Manpower Tenders
Manpower Tenders
Philippine National Oil Company - PNOC Tender
Manpower Supply
Corrigendum : Tender Amount Updated
Philippines
Description: Supply Of Manpower, Equipment And Supplies For Janitorial Services At Pnoc Industrial Park , Janitorial Services ,philippine National Oil Company - Main Office
Closing Soon4 Feb 2025
Tender AmountPHP 4.5 Million (USD 77.6 K)
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY USA Tender
Transportation and Logistics
United States
Details: A. Summary Of Amendment 002
1. The Defense Logistics Agency (dla) Is Conducting A Commercial Solutions Opening (cso) Authorized By 10 U.s.c. § 3458 And Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, Subpart 212.70, Defense Commercial Solutions Opening. Dla Intends To Solicit Solution Briefs In Response To The Addendum Areas Of Interest (aois), Which Dla May Change, Amend, Open, And Close From Time To Time At Dla’s Sole Discretion. Interested Offerors Are Encouraged To Frequently Check This Cso From New Or Revised Aois. Dla Intends To Keep This Cso Sp4701-24-s-c001 Open Until 11 March 2025; However, Dla Reserves The Right To Close This Cso At Any Time.
2. In Accordance With 10 U.s.c. § 3458(c)(2), Any Contract Or Agreement Dla May Award Under Pursuant To This Cso Shall Be Fixed-price. Dla Intends To Award Commercial Contracts In Accordance With Dfars 212.7002(b); However, Dla May, At Dla’s Discretion, To Award An Other Transaction Agreement In Accordance With 10 U.s.c. § 4022.
3. If You Have Any Questions Or Concerns, Please Contact:
ms. Michelle Harrison
agreements And Contracting Officer
dla Dcso-p5
michelle.harrison@dla.mil
4. Dla Provides No Funding For Any Offer Submitted To This Cso. Dla Funding Is Only Possible After A Signed Contract.
b. Background: Dla Is The Department Of Defense’s Logistics Combat Support Activity. Dla Provides Worldwide Logistical Support To The Military Services And Other Authorized Customers, Which May Include Civilian Organizations And Foreign Countries. Potential Offerors May Learn More About Dla At Htts://www.dla.mil.
c. How To Submit A Solution Brief.
prior To The Closing Date Of The Published Area Of Interest, Electronically Submit To The Person Identified In Paragraph A.3. Of This Cso An Unclassified Solution Brief, Utilizing The Solution Brief Template At Attachment 1.
mark As Appropriate All Parts Of The Solution Brief Considered Proprietary. By Submitting A Solution Brief, The Offeror Agrees To Dfars 252.227-7016, Rights In Bid Or Proposal Information.
the Solution Brief Must ‘stand Alone’. While The Solution Brief May Include References To Outside Materials, Links To Website, Etc., Dla Will Not And Can Not Consider Such Material. Similarly, Dla Will Not Consider Any Accompanying Slides, Sales Materials, Integrated Or Outside Videos, Or The Like Sent With The Solution Brief. Dla May Reject, Without Further Consideration, Solution Briefs Sent With Extraneous Materials.
offerors May Submit Multiple Solution Briefs For Each Aoi. While Each Solution Brief May Reference Another Solution Brief, Dla Will Not And Can Not Consider That Referenced Solution Brief In Evaluating This Submitted Solution Brief.
solution Briefs’ Prices And All Other Terms And Conditions Must Remain Valid For 180 Calendar Days From The Submission Date Of The Solution Brief.
d. How Dla Will Make Any Awards.
1. Dla Will First Review Solution Briefs For Conformance With This Cso. Dla Will Return Solution Briefs Dla Finds Not In Conformance With This Cso. The Offeror May, If The Date And Time Stated In The Area Of Interest Has Not Passed, Re-submit A Revised Solution Brief. While Dla Intends To Complete This Review Diligently, Dla Is Under No Obligation To Complete This Review Soon Enough For An Offeror To Submit A Revised Solution Brief. Therefore, Offerors Should Submit Their Best, Conforming, Solution Briefs.
2. For Solution Briefs Both Received Before The Closing Time Of Cso And Aoi, And Also Conforming To The Cso, Dla Subject-matter Expert Technical Evaluators Will Evaluate The Solution Brief. First, Evaluators Will Evaluate Factor 1, Possibility Of Funding, And Rate The Solution Brief As Either “funding Possible” Or “funding Not Possible”. If Evaluated As “funding Not Possible,” Evaluators Will Not Evaluate The Solution Brief Further And Dla Will Notify The Offeror. If Evaluated As “funding Possible,” Evaluators Will Continue Their Evaluations Through The Remaining Factors, Assigning Each Remaining Factor One Of The Following Ratings: “exceptional,” “good,” “acceptable,” “marginal,” Or “unacceptable.” All Evaluation Factors Are Described Below.
A. Factor 1: Possibility Of Funding. Does Funding Reasonably Exist To Fund The Proposed Solution? Solutions With Lower Prices Are Favored.
B. Factor 2: Technical Feasibility. How Technically Feasible Is The Proposed Solution To An Aoi, Given The Present State Of The Technology And Science? Solutions With A Lower Technological Risk Profile Are Favored.
C. Factor 3: Responsiveness. How Responsive Is The Proposed Solution To The Aoi? Solutions Responsive To The Problem Identified In The Aoi, Without Creating New Problems, Are Favored.
D. Factor 4: Viability. How Viable Is The Proposed Solution Given Existing Organizational And Regulatory Environments? Solutions Compatible With Existing Dla, Dod, And Federal Policies, Processes, And Procedures, Are Favored.
E. Factor 5: Desirability. How Desirable Is The Proposed Solution To The Eventual End-user? Solutions Easily Adaptable, Useful, And Implementable Are Favored.
3. After The Above Evaluation, The Technical Evaluators Will Then Decide Whether The Solution Proposed In The Solution Brief Merits Further Consideration. Note That While Solution Briefs Are Not Evaluated Against Other Solution Briefs, Dla Has Limited Funding And Acquisition Manpower And Thus Cannot Pursue All Otherwise Meritorious Solution Briefs. Dla Also Recognizes That Industry Resources In Pursing Business With Dla Are Limited. To The Extent Dla Must Select Between Highly Rated Solution Briefs To Pursue Further, Dla Will Aggregate The Factor 2 Through 5 Ratings Together Equally To Discern The Most Highly Rated Solution Briefs. If Further Discernment Is Necessary Amongst Highly Rated Solution Briefs, Dla Will Then Additionally Consider The Factor 2 Through 5 Ratings In Order Of Importance, With Factor 2 Being The Most Important, Factor 3 Being The Second Most Important, Factor 4 Being The Third Most Important, And Factor 5 Being The Fourth Most Important. And If Still Additional Discernment Is Necessary, Dla Will Then Consider The Price Proposed In The Solution Brief And Select For Further Consideration The Lowest Priced Solution Brief.
4. If The Technical Evaluators Decide A Proposed Solution Brief Merits Further Consideration, Technical Evaluators Will Decide Whether To Further Consider The Proposed Solution Via A Pitch, Full Proposal, Or Both. Technical Evaluators May Also Decide A Pitch Or Full Proposal, Or Both, Are Unnecessary, And Refer A Solution Brief For Negotiation Of A Possible Award As Described In Paragraph 5.
A. Pitch: Dla Would Invite The Offeror To ‘pitch’ The Offeror’s Proposed Solution In A Presentation, Whether Via A Remote Meeting, A Face-to-face Meeting, Or Other Mutually Agreeable Means. Dla Will Advise The Offeror Of The Parameters Of The Pitch At That Time. Offerors May Propose Different Parameters; However, The Final Decision Rests With Dla, As Represented By The Person Noted In Paragraph A(3). During The Pitch, The Parties May Verbally Discuss The Proposed Solution. After The Pitch, Dla Will Decide Whether An Additional Pitch Is Desired, To Request A Full Proposal, Refer The Offeror To The Supporting Contracting Activity For Award Negotiations, Or To Terminate Further Consideration Of The Offer.
B. Full Proposal: Dla Would Invite The Offeror To Submit A Full Proposal. Dla Will Advise The Offeror Of The Parameters Of The Full Proposal At That Time. Offerors May Propose Different Parameters; However, The Final Decision Rests With Dla. After Receipt Of The Full Proposal, Dla May Communicate With The Offeror About The Full Proposal, To Better Understand And Review It. After Reviewing The Full Proposal, Dla Will Decide Whether An Additional Or Revised Full Proposal Is Desired, To Request A ‘pitch’, Refer The Offeror To The Supporting Contracting Activity For Award Negotiations, Or To Terminate Further Consideration Of The Offer.
5. If The Technical Evaluators Refer An Offeror To The Supporting Contracting Activity For Award Negotiations, The Supporting Contracting Activity Will Open Negotiations With The Offeror. The Conduct Of Such Negotiations Are Within The Discretion Of The Cognizant Contracting Officer Or Agreement Officer, As The Case May Be, As Bounded By Applicable Law And Policy. Offerors Should Note That The Contracting Officer, Or Agreement Officer, Is Not Required To Award Any Contract And May Close Negotiations At Any Time At His Or Her Discretion. Offerors Should Further Note That Should Any In Negotiation Resulting In An Award, The Prices Awarded Must Be ‘fair And Reasonable’.
e. Generally Applicable Information.
1. Dla Provides No Funds For Partaking In Any Process Described In This Cso. Any Funds Will Be Disbursed Only In Accordance With A Signed Contract Or Other Transaction Agreement.
2. Should Dla Award An Other Transaction Agreement Awarded Under This Cso, Dla May Later Award A Follow-on Production Contract Or Other Transaction Agreement Without Further Competition, In Accordance With 10 U.s.c. § 4022.
3. Note That Chapter 21 Of Title 41, United States Code, Applies To All Submitted Proposals And Any Awarded Contract, Whether Awarded Under The Far Or 10 U.s.c. § 4022.
4. Note That Dla Can Only Award To A Responsible Entity. Please See Far Part 9 For Further Information.
attachments:
1) Dla Cso Sp4701-24-s-c001 Solution Brief Application (conformed Through Amendment 002)
addendums:
1) Area Of Interest 01: Direct Vendor Delivery Tracking (dvdt)
Closing Date11 Mar 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE USA Tender
Civil And Construction...+3Building Construction, Consultancy Services, Civil And Architectural Services
Corrigendum : Closing Date Modified
United States
Details: Continuing A Legacy Of Outstanding Public Architecture, The General Services Administration (gsa) Seeks To Commission Our Nation’s Most Talented Architects, Landscape Architects, Interior Designers, Engineers And Construction Professionals To Design And Construct Federal Facilities Of Outstanding Quality And Value. These Projects Are To Demonstrate The Value Of True Integrated Design That Balances Aesthetics, Functionality, Cost, Constructability, Durability And Reliability; Create Environmentally Responsible And Superior Workplaces For Federal Employees And Give Contemporary Form And Meaning To Our Democratic Values.
in This Context, Gsa Announces An Opportunity For Design And Construction Excellence In Public Architecture For Performance Of Architectural Engineering Design And Construction Services In Accordance With Gsa Quality Standards And Requirements. As Required By Law, Regulation Or Executive Order, All Facilities Will Meet Performance Targets And Security Requirements.
gsa Intends To Award A Design-build (db) Contract For The Repair Or Replacement Of The Plaza And Structural Support System Of The Howard M. Metzenbaum U.s. Courthouse (metzenbaum) In Cleveland, Oh, Pursuant To The Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Two-phase Design-build Selection Procedures (far 36.3). The Project Includes Design-build Services.
this Project Will Take Place At The Howard M. Metzenbaum U.s. Courthouse In Cleveland, Oh. The Metzenbaum Courthouse, Built Between 1903 And 1910, Is A Five-story Structure Designed In The Neoclassical Style. It Is One Of The Most Significant Structures In Cleveland’s Downtown Cityscape And Is Listed In The National Register Of Historic Places. The Facade Is Clad With Granite And Remains Essentially The Same As When It Was Originally Constructed. Between 2002 And 2005, The Courthouse Was Modernized For The Primary Use Of The Bankruptcy Courts After The District Courts Relocated To The Newly Constructed Stokes Courthouse.
the Metzenbaum U.s. Courthouse Is Located At The Center Of Cleveland Ohio’s Public Square. This Prominent Location Adds To The Building’s Status As A Cleveland Landmark. The Building Is Surrounded On Three Sides By A Plaza That Addresses The Public Square. The Plaza Is Heavily Trafficked By Pedestrians And Supports Two Priceless Daniel Chester French Statues That Are Part Of The Gsa’s Public Art Collection.
the Plaza’s Concrete, Waterproofing Membrane, And Most Of Its Supporting Steel Framing Was Last Replaced In 1972, And The Top Slab Was Replaced In 1987. Shoring Was Installed Over A Decade Ago To Support The Sidewalk Vault Structurally And To Prevent The Public Sidewalk From Collapsing. Maintenance And Repairs Are No Longer Sufficient For Preventing Water Leaks Through The Plaza.
the Plaza’s Concrete Structural Slab Is Failing. Widespread Deterioration Under The Plaza’s Structural Slab Ranges From Small Spalls To Large Areas Of Complete Delamination. The Damage Has Gone Beyond Concrete And Reinforcing Deterioration To Significant Loss Of Structural Steel Sections. The Steel Can Be Restored In Some Areas But Will Have To Be Replaced In Others. The Elevator Lift That Serves The Mail Screening Room In The Basement Must Remain Operational During The Project And Will Be Used By The Construction Contractor For Vertical Conveyance. Refurbishment Of The Lift Will Be Required After The Plaza Work Is Completed.
the Foundation Wall’s Lack Of Waterproofing Allows Moisture And Water To Infiltrate Through Several Cracks. Waterproofing That Was Applied In Previous Slab Replacement Projects Only Goes Down A Few Feet Below Grade And Has Worn Away. The Remainder Of The Foundation Wall Has No Waterproofing. The Wall Moisture Has Corroded The Full Height Of The Vertical Steel Channels At The Inside Face Of The Wall That Are Likely A Key Part Of The Wall’s Strength.
the Two Significant Daniel Chester French Statues Are Located On The South Elevation Of The Building. The Statues Are Supported By Both The Building Exterior Wall And The Sidewalk Slab. Movement And Deterioration Of The Sidewalk Slab Create A Risk Of Cracking In The Statues. The Original Clay Tile Floor Slab Supporting The Base Of The Statues Has Fallen Away, Leaving Only Unreinforced Cement Topping Between The Steel Beams And The Statue Base. A New Support System Needs To Be Installed To Isolate The Statues From The Sidewalk Slab.
this Project Seeks Design Build Services For The Improvements Necessary To Repair Or Replace The Plaza And Its Structural Support System For The Safety Of Tenants And Visitors And Long Term Stabilization Of The Property.
this Project Will Utilize The Design-build (db) Delivery Method, With The Db Contract Procured By Competitive Negotiation Using A Two-phase Design-build Selection Procedure (far 36.3). A Single Db Contract Will Be Issued For A Design Concept Submission, Design Development Phase And Construction Documents Phase Services, As Well As All Construction Work. For This Contract Award Process, Gsa Will Issue A Solicitation Consisting Of Phase I And Phase Ii, Respectively.
the Purpose Of Phase I (the Request For Qualifications) Is To Select The Most Highly Qualified Offerors From Phase I To Participate In Phase Ii (the Request For Proposals). At The Conclusion Of Phase I, Gsa Will Invite The Short-listed Offerors To Submit Phase Ii Proposals. Phase Ii Proposals Will Require Submission Of Technical And Price Proposals, Which Are Evaluated Separately In Accordance With Far Part 15. Potential Offerors Are Hereby Placed On Notice That Gsa Will Publicly Announce The Names Of The Phase I “short-list” On Sam.gov.
the Technical Evaluation Factors For Phase I Are As Follows:
technical Qualifications
a. Subfactor 1.a: Experience Of The General Contractor And A/e 40 Points
b. Subfactor 1.b: Past Performance Of The General Contractor And A/e 15 Points
approach To Design Build 20 Points
lead Designer 25 Points
total Points = 100
the Maximum Number Of Shortlisted Offers Advancing To Phase Ii Will Be Three (3).
the Technical Evaluation Factors For Phase Ii Are As Follows:
1. Quality Of Design Concept 40 Points
2. Qualifications, Experience And Past Performance Of Key Personnel 20 Points
3. Management And Technical Approach 20 Points
4. Sustainability 15 Points
5. Small Business Utilization 5 Points
Total Points = 100
in Consideration Of The Preparation Of A Phase Ii Technical Proposal, Gsa Will Pay A Stipend Of $52,500.00 To Each Of The Phase Ii Offerors Who Satisfy The Terms Of The Request For Proposals, But Are Not Selected For Award Of The Resulting Contract.
at The Conclusion Of Phase Ii, Gsa Intends To Award A Contract To A Single Offeror For All Design And Construction Services.
this Contract Will Be A Full And Open Procurement, Available To Both Large And Small Business Firms. As Part Of The Phase Ii Proposal, Large Business Offerors Will Be Required To Submit An Acceptable Small Business Subcontracting Plan In Accordance With Far Part 19.7.
the Request For Qualifications Will Be Issued Electronically On Or About January 29, 2025. A Pre-proposal Meeting Will Be Held On Or About February 12, 2025 In Cleveland, Oh At 1:00pm Est. Prospective Attendees Are To Register Their Company With The Gsa Contracting Officer, Anna Vanko, Via Email At Anna.vanko@gsa.gov For All Individuals Planning To Attend. A. Call In Reservations Will Not Be Accepted. This Meeting Is Intended To Review The Scope Of The Project And The Submittal Requirements For Phase I. Please Note, Contractors Will Be Required To Wear A Hardhat For A Portion Of The Walk-through. Hardhats Must Be Provided By The Offeror; Gsa Is Unable To Provide Hardhats For Those Participating. An Additional Site Visit And Pre-proposal Conference Will Be Scheduled During The Phase Ii Portion As Well.
award Is Anticipated In March Of 2026 With Substantial Completion Anticipated In Winter 2029/2030.
the Estimated Cost Range Is Between $18,000,000 And $28,000,000.
this Is A Negotiated, Best Value Procurement. The Contractor Is To Provide All Management, Supervision, Manpower, Equipment And Supplies Necessary For This Project. The Proposed Contract Is Being Solicited As Full And Open Competition. The Request For Proposal Is Planned To Be Issued In January 2025. In Addition To The Construction Opportunity Reflected Herein, Gsa Is Seeking Suppliers And Manufacturers That Are Interested In Supplying Low Embodied Carbon Asphalt, Concrete (and Cement), Glass And Steel Materials For The Project. Suppliers And Manufacturers Of Materials Meeting Gsa’s Inflation Reduction Act Low Embodied Carbon Asphalt, Concrete (and Cement), Glass And Steel Requirements May Submit An Expression Of Interest To The Contact Below No Later Than March 4, 2025.
expressions Of Interest Should Indicate Materials Available And Global Warming Potential Values Reflected In Materials’ Environmental Product Declarations. Submission Of An Expression Of Interest Grants Gsa Your Permission To Publish Your Firm’s Contact Information And Offerings For Use By Potential Offerors On Gsa Construction Requirements. Supplier And Manufacturer Contact Information Will Be Published In An Informational Amendment Issued By Gsa And, Potentially, In Other Fora.
by Participating In The Competition, Offerors Consent To Unrestricted Gsa Use Of Supplier Names And The Gwp Values Associated With Supplier Materials. Such Information May Be Disclosed Publicly Or Used To Inform Other Low Embodied Carbon Procurement Activities. Technical Solutions, Supplier Pricing, And Supplier-offeror Terms And Conditions Will Not Be Shared. Any Objection Shall Be Transmitted To The Contracting Officer By The Due Date For Offers And Shall Adhere To 41 C.f.r. § 105-60.601.
market Research Resources For Identifying Qualifying Materials May Include, But Are Not Limited To, Astm International’s Epd Page, Building Transparency’s Embodied Carbon In Construction Calculator (ec3), Icc Evaluation Service’s Epd Directory, Epd International Ab’s Epd Library, The National Asphalt Paving Association’s Emerald Eco-label Epd Tool, The National Ready Mixed Concrete Association’s Concrete Epds Page, Nsf's Search For Epds Tool, And Ul’s Spot Product Catalog.
note: The Information Provided Herein Is For Informational Purposes Only And Does Not Indicate Or Imply Federal Endorsement Of Any Organization, Business, Material Or Product. The Government Makes No Representation Or Warranty Concerning The Quality, Performance, Availability Or Suitability Of Any Organization, Business, Material Or Product
Closing Date5 Mar 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
Rural Development Department - RDD Tender
Services
Manpower Supply
GEM
Corrigendum : Closing Date Modified
India
Description: CATEGORY: Manpower Outsourcing Services - Fixed Remuneration -
ADDIONAL PROGRAM OFFICER; ADDIONAL PROGRAM
OFFICER; Post Graduate , Manpower Outsourcing Services -
Fixed Remuneration - TECHNICAL ASSISTANT; TECHNICAL
ASSISTANT; Diploma , Manpower Outsourcing Services -
Fixed Remuneration - DATA ENTRYOPERATOR; DATA ENTRY
OPERATOR; Diploma , Manpower Outsourcing Services -
Fixed Remuneration - ACCOUNT ASSISTANT; ACCOUNT
ASSISTANT; Graduate
Closing Date23 Jul 2025
Tender AmountINR 11 Million (USD 128.3 K)
Authority Of The Freeport Area Of Bataan Tender
Others...+2Civil And Construction, Civil Works Others
Corrigendum : Tender Amount Updated
Philippines
Description: Service Contract Of Manpower, Tools And Equipment For The Collection, Hauling Of Residual Solid Waste From Freeport Area Of Bataan (fab) Locators, Facilities, Parks And Road Networks To The Fab Transf , Services ,authority Of The Freeport Area Of Bataan
Closing Date18 Feb 2025
Tender AmountPHP 20.7 Million (USD 354.3 K)
VIVEA Tender
Education And Training Services
France
Details: The Vivea Alsace Territorial Committee wants the implementation of a new training offer aimed at developing the skills of operating managers so that they can consolidate the profitability of their business and their income. The development of agricultural businesses takes place in a changing context whose repercussions can impact their economic balance, their profitability and the income levels of farm managers. Whether the consequences are immediate or in the longer term, the strategic approach and management of companies must make it possible to optimize the production tool by taking into account economic factors (markets, consumption, distribution circuits), environmental factors. (Climate Change, Access to Resources, Impacts of Agricultural Practices), Social (Societal Expectations, Labor Force and Employment Management) and Political (Common Agricultural Policy, National Sector Plans, etc.). Market developments (soybeans for example) can call into question the economics of a company, requiring anticipation of a change in the supply chain, possible investments in skills, equipment and manpower. Such developments in existing systems require good control of production factors and knowledge of balance points.
Closing Soon31 Jan 2025
Tender AmountRefer Documents
BARAGAY SANDAYONG SUR DANAO CITY CEBU Tender
Civil And Construction...+1Road Construction
Corrigendum : Tender Amount Updated
Philippines
Details: Description Description Republic Of The Philippines Danao City Brgy. Sandayong Sur Invitation To Apply For Eligibility And To Bid Concreting Of Barangay Road At Sandayong Sur, Danao City The Brgy.sandayong Sur, Tends To Apply The Sum Of Php991,048.00 Being Approved Budget For The Contract (abc) To Payments Under The Contract For Concreting Of Barangay Road @ Brgy.sandayong Sur, Danao City. Bids Received In Excess Of The Abc Shall Be Automatically Rejected At The Bid Opening. The Barangay Sandayong Sur Now Invites Sealed Bids From Eligible Bidder To Participate In The Public Bidding For Concreting Of Barangay Road Of Brgy.sandayong Sur, Danao City As Follows; Seq. Qty. Item Description Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Cost 1. 96 Cu.m Base Course(gravel)- Compacted 2,100.00 201,600.00 2. 1296 Bags Portland Cement 228.00 295,488.00 3. 72 Cu.m Washed Sand 2,100.00 151,200.00 4. 144 Cu.m Crushed Gravel 2,100.00 302,400.00 5. 46 Lengths 12mm X 6.00mtrs. Deformed Bar 318.00 14,628.00 6. 49 Kgs. Asphalt Sealant (bitumen Seal) 268.00 13,132.00 7. 81 Lengths 1 X 6 X 10 Coco Lumber 150.00 12,150.00 8. 3 Kgs. 4 Common Wire Nails 81.00 243.00 9. 3 Pcs. Hacksaw Blade 69.00 207.00 Php. 991,048. 00 Delivery Of The Goods Is Required Not Later Than Febuary 29, 20245.the Description Of An Eligible Bidders Is One Who Have Submitted The Following Requirements: Eligibilty Requirements To Be Submitted On January 30- Febuary 6, 2025 At 2:00 P.m. (note: All These Documents Should Be In A Separate Envelope.) 1. Dti Business Name Registration Or Sc Registration 2. Tax Clearance 3. Business Permit 4. Tax Identification Number 5. Authority Of The Signatory Duly Notarized If (single Proprietorship) / Secretary Certificate If Corp. 6. Omnibus Sworn Statement Duly Notarized 7. Valid Joint Venture Agreement 8. Articles Of Partnership Or Incorporation 9. On-going And Awarded Contracts 10. Completed Similar Contracts 11. Copies Of End-user’s Acceptance Letters For Completed Contracts 12. Specification Of Whether Or Not The Prospective Bidder Is A Manufacturer, Supplier, Or Distributor Duly Notarized 13. Audited Financial Statement. 14. Nfcc Duly Notarized Or Credit Line At Least 10% Of The Abc 15. Geps Registration Submission And Receipts Of Bids On Febuary 06, 2025 At 1:30 O’clock In The Afternoon At The Bids And Awards Committee Office At Brgy. Sandayong Sur, Danao City. Technical Envelope: 1. Bid Security -2% Cash/ Cashier’s Check/manager’s Check/letter Of Credit/bank Draft/guarantee (based On Abc)5% Gsis Bond (based On The Abc)/bid Securing Declaration 2. Authority Of The Signatory Duly Notarized If (single Proprietorship) / Secretary Certificate If Corp. 3. Production / Delivery Schedule 4. Manpower Requirements 5. After-sales/parts,if Applicable. 6. Technical Specification Of The Products 7. Commitment To Extend A Credit Line / Nfcc At Least 10% Of The Abc Duly Notarized. 8. Omnibus Sworn Statement Duly Notarized Financial Envelope: 1. Bid Prices In The Bill Of Quantities In The Prescribed Bid Form. 2. The Recurring And The Maintenance Costs,if Applicable. Instructions To Bidders: 1.) For Winning Bidders,performance Security Shall Be Required To Guarantee The Faithful Performance Upon Signing The Contracts It Maybe 5% Of The Contract Prices On A Form Of Cash/manager’s Check Or 30% Gsis Bond. 2.) Retention In The Amount Equivalent To At Least 10% Of Every Progress Payment Made Or Special Bank Guarantee Equivalent To At Least 10% Of The Total Contract Price.the Said Amount Shall Be Released Only After The Lapse Of The Warranty Period,3 ,months In Case Of Supplies And 1year In The Case Of Purchase Of Equipment. 3.) All Particulars Relative To Pre-qualifications,biddings,evaluation Of Bids And Awards Of Contracts Shall Be Governed By The Provision Of Ra 9184 And Other Rules Regulation As Maybe Applicable. 4.) The City Government Reserves The Right To Reject Any/or All Bids, To Waive Any Defect,informalities Therein And To Award To The Bidders Upon Evaluation By The Bids And Awards Committee (bac) The Bid That Are More Advantageous To The City. 5.)5% Value Added Tax (vat) Withheld Of The Contract Price.1% Creditable Income Tax Of Contract Price. 6.) Bidders Should Fill-up All Items; Otherwise In Case Their Quotation Is Incomplete They Are Automatically Disqualified. Bidding Will Be Conducted Through Open Competitive Bidding Procedures Using As Specified In The Implementing Rules And Regulations Part! (irr-a) Of Republic Act No. 9184 (r.a. 9184), Otherwise Known As The Government Procurement Reform Act, And Is Restricted To Organization With At Least Sixty Percent (60%)interest Or Outstanding Capital Stock Belongings To Citizen Of The Philippines, As Specified In Republic Act 5183 (r.a.5183).only Bids From Bidders Who Pass The Eligibility Check Will Be Opened.the Process For The Eligibility Check Is Described In Section Ll Of The Bidding Documents, Itb. The Bidder With The Lowest Calculated Bid (lcb) Shall Advance To The Post-qualification Stage In Order To Finally Determine Whos Responsiveness To The Technical And Financial Requirements Of The Project. The Contract Shall Then Be Awarded To The Lowest Calculated And Responsive Bidder (lcrb) Who Was Determined As Such During The Post-qualification Procedure. Very Truly Yours, Nelia J. Cañas Brgy.bac Chairman Sandayong Sur, Danao City
Closing Soon6 Feb 2025
Tender AmountPHP 991 K (USD 16.8 K)
MUNICIPALITY OF TINGLAYAN Tender
Corrigendum : Tender Amount Updated
Philippines
Description: Continuation Of The Construction Of Manpower Development Center , Construction Projects ,municipality Of Tinglayan, Kalinga
Closing Date24 Feb 2025
Tender AmountPHP 1.1 Million (USD 19.2 K)
2231-2240 of 2248 active Tenders