 4k/4m/3m/1080p/1.3m/720p (1–25/30fps); Sub Stream 1: D1/cif (1–25/30 Fps); Sub Stream 2: 1080p/1.3m/720p/cif (1–25/30 Fps) • Bit Rate Control: Cbr; Vbr • Support Blc, Hlc, Wdr, Motion Detection, Region Of Interest • Digital Zoom 16x • Audio Compression G.711a; G.711mu; G726; Mpeg2-layer2; G722.1; G729; G723; Pcm • Alarm I/o: 7/2 • Power Supply: 36 Vdc, 2.23 A (± 25%); Hi-poe • Operating Temperature: –40 °c To +70 °c (–40 °f To +158 °f) Protection: Ip67; Tvs 8000 V Lightning Proof; Surge Protection; Voltage Transient Protection 10 Sets Pole Mount Bracket(for Flood Monitoring Camera) 10 Sets Facial Recognition Camera • Image Sensor: 1/1.8" Cmos • Max. Resolution: 3840 (h) × 2160 (v) • Rom: 8 Gb • Ram: 4 Gb • Scanning System: Progressive • Electronic Shutter Speed: Auto/manual 1/3 S–1/100,000 S • Min. Illumination: 0.0007 Lux@f1.6 (color, 30 Ire), 0.0004 Lux@f1.6 (b/w, 30 Ire), 0 Lux (illuminator On) • S/n Ratio: >56db • Illumination Distance: Up To 120 M (393.70 Ft) (ir Led) • Illuminator On/off Control: Auto • Illuminator Number: 4 (ir Led) • Angle Adjustment: Pan: 0-360°, Tilt: 0-90°, Rotation: 0-360° • Lens Type: Motorized Vari-focal • Lens Mount: Module • Focal Length: 8 Mm–32 Mm • Max. Aperture: F1.6 • Field Of View: H: 43°–15°; V: 23°–9°; D: 48°–17° • Iris Control: Auto • Iris Control Type: P-iris • Support Perimeter Protection, Face Detection, Face Recognition, People Counting, Heat Map, Anpr, Parking Space Management (manage Outdoor And Planned Parking Lots; Manage Parking Spaces In Multiple Areas; Display The Total Number Of Parking Spaces And Parking Spaces That Are Available) • Ppe Detection: Triggers Alarms When The Detected Object Matches Or Does Not Match All Of The Configured Attributes (workwear, Hat, Facemask, Apron, Gloves, Shoe Covers, Boots, Seatbelt, Safety Vest); Privacy Protection • Video Metadata: Motor Vehicle, Non-motor Vehicle, Face, And Human Body Detection; Snapshot; Snapshot Optimization; Optimal Face Snapshot Upload. • Motor Vehicle Attributes: License Plate, Vehicle Type, Vehicle Color, Vehicle Logo, Seatbelt, Smoking, And Calling. Generates Flow Statistics For People, Motor Vehicles And Non-motor Vehicles Based On The Direction, And Exports Reports. • Non-motor Vehicle Attributes: Type, Vehicle Color, Number Of People, Top Type And Color, And Hat. • Human Body Attributes: Top And Bottom Type And Color, Bag, Hat, Gender And Umbrella. Privacy Protection. • Video Compression: H.265; H.264; H.264h; H.264b; Mjpeg • Smart Codec: Smart H.265+; Smart H.264+ • Video Frame Rate: • Default: Main Stream: 3840 × 2160@(1–25/30 Fps), Sub Stream: 1920 × 1080@(1–25/30 Fps); Third Stream: 1920 × 1080@(1–25/30 Fps); Fourth Stream: 1920 × 1080@(1–25/30 Fps); Fifth Stream: 704 × 576@(1–25 Fps)/704 × 480@(1–30 Fps) • High Frame Rate: Main Stream: 3840 × 2160@(1–50/60 Fps), Sub Stream: 1920 × 1080@(1–25/30 Fps) • Stream Capability: 5 Streams Resolution: 8m (3840 × 2160); 6m (3072 × 2048); 5m (3072 × 1728); 5m (2592 × 1944); 4m (2688 × • 1520); 3m (2048 × 1536); 3m (2304 × 1296) 1080p (1920 × 1080); 1.3m (1280 × 960); 720p (1280 × 720); D1 (704 × 576/704 × 480); Cif (352 × 288/352 × 240) • Support 3d Nr, Blc, Hlc, Wdr (at Least 120db), Smart Illumination, Defog • Cyber Security: Configuration Encryption; Trusted Execution; Digest; Security Logs; Wsse; Account Lockout; Syslog; Video Encryption; 802.1x; Ip/mac Filtering; Https; Trusted Upgrade; Trusted Boot; Firmware Encryption; Generation And Importing Of X.509 Certification • Operating Temperature –40 °c To +65 °c • Protection Ip67; Ik10; • Power Supply 12 Vdc/24 Vac/poe+ (802.3at)/epoe Alarm Input/output: At Least 3 Channels/ At Least 2 Channels 10 Sets Pole Mount Bracket(for Facial Recognition Camera) 13 Sets License Plate Recognition Camera • Image Sensor: 1.1" Gs-cmos • Shutter Mode: Single Shutter; Double Shutters; Three Shutters • Electronic Shutter Speed: Auto/manual 1/50 S–1/100,000 S • Noise Reduction: 3d Nr • S/n Ratio: 48 Db • Wdr: 120 Db • Min. Illumination: 0.001 Lux • Day/night: Icr Auto Switch: Uses Ir Cut-off Filter (ircf) With Polarizer In The Daytime, And Uses Ordinary Filter At Night. • Illuminator Number: 8 • Ir Light: Yes • Illumination Distance: 23 M-30m (75.46 Ft–98.43 Ft) (brightness Adjustable) • Lane Coverage: Center Mount: 4 Lanes; Side Mount: 3 Lanes • Lens Type Motorized: Vari-focal • Focal Length: 16 Mm–40 Mm • Max. Aperture: F1.4 • Iris Type: P-iris • Field Of View: Horizontal: 22.3°–53.0°; Vertical: 13.8°–32.3°; Diagonal: 26.0°–61.9° • Trigger Mode: Video Trigger/radar Trigger • Speed Detection Range: 0 Km/h–300 Km/h • Osd Overlay: Time; Address; Lane No.; Plate; Plate Color; And More Support Target Detection (motor Vehicle; Motorcycle), Face Detection, Anpr, Vehicle Type Recognition(vehicle Head: Suv, Large Bus, Sedan,light Truck, Pickup, Heavy Truck, Medium Truck, Van, Medium Bus, Mpv Vehicle Tail: Suv, Large Bus, Sedan, Light Truck, Pickup, Heavy Truck, Medium Truck, Van) • Accuracy (under Recommended Installation And Lighting Conditions): Capture Rate > 99%; Lpr Accuracy > 98% • Vehicle Color Recognition: White, Pink, Black, Red, Yellow, Gray, Blue, Green, Dark Orange, Purple, Brown, And Silver, Gray (color Recognition Is Not Supported During The Nighttime) • Vehicle Brand/logo Recognition: • Vehicle Head Mode: Acura, Alfa Romeo, Ashok Leyland, Aston Martin, Audi, Baic, Bently, Benz, Bmw, Buick, Byd, Cadillac, Chery, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Citroen, Dacia, Daihatsu, Datsun, Dodge, Ds, Ferrari, Fiat, Force, Ford, Foton, Geely, Gmc, Great Wall, Hino, Honda, Hyundai, Infiniti, Isuzu, Iveco, Jac, Jaguar, Jeep, Kia, King Long, Land, Lexus, Lifan, Lincoln, Mahindra, Man, Maserati, Mazda, Mercury, Mg, Mini, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Opel, Peugeot, Porsche, Renault, Rolls Royce, Saab, Scania, Seat, Skoda, Smart, Subaru, Suzuki, Tata, Tesla, Toyota, Ud, Volkswagen, Volvo • Traffic Flow Detection Generates Statistics On Vehicle Flow, Queue Length, Average Speed, Lane Occupancy, And More Traffic Event Motor Vehicle Illegal Stopping On The Roadway, Traffic Congestion • Video Compression: H.265; H.264m; H.264h; Mjpeg • Video Resolution: 4096 (h) × 2336 (v) • Video Frame Rate: • 50 Hz: Maximum 50 Fps; Default Mainstream (4096 × 2336@25 Fps), Sub Stream (1600 × 1200@25 Fps) • 60 Hz: Maximum 30 Fps; Default Mainstream (4096 × 2336@15 Fps), Sub Stream (1600 × 1200@15 Fps) • Video Bit Rate: H.264: 32 Kbps–32767 Kbps; H.265: 32 Kbps–32767 Kbps; Mjpeg: 512 Kbps–32767 Kbps • Bit Rate Control: Cbr/vbr • Support Blc, Hlc, Edge Enhancement, Bad Pixel Correction • Composite Image: Supports Combining Up To 4 Images Into A Composite Image • Security Authorized Username And Password, Mac Address Binding, Https Encryption, And Network Access Control • Positioning: Gps • Network Status Monitoring: Ntp; Gps • Alarm Input/output: At Least 4 Channels /2 Channels • Operating Temperature: –40 °c To +65 °c (–40 °f To +149 °f) • Power Supply: 100–240 Vac (50 Hz/60 Hz) 13 Sets 3-dimensional Universal Mounting Bracket 34 Sets Bullet Ip Camera • Image Sensor: 1/2.9" Cmos • Max. Resolution: 2688 (h) × 1520 (v) • Rom: 128 Mb • Ram: 128 Mb • Scanning System: Progressive • Electronic Shutter Speed: Auto/manual 1/3 S–1/100,000 S • Min. Illumination: 0.006 Lux@f1.6 (color, 30 Ire), 0.0006 Lux@f1.6 (b/w, 30 Ire), 0 Lux (illuminator On) • S/n Ratio: >56 Db • Illumination Distance: Up To 80 M (262.47 Ft) (ir Led) • Illuminator On/off Control: Auto; Manual • Illuminator Number: 4 (ir Led) • Pan/tilt/rotation Range: Pan: 0°–360°, Tilt: 0°–90°, Rotation: 0°–360° • Lens Type: Fixed-focal • Lens Mount: M12 • Focal Length: 8 Mm; 6 Mm; 3.6 Mm • Max. Aperture: F1.6 • Field Of View: 3.6 Mm: H: 84°; V: 42°; D: 101°; 6 Mm: H: 52°; V: 28°; D: 61°; 8 Mm: H: 40°; V: 23°; D: 46° • Iris Control: Fixed • Close Focus Distance: 3.6 Mm: 1.7 M (5.58 Ft), 6 Mm: 3.2 M (10.50 Ft); 8 Mm: 4.6 M (15.09 Ft) • Support Perimeter Protection (intrusion, Tripwire), Blc. Hlc, Wdr(at Least 120db), Smart Illumination, Mirror, 3d Nr, Region Of Interest( At Least 4 Areas) • Video Compression H.265; H.264; H.264h; H.264b; Mjpeg • Smart Codec Smart H.265+; Smart H.264+ • Video Frame Rate: - Main Stream: 2688 × 1520@ (1–20 Fps)/2560 × 1440@(1–25/30 Fps) - Sub Stream: 704 × 576@ (1–25 Fps)/704 × 480@(1–30fps) - Stream Capability: 2 Streams - Resolution: 4m (2688 × 1520/2560 × 1440); 3m (2304 × 1296); 1080p (1920 × 1080); 1.3m (1280 × 960); 720p (1280 × 720); D1 (704 × - 576/704 × 480); Vga (640 × 480); Cif (352 × 288/352 × 240) • Bit Rate Control: Cbr/vbr • Video Bit Rate: H.264: 32 Kbps–6144 Kbps; H.265: 12 Kbps–6144 Kbps • Interoperability: Onvif • Cyber Security: Configuration Encryption; Trusted Execution; Digest; Security Logs; Wsse; Account Lockout; Syslog; Video Encryption; 802.1x; Ip/mac Filtering; Https; Trusted Upgrade; Trusted Boot; Generation And Importing Of X.509 Certification • Power Supply: 12 Vdc/poe (802.3af) Operating Temperature –40 °c To +60 °c (–40 °f To +140 °f) 34 Sets Junction Box 34 Sets Pole Mount Bracket(for Bullet Ip Camera) 1 Set Ip Based Paging Microphone 13 Sets Strobe Led Illuminator • Light Type: Led • Light Source: Ir (wavelength 730 Nm) • Center Illuminance: ﹤23u W/cm2 (20 M Illumination) • Illumination Distance: 18 M–35 M (59.06 Ft–114.83 Ft) • Frequency: The Integer Multiple Of Camera Refreshing Frequency • Led Quantity: At Least 42 (high-brightness Led) • Luminous Flux: At Least 16 W • Strobe Pulse Width: 0 Ms–3 Ms • Strobe Delay: 0 Ms–4 Ms • Strobe Time: Records Total Strobe Time • Lens Illuminating Angle: At Least 10° × 30° • Day/night: Sensitivity Adjustable (1–6) Operating Mode: Strobe 1 Set 64 Channel Network Video Recorder • With 8 Pcs Sata At Least 16tb Hdd • Main Processor: Industrial-grade Processor • Operating System: Embedded Linux • Operating Interface: Web, Local Gui • Ai By Recorder: Face Detection; Face Recognition; Perimeter Protection; Smd Plus • Ai By Camera: Face Detection; Face Recognition; Video Metadata (human, Motor Vehicles, And Non-motor Vehicles); Perimeter Protection; Smd Plus; Stereo Analysis; Crowd Distribution; People Counting; Anpr; Vehicle Density; Heat Map • Acupick Ai By Camera +recorder: Max. 32-channel, 1 Combined Event Per Channel/s • Perimeter Performance Ai By Recorder (number Of Channels): 4 Channels, 10 Ivs Rules For Each Channel • Face Attributes: Gender; Age Group; Glasses; Expressions; Face Mask; Beard • Face Detection Performance Of Ai By Camera (number Of Channels):16 Channels • Face Database Capacity: Up To 20 Face Databases With 20,000 Images, With A Total Capacity Of 2.5 G. Name, Gender, Birthday, Address, Credential Type, Credential No., Countries & Regions And State Can Be Added To Each Face Image. • Smd Plus By Recorder: 8 Channels • Metadata Performance Of Ai By Camera (number Of Channels): 8 Channels • Human Attributes Top Color, Top Type, Bottom Color, Bottom Type, Hat, Bag, Age, Gender And Umbrella • Access Channel: 64 Channels • Network Bandwidth: Ai Disabled: 384 Mbps Incoming, 384 Mbps Recording And 384 Mbps Outgoing • Resolution: 32 Mp;24 Mp;16 Mp;12 Mp;8 Mp;6 Mp;5 Mp;4 Mp;3 Mp;1080p;720p;960p; D1; Cif; Qcif • Decoding Capability: Ai Disabled: 2-channel 32 Mp@25 Fps; 2-channel 24mp@25 Fps; 4-channel 16 Mp@30 Fps; 5-channel 12 Mp@30 Fps; 8-channel 8 Mp@30 Fps; 10-channel 6 Mp@30 Fps; 12-channel 5 Mp@30 Fps; 16-channel 4 Mp@30 Fps; 32-channel 1080p@30 Fps • Video Output: 2 Vga, 2 Hdmi; Vga:1920 × 1080, 1280 × 1024, 1280 × 720; Hdmi:3840 × 2160, 1920 × 1080, 1280 × 1024, 1280 × 720 • Multi-screen Display: Main Screen: 1/4/8/9/16/25/36/64; Sub Screen: 1/4/8/9/16 • Video Compression: Smart H.265+; H.265; Smart H.264+; H.264; Mjpeg • Audio Compression: G.711a; G.711u; Pcm; G726 • Multi-channel Playback: Up To 16 Channels • Disk Group: Yes • Raid: Raid 0/1/5/6/10 • Alarm Input: 16 Channels • Alarm Output: 8 Channels Disk Interface: 8 Sata Ports, Each Disk Can Contain Up To 20tb. 1 Set 8 Channel Network Video Recorder • With 2 Pcs Sata At Least 16tb Hdd • Main Processor: Industrial-grade Processor • Operating System: Embedded Linux • Operating Interface: Web, Local Gui • Ai By Recorder: Face Detection; Face Recognition; Perimeter Protection; Smd Plus • Ai By Camera: Face Detection; Face Recognition; Video Metadata (human, Motor Vehicles, And Non-motor Vehicles); Perimeter Protection; Smd Plus; Stereo Analysis; Crowd Distribution; People Counting; Anpr; Vehicle Density; Heat Map • Acupick Ai By Camera +recorder: Max. 8-channel, 1 Combined Event Per Channel/s • Perimeter Performance Ai By Recorder (number Of Channels): 4 Channels, 10 Ivs Rules For Each Channel • Face Attributes: Gender; Age Group; Glasses; Expressions; Face Mask; Beard • Face Detection Performance Of Ai By Camera (number Of Channels): 8 Channels • Face Database Capacity: Up To 20 Face Databases With 20,000 Images, With A Total Capacity Of 2.5 G. Name, Gender, Birthday, Address, Credential Type, Credential No., Countries & Regions And State Can Be Added To Each Face Image. • Smd Plus By Recorder: 8 Channels • Metadata Performance Of Ai By Camera (number Of Channels): 8 Channels • Human Attributes Top Color, Top Type, Bottom Color, Bottom Type, Hat, Bag, Age, Gender And Umbrella • Access Channel: 8 Channels • Network Bandwidth: Ai Disabled: 384 Mbps Incoming, 384 Mbps Recording And 384 Mbps Outgoing • Resolution: 32 Mp;24 Mp;16 Mp;12 Mp;8 Mp;6 Mp;5 Mp;4 Mp;3 Mp;1080p;720p;960p; D1;cif;qcif • Decoding Capability: Ai Disabled: 2-channel 32 Mp@25 Fps; 2-channel 24mp@25 Fps; 4-channel 16 Mp@30 Fps; 5-channel 12 Mp@30 Fps; 8-channel 8 Mp@30 Fps • Video Output: 1 Vga, 1 Hdmi; Vga:1920 × 1080, 1280 × 1024, 1280 × 720; Hdmi:3840 × 2160, 1920 × 1080, 1280 × 1024, 1280 × 720 • Multi-screen Display: Main Screen: 1/4/8/9; Sub Screen: 1/4/8/9 • Video Compression: Smart H.265+; H.265; Smart H.264+; H.264; Mjpeg • Audio Compression: G.711a; G.711u; Pcm; G726 • Multi-channel Playback: Up To 8 Channels • Disk Group: Yes • Alarm Input: 4 Channels • Alarm Output: 2 Channels Disk Interface: 2 Sata Ports, Each Disk Can Contain Up To 20tb. 13 Sets Edge Storage Terminal • Ethernet Port: 1*100/1000 Base-x; 1*10/100/1000 Base-t; 8*10/100 Base-t • Operating System: Linux • Operating Interface: Web Client • Network Protocol: Tcp/ip; Http; Https; Sftp; Ftp; Dns; Rtp; Rtsp; Rtc; Ntp; Dhcp; Ieee 802.1x • Image Encoding Format: Jpeg • Main Processor: High-performance Embedded Processor • Memory: 2 Gb • Power Switch: 1 Power Switch • Indicator Light: 1 × On/off Status; 1 × Operation Status; 1 × Alarm Indicator; 1 × Disk Read/write Indicator • Storage Disk; Ftp; Sftp Osd Overlay: Time, Address, Lane Name, Driving Direction, Violation Code, Violation Name, Vehicle Speed, Speeding Ratio, Plate, Plate Color And Type, Vehicle Color And Size, Vehicle Type, Seatbelt Status, Call, Gps Information, Remote Device Gps, Section Information And Code, Section Distance And Speed Limit, Entry And Exit Time, Entry And Exit Lane, And More. • Positioning: Gps; Bds • Composite Image: Supports Combining 1 To 6 Source Images Into A Composite Image By Using Normal And Related Composition Functions. • Vehicle Search: Search By Time, Channel, Plate, Speed, Lane, Target Type, Plate Color, Vehicle Color, And Violation Type Such As Not Wearing Seatbelt And Calling While Driving. Fuzzy Search Is Supported. Export Results In Csv And Excel Format. • Alarm Event: Storage Full, External Alarm, License Plate Blocklist, Illegal Access, And Security Fault Alarm. • Alarm Input/output: At Least 4 Channels/4 Channels • Hdd Interface: 1 × 4 Tb Disk (included); Supports Max. 4 Sata 3.5" Disks. Rs-232:2, Rs-485: 4, Usb: 2 X Usb 3.0 Ports 1 Set 36-bay Embedded Video Storage • With 36 Pcs Sata At Least 16tb Hdd • Main Processor: 64-bit High-performance Multi-core Processor • Operating System: Embedded Linux Os • Operating Interface: Web (pcapp) • Controller: Single Controller • Cache: 8 Gb By Default (extendable To 64 Gb) • Video Compression: Smart H.265+; H.265; Smart H.264+; H.264; Mjpeg • Audio Compression: G.711a; G.711u; Pcm; G726 Storage: Incoming: 320-channel Or Higher (bandwidth: 800 Mbps At Least); Recording: 320-channel Or Higher (bandwidth: 800 Mbps At Least); Outgoing: 320-channel Or Higher (bandwidth: 800 Mbps At Least); Playback: 32-channel Or Higher (bandwidth: 64 Mbps At Least) • Disk Group: Yes • Raid: Raid 0/1/5/6/10/50/60 • Multi-channel Playback: 16-channel At Least • Record Mode: Auto Record; Manual Record; Search Video Detection; Io Alarm; Thermal Imaging; Intelligent Event; All Record File • Hdd Interface: 36 Slots At Least, Sata, Up To 20 T Per Hdd Or Higher, Hot Swapping, Cmr Power: 1+1 Redundant Power 10 Sets 16 Tb Hard Drive 1 Lot Management Software • Should Support Video Surveillance, Emergency Processing, Arming, Video Analysis And More. • Should Include Modules For Vehicle Violations And Road Events. • Should Easily Scale, Upgrade And Add More Functions To It To Meet End User Expanding Needs. • Organizations: 10 Levels; 999 Organizations In Total • Roles (user Permission): 100 • Users: 1500 Online Users And 10,000 Total Users • Roles Per User: 32 • Users For Vdp Mobile App: Standalone Deployment: At Least 1,000; Cluster Deployment: At Least 1,500 • General Recording Plans: At Least 3,000 • Video Retrieval Plans: At Least 3,000 • File Retrieval Plans: At Least 3,000 • Event Rules: At Least 3,000 • Detection Points: At Least 256 • Maximum Anpr Devices Linked To Each Detection Point: At Least 16 • Detection Areas: At Least 100 • Driving Areas: At Least 100 • Maximum Anpr Devices Linked To Each Driving Area: At Least 100 • Traffic Restriction Rules: At Least 100 • Intersections: 200 • Road Sections: At Least 100 • Support Internal Database/independent Database • Event Records: Max. 300 Million • Face Recognition Records: Max. 300 Million • Passing Vehicle Records: Max. 300 Million • Video Metadata Records: Max. 300 Million Resource File Records: Max. 300 Million 1 Set Management Server • Main Processor: At Least Two 8-core Intel Xeon 4309y Processors • Ram: At Least 16gb*4 Ddr4, Up To 1tb, Ecc Memory • Power: 1+1 Redundant Power • Raid Controller: Perc H355 Controller • Network Port: At Least 8 Gigabit Ports • Serial Port: At Least 1 • Vga: At Least 2 • Usb: At Least 1*usb2.0, 2*usb3.0 Ports Quantity Of Hard Drive: Standard: Two 3.5-inch Sata 2tb Enterprise-level Hdds; Two 2.5-inch Sata 480gb Data Center-level Ssds 20 Sets Ip Based Outdoor Horn • Network Protocols: Http, Udp, Arp, Icmp, Igmp, Sip, Onvif • Frequency Response: 100hz – 18khz • Temperature: -40℃～70℃ Intercom Function Support 13 Sets Desktop Workstation • Processor: Intel Core I5-11500 Processor 2.7 Ghz • Memory: 8gb • Storage: 1tb Hdd Sata & 256gb M.2 Nvme Ssd • Monitor: O Display Size: 21.5” O Display Type: Ips Led O Resolution: 1920x1080 Refresh Rate: 75hz 1 Set 10kva Uninterruptible Power Supply • Voltage: 160~280vac / 277 – 485 Vac • Frequency: 45 ~ 65 Hz • Capacity: 9000w • Battery: O Type: Sealed Lead Acid Maintenance Free O Capacity: 12v/9ah • Other Features: O Status On Led And Lcd Self-diagnostics Upon Power On, O 24hour Routine Checking • Product Certifications: O En62040-1-1, Ul1778 O En62040-2, En61000-3-2, En61000-3-3, Fcc Class A Ce, Cul, Ul 1 Set All-in-one Weather Station • Anemometer, Rain Collector, Temperature And Humidity Measurement Sensors • Standard Radiation Shield Weather Console Inclusive 5 Boxes Indoor Cat6 Cable 2 Sets Sfp Transceiver 1 Set 16 Pon Ports Gpon Olt • Ports: O 2*10/100/1000m Auto Negotiation Ethernet Ports O 2 Sfp Interfaces O 16 Pon Ports • Gpon Function: O Itu-tg.984/g.988 Standard O Support Omci Protocol O T-contdba O Gemport Traffic O Onu Auto Discovers O Ranging Function O Downstream Data Encrypted • Layer 2 Switching Function: O Access/trunk/hybrid L2 Access Mode O Support30kmacaddress O Support4094vlans O Vlan Filter Function, Vlan Transform • Layer 3 Switching Function: O Static Routing O Dhcp Server O Arp Proxy • Multicast Function: O Igmp Snooping O Igmp V1/v2/v3 O Multicast Vlan Translation • Management: O Cli/webnet/telnet/ssh/mqtt O Performance Management O Alarm Management O Security Management • Maintenance: O Device Log O Device Upgrade O Fault Diagnose Condition Monitoring 38 Sets 4ge Xpon Onu • User Port: O 4 10/100/1000 Mbps Adaptive Ethernet Port O Full/half Duplex O Auto Mdi/mdi – X • Indicators: Power, Pon, Lan, Los, Poe • Management: O Epon: Oam / Web / Telnet O Gpon: Omci/ Web / Telnet • Multicast: O Igmp V2 O Igmp Vlan O Igmp Transparent/snooping/proxy • Switch: O Mac Address Learning O Broadcast Storm Suppression O Mac Address Learning Account Limit • Security: O Mac Address/url Filter O Remote Web/ Telnet Access Control 55 Sets Sfp 14 Sets Distribution Box 20 Sets 1:8 Foc Splitter 10 Sets Media Converter 18 Sets 55" Video Wall • Display O Screen Type: Lcd / Indoor O Bezel Width: 0.9mm Or Better O Panel Resolution: 1920x1080p Or Higher O Brightness: 700 Cd/m O Dynamic Contrast Ratio: 30,000:1 O Response Time (typical): 8 Ms O Aspect Ratio: 16:9 O Viewing Angle (h / V): 178 / 178 Degree O Pixel Pitch: 0.63 X 0.63 Mm O Contrast Ratio (typical): At Least 1100:1 • Connectivity O Video Input: Display Port1.2, Dvi-d, Hdmi 1.4, Vga (analog D-sub), Usb 2.0 O Audio Input: 3.5 Mm Mini Jack, Audio Left / Right (rca) O Video Output: Dvi-l, Display Port 1.2 O Audio Output: 3.5mm Mini Jack • Operating Conditions O Temperature Range (operation): 0 ~ 40 Operation: 24/7 18 Sets Matrix Controller • Port Type: Hdmi • Resolution: 1920x1080 / 60hz • Ir: 1 Input/ 1 Output • Relay: 2 Relay Control Ports • Lan Port: 1x Rj45, Max Rate 1000mbps • Network Protocol: Ip/tcp Power: Dc12v; Poe Supported 2 Lot Outdoor Led Screens • Grey Scale: 14 Bit • Viewing Angle: H: 160 V:160 • Refresh Rate: 1920hz • Ip Grade: Front Ip65, Back: Ip54 Interface: Wi-fi, Lan, Usb 1 Set Ip Pabx Call Features: Call Park, Call Forward, Call Transfer, Call Waiting, Caller Id, Call Record, Call History, Ringtone, Ivr, Music On Hold, Call Routes, Did, Dod, Dnd, Disa, Ring Group, Ring Simultaneously, Time Schedule, Pin Groups, Call Queue, Pickup Group, Paging/intercom, Voicemail, Call Wakeup, Sca, Blf, Voicemail To Email, Fax To Email, Speed Dial, Call Back, Dial By Name, Emergency Call, Call Follow Me, Blacklist/whitelist, Voice Conference, Video Conference, Event List, Feature Codes, Busy Camp-on/ Call Completion, Voice Control, Post-meeting Reports, Virtual Fax Sending/receiving, Email To Fax • Media Encryption: Srtp, Tls, Https, Ssh, 802.1x • Analog Telephone Ports: 8 Rj11 Ports • Pstn Line Fxo Ports: 8 Rj11 Ports • Network Interfaces: 3 Self-adaptive Gigabit Ports With Poe+ • Led Indicators: Power, Fxs, Fxo, Lan, Wan And Heartbeat • Lcd Display: Equipped • Reset Switch: Equipped • Network Protocols: Sip, Tcp/udp/ip, Rtp/rtcp, Iax, Icmp, Arp, Dns, Ddns, Dhcp, Ntp, Tftp, Ssh, Http/https, Pppoe, Stun, Srtp, Tls, Ldap, Hdlc, Hdlc-eth, Ppp, Frame Relay (pending), Ipv6, Openvpn • Nat Router Supported • Compliance: Fcc: Part 15 (cfr 47) Class B, Part 68 O Ce: En 55032, En 55035, En 61000-3-2, En 61000-3-3, En 62368-1, Etsi Es 203 021, Itu-t K.21 O Ic: Ices-003, Cs-03 Part I Issue 9 O Rcm: As/nzs Cispr 32, As/nzs 62368.1, As/ca S002, As/ca S003.1/.2 Power Adapter: Ul 60950-1 Or Ul 62368-1 21 Sets Ip Telephony • Network Interfaces: Dual Switched Auto-sensing 10/100/1000 Mbps Gigabit Ethernet Ports With Integrated Poe • Telephony Features: Hold, Transfer, Forward, 5-way Conference, Call Park, Call Pickup, Shared-call Appearance (sca)/bridged-line-appearance(bla), Downloadable Phonebook(xml, Ldap, Up To 2000 Items), Call Waiting, Call Log(up To 2000 Records), Xml Customization Of Screen, Off-hook Auto Dial, Auto Answer, Click-to-dial, Flexible Dial Plan, Hot-desking, Personalized Music Ringtones And Music On Hold, Server Redundancy And Fail-over Protocol Standards: Sip Rfc3261, Tcp/ip/udp, Rtp/rtcp, • Http/https, Arp, Icmp, Dns(a Record, Srv, Naptr), Dhcp, Pppoe, Telnet, Tftp, Ntp, Stun, Simple, Lldp, Ldap, Tr-069, 802.1x, Tls, Srtp, Ipv6 • Feature Keys: 8-line Keys With Up To 6 Sip Accounts, 10 Mpk Extension Keys With Paper Slot, 4 Xml Programmable Context Sensitive Softkeys, 5 Navigation/menu Keys, 9 Dedicated Function Keys For: Message (with Led Indicator), Transfer, Headset, Mute, Send/ Redial, Speakerphone, Vol+, Vol+. • Connectivity: Wi-fi Dual Band 2.4ghz | 5ghz & Bluetooth Integrated • Compliance: O Fcc: Part 15 (cfr 47) Class B O Ce: En55022 Class B; En55024 Class B; En61000-3-2; En61000-3-3; En60950-1 Rcm: As/acif S004; As/nzs Cispr22/24; As/nzs 60950.1 2 Sets High End Ip Telephony • Network Interfaces: Dual Switched 10/100/1000 Mbps Ports With Integrated Poe/poe+ • Graphic Display: Capacitive Touchscreen • Camera: Tiltable 1mp With Privacy Shutter • Connectivity: Wi-fi Dual Band 2.4ghz | 5ghz & Bluetooth Integrated • Compliance: O Fcc: Part 15 Class B; Part 15 Subpart C (15.247); Part 15 Subpart E (15.407); Part 68 Hac O Ic: Rss-247; Rss-gen; Rss-102; Iecs-003; Cs03 O Ce: En 55032; En 55035; En 61000-3-2; En 61000-3-3; En 62368-1; En 301 489-1; En 301 489-17; En 300 328; En 301 893; En 62311 Rcm: As/nzs Cispr 32; As/nzs 4268; As/nzs 62368.1; As/ca S004 1 Lot Lora Gateway & Bridge, Air Quality Sensors & Backend System • End Device: Must Be Able To Receive Data From Sensors. • Gateway: Device Must Be Able To Relay Message From Sensor/end Device To Server. 13 Boxes Outdoor Cat6 Cable 1 Lot Foc, Foc Installation Accessories, Loop Support And Copper Accessories 9 Drums 2km 48 Core Fiber Optic Cable 20 Drums 2km 2 Core Fiber Optic Cable 45 Sets Outdoor Cabinet 30 Sets Bullet Extension Camera Bracket 15 Sets 5m Cctv Pole With Installation 40 Sets Circuit Breaker And Outlet For Outdoor Cabinet 1 Lot Project Managment, Osp Services (installation, Commissioning, Termination, And Testing) Delivery Of The Goods/services Is Required Within Sixty (60) Calendar Days Upon Receipt Of The Notice To Proceed. Bidders Should Have Completed, Within Five (5) Years From The Date Of Submission And Receipt Of Bids, A Contract Similar To The Project. The Description Of An Eligible Bidder Is Contained In The Bidding Documents, Particularly, In Section Ii, Instruction To Bidders. 3. Bidding Will Be Conducted Through Open Competitive Bidding Procedures Using A Non-discretionary “pass/fail” Criterion As Specified In The Implementing Rules And Regulations (irr) Of Republic Act (ra) 9184. Otherwise Known As The “government Procurement Reform Act”. In Addition, Bidding Is Restricted To Filipino Citizen/sole Proprietorships, Partnerships, Or Organizations With At Least Sixty Percent (60%) Interest Or Outstanding Capital Stock Belonging To Citizens Of The Philippines, And To Citizens Or Organizations Of A Country The Laws And Regulations Of Which Grant Similar Rights To Privileges To Filipino Citizens, Pursuant To Ra 5183 And Subject To Commonwealth Act 138. 4. Interested Bidders May Obtain Further Information From The City Government Of San Pedro, Laguna And Inspect The Bidding Documents At The Address Given Below During 8:30am To 9:30am Only. Office Of The Bac Secretariat 4/f Conference Room, City Administrator’s Office City Hall Bldg., San Pedro, Laguna A Complete Set Of Bidding Document May Be Purchased By Interested Bidders On The Date, Time And Address Below And Upon Payment Of A Non-refundable Fee For The Bidding Documents In The Amount Of Php 25,000.00. Issuance Of Eligibility And Bidding Documents: September 23 – October 14, 2024 8:30am To 9:30am Bac Secretariat 4/f Conference Room City Administrator’s Office City Hall Bldg., San Pedro, Laguna 5. Bids Must Be Delivered To The Address Below On Or Before The Specified Date And Time. All Bids Must Be Accompanied By A Bid Security In Any Of The Acceptable Forms And In The Amount Stated In Itb Clause 18. Deadline Of Submission Of Eligibility Requirements And Opening Of Bids: October 14, 2024 10:00am Bac Secretariat 4/f Conference Room City Administrator’s Office City Hall Bldg., San Pedro, Laguna Pre-bid Conference: September 30, 2024 Bid Opening Shall Be On The Same Date And Time For Deadline Of Submission Of Eligibility Requirements And Submission Of Bids And Shall Be Conducted At The Office Of Bac Secretariat. Bids Will Be Opened In The Presence Of The Bidders’ Representatives Who Choose To Attend At The Address Given Above. Late Bids Shall Not Be Accepted. 6. The City Government Of San Pedro, Laguna Assumes No Responsibility Whatsoever To Compensate Or Indemnify Bidders For Any Expenses Incurred In The Preparation Of Their Bid. Further, City Government Of San Pedro, Laguna, Reserves The Right To Accept Or Reject Any Bid, To Annul The Bidding Process, And To Reject All Bids At Any Time Prior To Contract Award, Without Thereby Incurring Any Liability To The Affected Bidder Or Bidders. 7. For Further Information, Please Refer To: Mr. Merlin B. Paala Office Of The Bac Secretariat Telefax No. 8847.1722 (signed)atty. Henry B. Salazar Chairman City Bids And Awards Committee

Details: (i) This Is A Combined Synopsis/solicitation For Commercial Items Prepared In Accordance With The Format In Far Subpart 12.6, As Supplemented With Additional Information Included In This Notice. This Announcement Constitutes The Only Solicitation; Proposals Are Being Requested And A Written Solicitation Will Not Be Issued. intent To Solicit Only One Source the Proposed Contract Action Is For Supplies Or Services For Which The Government Is Soliciting And Negotiating With Only One Source Under The Authority Of Far 13.106-1(b)(1)(i): “only One Responsible Source And No Other Supplies Or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements”. The Name Of The Company The Government Intends To Award A Contract To Is Materialise Usa Llc (44650 Helm Court, Plymouth, Mi 48170-6061, Cage Code: 1m9v8). This Notice Of Intent Is Not A Request For Competitive Proposals. However, The Government Will Consider All Proposals Received Prior To The Closing Date And Time Of This Solicitation. (ii) The Solicitation Number Is W911qx-24-q-0287. This Acquisition Is Issued As A Request For Quotation (rfq). (iii) The Solicitation Document And Incorporated Provisions And Clauses Are Those In Effect Through Federal Acquisition Circular 2024-05 Effective 05/22/2024. (iv) The Associated Naics Code Is 513210. The Small Business Size Standard Is $47,000,000. (v) The Following Is A List Of Contract Line Item Number(s) And Items, Quantities And Units Of Measure, (including Option(s), If Applicable): clin 0001 mimics Base / Commercial Maintenance qty Four (4) Each Mimics Base Commercial Maintenance Licenses For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. clin 0002 mimics Base / Commercial Renewal qty One (1) Each Mimics Base Commercial Renewal License For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. clin 0003 analysis / Commercial Maintenance qty Four (4) Each Mimics Analysis Commercial Maintenance Licenses For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. clin 0004 analysis / Commercial Renewal qty One (1) Each Mimics Analysis Commercial Renewal License For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. (vi) Description Of Requirements: clin 0001 qty Four (4) Each Mimics Base Commercial Maintenance Licenses For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. delivery: October 19, 2024 clin 0002 qty One (1) Each Mimics Base Commercial Renewal License For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. delivery: October 19, 2024 clin 0003 qty Four (4) Each Mimics Analysis Commercial Maintenance Licenses For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. delivery: October 19, 2024 clin 0004 qty One (1) Each Mimics Analysis Commercial Renewal License For 10/19/2024 – 10/18/2025. delivery: October 19, 2024 (vii) Delivery Is Required By clin 0001- Clin 0004 By October 19, 2024. delivery Shall Be Made To And Acceptance Shall Be Performed At Ccdc Data And Analysis Center, 6896 M Auchly Street, Aberdeen Proving Ground Md 21005. The Fob Point Is Destination. (viii) The Provision At 52.212-1, Instructions To Offerors – Commercial, Applies To This Acquisition. The Following Addenda Have Been Attached To This Provision: None (ix) The Provision At Far 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items Is Applicable To This Acquisition. The Specific Evaluation Criteria To Be Included In Paragraph (a) Of That Provision Are As Follows: N/a, See Notice Of Intent To Sole Source Above. (x) Offerors Shall Include A Completed Copy Of The Provision At Far 52.212-3 (with Its Alternate I), Offeror Representations With Its Offer. (xi) The Clause At 52.212-4, Contract Terms And Conditions - Commercial Items, Applies To This Acquisition. The Following Addenda Have Been Attached To This Clause: None (xii) The Clause At 52.212-5, Contract Terms And Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or Executive Orders - Commercial Items And The Selected Clauses Listed In Dfars 212.301 Solicitation Provisions And Contract Clauses For The Acquisition Of Commercial Items, Applies To This Acquisition. The Following Additional Far/dfars Clauses Cited In This Clause Are Applicable: 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation And First-tier Subcontract Awards (jun 2020) 52.204-23 Prohibition On Contracting For Hardware, Software, And Services Developed Or Provided By Kaspersky Lab And Other Covered Entities (nov 2021) 52.204-25 Prohibition Of Contracting For Certain Telecomunications And Video Surveillance Services Or Equipment (nov 2021) 52.204-27 Prohibition On A Bytedance Covered Application (jun 2023) 52.209-6 Protecting The Government’s Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, Or Proposed For Debarment (nov 2021) 52.209-10 Prohibition On Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations (nov 2015) 52.219-28 Post-award Small Business Program Rerepresentation (mar 2023) 52.222-3 Convict Labor (jun 2003) 52.222-19 Child Labor—cooperation With Authorities And Remedies (feb 2024) 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities (apr 2015) 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity (sep 2016) 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity For Workers With Disabilities (jun 2020) 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking In Persons (nov 2021) 52.223-20 Aerosols (may 2024) 52.225-13 Restrictions On Certain Foreign Purchases (feb 2021) 52.226-8 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving (may 2024) 52.232-33 Payment By Electronic Funds Transfer—system For Award Management (oct 2018) 52.232-36 Payment By Third Party (may 2014) 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments To Small Business Subcontractors (mar 2023) 52.233-3 Protest After Award (aug 1996) 52.233-4 Applicable Law For Breach Of Contract Claim (oct 2004) see Dfars Commercial Clauses In Provisions And Clauses Full-text Attachment For Applicable Dfars Clauses (xiii) The Following Additional Contract Requirement(s) Or Terms And Conditions Apply (full Text Of All Far/dfars Clauses That Contain Fill-in Information, As Well As All Local Clauses, Can Be Found In The Attached Provisions And Clauses Full-text Document): provisions: 52.204-7 System For Award Management (oct 2018) 52.204-16 Commercial And Government Entity Code Reporting (aug 2020) 52.204-17 Ownership Or Control Of Offeror (aug 2020) 52.204-20 Predecessor Of Offeror (aug 2020) 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications And Video Surveillance Services Or Equipment (nov 2021) 52.204-26 Covered Telecommunications Equipment Or Services—representation (oct 2020) 52.207-4 Economic Purchase Quantity—supplies (aug 1987) 52.212-1 Instructions To Offerors—commercial Products And Commercial Services (sep 2023) 52.212-3 Offeror Representations And Certifications—commercial Products And Commercial Services (may 2024) 52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated By Reference (feb 1998) clauses: 52.204-13 System For Award Management Maintenance (oct 2018) 52.204-18 Commercial And Government Entity Code Maintenance (aug 2020) 52.213-2 Invoices (apr 1984) 52.247-34 F.o.b. Destination (nov 1991) 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product (apr 1992) 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission Of Payment Requests And Receiving Reports (dec 2018) 252.232-7006 Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (jan 2023) local Provisions: solicit Only One Source exceptions In Proposal award Of Contract adelphi Contr. Division Url foreign Nationals Performing payment Terms local Clauses: acc - Apg Point Of Contact technical Point Of Contact type Of Contract gov Inspection And Acceptance subscription And Software Platform Renewals tax Exemption Cert. (dac) payment Instructions receiving Room – Apg dfars Commercial Clauses army Contract Writing System (acws) Transition Information For Contractors (xiv) This Acquisition Is Rated Under The Defense Priorities And Allocations System (dpas) As N/a (xv) The Following Notes Apply To This Announcement: In Accordance With Far 32.003, Contract Financing Cannot Not Be Provided For This Acquisition. (xvi) Offers Are Due Five (5) Business Days After Posting By 11:59am Est To Acquisition Specialist, Courtney Betts At Courtney.a.betts2.ctr@army.mil. (xvii) For Information Regarding This Solicitation, Please Contact Courtney Betts, Courtney.a.betts2.ctr@army.mil.

Details: Modification 01: The Pre-solicitation Notice Issued On 27 June 2024 Is Modified To Include The Contractors' Questions And Government Responses And Revised Small Business Subcontracting Record. The Questions And Responses Are Provided For Information Purposes Only. The Response Date/time Remains Unchanged. modification 02: The Pre-solicitation Notice Issued On 27 June 2024 Is Modified To Extend The Response Date/time From 30 July 2024 At 2:00pm Hawaii Standard Time To 29 August 2024 At 2:00pm Hawaii Standard Time. modification 03: The Pre-solicitation Notice Issued On 27 June 2024 Is Modified To Extend The Response Date/time From 29 August 2024 At 2:00pm Hawaii Standard Time To 12 September 2024 At 2:00pm Hawaii Standard Time. n62742-24-r-0001 Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract For Architect-engineer Services For Various Electrical Engineering Projects And Related Services At Various Locations In All Areas Under Cognizance Of Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific description: All Information Needed For Interested Parties To Submit A Standard Form Sf 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications Is Contained Herein. There Is No Separate Request For Proposals (rfp) Package To Download. this Procurement Will Result In One Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (idiq) Contract For Multi-discipline Architect-engineer (ae) Services For Various Electrical Related Projects With Associated Multi-discipline Architect-engineering Support Services Under The Cognizance Of Navfac Pacific, But May Also Include Work Worldwide. These Services Will Be Procured In Accordance With 40 Usc Chapter 11, Selection Of Architects And Engineers, As Implemented By Far Subpart 36.6. The Idiq Contract Will Be For A Base Period Of One Year And Four One-year Option Periods (if Exercised). The Total Fee For The Contract Term Shall Not Exceed $249,000,000. The Guaranteed Minimum For The Contract Term (including Option Years) Is $10,000. Firm-fixed Price Task Orders Will Be Negotiated For This Contract. The Government Will Determine The Delivery Order Amount By Using Rates Negotiated And Negotiate The Effort Required To Perform The Particular Project Work Assignment. There Will Be No Dollar Limit Per Task Order And No Dollar Limit Per Year. Estimated Start Date Is March 2025. this Proposed Contract Is Being Solicited On An Unrestricted Basis. The Small Business Size Standard Classification Is North American Industrial Classification System (naics) Code 541330, Engineering Services. The Government Seeks The Most Highly Qualified Firm To Perform The Required Services, Based On The Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications, In Accordance With The Selection Criteria. the Type Of Architectural-engineering Services Expected To Be Performed Under This Contract Are, But Are Not Limited To: ae Services Include, But Are Not Limited To, Engineering Studies; Preparation Of Dd1391 Documents; Plans, Specifications, And Cost Estimates/parametric Cost Estimates Including Preparation Of Design-build Request For Proposal (rfp’s) Contract Documents Or Design Bid Build Contract Documents; Functional Analysis & Conceptual Design (facd) Development; As Built Drawings; And Post Construction Services. Projects May Involve New Construction, Alteration, Repair, And Installation Of Electrical Facilities And Systems. all Contractors Are Advised That A Unique Entity Identifier Is Required Prior To Award. Contract Must Complete The Registration In System For Award Management (sam) Database By Selecting “entity Information”. Failure To Register In The Sam Database May Render Your Firm Ineligible For Award. For More Information, Check The Sam Web Site (https://www.sam.gov) Entity Information Section. the Awarded Contract Will Be Subject To Specific Provisions Addressing The Avoidance Of Organizational Conflicts Of Interest. The Prime Firm For This Contract Will Be Required To Perform Throughout The Contract Term. interviews May Be Scheduled With Firms Slated As The Most Highly Qualified. Firms Slated For Interviews May Be Asked To Clarify Information Contained In The Sf330 Submittal. Elaborate Presentations Are Not Desired. selection Criteria: firms Responding To This Synopsis Will Be Evaluated To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms To Perform The Required Services In Accordance With The Published Selection Criteria. Failure To Comply With Instructions, Or Provide Complete Information May Affect The Firm’s Evaluation Or Disqualify The Firm From Further Consideration. The Following Selection Criterion, In Descending Order Of Importance, Will Be Used To Evaluate The Qualifications Of The Firm. Specific Selection Criteria Include: 1. Specialized Experience 2. Key Personnel Experience And Professional Qualifications 3. Past Performance 4. Capacity 5. Design Quality Control Program (dqcp) 6. Commitment To Small Business 7. Firm Location 8. Volume Of Work criterion 1- Specialized Experience (sf330, Part I, Section F): firms Will Be Evaluated On Specialized Experience In Performance Of Services Similar To Those Anticipated Under This Contract Through Evaluation Of Experience In Relevant Projects: design And Engineering Services Of Electrical Exterior Primary Distribution, Substations, Power Generation, Secondary Distribution, Waterfront Electrical Systems, Telecommunications Systems, And Communications/electronics Type Facilities And Data Centers In Tropical Environments Similar To The Pacific Ocean Areas, And design And Engineering Services In The Execution Of Dd Form 1391 Or Similar Project Programming Documents, Or Design Charrettes, Db Rfp Solicitation Documents, Or Dbb Design Contract Documents. a Relevant Project Must Be: approximately $20 Million Or More In Construction Value; And design And Engineering Services Completed Within The Past 10 Years. firms May Be Considered More Favorably By Demonstrating The Following: submission Of Relevant Projects With More Variety Of Specialized Experience And Within Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, Japan, Korea, And Other Pacific Ocean Areas Within The Navfac Area Of Responsibility Will Be More Favorably Considered. relevant Projects Performed As A Prime Contractor. submission Requirements: Provide A Maximum Of Five (5) Relevant Projects Completed Within The Past Ten (10) Years Immediately Preceding The Date Of Issuance Of This Notice That Best Demonstrate Specialized Experience Of The Proposed Team In The Areas Outlined Above. Sufficient Information To Determine The Date Of Completion Of The Project Must Be Included In The Project Description Or The Project Will Not Be Considered. A Relevant Project Is Approximately $20 Million Or More In Construction Value And Design And Engineering Services Completed. If More Than The Maximum Number Of Projects Are Submitted, The Government Will Only Evaluate Projects Up To The Maximum Number Authorized In The Order Submitted. A Project Is Defined As Either A Stand-alone Contract Or A Single Task Order In An Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (idiq) Contract. Do Not Submit An Idiq Contract As An Example Project. The Government Will Not Evaluate Information Provided For An Idiq Contract And Will Only Evaluate Individual Task Order Information all Projects Provided In The Sf330 Must Be Completed By The Actual Office/branch/regional Office/individual Team Member Proposed To Manage And Perform Work Under This Contract. Projects Not Meeting This Requirement Will Be Excluded From Consideration In The Evaluation. To Enable Verification, Firms Should Include The Unique Entity Identifiernumber Along With Each Firm Name In The Sf330 Part 1, Section F, Block 25, “firm Name” Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification Number In Block 21. Include An E-mail Address And Phone Number For The Point Of Contact In Block 23(c). In Block 24, Include In The Project Description The Contract Period Of Performance, Award Contract Value, Current Contract Value, And A Summary Of The Work Performed That Demonstrates Relevance To Specialized Experience As Outlined Above. For Projects Performed As A Subcontractor Or A Joint Venture Involving Different Partners, Specifically Indicate The Value Of The Work Performed As A Subcontractor Or By Those Firms Proposed For This Contract, And Identify The Specific Roles And Responsibilities Performed As A Subcontractor Or By Those Firms On The Project Rather Than The Work Performed On The Project As A Whole. If The Project Description Does Not Clearly Delineate The Work Performed By The Entity/entities Offering/teaming On This Contract, The Project Could Be Eliminated From Consideration. note: If The Firm Is A Joint Venture, Projects Performed By The Joint Venture Should Be Submitted; However, If There Are No Projects Performed By The Joint Venture, Projects May Be Submitted For Either Joint Venture Partner, Not To Exceed A Total Of Five (5) Relevant Projects. Firms Failing To Provide Projects From All Joint Venture Partners Will Be Considered To Have Not Met The Requirements Of The Criterion. Prime Contractor-sub-contractor/jvs/llcs/ltds With A Demonstrated History Of Working Successfully Together On Prior Projects Will Be Considered More Favorably Than Those Without Such History. projects Shall Be Submitted On The Sf-330 At Part I, Section F And Shall Be Completed Projects. Projects Not Completed Will Be Excluded From Evaluation Consideration. For Submittal Purposes, A Task Order On An Idiq Contract Is Considered A Project, As Is A Stand-alone Contract Award. Do Not Submit An Idiq Contract As An Example Project. Instead, List Relevant Task Orders Or Stand-alone Contract Awards That Fit Within The Definition Above. The Government Will Not Evaluate Information Provided For An Idiq Contract. Examples Of Project Work Submitted That Do Not Conform To This Requirement Will Not Be Evaluated. all Information For Criterion 1 Should Be Submitted In The Sf330, Part I, Section F Of The. The Government Will Not Consider Information Submitted In Addition To Part 1, Section F In Evaluation Of Criterion 1. criterion 2-key Personnel Experience And Professional Qualifications (sf330, Part I, Sections E & G): firms Will Be Evaluated On Professional Qualifications, Competence, And Experience Of The Proposed Key Personnel In Providing Services To Accomplish The Tasks Required Under This Contract, Including Participation In Example Projects As Outlined In The Sf330, Part 1, Section G. Key Personnel Are Individuals Who Will Have Major Contract Or Project Management Responsibilities And/or Will Provide Unusual Or Unique Expertise. Specific Disciplines That Must Be Included In Key Personnel Are: principal-in-charge Of The Prime A-e Firm prime Electrical Project Manager prime Electrical Engineer project Architect mechanical Project Engineer civil Project Engineer structural Project Engineer fire Protection Project Engineer geotechnical Project Engineer cost Estimator note: The Principal-in-charge Of The Prime A-e Firm May Be The Same Person On Both Teams. All Other Key Personnel Cannot Be The Same Individual For Both Teams. Limit To A Single Individual Per Team For Each Key Personnel Category. more Favorable Consideration May Be Given For Key Personnel Demonstrating The Following: specialized Experience In Relevant Projects. relevant Projects With More Variety Of Specialized Experience And Within Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, Japan, Korea, And Other Pacific Ocean Areas Within The Navfac Area Of Responsibility. note: Specialized Experience And A Relevant Project Are Defined In Criterion 1. submission Requirements: sf330, Part I, Section E. Provide Resumes For All Proposed Key Personnel That Illustrate Relevant Project Experience. Resumes Are Limited To Two (2) Single-sided Pages And Should Indicate: Professional Registration, Certification, Licensure And/or Accreditation In Appropriate Disciplines; Cite Recent (within The Past Ten Years) Relevant Project-specific Experience In Work Relevant To The Services Required Under This Contract (maximum Of Five (5) Relevant Projects)); And Indicate Proposed Role In This Contract. Identify Key Personnel For Two (2) Design Teams. Key Personnel For Each Team Shall Be Limited To The Following: Principal-in-charge Of The Prime Ae Firm, Prime Electrical Project Manager, Prime Electrical Engineer, Project Architect, Mechanical Project Engineer, Civil Project Engineer, Structural Project Engineer, Fire Protection Project Engineer, Geotechnical Project Engineer, And Cost Estimator. Professional Qualifications For Proposed Key Personnel, Include Active U.s. Professional Architect/engineer Registration (include State And Discipline, E.g., P.e. – Hawaii, Electrical). Professional Architect/engineer Registration For Cost Estimator Is Not Required. Professional Qualifications Of Personnel Of The Design Teams Other Than The Key Personnel Shall Not Be Submitted, And If Submitted, Will Not Be Considered In The Evaluation. Indicate Participation Of Key Personnel In Example Projects In The Sf330, Part 1, Section G. criterion 3- Past Performance (sf330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On Past Performance With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Work Quality, Compliance With Schedules, Cost Control, And Stakeholder/customer Satisfaction. Evaluating Past Performance And Experience Will Include Information Provided In Past Performance Questionnaires (ppqs) Or Cpars For Criterion 1 Projects And May Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Other Information Available To The Government Including Contacts With Points Of Contact In Other Criteria. Note: Past Performance Information For Projects Listed Under Criterion 1 May Be Given Greater Weight. submission Requirements: submit A Completed Cpars Evaluation For Each Project Under Criterion 1. If A Completed Cpars Evaluation Is Not Available, The Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) (attachment (a)) Included In This Notice Is Provided For The Firm Or Its Team Members To Submit To The Client For Each Project Included Under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. Do Not Submit A Ppq When A Completed Cpars Is Available. if A Cpars Evaluation Is Not Available, Ensure Correct Phone Numbers And Email Addresses Are Provided For The Client Point Of Contact. Completed Ppqs Should Be Submitted With Your Sf330. If The Firm Is Unable To Obtain A Completed Ppq From A Client For A Project(s) Before The Response Date Set Forth In This Notice, Firms Should Complete And Submit With Their Responses The First Page Of The Ppq (attachment (a)), Which Will Provide Contract And Client Information For The Respective Project(s). Firms May Submit A Ppq Previously Submitted Under A Different Notice/rfp (legible Copies Are Acceptable) As Long As It Is On The Same Form As Posted With This Synopsis. Firms Should Follow Up With Clients/references To Ensure Timely Submittal Of Questionnaires. If Requested By The Client, Questionnaires May Be Submitted Directly To The Government's Point Of Contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific, Code Con31, Attn: Michelle Gopwani-lee Via Email At Michelle.m.gopwani-lee.civ@us.navy.mil, Prior To The Response Date. Firms Shall Not Incorporate By Reference Into Their Response Ppqs Or Cpars Previously Submitted In Response To Other A/e Services Procurements. However, This Does Not Preclude The Government From Utilizing Previously Submitted Ppq Information In The Past Performance Evaluation. firms May Provide Any Information On Problems Encountered And The Corrective Actions Taken On Projects Submitted Under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms May Also Address Any Adverse Past Performance Issues. Information Shall Not Exceed Two Double-sided Pages (or Four Single-sided Pages) In Total. awards, Letters Of Commendation, Certificates Of Appreciation, Etc. Shall Not Be Submitted And Will Not Be Considered In The Evaluation. a Subconsultant’s Past Performance Will Not Be Given The Same Level Of Consideration As Either The Prime Contractor Or The Joint Venture Partner(s). criterion 4- Capacity (sf330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On The Firm’s Ability To Plan For And Manage Work Under The Contract, The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. submission Requirements: 1. Provide An Organizational Chart For The Team And Discuss The Management Plan For This Contract And Personnel Roles In The Organization. Describe The Ability Of The Firm To Manage, Coordinate And Work Effectively With Team Members, Both Internal Staff And Consultants. Discuss The History Of Working Relationships With Team Members, Including Joint Venture Partners Where Applicable. 2. Describe The Firm’s Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period. Describe The Workload/availability Of The Key Personnel During The Anticipated Contract Performance Period And The Ability Of The Firm To Provide Qualified Backup Staffing For Key Personnel To Ensure Continuity Of Services. General Statements Of Availability/capacity May Be Considered Less Favorably. description Shall Not Exceed Two Double-sided Pages (or Four Single-sided Pages) In Total. If More Than Two Double-sided Pages (or Four Single-sided Pages) Are Submitted, The Government Will Only Evaluate Pages Up To The Maximum Number Authorized In The Order Submitted. General Statements Of Availability Or Capacity May Be Considered Less Favorably. criterion 5- Design Quality Control Program (dqcp) (sf330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated On The Strength Of The Quality Control Program Proposed By The Firm To Ensure Quality Products And Services Under This Contract, And Means Of Ensuring Quality Services From Their Consultants/subcontractors. submission Requirements: describe The Quality Control Program That Will Be Utilized For All Deliverables Of This Contract And The Management Approach For Quality Control Processes And Procedures. The Description Shall: 1. Explain The Quality Control Program Including An Example Of How The Plan Has Worked For One Of The Projects Submitted As Part Of Sf330, Section F Or How The Plan Will Work If It Has Not Been Used Previously. 2. Provide A Quality Control Process Chart Showing The Inter-relationship Of The Management And Team Components. 3. Describe Specific Quality Control Processes And Procedures Proposed For This Contract Including Checking Documents For Errors, Omissions, And Quality, And Incorporating And Tracking Review Comments. 4. Identify The Quality Control Manager And Any Other Key Personnel Responsible For The Quality Control Program And A Description Of Their Roles And Responsibilities. 5. Describe How The Firm’s Quality Control Program Extends To Management Of Subcontractors. criterion 6—commitment To Small Business (sf330, Part I, Section H): firms Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of The Extent To Which They Have Identified And Committed To Small Business (sb), Small Disadvantaged Business (sdb), Women-owned Small Business (wosb), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (hubzonesb), Veteran-owned Small Business (vosb), And Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb), In Performance Of This Contract, Whether As A Joint Venture, Teaming Arrangement, Or Subcontractor. The Government Will Evaluate Proposals Based On: (a) Past Performance In Utilization Of Small Business Concerns, And (b) Participation Of Small Business Concerns For This Requirement. In Support Of (a), All Firms Shall Provide Historical Data On Utilization Of Sb, Sdb, Wosb, Hubzonesb, Vosb, And Sdvosb. Large Businesses Shall Submit “final” Or “most Recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (isrs) For Contracts Associated With Each Project Cited Under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. If Isrs Are Not Final Or Most Recent, They Will Not Be Considered. If Subcontracting Goals Were Not Met, Provide An Explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports Were Not Applicable To The Section F Projects, Large Businesses Shall Submit Other Documentation Which Shows Their Utilization Of The Various Types Of Small Business Firms For The Contracts. Small Businesses Shall Also Submit Documentation Which Shows Their Utilization Of The Various Types Of Small Business Firms For Similar Contracts Of Relative Size. In Support Of (b), Large Businesses Shall Submit A Draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, In Which They Will Be Evaluated On The Extent To Which They Identify And Commit To The Published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary Of The Navy Has Assigned The Naval Facilities Engineering Command Goals For Fy2024 In Terms Of Percentages Of Total Planned Subcontracting Dollars For Utilization Of Small Businesses. Demonstrate The Plan To Meet These Goals: small Business – 40% hubzone – 3% service Disabled Veteran-owned Small Business – 5% small Disadvantaged Business – 5% women-owned Small Business – 9% if A Large Business Firm Is Selected For Award, A Small Business Subcontracting Plan, In Accordance With Far 19.7 And Dfar 219.7, Will Be Required And Incorporated Into The Contract Award. A Draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan Is Not Required From Small Businesses; However, Small Businesses Shall Submit Similar Information On The Extent To Which They Identify And Commit To Subcontracting To Large Business (lb), Sb, Sdb, Wosb, Hubzonesb, Vosb, And Sdvosb If Applicable In The Performance Of This Contract. the Small Business Size Standard Classification Is Naics 541330, Engineering Services, Size Standard $25.5 Million. the Attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (attachment (b)) Shall Be Used By Large Businesses To Complete The Draft Subcontracting Plan. Firms Shall Submit Their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans Utilizing This Template, And Only This Template. all Firms Shall Submit Small Business Subcontracting Information Associated With Each Project Cited Under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience, In The Format Provided In Attachment C, Small Business Subcontracting Record. all Firms Shall Submit A Small Business Participation And Commitment Strategy Including All Data Elements Shown In Attachment D, Small Business Participation And Commitment Strategy. Submission Requirements: identify In Terms Of Dollar Value And Percentage Of The Total Acquisition The Extent Of Work The Firm Will Self-perform As The Prime Contractor. If Submitting An Offer As A Joint Venture, Identify The Percentage Of Work Each Member Will Be Responsible For And Indicate The Size Status Of Each Member (e.g. Small Business, Woman-owned Small Business, Other Than Small Business). include Supplemental Narratives (shall Not Exceed Five Single-sided Pages) To Address Other Elements Of The Firm’s Strategy Such As Binding Agreements Covering Post Award Roles For Execution Of The Contract And Specific Initiatives And Tools That Will Be Employed Under The Contract To Enhance Small Businesses Opportunities To Both Participate In This Acquisition And Build Capabilities To Support Future Navfac Acquisitions. the Anticipated Prime And First Tier Overall Small Business Participation Rate For This Acquisition (i.e. Work To Be Performed By Small Businesses As The Prime And/or Subcontractors) Is 20% Of The Contract Value. Firms Are Encouraged To Exceed This Percentage And Seek Meaningful Levels Of Participation In Each Of The Small Business Socioeconomic Programs Listed In Attachment D Consistent With Efficient Contract Performance. Firms Shall Explain In Their Participation And Commitment Strategies How Proposed Participation Rates Were Established. The Small Business Participation And Commitment Strategy Must Be In Agreement With Any Required Small Business Subcontracting Plan And Will Be Made A Part Of The Contract Upon Award. note: The Government Reserves The Right To Consider Achievements Information On Other Recent, Relevant Projects From All Available Sources. If The Firm Is A New Joint Venture, Partnership Or Other Entity Consisting Of More Than One Company, Provide Achievements Information For Each Individual Business Entity(ies) That Will Be Responsible For Managing The Subcontracting Program And Clearly Describe Those Responsibilities. failure To Provide Isrs Or Any Other Requested Information Must Be Fully Explained And May Negatively Impact Your Evaluation. criterion 7—firm Location (sf330, Part I, Section H) provided That The Application Of This Criterion Leaves An Appropriate Number Of Qualified Firms, Given The Nature And Size Of The Contract, Firms Will Be Evaluated On The Locations Of Their Office Or Offices That Will Be Performing The Work Under This Contract And Demonstrated Knowledge Of The General Geographic Areas In Which Projects Could Be Located. Evaluation Of Firms Will Include Consideration Of Their Location Within The General Geographic Area Of The Anticipated Projects, Primarily Within Hawaii, Guam, Tinian, Diego Garcia, Australia, Japan, Korea, And Other Navfac Pacific Ocean Areas To Be Covered By This Contract. submission Requirements: 1. Indicate Location Of The Office(s) That Will Be Performing The Work, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices, And Offices Of Team Members, Including Subconsultants. 2. Provide A Narrative Describing The Team’s Knowledge Of The Primary Geographic Areas To Be Covered By This Contract. criterion 8—volume Of Work (sf330, Part 1, Section H) firms Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With Dod Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (dfars) Procedures, Guidance And Information (pgi) 236.602-1, From Data Extracted From The Federal Procurement Data System (fpds). Firms Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of Work Previously Awarded To The Firm By Dod Within The Past Twelve Months With The Objective Of Effecting An Equitable Distribution Of Contracts Among Qualified A&e Firms Including Small, Disadvantaged Business Firms, And Firms That Have Not Had Prior Dod A&e Contracts. submission Requirements: firms Do Not Submit Data For This Factor. sf-330 Submission Requirements: architect-engineer Firms Desiring To Be Considered For This Contract Must Submit A Completed Sf-330 Package. The Sf-330 Shall Be Typed, One Sided, At Least 11 Point Times New Roman Or Larger. Part I Shall Not Exceed Seventy-five (75) Single-sided 8.5 By 11 Inch Pages (the Page Limit Does Not Include Isrs, Certificates, Ppqs, Licenses, Or The Draft Subcontracting Plan, As Required By The Small Business Subcontracting Criterion, Nor Does The Page Limit Include Cover Sheets, Dividers, Or Other Requested Documentation (e.g., Joint Venture Agreement, Proof Of Ae Firm Registration) Provided That These Do Not Contain Any Substantive Information Submitted In Response To The Synopsis Or Intended To Demonstrate The Qualifications Of The Firm). Part I Pages Shall Be Numbered Sequentially. The Organizational Chart May Be One Page Single Sided 11 By 17 Foldout, Using 11 Point Font Or Larger (font Limitations Do Not Apply To Graphics, Captions Or Tables). Please Include Your Unique Entity Identifier And Cage Numbers In Block 30 Of The Sf-330. **in Accordance With The Far 36.601-4(b) Contracts For Architect-engineer Services May Only Be Awarded To Firms Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering.. Firms Must Submit Proof That They Are Permitted By Law As Required By Far 36.601-4(b). If A Firm Is In A Jurisdiction That Requires Ae Firm Registration, The Firm Must Provide Proof Of Registration. If A Firm Is In A Jurisdiction That Does Not Require Ae Firm Registration, The Firm Must Provide Proof Eligibility To Practice (e.g., A Summary Explaining Eligibility Under The Laws Of That Jurisdiction). Failure To Submit The Required Proof Could Result In A Firm’s Elimination From Consideration. **firms Who Are Offering As A Joint Venture Should Include With Their Submission A Copy Of The Joint Venture Agreement. Failure To Include The Joint Venture Agreement May Result In The Firm’s Elimination From Further Evaluation. architect-engineer Firms That Meet The Requirements Described In This Announcement Are Invited To Submit Three (3) Paper Copies Of The Sf-330 And One (1) Cd To: for Sf330s Sent Via United States Postal Services (usps): naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific code Con31 (n62742-24-r-0001), Attn: Mgl 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 jbphh, Hi 96860-3134 for Sf330s Sent Via Courier Service Or Hand-delivered: naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific code Con31 (n62742-24-r-0001), Attn: Mgl 4256 Radford Drive, Building 62 honolulu, Hi 96818-3296 firms Responding To This Announcement By 2:00 P.m. Hawaii Standard Time (hst) On 30 July 2024 Will Be Considered. This Is Not A Request For Proposal. late Responses Will Be Handled In Accordance With Far 52.215-1. The Points Of Contact Are Either Michelle Gopwani-lee, Contract Specialist, At Michelle.m.gopwani-lee.civ@us.navy.mil Or Erik S. Torngren, Contracting Officer, At Erik.s.torngren.civ@us.navy.mil. if An Sf 254/sf 255 Is Submitted For This Solicitation, It Will Not Be Reviewed Or Considered. As Required Above, Provide Verifiable Evidence That Your Firm Is Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering (e.g., State Registration Number). electronic (e-mail, Facsimile, Etc.) Submissions Are Not Authorized. inquiries Concerning This Procurement Should Include Solicitation Number And Title And Be Forwarded Via Email To Michelle.m.gopwani-lee.civ@us.navy.mil No Later Than Fifteen (15) Days Of The Closing Date. Questions Submitted After This Date May Not Be Addressed By The Government Due To Time Constraints.