Fire Tenders

Details: The property at Brandenburgische Strasse 100 in Ludwigsfelde has 2 building sections. The building is used as a 2-stream vocational school with preparation and classrooms, administration and office rooms, a serving kitchen with dining room, and storage rooms. The main building, which faces the street on its gable side, and the side wing angled at right angles to it, were built around 1950. The main building has a full basement and 2 floors above ground and an attic. The side wing has a partial basement and 1 floor above ground and an attic. The building sections were built as a masonry structure with steel stone and reinforced concrete ceilings, a wooden roof structure with concrete roof tiles. The roof structure consists of nailed lattice rafter trusses on the eaves sill and ridge purlin. The hipped areas were built as a purlin roof structure with rafters. The interior and sanitary facilities were renovated in the early 1990s. In this context, the roof covering (clay tiles) was also renewed. The current planning includes the renovation and the fire protection upgrade of the buildings. The roof structure and roof covering are being renewed outside. The windows and facade are being revised. Inside, fire protection renovations are being carried out with regard to the hallway partitions and necessary room closures. The main building is approx. 75.00 x 13.50 m and the side wing approx. 35.00 x 12.50 m

Details: Synopsis: Request For Architectural And Engineer Sf330 Submission. solicitation: 36c2552r00031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: this Ae Services Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act (public Law 0582) And Implemented In Accordance With The Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36. Firms Will Be Selected Based On Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Required Work Per The Evaluation Factors Listed Below. this Procurement Is Restricted To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms. This Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Vaam 836.6 Implemented In Far Subpart 36.6. this Is Not A Request For Proposal (rfp) And An Award Will Not Be Made With This Announcement. This Announcement Is A Request For Sf330 S From Qualified Contractors Who Meet The Professional Requirements Listed Herein. the Selection Criteria For This Acquisition Will Be In Accordance With Far 36 And Are Listed Below In Descending Order Of Importance. The Government Will Not Pay Nor Reimburse Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. The Contract Is Anticipated To Be Awarded By March 31, 2025. award Of Any Resultant Contract Is Contingent Upon The Availability Of Funds. no Solicitation Document Is Available And No Other Information Pertaining To Project Scope Is Available. Any Request For Assistance With Submission Or Other Procedural Matters Shall Be Submitted Via Email Only To Kevin.mahoney3@va.gov Personal Visits To Discuss This Announcement Will Not Be Allowed. the Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541310 Architect Services With A Small Business Size Standard Of $12.5 Million. Award Of A Firm Fixed Price Contract Is Anticipated. Anticipated Time For Completion Of Design Is Approximately 180 Calendar Days After The Notice To Proceed Has Been Issued Including Time For Va Reviews. The Ae Firm Shall Also Be Required To Perform Construction Period Services If Award Of A Construction Project Contract Is Made. database Registration Information: verification Of Status Of The Offeror Shall Be Accomplished Before Review Of Sf 330. This Acquisition Is 100% Set-aside For Qualified Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business. Only Architect-engineer Businesses Inc Compliance With Vaar 852.219-10 Are Eligible. Only A/e Firms Verified And Listed In The Sba Vendor Information Pages Database, (veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov), Shall Be Considered. Firms Not Verified At The Time Of Receipt Of The Sf 330 In The Sba Veteran Small Business Certification Program Shall Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. system For Award Management (sam): federal Acquisition Registrations Require That Federal Contractors Register In The System For Award Management (sam) Database At Https://sam.gov/content/ And Enter All Mandatory Information Into The System. Award Cannot Be Made Until The Contractor Has Registered. Offerors Shall Be Actively Registered In Sam Prior To Submitting Their Qualifications Package. Any Firm Not Actively Registered In Sam By The Date Of Receipt Of The Sf 330 Shall Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. the Excluded Parties List System (epls): to Ensure That The Individuals Providing Services Under The Contract Have Not Engaged In Fraud Or Abuse Regarding Sections 1128 And1128a Of The Social Security Act Regarding Federal Health Care Programs, The Contractor Is Required To Check The Excluded Parties List System (epls) Located At Https://sam.gov/content/ For Each Person Providing Services Under This Contract. Further The Contractor Is Required To Certify That All Persons Listed In The Qualifications Package Have Been Compared Against The Epls List And Are Not Listed. During The Performance Of This Contract The Contractor Is Prohibited From Using Any Individual Or Business Listed On The List Of Excluded Individuals/entities. e-verify System: companies Awarded A Contract With The Federal Government Shall Be Required To Enroll In E-verify Within 30 Days Of The Contract Award Date. They Shall Also Need To Begin Using The E-verify System To Confirm That All Of Their New Hires And Their Employees Directly Working On Federal Contracts Are Authorized To Legally Work In The United States. E-verify Is An Internet-based System That Allows An Employer, Using Information Reported On An Employee's Form I-9, To Determine The Eligibility Of That Employee To Work In The United States. There Is No Charge To Employers To Use E-verify. (far 52.222-54) a-e Firms Are Required To Respond If Interested By Submitting One (1) Completed Standard Form 330 Qualification Package Parts I And Ii To Include All Consultants (form Available On-line At: Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116486. Must Include In Part I Section H An Organizational Chart Of The Firm (excludes Consultants), And Information Pertaining To A Design Quality Management Plan. Submission Information Incorporated By Reference Shall Not Be Considered. All Submissions Shall Be Made Electronically. Packages Which Are Hand Delivered Or Delivered Via Surface Mail Or Any Other Method Other Than Electronically Shall Not Be Reviewed. completed Package Shall Be Delivered Electronically On Or Before January 31, 2025 At 2:00pm Central Time To: Kevin.mahoney3@va.gov Hard Copies Shall Not Be Accepted. The Email Subject Line Shall Clearly Identify The Sf330 Request Number: 36c25525r0031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: the Size Of The Pdf Document Must Be Below 10 Mg Or The Va Email Will Error Out And Reject The Application. It Is The Contractor S Responsibility To Ensure That The Application Is Received. Only One Email Will Be Accepted From Each Firm (contractor). evaluation Factors: selection Criteria Are In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 36.602-1 And Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 836.602-1. Prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages Using Additional Pages As Necessary. Sf 330 Submissions Including Any Additional Pages Are Not To Exceed Fifty (50) Pages Exclusive Of Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Each Side Of A Piece Of Paper Is One Page (i.e., Two Pages To A Single Sheet Of Paper). Blank Pages Are Not Included In The Count. sf330 Submission Packages Which Exceed 50 Pages Will Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. The Only Exclusions To The 50-page Limit As Listed In The Request For Sf330 Are: Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Title Page Shall Not Exceed More Than One (1) Page. Table Of Contents Shall Only Contain The Information Necessary To Define The Contents Of The Document. Divider Pages May Contain A Maximum Of One (1) Line Of Description. Responses Must Reference 36c25525r0031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages And The Information Contained Herein. qualifications (sf330) Submitted By Each Firm For 36c25525r0031 And Project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Will Be Reviewed And Evaluated Based On The Following Evaluation Criteria Listed Below: evaluation Factors For Sf330 Review Submitted For project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Selection Criteria Are In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 36.602-1 And Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 836.602-1. Prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages Using Additional Pages As Necessary. Sf 330 Submissions Including Any Additional Pages Are Not To Exceed Fifty (50) Pages Exclusive Of Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Each Side Of A Piece Of Paper Is One Page (i.e., Two Pages To A Single Sheet Of Paper). Blank Pages Are Not Included In The Count. sf330 Submission Packages Which Exceed 50 Pages Will Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. The Only Exclusions To The 50-page Limit As Listed In The Request For Sf330 Are: Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Title Page Shall Not Exceed More Than One (1) Page. Table Of Contents Shall Only Contain The Information Necessary To Define The Contents Of The Document. Divider Pages May Contain A Maximum Of One (1) Line Of Description. Responses Must Reference 36c25525r0031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages And The Information Contained Herein. qualifications (sf330) Submitted By Each Firm For 36c25525r0031 And Project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Will Be Reviewed And Evaluated Based On The Following Evaluation Criteria Listed Below: evaluation Factors For Sf330 Review Submitted For project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces professional Qualifications: The Qualifications Of The Individuals Which Will Be Used For These Services Will Be Examined For Experience And Education And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. Ae Firms Shall Have Professional Architects, Engineers, And Consultants Who Are Licensed In The United States Of America. Current And Valid License Information Must Be Provided. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, And Experience Relevant To A Project Of This Size And Scope) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project. key Positions And Disciplines For This Project Which Will Be Evaluated Include, But Are Not Limited To: architect/designer interior Design electrical Engineer project Manager plumbing Engineer mechanical Engineer fire Protection Engineer quality Assurance industrial Hygienist cost Estimator a/e Firms Are Required To Develop Their Own Team Based Upon Their Understanding Of The Project Requirements And Not Solely Upon The Previous List. specialized Experience And Technical Competence: A/e Firms Must Have Specific Design Experience And Technical Skill In The Type And Scope Of Work Required For Renovations And New Construction At Existing Medical Facilities, Including, Where Appropriate, Renovating Space For Patient Privacy And Rehabilitation Services, Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials. Experience And Qualifications Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. Ae Firms With Demonstrated Experience Of Higher Numbers Of Team Members Who Are Key Personnel Working Together On Past Projects Will Receive A Higher Score Than Those That Do Not Demonstrated Experience Of Higher Numbers Of Team Members Who Are Key Personnel Working Together On Past Projects. submissions Shall Include No More And No Less Than One (1) And No More Than Three (3) Recent And Relevant Government And Private Experience Projects Similar In Size Scope And Complexity, And Experience With The Type Of Projects/competence Above That Were Completed By The Ae Firm Submitting The 330 S. Relevant Is Defined As Those Task Requirements Identified In The Project Description. Recent Is Defined As Design And Construction Period For Projects That Are Both Design And Construction Complete Within The Past 5 (five) Years. Each Project Shall Include The Following: project Title, Contract Number, Location And Detailed Narrative Describing The Scope Of Services Provided Including The Type Of Work Performed By The Offeror And Its Role In The Project I.e., Prime Contract, Teaming Partner, Or Subcontractor. project Owner, Owner S Point Of Contact Including Telephone Number And Email Address. services & Deliverables Provided Under The Contract/task Order. period Of Performance, Including Start And Completion Dates. total Dollar Value Of The Project For Both The Award Cost And Final (completed) Cost. federal, State, Or Private Enterprise Contract? the Evaluation Will Also Consider Narratives Addressing The Following Topics In Section H. Simply Re-stating This List In Section H Will Not Be Sufficient. The Narrative Of How The Firm Addresses Each Of These Will Be Evaluated. the Management Approaches. the Coordination Of Disciplines And Subcontractors quality Control Procedures, And familiarity With Va Design Guides/manuals, Master Specifications, And Other Applicable Federal, State, And Local Standards. capacity: The Prime Contractor Will Be Evaluated To Determine If It Has The General Workload And Staffing Capacity Within Its Design Office Which Will Be Responsible For The Design To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time.â  In Accordance With Vaar 852.219-75:  in The Case Of A Contract For Services (except Construction), The Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To It To Firms That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs As Set Forth In 852.219-73.  any Work That A Similarly Situated Vip-listed Subcontractor Further Subcontracts Will Count Towards The 50% Subcontract Amount That Cannot Be Exceeded.   Prime Contractor Must Include Its Certification Of Compliance With The Limitations On Subcontracting Specified In 852.219-75 With Its 330 Submissions. past Performance: Provide Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Project Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. Information Presented Must Clearly Demonstrate The Construction Cost Limit, A/e Created Cost Estimate, And Final Awarded Cost Of The Project. past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Database Will Be Reviewed To Evaluate The Projects That Have A Cpars Entry. Cpars Are Not Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330 Submission. The Contract Number For The Project Must Be Submitted With Each Project In Section F So Cpars Can Be Reviewed In The Database. for Any Project That Does Not Have Cpars Data Available, A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) May Be Submitted With The Sf330. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. If A Firm Does Not Receive A Requested Complete Ppq From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title/contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. evaluations May Also Include Additional Performance Related From The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. evaluations Will Consider Ratings On Projects Which Are Design And Construction Complete In The Last Three (3) Years, Information Regarding Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. All Projects Provided In The Sf 330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. If Appropriate, The Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services May Be Evaluated. location Of Design Firm: Per Far 36.602-1 Selection Criteria: Market Research Indicates That At Least 3 Qualified Firms Exist Within A 500-mile Radius Of The Wichita Va Medical Center Located At 5500 E. Kellogg, Wichita, Kansas 67218. This Procurement Is Restricted To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms Located Within A 500-mile Radius Of The Robert J. Dole Veterans Affairs Medical Center (vamc) In Wichita, Kansas. Architectural Prime Contractors Whose Primary (i.e., Headquarters, Primary Corporate Office, Main Office) Physical Business Address Is Within A 500-mile Radius From The Wichita Va Medical Center Located At 5500 E. Kellogg, Wichita Kansas 67218 And Resides Within The Borders Of The United States Of America Will Receive A Higher Score On Evaluations. architectural Prime Contractors Whose Primary Physical Business Address Is Outside A 500-mile Radius From The Wichita Va Medical Center Located At 5500 E. Kellogg, Wichita Kansas 67218 And Resides Within The Borders Of The United States Of America Will Receive A Lesser Score On Evaluations. architectural Prime Contractors Are Required To Verify The Primary Physical Business Address (described Above) As Part Of The Sf330 Response. If The Information Cannot Be Verified As Required, The Sf330 Will Be Found To Be Nonresponsive And Will Not Receive Further Consideration. sf 330 Submissions From Companies Located Outside The Borders Of The United States Of America Shall Not Be Considered. claims And Terminations: Any Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Or Terminated Contracts Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services Will Be Examined.

Purchaser Name: Presidency Of The Provincial Consortium For The Provision Of The Prevention, Fire Extinction And Rescue | Concreting in Calle Del Cuervo

Details: ****amended To Say: Responses Due By 28 January 2025, See Revised 36c25725r0010****** presolicitation Notice Presolicitation Notice Request For Sf330 - Project 549a4-23-600, Design Project To Construct A New Central Plant To Replace The Original Building #11 Boiler Plant (1978) And Joined Chiller Plant (1987) Located At The Sam Rayburn Memorial Veterans Center (srmvc), Va North Texas Health Care System, 1201 E. 9th St., Bonham, Texas 75418. this Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualifications Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder/plan Holder List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse, Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. 1. General Information: The Veterans Health Administration (vha) Network Contract Office 17 (nco17) Is Seeking Sources And Intends To Award A Firm-fixed Price Design Contract For Architect-engineering (a-e) Services For Project 549a4-23-600, Design Project To Construct A New Central Plant To Replace The Original Building #11 Boiler Plant (1978) And Joined Chiller Plant (1987) Located At The Sam Rayburn Memorial Veterans Center (srmvc), Va North Texas Health Care System, 1201 E. 9th St., Bonham, Texas 75418. The A/e Shall Provide Investigative And Feasibility Design Services, Schematic Design Drawings, Design Development Drawings, Construction Documents, Final Bid Documents, Specifications, Calculations, Cost Estimates, Narratives, Bidding Support Services, Solicitation Support Services, And Construction Period Services For All Facets Of Work And Disciplines/trades To Facilitate The Construction Of The Central Plant At The Srmvc. The A-e Services Contract That Is Anticipated To Be Awarded Will Be Procured In Accordance With The Selection Of Architects And Engineers Statute [formerly Known As The Brooks Architect Engineer Act], Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 36.6 Architectural And Engineering Services, Va Acquisition Regulation 836.6, And Va Acquisition Manual M836.6 Architect-engineer Services. In Accordance With Far 36.209, Construction Contracts With Architect-engineer Firms, No Contract For The Construction Of A Project Shall Be Awarded To The Firm That Designed The Project Or Its Subsidiaries Or Affiliates, Except With The Approval Of The Head Of The Agency Or Authorized Representative. 2. Project Information This Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541310 Architect Services And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $12.5m. A Full Design Team Is Required To Complete This Project. The Projected Award Date For The Anticipated A-e Contract Is On Or Before Early June 2025. 3. Scope Of Design See Attached Statement Of Work 4. A-e Selection Process: Firms Submitting Sf330s In Response To This Announcement, Not Later Than The Closing Date And Time Specified Herein And In Accordance With Submission Requirements, Will Be Considered For Evaluation. Sf330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Selection Criteria Listed Below To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms For This Requirement. The Government Will Notify And Conduct Discussions With A Minimum Of Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms. All Firms Not Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified At This Time. Discussions May Be Held With The Most Highly Qualified Firms In The Form Determined To Be Most Advantageous And Economical By The Contracting Officer. The Form Of Discussions Will Be The Same For All Firms. For This Procurement, The Discussions Will Be Conducted Via Written Response. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Email And Provided Further Instructions, To Include Any Questions Or Topics To Address. Following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated, Rated, And Ranked Based On The Selection Criteria For The Written Response. The Highest Rated Firm Will Be Selected, And The Solicitation Will Subsequently Be Issued. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Information Obtained Via Discussions For Each Firm. The Solicitation Will Be Issued To The Highest Rated Firm As A Request For Fee Proposal (rfp). A Site Visit Will Be Authorized For The Highest Rated Firm During The Negotiation Process. An Award Will Then Be Made As Long As The Negotiation Of Rates And Hours Leads To A Determination Of A Fair And Reasonable Final Contract Price. If Negotiations With The Highest Rated Firm Are Unsuccessful, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until Award Can Be Made. 5. Sf330 Selection Criteria: The Following Are Listed In Descending Order Of Importance: Primary Selection Criteria: Professional Qualifications (sections C Through E): Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service. The Design Firm And A-e On Staff Representing The Project Or Signing Drawings In Each Discipline Must Be Licensed To Practice In Any One Of The United States Of America. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five (5) Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm As Full-time Employees) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project, And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team When Evaluating Professional Qualifications. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. A Resume For Each Of These Key Positions Must Be Provided Identifying Their Specific Role, Via Section E In The Sf330. Key Positions And Disciplines Required For This Project Include, But Are Not Limited, To: Principal-in-charge Overall Project Manager. Architect Design Civil Design Structural Design Mechanical Design Electrical Design Plumbing Design Fire Protection Engineer (texas Licensed) Physical Security Specialist. Quality Assurance/quality (qa/qc) Control Manager Estimating Specifications Interior Design Other Offer Must Include The Following Statement Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Sdvosb Compliance When Submitting The Personnel Proposed To Perform The Work Under This Requirement: I [signatory Authority]______________________, [company] __________________, Certify That The Sdvosb Prime Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To The Prime For Contract Performance To Firms That Are Not Certified Sdvosbs By The Small Business Association S Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) In Compliance Of Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) 852.219-75. The Information Provided In Sections C Through E Of Sf 330 Will Be Used To Evaluate This Evaluation Factor. Do Not Include This Information In Section H, Unless It Is Pertinent To Support The Information Listed In The Other Sections. Specialized Experience And Technical Competence (sections F, G, And H): A/e Must Use Engineering Professionals With Proven Experience With Energy Center Designs Greater Than $20,000,000 Dollars On Va Facilities. Section G Will Used To Evaluate The Prior Experience Of The Prime Firm And Any Key Subcontractors Working Together On The Provided Relevant Projects. The Evaluation Will Also Consider Narratives Addressing The Following Topics In Section H. Simply Re-stating This List In Section H Will Not Be Sufficient. The Narrative Of How The Firm Addresses Each Of These Will Be Evaluated. The Management Approach The Coordination Of Disciplines And Subcontractors Quality Control Procedures, And Familiarity With Va Design Guides/manuals, Master Specifications And Other Applicable Standards. Capacity (section H): The Evaluation Will Consider The Firm S Ability To Meet The Schedule Of The Overall Project, As Well As The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Re-quired Time. Provide The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines By Providing Current Project Workload, Inclusive Of All Projects Awarded By The Va During The Previous Twelve (12) Months And The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Con-tracts. Offeror Shall Clearly State Their Available Capacity Presenting Workload Percent-ages For The Key Disciplines And/or Team Members. Also, The Offeror Must Provide The Completion Percentages And Expected Completion Date For The Va Projects Awarded In The Previous Twelve (12) Months. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Please Ensure The Capacity Applies Toward The Team/personnel Provided In The Sf 330. Past Performance (section H): Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. Past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Database Will Be Reviewed To Evaluate The Projects That Have A Cpars Entry. Cpars Are Not Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330 Submission. The Contract Number For The Project Must Be Submitted With Each Project In Section F So Cpars Can Be Reviewed In The Database. Please Note We Are Unable To Review Any Cpars From Other Federal Agencies, Outside Of The Va. For Any Project That Does Not Have Cpars Data Available, A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Is Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. In The Event That A Firm Does Not Receive A Requested Complete Ppq From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title/contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. Evaluations May Also Include Additional Performance Related From The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. Evaluations Will Consider Superior Performance Ratings On Recently Completed Va Projects As Well As The Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. If Appropriate, The Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services May Be Evaluated. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. All Projects Provided In The Sf 330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. For Ppqs, Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document. Completed Ppqs Should Be Incorporated Into The Sf 330 Directly. Ppqs Should Not Be Submitted To The Vha Pcac Directly. Any Ppqs Will Not Be Counted Towards The Page Limitations For This Submission. However, Any Narratives Provided For Past Performance In Section H Will Be Counted Toward The Page Limit. Knowledge Of Locality (section H): To Include Specific Knowledge Of Certain Local Conditions Or Project Site Features, Such As Geological Features, Climatic Conditions, Working With And Local Construction Methods Or Local Laws And Regulations. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Note That The Intent Of This Factor Is To Showcase A Firm S Understanding Of The Site And Locality, And Not Where The Firm Is Located And How They Would Travel To The Site. Information Related To The Firm S Location, Shall Be Provided In Section H, Under Secondary Selection Criteria Factor 1. Experience In Construction Period Services (section H): Experience In Construction Period Services Must Be Demonstrated Via Project Experience. These May Be The Same Projects Identified Above In Factor 1; However, The Firm Shall Clearly Delineate The Types Of Construction Period Services Performed For Each. Project Descriptions Must Include Experience With: Solicitation Support Services, Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Cost Estimates, Attendance At Weekly Conference Calls, Providing Minutes Of Meetings Between The Ae, Va, And Contractors, Pre-final Inspection Site Visits, Generation Of Punch-list Reports, Coordination With Commissioning Requirements And Production Of As-built Documentation. In Addition, The Firm Must Include Experience Addressing Unforeseen Conditions And Emergent Situations, Conducting Situation Evaluations And Make Midcourse Corrections. Include Description On How The Firm Can Be Proactive Or Responsive In These Situations. The Firm Shall Provide A Detailed Description Of Projects Worked That Illustrate Experience In These Ten Areas. Projects Must Be Within The Last Ten (10) Years. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. Secondary Selection Criteria: Geographic Location - Location Of The Firm, As Measured By The Driving Distance (miles) Between The Offeror S Principal Business Location And: Sam Rayburn Memorial Veteran Center 1201 E. 9th Street Bonham, Texas 75418. Determination Of The Mileage Will Be Based On Google Maps (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/). The Secondary Selection Criterion Is Used As A Tiebreaker, If Necessary, In Ranking The Most Highly Qualified Firms Following The Completion Of The Sf330 Evaluations. The Secondary Selection Criterion Will Not Be Applied When Determining A Firm S Sf330 Submission Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Or Unacceptable. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf330. 6. Discussions/written Response Selection Criteria: In Accordance With Far 36.602-3(c), Discussions Will Be Conducted In The Form Of A Written Response To Questions Developed By The Teb. The Selected Firms Will Be Invited To Respond To Written Questions Related To Criteria In The Sf330s. The Instructions For The Written Responses Will Be Provided To The Selected Firms Only. Each Selected Firm Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Responses To The Questions Asked. The Highest-ranked Firm Will Be Selected Based On Their Written Response. The Previous Sf330 Evaluations Are Not Applicable During The Written Response Phase Of The Selection Process. 7. Submission Criteria/requirements: The Below Information Contains The Instructions And Format That Shall Be Followed For The Submission Of The Sf 330, Statement Of Qualifications: Submission Contents Firms Are Required To Submit Two Documents: One Sf330, Architect/engineer Qualifications, And Any Attachments As A Pdf On The Sf330 Form (form Is Available On-line At Http://www.cfm.va.gov/contract/ae.asp). One Separate Document Containing The Following Information: Cage Code; Unique Entity Identifier (uei); Tax Id Number; E-mail Address(es) And Phone Number(s) Of The Primary Point(s) Of Contact; Address Of Firm For Correspondence; A Copy Of The Firm S Vetcert/vendor Information Pages Registration And Verification Format Of Submissions The Page Limitation Of The Sf330 Pdf Submission Shall Not Exceed A Total Of 35 Pages. This Includes Cover Letters, Title Pages, Section Divider Pages, Table Of Contents, Etc. Every Page In The Pdf Will Count Toward This Page Limit Except The Cpars Reports/ppqs And Part Ii Of The Sf330. Each Page Shall Be In In Times New Roman Font, Size 12, Single Spaced, On 8.5 X11 Paper With 1 Margins On All Sides. Any Pages In Excess Of The 35 Pages That Are Not Exempt Will Be Removed And Will Not Be Evaluated. Submit One (1) Sf 330, Statement Of Qualifications And Any Attachments, And One (1) Accompanying Document Containing The Above Sdvosb Information, Via Email To The Contracting Officer Rhonda.richardson5@va.gov. The Subject Line Of The Email Shall Read: Sf330 Submission; 36c77625r0010 Construct Bonham Energy Center, Design Project No: 549a4-23-600, Bonham, Tx The Sf 330 Pdf Shall Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size Shall Be No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Not Be Evaluated. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf 330 Submission Package. Technical Questions: All Questions Shall Be Submitted To Rhonda.richardson5@va.gov With The Subject Line Sf330 Question - 36c77625r0010 Construct Bonham Energy Center, Design Project No: 549a4-23-600, Bonham, Tx the Cutoff For Question Submission Is 2:00 Pm Ct On January 7, 2025. Questions Will Be Answered Through Amendment To The Pre-solicitation Notice Posted To Contracting Opportunities At Sam.gov. Submission Due Dates All Responses Are Due Via Email On Or Before January 28, 2025, At 10:00 Am Cst. Note: Sf 330 Submissions Received After The Date And Time Specified Will Not Be Considered. Late Proposal Rules Per Far 15.208 Will Be Followed For Late Submittals. All Emails Must Be Received By The Va Email Server By 10:00 Am Cst. The Time Will Not Be Based On When Firms Hit Send . Do Not Wait Until The Last Minute To Send Submissions. Errors In Email Address Spelling Or Attempts At Emailing Timely Will Not Recover A Late Submission. Other Information All Prime Firms Must Meet The Naics Code Requirement Specified In This Notice. The Contracting Officer Shall Verify The Naics Code In Vetcert Through The Small Business Administration (sba) And/or The System For Award Management (sam). Failure To Meet The Naics Code Requirement May Result In The Rejection Of The Sf330 Submission. Reminder: This Procurement Is A 100% Set-aside For Sdvosb Concerns. Offers Received From Other Than Sdvosb Concerns Will Not Be Considered. All Sdvosbs Must Be Listed As Verified By The Sba Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert). Offerors Must Be Verified And Visible In The Sba Vetcert Database (veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov)) At Time Of Submission Of Sf330 S, Written Responses, And Time Of Award. Failure To Be Both Visible And Verified At The Time Of Sf330s, Written Responses, And Time Of Award Will Result In The Offeror Being Deemed Unacceptable And Ineligible For Award. Note: As Of January 1, 2023, All Sdvosbs That Were Previously Verified By The Va Center For Verification And Evaluation (cve) Were Automatically Granted Certification By The Sba For The Remainder Of The Firm S Eligibility Period. The Sba Granted A One-time, One-year Extension Of Certification To Current Sdvosbs Verified By The Va As Of The Transfer Date On January 1, 2023. The Additional Year Was Added To The Existing Eligibility Period Of A Current Participant. New Applicants Certified By Sba After January 1, 2023, Received The Standard Three-year Certification Period. The Ndaa 2021 Granted A One-year Grace Period For Self-certified Sdvosbs That Ended January 1, 2024.â During The Grace Period, Self-certified Businesses Had One Year To File An Application For Sdvosb Certification And Could Continue To Rely On Their Self-certification To Compete For Non-va Sdvosb Set-aside Contracts. Self-certified Sdvosbs That Applied Before January 1, 2024, Will Maintain Their Eligibility Through The Expiration Of The Grace Period Until Sba Issues A Final Eligibility Decision. All Joint Ventures Must Be Sba Verified At Time Of Submission And Submit Agreements That Comply With 13cfr 125.15 Prior To Contract Award. It Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Contract Opportunities Website At: Https://www.sam.gov/ For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submission Of Sf 330s. See Attached Document: Sow Construct Bonham Energy Center - Final 11-14-24. End Of Document

Details: The Rheinsberg educational campus is to be expanded and developed as a primary school location through conversion and renovation at Kiefernweg 5. The property was built in 1980-1981 as a prefabricated school (type Erfurt). It has been used continuously as a school up to now. The last facade renovation took place in 1990. There are currently classrooms for the primary school and the day-care center in the building. The work will be carried out during school operations (mostly during the holidays) and in some areas and must be calculated accordingly. For this project, the drywall work must be calculated in this construction lot. This includes, among other things: -demolition of plasterboard walls + tiles, floor and wall -demolition of suspended ceilings -demolition of plasterboard installation shafts -internal insulation -new plasterboard walls -fire protection cladding -acoustics / ceilings -toilet partition walls

Details: The Rheinsberg educational campus is to be expanded and developed as a primary school location through conversion and renovation at Kiefernweg 5. The property was built in 1980-1981 as a prefabricated school (type Erfurt). It has been used continuously as a school up to now. The last facade renovation took place in 1990. There are currently classrooms for the primary school and the day-care center in the building. The work will be carried out during school operations (mostly during the holidays) and in some areas and must be calculated accordingly. For this project, the delivery and assembly work of window and door elements must be calculated in this construction lot. This includes - damp room door elements - aluminum-glass pivoting sash T30 Rd - plastic windows - fire protection door, T30 Rd sheet steel door - suitable locking systems

Details: 2 this Is A Pre-solicitation Notice, This Not A Request For Proposals. This Is A Request For Sf-330 Architect/engineer Qualification Packages Only. all Information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Packages Or Technical Information Will Be Issued In This Phase. the Department Of Veteran Affairs Network 6 Contracting Office Is Seeking Qualified Architect-engineering (ae) Firms To Submit Standard Form 330 (sf 330) Architect/engineering Statement Of Qualifications For Project # 590-25-250 | Campus Streets And Walkways Lighting Improvements | Hampton Va Medical Center Located In Hampton, Virginia. Firms Submitting Qualification Packages Must Be Fully Licensed To Perform Designs As A Registered Professional Ae Firm In The United States To Be Considered For This Opportunity. network Contracting Office (nco) 6 Va Facility Locations Include: hampton Va Medical Center, 100 Emancipation Drive, Hampton, Va., 23667. this Acquisition Is 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb). prospective Contractors Are Cautioned That Proposal Submitted In Response To This Solicitation Must Meet The Criteria Identified By 38cfr, Part 74. The Sdvosb Concern Agrees That In The Performance Of The Contract, The Concern Will Comply With The Limitation On Subcontracting Requirements In Accordance With Vaar Clause 852-219-73 (jan 2023) (deviation), Va Notice Of Total Set-aside For Certified Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses. for A Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) To Be Considered As A Prospective Contractor, The Firm, Including Joint Ventures, Must Be Certified In Vetcert (veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov)) And Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) At Time Of Submission Of Their Qualification And Reporting To Vets -4212 Federal Contractor Reporting In Accordance With Far 52.222-37, Employment Reports On Veterans At Https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212. Failure Of A Prospective Sdvosb To Be Certified By The Veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov) At The Time The Sf 330 Is Submitted Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration. All Joint Ventures Must Be Cve Certified At Time Of Submission And Submit Agreements That Comply With 13cfr 125.15 Prior To Contract Award. contract Overview: A Firm Fixed Price A/e Design Service Contract Is Contemplated For Project # 590-25-250 | Campus Streets And Walkways Lighting Improvements. Iaw Vaar 836.204(f)(2) The Estimated Magnitude Of Construction For This Project Is Between $2,000,000 And $5,000,000. The Estimated/target Design Completion Period Is 390 Calendar Days After Issuance Of Notice To Proceed. The Naics Code For This Acquisition Is 541330, Engineering Services With A Size Standard Of $25.5 Million. project Scope: The Architect/engineer (a/e) Shall Provide Comprehensive Survey Of The Campus Street Signage, Street Lighting, Walkway Lighting, And Wayfinding Systems To Determine Current State And What Improvements Are Needed To Ensure Continued Operations. The Va Anticipates That The Survey Will Recommend Near Wholesale Replacement Of Street Signage, Wayfinding Systems And Major Improvements In Lighting Systems. The Project Request Includes Funding Intended To Address The Most Critical Issues First And Final Scope Will Be Determined By The Survey. selection Criteria: The A/e Source Selection Team Shall Utilize The Following Selection Criteria Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. the Architecture-engineer (ae) Must Demonstrate Its Qualifications With Respect To The Published Evaluation Criteria For All Services. The Department Of Veterans Affairs (va) Shall Evaluate Each Potential Contractor In Terms Of The Following: M - Firm Meets The Selection Criterion. Nm - Does Not Meet The Selection Criterion. the Submitted Sf-330s Will Be Evaluated On The Criteria Below, Listed In Order Of Importance: (1) Professional Qualifications (2) Specialized Experience And Technical Competence (3) Capacity To Accomplish The Work (4) Past Performance (5) Construction Period Services (6) Record Of Significant Claims (7) Set-aside (8) Location selection Criterion 1: Professional Qualifications professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services Showing Recent Experience Of The Project Team With Hospital Lighting/electrical Projects Completed Through Designed Within The Past Five (5) Years. Each Resume Shall Include A Minimum Of Two (2) Lighting/electrical Projects Through Completed Construction. team Member Designer Of Record Positions Required In This Project But Not Limited To: Electrical Engineer, Fire Protection Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Project Manager, And Structural Engineer. evaluation Considerations do The Qualifications Indicate That The Project Team Has Recent Direct Experience On Hospital Lighting/electrical Projects Designing Similar Improvements To Those Proposed At Hampton Vamc? Is The Architect/engineer Providing A Team Where Each Member Has More Than 5 Years Of Experience? What Will Be The Role Of Interns If Used During Design? firm Shall Provide A Table Of A Minimum Of 5 Comparable Lighting/electrical Projects Comparing Their Ige With The Bid/award Amount During Construction. selection Criterion 2: Specialized Experience And Technical Competence the Ae Must Have The Necessary Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required, Specifically Evaluating And Replacing Streets And Walkways Lighting On A Hospital S Campus. provide A Minimum Of Three (3) And No More Than Five (5) Projects That Are At Least 85% Complete Through Construction. Submitted Projects Must Be From Within The Past Five (5) Years And Should Be Projects That Best Illustrate Specialized Experience Of The Proposed Team. Example Projects Shall Note Project S Square Footage. All Projects Provided In The Sf-330 Must Be Completed By The Office, Branch, Regional Office, Or Individual Team Member Proposed To Manage And/or Perform Work Under This Contract. to Enable Verification, Firms Should Include The Unique Entity Id (sam Uei) Number Along With Each Firm S Name In The Sf-330 Part 1, Section F Item 25 Firms From Section C Involved In This Project, Block (1). Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification Number In Block 21. Include An Email Address And Phone Number For The Point Of Contact In Block 23(c). Include In The Project Description, The Contract Period Of Performance, Award Contract Value, Current Contract Value, And Summary Of The Work Performed That Demonstrates Relevance To Specialized Experience As Outlined Above. if The Contractor Served As A Subcontractor On A Project, Indicate The Value Of The Work They Provided Towards The Performance Of The Overall Project. If A Project Was Performed By A Joint Venture, And Not All Joint Venture Partners Are On The Team Proposed For This Contract, The Offeror/team Should Specifically Address The Work Performed By The Joint Venture Partner Offering/teaming On This Contract. Likewise, If The Offeror/team Member Worked As A Subcontractor On A Project, The Description Should Clearly Describe The Work Performed By The Offeror/team Member And The Roles And Responsibilities Of Each On The Project, Rather Than The Work Performed On The Project As A Whole. if The Project Description Does Not Clearly Delineate The Work Performed By The Entity/entities Offering/teaming On This Contract, The Project Could Be Eliminated From Consideration. additionally, Firms Are Required To Submit Information That Will Clearly Demonstrate Specific Experiences And Qualifications Of Proposed Personnel And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. Specifically List Similar Scoped Projects No More Than Five (5) Years Old That Clearly Show Participation. (see Sf330 Part I Section G, But Not Excluding Other Information Provided On The Sf330 And Supporting Documentation.) note: If The Offeror Is A Joint Venture, Information Should Be Submitted As A Joint Venture. However, If There Is No Information For The Joint Venture, Information Should Be Submitted For Each Joint Venture Partner, Not To Exceed A Total Of Five (5) Projects For This Criterion. Projects Shall Be Submitted On The Sf330. For Submittal Purposes, A Task Order On An Idiq Contract Is Considered A Project, As Is A Stand-alone Contract Award. Do Not List An Idiq Contract As An Example Of A Completed Project. Instead, List Relevant Completed Task Orders Or Stand-alone Contract Awards That Fit Within The Definition Above. Examples Of Project Work Submitted That Do Not Conform To This Requirement Will Not Be Evaluated. evaluation Considerations does The Architect/engineer Provide Evidence Of Understanding Of The Project; And Any Unique Architectural/engineering Aspects Associated With The Proposed Project And How To Address Them? selection Criteria 3: Capacity To Accomplish The Work the A/e Must Have The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time For Both The Prime And Sub-consultants. This Factor Evaluates The Ability Of The Firm, Given Their Current Projected Workload (percentage) And The Availability Of Their Key Personnel, To Accomplish The Possible Myriad Of Design Projects In The Required Time. The General Workload And Staffing Capacity Of The Design Office Will Be Evaluated. list Current Projects With A Design Fee Of Greater Than $100,000 Being Designed In The Firms Office. indicate The Firms Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Sub-consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period. describe Experience In Successfully Delivering Projects Per Performance Schedule, Providing Timely Construction Support, And Successfully Completing Multiple Projects With Similar Delivery Dates. volume Of Va Contract Awards In The Last 12 Months. evaluator Consideration: does The Proposed Design Team Have Sufficient Capacity To Work On This Project? has The Firm Demonstrated An Ability To Meet Design Schedules In The Past? has The Firm Demonstrated A Record Of Working Together As A Team? selection Criteria 4: Past Performance offerors Will Be Evaluated On Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules In A Hospital Setting. Provided Past Performance And Experience Shall Include Information In The Past Performance Questionnaires (ppqs) Or Cpars/acass For Criterion 2 Projects. Past Performance May Also Include Other Information Provided By The Firm Such As Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Other Information Available To The Government. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Rated Lower. evaluator Consideration: does The Proposed Architect/engineer Have Past Performance With Ratings Satisfactory And Above While Working On Hospital Projects? does The Architect/engineer Have A Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. are The Evaluations Provided For The Projects Listed In Specialized Experience? project Recency: a Project Will Be Considered Recent Only If Performance Was Completed Within Five (5) Years Of The Date Of Issuance Of This Public Announcement. Ongoing Projects Will Not Be Considered, As An Accurate Performance Record Cannot Exist For Work Not Yet Completed. submission Requirements: submit A Completed And Current (most Recent) Cpars/acass Evaluation For Each Project Submitted Under Criterion 2. If The Project Does Not Have A Completed Cpars/acass Evaluation, The Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Included In This Notice Is Provided For The Offeror Or Its Team Members To Submit To The Client. Please Ensure Correct Phone Numbers And Email Addresses Are Provided For The Client Point Of Contact. Do Not Submit A Ppq When A Completed Cpars/acass Is Available. submit No Less Than Three (3) And No More Than Five (5) Past Performance References For Recent And Relevant Projects Identified On Sf330 Part I Section F. Individual Completed Ppqs Should Be No More Than Five (5) Pages Long And Submitted With Your Sf-330. If The Offeror Is Unable To Obtain A Completed Ppq From A Client For A Project(s) Before The Response Date Set Forth In This Notice, Offerors Should Complete And Submit With Their Responses The First Page Of The Ppq (attachment C), Which Will Provide Contract And Client Information For The Respective Project(s). Offerors May Submit A Ppq From A Previous Special Notice/rfp. It Must Be On The Same Form Included With This Special Notice, And It Must Be Legible. Offerors Should Follow Up With Clients/references To Ensure Timely Submittal Of Questionnaires. if Requested By The Client, Questionnaires May Be Submitted Directly To The Government's Point Of Contact, Network Contracting Office 6, Attn: Shannon Brown Via Email At Shannonmarie.brown@va.gov Prior To The Response Date. Please Also Copy Guy Brooks At Guy.brooks@va.gov. evaluator Consideration: does The Proposed Architect/engineer Have Past Performance With Ratings Satisfactory And Above While Working On Hospital Projects? does The Architect/engineer Have A Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. are The Evaluations Provided For The Projects Listed In Specialized Experience? selection Criteria 5: Construction Period Services offerors Will Be Evaluated On The Quality Of The Construction Period Services Provided. Construction Period Services Include But Are Not Limited To Professional Field Inspections, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes. experience In Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work, And Cost Estimates Shall Be Included As An Evaluation Criterion When Construction Period Services Is Included In The Statement Of Work For A-e Services. provide Up To Three (3) Completed Projects In The Past Five (5) Years That Best Illustrates The Construction Period Services Performed By The Team. Describe Construction Period Services Provided And Whether The Project Was Completed Within Schedule And Budget. Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification, Include Name, Telephone Number, And Email Of The Completed Project Stakeholder. evaluator Consideration: what Evidence Do The Qualifications Provide As To The Architect/engineer S Commitment To Proactive And Consistent Representation During Construction Specifically Answering Rfis, Reviewing Submittals And Periodic Site Visits? selection Criteria 6: Record Of Significant Claims interested A/e Firms Must Share Any Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services. indicate Any Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services Within The Past Five (5) Years. selection Criteria 7: Set-aside the Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service- Disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors. selection Criteria 8: Location tie-breaker: if Evaluations Of Sf330 S Result In The Same Rating, Proximity To The Facility Will Be Used As A Tiebreaker. The Distance Will Be Determined According To Http://maps.google.com/. For Firms That Have Multiple/regional Offices, The Location Of The Primary Project Team Will Be Used To Calculate The Distance And Should Be Provided In The Sf330. If The Location Of The Primary Project Team Is Not Identified, The Location Of The Main Office Will Be Used. indicate The Location (physical Address) Of The Firms Or Teams, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices, Any Sub Consultants Offices, And The Location Of The Primary Project Team. Explain How This Will Be Advantageous To The Government. selection Procedures: this Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act Of 1972, Federal Acquisition Regulation 36.6 (far) And Va Acquisition Regulation 836.6 (vaar) And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) 836.6. Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting A Qualifying Sf 330, Before The Closing Date And Time, Will Be Considered For Initial Selection Evaluation. Following Initial Evaluation Of The Sf330s Received Three Or More Firms That Are Considered The Most Highly Qualified To Provide The Type Of Services Required Will Be Selected For Interviews. Selected Firms Will Be Notified By Telephone Or Email Of Selection And Provided Further Instructions. selection And Evaluation Of Firms Shall Be Made Based On Sf 330 Submissions And Direct Responses To The Selection Criteria Identified Herein. Failure To Address All Selection Criteria Will Result In A Decreased Rating. evaluating Past Performance And Experience May Include Information Provided By The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Contracting Officer Knowledge Of Current Project Performance. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Could Result In A Firm Being Removed From Consideration. If Relevant Cpars Evaluation(s) Are Available, Report(s) Shall Be Submitted With The Completed Sf330 Package. If There Is Not A Completed Cpars Evaluation, The Ppq Included With This Notice Is Provided For The Offeror Or Its Team Members To Submit For Each Project Included In Criterion (2). Official Cpars Evaluation(s) Found In In Government Databases Will Take Precedence. Completed Ppqs Should Be Submitted With Your Sf330. firms That Design Or Prepare Specifications In Conjunction With This Contract Are Prohibited From Participating On Any Future Construction Contracts Based On Those Documents. All Projects Identified On The Sf330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. submission Requirements. the Sf 330 Form May Be Downloaded From Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/sf. Completed Sf 330 S Shall Include The Primary Firms, Subcontractor Firms And Any Consultants Expected To Be Used On The Project. Do Not Submit Information Incorporating By Reference. Prospective Firms Shall Address All Selection Criteria Factors Within Their Submitted Sf330 Packages. the Following Format Should Be Used: cover Page With Solicitation Number, Project Title. table Of Contents. sf 330. acceptability Under Other Appropriate Evaluation Criteria, I.e., Sf 330, Section H. copy Of Current A/e State Engineer/architect License. unique Entity Id (uei). tax Id Number. the E Mail Address And Phone Number Of The Primary Point Of Contact. sf 330 Date Of Receipt/due Date: Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit One (1) Electronic Sf 330 And Attachments (if Any) No Later Than 10:00 Am Est On January 30, 2025. Email Capacity Is Limited To Seven (7) To Ten (10) Megabytes (megs). all Sf330 Submittals And Questions Must Be Sent Electronically To The Attention Of Contract Specialist Shannon Brown, Shannonmarie.brown@va.gov And Guy Brooks, Contracting Officer At Guy.brooks@va.gov. Please Provide Pre-solicitation Number, Project Title, And Firm Name In Subject Line Of Email. When Submitting Sf330s, If More Than One Email Is Sent, Please Number Emails In Subjects As 1 Of N . Submittals Received After The Date And Time Identified On Page One (1) Will Not Be Considered. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Be Negatively Evaluated. the Sf-330 Including Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information Shall Not Exceed A Total Of 50 Pages In A Common Font Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. The Proposal Shall Be Submitted As A Single Application-generated (not Scanned), Searchable Pdf Document. A Page Is Defined As Each Face Of An 8.5 X 11-inch Sheet Of Paper Containing Information. The Page Limitation Does Not Apply To The Licenses, Contract Performance Evaluations, (i.e., Cpars) And Award Documentation. This Information Should Be Provided As Attachments To The Sf 330. all Questions Regarding This Announcement Must Be Emailed To The Contract Specialist Shannon Brown At Shannonmarie.brown@va.gov And Contracting Officer Guy Brooks At Guy.brooks@va.gov site Visits Will Not Be Arranged This Phase. this Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For Architect/engineering (a/e) Design Services; No Solicitation Package Will Be Issued Until After An Evaluation Has Been Made On The Provided Sf-330. Only The A/e Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting An Sf330 Package On Time Will Be Considered For Initial Evaluation. see Attached Documents: attachment 1 Statement Of Work attachment 2 Pre-construction Assessment/ Evaluation attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire

Details: Presolicitation Notice presolicitation Notice presolicitation Notice *=required Field presolicitation Notice this Pre-solicitation Notice Is Not A Request For Proposal. All Information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Are Contained Herein. No Additional Solicitation Package Or Technical Information Will Be Issued. project: 534-23-106 Ae Upgrade Mechanical Systems Phase 2 work Location: Ralph H. Johnson Health Care System, Charleston, Sc estimated/target Completion Period: 360 Calendar Days After Award. construction Magnitude: Between $5,000,000 And $10,000,000 naics: 541310 Architectural Services small Business Standard: $12.5 Million set-aside: 100% Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) site Visits Will Not Be Arranged During This Phase. the Anticipated Award Date Of The Proposed A-e Contract Is On Or Before September 01, 2025. sf 330 Date Of Receipt/due Date: Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit One (1) Electronic Sf330 And Attachments If Any, No Later Than (nlt) 10:00 Am (est) February 5, 2025. project Overview: provide Professional Architect/engineer (a/e) Services Necessary For A Complete Design To Replace The Main Laboratories Air Handling Unit, Correct Hvac And Mechanical Systems Deficiencies, And Provide Compliant Temperature Control And Air Change Requirements By Areas As Defined In The Limits Of Work. Additional Scope Includes Assessment And Replacement Of Isolation Exhaust Systems And Steam-to-hot Water Heat Exchangers And Associated Pumps Located In Penthouse, Specialty Clinics, And Eye Specialty Clinic. The Project Will Include Temporary Hvac Considerations And Phasing To Enable Continued Operations. sdvosb Set-aside: this Requirement Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses Under The Authority Of 38 U.s.c. 8127(d). To Be Eligible For Award The Sdvosb You Must Be Considered Small Under The Relevant Naics Code. Sdvosb Contractors Must Be Verified And Viewable In Small Business Administration Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov Prior To Submission And Prior To Award Of Contract With Vaar 804.1103-70. Status As A Qualified Sdvosb Concern Is Under The Authority Of 38 Cfr Part 74 In Accordance With The Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 819. Any Person, Persons, Or Business Entity Suspected Of Misrepresenting Itself For The Purpose Of Securing A Government Contract May Be Criminally Investigated And Prosecuted For Fraud Against The United States Of America. Parties Found Misrepresenting Their Status Also Risk Debarment From Further Government Contracts. Eligible Sdvosb Concerns Must Also Be Registered At The Following Websites: system For Award Management (sam): Https://www.sam.gov/ vets100/100a Report Must Be Complete: Http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm important Notice: Prior To Submitting A Package Under This Sdvosb Set- Aside Solicitation; Offerors Must Apply For And Receive Verification From The Small Business Administration In Accordance With 38 Cfr Part 74 And Vaar 819.70 By Submission Of Documentation Of Veteran Status, Ownership, And Control Sufficient To Establish Appropriate Status. All Offerors Are Urged To Contact The Sba And Submit The Required Documents To Obtain Verification Of Their Sdvosb Status If They Have Not Already Done So. for A Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) To Be Considered As A Prospective Contractor, The Firm, Including Joint Ventures, Must Be Verified And Registered In The Small Business Administration Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov) And Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) At Time Of Submission Of Their Qualifications. Failure Of A Prospective Sdvosb To Be Verified By The Center For Veterans Enterprise (cve) At The Time The Sf 330 Is Submitted Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration. All Joint Ventures Must Be Cve Verified At Time Of Submission And Submit Agreements That Comply With 13cfr 125.15 Prior To Contract Award. sf 330 Selection Criteria: Evaluation Of Submission Requirements And Selection Criteria Are Provided Below And Listed In Relative Order Of Importance. note: Failure To Meet An Acceptable Submission Requirements For Each Criteria Will Result In The Entire Submission Being Denied For Further Evaluation. phase 1 Submission Requirements objective Scoring: Acceptable Submissions Meets All Submission Requirements Unacceptable Submission Fails To Meet At Least One Submission Requirement specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required. submission Requirements: sf 330 Information Shall Be Provided Per The Latest Format From The Gsa Library Located At Https://www.gsa.gov/forms-library/architect-engineer-qualifications. complete Using Blocks F. And H. Of The Sf330 Form. Complete Block F. For Each Relevant Project. Complete Block H. Summary Sheet For The Offeror And Each Key Consultant; Each Summary Sheet Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. submit No More Than Five (5) Projects Similar To Required Work In The Solicitation From The Date The Solicitation Closes To Five (5) Years Prior; at Minimum, Three (3) Projects Must Be Construction Complete Or Construction Substantially (50%+) Complete; projects/data Submitted Shall Be Projects With Total Construction Costs Of $6,000,000 And Greater; projects May Include Federal, State, Or Local Government, As Well As Private Industry Projects. Offerors Are Responsible For Providing Project Description And Applicable Information In Sufficient Detail To Permit Evaluation Of Project Relevancy Versus These Minimum Requirements. past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. submission Requirements: complete A Summary Sheet Using Block H. Of The Sf 330 Describing The Offeror S Past Performance. The Summary Sheet Shall Be Not More Than Two (2) Pages In Length. provide The Contractor Performance Assessment And Reporting System (cpars), Interim And Final Reports, For Each Submitted Federal Entity Project Under Specialized Experience Criteria, Above. If A Cpars Is Not Available, Provide A Ppq. if A Relevant Project Submitted Under Specialized Experience Criteria Does Not Have A Cpars Because It Is A Non-federal Entity Project, Provide A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq). cpar And Ppq Reports Will Not Count Towards Page Limitations. professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services. submission Requirements: complete Using Block E. Of The Sf 330. Submit Personal Resumes And Relevant Information For Key And Responsible Personnel. Block E. Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length Per Individual. the Offeror Shall Have A Professional Engineer, Currently Registered In Any Us State Or Territory Of The United States, Knowledgeable In Their Registered Design Discipline, To Be The Lead Designer Responsible For Reviewing And Approving Design Submissions. the Offeror Shall Have A Professional Engineer, Qualified And Knowledgeable Of South Carolina State And Local Regulations, Be The Lead Designer Responsible For Reviewing And Approving Design Submissions And Facilitating Permit Documentation (depending On The Nature Of The Design I.e. Environmental, Hazardous Material Abatement, Stormwater, Etc.). key Personnel To Provide Qualifications To Meet This Criterion Include Principal(s), Project Manager(s), Key Consultants, Individuals Responsible For Implementation Of The Design Qa/qc Plan, Licensed Asbestos Inspector, Physical Security Specialist, Life Safety Specialist, And Other Individuals That Are Responsible Or Accountable For Design Submissions And Regulatory Compliance. physical Security Subject Matter Experts Shall Meet The Requirements Of Section 10.1.5 Of The Physical Security & Resiliency Design Manual. experience In Construction Period Services. submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Describes The Offeror S Performance Completing Construction Period Services (cps) For Construction For Each Submitted Project Under Specialized Experience Criteria, Above. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than Two (2) Pages In Length. capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Describes The Offeror S Work Capacity. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. location In The General Geographical Area Of Charleston, Sc, And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Ralph H. Johnson Va Facility: submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Describes The Offeror S Experience In The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. the Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors: submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Discusses The Offeror S Approach. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. offerors Shall Complete And Submit The Following Statement In Block H. : I [signatory Authority], Of [offeror Company Or Joint Venture] Certify That The Team Proposed To Perform Under This Requirement Demonstrates The Capability Of 50% Sdvosb Performance In Compliance Of 48 Cfr 852.219-10 . phase 2 Evaluation Of Selection Criteria specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required. basis Of Evaluation: specialized Experience Pertains To The Types, Size, Volume, Budget, And Complexity Of Work Previously Or Currently Being Performed By The Offeror That Is Comparable To The Work Covered By This Solicitation. Specialized Experience May Also Include Unique Conditions, Considerations, Or Circumstances Encountered That Are Relevant To This Solicitation. specialized Experience Does Not Include Overseas Offices For Projects Outside The United States, Its Territories, Or Possessions; Nor Does It Include Subsidiaries That Are Not Normally Subject To Management Decisions, Accounting, And Policies, Or A Holding Or Parent Company Or An Incorporated Subsidiary That Operates Under A Firm Name Different From The Parent Company. technical Competence Includes Construction And Design Projects Similar In Project Scope, Size, Construction Features, Dollar Value, And Complexity Of That Listed In The Solicitation. Technical Competence Also Includes Experience In Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials. similar Complexity Is Considered Projects Of An Operational, Construction, Or Design Likeness To The Work Covered In The Solicitation. specific Emphasis Of Experience And Technical Competence Shall Be Geared Towards Fire Protection, Seismic Design/retrofit, Physical Security Resilience And Design, Healthcare Design/planning, Building Automatic System Design, And Mechanical/electrical System Design. past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. basis Of Evaluation: past Performance Is A Measure Of The Degree To Which An Offeror Satisfied Its Customers Needs And Requirements And Compliance With Applicable Codes, Standards, Laws, And Regulations. The Evaluation Of Past Performance Will Include But Is Not Limited To: the Customer S Assessment Of The Offeror's Commitment To Customer Satisfaction; timely Delivery Of Quality Work; the Offeror's Record Of Conforming To Contract Requirements And Applicable Codes, Standards, Laws, And Regulations; successful Implementation Of A Quality Control Plan And Quality Control Procedures; addressing Design Errors/omissions Timely; adherence To Approved Schedules; And, history Of Timely And Professional Communication And Cooperative Behavior. include Information On Problems (errors/omissions) Found, How The Problems Were Corrected, And The Impacts To The Successful Completion Of The Project (time Delays, Cost Impacts, Design Modifications, Etc.). provide Information Supporting Favorable Cost Control, Quality Of Design Submissions, And Schedule Compliance. include A Discussion On The Offeror S Record Of Significant Claims For Improper Or Incomplete Design Services. higher Ratings May Be Given For Work Performed On Va Medical Center Campuses. adjectival Rating: offeror Risks Receiving A Lower Rating If Fewer Than Three (3) Ppqs Are Provided Or If The Ppqs Were Not Completed By Project Point Of Contact. failure To Demonstrate Proven Competence To Perform Projects With Similar Requirements To The Requirements Of The Solicitation May Be Considered Ineligible For Award. if No Cpars Or Ppqs Are Submitted Or Responses To Requests Were Not Provided, The Rating Shall Not Be Higher Than Satisfactory . professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services. basis Of Evaluation: evaluation Of Professional Qualifications Will Include But Is Not Limited To The Subjective Assessment Of The Offeror's Individual Resumes. the Offeror Shall Describe And/or Depict Which Projects And How Well Key Personnel Of The Design Team Have Worked Together. higher Ratings For This Criterion May Be Given When The Offeror's Specific Personnel Demonstrate Relevant Credentials, Such As Involvement And Degree Of Involvement In Professional Organizations, Research/publications, Code/standard Body Involvement, Etc. adjectival Scoring: offerors Unable To Demonstrate Professional Qualifications Necessary To Perform Designs May Be Considered Ineligible For Award. experience In Construction Period Services. basis Of Evaluation: experience In Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work, And Cost Estimates Shall Be Included As An Evaluation Criterion When Construction Period Services Is Included In The Statement Of Work For A-e Services. evaluation Of The Offeror S Knowledge, Skills, And Abilities To Complete Necessary Cps To Support Successful Project Completion. provide A Narrative Describing The Below Services, But Not Limited To: professional Field Inspections, Both Scheduled And Emergent; maintaining A Comprehensive Submittal Log Inclusive Of Material Data, Shop Drawings, Certifications, Etc.; review Of Construction Submittals For Design Conformance, Variance, And Applicable Code/standard Compliance; providing Timely And Complete Responses To Requests For Information; providing Supporting Documentation (statements Of Work, Cost Estimates, Technical Reports, Etc.) For Construction Modifications; providing Record Drawing Documentation; process For Correcting Design Errors/omissions Identified During Construction; And, other Requirements Defined Under Cps In The Statement Of Work. capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. basis Of Evaluation: identify The Offeror S Past, Present And Projected Future Workload, Including Va Contracts Over The Previous 12 Months. describe The Offeror S Capacity To Incorporate This Solicitation S Work While Meeting Prescribed Dates For Current Workload. Each Key Team Member To Include % Of Available Capacity To Take On New Projects. evaluation Of This Factor Will Be An Assessment Of The Offeror S Ability To Complete Design Documents Within The Period Of Performance And Meet Solicitation Requirements. data Is Acceptable In Tables Or Charts. capacity < 25% Shall Be Rated Not Greater Than Satisfactory. higher Ratings May Be Given For This Criterion When Information Provided Exceeds The Minimum Requirements. location In The General Geographical Area Of Charleston, Sc, And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Ralph H. Johnson Va Facility: basis Of Evaluation: offerors Will Be Subjectively Evaluated Based On Their Knowledge (and The Knowledge Of Subcontractors) Of Unique Conditions Or Variables, Such As Familiarity Of Applicable Codes, Regulations, Construction Market & Labor Conditions, Geotechnical, Seismic, Weather, Environmental, Or Other Unique Considerations Found In Charleston, Sc And The Low Country Geographical Area. if Prior Experience In Charleston, Sc Is Minimal, Describe How The Design Team Plans To Obtain Specific Knowledge Of Local Conditions Or Project Features Required For A Compliant Design. data From Other Projects And Locations Are Acceptable To Highlight Knowledge Of The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area Or Areas Of Similar Nature. adjectival Scoring: offerors That Submit Relevant Projects Outside Of The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area May Be Given A Lower Rating Than Projects Within The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area. offerors That Demonstrate No Experience In The Geographical Area Shall Be Rated Not Higher Than Satisfactory . the Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors: basis Of Evaluation: offerors Shall Be Evaluated Based On Their Utilization Plans For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses (sdvosbs), Veteran-owned Small Businesses (vosbs), Or Other Types Of Small Businesses. offerors Shall Be Evaluated On The Expected Amount Of Work Versus Key Personnel To Verify The Above Signatory Statement. If Less Than 50% Of Work Is Estimated To Be Performed By The Prime Sdvosb, The Offeror May Be Given A Lower Rating. offerors Shall Submit Qualifications For Proposed Consultants Per Other Criteria In This Solicitation. selection Process: federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 36.6 (brooks Act) Selection Procedures Apply. The A-e Services Listed Herein Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act (public Law 92-582) As Implemented In Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) 36.6 And Vaar 836.6. Pursuant To Far, The Firm Responding To This Requirement Must Be Permitted, By Law, To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering And Meet All Required Qualifications For The State Of South Carolina. Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting A Qualifying Sf 330, Before The Closing Date And Time, Will Be Considered For Initial Selection Evaluation. Following Initial Evaluation Of The Sf330s Received Three Or More Firms That Are Considered The Most Highly Qualified To Provide The Type Of Services Required Will Be Selected For Interviews. Selected Firms Will Be Notified By Email Of Selection And Provided Further Instructions. selection And Evaluation Of Firms Shall Be Made Based On Sf 330 Submissions And Direct Responses To The Selection Criteria Identified Herein. Failure To Address All Selection Criteria Will Result In A Decreased Rating. evaluating Past Performance And Experience May Include Information Provided By The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Contracting Officer Knowledge Of Current Project Performance. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Removed From Consideration. firms That Design Or Prepare Specifications In Conjunction With This Contract Are Prohibited From Participating On Any Future Construction Contracts Based On Those Documents. All Projects Identified On The Sf330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. submission Criteria/requirements: The Sf 330 Form May Be Downloaded From Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/sf. Completed Sf 330 S Shall Include The Primary Firms, Subcontractor Firms And Any Consultants Expected To Be Used On The Project. Do Not Submit Information Incorporating By Reference. Prospective Firms Shall Address All Selection Criteria Factors Within Their Submitted Sf330 Packages. email Capacity Is Limited To Five (5) To Seven (7) Megabytes (megs). the Following Format Shall Be Used: cover Page With Solicitation Number, Project Title table Of Contents sf 330 S copy Of Current A/e License copy Of Current Vetbiz.gov Sdvosb Certification uei Number cage Code tax Id Number the E Mail Address And Phone Number Of The Primary Point Of Contact. all Sf330 Submittals And Questions Must Be Sent Electronically To The Attention Of Jennifer Smith, Contract Specialist At Jennifer.smith19c497@va.gov. Please Provide Pre-solicitation Number, Project Number, Project Title, And Firm Name In Subject Line Of Email. When Submitting Sf330s, If More Than One Email Is Sent, Please Number Emails In Subjects As 1 Of N . Submittals Received After The Date And Time Identified On Page One (1) Will Not Be Considered. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Be Negatively Evaluated. Facsimile Submittals Will Not Be Accepted. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf330. the Sf-330 Including Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information Shall Be In A Common Font Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. The Package Shall Be Submitted As A Single Application-generated (not Scanned), Searchable Pdf Document. A Page Is Defined As Each Face Of An 8.5 X 11-inch Sheet Of Paper Containing Information. it Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Sam.gov Contracting Business Opportunities Website At: Www.sam.gov For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submission Of Sf330s. attachments: see Attached Document: Ae Past Performance Questionnaire And Cover Letter.

Details: Demolition and dismantling work (house entrances): 151 m² clearing of building site, 12.9 m³ demolition of paving, 81 m demolition of concrete curb, 13 m² demolition of stair landing, demolition of bicycle racks; Demolition and dismantling work (green areas): 153 m² clearing of building site, felling of 2 trees, 66 m removal of hedge; Waste disposal; Earthworks: 153 m² vegetation base layer, sowing lawn, creating planning; Paving work: 312 m² cleaning of subsurface concrete stone, 13 m² concrete paving surface; Paving work at house entrances; 44 +9 block steps made of concrete stone, 136 m² frost protection layer, footpath and cycle path, paving surface; Metalwork: 12 bicycle racks, 5 railings; Planting work: plants and shrubs, care for one growing season; fire department access, parking spaces

Details: Purchase of an intelligent key storage system for the Oderland control center of the city of Frankfurt (oder) The city of Frankfurt (oder) is planning to convert the Oderland regional control center's current key management system to an electronically logging system including web-based user and key management in the fire, disaster protection and rescue department, Heinrich-Hildebrand-Str. 21. The housing of the key cabinet must be large enough for at least 40 key slots. With this allocation, at least 20 key slots including key security must be offered. Space must be provided for a further 20 key slots including key security. Removal must be possible with both an RFID transponder and a PIN. An emergency opening must be provided. 1 key cabinet housing with - key slots - key security - operating unit - RFID reader - administration software - commissioning of the system - installation of the software