Fire Tenders

Details: Purchase of an intelligent key storage system for the Oderland control center of the city of Frankfurt (oder) The city of Frankfurt (oder) is planning to convert the Oderland regional control center's current key management system to an electronically logging system including web-based user and key management in the fire, disaster protection and rescue department, Heinrich-Hildebrand-Str. 21. The housing of the key cabinet must be large enough for at least 40 key slots. With this allocation, at least 20 key slots including key security must be offered. Space must be provided for a further 20 key slots including key security. Removal must be possible with both an RFID transponder and a PIN. An emergency opening must be provided. 1 key cabinet housing with - key slots - key security - operating unit - RFID reader - administration software - commissioning of the system - installation of the software

Details: It is planned to acquire the Programming Services of Information Systems Used and Developed by Vmu (hereinafter - Purchase Object). Main Information Systems of the Customer, for which Programming Services are expected to be purchased: 3.1.1. "Miško Skaita" Information System of Forestry Works and Timber Accounting. "miško Skaita" works in the environment of the Windows Operating System and is supported by Client-Server Technology. Delphi Programming Technology is used. 3.1.2. Forest Fire Registration System. The system is implemented by Foxpro Technologies. 3.1.3. Nursery Data Management Computer Program "medelyndb". The program is implemented with Microsoft Access Technologies. 3.1.4. Accounting Is "db Accounting". Is Realized by Sap Advantage Database Server 12, C++, Clipper Technologies. The system is supported by the manufacturer, therefore only integrations with this system are expected from the side of other VMUs. 3.1.5. Nature Management Information System. It is implemented with Postgresql, Postgis and Qgis technologies.

Details: 2 this Is A Pre-solicitation Notice, This Not A Request For Proposals. This Is A Request For Sf-330 Architect/engineer Qualification Packages Only. all Information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Packages Or Technical Information Will Be Issued In This Phase. the Department Of Veteran Affairs Network 6 Contracting Office Is Seeking Qualified Architect-engineering (ae) Firms To Submit Standard Form 330 (sf 330) Architect/engineering Statement Of Qualifications For Project # 590-25-250 | Campus Streets And Walkways Lighting Improvements | Hampton Va Medical Center Located In Hampton, Virginia. Firms Submitting Qualification Packages Must Be Fully Licensed To Perform Designs As A Registered Professional Ae Firm In The United States To Be Considered For This Opportunity. network Contracting Office (nco) 6 Va Facility Locations Include: hampton Va Medical Center, 100 Emancipation Drive, Hampton, Va., 23667. this Acquisition Is 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb). prospective Contractors Are Cautioned That Proposal Submitted In Response To This Solicitation Must Meet The Criteria Identified By 38cfr, Part 74. The Sdvosb Concern Agrees That In The Performance Of The Contract, The Concern Will Comply With The Limitation On Subcontracting Requirements In Accordance With Vaar Clause 852-219-73 (jan 2023) (deviation), Va Notice Of Total Set-aside For Certified Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses. for A Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) To Be Considered As A Prospective Contractor, The Firm, Including Joint Ventures, Must Be Certified In Vetcert (veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov)) And Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) At Time Of Submission Of Their Qualification And Reporting To Vets -4212 Federal Contractor Reporting In Accordance With Far 52.222-37, Employment Reports On Veterans At Https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212. Failure Of A Prospective Sdvosb To Be Certified By The Veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov) At The Time The Sf 330 Is Submitted Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration. All Joint Ventures Must Be Cve Certified At Time Of Submission And Submit Agreements That Comply With 13cfr 125.15 Prior To Contract Award. contract Overview: A Firm Fixed Price A/e Design Service Contract Is Contemplated For Project # 590-25-250 | Campus Streets And Walkways Lighting Improvements. Iaw Vaar 836.204(f)(2) The Estimated Magnitude Of Construction For This Project Is Between $2,000,000 And $5,000,000. The Estimated/target Design Completion Period Is 390 Calendar Days After Issuance Of Notice To Proceed. The Naics Code For This Acquisition Is 541330, Engineering Services With A Size Standard Of $25.5 Million. project Scope: The Architect/engineer (a/e) Shall Provide Comprehensive Survey Of The Campus Street Signage, Street Lighting, Walkway Lighting, And Wayfinding Systems To Determine Current State And What Improvements Are Needed To Ensure Continued Operations. The Va Anticipates That The Survey Will Recommend Near Wholesale Replacement Of Street Signage, Wayfinding Systems And Major Improvements In Lighting Systems. The Project Request Includes Funding Intended To Address The Most Critical Issues First And Final Scope Will Be Determined By The Survey. selection Criteria: The A/e Source Selection Team Shall Utilize The Following Selection Criteria Listed In Descending Order Of Importance. the Architecture-engineer (ae) Must Demonstrate Its Qualifications With Respect To The Published Evaluation Criteria For All Services. The Department Of Veterans Affairs (va) Shall Evaluate Each Potential Contractor In Terms Of The Following: M - Firm Meets The Selection Criterion. Nm - Does Not Meet The Selection Criterion. the Submitted Sf-330s Will Be Evaluated On The Criteria Below, Listed In Order Of Importance: (1) Professional Qualifications (2) Specialized Experience And Technical Competence (3) Capacity To Accomplish The Work (4) Past Performance (5) Construction Period Services (6) Record Of Significant Claims (7) Set-aside (8) Location selection Criterion 1: Professional Qualifications professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services Showing Recent Experience Of The Project Team With Hospital Lighting/electrical Projects Completed Through Designed Within The Past Five (5) Years. Each Resume Shall Include A Minimum Of Two (2) Lighting/electrical Projects Through Completed Construction. team Member Designer Of Record Positions Required In This Project But Not Limited To: Electrical Engineer, Fire Protection Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Project Manager, And Structural Engineer. evaluation Considerations do The Qualifications Indicate That The Project Team Has Recent Direct Experience On Hospital Lighting/electrical Projects Designing Similar Improvements To Those Proposed At Hampton Vamc? Is The Architect/engineer Providing A Team Where Each Member Has More Than 5 Years Of Experience? What Will Be The Role Of Interns If Used During Design? firm Shall Provide A Table Of A Minimum Of 5 Comparable Lighting/electrical Projects Comparing Their Ige With The Bid/award Amount During Construction. selection Criterion 2: Specialized Experience And Technical Competence the Ae Must Have The Necessary Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required, Specifically Evaluating And Replacing Streets And Walkways Lighting On A Hospital S Campus. provide A Minimum Of Three (3) And No More Than Five (5) Projects That Are At Least 85% Complete Through Construction. Submitted Projects Must Be From Within The Past Five (5) Years And Should Be Projects That Best Illustrate Specialized Experience Of The Proposed Team. Example Projects Shall Note Project S Square Footage. All Projects Provided In The Sf-330 Must Be Completed By The Office, Branch, Regional Office, Or Individual Team Member Proposed To Manage And/or Perform Work Under This Contract. to Enable Verification, Firms Should Include The Unique Entity Id (sam Uei) Number Along With Each Firm S Name In The Sf-330 Part 1, Section F Item 25 Firms From Section C Involved In This Project, Block (1). Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification Number In Block 21. Include An Email Address And Phone Number For The Point Of Contact In Block 23(c). Include In The Project Description, The Contract Period Of Performance, Award Contract Value, Current Contract Value, And Summary Of The Work Performed That Demonstrates Relevance To Specialized Experience As Outlined Above. if The Contractor Served As A Subcontractor On A Project, Indicate The Value Of The Work They Provided Towards The Performance Of The Overall Project. If A Project Was Performed By A Joint Venture, And Not All Joint Venture Partners Are On The Team Proposed For This Contract, The Offeror/team Should Specifically Address The Work Performed By The Joint Venture Partner Offering/teaming On This Contract. Likewise, If The Offeror/team Member Worked As A Subcontractor On A Project, The Description Should Clearly Describe The Work Performed By The Offeror/team Member And The Roles And Responsibilities Of Each On The Project, Rather Than The Work Performed On The Project As A Whole. if The Project Description Does Not Clearly Delineate The Work Performed By The Entity/entities Offering/teaming On This Contract, The Project Could Be Eliminated From Consideration. additionally, Firms Are Required To Submit Information That Will Clearly Demonstrate Specific Experiences And Qualifications Of Proposed Personnel And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. Specifically List Similar Scoped Projects No More Than Five (5) Years Old That Clearly Show Participation. (see Sf330 Part I Section G, But Not Excluding Other Information Provided On The Sf330 And Supporting Documentation.) note: If The Offeror Is A Joint Venture, Information Should Be Submitted As A Joint Venture. However, If There Is No Information For The Joint Venture, Information Should Be Submitted For Each Joint Venture Partner, Not To Exceed A Total Of Five (5) Projects For This Criterion. Projects Shall Be Submitted On The Sf330. For Submittal Purposes, A Task Order On An Idiq Contract Is Considered A Project, As Is A Stand-alone Contract Award. Do Not List An Idiq Contract As An Example Of A Completed Project. Instead, List Relevant Completed Task Orders Or Stand-alone Contract Awards That Fit Within The Definition Above. Examples Of Project Work Submitted That Do Not Conform To This Requirement Will Not Be Evaluated. evaluation Considerations does The Architect/engineer Provide Evidence Of Understanding Of The Project; And Any Unique Architectural/engineering Aspects Associated With The Proposed Project And How To Address Them? selection Criteria 3: Capacity To Accomplish The Work the A/e Must Have The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time For Both The Prime And Sub-consultants. This Factor Evaluates The Ability Of The Firm, Given Their Current Projected Workload (percentage) And The Availability Of Their Key Personnel, To Accomplish The Possible Myriad Of Design Projects In The Required Time. The General Workload And Staffing Capacity Of The Design Office Will Be Evaluated. list Current Projects With A Design Fee Of Greater Than $100,000 Being Designed In The Firms Office. indicate The Firms Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Sub-consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period. describe Experience In Successfully Delivering Projects Per Performance Schedule, Providing Timely Construction Support, And Successfully Completing Multiple Projects With Similar Delivery Dates. volume Of Va Contract Awards In The Last 12 Months. evaluator Consideration: does The Proposed Design Team Have Sufficient Capacity To Work On This Project? has The Firm Demonstrated An Ability To Meet Design Schedules In The Past? has The Firm Demonstrated A Record Of Working Together As A Team? selection Criteria 4: Past Performance offerors Will Be Evaluated On Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules In A Hospital Setting. Provided Past Performance And Experience Shall Include Information In The Past Performance Questionnaires (ppqs) Or Cpars/acass For Criterion 2 Projects. Past Performance May Also Include Other Information Provided By The Firm Such As Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Other Information Available To The Government. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Rated Lower. evaluator Consideration: does The Proposed Architect/engineer Have Past Performance With Ratings Satisfactory And Above While Working On Hospital Projects? does The Architect/engineer Have A Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. are The Evaluations Provided For The Projects Listed In Specialized Experience? project Recency: a Project Will Be Considered Recent Only If Performance Was Completed Within Five (5) Years Of The Date Of Issuance Of This Public Announcement. Ongoing Projects Will Not Be Considered, As An Accurate Performance Record Cannot Exist For Work Not Yet Completed. submission Requirements: submit A Completed And Current (most Recent) Cpars/acass Evaluation For Each Project Submitted Under Criterion 2. If The Project Does Not Have A Completed Cpars/acass Evaluation, The Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Included In This Notice Is Provided For The Offeror Or Its Team Members To Submit To The Client. Please Ensure Correct Phone Numbers And Email Addresses Are Provided For The Client Point Of Contact. Do Not Submit A Ppq When A Completed Cpars/acass Is Available. submit No Less Than Three (3) And No More Than Five (5) Past Performance References For Recent And Relevant Projects Identified On Sf330 Part I Section F. Individual Completed Ppqs Should Be No More Than Five (5) Pages Long And Submitted With Your Sf-330. If The Offeror Is Unable To Obtain A Completed Ppq From A Client For A Project(s) Before The Response Date Set Forth In This Notice, Offerors Should Complete And Submit With Their Responses The First Page Of The Ppq (attachment C), Which Will Provide Contract And Client Information For The Respective Project(s). Offerors May Submit A Ppq From A Previous Special Notice/rfp. It Must Be On The Same Form Included With This Special Notice, And It Must Be Legible. Offerors Should Follow Up With Clients/references To Ensure Timely Submittal Of Questionnaires. if Requested By The Client, Questionnaires May Be Submitted Directly To The Government's Point Of Contact, Network Contracting Office 6, Attn: Shannon Brown Via Email At Shannonmarie.brown@va.gov Prior To The Response Date. Please Also Copy Guy Brooks At Guy.brooks@va.gov. evaluator Consideration: does The Proposed Architect/engineer Have Past Performance With Ratings Satisfactory And Above While Working On Hospital Projects? does The Architect/engineer Have A Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. are The Evaluations Provided For The Projects Listed In Specialized Experience? selection Criteria 5: Construction Period Services offerors Will Be Evaluated On The Quality Of The Construction Period Services Provided. Construction Period Services Include But Are Not Limited To Professional Field Inspections, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes. experience In Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work, And Cost Estimates Shall Be Included As An Evaluation Criterion When Construction Period Services Is Included In The Statement Of Work For A-e Services. provide Up To Three (3) Completed Projects In The Past Five (5) Years That Best Illustrates The Construction Period Services Performed By The Team. Describe Construction Period Services Provided And Whether The Project Was Completed Within Schedule And Budget. Include A Contract Number Or Project Identification, Include Name, Telephone Number, And Email Of The Completed Project Stakeholder. evaluator Consideration: what Evidence Do The Qualifications Provide As To The Architect/engineer S Commitment To Proactive And Consistent Representation During Construction Specifically Answering Rfis, Reviewing Submittals And Periodic Site Visits? selection Criteria 6: Record Of Significant Claims interested A/e Firms Must Share Any Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services. indicate Any Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services Within The Past Five (5) Years. selection Criteria 7: Set-aside the Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service- Disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors. selection Criteria 8: Location tie-breaker: if Evaluations Of Sf330 S Result In The Same Rating, Proximity To The Facility Will Be Used As A Tiebreaker. The Distance Will Be Determined According To Http://maps.google.com/. For Firms That Have Multiple/regional Offices, The Location Of The Primary Project Team Will Be Used To Calculate The Distance And Should Be Provided In The Sf330. If The Location Of The Primary Project Team Is Not Identified, The Location Of The Main Office Will Be Used. indicate The Location (physical Address) Of The Firms Or Teams, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices, Any Sub Consultants Offices, And The Location Of The Primary Project Team. Explain How This Will Be Advantageous To The Government. selection Procedures: this Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act Of 1972, Federal Acquisition Regulation 36.6 (far) And Va Acquisition Regulation 836.6 (vaar) And Va Acquisition Manual (vaam) 836.6. Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting A Qualifying Sf 330, Before The Closing Date And Time, Will Be Considered For Initial Selection Evaluation. Following Initial Evaluation Of The Sf330s Received Three Or More Firms That Are Considered The Most Highly Qualified To Provide The Type Of Services Required Will Be Selected For Interviews. Selected Firms Will Be Notified By Telephone Or Email Of Selection And Provided Further Instructions. selection And Evaluation Of Firms Shall Be Made Based On Sf 330 Submissions And Direct Responses To The Selection Criteria Identified Herein. Failure To Address All Selection Criteria Will Result In A Decreased Rating. evaluating Past Performance And Experience May Include Information Provided By The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Contracting Officer Knowledge Of Current Project Performance. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Could Result In A Firm Being Removed From Consideration. If Relevant Cpars Evaluation(s) Are Available, Report(s) Shall Be Submitted With The Completed Sf330 Package. If There Is Not A Completed Cpars Evaluation, The Ppq Included With This Notice Is Provided For The Offeror Or Its Team Members To Submit For Each Project Included In Criterion (2). Official Cpars Evaluation(s) Found In In Government Databases Will Take Precedence. Completed Ppqs Should Be Submitted With Your Sf330. firms That Design Or Prepare Specifications In Conjunction With This Contract Are Prohibited From Participating On Any Future Construction Contracts Based On Those Documents. All Projects Identified On The Sf330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. submission Requirements. the Sf 330 Form May Be Downloaded From Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/sf. Completed Sf 330 S Shall Include The Primary Firms, Subcontractor Firms And Any Consultants Expected To Be Used On The Project. Do Not Submit Information Incorporating By Reference. Prospective Firms Shall Address All Selection Criteria Factors Within Their Submitted Sf330 Packages. the Following Format Should Be Used: cover Page With Solicitation Number, Project Title. table Of Contents. sf 330. acceptability Under Other Appropriate Evaluation Criteria, I.e., Sf 330, Section H. copy Of Current A/e State Engineer/architect License. unique Entity Id (uei). tax Id Number. the E Mail Address And Phone Number Of The Primary Point Of Contact. sf 330 Date Of Receipt/due Date: Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit One (1) Electronic Sf 330 And Attachments (if Any) No Later Than 10:00 Am Est On January 30, 2025. Email Capacity Is Limited To Seven (7) To Ten (10) Megabytes (megs). all Sf330 Submittals And Questions Must Be Sent Electronically To The Attention Of Contract Specialist Shannon Brown, Shannonmarie.brown@va.gov And Guy Brooks, Contracting Officer At Guy.brooks@va.gov. Please Provide Pre-solicitation Number, Project Title, And Firm Name In Subject Line Of Email. When Submitting Sf330s, If More Than One Email Is Sent, Please Number Emails In Subjects As 1 Of N . Submittals Received After The Date And Time Identified On Page One (1) Will Not Be Considered. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Be Negatively Evaluated. the Sf-330 Including Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information Shall Not Exceed A Total Of 50 Pages In A Common Font Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. The Proposal Shall Be Submitted As A Single Application-generated (not Scanned), Searchable Pdf Document. A Page Is Defined As Each Face Of An 8.5 X 11-inch Sheet Of Paper Containing Information. The Page Limitation Does Not Apply To The Licenses, Contract Performance Evaluations, (i.e., Cpars) And Award Documentation. This Information Should Be Provided As Attachments To The Sf 330. all Questions Regarding This Announcement Must Be Emailed To The Contract Specialist Shannon Brown At Shannonmarie.brown@va.gov And Contracting Officer Guy Brooks At Guy.brooks@va.gov site Visits Will Not Be Arranged This Phase. this Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For Architect/engineering (a/e) Design Services; No Solicitation Package Will Be Issued Until After An Evaluation Has Been Made On The Provided Sf-330. Only The A/e Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting An Sf330 Package On Time Will Be Considered For Initial Evaluation. see Attached Documents: attachment 1 Statement Of Work attachment 2 Pre-construction Assessment/ Evaluation attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire

Details: Presolicitation Notice presolicitation Notice presolicitation Notice *=required Field presolicitation Notice this Pre-solicitation Notice Is Not A Request For Proposal. All Information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Are Contained Herein. No Additional Solicitation Package Or Technical Information Will Be Issued. project: 534-23-106 Ae Upgrade Mechanical Systems Phase 2 work Location: Ralph H. Johnson Health Care System, Charleston, Sc estimated/target Completion Period: 360 Calendar Days After Award. construction Magnitude: Between $5,000,000 And $10,000,000 naics: 541310 Architectural Services small Business Standard: $12.5 Million set-aside: 100% Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) site Visits Will Not Be Arranged During This Phase. the Anticipated Award Date Of The Proposed A-e Contract Is On Or Before September 01, 2025. sf 330 Date Of Receipt/due Date: Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit One (1) Electronic Sf330 And Attachments If Any, No Later Than (nlt) 10:00 Am (est) February 5, 2025. project Overview: provide Professional Architect/engineer (a/e) Services Necessary For A Complete Design To Replace The Main Laboratories Air Handling Unit, Correct Hvac And Mechanical Systems Deficiencies, And Provide Compliant Temperature Control And Air Change Requirements By Areas As Defined In The Limits Of Work. Additional Scope Includes Assessment And Replacement Of Isolation Exhaust Systems And Steam-to-hot Water Heat Exchangers And Associated Pumps Located In Penthouse, Specialty Clinics, And Eye Specialty Clinic. The Project Will Include Temporary Hvac Considerations And Phasing To Enable Continued Operations. sdvosb Set-aside: this Requirement Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses Under The Authority Of 38 U.s.c. 8127(d). To Be Eligible For Award The Sdvosb You Must Be Considered Small Under The Relevant Naics Code. Sdvosb Contractors Must Be Verified And Viewable In Small Business Administration Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov Prior To Submission And Prior To Award Of Contract With Vaar 804.1103-70. Status As A Qualified Sdvosb Concern Is Under The Authority Of 38 Cfr Part 74 In Accordance With The Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 819. Any Person, Persons, Or Business Entity Suspected Of Misrepresenting Itself For The Purpose Of Securing A Government Contract May Be Criminally Investigated And Prosecuted For Fraud Against The United States Of America. Parties Found Misrepresenting Their Status Also Risk Debarment From Further Government Contracts. Eligible Sdvosb Concerns Must Also Be Registered At The Following Websites: system For Award Management (sam): Https://www.sam.gov/ vets100/100a Report Must Be Complete: Http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm important Notice: Prior To Submitting A Package Under This Sdvosb Set- Aside Solicitation; Offerors Must Apply For And Receive Verification From The Small Business Administration In Accordance With 38 Cfr Part 74 And Vaar 819.70 By Submission Of Documentation Of Veteran Status, Ownership, And Control Sufficient To Establish Appropriate Status. All Offerors Are Urged To Contact The Sba And Submit The Required Documents To Obtain Verification Of Their Sdvosb Status If They Have Not Already Done So. for A Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) To Be Considered As A Prospective Contractor, The Firm, Including Joint Ventures, Must Be Verified And Registered In The Small Business Administration Veteran Small Business Certification (vetcert) Database (https://veterans.certify.sba.gov) And Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) At Time Of Submission Of Their Qualifications. Failure Of A Prospective Sdvosb To Be Verified By The Center For Veterans Enterprise (cve) At The Time The Sf 330 Is Submitted Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration. All Joint Ventures Must Be Cve Verified At Time Of Submission And Submit Agreements That Comply With 13cfr 125.15 Prior To Contract Award. sf 330 Selection Criteria: Evaluation Of Submission Requirements And Selection Criteria Are Provided Below And Listed In Relative Order Of Importance. note: Failure To Meet An Acceptable Submission Requirements For Each Criteria Will Result In The Entire Submission Being Denied For Further Evaluation. phase 1 Submission Requirements objective Scoring: Acceptable Submissions Meets All Submission Requirements Unacceptable Submission Fails To Meet At Least One Submission Requirement specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required. submission Requirements: sf 330 Information Shall Be Provided Per The Latest Format From The Gsa Library Located At Https://www.gsa.gov/forms-library/architect-engineer-qualifications. complete Using Blocks F. And H. Of The Sf330 Form. Complete Block F. For Each Relevant Project. Complete Block H. Summary Sheet For The Offeror And Each Key Consultant; Each Summary Sheet Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. submit No More Than Five (5) Projects Similar To Required Work In The Solicitation From The Date The Solicitation Closes To Five (5) Years Prior; at Minimum, Three (3) Projects Must Be Construction Complete Or Construction Substantially (50%+) Complete; projects/data Submitted Shall Be Projects With Total Construction Costs Of $6,000,000 And Greater; projects May Include Federal, State, Or Local Government, As Well As Private Industry Projects. Offerors Are Responsible For Providing Project Description And Applicable Information In Sufficient Detail To Permit Evaluation Of Project Relevancy Versus These Minimum Requirements. past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. submission Requirements: complete A Summary Sheet Using Block H. Of The Sf 330 Describing The Offeror S Past Performance. The Summary Sheet Shall Be Not More Than Two (2) Pages In Length. provide The Contractor Performance Assessment And Reporting System (cpars), Interim And Final Reports, For Each Submitted Federal Entity Project Under Specialized Experience Criteria, Above. If A Cpars Is Not Available, Provide A Ppq. if A Relevant Project Submitted Under Specialized Experience Criteria Does Not Have A Cpars Because It Is A Non-federal Entity Project, Provide A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq). cpar And Ppq Reports Will Not Count Towards Page Limitations. professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services. submission Requirements: complete Using Block E. Of The Sf 330. Submit Personal Resumes And Relevant Information For Key And Responsible Personnel. Block E. Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length Per Individual. the Offeror Shall Have A Professional Engineer, Currently Registered In Any Us State Or Territory Of The United States, Knowledgeable In Their Registered Design Discipline, To Be The Lead Designer Responsible For Reviewing And Approving Design Submissions. the Offeror Shall Have A Professional Engineer, Qualified And Knowledgeable Of South Carolina State And Local Regulations, Be The Lead Designer Responsible For Reviewing And Approving Design Submissions And Facilitating Permit Documentation (depending On The Nature Of The Design I.e. Environmental, Hazardous Material Abatement, Stormwater, Etc.). key Personnel To Provide Qualifications To Meet This Criterion Include Principal(s), Project Manager(s), Key Consultants, Individuals Responsible For Implementation Of The Design Qa/qc Plan, Licensed Asbestos Inspector, Physical Security Specialist, Life Safety Specialist, And Other Individuals That Are Responsible Or Accountable For Design Submissions And Regulatory Compliance. physical Security Subject Matter Experts Shall Meet The Requirements Of Section 10.1.5 Of The Physical Security & Resiliency Design Manual. experience In Construction Period Services. submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Describes The Offeror S Performance Completing Construction Period Services (cps) For Construction For Each Submitted Project Under Specialized Experience Criteria, Above. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than Two (2) Pages In Length. capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Describes The Offeror S Work Capacity. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. location In The General Geographical Area Of Charleston, Sc, And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Ralph H. Johnson Va Facility: submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Describes The Offeror S Experience In The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. the Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors: submission Requirements: complete Using Block H. Of The Sf 330. Provide A Narrative That Discusses The Offeror S Approach. Narrative Shall Be Not More Than One (1) Page In Length. offerors Shall Complete And Submit The Following Statement In Block H. : I [signatory Authority], Of [offeror Company Or Joint Venture] Certify That The Team Proposed To Perform Under This Requirement Demonstrates The Capability Of 50% Sdvosb Performance In Compliance Of 48 Cfr 852.219-10 . phase 2 Evaluation Of Selection Criteria specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required. basis Of Evaluation: specialized Experience Pertains To The Types, Size, Volume, Budget, And Complexity Of Work Previously Or Currently Being Performed By The Offeror That Is Comparable To The Work Covered By This Solicitation. Specialized Experience May Also Include Unique Conditions, Considerations, Or Circumstances Encountered That Are Relevant To This Solicitation. specialized Experience Does Not Include Overseas Offices For Projects Outside The United States, Its Territories, Or Possessions; Nor Does It Include Subsidiaries That Are Not Normally Subject To Management Decisions, Accounting, And Policies, Or A Holding Or Parent Company Or An Incorporated Subsidiary That Operates Under A Firm Name Different From The Parent Company. technical Competence Includes Construction And Design Projects Similar In Project Scope, Size, Construction Features, Dollar Value, And Complexity Of That Listed In The Solicitation. Technical Competence Also Includes Experience In Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials. similar Complexity Is Considered Projects Of An Operational, Construction, Or Design Likeness To The Work Covered In The Solicitation. specific Emphasis Of Experience And Technical Competence Shall Be Geared Towards Fire Protection, Seismic Design/retrofit, Physical Security Resilience And Design, Healthcare Design/planning, Building Automatic System Design, And Mechanical/electrical System Design. past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. basis Of Evaluation: past Performance Is A Measure Of The Degree To Which An Offeror Satisfied Its Customers Needs And Requirements And Compliance With Applicable Codes, Standards, Laws, And Regulations. The Evaluation Of Past Performance Will Include But Is Not Limited To: the Customer S Assessment Of The Offeror's Commitment To Customer Satisfaction; timely Delivery Of Quality Work; the Offeror's Record Of Conforming To Contract Requirements And Applicable Codes, Standards, Laws, And Regulations; successful Implementation Of A Quality Control Plan And Quality Control Procedures; addressing Design Errors/omissions Timely; adherence To Approved Schedules; And, history Of Timely And Professional Communication And Cooperative Behavior. include Information On Problems (errors/omissions) Found, How The Problems Were Corrected, And The Impacts To The Successful Completion Of The Project (time Delays, Cost Impacts, Design Modifications, Etc.). provide Information Supporting Favorable Cost Control, Quality Of Design Submissions, And Schedule Compliance. include A Discussion On The Offeror S Record Of Significant Claims For Improper Or Incomplete Design Services. higher Ratings May Be Given For Work Performed On Va Medical Center Campuses. adjectival Rating: offeror Risks Receiving A Lower Rating If Fewer Than Three (3) Ppqs Are Provided Or If The Ppqs Were Not Completed By Project Point Of Contact. failure To Demonstrate Proven Competence To Perform Projects With Similar Requirements To The Requirements Of The Solicitation May Be Considered Ineligible For Award. if No Cpars Or Ppqs Are Submitted Or Responses To Requests Were Not Provided, The Rating Shall Not Be Higher Than Satisfactory . professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services. basis Of Evaluation: evaluation Of Professional Qualifications Will Include But Is Not Limited To The Subjective Assessment Of The Offeror's Individual Resumes. the Offeror Shall Describe And/or Depict Which Projects And How Well Key Personnel Of The Design Team Have Worked Together. higher Ratings For This Criterion May Be Given When The Offeror's Specific Personnel Demonstrate Relevant Credentials, Such As Involvement And Degree Of Involvement In Professional Organizations, Research/publications, Code/standard Body Involvement, Etc. adjectival Scoring: offerors Unable To Demonstrate Professional Qualifications Necessary To Perform Designs May Be Considered Ineligible For Award. experience In Construction Period Services. basis Of Evaluation: experience In Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During The Construction Period, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Requests For Information During The Construction Period, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work, And Cost Estimates Shall Be Included As An Evaluation Criterion When Construction Period Services Is Included In The Statement Of Work For A-e Services. evaluation Of The Offeror S Knowledge, Skills, And Abilities To Complete Necessary Cps To Support Successful Project Completion. provide A Narrative Describing The Below Services, But Not Limited To: professional Field Inspections, Both Scheduled And Emergent; maintaining A Comprehensive Submittal Log Inclusive Of Material Data, Shop Drawings, Certifications, Etc.; review Of Construction Submittals For Design Conformance, Variance, And Applicable Code/standard Compliance; providing Timely And Complete Responses To Requests For Information; providing Supporting Documentation (statements Of Work, Cost Estimates, Technical Reports, Etc.) For Construction Modifications; providing Record Drawing Documentation; process For Correcting Design Errors/omissions Identified During Construction; And, other Requirements Defined Under Cps In The Statement Of Work. capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. basis Of Evaluation: identify The Offeror S Past, Present And Projected Future Workload, Including Va Contracts Over The Previous 12 Months. describe The Offeror S Capacity To Incorporate This Solicitation S Work While Meeting Prescribed Dates For Current Workload. Each Key Team Member To Include % Of Available Capacity To Take On New Projects. evaluation Of This Factor Will Be An Assessment Of The Offeror S Ability To Complete Design Documents Within The Period Of Performance And Meet Solicitation Requirements. data Is Acceptable In Tables Or Charts. capacity < 25% Shall Be Rated Not Greater Than Satisfactory. higher Ratings May Be Given For This Criterion When Information Provided Exceeds The Minimum Requirements. location In The General Geographical Area Of Charleston, Sc, And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Ralph H. Johnson Va Facility: basis Of Evaluation: offerors Will Be Subjectively Evaluated Based On Their Knowledge (and The Knowledge Of Subcontractors) Of Unique Conditions Or Variables, Such As Familiarity Of Applicable Codes, Regulations, Construction Market & Labor Conditions, Geotechnical, Seismic, Weather, Environmental, Or Other Unique Considerations Found In Charleston, Sc And The Low Country Geographical Area. if Prior Experience In Charleston, Sc Is Minimal, Describe How The Design Team Plans To Obtain Specific Knowledge Of Local Conditions Or Project Features Required For A Compliant Design. data From Other Projects And Locations Are Acceptable To Highlight Knowledge Of The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area Or Areas Of Similar Nature. adjectival Scoring: offerors That Submit Relevant Projects Outside Of The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area May Be Given A Lower Rating Than Projects Within The Charleston, Sc Geographical Area. offerors That Demonstrate No Experience In The Geographical Area Shall Be Rated Not Higher Than Satisfactory . the Extent To Which Potential Contractors Identify And Commit To The Use Of Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors: basis Of Evaluation: offerors Shall Be Evaluated Based On Their Utilization Plans For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses (sdvosbs), Veteran-owned Small Businesses (vosbs), Or Other Types Of Small Businesses. offerors Shall Be Evaluated On The Expected Amount Of Work Versus Key Personnel To Verify The Above Signatory Statement. If Less Than 50% Of Work Is Estimated To Be Performed By The Prime Sdvosb, The Offeror May Be Given A Lower Rating. offerors Shall Submit Qualifications For Proposed Consultants Per Other Criteria In This Solicitation. selection Process: federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 36.6 (brooks Act) Selection Procedures Apply. The A-e Services Listed Herein Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act (public Law 92-582) As Implemented In Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) 36.6 And Vaar 836.6. Pursuant To Far, The Firm Responding To This Requirement Must Be Permitted, By Law, To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering And Meet All Required Qualifications For The State Of South Carolina. Firms Responding To This Announcement By Submitting A Qualifying Sf 330, Before The Closing Date And Time, Will Be Considered For Initial Selection Evaluation. Following Initial Evaluation Of The Sf330s Received Three Or More Firms That Are Considered The Most Highly Qualified To Provide The Type Of Services Required Will Be Selected For Interviews. Selected Firms Will Be Notified By Email Of Selection And Provided Further Instructions. selection And Evaluation Of Firms Shall Be Made Based On Sf 330 Submissions And Direct Responses To The Selection Criteria Identified Herein. Failure To Address All Selection Criteria Will Result In A Decreased Rating. evaluating Past Performance And Experience May Include Information Provided By The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Contracting Officer Knowledge Of Current Project Performance. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Removed From Consideration. firms That Design Or Prepare Specifications In Conjunction With This Contract Are Prohibited From Participating On Any Future Construction Contracts Based On Those Documents. All Projects Identified On The Sf330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. submission Criteria/requirements: The Sf 330 Form May Be Downloaded From Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/sf. Completed Sf 330 S Shall Include The Primary Firms, Subcontractor Firms And Any Consultants Expected To Be Used On The Project. Do Not Submit Information Incorporating By Reference. Prospective Firms Shall Address All Selection Criteria Factors Within Their Submitted Sf330 Packages. email Capacity Is Limited To Five (5) To Seven (7) Megabytes (megs). the Following Format Shall Be Used: cover Page With Solicitation Number, Project Title table Of Contents sf 330 S copy Of Current A/e License copy Of Current Vetbiz.gov Sdvosb Certification uei Number cage Code tax Id Number the E Mail Address And Phone Number Of The Primary Point Of Contact. all Sf330 Submittals And Questions Must Be Sent Electronically To The Attention Of Jennifer Smith, Contract Specialist At Jennifer.smith19c497@va.gov. Please Provide Pre-solicitation Number, Project Number, Project Title, And Firm Name In Subject Line Of Email. When Submitting Sf330s, If More Than One Email Is Sent, Please Number Emails In Subjects As 1 Of N . Submittals Received After The Date And Time Identified On Page One (1) Will Not Be Considered. Firms Not Providing The Required Information May Be Negatively Evaluated. Facsimile Submittals Will Not Be Accepted. All Information Must Be Included In The Sf330. the Sf-330 Including Title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information Shall Be In A Common Font Size 12 Font, Single Spaced. The Package Shall Be Submitted As A Single Application-generated (not Scanned), Searchable Pdf Document. A Page Is Defined As Each Face Of An 8.5 X 11-inch Sheet Of Paper Containing Information. it Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Check The Sam.gov Contracting Business Opportunities Website At: Www.sam.gov For Any Revisions To This Announcement Prior To Submission Of Sf330s. attachments: see Attached Document: Ae Past Performance Questionnaire And Cover Letter.

Details: N44255-25-r-1501 Full And Open Indefinite Delivery/indefinite Quantity Contract For Architect-engineer Services For Marine Waterfront Architect-engineereing (wf A-e) Services At Various Locations Within Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (navfac) Northwest Area Of Responsibility (aor), Primarily Washington Statedescription: All Information Needed For Interested Parties To Submit A Standard Form Sf 330, Architect Engineer Qualifications Is Contained Herein. There Is No Separate Request For Proposals (rfp) Package To Download.this Procurement Will Result In One Indefinite Delivery/indefinite Quantity (idiq) Contract For Multi-discipline Architect-engineer (a-e) Services Primarily For Marine - Waterfront Projects At Locations In The Navfac Northwest Aor Including The States Of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota, Iowa, And Wyoming. These Services Will Be Procured In Accordance With 40 Usc Chapter 11, Selection Of Architects And Engineers, As Implemented By Far Subpart 36.6. The Idiq Period Of Performance Will Be For A Base Period Of (2) Two Years And One Three (3) Year Option Period For Maximum Duration Of 60 Months. The Total Fee For The Contract Term Shall Not Exceed $249m. The Guaranteed Minimum For The Contract Term (including Option Years) Is $5,000. Firm-fixed Price Task Orders Will Be Negotiated For This Contract. There Will Be No Dollar Limit Per Task Order And No Dollar Limit Per Year.this Proposed Contract Is Being Solicited On A Full And Open Basis. The North American Industrial Classification System (naics) Code Is 541330 ? Engineering Services And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $22.5m. The Government Seeks The Most Highly Qualified Firm To Perform The Required Services, Based On The Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Type Of Professional Services Required And At Fair And Reasonable Prices, In Accordance With The Selection Criteria. The Market Research Study (sources Sought Number: N44255-24-r-1500) Conducted By Navfac Northwest Included An Assessment Of Relevant Qualifications And Capabilities Of Potentially Qualified Firms. As A Result Of The Market Research Analysis, A Determination Was Made To Solicit This Procurement On An Unrestricted Basis Inviting Full And Open Competition. The Navfac Northwest Deputy For Small Business Concurs With This Decision.the A-e Firm Is Expected To Provide An Interdisciplinary Team To Furnish Engineering And Design Services For Marine Waterfront Projects At Various Locations Predominantly Serviced By The Navfac Northwest Office. The Design And Engineering Services Will Require Expertise In Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Civil, Structural, Geotechnical, Corrosion Control, Coastal, Naval Architect, Fire Protection, Survey, Cost And Environmental Disciplines As It Pertains To Department Of Defense Waterfront/marine Facilities And Systems. Services May Include New Designs, Evaluations, Inspections And/or Studies For Maintenance, Construction, Equipment Installation, New Construction Repair And Replacement Of Piers, Wharves, Quay Walls, Dry Docks, Fendering Systems, Floating Metal Or Concrete Structures, Wave Attenuation Devices, Dredging, Etc., Including Utilities. The Work May Also Include Field Investigations, Technical Feasibility Assessments, Design Analysis, Structural/seismic Evaluation, Underwater Inspection, Geotechnical Evaluation, Cathodic Protection, Surveying, Cost Estimating, Technical Review Of Contract Documents Prepared By Government Employees, And Construction Support Consultation. At The Governments Discretion Up To 20% Of The Contract Value May Be Awarded For Non-waterfront Specific Designs Or Studies Including But Not Limited To New Construction Or Renovation Of Warehouses, Hangars, Administration Facilities, Barracks, Industrial Facilities, And/or Utilities.the Awarded Contract Will Be Subject To Specific Provisions Addressing The Avoidance Of Organizational Conflicts Of Interest. The Prime Firm For This Contract Will Be Required To Perform Throughout The Contract Term.interviews May Be Scheduled With Firms Slated As The Most Highly Qualified. Firms Slated For Interviews May Be Asked To Clarify Information Contained In The Sf330 Submittal. Elaborate Presentations Are Not Desired.selection Criteriafirms Responding To This Synopsis Will Be Evaluated To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms To Perform The Required Services In Accordance With The Published Selection Criteria. Failure To Comply With Instructions Or Provide Complete Information May Affect The Firms Evaluation Or Disqualify The Firm From Further Consideration. Criteria 1 And 2 Are Most Important And Equally Weighted. Criteria 3 Through 8 Are In Descending Order Of Importance. Specific Selection Criteria Include:1 - Specialized Experience And Sustainable Design2 - Professional Qualifications3 - Past Performance 4 - Quality Control 5 - Program Management And Capacity6 - Location7 - Commitment To Small Business8 - Volume Of Workcriterion 1 ?specialized Experience And Sustainable Design (sf330, Part I, Section F): Firms Will Be Evaluated On Specialized Experience In Performance Of Services Like Those Anticipated Under This Contract Through Evaluation Of Experience In: 1. design Of Waterfront Structures And Facilities (e.g. Piers, Wharves, Dry Docks).2. design Of Waterfront Utilities (e.g. Electrical, Compressed Air, Oily Waste)3. experience Using Department Of Defense Waterfront Unified Facilities Criteria4. experience Applying Sustainability Concepts Through An Integrated, Cost-effective Design Approach And Designing In Accordance With Recognized Sustainability Rating Systems Such As Green Globe, Leed, Etc.firms May Be Considered More Favorably By Demonstrating The Following: 1. projects Where Offeror Was The Prime Architect-engineer And Design Fees Were Above $4,000,000.submission Requirements: Provide A Maximum Of Five (5) Projects With The Design Complete Within The Past Ten (10) Years Immediately Preceding The Date Of Issuance Of This Notice That Best Demonstrate Specialized Experience Of The Proposed Team In The Areas Outlined Above. Sufficient Information To Determine The Date Of Completion Of The Project Must Be Included In The Project Description Or The Project Will Not Be Considered. If More Than The Maximum Number Of Projects Are Submitted, The Government Will Only Evaluate Projects Up To The Maximum Number Authorized In The Order Submitted.all Projects Provided In The Sf330 Must Be Completed By The Actual Office/branch/regional Office/individual Team Member Proposed To Manage And Perform Work Under This Contract. Projects Not Meeting This Requirement Will Be Excluded From Consideration In The Evaluation. To Enable Verification, Firms Should Include:1. the Unique Entity Identifier (uei) Number Along With Each Firms Name In The Sf330 Part 1, Section F, Block 25, Firm Name; 2. include A Contract Number Or Project Identification Number In Block 21;3. include An E-mail Address And Phone Number For The Point Of Contact In Block 23(c); 4. in Block 24, Include In The Project Description, The Contract Period Of Performance, Award Contract Value, Current Contract Value, And A Summary Of The Work Performed That Demonstrates Relevance To Specialized Experience As Outlined Above;5. for Projects Performed As A Subcontractor Or A Joint Venture Involving Different Partners, Specifically Indicate The Value Of The Work Performed As A Subcontractor Or By Those Firms Proposed For This Contract, And Identify The Specific Roles And Responsibilities Performed As A Subcontractor Or By Those Firms On The Project Rather Than The Work Performed On The Project As A Whole. If The Project Description Does Not Clearly Delineate The Work Performed By The Entity/entities Offering/teaming On This Contract, The Project Could Be Eliminated From Consideration.note: If The Firm Is A Joint Venture, Projects Performed By The Joint Venture Should Be Submitted; However, If There Are No Projects Performed By The Joint Venture, Projects Shall Be Submitted For Each Joint Venture Partner. Firms Failing To Provide Projects From All Joint Venture Partners Will Be Considered To Have Not Met The Requirements Of The Criterion. Projects Shall Be Submitted On The Sf-330 At Part I, Section F And Shall Be Completed Projects. Projects Not Complete Will Be Excluded From Evaluation Consideration. For Submittal Purposes, A Task Order On An Idiq Contract Is Considered A Project, As Is A Stand-alone Contract Award. Do Not Submit An Idiq Contract As An Example Project. Instead, List Relevant Task Orders Or Stand-alone Contract Awards As Individual Projects That Fit Within The Definition Above. The Government Will Not Evaluate Information Provided For An Idiq Contract. Examples Of Project Work Submitted That Do Not Conform To This Requirement Will Not Be Evaluated. All Information For Criterion 1 Should Be Submitted In The Sf330, Part I, Section F Of The Form. The Government Will Not Consider Information Submitted In Addition To Part 1, Section F In Evaluation Of Criterion 1.criterion 2 ? Professional Qualifications And Technical Competence (sf330, Part I, Sections E And G): Firms Will Be Evaluated On Professional Qualifications, Competence, And Experience Of The Proposed Key Personnel In Providing Services To Accomplish The Tasks Required Under This Contract, Including Participation In Example Projects In The Sf330, Part 1, Section G.key Personnel Are Individuals Who Will Have Major Contract Or Project Management Responsibilities And/or Will Provide Unusual Or Unique Expertise. All Key Personnel Must Be A Licensed Professional In Their Discipline And Have At Least Five (5) Years Of Demonstrated Experience On Waterfront Projects. Specific Disciplines That Shall Be Included In Key Personnel Are:� project Manager� design Quality Control Manager� senior Structural Engineer� senior Civil Engineer� senior Geotechnical Engineersubmission Requirements (sf330, Part I, Section E):provide Resumes For All Proposed Key Personnel That Illustrate Experience In The Work Proposed Under This Contract. Resumes Are Limited To 2 Pages And Should Indicate: Professional Registration, Certification, Licensure And/or Accreditation In Appropriate Disciplines; Cite Recent (within The Past Ten (10) Years) Project-specific Experience In Work Relevant To The Services Required Under This Contract; And Indicate Proposed Role In This Contract. Indicate Participation Of Key Personnel In Example Projects In The Sf330, Part 1, Section G.criterion 3 ? Past Performance (sf330, Part I, Section H):firms Will Be Evaluated On Past Performance With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Work Quality, Compliance With Schedules, Cost Control, And Stakeholder/customer Satisfaction. Evaluating Past Performance And Experience Will Include Information Provided In Past Performance Questionnaires (ppqs) Or Cpars/acass For Criterion 1 Projects And May Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, And Other Information Available To The Government Including Contracts With Points Of Contact In Other Criteria. Note: Past Performance Information For Projects Listed Under Criterion 1 May Be Given Greater Weight.submission Requirements: Submit A Completed Cpars/acass Evaluation For Each Project Under Criterion 1. If A Completed Cpars/acass Evaluation Is Not Available, The Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq), Attachment (a), Included In This Notice, Is Provided For The Firm Or Its Team Members To Submit To The Client For Each Project Included Under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. Do Not Submit A Ppq When A Completed Cpars/acass Is Available. If A Cpars/acass Evaluation Is Not Available, Completed Ppqs Should Be Submitted With Your Sf330. If The Firm Is Unable To Obtain A Completed Ppq From A Client For A Project(s) Before The Response Date Set Forth In This Notice, Firms Should Complete And Submit With Their Responses The First Page Of The Ppq, Attachment (a), Which Provides Contract And Client Information For The Respective Project(s). Firms May Submit A Ppq Previously Submitted Under A Different Notice/rfp (legible Copies Are Acceptable) If It Is On The Same Or Similar Form As Posted With This Synopsis. Firms Should Follow Up With Clients/references To Ensure Timely Submittal Of Questionnaires. If Requested By The Client, Questionnaires May Be Submitted Directly To The Governments Point Of Contact Via Email To:grace Montero: grace.e.montero.civ@us.navy.mil With A Copy Tonancy Coffee: nancy.m.coffee.civ@us.navy.mil Firms Shall Not Incorporate By Reference Into Their Response Ppqs Or Cpars Previously Submitted In Response To Other A/e Services Procurements. However, This Does Not Preclude The Government From Utilizing Previously Submitted Ppq Information In The Past Performance Evaluation. Firms Shall Provide Any Information On Problems Encountered And The Corrective Actions Taken On Projects Submitted Under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience And Sustainable Design. Firms Shall Also Address Any Adverse Past Performance Issues. Information Discussing Corrective Actions Or Adverse Past Performance Information Shall Not Exceed Two Double-sided Pages (or Four Single-sided Pages) In Total.awards, Letters Of Commendation, Certificates Of Appreciation, Etc. Shall Not Be Submitted And Will Not Be Considered In The Evaluation.criterion 4 ? Quality Control Program (sf330, Part I, Section H):firms Will Be Evaluated On The Strength Of The Quality Control Program Proposed By The Firm To Ensure Quality Products And Services Under This Contract And Means Of Ensuring Quality Services From Their Consultants/subcontractors.submission Requirements: Describe The Quality Control Program That Will Be Utilized For All Deliverables Of This Contract And The Management Approach For Quality Control Processes And Procedures. The Description Shall:1. explain The Quality Control Program Including An Example Of How The Plan Has Worked For One Of The Projects Submitted As Part Of Sf330, Section F Or How The Plan Will Work If It Has Not Been Used Previously. 2. provide A Quality Control Process Chart Showing The Inter-relationship Of The Management And Team Components.3. describe Specific Quality Control Processes And Procedures Proposed For This Contract Including Technical Accuracy Of And Assurance Of Overall Coordination Of Plans And Specifications, Field Verification Of Record Drawings And Existing Conditions Prior To Design, And Engineering And Design Services. 4. identify The Quality Control Manager And Any Other Key Personnel Responsible For The Quality Control Program And A Description Of Their Roles And Responsibilities.5. describe How The Firms Quality Control Program Extends To Management Of Subcontractors.criterion 5?program Management And Capacity (sf330, Part I, Section H): Firms Will Be Evaluated On The Firms Ability To Plan For And Manage Work Under The Contract And Demonstrated Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. Submission Requirements: 1. provide An Organizational Chart For The Team And Discuss The Management Plan For This Contract And Personnel Roles In The Organization. 2. describe The Ability Of The Firm To Manage, Coordinate And Work Effectively With Team Members, Both Internal Staff And Consultants. Discuss The History Of Working Relationships With Team Members, Including Joint Venture Partners Where Applicable. 3. describe The Firms Present Workload And The Availability Of The Project Team (including Consultants) For The Specified Contract Performance Period. Describe The Workload/availability Of The Key Personnel During The Anticipated Contract Performance Period And The Ability Of The Firm To Provide Qualified Backup Staffing For Key Personnel To Ensure Continuity Of Services. General Statements Of Availability/capacity May Be Considered Less Favorably. Criterion 6? Location (sf330, Part I, Section H): Provide The Location Of The Office(s) That Will Be Performing The Work, Including Main Offices, Branch Offices, And Offices Of Team Members And The Locations Of Their Office(s) That Will Be Performing The Work Under This Contract With Demonstrated Knowledge Of The Primary Geographic Areas In Which Projects Could Be Located. Provide A Narrative Describing The Teams Knowledge Of The Primary Geographic Areas In Which Projects May Be Located And The Ability Of The Prime A-e To Respond To Urgent Site Visits Within 24 Hours Of Notification. The Individual(s) Responding Must Possess Authority To Negotiate And Bind The Prime Contractor. Evaluation Of Firms Will Include Consideration Of The Teams Knowledge Of The Primary Geographic Area Of The Anticipated Projects, Primarily The Navfac Northwest Aor.criterion 7?commitment To Small Business (sf330, Part I, Section H): Firms Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of The Extent To Which They Have Identified And Committed To Small Business (sb), Small Disadvantaged Business (sdb), Women-owned Small Business (wosb), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (hubzone Sb), Veteran-owned Small Business (vosb), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb), And If Applicable, Historically Black Colleges Or Universities And Minority Institutions (hbcu/mi) In Performance Of This Contract, Whether As A Joint Venture, Teaming Arrangement, Or Subcontractor. The Government Will Evaluate Proposals Based On: (a) Past Performance In Utilization Of Small Business Concerns, And (b) Participation Of Small Business Concerns For This Requirement. In Support Of (a), All Firms Shall Provide Historical Data On Utilization Of Sb, Sdb, Wosb, Hubzone Sb, Vosb, Sdvosb And Hbcu/mi. Large Businesses Shall Submit Three Final Or Most Recent Individual Subcontracting Reports (isrs) For Similar Contracts Of Relative Size Which Show Compliance With Utilizing The Various Types Of Small Business Firms Noted Above. If Isrs Are Not Final Or Most Recent They Will Not Be Considered. If Subcontracting Goals Were Not Met, Provide An Explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports Were Not Applicable To The Similar Contracts Noted, Large Businesses Shall Submit Other Documentation Which Shows Their Utilization Of The Various Types Of Small Business Firms For The Contracts. Small Businesses Shall Also Submit Documentation Which Shows Their Utilization Of The Various Types Of Small Business Firms For Similar Contracts Of Relative Size. In Support Of (b), Large Businesses Shall Submit A Draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan, In Which They Will Be Evaluated On The Extent To Which They Identify And Commit To The Published Small Businesssubcontracting Program. The Secretary Of The Navy Has Assigned The Naval Facilities Engineering Command Goals For Fy2024 In Terms Of Percentages Of Total Planned Subcontracting Dollars For Utilization Of Small Businesses. Demonstrate The Plan To Meet These Goals:program fy24 Subcontracting Targetssmall Business (sb) 40%hubzone Small Business (hubzone Sb) 3%small Disadvantaged Business (sdb) 5%service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) 5%woman Owned Small Business (wosb) 5%veteran-owned Small Business (vosb) 5%if A Large Business Firm Is Selected For Award, A Small Business Subcontracting Plan, In Accordance With Far 19.7 And Dfar 219.7, Will Be Required And Incorporated Into The Contract Award. A Draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan Is Not Required From Small Businesses; However, Small Businesses Shall Submit Similar Information On The Extent To Which They Identify And Commit To Subcontracting To Large Business (lb), Sb, Sdb, Wosb, Hubzone Sb, Vosb, Sdvosb, And Hbcu/mi If Applicable In The Performance Of This Contract.the Small Business Size Standard Classification Is Naics 541330, Engineering Services, Size Standard $22.5m.the Attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (attachment (b)) Shall Be Used By Large Businesses To Complete The Draft Subcontracting Plan. Firms Shall Submit Their Draft Small Business Subcontracting Plans Utilizing This Template, And Only This Template.criterion 8 ? Volume Of Work (sf330, Part 1, Section H) Firms Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With Dod Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (dfars) Procedures, Guidance And Information (pgi) 236.602-1, From Data Extracted From The Federal Procurement Data System (fpds). Firms Will Be Evaluated In Terms Of Work Previously Awarded To The Firm By Dod Within The Past Twelve Months With The Objective Of Effecting An Equitable Distribution Of Contracts Among Qualified A-e Firms Including Small, Disadvantaged Business Firms, And Firms That Have Not Had Prior Dod A-e Contracts.submission Requirements: Firms Do Not Submit Data For This Factor.sf330 Submission Requirements:architect-engineer Firms Desiring To Be Considered For This Contract Must Submit A Completed Sf-330 Package. The Sf-330 Shall Be Typed, One-sided, At Least 11-point Times New Roman Or Larger. Part I Shall Not Exceed 75 Single-sided 8.5 By 11 Inch Pages (the Page Limit Does Not Include Isrs, Certificates, Ppqs, Licenses, Or The Draft Subcontracting Plan, As Required By The Small Business Subcontracting Criterion, Nor Does The Page Limit Include Cover Sheets, Dividers, Or Other Requested Documentation (e.g., Joint Venture Agreement, Proof Of Ae Firm Registration) Provided That These Do Not Contain Any Substantive Information Submitted In Response To The Synopsis Or Intended To Demonstrate The Qualifications Of The Firm). Part I Pages Shall Be Numbered Sequentially. The Organizational Chart May Be One Page Single Sided 11 By 17 Foldout, Using 11-point Font Or Larger (font Limitations Do Not Apply To Graphics, Captions Or Tables). Please Include Your Unique Entity Identifier, Cage And Tin Numbers In Block 30 Of The Sf-330.in Accordance With The Far 36.601-4(b), Contracts For Architect-engineer Services May Only Be Awarded To Firms Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering. Firms Must Submit Proof That They Are Permitted By Law As Required By Far 36.601-4(b). If A Firm Is In A Jurisdiction That Requires Ae Firm Registration, The Firm Must Provide Proof Of Registration. If A Firm Is In A Jurisdiction That Does Not Require Ae Firm Registration, The Firm Must Provide Proof Eligibility To Practice (e.g., A Summary Explaining Eligibility Under The Laws Of That Jurisdiction. Failure To Submit The Required Proof Could Result In A Firms Elimination From Consideration.firms Who Are Offering As A Joint Venture Shall Include With Their Sf330 Submission A Copy Of The Joint Venture Agreement. Failure To Include The Joint Venture Agreement May Result In The Firms Elimination From Further Evaluation.interested Parties Must Be Registered In System Of Award Management (sam) At Time Of Offer Submission And Must Remain Valid Through Award. If Sam Registration Lapses During The Solicitation And Evaluation Period, The Offer Will No Longer Be Eligible For Award. For Instructions On Registering In Sam, The Sam Website At Https://www.sam.gov. *offer Submission Is Defined As The Selected Firms Submission Of Rates. If Sam Registration Is Not Complete By The Time The Government Requests Submission Rates, The Government May Proceed To The Next Slated Firm To Negotiate And Award A Contract.vets 4212 Federal Contract Reporting. The Selected Firm Must Be Current With Dol Vets 4212 Reporting Requirements If Current Awards Are $150,000 And Above. For Vets 4212 Requirements See Https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212.the Selected Firm Must Be Determined To Be Responsible In Accordance With Far Part 9.104-1 And May Be Requested To Provide Additional Documentation In Support Of An Affirmative Determination Of Responsibility.architect-engineer Firms That Meet The Requirements Described In This Announcement Are Invited To Submit An Electronic Sf-330 To Naval Facilities Engineering Command Nw. This Is Not A Request For Proposal.if An Sf 254/sf 255 Is Submitted For This Solicitation, It Will Not Be Reviewed Or Considered. As Required Above, Provide Verifiable Evidence That Your Firm Is Permitted By Law To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering (e.g., State Registration Number).hand-carried Or Mailed Sf-330s Will Not Be Accepted. Electronic Submissions Can Be No Larger Than 1.9 Gb Per File. Offerors Shall Ensure That The Government Has Received The Electronic Proposal Prior To The Date And Time Specified. Piee Solicitation Vendor Access Instructions Are Provided Via Enclosure 1. Emailed Submissions Will Not Be Accepted.submission Of Sf330s Will Be Via Solicitation Module Available Within Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (piee) At Https://wawf.eb.mil/piee-landing/. Instructions For Obtaining Access To And Using The Solicitation Module Will Be Provided In The A-e Synopsis.inquiries Concerning This Procurement Should Include Solicitation Number And Title And Be Forwarded Via Email: Grace Montero: grace.e.montero.civ@us.navy.mil With A Copy Tonancy Coffee: nancy.m.coffee.civ@us.navy.mil Submission Deadline Statements Of Qualifications Are Due No Later Than: 12:00 P.m. Pacific Standard Time (pst) On Monday, January 27, 2025.late Responses Will Be Handled In Accordance With Far 52.215-1 Instructions To Offerors-competitive Acquisition.this Is Not A Request For Proposal.

Details: This Pre-solicitation Notice Is Not A Request For Proposal. All information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Are Contained herein. No Additional Solicitation Package Or Technical information Will Be Issued. project: 544-25-125 Replace Dental Vacuum System work Location: Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn Va Medical Center, Columbia, Sc 29209 estimated/target Completion Period: 145 Calendar Days After Award. construction Magnitude: Between $100,000 And $250,000. naics: 541330 - Engineering Services small Business Standard: $25.5 Million set-aside: 100% Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business (sdvosb) site Visits Will Not Be Arranged During This Phase. the Anticipated Award Date Of The Proposed A-e Contract Is On Or Before September 30, 2025. sf 330 Date Of Receipt/due Date: Interested Firms Having The Capabilities To Perform This Work Must Submit One (1) Electronic Sf 330 And Attachments (if Any) No Later Than (nlt) 12:00 Pm (est) January 13, 2025. ***attention*** Acknowledgement E-mails Will Be Sent From The Co Upon Receipt Of A Submission. If An Acknowledgement Is Not Returned, The Firm Should Contact The Co At Christopher.jenkins@va.gov And 478-595-2794. project Overview: the Columbia Va Health Care System Requires A Designed Solution To Repair Or Replace The Dental Vacuum System To Include All Piping, Pumps, Vacuums, Filters, Separators, Valving, Motors, Starters, Controllers, And All Other Necessary Components To Provide A Completely New System. The Current System Is Not Functioning Properly And Believed To Be Caused By The Current Configuration, Component Locations, And Length Of Installed Vacuum Piping. the End Result Of The Contract Is A Complete Set Of Construction Documents To Repair Or Replace The Existing Dental Vacuum System That Are Prepared For Solicitation For Construction. sdvosb Set-aside: this Requirement Is A 100% Set-aside For Service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses Under The Authority Of 38 U.s.c. 8127(d). To Be Eligible For Award The Sdvosb You Must Be Considered Small Under The Relevant Naics Code. Sdvosb Contractors Must Be Verified And Viewable In Sba Vetcert: Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/ Prior To Submission Of Proposal And Prior To Award Of Contract With Vaar 804.1103-70. Status As A Qualified Sdvosb Concern Is Under The Authority Of 38 Cfr Part 74 In Accordance With The Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 819. Any Person, Persons, Or Business Entity Suspected Of Misrepresenting Itself For The Purpose Of Securing A Government Contract May Be Criminally Investigated And Prosecuted For Fraud Against The United States Of America. Parties Found Misrepresenting Their Status Also Risk Debarment From Further Government Contracts. Eligibility Determination Is Performed By The Center For Veterans Enterprise (cve). Eligible Sdvosb Concerns Must Also Be Registered At The Following Websites: system For Award Management (sam): Https://www.sam.gov vets-4212 Federal Contractor Reporting Https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212 important Notice: Prior To Submitting A Proposal Under This Sdvosb Set- Aside Solicitation; Offerors Must Apply For And Receive Verification From The Department Of Veteran Affairs Center For Veterans Enterprise (cve) In Accordance With 38 Cfr Part 74 And Vaar 819.70 By Submission Of Documentation Of Veteran Status, Ownership And Control Sufficient To Establish Appropriate Status. All Offerors Are Urged To Contact The Cve And Submit The Aforementioned Required Documents To Obtain Cve Verification Of Their Sdvosb Status If They Have Not Already Done So. for A Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) To Be Considered As A Prospective Contractor, The Firm, Including Joint Ventures, Must Be Verified And Registered In The Department Of Veteran Affairs (va) Office Of Small & Disadvantaged Business Utilization (osdbu) Sba Vetcert: Https://veterans.certify.sba.gov/ And Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) At Time Of Submission Of Their Qualifications. Failure Of A Prospective Sdvosb To Be Verified By The Center For Veterans Enterprise (cve) At The Time The Sf 330 Is Submitted Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration. All Joint Ventures Must Be Cve Verified At Time Of Submission And Submit Agreements That Comply With 13cfr 125.15 Prior To contract Award. in Order To Assure Compliance With Far Clauses, 52.219-14 Limitations On subcontracting (deviation 2019-01) And Vaar 852.219-10, Va Notice Of Total service-disabled Veteran-owned Small Business Set-aside (jul 2019) (deviation), All Firms Submitting A Sf 330 For This Pre-solicitation Notice Are required To Indicate What Percentage Of The Cost Of Contract Performance Will Be Expended On The Concerns Employees And In Which Discipline(s) And Percentage Of Cost Of Contract Performance To Be Expended (and In What Disciplines) By Any Other Consultant/subcontractor Or Otherwise Used Small Or Large Business Entity(s). Any Consultant/subcontractor Or Otherwise Business Entity(s) Used Must Be Identified By Name, Office Location And Size/type Of Business (i.e. Sdvosb, Vosb, 8(a), Small, Large, Etc.). Failure To Provide This Information Will Deem The Firm S Sf 330 Submittal As Nonresponsive And Preclude Further Evaluation. far Part 36.6 (brooks Act) Selection Procedures Apply. The A-e Services Listed Herein Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act (public Law 92-582) As Implemented In Far 36.6 And Vaar 836.6. Pursuant To Far, The Firm Responding To This Requirement Must Be Permitted, By Law, To Practice The Professions Of Architecture Or Engineering And Meet All Required Qualifications For The State Of Georgia. sf330s Shall Be Organized In The Following Order: cover Sheet (one-page Limit) design Team Background With Locations Of Supporting Offices (one-page Limit) design Team Organizational Structure With Key Discipline Roles (one-page Limit) factor 1 Specialized Experience (one Page Per Project Limit) factor 2 - Professional Qualifications (one Page Per Resume Limit) factor 3 Past Performance Summary Sheet (one-page Limit) factor 4 - Capacity (one-page Limit) factor 5 Knowledge Or Location (one-page Limit) factor 6 Sdvosb Inclusion Statement (one-page Limit) full Cpars/ppqs Documentation For Factor 1 Projects (20-page Limit) additional Information (10-page Limit) sf330s Received Out Of Sequence Will Be Viewed Negatively. sf330 Specific Requirements: all Sf330 Pages Shall Be Pdf Searchable For Items 1 Through 11 And Item 13. Full Cpars And Ppqs May Be Scanned. start Each Factor Response On A New Page. use No Less Than 11-point Font. all Text And Images Containing Text Is Legible When Printed On 8.5 X 11 Paper. The Evaluation Board Will Not Seek Clarification Regarding Illegible Text. primary Selection Criteria (listed In Descending Order Of Importance): factor 1 specialized Experience (sections F, G And H): Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Design And Construction Period Services Will Be Required To Perform Throughout The Life Of The Contract. Projects Experience Pertains To The Types, Size, Recency, Cost, And Complexity Of Work Previously Or Currently Being Performed By The Offeror That Is Comparable To The Work Covered By This Solicitation. page Limit One Page Per Project. Five-page Total For Factor 1. Information Provided On Additional Pages Beyond The One Page Per Project Limit Or Beyond The Five-page Total Limit Will Not Be Included With The Review. relevant Project Experience: Submit Five (3) Projects That Meet All Criteria Shown Below. relevant Project Type Design-bid-build Projects Involving Site Investigation, Schematic Design, Design Development, And Construction Documents. Dental Vacuum System Replacements, Renovations Of Dental Clinics That Include New Dental Vacuum Systems, And New Building Construction That Include New Dental Vacuum Systems Are Acceptable Project Types. Masterplan And Rfp Development For Design-build Contracts Will Not Be Viewed As Relevant. relevant Project Size Systems Service Five Dental Chairs Or More. relevant Project Recency Project Construction Must Be Complete Or Substantially Complete Within The Past Five Years Of The Solicitation Due Date. Substantially Complete Is Defined As 80% Or Greater Of The Construction Project Is Complete At The Time Of The Solicitation Due Date. relevant Project Cost - Construction Project Cost Must Be Greater Than $75,000 relevant Project Complexity The Project Narrative Description Must Indicate Experience With All The Following Criteria: designing Main Vacuum Systems That Include Amalgam Separators For Dental Service Lines. designing Infection Control Risk Mitigation Plans designing New Pump/vacuum Drive And Controller System the Relevant Project Criteria Listed Above Is The Minimal Information Required For Acceptable Project Relevance. Additional Value Will Be Considered For Projects Which Convey Expertise With The Following Categories And Will Potentially Increase The Overall Rating For This Factor. Projects That Do Not Convey Additional Value Expertise Will Not Be Considered A Weakness. Additional Value Expertise Includes: experience With The Submitting Firm Serving As The Prime Contractor Leading A Multi-discipline Team Through Investigative, Design, Solicitation, And Construction Period Services. These Services Must Be Documented For Each Project Narrative. designing Hazardous Material Abatement Plans experience With Recent Projects Intended To Support Service Line Dental Service Lines. va Projects Showing Documented Experience With Implementing Va Design Guides And Standards From The Technical Information Library. experience With Recent Projects Located In The Columbia, Sc, South Carolina Midlands Area, Or Adjacent Counties. experience With Recent Projects That Include Implementing Va Cad And Bim Standards. submissions Shall Include No More And No Less Than Three (3) Type Projects Of Recent And Relevant Government And Private Experience Projects Similar In Type, Size, Recency, And Complexity, Cost, And Experience With The Type Of Projects/competence Above. section G Will Used To Evaluate The Prior Experience Of The Prime Firm And Any Key Subcontractors Working Together As A Cohesive Unit On The Provided Relevant Projects. An Acceptable Rating Will Be Given If All Key Disciplines Are Shown, And Each Discipline Participated With At Least One Project Listed On Section G. Proposed Design Team Members That Do Not Have Experience With Any Of The Five Submitted Example Projects As Shown In Section G Will Be Viewed Negatively. factor 2 professional Qualifications (sections C Through E) Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Service. The Ae Shall Demonstrate They Are Able To Sign And Stamp Each Drawing By Individuals Licensed In Any State In The United States For The Key Positions Listed Below. The Design Firm And A-e Staff Representing The Project Must Be Licensed To Practice In Any State Of The United States Of America. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm As Full-time Employees) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project, And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team When Evaluating Professional Qualifications. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered To Sign Drawings In Each Discipline Must But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The State Where The Project Is Located. The Licensed Professional Must Hold Current Licensure For Said Discipline To Practice In Any State Of The United States Of America. Engineer-in -training (eit) Is Not Considered A Professional Licensure. page Limit One Page Limit Per Position Resume 8 Pages Total For Factor 2. Information Provided On Additional Pages Beyond The 8-page Limit Will Not Be Included With The Review. resume Requirements - A Resume For Each Of These Key Positions Must Be Provided Identifying Their Specific Role, Via Section E In The Sf330. Key Positions And Disciplines Required For This Project Include, But Are Not Limited To, The Lists Of Professionals With Required Licensure And Preferred Licensure Below. An Unacceptable Rating May Be Given If Resumes Are Not Provided For All Roles Listed. positions Requiring Professional Licensure. Not Providing The Professional Licensure Will Be Viewed Negatively And Will Not Be Compliant With The Solicitation. architect mechanical Engineer electrical Engineer fire Protection Engineer plumbing Engineer key Positions With Preferred Qualifications. Design Team Professionals That Have Obtained The Indicated Preferred Licensure May Be Viewed More Favorably. Not Providing The Professional Licensure Will Not Be Viewed Negatively And Will Not Reduce The Overall Rating For This Factor. Higher Value Will Be Given For Professionals With The Preferred Professional Licensure. quality Control Manager - Either Cqm, Cqe, Lean Six Sigma Black Belt, Or Experience With Minimum Five Projects Were Served As Qc Manager. project Manager - Project Management Professional (pmp) Certification Or More Than 10 Years Experience With Managing A/e Design Projects. construction Cost Estimator - Aspe Certified Professional Estimator (cpe) Certification multi-function Roles Are Allowable For The Following Positions And May Be Shown As Multi-role Positions On The Resumes: mechanical And Plumbing Engineering. architect, Seps Manager, Bim Manager, Interior Designer electrical Engineer And Rcdd project Manager And Quality Control Manager include The Home Office Location For Each Key Discipline Identified On Each Respective Resume In Section E Block 15. the Criteria Listed Above Is The Minimal Information Required For Acceptable Professional Qualifications. Additional Value Will Be Considered For Each Key Position And Will Potentially Increase The Overall Rating For This Factor And Shall Not Exceed The Prescribed Page Limit. key Personnel Having Greater Than 10 Years Experience In The Practicing Field. key Personnel With Greater Than Five Years Employment With The Proposed Design Team Firm. va Design And Construction Experience Within The Past Five Years. any Other Information The Design Team Wishes To Include For This Factor So Long As The Page Limit Is Not Exceeded. factor 3 past Performance (section H): Past Performance Will Be Evaluated On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules Along With The Firm S History Of Design Error, Omission, And/or Deficiency Claims. past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Database Will Be Reviewed To Evaluate The Projects That Have A Va Cpars Entry. Va Cpars Are Not Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330 Submission. However, If The Va Cpars Is Not Included With The Sf330 Submission, Then The Contract Number For The Project Must Be Submitted For Each Project Provided In Section F So Cpars Can Be Reviewed In The Database. Please Note We Are Unable To Review Any Cpars From Other Federal Agencies, Outside Of The Va. for Any Project That Does Not Have Va Cpars Data Available, A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) Is Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330. If The Firm (prime Or Subcontractor) Was Not The Prime Contractor On Any Project Submit-ted In The Sf330 A Ppq Must Be Provided Listing Their Specific Role As A Subcontractor. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. In The Event That A Firm Does Not Receive A Requested Complete Ppq From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title/contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. the Government May Also Consider Additional Performance Related Information Regarding The Firm, To Include Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. If Appropriate, The Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services May Be Evaluated. failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Will Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. for Ppqs, Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document. Completed Ppqs Should Be Incorporated Into The Sf 330 Directly. Ppqs Should Not Be Submitted To The Vha Pcac Directly. Any Cpars And Ppqs Will Not Be Counted Towards The Page Limitations For This Submission. However, Any Narratives Provided For Past Performance In Section H Will Be Counted Toward The Page Limit. page Limit Provide No More Than One Page Total For This Factor For The Summary Page. Full Cpars/ppq Documentation Shall Be Included On Additional Pages With The Sf330 And Will Not Count Towards The Total Page Count. provide A Summary Page That Provides The Factor S Required Information. For Each Of The Five Projects, Provide The Following Information. project Information (each Project For Specialized Experience) past Performance Record Type (ppq Or Cpars) contract Number point Of Contact (name, Phone, Email, Job Title, Poc Role) ae Firm Role With Project (prime Or Subcontractor) category Ratings provide Complete Cpars (or Ppqs If Cpars Is Not Available) For All Sample Projects After The Sf330 Factor 8 Section. the Criteria Listed Above Is The Minimal Information Required For Acceptable Factor Compliance. Additional Value Will Be Considered For Each Additional Item Below And May Potentially Increase The Overall Rating For This Factor. Locate This Documentation After The Complete Cpars/ppq Documents. Additional Value Documentation Shall Not Exceed Five Pages. letters Of Appreciation Or Accolades From Previous Projects industry Recognition Or Design Awards any Other Information The Design Team Wishes To Include For This Factor So Long As The Five-page Limit Is Not Exceeded. factor 4 capacity (section H): The Evaluation Will Consider The Firm S Ability To Meet The Schedule Of The Overall Project, As Well As The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time. Provide The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines By Providing Current Project Workload, Inclusive Of All Projects Awarded By The Va, Any Federal Agency, And Private Sector During The Previous Twelve (12) Months And The Full Potential Value Of Projects Forecasted Within The Next Twenty-four (24) Months Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts That The Firm Has. Include The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts. Offeror Shall Clearly State Their Available Capacity Presenting Workload Percentages For The Key Disciplines And/or Team Members, Including Sub-consultants. Also, The Offeror Must Provide The Completion Percentages And Expected Completion Date For All The Va Projects Current And Forecasted. Awarded In The Previous 12 Months. Please Ensure The Capacity Applies Toward The Team/personnel Provided In The Sf330. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf330. page Limit Provide No More Than Two Pages Total For This Factor. Information Provided On Additional Pages Beyond The One-page Limit Will Not Be Included With The Review. include A Table That Conveys Each Key Discipline, Quantity Of Current Design Project Workload, Quantity Of Current Construction Period Service Workload, Estimated Future Design Load, Estimated Future Construction Workload, Quantity Of Current Idiq Contracts, Total Idiq Contract Capacity, Total Remaining Idiq Capacity, And Percent The Key Discipline Is Available. For Example: key Discipline total # Of Current Design Project Workload # Of Current Construction Project Workload estimated # Of Future Design Project Workload estimated # Of Future Construction Project Workload quantity Of Current Idiq Contracts Involved With total Idiq Capacity All Contracts (millions) total Idiq Remaining Capacity (millions) percent Available capacity architect 6 7 6 7 4 $1m $2m 45% mechanical Engineer 4 8 3 8 2 $1m $1 10% add Disciplines As Required the Criteria Listed Above Is The Minimal Information Required For Acceptable Factor Compliance. Additional Value Will Be Considered For Each Additional Item Below And May Potentially Increase The Overall Rating For This Factor. Do Not Include Additional Pages In The Additional Information Section. providing A Narrative Conveying The Design Team S Approach On How New Work Will Merge With The Current Workload. provide A Narrative Describing The Process Regarding Replacement Of Key Disciplines Should One Decide To Leave The Design Team. convey How The Design Team Can Maintain Schedule If A Key Discipline Member Is No Longer Available? any Other Information The Design Team Wishes To Include For This Factor So Long As The Page Limit Is Not Exceeded. factor 5 knowledge Of Locality (section H). Knowledge Of The Locality, To Include Specific Knowledge Of Certain Local Conditions Or Project Site Features, Such As Geological Features, Climatic Conditions, Working With And Local Construction Methods Or Local Laws And Regulations. The Information For This Factor Shall Be Provided In Section H Of The Sf 330. note That The Intent Of This Factor Is To Showcase A Firm S Understanding Of The Site And Locality, And Not Where The Firm Is Located, How Far Away The Firm/branch Office Is From The Site, And How They Would Travel To The Site. page Limit Page Limit Provide No More Than One Page Total For This Factor. Information Provided On Additional Pages Beyond The One-page Limit Will Not Be Included With The Review. provide An Individual Narrative Conveying Knowledge Of The Locality For Each Of The Following Categories: local Conditions Or Project Site Features climatic Conditions geologic Features working With And Local Construction Methods working With Local Laws And Regulations the Criteria Listed Above Is The Minimal Information Required For Acceptable Factor Compliance. Additional Value Will Be Considered For Each Additional Item Below And May Potentially Increase The Overall Rating For This Factor So Long As The Page Limit Is Not Exceeded. Do Not Include Additional Pages In The Additional Information Section. experience With Seismic Designs Applicable To The Columbia, Sc Area. any Other Information The Design Team Wishes To Include For This Factor So Long As The Page Limit Is Not Exceeded. factor 6 use Of Service- Disabled Veteran-owned Small Businesses, Veteran-owned Small Businesses, And Other Types Of Small Businesses As Subcontractors. Offerors Shall Be Evaluated Based On Their Utilization Plans For Service- Disabled Veteran- Owned Small Businesses (sdvosbs), Veteran-owned Small Businesses (vosbs), Or Other Types Of Small Businesses. Offerors Shall Submit Qualifications For Proposed Consultants Per Other Criteria In This Solicitation. page Limit Page Limit Provide No More Than One Page Total For This Factor. Information Provided On Additional Pages Beyond The One-page Limit Will Not Be Included With The Review. provide A Listing Of All Consulting Firms And Business Government Certification(s). Indicate The Anticipated Percentage Of Work The Consulting Firm Will Perform. the Criteria Listed Above Is The Minimal Information Required For Acceptable Factor Compliance. The Higher Percentage Of Certified Sdvosb Firms Included With The Design Team May Provide Additional Value And Potentially Increase The Overall Rating For This Factor So Long As The Page Limit Is Not Exceeded. Do Not Include Additional Pages In The Additional Information Section.

Details: In Aarhus Municipality, the area of the Udbudte Area is secured. This includes Fx Enablering of Ensuring And Maintaining Schools, Day Institutions, Administration Buildings, Job Centres, Heroin and Dental Clinics, But Is Not Limited Heretil. Part Agreement 1 - Dynamic Purchasing System For Anti-Dis alarms (aia) and Access Control (adk). Contracts and framework agreements within the following, but are not limited to: — Delivery And Mounting Alarms, Samt Subsequent Servicering — Automatic Door Control (adk) — New Electronic Lock Systems. Part Agreement 2 - Dynamic Shop System For Brand. Contracts and Framework Agreements Within Fire Protection, For example, but not limited to: — Assembly and Delivery of New Abatry Subsequent Servicering — Sprinklers. Part Agreement 3 - Dynamic Shop System For Tvo (tv Monitoring). Contracts and framework agreements Before Monitoring, For example, Not limited to: — Delivery And mount Samt Subsequent Maintaining TV monitoring systems. Part Agreement 4 - Dynamic Shop System For Mixed Outsourcing. Contracts and framework agreements On the Cross of Share Agreements 1-3. This Part Agreement Is Among Other For Thinking Of Total Solutions.

Details: The Rheinsberg educational campus is to be expanded and developed as a primary school location through conversion and renovation at Kiefernweg 5. The property was built in 1980-1981 as a prefabricated school (type Erfurt). It has been used continuously as a school to date. The last facade renovation took place in 1990. The building currently houses classrooms for the primary school and the day-care center. The work will be carried out during normal school operations (mostly during the holidays) and in some areas and will be calculated accordingly. The building has an outdated electrical system with various defects. The construction measures advertised are intended to replace the entire electrical installation of the building. The measures listed below can be started as early as spring 2025. These include the renewal of the main distribution board, the installation of a new fire alarm system as a house alarm, the installation of emergency lighting, the installation of an Ela system with amok alarm function and the installation of a burglar alarm system. In each classroom, a media column will be retrofitted with an Ela loudspeaker, data ports and an integrated 6-row UV, as well as the renewal of the lighting systems in the classrooms, preparation rooms, traffic areas and adjoining rooms and the installation of the structured network.

Details: Page 2 Of 2 description: This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For The Establishment Of An Architect-engineering (a-e) Contract With Services To Be Performed At The Salem Va Medical Center At 1970 Roanoke Blvd, Salem, Va 24153. This Requirement Is Being Executed Under A 100% Set-aside To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms. This Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal; No Solicitation Package Will Be Issued Until After An Evaluation Has Been Made On The Provided Sf-330s. The Sf-330 Can Be Downloaded Through The Gsa Forms Library At: Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/top, Scroll Down To Locate And Click On The Sf-330 Hyperlink Entitled, Architect-engineer Qualifications. Interested Firms Should Submit Their Current Sf-330, Parts I And Ii, To Chanel.johnson@va.gov. The Sf-330s Are Due No Later Than 9:00 Am, Est, February 18, 2025. scope Of Work: intent provide Professional Engineering Services To Include Option Analysis, Phasing Design, Investigative Surveys And Reports, Planning, Consultation And Visits, Design Work, Preparation Of Contract Drawings And Specifications, Preparation Of Cost Estimates And Provision Of Construction Period Services As Necessary For Project 658-24-109 Renovate Patient Restrooms, At Vamc Salem, Virginia. The Restrooms Identified For Renovation Shall Be Brought Up To Department Of Veterans Affairs (va) Standards And Specifications As Well As The Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility (abaa) Standards. There Are 18 Restrooms Currently Planned To Be In The Scope Of This Project. The Va Will Review The Cost Estimate At The Design Development Stage And Confirm Or Alter The List Of Restrooms. In No Case Will New Restrooms Be Added To The Scope But One Or More May Be Removed If Necessary To Meet The Available Funding.   The Project Intent Is To Develop A Complete Design Package That Addresses All Va And Abaa Requirements On Restrooms In Building 143. Restrooms To Be Brought Up To Standards Typically Require Expansion And Complete Renovation Of All Finishes And Fixtures. design Efforts Shall Include: conduct A Site Investigation Of All Identified Restrooms In Building 143. Identify Nonconformance Issues Using The Requirements Of All Applicable Va Standards And Specifications, And Of The Abaa Standards. utilizing A Rating Or Scoring System, Identify The Restrooms That Are Priority Based On Greater Nonconformity With Standards. Ratings / Scoring Shall Be Documented In A Schedule Such That The Construction Can Be Phased Accordingly. For The Design Development (60%) Submission Review, The Va Will Review The Cost Estimate Submission And Confirm Or Alter The Restrooms That Will Be In Scope. provide A Recommendation For Va Personnel To Follow Up, Regarding Requirements Of The Abaas For Wheelchair Accessible Toile Rooms In Existing Buildings. Specifically, Use F202 Existing Buildings And Facilities, Paragraph F213.2, Exception Number 4 To Determine Whether Va Policy And Requirements For Renovations May Take Advantage Of This Exception, And Recommend Methods To Comply To Include: provision Of Two Wheelchair Accessible Unisex Single Use Toilet Rooms Per Floor. Recommend Other Renovations As Needed Such As Grab Bars And Clearance Of Fixtures, For The Other Single Use Toilet Rooms On Each Floor. make A Recommendation On Whether To Provide On Each Floor One Wheelchair Accessible Unisex Single Use Toilet Room, And One Ambulatory Accessible Toilet Room Of A Lesser Minimum Square Footage. examine Whether On The First Floor, The Single Use Toilet Rooms Constitute A Cluster Of Single Use Toilet Rooms And Are Therefore Subject To A Minimum Of 50% Wheelchair Accessible. examine Potential Benefits Or Impacts On The Basement Floor Of Building 143, Where We Have Identified Five Single Use Toilet Rooms For Renovation. The Benefits To Examine Are The Expected Completion Of Four Wheelchair Accessible Toilet Rooms With More Than One Toilet (two Men S And Two Women S), Which Are Being Renovated And Brought Up To Abaas Compliance As Part Of Project# 658-24-104 Renovate Main Lobby. Specifically Make A Recommendation Whether The Completion Of Those Restroom Renovations Will Mean No Other Toilet Rooms Need Be Made Wheelchair Accessible But Only Meet Ambulatory Patient Requirements Such As Space In The Room And Clearance Of Fixtures, Provision Of Grab Bars, Etc. Examine According To The The Requirements Of F213.2 And Exception 4 But Also Any Applicable Va Policies And Standards Which Speak To The Issue. provide A Complete Design Package Which Shall Include Drawings And Construction Specifications To Renovate All Restrooms Included In The Program. In Addition To The Overall Restoration Requirements, The Following Shall Also Be Required: a/e Satisfy The Following Milestones: schematic Design (30%) drawings outline Specifications And A Draft Of The Submittal Register construction Cost Estimate design Development Review Meeting final Design Submission (95%). The Final Design Shall Be Complete, Free Of Errors And Ready In The A/e Firm S Judgment To Be Issued For Construction. The Purpose Of The Review Is A Check For Inadvertent Errors And No Further Design Is Anticipated Other Than Correction Of Errors In The Set. drawings full Specifications And The Submittal Register construction Cost Estimate design Development Review Meeting construction Documents (100%) drawings full Specifications construction Cost Estimate construction Documents Review Meeting . the A/e Shall Complete The Project Design In Accordance With This A/e Scope, With All Applicable Va Standards And Specifications, And With Abaa Standards For Toilet Rooms In Healthcare Facilities Unless Otherwise Approved By The Va. The A/e Shall Retrieve All Va Design Information And Standards From The Va Facilities Web Site (http://www.va.gov/facmgt/standard). The A/e Shall Incorporate These Documents And All National, State And Local Codes Adopted And Used By The Va In The Design Of This Project. All Applicable Standards Shall Be Reflected In The Construction Cost Estimate. The Facility Record Drawings And Autocad Files Are Available For The A/e S Use. Note: Not All Record Drawings Are Available On Autocad. Additionally, The Accuracy Of Facility Record Drawings Must Be Field Verified By The A/e. At A Minimum, The A/e Shall Utilize The Following References, As Applicable, For Planning And Design Purposes. national Cad Standards And Standard Details Pg-18-4 vha Program Guide Pg-18-3 va Master Construction Specifications Pg-18-1 h-18-8 Seismic Design Requirements sanitary Design Manual For Hospital Projects pg-18-13 Barrier Free Design Handbook nfpa Codes design Manuals Pg-18-10 cultural Resource Management D-7545 & H-7545 government-furnished Record Drawings (a/e To Field Verify Conditions) pg-18-15 A/e Submission Requirements. pg-18-12 Design Guides (graphical, By Function) pg-18-14 Room Finishes, Door, And Hardware Schedules facility Guidelines Institute (fgi) american Institute Of Architects (aia) a/e Shall Address The Following Items In The Design: estimate Of Construction Project Costs And Duration Including Simplified Schedule To Include Progress And Final Inspections And All Work Required For The Base Bid And The Bid Alternatives. Revise Cost Estimates And Schedules For Each Design Submittal. access To Buildings Must Remain Adequately Operational And Completely Protected During Site Investigations And Shall Be Phased To Minimize Impacts To Patients During The Construction Process. contractor Shall Comply With All Applicable Records Management Laws And Regulations, As Well As National Archives And Records Administration (nara) Records Policies, Including But Not Limited To The Federal Records Act (44 U.s.c. Chs. 21, 29, 31, 33), Nara Regulations At 36 Cfr Chapter Xii Subchapter B, And Those Policies Associated With The Safeguarding Of Records Covered By The Privacy Act Of 1974 (5 U.s.c. 552a). These Policies Include The Preservation Of All Records, Regardless Of Form Or Characteristics, Mode Of Transmission, Or State Of Completion. the A/e Has Responsibility For Duty To Report Any Fraud, Waste And Abuse Witnessed While On Va Premises To The Integrity And Compliance Officer. the Following Quantities Of Design Review Material Are Required For The Schematic Design, Design Development, Final Design, And Construction Document Submissions: one (1) Full Size, One (1) Half Size, And One (1) Electronic Set (pdf And Autocad 2022 Format) Of The Design Drawings. two (2) Paper Copies And One (1) Electronic Copy (ms Word) Of Sample Edited And Marked-up (track Changes Enabled) Va Master Specifications. two (2) Hardcopy Sets And One (1) Electronic Set Of Final Engineering Calculations. provide Two (2) Hard Copies And One (1) Electronic Copy Each Of The Budgetary Cost Estimate And Preliminary Schedule. in Addition To Those Items Listed Above In Item 5, For The Construction Document Submission The Following Quantities Of Review Materials Are Required. This Submission Shall Include Severable Components And The Overall Project As Described Above: brief Description Of Work For Inclusion In Ifb (microsoft Word), Including Descriptions Of Deductive Alternates And Associated Completion Times. list Of Sole Source Items With Justification (if Applicable). list Of Or-equal Items With Justification (if Applicable). schedule: overall Period Of Performance: 210 Days From The Notice To Proceed. site Investigation Report Is Due 45 Calendar Days From The Notice To Proceed. schematic Design (30%) Submission Is Due 45 Calendar Days From The Receipt Of The Site Investigation Report the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. design Development (60%) Submission Is Due 30 Calendar Days From The Date Schematic Design Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. final Design (95%) Submission Is Due 30 Calendar Days From The Date Design Development Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. construction Documents Submission Is Due 15 Calendar Days From The Date Full Design Review Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Accept The Construction Documents Within Five Calendar Days Of Receipt, Or Will Require Re-submission Of The Construction Documents If There Are Remaining Comments That Have Not Been Adequately Addressed. any Delays To The Schedule Due To Re-submissions That May Be Required Upon Government Review, Is The Responsibility Of The A/e And Shall Not Result In A Claim For Delay. evaluation Factors For Award the Government Will Award A Contract Resulting From This Solicitation To The Responsible Offeror Whose Offer Conforming To The Solicitation Will Be Most Advantageous To The Government, And Other Factors Considered. Boards Will Evaluate Firms' Qualifications Strictly On The Basis Of The Announced Selection Criteria And Their Stated Order Of Importance. The Criteria Will Be Applied As Follows: part I Technical Capability the Following Criteria Will Be Used To By A Selection Board To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms In Respect To Their Technical Capability. Technical Capability Will Be Evaluated Based On The Following Factors: specialized Experience And Technical Competence (far 36.602-1(a)(2)). Offerors Will Be Evaluated Based On The Specialized Experience Of A Firm On Similar Projects And The Technical Capabilities (such As Design Quality Management Procedures, Cadd/bim, And Equipment Resources,) Of The Prime Firm And Any Subcontractors. Evaluation Will Be Based On The Information Presented In The Architect-engineer Qualifications - Standard Form 330 (sf330). A Maximum Of Five (5) Example Projects May Be Submitted For Consideration Under Sf330, Part I, Section F. Example Projects Should Be Designs Completed Within Six (6) Years Of Solicitation Closing Date. professional Qualifications (far 36.602-1(a)(1)). A Board Will Evaluate, As appropriate, The Education, Training, Registration, Certifications (see Paragraph 3-4.d(4)), Overall And Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm Of The Key Management And Technical Personnel. This Criterion Is Primarily Concerned With The Qualifications Of The Key Personnel And Not The Number Of Personnel, Which Is Addressed Under The Capacity Criterion. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered As Required By Far 36.609-4 And 52.236-25 But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. capacity (far 36.602-1(a)(3)). A Firm S Capacity Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Experience With Similar Size Projects, The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time, And A Primary Design Schedule. The Volume Of Work Awarded During The Previous 12 Months, Based On Data Extracted From The Federal Procurement Data System, Will Be Considered When Evaluating Capacity. Additionally, The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts That A Firm Has Been Awarded Will Be Considered When Evaluating Capacity. knowledge Of The Locality (far 36.602-1(a)(5)). Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Knowledge Of The Locality Such As Knowledge Of Local Historical Features, Climatic Conditions, And Local Construction Methods That Are Unusual Or Unique To The Area. design Quality Control Plan. Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Approach To Ensure Technical Quality And Accuracy Of Work Products. A Firm's Approach To Resolve Issues Of Quality Will Be Analyzed To Determine Its Ability To Provide Quality Design Products. Describe And Define The Processes Of The Firm's Quality Control Plan And List, By Name And Position, All Key Personnel Responsible For Its Execution. Quality Control Information Shall Also Address Safety Measures Particularly With Respect To Field Work And Site Investigations. Information Describing Quality Management May Be Presented In Sf330, Part I, Section H. A Design Quality Control Plan Shall Be Submitted As Part Of The Proposal. experience In Construction Period Services. Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Experience In Providing Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During Construction, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Request For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Preparing Cost Estimates. part Ii Past Performance the Following Criteria Will Be Used To By A Selection Board To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms Based On A Firm S Past Performance. past Performance (far 36.602-1(a)(4)). Firms Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Cpars For Past Projects. part I Technical Capability first, The Technical Capability Of All Offers Will Be Evaluated On An Adjectival Basis. Sub-factors Will Be Weighted Equally, And All Areas Must Have At Least A Satisfactory Rating. evaluators Shall Assign A Rating From The Following Table Based On The Minimum Requirements Stated In Each Sub-factor Section. adjectival Rating definitions exceptional meets All Requirements And Exceed Majority Of Requirements. Overall The Proposal Meets And Significantly Exceeds, In All Aspects, The Standards For Evaluation: Very High Probability Of Success: No Significant Weaknesses. very Good meets All Requirements And Exceed Some Requirements. The Proposal Meets And, In Some Cases, Exceeds The Standards For Evaluation; High Probability Of Success; No Significant Weaknesses And Only Minor Correctable Deficiencies. satisfactory the Proposal Meets The Standard For Evaluation; Good Probability Of Success; Only Minor Weaknesses And Correctable Deficiencies. marginal lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Of The Standards For Evaluation; Low Probability Of Success; Major Weaknesses And/or Uncorrectable. unacceptable lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Or All Of The Standards For Evaluation; Need Major Revision To A New Submission To Make If Acceptable Or May Contain Uncorrectable Deficiencies. sub-factor 1 Specialized Experience And Technical Competence criteria: This Factor Will Evaluate The Offeror S Technical Competence, Based On Successful Completion Of Projects, In The Design Of Fire Protection Systems In A Hospital Environment. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) Examples Of Their Choice Of Completed Projects Or In Progress Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000). In Describing The Experience, Provide The Following Information: project Title, Location And Brief Description Including The Building Use (medical Facility, Etc) And Contracting Method (design Build, Design Bid Construct, Cm At Risk, Turnkey, Etc). project Owner And Name And Telephone Number Of Owner S Contact Person. indicate Your Firm S Role As A Prime Contractor Or Subcontractor, Etc. project Prime Contractor And Major Subcontractors And Name And Telephone Number Of Contact Person(s). project Statistics Including Start And Completion Dates (original Vs. Actual) For Design; Cost (with Brief Explanation Of What Is Included In The Cost); Square Footage; And Any Awards (prizes) Received. sub-factor 2 Professional Qualifications criteria: This Factor Evaluates The Offerors Specific Experience And Qualifications Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Offeror Must Provide The Resumes For The Following Key Personnel Purposed For Assignment To The Project: project/design Manager: Must Have A Minimum Of Five (5) Years Experience Successfully Managing Design Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. electrical Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Two (2) Years Experience Designing Electrical Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. mechanical Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Hvac Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. civil Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Hvac Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. architect: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above bim Manager: Must Have A Minimum Two (2) Years Experience Managing The Design Of Projects Using Building Information Modeling Software. other Disciplines Proposed By The Offeror: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Successfully Designing Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. all Resumes Must Include The Following Information And May Not Exceed Two (2) Pages Per Resume, And Must Explain How The Proposed Key Personnel S Experience Meets The Minimum Qualification Requirements For This Contract, As Described Above: name And Title project Assignment name Of Firm With Which Associated sub-factor 3 Capacity criteria: This Factor Will Evaluate The Offeror S Ability To Perform Both The Design And Construction Period Services. The Offeror Shall Demonstrate That Is Has The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. Additionally, The Offeror Shall Show That It Can Perform The Required Site Investigations, Design Services, And Construction Period Services Without Adversely Affecting The Project Schedule. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides: offeror Must Specify The Total Volume Of Work Awarded To The Firm Within Twelve (12) Months Of Solicitation Closing And Provide A Proposed Design Schedule Not To Exceed 215 Calendar Days. Prepare And Submit A Practicable Design Schedule Laying Out All Necessary Performance Elements Needed To Complete This Project Identified In The Solicitation In The Proposed Period Of Performance. The Schedule Must Be In The Form Of A Progress Chart Of Suitable Scale To Indicate Appropriately The Percentage Of Work Scheduled For Completion By Any Given Date During The Performance Period. In Addition, The Schedule Must Be Submitted In The Microsoft Project Format. Offerors Should Only Include The Work Elements Necessary To Complete The Required Work. It Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Identify All Necessary Project/work Elements And The Proposal Adequately Identifies Acceptable Critical Path Elements. sub-factor 4 Knowledge Of The Locality criteria: Identify Example Projects That Demonstrate The Firms Knowledge Of The Locality (i.e. Salem Va Medical Center). minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides: firms Shall Demonstrate Knowledge Of Localities Per Example Projects. Knowledge Of The Va Visn 6 Service Area Will Hold Much Higher Weight And Evaluated More Favorably Than Projects Outside The Visn 6 Service Area. General Understanding Of The Local Conditions, Including Physical Environment, Local Engineering Criteria, And Construction Methods Will Be Evaluated. The Following Key Personnel Resumes Shall Also Be Evaluated For Knowledge Of Localities: Project Manager, Architectural, Mechanical, And Electrical. The Basis Of Evaluation For This Criterion Will Focus On The Information Provided In Sf330, Part I, Section E (resume Of Key Personnel), Section F (example Projects), And Section H (additional Information) That Provides Additional Information Describing Same/similar Qualifications As Deemed Relevant To Performance At The Salem Va Medical Center sub-factor 5 Design Quality Control Plan criteria: The Plan Shall Identify Personnel, Design Review Procedures, Site Investigation/confirmation Of Existing Conditions Plan, Tests Proposed, And Forms To Be Used. A Finalized, More Detailed Design Quality Control Plan (qcp) Will Be Required To Be Submitted And Approved After Contract Award. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standards Of Acceptability Are Met When The Offeror Provides: a Description Of The Quality Control System, Including A Chart Showing Lines Of Authority And Acknowledgement That The Design Manager Shall Implement Control Measures For Verification Of All Design Activities. the Names, Qualifications (in Resume Format), Duties, Responsibilities, And Authorities Of Each Person Assigned As Design Quality Control (qc) Manager. Any Replacements Must Have Similar Qualifications In Dealing With Projects Of Similar Size And Scope. sub-factor 6 - Experience In Construction Period Services criteria: Identify Example Projects That Demonstrate The Firms Experience Providing Construction Period Services. Will Be Evaluated On Their Experience In Providing Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During Construction, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Request For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Preparing Cost Estimates. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) Examples Of Their Choice Of Completed Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000) For Which Construction Period Services Were Provided. part Ii Past Performance next, The Government Will Evaluate The Offeror S Demonstrated Past Performance Of Projects In Order To Determine The Offeror S Ability To Perform The Contract Successfully And Help Determine Responsibility. As With Technical Capabilities, The Firms Will Be Evaluated With An Adjectival Rating System. adjectival Rating definitions exceptional meets All Requirements And Exceed Majority Of Requirements. Overall The Proposal Meets And Significantly Exceeds, In All Aspects, The Standards For Evaluation: Very High Probability Of Success: No Significant Weaknesses. very Good meets All Requirements And Exceed Some Requirements. The Proposal Meets And, In Some Cases, Exceeds The Standards For Evaluation; High Probability Of Success; No Significant Weaknesses And Only Minor Correctable Deficiencies. satisfactory the Proposal Meets The Standard For Evaluation; Good Probability Of Success; Only Minor Weaknesses And Correctable Deficiencies. marginal lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Of The Standards For Evaluation; Low Probability Of Success; Major Weaknesses And/or Uncorrectable. unacceptable lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Or All Of The Standards For Evaluation; Need Major Revision To A New Submission To Make If Acceptable Or May Contain Uncorrectable Deficiencies. note: Offerors With No Relevant Past Performance History Will Not Be Evaluated Favorably Or Unfavorably On Past Performance And Will Be Given A Neutral Rating. criteria: Offerors Must Provide A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) References Of Their Choice Of Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Building Remodel/renovation; Minimum Construction Threshold Value Of $500,000). The Offeror Must Provide For Each Reference The Reference's Company Name, Pocs, Address, Contact Information To Include Phone Number And E-mail Address, Project Description, Dollar Value And Period Of Performance. The Government Will Consider And Evaluate Offeror's Past Performance Information, To Include The References, Which Are Deemed Recent And Relevant For The Requirements Of This Rfp. recency Assessment: An Assessment Of The Past Performance Information Will Be Made To Determine If It Is Recent. To Be Recent, The Effort Must Be Ongoing Or Must Have Been Performed During The Past 6 Years From The Date Of Issuance Of This Solicitation. Past Performance Information That Fails This Condition Will Not Be Evaluated. relevancy Assessment: An Evaluation Of All Recent Performance Information Obtained To Determine Whether The Provided Design Performed Under Those Contracts Relate To A Similar Size And Scope As Those Required By This Solicitation. In Determining The Relevancy Of Effort Performed Under Individual Past Performance Contracts, The Government Will Consider The Specific Effort Or Portion Consistent With That Proposed By The Prime Contractor And/or Subcontractors. The Past Performance Information Obtained From Sources Will Be Used To Establish The Relevancy Of Past Performance. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) References Of Their Choice Of Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Building Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000) In Which The Offeror Adhered To Period Of Performances. The Offeror Must Provide For Each Reference The Reference's Company Name, Pocs, Address, Contact Information To Include Phone Number And E-mail Address, Project Description, Dollar Value And Period Of Performance. The Government Will Consider And Evaluate Offeror's Past Performance Information, To Include The References, Which Are Deemed Recent And Relevant For The Requirements Of This Rfp. -- End Of Item 8. Evaluation Criteria -- release Of Claims For Delivery Orders: Prior To The Final Payment Under Each Delivery Order Issued Under This Contract Or Prior To Settlement Upon Termination Of The Delivery Order, And As A Condition Precedent Thereto, The A/e Shall Execute And Deliver To The Contracting Officer A Release Of All Claims Against The Government Arising Under Or By Virtue Of This Contract, Other Than Such Claims, If Any, As May Be Specifically Excepted By The A/e From The Operation Of The Release In Stated Amounts To Be Set Forth Therein. upon Completion Of Construction And Incorporation Of All Revisions Required To Complete The Record Drawings, The Following Items Shall Be Submitted: a. 1 Set Of Reproducible Hard Copy As-built Plans (30 X 42 ) Plus An Electronic Set In Autocad Version 2022 (.dwg) And Pdf Format.

Details: Notice: this Sources Sought Synopsis/request For Information (sss/rfi) Is Issued For Informational Purposes And Market Research Only. This Is Not A Request For A Quote, Request For Proposal, Or An Invitation To Bid, Nor Is This To Be Construed As A Commitment By The Government To Issue A Solicitation Or Ultimately Award A Contract. This Request Neither Constitutes A Solicitation For Proposals Nor The Authority To Enter Negotiations To Award A Contract. Additionally, This Sss Does Not Restrict The Government To A Particular Acquisition Approach. The Government Will Not Reimburse Any Company Or Individual For Any Expenses Associated With Preparing/submitting Information In Response To This Posting Or Any Follow-up Information Requests. Responders Are Advised That The Government Will Not Pay For Any Information Or Administrative Costs Incurred In Response To This Sss. All Costs Associated With Responding To This Sss Will Be Solely At The Responding Party’s Expense. No Funds Have Been Authorized, Appropriated, Or Received For This Effort. The Information Provided May Be Used By The Government In Developing Its Acquisition Strategy, Statement Of Work/statement Of Objectives, And Performance Specifications. Interested Parties Are Responsible For Adequately Marking Proprietary Or Competition Sensitive Information Contained Within Their Response As Instructed Later In This Sss/rfi. The Government Shall Not Be Liable For, Or Suffer Any Consequential Damages, For Any Proprietary Information Not Properly Identified. Please Be Advised That All Submissions Become Government Property And Will Not Be Returned. overview: the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (aflcmc), Human Systems Division (hsd), Combat Ready Airman (cra) Branch, Wright-patterson Afb, Oh Is Conducting Market Research To Identify Possible Vendors And/or Manufacturers That Can Provide Aviator Helmets That Are Compatible With Fixed Wing Ejection And Non- Ejection Systems On Multiple Usaf Aircraft Weapon Systems. background Information: usaf Aircrew Require The Ability To Easily And Rapidly Transition Between Symbology Displays, Cueing, And Night Vision Or Use These Devices Simultaneously For Optimum Capability. Installing These Advanced Avionics On The Current 20+ Year Old Helmet Degrades The System's Operational Performance. If This Helmet Is Not Modified, Aircrew Will Continue To Have To Overcome Jitter, Loss Of Night Vision Image And Display Symbology, Neck Strain, And Increased Potential For Injury During Ejection. In Addition, Proprietary Helmets Designed To Optimize Specific Displays Will Be Introduced Into The Inventory, Increasing Logistical Footprint. current Helmets Are Not Optimized For Use With Night Vision And Weapon Cueing/display Systems Required To Operate Modern Aircraft. Currently, Employing These Devices Require Extensive Modifications To Current Helmets That Were Not Designed To Accommodate Them. This Results In Poor Weight Distribution And Stability Which Contributes To Mission Degradation, Aircrew Fatigue, Neck Strain, And An Increased Potential For Injury. In Addition, Current Helmets Do Not Provide Adequate Noise And Impact Protection. systems Requirements: please Provide Information Regarding The Following Capabilities Of Your Helmet System Regarding The Following Categories And Provide Rationale How It Is Compliant: key Performance Parameter (kpp) 1. Kpp #1: Stability the Fwh Will Provide A Stable Fixed Reference To The User’s Eye Through The Full Range Of Aircraft Operations. When Used With Helmet Mounted Equipment, There Will Be No Vignetting (loss) Of Symbology Or Imagery Or Loss Of Resolution Of Optical Systems. how Much Tension Load Can Your Helmet Withstand Over A 2.0-minute Exposure? 2. Kpp #2: Equipment Compatibility the System And Its Components Will Be Compatible With And Not Degrade Aircrew Flight Equipment And Helmet Mounted Devices. how Does Your Helmet System Integrate With Current Helmet Mounted Displays (hmds) (i.e. Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (jhmcs), Hybrid Optical-based Inertial Tracker (hobit), Night Vision Goggles (nvgs))? are You Compatible With Any Other Hmds, Not Specifically Called Out? what Capability Do You Have To Work With Other Companies To Understand Future Requirements/technologies For Helmet-related Systems To Include Hmds (ijhmcs, Etc.), Oxygen Masks, And Visors? is Your Helmet System Compatible With The Equipment Listed In Attachment I? 3. Kpp# 3:weight, Center Of Gravity, And Principal Moments Of Inertia the Weight, Center Of Gravity (cg), And Principal Moments Of Inertia (moi) Of The Fwh (in All Configurations) Will Decrease Neck Loads (compared To The Helmet(s) It Replaces) To The Aircrew During High-g Maneuvering, Bailout, 600 Knots Equivalent Air Speed (keas) Ejection, Parachute Opening, Ditching, And Crash-landing Scenarios. what Data Can You Provide To Support Your Helmet Reduces Weight, Cg, And Moi To Decrease Neck Loads? what Evidence Can You Provide To Show Your Helmet Decreases Neck Loads Against Mil-hdbk-516c, For Example: Multi-axial Neck Injury Criteria – Y Axis (manicy), Neck Moment Index (nmix), And Probability Of Concussion (poc)? key System Attributes (ksa) Capability 4. Impact Protection the System Will Protect The Crewmember’s Head From Impacts Associated With Basic Aircraft Maneuvers, Ejection, Bailout, Ditching, And Crash Landing Better Than The Helmet It Replaces what Data Can You Provide To Show That Your Helmet Can Withstand A 600 Keas Ejection Sequence With Limited Physical Damage That Would Cause Injury To The Aircrew Or Impair The Ability Of The Helmet To Protect The Aircrew? what Data Can You Provide To Show That No Part Of The Helmet System Will Become Foreign Object Debris In A 600 Keas Windblast? 5. Logistics fwh Variants Will Use Common Components To Reduce The Logistical Footprint Compared To Existing Systems, And Be Organically Supportable By Defense Logistics Agency. 6. Anthropometric Accommodation the Fwh Will Accommodate The Central 99% Of The Male And Central 99% Of The Female Aircrew Population (with 90% Confidence) In The Minimum Number Of Sizes, With The Remainder Being Fitted With Minor Modifications To Existing Sizes. 7. Acoustic Dose the Fwh Will Ensure Wearers Experience Acceptable Noise Levels, Technically Defined As Less Than Or Equal To 100% Acoustic Dose (1.0 Total Daily Exposure (tde) @ Mean -2 Standard Deviations (sd) Performance For Fit) For Crew Positions In 90% Of Aircraft. 8. Speech Intelligibility the Fwh Will Enable Helmeted Aircrew To Score Greater Than 80% On The Modified Rhyme Test (mrt) In The Laboratory With Talker And Listener Under Simulated Flight Noise Conditions. 9. Fit/wearability the Fwh Fit, In All Configurations, Will Be Repeatable, Accommodate Missions Of Extended Duration, And Not Cause Hot Spots/pressure Points That Degrade Performance On 95% Of Aircrews. 10. Aircraft Compatibility the Fwh Will Be Compatible With The Aircraft Without Requiring Aircraft Modifications. 11. In-flight Mission Reconfiguration the Fwh Will Accommodate Safe And Rapid In-flight Reconfiguration Of Fielded And Post-milestone B Helmet Mounted Devices Without Removing The Helmet During All Mission Profiles No Worse Than Legacy. additional Performance Attributes 12. Head Supported Weight. the Mass Properties Of The System Will Not Decrease The Ability Of The Wearer To Perform Related Tasks Over The Duration Of The Mission. what Is The Weight Of Your Helmet System As Operationally Worn For The Slick Configuration? Weight Reported Will Include Fully Assembled Base Helmet As Worn By The User, Excluding Interfacing Aircrew Flight Equipment (afe) (i.e. No Oxygen Mask, Or External Communication Cabling). Please Report The Weights For Each Size Of The Helmet System. in Addition To Head Supported Weight Of Your Helmet System (described Above), Report Mass Properties Of Your Helmet System, In All Configurations, For Day And Night Operations, Using The Template And Guidance Found In Attachment Ii. Upon Reporting According To The Template, Describe Set-up And Methods Utilized For Collecting Measurements. 13. Eye Protection the Fwh (in All Configurations) Will Shield The Eyes During All Flight And Ground Operations, From Adverse Effects Of Solar Radiation, Windblast, Airborne Debris, Bailout, Ditching, And 600 Keas Ejection. tell Us How Your Helmet System Will Provide Eye Protection In All Phases Of Ejection (initiation Of Ejection To Ground Landing), During Day And Night Operations With Respect To Slick, Jhmcs, Hobit, And Nvgs. what Data Can You Provide To Show That The Visor Of Your Slick Helmet System Remains In A Down And Locked Position During All Phases Of A 600 Keas Ejection (initiation Until Ground Landing), During Day And Night Operations? what Data Can You Provide To Show That Your Helmet System In The Jhmcs And Hobit Configuration Provides Eye Protection To The User During All Phases Of A 450 Keas Ejection (initiation Until Ground Landing), During Day And Night Operations? 14. Visor/visual Compatibility the Fwh Will Provide Aircrew The Ability To Rapidly Transition Between Two Visors Using One Gloved Hand During Flight Operations. The Visors’ Optical Distortion Qualities And Transmissivity Options Will Be Equal To Or Better Than The Visor Configurations They Replace. does Your Visor Meet The Criteria In Mil-dtl-43511d? If Any Deviations Exist, Please Note Them. 15. Field Of View/regard the Fwh Will Provide A Field Of View And Field Of Regard Equal To The Helmet Being Replaced. 16. Penetration Protection the System Will Protect The Crewmember’s Head From Penetrations Associated With Basic Aircraft Maneuvers, Ejection, Bailout, Ditching, And Crash Landing To A Level Equivalent To The Helmet It Replaces. what Data Can You Supply From Testing To Show That Your Helmet System Supplies Protection Against Impact And Penetration? 17. Retention the Fwh And Visor Will Be Safely Retained And Remain In Its Worn Position When Exposed To A 600 Keas Ejection tell Us How Your Helmet System Can Be Retained In All Phases Of Ejection (initiation Of Ejection To Ground Landing). 18. Bulk the Helmet Shape And Cabling Will Not Interfere With Aircrew Mobility, Ingress/egress (including Emergency Egress) Requirements, Or The Operation Of The Ejection Seats In All Aircraft. 19. Spinal Alignment the Helmet Shape Will Enable Proper Spinal Alignment During Flight When Interfacing With The Ejection Seat Head Pad. 20. Audio Compatibility the Fwh Noise Attenuation System Will Be Compatible With All Aircraft Systems And Will Not Impede Recognition Of Audible Aircraft Warning/caution Systems, Night Vision Equipment, Weapons System Employment, Or Decrease Accuracy Of Helmet-mounted Cueing Devices. 21. Aircraft Cockpit Simulator Compatibility the Fwh Will Be Compatible With All Existing Aircraft Cockpit Simulators. If New Adapters Are Required, They Must Be Provisioned For And Provided As Part Of The System. 22. Internal Communication Systems (ics) the Fwh Noise Attenuation System Will Be Compatible With All Aircraft Icss. 23. Emergency Ground Egress the Fwh Will Not Interfere With Emergency Ground Egress Procedures Or Require Any Additional Aircrew Action To Disconnect The Helmet System From The Aircraft Wiring (i.e. Disconnect Will Break Away During Aircrew Egress). 24. Fire Safety the Fwh Will Provide Flame, Drip, And Melt Protection Equal To Or Better Than Current Fielded Helmets. 25. Don And Doff aircrew Will Be Able To Don And Doff The Helmet Without Assistance. The Aircrew Will Be Able To Remove The Helmet During An Emergency With One Hand Using Either Hand. 26. Audio Performance the System Will Provide Broadband Audio Output With Minimal Distortion And Ensure Overall Sound Pressure Level And Electrical Polarity Are Matched Across Both Ears. what Data Can You Provide For Audio Performance Testing That You Have Conducted On Your Helmet System? if Available Please Provide Specifics On: Broadband Frequency Response, Distortion, Sensitivity Balance, Volume Control, And Speech Intelligibility. 27. Volume Control adjustment Of The Aircraft Ics Volume Control Will Result In A Corresponding Volume Change At The Ear. 28. Cockpit Illuminator the Fwh Will Provide A Modular, Night Vision Compatible Light Source With An On/off Switch Selectable By The Aircrew During Flight. 29. 3-d Audio the Fwh Will Be Capable Of Accepting 3-d Audio Cueing For Radio Communication And Threat/targeting Information. what Data Can You Provide To Show Your Helmet Provides 3d Spatial Audio Support? 30. External Audio fwh Will Be Capable Of Providing An External Audio Capability That Allows Dismounted Aircrew The Ability To Hear The External Environment While Wearing The Helmet. 31. Atmospheric Pressure Changes the Fwh Will Not Increase The Risk Of Aircrew Injury Throughout The Range Of Atmospheric Pressure Changes Experienced During Flight. 32. Altitude Protection the Fwh Will Allow Users To Safely Operate Aircraft At Altitudes Up To The Maximum Operational Cabin Altitude. 33. Emi/emc Compatibility the Fwh Will Not Emit Electromagnetic Energy That Exceeds The Limits Of Mil-std-461 And Ads-37a-prf As It Applies To Mission Critical Equipmentor Be Degraded By Electronic Emissions In Its Operational Environment. 28. Cockpit Illuminator the Fwh Will Provide A Modular, Night Vision Compatible Light Source With An On/off Switch Selectable By The Aircrew During Flight. 29. 3-d Audio the Fwh Will Be Capable Of Accepting 3-d Audio Cueing For Radio Communication And Threat/targeting Information. what Data Can You Provide To Show Your Helmet Provides 3d Spatial Audio Support? 30. External Audio fwh Will Be Capable Of Providing An External Audio Capability That Allows Dismounted Aircrew The Ability To Hear The External Environment While Wearing The Helmet. 31. Atmospheric Pressure Changes the Fwh Will Not Increase The Risk Of Aircrew Injury Throughout The Range Of Atmospheric Pressure Changes Experienced During Flight. 32. Altitude Protection the Fwh Will Allow Users To Safely Operate Aircraft At Altitudes Up To The Maximum Operational Cabin Altitude. 33. Emi/emc Compatibility the Fwh Will Not Emit Electromagnetic Energy That Exceeds The Limits Of Mil-std-461 And Ads-37a-prf As It Applies To Mission Critical Equipment Or Be Degraded By Electronic Emissions In Its Operational Environment. 34. Electrostatic Discharge (esd). fwh Performance Will Not Be Affected By Esd Events. 35. Communication Devices the System Will Be Compatible With Or Replace Current Communications Devices Designed For Use With Aircrew Helmets And Oxygen Masks. 36. Boom Microphones the Fwh Will Be Compatible With A Boom Microphone. 37. Habitability fwh Will Allow Aircrew The Unimpeded Ability To Eat, Hydrate, And One- Handed Valsalva. 38. Operability direct Manipulation Of The Donned Fwh By The Aircrew Under Operational Conditions, Will Require Only One Gloved (standard Nomex Flight Glove) Hand To Easily Operate Any Mechanism. 39. Positive Pressure Breathing the Fwh Will Allow For The Effective Use Of Positive Pressure Breathing For Altitude And G Systems. 40. Temperature And Moisture Control the Fwh Will Incorporate A Washable Moisture-wicking And Anti-microbial Interface That Does Not Present A Burn Hazard In Extreme Thermal Survival Environments. 41. Reliability the Minimum Acceptable Mean-time-between-critical Failure (mtbcf) Is Seven Years. 42. Maintainability mean Repair Time (mrt) Will Not Exceed 0.5 Hours, With 95 Percent Of The Tasks Not Exceeding 3.0 Hours. 43. Durability the Fwh And Its Components Will Be Shatter Proof, Non-reflective, And Have Abrasion/chip/stain/ Corrosion Resistance Equal To The Current System. 44. Materials And Helmet Shape materials And Helmet Shape Will Not Damage Aircraft Canopies, Windscreens, Other Transparencies, And Structures. 45. Survival And Rescue Compatibility the Fwh Will Not Interfere With Or Degrade The Performance Of Any Survival/rescue Equipment Or Procedures. 46. Support Equipment (se) if New Tmde, Se, Or Tools Are Required, They Must Be Provisioned For And Provided As Part Of The System. 47. Maintenance Planning maintenance, Repair, And Reconstitution Tasks Will Be Accomplished By Appropriately Qualified Organizational Level Aircrew Flight Equipment Specialist. 48. Maintenance Environment system Design Will Allow Maintenance To Be Performed In Hostile Environmental Conditions (e.g. Arctic And Mopp-4) At Operating Bases/locations Worldwide To Include Mobile, Sea-based, And Bare-base Facilities. 49. Inspections periodic Inspections And Preventive Maintenance Tasks Will Be Sufficient To Ensure System Integrity. Inspection Intervals Will Be Equal To The Helmet It Replaces. 50. Technical Data technical Orders/manuals (to/tm) For Integration/operation And Repair Will Include Illustrated Parts Breakdowns, Parts Listings, Diagrams, Theory Of Operation, Maintenance, And Troubleshooting Guides. The Technical Data Will Be Formally Verified, Validated, And Approved By The Appropriate Agencies Prior To The Delivery Of The First System. Time And Cost To Fully Incorporate Technical Data Will Be Part Of The Program Cost And Schedule. 51. Manpower manning Required For The System Should Meet Current Authorized Levels. Specifically, No Additional Logistics, Maintenance Or Aircrew Flight Equipment Authorizations Will Be Required To Support The New Helmet. 52. Human Factors Engineering human Factors Engineering Principles Specified In Mil-std-1472 Should Be Employed To The Maximum Extent Possible In Each Fwh System Solution. instructions To Potential Respondents: 1. Submit One (1) Electronic Copy To Ms. Samantha Mckee, Samantha.mckee.1@us.af.mil, No Later Than 6:00 Pm Est On 30 January 2025. Title E-mail Responses In The Subject Line Of The E-mail As Follows: “response To Next Generation Fixed Wing Helmet Rfi Rou-a044401.” 2. Respondents, Please Provide Data That Can Support These Questions As Well As Ejection Data That You Have. Respondents Shall Provide Capability Descriptions In The Same Format As The Above System Requirements Table, Attachment I – Equipment Compatibility, And Attachment Ii – Mass Properties And Should Include Technical And Descriptive Text To Provide Sufficient Detail On How The Proposed Solutions Will Benefit The Human Systems Division (hsd), As Outlined In The Systems Requirements Section Above. Submissions Shall Be Limited To No More Than 28 Pages Inclusive Of Answers To Requirement Specifications/questions Detailed In The Matrix Above; Any Necessary Product Sheets, Test Data, Graphs, And Charts Supporting Those Answers Shall Be Limited To No More Than 5 Pages As Well As A Rom (detailed Below) Of No More Than 3 Pages. Please Identify A Representative To Support Further Government Inquiries And Requests For Clarification Of The Information Provided, If Needed. Marketing Materials Are Considered An Insufficient Response To This Sources Sought Synopsis. 3. Please Provide A Rough Order Of Magnitude (rom) Cost Estimate. Rom Length Should Be No More Than 3 Pages. Provide Estimated Cost For The Following: This Section Of Your Response Should Provide Estimated Costs For Development, Non-recurring Engineering, Qualification Testing, And Future Production Costs. Specifically For Production, Include Helmet Unit Costs And Monthly Production Capacity For A Total 22,500 Production Units. The Government Is Interested In Obtaining Product Support Engineering Data Or A Technical Data Package (tdp) That Includes The Appropriate Level Of Data To Support An Organic Level Of Maintenance (that Could Include Up To Level 3 Drawings Iaw Mil-std-31000, Rev B, Sections 4.2 And 5.4.1.3). Furthermore, Please Provide An Estimate For Technical Manuals For The Helmets, Initial Provisioning Data And Any Required Updates Through Full Rate Production, And Training Costs To Include Training Evaluations And Fielding. 4. Please Provide A Program Schedule To Include Emd, Production, And Fielding Timelines. 5. Responses Shall Include The Following Information: company/institute Name: address: point Of Contact (to Include Phone Number And Email Address): cage Code: unique Entity Id: web Page Url: state Whether The Company Is Domestically Or Foreign Owned (if Foreign, Indicate The Country Of Ownership). state Whether The Company Is Interested In Being A Prime Contractor Or Subcontractor For This Requirement. state The Company’s Manufacturing Readiness Level In Support Of Helmet Production And Provide A Manufacturing Readiness Assessment. state The Business Readiness To Support Financial Capabilities To Support Government Testing And Production Of Helmets. provide Data Supporting Design Is Stable And Meets Above Listed Capabilities And Requirements Outlined In Table Above. provide Supply Chain Process And Capabilities To Support Helmet Production. lead Time Projected For Vendors To Support Manufacturing Of First Article Delivery provide An Assertion Your Helmet System Is Compliant With The Following Regulations: far 52.225-1, Buy American-supplies dfars 252.225-7012, Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities provide Data Rights Assertions, Please Use The Table Below: contractors Must Identify Any Noncommercial Data (data Is Technical Data And Computer Software) To Be Delivered Or Otherwise Provided Under The Contract To The Government With Data Rights Requirements More Restrictive That Unlimited Data Rights. provide Assertions At The Lowest Practical Segregable Level: software: Module Or Subroutine technical Data: Subsystem, Component Or Sub-component. refer To Dfars 252.227-7017 For Appropriate Language data Rights Assertions | Technical Data/computer Software To Be Furnished With Restrictions |basis Of Assertion |asserted Rights Category |person Asserting Restrictions 6. All Prospective Contractors Must Be Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database To Be Awarded A Dod Contract. The North American Industry Classification System (naics) Code For This Requirement, If Applicable To The Company’s Capabilities, Should Be Included In The Company’s Naics Code Listing In Sam. To Learn More About This Sam Requirement And How To Register, Please Visit The Sam Website At Https://www.sam.gov/ 7. The Naics Code For This Action Is 339113 – Helmets (except Athletic), Safety (e.g., Motorized Vehicle Crash Helmets, Space Helmets), Manufacturing With A Size Standard Of 800 Employees. Based On This Naics Code, Indicate Whether Your Company Qualifies As A: self-certified Or Third Party Certified Small Business (yes / No) self-certified Or Third Party Certified Women-owned Small Business (yes / No) self-certified Or Third Party Certified Economically Disadvantaged Women- Owned Small Business (yes/no) self-certified Or Third Party Certified Hubzone Certified (yes / No) self-certified Or Third Party Certified Veteran-owned Small Business (yes / No) self-certified Or Third Party Certified Service-disabled-veteran-owned Small Business (yes / No) self-certified Or Third Party Certified 8(a) (yes / No) self-certified Or Third Party Certified Sba certification Date: ____________ sba Graduation Date: ______________ communication And Additional Considerations: in Accordance With Far 15.201(e), Responses To This Notice Are Not Offers And Cannot Be Accepted By The U.s. Government To Form A Binding Contract. the Government Will Not Award A Contract On The Basis Of This Rfi. A Determination Not To Compete This Action Based On Responses Received Is Solely Within The Government’s Discretion. the Acquisition Strategy Is Still Being Determined. Market Research Results Will Assist The Air Force In Determining Whether This Requirement Will Be A Full And Open Competition, A Small Business Set Aside, A Sole Source Acquisition, Or Utilization Of Dla Contract. not Responding To This Sss Does Not Preclude Participation In Any Future Rfp, If Any Is Issued. the Government May Contact Respondents To Obtain Additional Information Or Clarification In Order To Fully Understand A Response. This May Include Discussions, Site Visits, Demonstrations, Etc. To Further The Government’s Understanding Of A Proposed Effort, As Well As The Respondent’s Understanding Of The Government’s Requirements. responses To Questions From Interested Parties Will Be Promptly Answered And Posted On Sam.gov Unless Some Release Of Proprietary Information Is Involved Or The Answer Addresses A Question Peculiar To A Company Or That Company’s Response. Post Submittal, One-on-one Information Sessions With Respondents Are Not Contemplated; However, They May Be Offered To Respondents To Clarify The Government’s Understanding Of Their Submittal, The Capability Ramifications, Or To Discuss Their Business Approach. Information Feedback Sessions May Be Offered To Respondents After The Sss Assessments Are Completed. verbal Questions Will Not Be Accepted. All Questions Will Be Answered Through Postings To Sam.gov; Except As Provided Above. Additionally, Questions Must Not Contain Trade Secrets Or Classified Information. The Government Reserves The Right To Not Address Questions Received After 30january 2025. respondents That Submit Proprietary Data Shall Clearly Mark The Data With Appropriate Markings On The Cover Sheet And On Each Applicable Page. Any Proprietary Data Submitted May Be Handled By Contract Support Services Personnel Who Have Signed An Nda. Any Proprietary Information Received In Response To This Request Will Be Properly Protected From Any Unauthorized Disclosure. The Government Will Not Use Proprietary Information Submitted From Any One Firm To Establish The Capability And Requirements For Any Future Systems Acquisitions, So As To Not Inadvertently Restrict Competition. Any Material That Is Not Marked Proprietary Will Be Considered Publicly Releasable broad Industry Participation For This Sources Sought Is Encouraged. U.s. And Non-u.s. Firms Are Permitted To Respond To This Sss/rfi. if A Company Is Capable Of Some, But Not The Entire Requirement Stated In This Sources Sought Synopsis, Please Provide A Response That Explains The Requirements For Which You Are Capable. small Businesses Are Encouraged To Provide Responses To This Sss In Order To Assist The Program Office In Determining Potential Levels Of Competition Available In The Industry, As Well As Helping To Establish A Basis For Developing Any Subsequent Subcontracting Goals. companies Responding To This Sss/rfi Are Encouraged To Provide Quotes For Existing Items. These Quotes Are For Planning Purposes Only. indicate Whether The Company Is Currently Selling Proposed Solution To Department Of Defense Customers And Whether The Capability Can Be Obtained Under An Existing Government Contract. Provide The Contract Number(s) And Government Points Of Contact Accordingly. this Notice May Be Updated As Additional Information Becomes Available. Please Check The Sam.gov For Updates To This Announcement And Register To Receive E-mail Notices Of Any Updates.