Architect Tenders

Details: Description Request For Expression Of Interest 1. The University Of The Philippines Manila, Through Upsa Funds Intends To Apply The Sum Of One Million Eight Hundred Thousand Pesos (php1,800,000.00) Being The Approved Budget For The Contract (abc) To Payments Under The Contract For Consultancy Services For The Design Of The University Of The Philippines Manila Network. Bids Received In Excess Of The Abc Shall Be Automatically Rejected At The Opening Of The Financial Proposals. 2. The University Of The Philippines Manila Now Calls For The Submission Of Letter Of Intent And Eligibility Documents For Above Indicated Contract. Eligibility Documents Of Interested Consultants Must Be Duly Received By The Procurement Management Office On Or Before 1:00 P.m, 14 January 2024 At The 2nd Floor Joaquin Gonzales Compound, Padre Faura St., Ermita Manila, University Of The Philippines Manila. Applications For Eligibility Will Be Evaluated Based On A Non- Discretionary “pass/fail” Criterion. 3. Interested Bidders May Obtain Further Information And Inspect The Bidding Documents At Up Manila Bac 2 Secretariat Office At 2nd Floor Joaquin Gonzales Compound, Padre Faura St., Ermita Manila, University Of The Philippines (8:00 Am – 4:00pm). 4. A Complete Set Of Bidding Documents May Be Acquired By Interested Bidders Starting 07 January 2024 From Bac Ii Secretariat Office At 2nd Floor Joaquin Gonzales Compound, Padre Faura St., Ermita Manila, University Of The Philippines Manila., And Upon Payment Of The Applicable Fee For The Bidding Documents, Pursuant To The Latest Guidelines Issued By The Gppb, In The Amount Of Five Thousand Pesos (php5, 000.00). It May Also Be Downloaded Free Of Charge From The Website Of The Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (philgeps) And The Website Of The Procuring Entity, Provided That Bidders Shall Pay The Applicable Fee For The Bidding Documents Not Later Than The Submission Of Their Bids. 5. The Bac Shall Draw Up The Short List Of Consultants From Those Who Have Submitted Expression Of Interest, Including The Eligibility Documents, And Have Been Determined As Eligible In Accordance With The Provisions Of Republic Act 9184 (ra 9184), Otherwise Known As The “government Procurement Reform Act”, And Its Implementing Rules And Regulations (irr). The Short List Shall Consist Of At Most Five (5) Prospective Bidders Who Will Be Entitled To Submit Bids. The Criteria And Rating System For Short Listing Are: Experience In The Field The Senior Project Manager Must Have A Minimum Of 12 Years In Handling Large It Projects, And 10 Years In Network Operations. The Table Below Summarizes The Rating To Be Given Years In Large It Projects Years In Network Operations Rating 12-15 10-12 5 Pts (20%) More Than 15 10-12 7.5 Pts (30%) 12-15 More Than 12 7.5 Pts (30%) More Than 15 More Than 12 10 Pts (40%) 40% 1 List Of Credible Personnel A Complete Team Shall Be Composed Of The Following: Network Architect Cybersecurity Consulting Team Incomplete – 0 Pts Complete – 10 Pts (40%) 40 % List Of Similar/comparable Projects (minimum – Php 1m) As To Cost Php 1,000,000.00 - Php 2,000,000.00 – 5 Pts (10%) Above Php 2,000,000.00 - 10 Pts (20%) 20 % Total 100% Minimum Score Required 75% Bidding Will Be Conducted Through Open Competitive Bidding Procedures Using Non- Discretionary “pass/fail” Criterion As Specified In The Irr Of Ra 9184. (i) Bidding Is Restricted To Filipino Citizens/sole Proprietorships, Cooperatives, And Partnerships Or Organizations With At Least Sixty Percent (60%) Interest Or Outstanding Capital Stock Belonging To Citizens Of The Philippines. 6. The Procuring Entity Shall Evaluate Bids Using The Quality-cost Based Evaluation/selection (qcbe/qcbs) Procedure. The Weights To Be Allocated For The Technical Will Be 80% And Financial Proposals 20%. The Criteria And Rating System For The Evaluation Of Bids Shall Be Provided In The Instructions To Bidders. 7. The Contract Shall Be Completed Within Ninety (90) Calendar Days. 8. The University Of The Philippines Manila Reserves The Right To Reject Any And All Bids, Declare A Failure Of Bidding, Or Not Award The Contract At Any Time Prior To Contract Award In Accordance With Section 41 Of Ra 9184 And Its Irr, Without Thereby Incurring Any Liability To The Affected Bidder Or Bidders.

Details: Amendment 0001 - The Due Date For Qualifications Has Been Extended To Monday, January 13, 2025, 2:00pm Est. Government Responses To Rfi's Have Been Attached To This Notice. description: this Is A Request For Qualifications For Architect And Engineering (a&e) Services. This Request Is 100% Set-aside For Small Business’s Registered Under The Applicable Naics Code 541330 – Engineering Services, With A Size Standard Of $25,500,000. the National Institute Of Standards And Technology (nist), An Agency Of The U.s., Department Of Commerce, Intends To Award Multiple Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (idiq) Contract(s) For General Architectural And Engineering (a/e) Services For The Nist Gaithersburg Campus Located At 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Md 20899. A/e Services Under The Contract May Include The Following: evaluation And Feasibility Studies To Include Engineering Modeling And Simulation demolition Of Nist Structures, Utilities, And Infrastructure repair And/or Repair By Replacement, Modification/reconfiguration, Building Additions, And Upgrades To Nist Facilities (e.g., Laboratories/scientific Research, Office, Industrial). Including But Not Limited To Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Communications, Structural, Fire Protection, And Building Enclosure (e.g., Roofs, Windows, Foundations). repair And/or Repair By Replacement, Modification/reconfiguration For Campus Utility Systems And Supporting Underground Structures comprehensive Historical Assessments For The Preservation, Rehabilitation, And Restoration Of Historic Property interior Design Services Consisting Of Programming And Space Assessment, Fit Plans, And Office Furniture To Enhance Aesthetics, Comfort, Efficiency, And Workplace Safety. cost Estimating For Different Levels (e.g., Concept, Detailed Program, Project) life Cycle Cost Analysis Identifying Cost Elements From Initial Concept Through Operations, Support, And Disposal. hazardous Material Survey And Risk Assessment (e.g., Asbestos, Mold, Lead Paint) roofing And Waterproofing Services Such As Visual Inspections And Existing Conditions Surveys, Failure Investigation, And Design For Repairs. commissioning Design Including Assistance Of Development Owner’s Project Requirements (opr), Design Document Reviews, Development Of Commissioning Specifications And Or Initial Commissioning Plan program Of Requirements (por) Development By Meeting With Campus Personnel And Confirming Design Intent For Building And/or Major Systems (e.g., Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Structural, Controls, Security, Fire Alarm, Etc.) value Engineering Analysis To Achieve Design Goals While Lowering Life Cycle Costs And Maintaining The Required Performance, Quality, Reliability, And Maintainability. record Drawings Development From Compiled As-built Set. surveying (e.g., Alta/ascm, Boundary, Topographic, Construction, Site Planning) roads/sidewalks Repairs And Replacement evaluation Of Items Requiring Earthwork Such As Excavation, Grading, Ponds, Drainage, Foundation, And Footings landscaping Design gates, Fencing, And Related Engineering Necessary To Support A Campus Environment permit Applications Submission To Regulatory Authorities Based On Specific Project Requirements. To Be Coordinated With Cor And Or Ahj For Acceptance And Or Approval environmental Compliance (state Or Federal) Conforming To Laws, Regulations, Standards, And Other Requirements construction Quality Management To Include But Not Limited To Commissioning Services contract Information: the Period Of Performance Of The Idiq Contract(s) Shall Be Five (5) Years. Annual Fully Burdened Labor Rates Will Be Negotiated Prior To Award. All Services Will Be Ordered Via The Issuance Of Individually Negotiated Firm-fixed-price Or Not­to-exceed Task Orders, Ranging In Value From $10,000 And $2,000,000. Each Idiq Contract Shall Include A Guaranteed Minimum Order Of $5,000. The Cumulative Amount Of All Task Orders Shall Not Exceed $9,800,000. the Government Anticipates Award Of Three (3) Or More Idiq Contracts; However, The Actual Number Of Awards Shall Be Made At The Discretion Of The Government. submission Requirements: consideration Will Be Limited To Professional A/e Firms Licensed And Registered In Maryland Who Provide A/e Services Primarily In The Disciplines Of Architectural, Civil, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, And Environmental Engineering For Pre-design, Design, And Post-design Of Research Laboratory Facilities. firms Meeting The Above Requirements And Desiring Consideration Must Submit Their Qualifications By No Later Than The Date Specified In This Announcement Via Email To The Following Addresses Using The Email Subject Line “rfq Submission – General Ae Services Idiq Nb195000-25-00009”: Trent.stevens@nist.gov Guzel.gufranova@nist.gov Teresa.harris@nist.gov qualification Submissions Shall Include One (1) Original Electronic Copy In Adobe .pdf Format Of Their Standard Form 330 (sf-330) With Appropriate Data. Ae Firms Shall Include All Subcontractor's Resumes In Part 1 Of The Sf-330. Part 2 Of The Sf-330, General Qualifications, Should Also Be Submitted For Each Subcontractor Or Consultant. Indicate The Solicitation Number On All Documentation Submitted. along With The Sf-330, Offerors Shall Include: a Copy Of Your Current Registration In System For Award Management (sam); proof Of Small Business Status; a Cover Page That Provides: offeror’s Name And Address; offeror’s Uei Number; And, the Name, Title, Email, And Phone Number For The Authorized Representative Of The Offeror. submissions Will Be Evaluated By A Source Selection Evaluation Board (sseb) And Ranked Based On The Stated Evaluation Factors. The Government Will Then Establish A Competitive Range; Firms That Fall Within This Range Will Be Invited To Present Their Capabilities To The Sseb. Formal Solicitations Requesting Fee Proposals Will Be Issued To The Highest Qualified Firms As Determined By The Government. request For Information (rfi) questions And Rfi's Must Be Submitted No Later Than 1:00pm Et On 12/10/2024 Via Email To The Following Addresses Using The Subject Line “rfi - General Ae Services Idiq Nb195000-25-00009” : Trent.stevens@nist.gov Guzel.gufranova@nist.gov. the Contracting Officer Will Post Government Responses To Rfi’s On This Site As An Amendment To This Announcement. Firms Are Responsible For Monitoring This Site For Amendments To The Request For Qualifications. selection Criteria: all Work Performed Shall Be Under The Direct Control And Supervision Of A Professional And Experience Licensed Architect/engineer Employed By The Prime Contractor Assigned As The Responsible Party. part I: Evaluation Of Sf-330 prospective A-e Firms Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Type Of Professional Services Required. The Agency Will Evaluate Each Potential A-e Firm In Terms Of This Announcement. The Selection Criteria Are Listed Below In Descending Order Of Importance: factor 1: Specialized Experience page Limit – 15 Pages firms Who Fail To Meet The Qualifications Of Factor 1 Will Not Be Evaluated On Subsequent Evaluation Factors And Will Not Be Considered For Award. offeror Shall Demonstrate The Specialized Experience And Technical Competence Of Its Firm And Its Proposed Subcontractors Performing A/e Services Meeting The Criteria Of This Solicitation Within The Past Sixty (60) Months By Providing At Least 3 But No More Than 5 Example Projects (sections F, G, And H Of The Sf330) Addressing Each Of The Subfactors Listed Below (1a, 1b, 1c, And 1d). Offeror Shall Provide At Least One Example For Subfactor 1d. All Designs Shall Be Completed At Time Of Request For Qualifications (rfq). For The Purposes Of This Evaluations, “completed” Projects Shall Mean Projects Where Final Work Was Submitted, Approved, And Accepted By The Project Owner. A. The Offeror Shall Describe Design For Renovations With Dates That Include Commercial Window Replacements, Masonry Repairs, And Roofing Repairs. Roofing Designs Are For Replacement Of An Existing Roofing System And Would Include Design And Specifications For New Built-up Roofs (at Least Three Ply) Of At Least 20,000 Sf Minimum, Including Drains, Coping And Flashing. Built Up Roofing Can Either Be Hot Or Cold Applied. B. The Offeror Shall Also Describe With Dates Laboratory Design For Renovations Of At Least 2,000 Sf Which Include Replacement Or New Fume Hood Installation Of A Fume Hood At Least Four Feet In Width, New Laboratory Grade Casework, New Seamless Flooring, And Plumbing That Includes Either Eye Wash Station Or Safety Showers. Laboratories Shall Be For Commercial Facilities, Federal And State Facilities, Hospitals, And College/universities. High School And Lower School Grade Laboratories Will Not Be Considered. C. The Offeror Shall Describe With Dates Designs That Include Laboratory Facility Mechanical, Plumbing, And Electrical Renovations, Upgrades And Alterations That Include Major Utility Systems, Facility Construction And Reconfiguration, Branch Circuits Of At Least 50 Amperes At 208v Or 480v, 3 Phase Power For Installation Of Specialized Scientific Tools, Equipment And Instrumentation (provide Amperage, Phases, And Voltages In Offer). The Contractor Shall Describe Distribution Of Manifold Specialty Gasses Utilizing At Least One Of The Following (nitrogen, Helium, Compressed Air, Or A Custom Blend) Within The Lab (note Which Gas Was In Manifold). D. The Offeror Shall Describe, With Dates, Life Safety And Code Compliance Of The Following: Ibc And Nfpa Analyses, Access And Egress Analyses, Fire Alarm Systems And Device Designs, Nfpa 13 Fire Suppression System Modification Calculations And New Installations, And Hazardous Detection Systems (radiological Or Toxic Gas Monitoring Systems). Note Which Detection System (radiological Or Toxic Gas Monitoring System) Is Being Referenced. factor 2: Professional Qualifications page Limit – 17 Pages the Offeror Shall Demonstrate The Technical Expertise And Professional Qualifications Of Its Proposed Team, Including Subcontractors And Consultants, To Perform The Required A/e Services By Providing Résumés (section E Of The Sf330) For All Of The Following Disciplines: principle senior Architect senior Cost Estimator senior Civil Engineer senior Electrical Engineer senior Fire Protection Engineer senior Geo-technical Engineer senior Laboratory Planner mechanical Engineer (piping) senior Mechanical Engineer (piping) senior Mechanical Engineer (hvac) senior Environmental Engineer senior Scheduler senior Surveyor senior Water Proofing Engineer senior Structural Engineer 2. Senior Positions Of Each Discipline Shall Have A Minimum Of Ten (10) Years Applicable Experience And Shall Be Licensed And/or Certified In Their Applicable Discipline. 3. The Offeror Shall Identify The Roles Of Its Key Personnel By Provide Resumes/sf 330s For Its Proposed Key Personnel That Include Credentials, Education, Registrations, Relevant Experience, And Their Role In Performing Requirements Outlined In Factor 1. 4. The Offeror Shall Submit An Organizational Chart Showing The Interrelations Of The Proposed Team Including All Subcontractors And Consultants. factor 3: Geographical Location page Limit – 1 offeror Shall Be Within 50 Miles Of The Nist Main Campus In Gaithersburg, Md. Nist Address Is 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, Md 20899. Offeror Shall Demonstrate This Distance By Submitting Information (driving) Via An Internet Mapping Program. The Driving Shall Begin At The Offeror’s Office To Nist. factor 4: Capacity page Limit – 2 Pages the Offeror Shall Describe Their Team, Including Subcontractors, Capability To Complete Simultaneous Tasks Within The Required Timeframe Based On Current And Planned Workload And Expected Backlog. the Offeror Shall Confirm That There Is Sufficient Capacity Within The Firm, Or That Additional Professional Capacity Can Be Increased As Needed In A Timely Manner To Deliver Projects That Meet The Government’s Specialized Requirements. factor 5: Past Performance page Limit – None offeror Shall Provide Past Performance Information For The Relevant Projects Identified In Their Factor 1 – Specialized Experience Submission In The Form Of Either A Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (cpars) Report Or The Provided Past Performance Questionnaires (ppqs). if The Project Was Completed For The Federal Government, The Offeror Shall Provide A Copy Of The Most Recently Completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (cpars) Report. if No Cpars Is Available, Offeror Shall Use The Provided Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq). Ppqs Shall Be Completed And Signed By The Customer Identified In The Relevant Project. Limit Of One Ppq Per Project. if An Offeror Submits Incomplete Past Performance Or Fails To Submit Any Past Performance Information, The Government May Evaluate Past Performance Based On The Information Obtained Concerning The Offerors’ Performance Relevant To Services Similar In Scope, Complexity, And Size For The Prime Contractor. Additionally, The Following Resources Will Be Used For Evaluation: contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (cpars), Or Similar Systems Of Other Government Departments And Agencies, interviews Within Nist If Offeror Holds/held Previous Contracts, interviews With Program Managers And Contracting Officers, And; other Sources Known To The Government, Including Commercial Sources. in The Case Of An Offeror Without A Cpars Record Of Relevant Past Performance Or For Whom Information On Past Performance Is Not Available, The Offeror Shall Be Rated Neither Favorably Nor Unfavorably. part Ii: Oral Presentations in Accordance With Far 36.602-3, The Government Will Hold Discussions With At Least Three Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms (firms Within The Competitive Range). More Details Related To The Presentations Will Be Provide To The Firms That Are Selected To Move Forward. fee Proposal only Those Firms Selected For Award Will Be Invited To Provide A Fee Proposal. Firms Shall Submit Along With Their Fee Proposal A Copy Of Audited Overhead Rate Statement Prepared In Accordance With The Federal Acquisition Regulation (far), Part 31 For The Prime And Their Sub-consultants. The Audit Must Be From A Federal, State, Local Government Or An Independent Third-party Auditor In Accordance With Far 31. Audit Conducted In Accordance With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (gaap) Will Not Be Accepted.

Details: Synopsis: Request For Architectural And Engineer Sf330 Submission. solicitation: 36c2552r00031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: this Ae Services Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Brooks Act (public Law 0582) And Implemented In Accordance With The Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Subpart 36. Firms Will Be Selected Based On Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Required Work Per The Evaluation Factors Listed Below. this Procurement Is Restricted To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms. This Requirement Is Being Procured In Accordance With The Vaam 836.6 Implemented In Far Subpart 36.6. this Is Not A Request For Proposal (rfp) And An Award Will Not Be Made With This Announcement. This Announcement Is A Request For Sf330 S From Qualified Contractors Who Meet The Professional Requirements Listed Herein. the Selection Criteria For This Acquisition Will Be In Accordance With Far 36 And Are Listed Below In Descending Order Of Importance. The Government Will Not Pay Nor Reimburse Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement. The Contract Is Anticipated To Be Awarded By March 31, 2025. award Of Any Resultant Contract Is Contingent Upon The Availability Of Funds. no Solicitation Document Is Available And No Other Information Pertaining To Project Scope Is Available. Any Request For Assistance With Submission Or Other Procedural Matters Shall Be Submitted Via Email Only To Kevin.mahoney3@va.gov Personal Visits To Discuss This Announcement Will Not Be Allowed. the Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541310 Architect Services With A Small Business Size Standard Of $12.5 Million. Award Of A Firm Fixed Price Contract Is Anticipated. Anticipated Time For Completion Of Design Is Approximately 180 Calendar Days After The Notice To Proceed Has Been Issued Including Time For Va Reviews. The Ae Firm Shall Also Be Required To Perform Construction Period Services If Award Of A Construction Project Contract Is Made. database Registration Information: verification Of Status Of The Offeror Shall Be Accomplished Before Review Of Sf 330. This Acquisition Is 100% Set-aside For Qualified Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business. Only Architect-engineer Businesses Inc Compliance With Vaar 852.219-10 Are Eligible. Only A/e Firms Verified And Listed In The Sba Vendor Information Pages Database, (veteran Small Business Certification (sba.gov), Shall Be Considered. Firms Not Verified At The Time Of Receipt Of The Sf 330 In The Sba Veteran Small Business Certification Program Shall Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. system For Award Management (sam): federal Acquisition Registrations Require That Federal Contractors Register In The System For Award Management (sam) Database At Https://sam.gov/content/ And Enter All Mandatory Information Into The System. Award Cannot Be Made Until The Contractor Has Registered. Offerors Shall Be Actively Registered In Sam Prior To Submitting Their Qualifications Package. Any Firm Not Actively Registered In Sam By The Date Of Receipt Of The Sf 330 Shall Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. the Excluded Parties List System (epls): to Ensure That The Individuals Providing Services Under The Contract Have Not Engaged In Fraud Or Abuse Regarding Sections 1128 And1128a Of The Social Security Act Regarding Federal Health Care Programs, The Contractor Is Required To Check The Excluded Parties List System (epls) Located At Https://sam.gov/content/ For Each Person Providing Services Under This Contract. Further The Contractor Is Required To Certify That All Persons Listed In The Qualifications Package Have Been Compared Against The Epls List And Are Not Listed. During The Performance Of This Contract The Contractor Is Prohibited From Using Any Individual Or Business Listed On The List Of Excluded Individuals/entities. e-verify System: companies Awarded A Contract With The Federal Government Shall Be Required To Enroll In E-verify Within 30 Days Of The Contract Award Date. They Shall Also Need To Begin Using The E-verify System To Confirm That All Of Their New Hires And Their Employees Directly Working On Federal Contracts Are Authorized To Legally Work In The United States. E-verify Is An Internet-based System That Allows An Employer, Using Information Reported On An Employee's Form I-9, To Determine The Eligibility Of That Employee To Work In The United States. There Is No Charge To Employers To Use E-verify. (far 52.222-54) a-e Firms Are Required To Respond If Interested By Submitting One (1) Completed Standard Form 330 Qualification Package Parts I And Ii To Include All Consultants (form Available On-line At: Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116486. Must Include In Part I Section H An Organizational Chart Of The Firm (excludes Consultants), And Information Pertaining To A Design Quality Management Plan. Submission Information Incorporated By Reference Shall Not Be Considered. All Submissions Shall Be Made Electronically. Packages Which Are Hand Delivered Or Delivered Via Surface Mail Or Any Other Method Other Than Electronically Shall Not Be Reviewed. completed Package Shall Be Delivered Electronically On Or Before January 31, 2025 At 2:00pm Central Time To: Kevin.mahoney3@va.gov Hard Copies Shall Not Be Accepted. The Email Subject Line Shall Clearly Identify The Sf330 Request Number: 36c25525r0031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: the Size Of The Pdf Document Must Be Below 10 Mg Or The Va Email Will Error Out And Reject The Application. It Is The Contractor S Responsibility To Ensure That The Application Is Received. Only One Email Will Be Accepted From Each Firm (contractor). evaluation Factors: selection Criteria Are In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 36.602-1 And Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 836.602-1. Prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages Using Additional Pages As Necessary. Sf 330 Submissions Including Any Additional Pages Are Not To Exceed Fifty (50) Pages Exclusive Of Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Each Side Of A Piece Of Paper Is One Page (i.e., Two Pages To A Single Sheet Of Paper). Blank Pages Are Not Included In The Count. sf330 Submission Packages Which Exceed 50 Pages Will Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. The Only Exclusions To The 50-page Limit As Listed In The Request For Sf330 Are: Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Title Page Shall Not Exceed More Than One (1) Page. Table Of Contents Shall Only Contain The Information Necessary To Define The Contents Of The Document. Divider Pages May Contain A Maximum Of One (1) Line Of Description. Responses Must Reference 36c25525r0031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages And The Information Contained Herein. qualifications (sf330) Submitted By Each Firm For 36c25525r0031 And Project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Will Be Reviewed And Evaluated Based On The Following Evaluation Criteria Listed Below: evaluation Factors For Sf330 Review Submitted For project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Selection Criteria Are In Accordance With Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) Part 36.602-1 And Va Acquisition Regulation (vaar) Part 836.602-1. Prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages Using Additional Pages As Necessary. Sf 330 Submissions Including Any Additional Pages Are Not To Exceed Fifty (50) Pages Exclusive Of Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Each Side Of A Piece Of Paper Is One Page (i.e., Two Pages To A Single Sheet Of Paper). Blank Pages Are Not Included In The Count. sf330 Submission Packages Which Exceed 50 Pages Will Be Considered Non-responsive And Shall Be Excluded From Further Consideration. The Only Exclusions To The 50-page Limit As Listed In The Request For Sf330 Are: Table Of Contents, Title Page, And Divider Pages. Title Page Shall Not Exceed More Than One (1) Page. Table Of Contents Shall Only Contain The Information Necessary To Define The Contents Of The Document. Divider Pages May Contain A Maximum Of One (1) Line Of Description. Responses Must Reference 36c25525r0031 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Sf330 Request Information For Project 589a7-25-501: prospective Firms Are Required To Address All Selection Criteria Within Submitted Sf 330 Packages And The Information Contained Herein. qualifications (sf330) Submitted By Each Firm For 36c25525r0031 And Project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces Will Be Reviewed And Evaluated Based On The Following Evaluation Criteria Listed Below: evaluation Factors For Sf330 Review Submitted For project 589a7-25-501 Renovate Restrooms And Lactation Spaces professional Qualifications: The Qualifications Of The Individuals Which Will Be Used For These Services Will Be Examined For Experience And Education And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. Ae Firms Shall Have Professional Architects, Engineers, And Consultants Who Are Licensed In The United States Of America. Current And Valid License Information Must Be Provided. The Evaluation Shall Consider The Specific Experience (minimum Of Five Years) And Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, And Experience Relevant To A Project Of This Size And Scope) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project. key Positions And Disciplines For This Project Which Will Be Evaluated Include, But Are Not Limited To: architect/designer interior Design electrical Engineer project Manager plumbing Engineer mechanical Engineer fire Protection Engineer quality Assurance industrial Hygienist cost Estimator a/e Firms Are Required To Develop Their Own Team Based Upon Their Understanding Of The Project Requirements And Not Solely Upon The Previous List. specialized Experience And Technical Competence: A/e Firms Must Have Specific Design Experience And Technical Skill In The Type And Scope Of Work Required For Renovations And New Construction At Existing Medical Facilities, Including, Where Appropriate, Renovating Space For Patient Privacy And Rehabilitation Services, Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, Waste Reduction, And The Use Of Recovered Materials. Experience And Qualifications Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. Ae Firms With Demonstrated Experience Of Higher Numbers Of Team Members Who Are Key Personnel Working Together On Past Projects Will Receive A Higher Score Than Those That Do Not Demonstrated Experience Of Higher Numbers Of Team Members Who Are Key Personnel Working Together On Past Projects. submissions Shall Include No More And No Less Than One (1) And No More Than Three (3) Recent And Relevant Government And Private Experience Projects Similar In Size Scope And Complexity, And Experience With The Type Of Projects/competence Above That Were Completed By The Ae Firm Submitting The 330 S. Relevant Is Defined As Those Task Requirements Identified In The Project Description. Recent Is Defined As Design And Construction Period For Projects That Are Both Design And Construction Complete Within The Past 5 (five) Years. Each Project Shall Include The Following: project Title, Contract Number, Location And Detailed Narrative Describing The Scope Of Services Provided Including The Type Of Work Performed By The Offeror And Its Role In The Project I.e., Prime Contract, Teaming Partner, Or Subcontractor. project Owner, Owner S Point Of Contact Including Telephone Number And Email Address. services & Deliverables Provided Under The Contract/task Order. period Of Performance, Including Start And Completion Dates. total Dollar Value Of The Project For Both The Award Cost And Final (completed) Cost. federal, State, Or Private Enterprise Contract? the Evaluation Will Also Consider Narratives Addressing The Following Topics In Section H. Simply Re-stating This List In Section H Will Not Be Sufficient. The Narrative Of How The Firm Addresses Each Of These Will Be Evaluated. the Management Approaches. the Coordination Of Disciplines And Subcontractors quality Control Procedures, And familiarity With Va Design Guides/manuals, Master Specifications, And Other Applicable Federal, State, And Local Standards. capacity: The Prime Contractor Will Be Evaluated To Determine If It Has The General Workload And Staffing Capacity Within Its Design Office Which Will Be Responsible For The Design To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time.â  In Accordance With Vaar 852.219-75:  in The Case Of A Contract For Services (except Construction), The Contractor Will Not Pay More Than 50% Of The Amount Paid By The Government To It To Firms That Are Not Vip-listed Sdvosbs As Set Forth In 852.219-73.  any Work That A Similarly Situated Vip-listed Subcontractor Further Subcontracts Will Count Towards The 50% Subcontract Amount That Cannot Be Exceeded.   Prime Contractor Must Include Its Certification Of Compliance With The Limitations On Subcontracting Specified In 852.219-75 With Its 330 Submissions. past Performance: Provide Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Project Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. Information Presented Must Clearly Demonstrate The Construction Cost Limit, A/e Created Cost Estimate, And Final Awarded Cost Of The Project. past Performance Will Be Evaluated For All Projects Provided In Section F. The Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Database Will Be Reviewed To Evaluate The Projects That Have A Cpars Entry. Cpars Are Not Required To Be Submitted With The Sf330 Submission. The Contract Number For The Project Must Be Submitted With Each Project In Section F So Cpars Can Be Reviewed In The Database. for Any Project That Does Not Have Cpars Data Available, A Past Performance Questionnaire (ppq) May Be Submitted With The Sf330. The Ppq Should Be Rated And Signed By The Evaluator. If A Firm Does Not Receive A Requested Complete Ppq From An Evaluator Prior To The Time For Submission, The Firm Shall Submit The Partially Completed Ppq With Section 1 And The Evaluator Information In Section 2 Completed. Ensure A Poc Is Listed With The Project Title/contract Number. The Va Will Make Reasonable Attempts To Contact The Poc Upon Submission For Ppq Completion. evaluations May Also Include Additional Performance Related From The Firm, Customer Inquiries, Government Databases, Publicly Available Sources, And Additional Projects In Cpars. The Government Reserves The Right To Contact Any Poc Listed On A Cpars Report Or Ppq. evaluations Will Consider Ratings On Projects Which Are Design And Construction Complete In The Last Three (3) Years, Information Regarding Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness. failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified. All Projects Provided In The Sf 330 Must Be Completed By The Office/branch/individual Team Member Performing The Work Under This Contract. If Appropriate, The Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services May Be Evaluated. location Of Design Firm: Per Far 36.602-1 Selection Criteria: Market Research Indicates That At Least 3 Qualified Firms Exist Within A 500-mile Radius Of The Wichita Va Medical Center Located At 5500 E. Kellogg, Wichita, Kansas 67218. This Procurement Is Restricted To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms Located Within A 500-mile Radius Of The Robert J. Dole Veterans Affairs Medical Center (vamc) In Wichita, Kansas. Architectural Prime Contractors Whose Primary (i.e., Headquarters, Primary Corporate Office, Main Office) Physical Business Address Is Within A 500-mile Radius From The Wichita Va Medical Center Located At 5500 E. Kellogg, Wichita Kansas 67218 And Resides Within The Borders Of The United States Of America Will Receive A Higher Score On Evaluations. architectural Prime Contractors Whose Primary Physical Business Address Is Outside A 500-mile Radius From The Wichita Va Medical Center Located At 5500 E. Kellogg, Wichita Kansas 67218 And Resides Within The Borders Of The United States Of America Will Receive A Lesser Score On Evaluations. architectural Prime Contractors Are Required To Verify The Primary Physical Business Address (described Above) As Part Of The Sf330 Response. If The Information Cannot Be Verified As Required, The Sf330 Will Be Found To Be Nonresponsive And Will Not Receive Further Consideration. sf 330 Submissions From Companies Located Outside The Borders Of The United States Of America Shall Not Be Considered. claims And Terminations: Any Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Or Terminated Contracts Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services Will Be Examined.

Details: Va - Va Esf Tinkerbell Dam Prep Eng. Svcsnotice Of Intent (a&e Solicitation For Sf330: Doiffb0250021)presolicitation Notice Of Intent. This Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualification Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder¿s List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement.1. Introduction: This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For Pr Number 0044001195 Which Requires Architect And/or Engineering (a&e) Services To Provide Characterization Of The Current Conditions At Tinkerbell Dam On Tinker Creek (roanoke County, Va) In Preparation For Removal Of The Structure. Tinkerbell Dam Is Located Off Of Tinkerbell Lane, In Roanoke County, Virginia And Is Named Ardagh Dam In The Virginia Dam Safety Registry. Tinkerbell Dam Is Approximately 3 M High And Creates And Impoundment That Is Approximately 0.4 Stream Km In Length. This Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Small Business Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541330 - Engineering Services, And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $25.5m. All Information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Is Contained Herein. Federal Acquisition Regulations (far) 36.6 Selection Procedures Apply. The Architectural/engineering Sources Listed Herein Are Being Procured Utilizing The Selection Ofarchitects And Engineer's Statute, Also Known As The Brooks Act Or Qualifications Based Selection (qbs), Far Part 36.6. All Submissions Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With (iaw) The Evaluation Criteria Identified In The Selection Criteria. Only The Top Three (3) Firms Deemed To Be The Most Highly Qualified, After Initial Source Selection, May Be Chosen For Discussions/interviews. Please Note That The Technical Evaluation Board May Choose Not To Engage Firms In Discussions/interviews If The Initial Selection Evaluation Is Determined Sufficient To Proceed Without Conducting Discussions/interviews. Firms Will Be Selected Based On Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Required Work As Submitted.2. Description: Tinkerbell Dam Is Located On Private Property And The Landowner Recently Agreed To Have The Dam Removed. In Order To Prepare For Removal, Several Design Elements Need To Be Completed To Apply For Appropriate Permits And Develop A Construction Bid Package. The Government Is Seeking An A&e Firm To Provide All Professional Services Required To Complete The Following Tasks:1. development Of A Hydraulic Model To Evaluate The Projected Shear Stresses On Streambanks Within The Current Impoundment Upon Dam Removal,2. design Of Any Bank Stabilization And Restoration And/or In-stream Structures Necessary To Ensure Streambank And Long-term Protection Of Buildings Adjacent To The Current Impoundment Upon Dam Removal,3. floodplain Analysis And Appropriate Coordination With Local, State, And Federal Entities Concerned With Changes In The Tinker Creek Floodway Upon Dam Removal, In Order To Receive A Conditional Letter Of Map Revision, If Necessary,4. preparation Of All Engineering Design Plans Required For State, Federal, And Local Permit Applications For Dam Removal, Including Responses To Comments From These Agencies And Plan Revisions, And5. preparation Of Final Engineering Design Plans, Specifications, And Associated Documents To Be Utilized In Preparation Of A Construction Bid Package For Dam Removal.3. Inquiries: Personal Visits For The Purpose Of Discussing This Announcement Will Not Be Entertained Or Scheduled. Selection Shall Be In The Order Of Preference From The Firms Considered Most Highly Qualified. Questions May Be Directed Only By Email To: Jerry_perry@fws.gov4. Selection Process: Sf 330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Selection Criteria As Stated In This Pre-solicitation Notice. These Evaluations Will Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms For This Requirement. In Accordance With Far 36.602-3-(c), Three (3) Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Then Be Notified Of The Government's Intent To (or Not To) Hold Discussions/interviews. If Held, Discussions Will Be Held With The Most Highly Qualified Firms In The Form Determined To Be Most Advantageous And Economical By The Contracting Officer. This May Include In Writing, Via Phone Interview, Or In-person Interview Presentations. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Email And Provided Further Instructions, Including Any Questions Or Topics To Address. Following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated And Ranked For Selection Based On The Selection Criteria, And The Most Highly Qualified Firm Will Be Selected And Subsequently Sent The Solicitation. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Sf 330 Submission For Each Firm, As Well As Additional Information Obtained Via Discussions. A Site Visit May Be Authorized For The Highest Rated Firm During The Negotiation Process At No Cost To The Government. If Negotiations Are Not Successful With The Highest-rated Firm, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until An Award Can Be Made Or The Requirement Is Canceled.5. Submission Requirements: All Responding Firms Are Required To Submit Standard Form 330, Architect-engineer Qualifications, Part I And Part Ii. Instructions And Fillable Copies Of The Sf 330 Document May Be Obtained From The Gsa Forms Library Or On-line At Https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms/architectengineer-qualifications. The Sf 330, Part Imust Clearly Indicate The Office Location Where The Work Will Be Performed, The Qualification Of The Individuals And Subcontractors Proposed To Work On The Contract, And Their Geographical Location.you Must Submit Your Qualifications, And Any Supplemental Information (such As Past Performance, Spreadsheets, Backup Data, And Technical Information), Electronically To Jerry_perry@fws.gov No Later Than: 2:00pm (eastern), Tuesday, January 17, 2025. Email Subject Lines Must Be Labeled: A&e Sol# Doiffb0250021 - Tinkerbell Dam Prep.files Must Be Readable Using The Current Adobe Portable Document Format (pdf). A. Late Sf 330 Submissions Received After The Due Date And/or Time Will Be Handled In Accordance With Far 15.208(b). Please Allow Sufficient Time For Your Sf 330 Package To Be Received Prior To The Proposed Closing Date/time.b. Please See Far 15.207(c) For A Description Of The Steps The Government Shall Take Regarding Unreadable Offers.c. To Avoid Rejection Of An Offer, Vendors Must Make Every Effort To Ensure Their Electronic Submission Is Virus-free.d. Password-protecting Your Offer Is Not Permitted.e. Please Note That The Government Shall Not Accept .zip Files.f. Package Limitations: Sf 330s Shall Be Limited To A Maximum Of Thirty (30), Single Sided, Single-spaced, And Numbered Pages. This Includes A Cover/title Page, Table Of Contents, And Any Other Relevant Information. If More Than Thirty (30) Single-sided Pages Are Submitted, All Pages After Thirty (30) Pages Will Not Be Evaluated. The Font For Text Shall Be Times New Roman 12-point Or Larger.part Ii Of The Sf 330 And Any Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Reports And Past Performance Questionnaires Will Not Count As Part Of The Page Limitations.the Sf 330 Shall Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted.page Limits Apply To The Following Sections Of The Sf 330: Section E - Resumes (limit To 1 Page Per Team Member) Section F - Example Projects (limit To 1 Page Per Project) Section G - Key Personnel Participation In Example Projects (limit 1 Page) Section H - Additional Information (limit This Section To 8 Pages Total) Provide Additional Information Demonstrating The Proposed Team's Qualifications And Past Experience To Fulfill The Contract Requirements.g. All Sf 330 Submissions Must Include The Following Information Either On The Sf 330 Or By Accompanying Document: 1) Cage Code; 2) Unique Entity Identifier (uei); 3) Tax Id Number; 4) Primary Point Of Contact; 5) Email Address And Phone Number Of The Primary Point Of Contact;h. Note: Only Submissions From Small Business Concerns Will Be Acceptable For This Project. To Be Considered, The Firm Must Be Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) And Certified By The Sba As A Small Business Concern; Failure To Accomplish The Aforementioned Tasks By The Time The Sf 330 Is Due Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration As A Proposed Contractor.9. Fws Primary Point Of Contact: Jerry W. Perry, Contracting Officer, Email: Jerry_perry@fws.gov.10. Selection Criteria: The Fws Will Utilize The Following Selection Criteria In Descending Order Of Importance To Evaluate Firms:(a) Technical Proposal - Sf 330 Evaluation - Stage I (pre-selection)factor 1 - Professional Qualification(1) Professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services.a. The A&e Firm Must Be Registered And Licensed To Complete Design Work For Projects Completed In The Commonwealth Of Virginia.b. Specific Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project.c. The A&e Must Have At Least Five (5) Years Of Engineering Experience.d. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure Of Key Personnel Proposed To Complete Work On The Project.factor 2 - Specialized Experience And Technical Competence(2) Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required:a. Specialized Experience And Technical Competence Will Be Evaluated Based On The Team Members' Knowledge, Both Individually And Collectively As A Team. Experience Should Include: I. Experience And Knowledge Of The Tasks Identified In Paragraph 2 Of This Notice Ii. Facility Upgrades Iii. Construction Inspection Services V. Site Investigations Vi. Life Safety And Certification Services And Reports Vii. Construction And Renovations, Including Demolitionb. Firms Shall Submit Project Information On At Least Three (3) But No More Than Five (5) Designs For Projects That Best Match The Scope Of This Project. Designs Must Be Complete Or Substantially Complete Prior To The Due Date Of This Pre-solicitation Notice Of Intent.c. Describe Processes In Relation To Design Quality Management Procedures, Computer-aided Design And Drafting/building Information Modeling, Building Information Modeling, Equipment Resources, And Any Proposed Subcontractors.factor 3 - Schedule And Capacity(3) Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. Provide The Following Items To Demonstrate Capacity:a. Provide Project Lists For Designs In Progress Or Completed By The Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project; Indicate How The Team Accomplishes Multiple, Large, And Small Projects Simultaneously, At Different Locations, Within Required Timeframes.b. Provide The Number Of And Types Of Employees (prime And Subcontractor), Including The Availability Of Additional Competent, Regular Employees For Support Of Projects, And The Depth And Size Of The Organization.c. For Any Work Awarded By Fws, Provide Volume Of Work During The Previous 12 Months To The Prime And All Subcontractors.factor 4 - Relevant Past Performance(4) Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules. A. Submit The Prime Firm's Past Performance Information To Determine The Degree To Which It Demonstrates The Likelihood It Can Successfully Perform The Requirements Of The Work As Described Herein. Submit Evaluation Information For All Projects Submitted For Factor 2, Specialized Experience, And Technical Competence. If Unable To Obtain A Completed Cpars, Past Performance Questionnaires (ppq) Are Acceptable. Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document. If Unable To Obtain A Completed Ppq For A Factor 2 Project, Provide The Customer's Contact Information Along With The Contract Information. In The Case Of A Joint Venture, Llc, Or Other Teaming Arrangement Formed For The Purpose Of Competing For This Contract, The Government Will Evaluate The Past Performance Of The Entities That Comprise The Newly Formed Entity. The Government Will Use The Information Either Furnished By The Offeror And Reference(s) And/or Information Obtained From Other Independent Data Sources In Evaluating Past Performance.b. Submit Any Performance Rating Information, Especially For Fws Projects, As Well As Information About The Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness.c. Submit Any Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services.d. For Firms Without A Record Of Relevant Past Performance Or For Whom Relevant Past Performance Information Is Not Available, The Firm Will Not Be Evaluated Favorably Or Unfavorably. However, Firms Must Document Having At Least Five (5) Years Of Experience.e. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified.factor 5 - Location(5) Location In The General Geographical Area Of The Project And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Project; Provided, That Application Of The Criterion Leaves An Appropriate Number Of Qualified Firms Given The Nature And Size Of The Project.a. Firms Must Demonstrate Knowledge Of The Locality Which May Include State Licenses Or Projects Completed For Designs Of Projects Within The State Where The Design Shall Be Constructed.(b) Priced Proposal - Stage Iifactor 6 - Price(1) price. When Requested By The Contracting Officer, And Following Evaluations Of Stage I, Sf 330s, The Offeror Shall Submit A Price Proposal On The Schedule For Each Item. When Completing The Price Schedule Of The Item(s), The Offeror Shall Provide Fully Loaded Labor Rates. Fully Loaded Rates Shall Include Wages, Overhead, General, Administrative Expenses, And Profit.table 1. Rating Evaluation Factors:adjectival Descriptionoutstandingproposal Meets Requirements And Indicates An Exceptional Approach, Understanding And Capability Of The Requirements. Strengths Far Outweigh Any Weaknesses. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is Very Low.excellentproposal Meets Requirements And Indicates A Thorough Approach, Understanding And Capability Of The Requirements. Proposal Contains Strengths Which Outweigh Any Weaknesses. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is Low.acceptableproposal Meets Requirements And Indicates An Adequate Approach, Understanding, And Capability Of The Requirements. Strengths And Weaknesses Are Offsetting Or Will Have Little Or No Impact On Contract Performance. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is No Worse Than Moderate.marginalproposal Does Not Clearly Meet Requirements And Has Not Demonstrated An Adequate Approach, Understanding And Capability Of The Requirements. The Proposal Has One Or More Weaknesses Which Are Not Offset By Strengths. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is High.unacceptable Proposal Does Not Meet Requirements And Contains One Or More Deficiencies. Proposal Will Not Result In An Award.neutral (for Past Performance Only)no Recent/relevant Performance Record Is Available, Or The Offeror's Performance Record Is So Sparse That No Meaningful Confidence Assessment Rating Can Be Reasonably Assigned.

Details: This Is A Special Notice – For Informational Purposes Only. the Purpose Of This Special Notice Is To Share With Industry An Upcoming Land Port Of Entry Project In Region 05, Located In International Falls, Minnesota. this Special Notice Is For Informational Purposes Only And Shall Not Be Construed As A Solicitation Or As An Obligation Or Commitment By The Government. Depending On Market Research And Other Influences, Gsa Anticipates Issuing A Solicitation For This Project Around Spring 2025. this Is Not A Request For Offers Or Proposals. The Government Does Not Intend To Award A Contract Based On Responses And The Government Is Not Obligated To And Will Not Pay For Information Received As A Result Of This Special Notice. project Location: international Falls, Land Port Of Entry 2 Second Ave international Falls, Mn 56649 project Description: the Anticipated Project Is A New Land Port Of Entry Facility On The Northern Border In Minnesota. The Proposed Site Is In International Falls, Adjacent To An Existing Land Port Of Entry. This New Project Will Be A Gateway To Our Country And Will Transform An Obsolete Border Facility Into A State-of-the-art Commercial Port Of Entry, Which Will Improve Safety And Security For Both Vehicular And Pedestrian Traffic. It Shall Make A Distinct Architectural Statement That Is Responsive To The Efficient Movement Of Trade And Commerce, The Security Requirements Of Law Enforcement Agencies, And The Welcoming Of Visitors And Citizens To The United States Of America. The Intended Delivery Method Is Design-bid-build With A Lump Sum Firm-fixed Price. the Department Of Homeland Security (dhs) - Customs And Border Protection (cbp) Is The Current Tenant, And The Department Of Agriculture Plant Protection And Quarantine (usda) And U.s. Food And Drug Administration (fda) Will Be Joining Cbp As New Tenants At The New Lpoe. The Existing Facility Was Constructed In 1993, And Operates 24 Hours A Day, 7 Days Per Week. Although The Existing Land Port Of Entry Is Only Roughly 30 Years Old, It Was Designed And Constructed Several Years Before The Creation Of Dhs Which Resulted In Significant Changes To The Way Business Operations Occur At The Border. This Project Represents An Opportunity To Support The Supply Chain; International Falls Has The Highest Traffic Volume Of Any Port In Minnesota. In 2021, The Port Facilitated Over $12 Billion Worth Of Trade. By Redesigning And Expanding The Port’s Infrastructure, The Port Will Be Able To Accommodate Higher Volumes Of Trade. the Project Will Achieve Leed Gold Certification Or Higher. To Achieve That Sustainability Goal, The Project Intends To Specify Energy Efficient Products/systems, Use Environmentally Preferable Products, Protect And Conserve Water, Enhance Indoor Air Quality, And Other Scope Elements That Apply To Various Leed Credits. The Newly Designed Port Will Increase Vehicle And Pedestrian Processing Efficiency And Capacity; Reduce Traffic Queues And Delays In Both Directions; Minimize Conflict Points Among Passenger Vehicles, Commercial Vehicles, Trains, Buses, And Pedestrians; Add A Functional Secondary Inspection Area For Commercial Vehicles; And Accommodate Safety, Security, Technology, And Future Demand. The Site Expansion Will Also Provide Area For Additional Customer Tenant Agencies, Including The U.s. Department Of Agriculture (usda)and The Food And Drug Administration (fda). for Additional Information, Please Visit: Https://www.gsa.gov/real-estate/gsa-properties/land-ports-of-entry-and-the-bil/bipartisan-infrastructure-law-construction-project/minnesota to Keep Up To Date With This Project, Please Select “follow” At The Top Of This Page. for Any Other Questions Or Concerns, Please Contact Contracting Officer Anna Vanko At Anna.vanko@gsa.gov. follow Gsa Region 5: gsa Great Lakes Facebook -https://www.facebook.com/gsa gsa Great Lakes “x”/twitter -https://x.com/usgsa delivery Method design-bid-build scope Summary the General Construction (gc) Scope Of Work Includes All Labor And Materials Required To Provide Construction Services For The International Falls Land Port Of Entry Project. The Services Requested Of The Gc Shall Cover A Wide Range Of Construction Activities As Defined Below. the Gc Shall Be A Member Of The Project Team Throughout Construction And Turnover/closeout Stages. The Gc Selected For This Project Shall Work In Alignment With The Gsa And Gsa’s Selected Team, Including The Architect And Engineer (a/e) Firm And The Construction Manager As Agent (cma). The Services Requested Of The Gc Will Cover A Wide Range Of Activities During Construction And Turnover/closeout Stages, Such As Work Phasing Reviews, Scheduling, Coordinating The Work Of Subcontractors, And General Construction Services. The Gc Shall Be Responsible For The Administration Of All Construction And Closeout Stages. the Design For The Project Will Conform To The Federal Building Design Standards, 2021 Facilities Standards For The Public Buildings Service P-100, And Other Building Codes And Standards As Applicable To This Project. Design Services Will Be Accomplished Through A Separate Contract, Will Be Necessary To Meet The Functional Requirements Of Prospective Tenants, Fulfill Policy And Regulatory Criteria, And Provide State Of The Art Workplaces That Help Define Interior Design Standards For The Building. Designed Solutions Shall Be Consistent With The Latest Objectives Of Gsa, Prospective Tenants, And Best Practices In Architectural Planning And Design. the Project Is Funded Under The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (bil) And The Inflation Reduction Act (ira). this Is Not A Request For Proposal

Details: Gsa Has Identified A Need For Construction Services For A Project At The Mid-atlantic Social Security Center In Philadelphia, Pa. The Work Involves Renovations To The Northwest, Northeast, South, And Southeast Plazas As Well As The Replacement Of Sections Of Steel Girder That Support The First Floor And Are Accessible From The Loading Dock Area And Adjacent Rooms. The Matssc Facility Is A 7-story Office Building With A Basement Level Parking Garage, Loading Dock, Training Rooms, Warehouse And Mechanical Equipment Rooms. Gsa Has Engaged An Architect Engineer (a/e) To Design The Project. Gsa Will Use A Two-phase Process Issuing A 50% Design Package That Contains Sufficient Detail To Allow It To Solicit Phase 1 Technical Proposals Only, And Not Price. Upon Completion Of The Evaluation Of The Phase I Technical Proposals, An Advisory Shortlist Will Be Developed. All Offerors Will Be Notified As To Whether Their Firm Will Be Invited To Participate In The Resultant Acquisition Or, Based On The Information Submitted, That It Is Unlikely To Be A Viable Competitor. It Will Be Noted That Exclusion From The Advisory Shortlist Shall Not Preclude Offerors From Submitting A Phase Ii Price Proposal. Once The 100% Design Documents Are Complete. Gsa Will Solicit Phase Ii Price Proposals From The Firms That Submitted Phase 1 Technical Proposals. 100% Design Document Completion Date Is Tbd. the Work Will Involve Multiple Trades Including General Construction, Mechanical, Electrical, Ect. The Contractor Will Be Required To Have The Ability To Successfully Coordinate All Trade/subcontractor Work And Complete This Project Within All Applicable Government Guidelines Governing The Work. The Naics Code For The Construction Work Is 236220 – “commercial And Institutional Building Construction. disclosure Of Magnitude Of Construction Projects the Estimated Total Construction Cost For The Project Is More Than $10,000,000. competitive Procedures this Procurement Will Be Competed Utilizing Full And Open Competition In Accordance With Far 6.203. Competitive Proposals Will Be Requested In Accordance With Far 15 “contracting By Negotiations.” selection Procedures the Award Will Be Made Utilizing The Tradeoff Process Prescribed In Far 15.101-1. The Objective Of The Source Selection Process Is To Select A Proposal That Represents The Best Value To The Government. The Award Will Be Made To The Responsible Offeror Whose Proposal Conforms To The Solicitation And Offers The Best Value To The Government, Considering The Price And Non-price Factors. For This Procurement, The Technical Factors Will Be Substantially More Important Than Price (far 15.101-1, Trade Offs). The Technical Factors Will Include: project Management Plan And Approach prior Experience On Relevant Projects past Performance On Relevant Projects socioeconomic Status sustainability gsa Requires A Bid Guarantee In Accordance With Far 52.228-1 With Each Offeror’s Proposal. gsa Requires Performance And Payment Bonds Prior To The Issuance Of The Notice To Proceed. procurement Schedule a Virtual Pre-proposal Conference Will Be Held On December 18, 2024 At 10:00am Est Via Google Meet. A Link Will Be Provided To Interested Parties By December 17th. Please Contact Stephen.zorzi@gsa.gov And Stephen.kohri@gsa.gov If You Would Like To Attend. site Visit Will Be Held On January 8th, 2025 At 9:00 Am Est. rfis Are Due By 5pm Est On January 15, 2023. Further Information Regarding Who To Send The Rfis To Will Be Provided At The Pre-proposal Conference. technical Proposals Are Due By 5:00 Pm Est On January 28, 2025 Tostephen.zorzi@gsa.gov And Stephen.kohri@gsa.gov. period Of Performance the Period Of Performance From The Issuance Of The Notice To Proceed To Substantial Completion Is 861 Days. small Business Set Aside And Applicable Naics Code the Award Is A Complete Set-aside For Small Business Concerns Pursuant To Far 6.203. The Applicable Naics Code Is 236220, Commercial And Institutional Building Construction, And The Small Business Size Standard Is $45 Million. pre-proposal Conference & Site Visit/investigation For Contractors prior Notification Of Attendance To The Pre-proposal Conference Is Mandatory. You Will Be Asked To Provide Your Company’s Name And All Potential Attendees' Full Names (no More Than 3 Per Firm) To Stephen.zorzi@gsa.gov And Stephen.kohri@gsa.govby No Later Than The Day Before The Event. interested Parties/how To Offer this Solicitation Is Only Be Available Electronically. Through Sam.gov, A Secure Website Designed To Safeguard Sensitive But Unclassified (sbu) Acquisition Material. Potential Offerors Are Responsible For Downloading The Solicitation And For Monitoring The Website For Possible Amendments And/or Additional Information. Potential Offerors Must Register On The.sam.gov Website To Have Access To Solicitation Material. For Additional Registration Information, Visit The Sam.gov Website. to Ensure That You Receive All Information Regarding This Solicitation, Please Register To Receive Updates At Sam.gov, And Follow The Procedures For Notification Registration. request For Information all Inquiries Concerning The Project Shall Be Directed To The Following Email Addresses: Stephen.zorzi@gsa.gov And Stephen.kohri@gsa.gov.

Description: Contract notice – General guideline, standard regulation Open procedure (services) Procurement of support services for IT procedures of the HMDIS, HMSI, HMFG, HMD and platform operations for customers in the HZD in five lots Procurement of support services for IT proc ... Additional procurement of support services for IT procedures of the HMDIS, HMSI, HMFG, HMD and platform operations for customers in the HZD in five lots Procurement of support services for IT procedures of the HMDIS, HMSI, HMFG, HMD and platform operations for customers in the HZD in five lots Enterprise Architect The following services are to be procured. As an "enterprise architect container construction and operation with Kubernetes clusters in enterprise environments, multicloud experience", the following requirements are made in particular: - At least three years of professional experience in the area of deployment, management and scaling of containerized applications - At least three years of professional experience in the area of installation and operation of Linux operating systems - At least three years of professional experience in the area of software development and version management for Git-based software projects - At least eight years of experience in the provision and administration of specialist applications, from a technical and specialist point of view At least three years of experience in the provision of procedures using container technology on Kubernetes - At least four years of experience with administration in enterprise server environments - At least three years of experience with data backup issues in container environments - At least two years of experience with BPMN tools - At least two years of experience with high availability requirements in Kubernetes clusters - At least two years of experience in the deployment of monitoring tools - At least one year of experience With 24*7 procedures - At least one year of experience in the application of incident, problem, change and release management processes in accordance with ITIL/ITSM - At least two years of experience in the creation and maintenance of technical concepts, documentation and architectures - Good knowledge of operational processes in accordance with ITIL or ITSM - Good knowledge of the German language, both written and spoken, as well as knowledge of English, which enables the use of manufacturer information or Internet specialist forums - Good knowledge of IT security in accordance with BSI standards or comparable IT security standards of other EU countries - Deployment and configuration of monitoring tools such as Kibana, Grafana, Prometheus and others - Two years of experience in the implementation of API interfaces, vulnerability analysis and fixing of containers - Two years of experience with transport standards in public administration - Confident use of Ansible or similar scripting languages - Know-how in the configuration and operation of container-based applications with DBMS - Knowledge of Rancher, Mirantis and Ansible Further details can be found in the service description. Process migration and container operation on Kubernetes. Services are to be procured below. As an "operator of container processes and migration specialist with distributed infrastructure", the following requirements in particular are made: - At least three years of professional experience in the deployment, management and scaling of containerized applications - At least three years of professional experience in the installation and operation of Linux operating systems - At least three years of professional experience in the software development and version management for Git-based software projects - In-depth knowledge of an enterprise environment acquired in at least eight years of professional experience - At least five years of experience in the use of ITIL tools and within the framework of ITIL processes - At least three years of experience with various container technologies - At least five years of experience with hybrid IT environments - At least three years of experience with nationwide IT cooperations - At least three years of experience with SharePoint, JIRA and FISbox - Good knowledge of operating processes according to ITIL or ITSM - Good knowledge of the German language, both written and spoken, as well as knowledge of English, which enables the use of manufacturer information or Enable internet specialist forums - Good knowledge in the area of IT security in accordance with BSI standards or comparable IT security standards of other EU states - Deployment and configuration of monitoring tools - Two years of experience in implementing API interfaces - Vulnerability analysis and fixing of containers - Two years of experience with transport standards in public administration - Knowledge in the areas of Rancher, Mirantis and Ansible Further details can be found in the service description. BPMN tool specialist Services are to be procured below. As a BPMN tool specialist, the following requirements are particularly important: - At least three years of professional experience in the deployment, management and scaling of containerized applications - At least three years of professional experience in the installation and operation of Linux operating systems - At least three years of professional experience in the field of software development and version management for Git-based software projects - At least four years of professional experience with BPMN tools and process orchestration - At least four years of experience with process analysis - At least two years of experience with Camunda - At least one year of experience in complex network environments At least four years of experience with customer meetings - At least two years of experience with IT security requirements - Good knowledge of operational processes according to ITIL or ITSM (ideally ITIL Foundation) in accordance with section 4.1 - Good knowledge of the German language, both written and spoken, as well as knowledge of English, which enables the use of manufacturer information or Internet specialist forums - Good knowledge of IT security in accordance with BSI standards or comparable IT security standards of other EU countries - Deployment and configuration of monitoring tools - Two years of experience in implementing API interfaces - Vulnerability analysis and fixing of containers - Two years of experience with transport standards in public administration - Knowledge in the areas of Rancher, Mirantis and Ansible Further details can be found in the service description. Platform specialist Services are to be procured below. As an operator of a Kubernetes platform on which several container processes with heterogeneous infrastructure are operated, the following requirements in particular are made: - At least three years of professional experience in the deployment, management and scaling of containerized applications - At least three years of professional experience in the installation and operation of Linux operating systems - At least three years of professional experience in the area of software development and version management for Git-based software projects - At least two years of practical experience in the operation of Docker applications and medium-sized processes in container operation - At least two years of practical experience in dealing with Kubernetes - At least two years of practical experience in dealing with at least one other Kubernetes derivative - At least two years of practical experience in container management - At least two years of experience in the deployment and configuration of monitoring tools - At least two years of experience in monitoring container applications with Prometheus, Grafana, Elasticsearch, Kibana - At least three years of experience in Linux administration - Good knowledge of operational processes According to ITIL or ITSM - Good knowledge of the German language, both written and spoken, as well as knowledge of English, which enables the use of manufacturer information or Internet specialist forums - Good knowledge in the area of IT security in accordance with BSI standards or comparable IT security standards of other EU countries - Deployment and configuration of monitoring tools such as Kibana, Grafana, Prometheus and others - Two years of experience in implementing API interfaces - Vulnerability analysis and fixing of containers - Two years of experience with transport standards of public administration - Confident handling of scripting - Practical experience of at least six months or practiced routine in reverse proxy configuration - Practical experience of at least six months or practiced routine in configuration of Ingress Server - Practical experience of at least six months or practiced routine in Git workflows - Confident handling of INFRASTRUCTURE-AS-CODE - Solid knowledge of SQL basics - Solid knowledge of network basics - Experience of at least six months in the use of INFRASTRUCTURE tools in the context of ITIL processes - At least three months' experience in contributing to IT security concepts, load tests and penetration tests - Knowledge of Rancher, Mirantis and Ansible Further details can be found in the service description. Senior Platform Specialist Services are to be procured below. As a senior platform specialist for a Kubernetes platform, the following requirements in particular are made: - At least three years of professional experience in the deployment, management and scaling of containerized applications - At least three years of professional experience in the installation and operation of Linux operating systems - At least three years of professional experience in the area of software development and version management for Git-based software projects - At least two years of practical experience in the operation of Docker applications and medium-sized processes in container operations - At least two years of practical experience in dealing with Kubernetes - At least two years of practical experience in dealing with at least one other Kubernetes derivative - At least two years of practical experience in container management - At least two years of experience in the deployment and configuration of monitoring tools - At least two years of experience in monitoring container applications with Prometheus, Grafana, Elasticsearch, Kibana - At least three years of experience in Linux administration - Certification in CKA or CKAD - At least three years of experience with Kubernetes deployments and Docker technologies - At least three years of experience in planning, designing and operating Kubernetes clusters - At least two years of experience in planning and creating IT concepts in the public cloud infrastructure environment - Expert knowledge in database administration and database design in the operation of Kubernetes cluster environments and/or experience in the use of ITIL tools as part of ITIL processes - Good knowledge of the operating processes according to ITIL or ITSM - Good knowledge of the German language, both written and spoken, as well as knowledge of English, which enables the use of manufacturer information or Internet specialist forums - Good knowledge of IT security in accordance with BSI standards or comparable IT security standards of other EU countries - Deployment and configuration of monitoring tools such as Kibana, Grafana, Prometheus and others - Two years of experience in implementing API interfaces - Vulnerability analysis and fixing of containers - Two years of experience with transport standards of public administration - Confident handling of scripting - Practical experience of at least six months or practiced routine in Reverse - Practical experience of at least six months or practiced routine in configuring Ingress Server - Practical experience of at least six months or practiced routine in Git workflows - Confident handling of Infrastructure-as-Code (Ansible) - Solid knowledge of SQL basics - Solid knowledge of network basics - Experience of at least six months in the use of ITIL tools as part of ITIL processes - At least three months of experience in the preparation of IT security concepts, load tests and penetration tests - Knowledge in the areas of Rancher, Mirantis and Ansible Further details can be found in the service description

Details: Notice Of Intent (a&e Solicitation For Sf330: Doiffb0250022)presolicitation Notice Of Intent. This Is Not A Request For Proposal. This Is A Request For Standard Form (sf) 330 Architect-engineer Qualification Packages Only. All Information Needed To Submit Sf 330 Documents Is Contained Herein. No Solicitation Package, Technical Information, Or Bidder¿s List Will Be Issued. The Government Will Not Pay, Nor Reimburse Any Costs Associated With Responding To This Request. The Government Is Under No Obligation To Award A Contract As A Result Of This Announcement.1. Introduction: This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For Pr Number 0044001767 Which Requires Architect And/or Engineering (a&e) Services To Evaluate The Impact Of Incorporating Electric Vehicle (ev) Charging Stations, Update The Estimate Of Probable Costs, And Perform A Code Review For The Phase Ii Addition To The Administration Facility Located At The E. B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge, Atlantic County, New Jersey, That Was Initially Designed In 2015. This Project Is A 100% Set-aside For Small Business Concerns. The Naics Code For This Procurement Is 541330 ¿ ¿engineering Services¿ And The Annual Small Business Size Standard Is $25.5m. All Information Needed To Submit Sf330 Documents Is Contained Herein. Federal Acquisition Regulations (far) 36.6 Selection Procedures Apply. The Architectural/engineering Sources Listed Herein Are Being Procured Utilizing The Selection Ofarchitects And Engineer¿s Statute, Also Known As The Brooks Act Or Qualifications Based Selection (qbs), Far Part 36.6. All Submissions Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With(iaw) The Evaluation Criteria Identified In The Selection Criteria. Only The Top Three (3) Firms Deemed To Be The Most Highly Qualified, After Initial Source Selection, May Be Chosen For Discussions/interviews. Please Note That The Technical Evaluation Board May Choose Not To Engage Firms In Discussions/interviews If The Initial Selection Evaluation Is Determined Sufficient To Proceed Without Conducting Discussions/interviews. Firms Will Be Selected Based On Demonstrated Competence And Qualifications For The Required Work As Submitted.2. Description: The Government Is Seeking An A&e Firm To Provide All Professional Services Required To Complete The Following Tasks:1) code And Permitting Review: - Identify Updates To Applicable Codes And Environmental Permitting Requirements Since The Original Design. - The Following Codes And Standards Will Be Reviewed And Analyzed For Updates: International Building Code (ibc) International Energy Conservation Code (iecc) American Society Of Heating, Refrigerating, And Air-conditioning Engineers (ashrae) Standard 90.1 Applicable National Fire Protection Association (nfpa) Codes State And Local Environmental Regulations Architectural Barriers Act (aba) Guiding Principles For Sustainable Federal Buildings Federal Acquisition Regulation (far) 36.601-3(a), Including Requirements For: - Use Of Recovered Materials - Energy Conservation, Pollution Prevention, And Waste Reduction - Specification Of Energy Star Or Femp-designated Products (per Far Subpart 23.2) Fws Agency-specific Requirements For It Infrastructure Fws Standardized Physical Security Countermeasure Handbook - Deliver A Discipline-specific Summary Report Detailing Code Changes, Their Impact On The Project And, Required Updates To Construction Documents. 2) ev Charging Station Analysis:- Coordinate With U.s. Fish & Wildlife Service (fws) Staff To Establish The Desired Number Of Ev Charging Stations.- Analyze The Impact Of These Additions On The Phase Ii Design.3) cost Estimate Update- Update The Estimate Of Probable Costs To Reflect Current Market Conditions For Materials, Labor, And Other Project Costs. This Will Include: Base Bid Four (4) Additive Items Proposed Ev Charging Stations. 4) Project Review - Conduct A Web-based Review Meeting To Discuss The Findings And Recommendations Outlined In The Summary Report.3. Inquiries: Personal Visits For The Purpose Of Discussing This Announcement Will Not Be Entertained Or Scheduled. Selection Shall Be In The Order Of Preference From The Firms Considered Most Highly Qualified. Questions May Be Directed Only By Email To: Jerry_perry@fws.gov4. Selection Process: Sf 330s Will Be Evaluated In Accordance With The Selection Criteria As Stated In This Pre-solicitation Notice. These Evaluations Will Determine The Mosthighly Qualified Firms For This Requirement. In Accordance With Far 36.602-3-(c), Three (3) Of The Most Highly Qualified Firms Will Then Be Notified Of The Government¿s Intentto (or Not To) Hold Discussions/interviews. If Held, Discussions Will Be Held With The Most Highly Qualified Firms In The Form Determined To Be Most Advantageous And Economical By The Contracting Officer. This May Include In Writing, Via Phone Interview, Or In-person Interview Presentations. The Firms Invited To Participate In Discussions Will Be Notified By Email And Provided Further Instructions, Including Any Questions Or Topics To Address. Following The Completion Of Discussions, The Firms Will Be Evaluated And Ranked For Selection Based On The Selection Criteria, And The Most Highly Qualified Firm Will Be Selected And Subsequently Sent The Solicitation. The Final Evaluation And Ranking Will Consider The Sf 330 Submission For Each Firm, As Well As Additional Information Obtained Via Discussions. A Site Visit May Be Authorized For The Highest Rated Firm During The Negotiation Process At No Cost To The Government. If Negotiations Are Not Successful With The Highest-rated Firm, The Firm Will Be Notified That Negotiations Have Been Terminated. Negotiations Will Then Be Initiated With The Next Highest Rated Firm, And So On Until An Award Can Be Made Or The Requirement Is Canceled.5. Submission Requirements: All Responding Firms Are Required To Submit Standard Form 330, Architect-engineer Qualifications, Part I And Part Ii. Instructions And Fillablecopies Of The Sf 330 Document May Be Obtained From The Gsa Forms Library Or On-line At Https://www.gsa.gov/reference/forms/architectengineer-qualifications. The Sf 330, Part Imust Clearly Indicate The Office Location Where The Work Will Be Performed, The Qualification Of The Individuals And Subcontractors Proposed To Work On The Contract, And Theirgeographical Location.you Must Submit Your Qualifications, And Any Supplemental Information (such As Past Performance, Spreadsheets, Backup Data, And Technical Information), Electronically Tojerry_perry@fws.gov No Later Than: 3:00pm (eastern), Tuesday, January 10, 2025.email Subject Lines Must Be Labeled:¿a&e Sol# Doiffb0250022 ¿ E.b. Forsythe Nwr Es Addition To Hq Code Review¿. Files Must Be Readable Using The Current Adobe Portable Document Format (pdf). A. Late Sf 330 Submissions Received After The Due Date And/or Time Will Be Handled In Accordance With Far 15.208(b). Please Allow Sufficient Time For Your Sf 330package To Be Received Prior To The Proposed Closing Date/time.b. Please See Far 15.207(c) For A Description Of The Steps The Government Shall Take Regarding Unreadable Offers.c. To Avoid Rejection Of An Offer, Vendors Must Make Every Effort To Ensure Their Electronic Submission Is Virus-free.d. Password-protecting Your Offer Is Not Permitted.e. Please Note That The Government Shall Not Accept .zip Files.f. Package Limitations: Sf 330s Shall Be Limited To A Maximum Of Thirty (30), Single Sided, Single-spaced, And Numbered Pages. This Includes A Cover/title Page, Table Ofcontents, And Any Other Relevant Information. If More Than Thirty (30) Single-sided Pages Are Submitted, All Pages After Thirty (30) Pages Will Not Be Evaluated. The Fontfor Text Shall Be Times New Roman 12-point Or Larger.part Ii Of The Sf 330 And Any Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (cpars) Reports And Past Performance Questionnaires Will Not Count As Part Of Thepage Limitations.the Sf 330 Shall Be Submitted In One Email And Have A File Size No Larger Than 5 Mb. No Hard Copies Will Be Accepted.page Limits Apply To The Following Sections Of The Sf 330:* Section E - Resumes (limit To 1 Page Per Team Member)* Section F - Example Projects (limit To 1 Page Per Project)* Section G - Key Personnel Participation In Example Projects (limit 1 Page)* Section H - Additional Information (limit This Section To 8 Pages Total) Provide Additional Information Demonstrating The Proposed Team's Qualifications And Past Experience To Fulfill The Contract Requirements.g. All Sf 330 Submissions Must Include The Following Information Either On The Sf 330 Or By Accompanying Document: 1) Cage Code; 2) Unique Entity Identifier (uei); 3) Tax Id Number; 4) Primary Point Of Contact; 5) Email Address And Phone Number Of The Primary Point Of Contact;h. Note: Only Submissions From Small Business Concerns Will Be Acceptable For This Project. In Order To Be Considered, The Firm Must Be Registered In The System For Award Management (sam) Database (www.sam.gov) And Certified By The Sba As A Small Business Concern; Failure To Accomplish Either Aforementioned Task By The Time The Sf 330 Is Due Shall Result In Elimination From Consideration As A Proposed Contractor.9. Fws Primary Point Of Contact: Jerry W. Perry, Contracting Officer, Email: Jerry_perry@fws.gov.10. Selection Criteria: The Fws Will Utilize The Following Selection Criteria In Descending Order Of Importance To Evaluate Firms:(a) Technical Proposal - Sf 330 Evaluation - Stage I (pre-selection)factor 1 - Professional Qualification(1) Professional Qualifications Necessary For Satisfactory Performance Of Required Services.a. The A&e Firm Must Be Registered And Licensed To Complete Design Work For Projects Completed In The State Of New Jersey.b. Specific Qualifications (i.e., Education, Training, Registration, Certifications, Overall Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm) Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project.c. The A&e Must Have At Least Five (5) Years Of Engineering Experience.d. Provide Professional License Numbers And/or Proof Of Licensure Of Key Personnel Proposed To Complete Work On The Project.factor 2 - Specialized Experience And Technical Competence(2) Specialized Experience And Technical Competence In The Type Of Work Required:a. Specialized Experience And Technical Competence Will Be Evaluated Based On The Team Members' Knowledge, Both Individually And Collectively As A Team. Experience Should Include: I. Experience And Knowledge Of The Tasks Identified In Paragraph 2 Of This Notice Ii. Facility Upgradesiii. Construction Inspection Services V. Site Investigations Vi. Life Safety And Certification Services And Reportsvii. New Construction And Renovationsb. Firms Shall Submit Project Information On At Least Three (3) But No More Than Five (5) Designs For Projects That Best Match The Scope Of This Project. Designs Must Be Complete Or Substantially Complete Prior To The Due Date Of This Pre-solicitation Notice Of Intent.c. Describe Processes In Relation To Design Quality Management Procedures, Computer-aided Design And Drafting/building Information Modeling, Building Information Modeling, Equipment Resources, And Any Proposed Subcontractors.factor 3 - Schedule And Capacity(3) Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. Provide The Following Items To Demonstrate Capacity:a. Provide Project Lists For Designs In Progress Or Completed By The Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project; Indicate How The Team Accomplishes Multiple, Large, And Small Projects Simultaneously, At Different Locations, Within Required Timeframes.b. Provide The Number Of And Types Of Employees (prime And Subcontractor), Including The Availability Of Additional Competent, Regular Employees For Support Of Projects, And The Depth And Size Of The Organization.c. For Any Work Awarded By Fws, Provide Volume Of Work During The Previous 12 Months To The Prime And All Subcontractors.factor 4 - Relevant Past Performance(4) Past Performance On Contracts With Government Agencies And Private Industry In Terms Of Cost Control, Quality Of Work, And Compliance With Performance Schedules.a. Submit The Prime Firm's Past Performance Information To Determine The Degree To Which It Demonstrates The Likelihood It Can Successfully Perform The Requirements Of The Work As Described Herein. Submit Evaluation Information For All Projects Submitted For Factor 2, Specialized Experience, And Technical Competence. If Unable To Obtain A Completed Cpars, Past Performance Questionnaires (ppq) Are Acceptable. Please Utilize The Attached Ppq Document. If Unable To Obtain A Completed Ppq For A Factor 2 Project, Provide The Customer's Contact Information Along With The Contract Information. In The Case Of A Joint Venture, Llc, Or Other Teaming Arrangement Formed For The Purpose Of Competing For This Contract, The Government Will Evaluate The Past Performance Of The Entities That Comprise The Newly Formed Entity. The Government Will Use The Information Either Furnished By The Offeror And Reference(s) And/or Information Obtained From Other Independent Data Sources In Evaluating Past Performance.b. Submit Any Performance Rating Information, Especially For Fws Projects, As Well As Information About The Reputation And Standing Of The Firm And Its Principal Officials With Respect To Professional Performance, General Management, And Cooperativeness.c. Submit Any Record Of Significant Claims Against The Firm Because Of Improper Or Incomplete Architectural And Engineering Services.d. For Firms Without A Record Of Relevant Past Performance Or For Whom Relevant Past Performance Information Is Not Available, The Firm Will Not Be Evaluated Favorably Or Unfavorably. However, Firms Must Document Having At Least Five (5) Years Of Experience.e. Failure To Provide Requested Data, Accessible Points Of Contact, Or Valid Phone Numbers Could Result In A Firm Being Considered Less Qualified.factor 5 - Location(5) Location In The General Geographical Area Of The Project And Knowledge Of The Locality Of The Project; Provided, That Application Of The Criterion Leaves An Appropriate Number Of Qualified Firms Given The Nature And Size Of The Project.a. Firms Must Demonstrate Knowledge Of The Locality Which May Include State Licenses Or Projects Completed For Designs Of Projects Within The State Where The Design Shall Be Constructed.(b) Priced Proposal - Stage Iifactor 6 - Price(1) Price. When Requested By The Contracting Officer, And Following Evaluations Of Stage I Technical Proposals, The Offeror Shall Submit A Price Proposal On The Schedule For Each Item. When Completing The Price Schedule Of The Item(s), The Offeror Shall Provide Fully Loaded Labor Rates. Fully Loaded Rates Shall Include Wages, Overhead, General, Administrative Expenses, And Profit.table 1 - Rating Evaluation Factors:table 1. Rating Evaluation Factorsadjectival Descriptionoutstandingproposal Meets Requirements And Indicates An Exceptional Approach, Understanding And Capability Of The Requirements. Strengths Far Outweigh Any Weaknesses. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is Very Low.excellentproposal Meets Requirements And Indicates A Thorough Approach, Understanding And Capability Of The Requirements. Proposal Contains Strengths Which Outweigh Any Weaknesses. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is Low.acceptableproposal Meets Requirements And Indicates An Adequate Approach, Understanding, And Capability Of The Requirements. Strengths And Weaknesses Are Offsetting Or Will Have Little Or No Impact On Contract Performance. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is No Worse Than Moderate.marginalproposal Does Not Clearly Meet Requirements And Has Not Demonstrated An Adequate Approach, Understanding And Capability Of The Requirements. The Proposal Has One Or More Weaknesses Which Are Not Offset By Strengths. Risk Of Unsuccessful Performance Is High.unacceptable Proposal Does Not Meet Requirements And Contains One Or More Deficiencies. Proposal Will Not Result In An Award.neutral (for Past Performance Only)no Recent/relevant Performance Record Is Available, Or The Offeror's Performance Record Is So Sparse That No Meaningful Confidence Assessment Rating Can Be Reasonably Assigned.

Details: Page 2 Of 2 description: This Is A Pre-solicitation Notice For The Establishment Of An Architect-engineering (a-e) Contract With Services To Be Performed At The Salem Va Medical Center At 1970 Roanoke Blvd, Salem, Va 24153. This Requirement Is Being Executed Under A 100% Set-aside To Service-disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (sdvosb) Firms. This Announcement Is Not A Request For Proposal; No Solicitation Package Will Be Issued Until After An Evaluation Has Been Made On The Provided Sf-330s. The Sf-330 Can Be Downloaded Through The Gsa Forms Library At: Http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/top, Scroll Down To Locate And Click On The Sf-330 Hyperlink Entitled, Architect-engineer Qualifications. Interested Firms Should Submit Their Current Sf-330, Parts I And Ii, To Chanel.johnson@va.gov. The Sf-330s Are Due No Later Than 9:00 Am, Est, February 18, 2025. scope Of Work: intent provide Professional Engineering Services To Include Option Analysis, Phasing Design, Investigative Surveys And Reports, Planning, Consultation And Visits, Design Work, Preparation Of Contract Drawings And Specifications, Preparation Of Cost Estimates And Provision Of Construction Period Services As Necessary For Project 658-24-109 Renovate Patient Restrooms, At Vamc Salem, Virginia. The Restrooms Identified For Renovation Shall Be Brought Up To Department Of Veterans Affairs (va) Standards And Specifications As Well As The Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility (abaa) Standards. There Are 18 Restrooms Currently Planned To Be In The Scope Of This Project. The Va Will Review The Cost Estimate At The Design Development Stage And Confirm Or Alter The List Of Restrooms. In No Case Will New Restrooms Be Added To The Scope But One Or More May Be Removed If Necessary To Meet The Available Funding.   The Project Intent Is To Develop A Complete Design Package That Addresses All Va And Abaa Requirements On Restrooms In Building 143. Restrooms To Be Brought Up To Standards Typically Require Expansion And Complete Renovation Of All Finishes And Fixtures. design Efforts Shall Include: conduct A Site Investigation Of All Identified Restrooms In Building 143. Identify Nonconformance Issues Using The Requirements Of All Applicable Va Standards And Specifications, And Of The Abaa Standards. utilizing A Rating Or Scoring System, Identify The Restrooms That Are Priority Based On Greater Nonconformity With Standards. Ratings / Scoring Shall Be Documented In A Schedule Such That The Construction Can Be Phased Accordingly. For The Design Development (60%) Submission Review, The Va Will Review The Cost Estimate Submission And Confirm Or Alter The Restrooms That Will Be In Scope. provide A Recommendation For Va Personnel To Follow Up, Regarding Requirements Of The Abaas For Wheelchair Accessible Toile Rooms In Existing Buildings. Specifically, Use F202 Existing Buildings And Facilities, Paragraph F213.2, Exception Number 4 To Determine Whether Va Policy And Requirements For Renovations May Take Advantage Of This Exception, And Recommend Methods To Comply To Include: provision Of Two Wheelchair Accessible Unisex Single Use Toilet Rooms Per Floor. Recommend Other Renovations As Needed Such As Grab Bars And Clearance Of Fixtures, For The Other Single Use Toilet Rooms On Each Floor. make A Recommendation On Whether To Provide On Each Floor One Wheelchair Accessible Unisex Single Use Toilet Room, And One Ambulatory Accessible Toilet Room Of A Lesser Minimum Square Footage. examine Whether On The First Floor, The Single Use Toilet Rooms Constitute A Cluster Of Single Use Toilet Rooms And Are Therefore Subject To A Minimum Of 50% Wheelchair Accessible. examine Potential Benefits Or Impacts On The Basement Floor Of Building 143, Where We Have Identified Five Single Use Toilet Rooms For Renovation. The Benefits To Examine Are The Expected Completion Of Four Wheelchair Accessible Toilet Rooms With More Than One Toilet (two Men S And Two Women S), Which Are Being Renovated And Brought Up To Abaas Compliance As Part Of Project# 658-24-104 Renovate Main Lobby. Specifically Make A Recommendation Whether The Completion Of Those Restroom Renovations Will Mean No Other Toilet Rooms Need Be Made Wheelchair Accessible But Only Meet Ambulatory Patient Requirements Such As Space In The Room And Clearance Of Fixtures, Provision Of Grab Bars, Etc. Examine According To The The Requirements Of F213.2 And Exception 4 But Also Any Applicable Va Policies And Standards Which Speak To The Issue. provide A Complete Design Package Which Shall Include Drawings And Construction Specifications To Renovate All Restrooms Included In The Program. In Addition To The Overall Restoration Requirements, The Following Shall Also Be Required: a/e Satisfy The Following Milestones: schematic Design (30%) drawings outline Specifications And A Draft Of The Submittal Register construction Cost Estimate design Development Review Meeting final Design Submission (95%). The Final Design Shall Be Complete, Free Of Errors And Ready In The A/e Firm S Judgment To Be Issued For Construction. The Purpose Of The Review Is A Check For Inadvertent Errors And No Further Design Is Anticipated Other Than Correction Of Errors In The Set. drawings full Specifications And The Submittal Register construction Cost Estimate design Development Review Meeting construction Documents (100%) drawings full Specifications construction Cost Estimate construction Documents Review Meeting . the A/e Shall Complete The Project Design In Accordance With This A/e Scope, With All Applicable Va Standards And Specifications, And With Abaa Standards For Toilet Rooms In Healthcare Facilities Unless Otherwise Approved By The Va. The A/e Shall Retrieve All Va Design Information And Standards From The Va Facilities Web Site (http://www.va.gov/facmgt/standard). The A/e Shall Incorporate These Documents And All National, State And Local Codes Adopted And Used By The Va In The Design Of This Project. All Applicable Standards Shall Be Reflected In The Construction Cost Estimate. The Facility Record Drawings And Autocad Files Are Available For The A/e S Use. Note: Not All Record Drawings Are Available On Autocad. Additionally, The Accuracy Of Facility Record Drawings Must Be Field Verified By The A/e. At A Minimum, The A/e Shall Utilize The Following References, As Applicable, For Planning And Design Purposes. national Cad Standards And Standard Details Pg-18-4 vha Program Guide Pg-18-3 va Master Construction Specifications Pg-18-1 h-18-8 Seismic Design Requirements sanitary Design Manual For Hospital Projects pg-18-13 Barrier Free Design Handbook nfpa Codes design Manuals Pg-18-10 cultural Resource Management D-7545 & H-7545 government-furnished Record Drawings (a/e To Field Verify Conditions) pg-18-15 A/e Submission Requirements. pg-18-12 Design Guides (graphical, By Function) pg-18-14 Room Finishes, Door, And Hardware Schedules facility Guidelines Institute (fgi) american Institute Of Architects (aia) a/e Shall Address The Following Items In The Design: estimate Of Construction Project Costs And Duration Including Simplified Schedule To Include Progress And Final Inspections And All Work Required For The Base Bid And The Bid Alternatives. Revise Cost Estimates And Schedules For Each Design Submittal. access To Buildings Must Remain Adequately Operational And Completely Protected During Site Investigations And Shall Be Phased To Minimize Impacts To Patients During The Construction Process. contractor Shall Comply With All Applicable Records Management Laws And Regulations, As Well As National Archives And Records Administration (nara) Records Policies, Including But Not Limited To The Federal Records Act (44 U.s.c. Chs. 21, 29, 31, 33), Nara Regulations At 36 Cfr Chapter Xii Subchapter B, And Those Policies Associated With The Safeguarding Of Records Covered By The Privacy Act Of 1974 (5 U.s.c. 552a). These Policies Include The Preservation Of All Records, Regardless Of Form Or Characteristics, Mode Of Transmission, Or State Of Completion. the A/e Has Responsibility For Duty To Report Any Fraud, Waste And Abuse Witnessed While On Va Premises To The Integrity And Compliance Officer. the Following Quantities Of Design Review Material Are Required For The Schematic Design, Design Development, Final Design, And Construction Document Submissions: one (1) Full Size, One (1) Half Size, And One (1) Electronic Set (pdf And Autocad 2022 Format) Of The Design Drawings. two (2) Paper Copies And One (1) Electronic Copy (ms Word) Of Sample Edited And Marked-up (track Changes Enabled) Va Master Specifications. two (2) Hardcopy Sets And One (1) Electronic Set Of Final Engineering Calculations. provide Two (2) Hard Copies And One (1) Electronic Copy Each Of The Budgetary Cost Estimate And Preliminary Schedule. in Addition To Those Items Listed Above In Item 5, For The Construction Document Submission The Following Quantities Of Review Materials Are Required. This Submission Shall Include Severable Components And The Overall Project As Described Above: brief Description Of Work For Inclusion In Ifb (microsoft Word), Including Descriptions Of Deductive Alternates And Associated Completion Times. list Of Sole Source Items With Justification (if Applicable). list Of Or-equal Items With Justification (if Applicable). schedule: overall Period Of Performance: 210 Days From The Notice To Proceed. site Investigation Report Is Due 45 Calendar Days From The Notice To Proceed. schematic Design (30%) Submission Is Due 45 Calendar Days From The Receipt Of The Site Investigation Report the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. design Development (60%) Submission Is Due 30 Calendar Days From The Date Schematic Design Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. final Design (95%) Submission Is Due 30 Calendar Days From The Date Design Development Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Provide Review Comments 15 Calendar Days From Receipt Of The Design Submission. construction Documents Submission Is Due 15 Calendar Days From The Date Full Design Review Comments Are Provided. the Government Will Accept The Construction Documents Within Five Calendar Days Of Receipt, Or Will Require Re-submission Of The Construction Documents If There Are Remaining Comments That Have Not Been Adequately Addressed. any Delays To The Schedule Due To Re-submissions That May Be Required Upon Government Review, Is The Responsibility Of The A/e And Shall Not Result In A Claim For Delay. evaluation Factors For Award the Government Will Award A Contract Resulting From This Solicitation To The Responsible Offeror Whose Offer Conforming To The Solicitation Will Be Most Advantageous To The Government, And Other Factors Considered. Boards Will Evaluate Firms' Qualifications Strictly On The Basis Of The Announced Selection Criteria And Their Stated Order Of Importance. The Criteria Will Be Applied As Follows: part I Technical Capability the Following Criteria Will Be Used To By A Selection Board To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms In Respect To Their Technical Capability. Technical Capability Will Be Evaluated Based On The Following Factors: specialized Experience And Technical Competence (far 36.602-1(a)(2)). Offerors Will Be Evaluated Based On The Specialized Experience Of A Firm On Similar Projects And The Technical Capabilities (such As Design Quality Management Procedures, Cadd/bim, And Equipment Resources,) Of The Prime Firm And Any Subcontractors. Evaluation Will Be Based On The Information Presented In The Architect-engineer Qualifications - Standard Form 330 (sf330). A Maximum Of Five (5) Example Projects May Be Submitted For Consideration Under Sf330, Part I, Section F. Example Projects Should Be Designs Completed Within Six (6) Years Of Solicitation Closing Date. professional Qualifications (far 36.602-1(a)(1)). A Board Will Evaluate, As appropriate, The Education, Training, Registration, Certifications (see Paragraph 3-4.d(4)), Overall And Relevant Experience, And Longevity With The Firm Of The Key Management And Technical Personnel. This Criterion Is Primarily Concerned With The Qualifications Of The Key Personnel And Not The Number Of Personnel, Which Is Addressed Under The Capacity Criterion. The Lead Designer In Each Discipline Must Be Registered As Required By Far 36.609-4 And 52.236-25 But Does Not Have To Be Registered In The Particular State Where The Project Is Located. capacity (far 36.602-1(a)(3)). A Firm S Capacity Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Experience With Similar Size Projects, The Available Capacity Of Key Disciplines To Perform The Work In The Required Time, And A Primary Design Schedule. The Volume Of Work Awarded During The Previous 12 Months, Based On Data Extracted From The Federal Procurement Data System, Will Be Considered When Evaluating Capacity. Additionally, The Full Potential Value Of Any Current Indefinite Delivery Contracts That A Firm Has Been Awarded Will Be Considered When Evaluating Capacity. knowledge Of The Locality (far 36.602-1(a)(5)). Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Knowledge Of The Locality Such As Knowledge Of Local Historical Features, Climatic Conditions, And Local Construction Methods That Are Unusual Or Unique To The Area. design Quality Control Plan. Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Approach To Ensure Technical Quality And Accuracy Of Work Products. A Firm's Approach To Resolve Issues Of Quality Will Be Analyzed To Determine Its Ability To Provide Quality Design Products. Describe And Define The Processes Of The Firm's Quality Control Plan And List, By Name And Position, All Key Personnel Responsible For Its Execution. Quality Control Information Shall Also Address Safety Measures Particularly With Respect To Field Work And Site Investigations. Information Describing Quality Management May Be Presented In Sf330, Part I, Section H. A Design Quality Control Plan Shall Be Submitted As Part Of The Proposal. experience In Construction Period Services. Firms Will Be Evaluated On Their Experience In Providing Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During Construction, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Request For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Preparing Cost Estimates. part Ii Past Performance the Following Criteria Will Be Used To By A Selection Board To Determine The Most Highly Qualified Firms Based On A Firm S Past Performance. past Performance (far 36.602-1(a)(4)). Firms Will Be Evaluated Based On Their Cpars For Past Projects. part I Technical Capability first, The Technical Capability Of All Offers Will Be Evaluated On An Adjectival Basis. Sub-factors Will Be Weighted Equally, And All Areas Must Have At Least A Satisfactory Rating. evaluators Shall Assign A Rating From The Following Table Based On The Minimum Requirements Stated In Each Sub-factor Section. adjectival Rating definitions exceptional meets All Requirements And Exceed Majority Of Requirements. Overall The Proposal Meets And Significantly Exceeds, In All Aspects, The Standards For Evaluation: Very High Probability Of Success: No Significant Weaknesses. very Good meets All Requirements And Exceed Some Requirements. The Proposal Meets And, In Some Cases, Exceeds The Standards For Evaluation; High Probability Of Success; No Significant Weaknesses And Only Minor Correctable Deficiencies. satisfactory the Proposal Meets The Standard For Evaluation; Good Probability Of Success; Only Minor Weaknesses And Correctable Deficiencies. marginal lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Of The Standards For Evaluation; Low Probability Of Success; Major Weaknesses And/or Uncorrectable. unacceptable lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Or All Of The Standards For Evaluation; Need Major Revision To A New Submission To Make If Acceptable Or May Contain Uncorrectable Deficiencies. sub-factor 1 Specialized Experience And Technical Competence criteria: This Factor Will Evaluate The Offeror S Technical Competence, Based On Successful Completion Of Projects, In The Design Of Fire Protection Systems In A Hospital Environment. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) Examples Of Their Choice Of Completed Projects Or In Progress Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000). In Describing The Experience, Provide The Following Information: project Title, Location And Brief Description Including The Building Use (medical Facility, Etc) And Contracting Method (design Build, Design Bid Construct, Cm At Risk, Turnkey, Etc). project Owner And Name And Telephone Number Of Owner S Contact Person. indicate Your Firm S Role As A Prime Contractor Or Subcontractor, Etc. project Prime Contractor And Major Subcontractors And Name And Telephone Number Of Contact Person(s). project Statistics Including Start And Completion Dates (original Vs. Actual) For Design; Cost (with Brief Explanation Of What Is Included In The Cost); Square Footage; And Any Awards (prizes) Received. sub-factor 2 Professional Qualifications criteria: This Factor Evaluates The Offerors Specific Experience And Qualifications Of Personnel Proposed For Assignment To The Project And Their Record Of Working Together As A Team. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Offeror Must Provide The Resumes For The Following Key Personnel Purposed For Assignment To The Project: project/design Manager: Must Have A Minimum Of Five (5) Years Experience Successfully Managing Design Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. electrical Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Two (2) Years Experience Designing Electrical Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. mechanical Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Hvac Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. civil Engineer: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Hvac Systems Within A Hospital Environment. Projects Shall Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. architect: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Designing Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above bim Manager: Must Have A Minimum Two (2) Years Experience Managing The Design Of Projects Using Building Information Modeling Software. other Disciplines Proposed By The Offeror: Must Have A Minimum Of Two (2) Years Experience Successfully Designing Projects That Meet The Criteria For Similar Projects As Defined In Evaluation Factor 3 Above. all Resumes Must Include The Following Information And May Not Exceed Two (2) Pages Per Resume, And Must Explain How The Proposed Key Personnel S Experience Meets The Minimum Qualification Requirements For This Contract, As Described Above: name And Title project Assignment name Of Firm With Which Associated sub-factor 3 Capacity criteria: This Factor Will Evaluate The Offeror S Ability To Perform Both The Design And Construction Period Services. The Offeror Shall Demonstrate That Is Has The Capacity To Accomplish The Work In The Required Time. Additionally, The Offeror Shall Show That It Can Perform The Required Site Investigations, Design Services, And Construction Period Services Without Adversely Affecting The Project Schedule. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides: offeror Must Specify The Total Volume Of Work Awarded To The Firm Within Twelve (12) Months Of Solicitation Closing And Provide A Proposed Design Schedule Not To Exceed 215 Calendar Days. Prepare And Submit A Practicable Design Schedule Laying Out All Necessary Performance Elements Needed To Complete This Project Identified In The Solicitation In The Proposed Period Of Performance. The Schedule Must Be In The Form Of A Progress Chart Of Suitable Scale To Indicate Appropriately The Percentage Of Work Scheduled For Completion By Any Given Date During The Performance Period. In Addition, The Schedule Must Be Submitted In The Microsoft Project Format. Offerors Should Only Include The Work Elements Necessary To Complete The Required Work. It Is The Offeror S Responsibility To Identify All Necessary Project/work Elements And The Proposal Adequately Identifies Acceptable Critical Path Elements. sub-factor 4 Knowledge Of The Locality criteria: Identify Example Projects That Demonstrate The Firms Knowledge Of The Locality (i.e. Salem Va Medical Center). minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides: firms Shall Demonstrate Knowledge Of Localities Per Example Projects. Knowledge Of The Va Visn 6 Service Area Will Hold Much Higher Weight And Evaluated More Favorably Than Projects Outside The Visn 6 Service Area. General Understanding Of The Local Conditions, Including Physical Environment, Local Engineering Criteria, And Construction Methods Will Be Evaluated. The Following Key Personnel Resumes Shall Also Be Evaluated For Knowledge Of Localities: Project Manager, Architectural, Mechanical, And Electrical. The Basis Of Evaluation For This Criterion Will Focus On The Information Provided In Sf330, Part I, Section E (resume Of Key Personnel), Section F (example Projects), And Section H (additional Information) That Provides Additional Information Describing Same/similar Qualifications As Deemed Relevant To Performance At The Salem Va Medical Center sub-factor 5 Design Quality Control Plan criteria: The Plan Shall Identify Personnel, Design Review Procedures, Site Investigation/confirmation Of Existing Conditions Plan, Tests Proposed, And Forms To Be Used. A Finalized, More Detailed Design Quality Control Plan (qcp) Will Be Required To Be Submitted And Approved After Contract Award. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standards Of Acceptability Are Met When The Offeror Provides: a Description Of The Quality Control System, Including A Chart Showing Lines Of Authority And Acknowledgement That The Design Manager Shall Implement Control Measures For Verification Of All Design Activities. the Names, Qualifications (in Resume Format), Duties, Responsibilities, And Authorities Of Each Person Assigned As Design Quality Control (qc) Manager. Any Replacements Must Have Similar Qualifications In Dealing With Projects Of Similar Size And Scope. sub-factor 6 - Experience In Construction Period Services criteria: Identify Example Projects That Demonstrate The Firms Experience Providing Construction Period Services. Will Be Evaluated On Their Experience In Providing Construction Period Services To Include Professional Field Inspections During Construction, Review Of Construction Submittals, Support In Answering Request For Information, And Support Of Construction Contract Changes To Include Drafting Statements Of Work And Preparing Cost Estimates. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) Examples Of Their Choice Of Completed Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000) For Which Construction Period Services Were Provided. part Ii Past Performance next, The Government Will Evaluate The Offeror S Demonstrated Past Performance Of Projects In Order To Determine The Offeror S Ability To Perform The Contract Successfully And Help Determine Responsibility. As With Technical Capabilities, The Firms Will Be Evaluated With An Adjectival Rating System. adjectival Rating definitions exceptional meets All Requirements And Exceed Majority Of Requirements. Overall The Proposal Meets And Significantly Exceeds, In All Aspects, The Standards For Evaluation: Very High Probability Of Success: No Significant Weaknesses. very Good meets All Requirements And Exceed Some Requirements. The Proposal Meets And, In Some Cases, Exceeds The Standards For Evaluation; High Probability Of Success; No Significant Weaknesses And Only Minor Correctable Deficiencies. satisfactory the Proposal Meets The Standard For Evaluation; Good Probability Of Success; Only Minor Weaknesses And Correctable Deficiencies. marginal lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Of The Standards For Evaluation; Low Probability Of Success; Major Weaknesses And/or Uncorrectable. unacceptable lacks Material Information. The Proposal Fails To Meet Some Or All Of The Standards For Evaluation; Need Major Revision To A New Submission To Make If Acceptable Or May Contain Uncorrectable Deficiencies. note: Offerors With No Relevant Past Performance History Will Not Be Evaluated Favorably Or Unfavorably On Past Performance And Will Be Given A Neutral Rating. criteria: Offerors Must Provide A Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) References Of Their Choice Of Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Building Remodel/renovation; Minimum Construction Threshold Value Of $500,000). The Offeror Must Provide For Each Reference The Reference's Company Name, Pocs, Address, Contact Information To Include Phone Number And E-mail Address, Project Description, Dollar Value And Period Of Performance. The Government Will Consider And Evaluate Offeror's Past Performance Information, To Include The References, Which Are Deemed Recent And Relevant For The Requirements Of This Rfp. recency Assessment: An Assessment Of The Past Performance Information Will Be Made To Determine If It Is Recent. To Be Recent, The Effort Must Be Ongoing Or Must Have Been Performed During The Past 6 Years From The Date Of Issuance Of This Solicitation. Past Performance Information That Fails This Condition Will Not Be Evaluated. relevancy Assessment: An Evaluation Of All Recent Performance Information Obtained To Determine Whether The Provided Design Performed Under Those Contracts Relate To A Similar Size And Scope As Those Required By This Solicitation. In Determining The Relevancy Of Effort Performed Under Individual Past Performance Contracts, The Government Will Consider The Specific Effort Or Portion Consistent With That Proposed By The Prime Contractor And/or Subcontractors. The Past Performance Information Obtained From Sources Will Be Used To Establish The Relevancy Of Past Performance. minimum Standard Of Acceptability: The Minimum Standard Of Acceptability Is Met When The Offeror Provides Minimum Of Three (3) And A Maximum Of Five (5) References Of Their Choice Of Projects Of Similar Contracts In Size And Scope (hospital Building Remodel/renovation; Minimum Threshold Value Of $500,000) In Which The Offeror Adhered To Period Of Performances. The Offeror Must Provide For Each Reference The Reference's Company Name, Pocs, Address, Contact Information To Include Phone Number And E-mail Address, Project Description, Dollar Value And Period Of Performance. The Government Will Consider And Evaluate Offeror's Past Performance Information, To Include The References, Which Are Deemed Recent And Relevant For The Requirements Of This Rfp. -- End Of Item 8. Evaluation Criteria -- release Of Claims For Delivery Orders: Prior To The Final Payment Under Each Delivery Order Issued Under This Contract Or Prior To Settlement Upon Termination Of The Delivery Order, And As A Condition Precedent Thereto, The A/e Shall Execute And Deliver To The Contracting Officer A Release Of All Claims Against The Government Arising Under Or By Virtue Of This Contract, Other Than Such Claims, If Any, As May Be Specifically Excepted By The A/e From The Operation Of The Release In Stated Amounts To Be Set Forth Therein. upon Completion Of Construction And Incorporation Of All Revisions Required To Complete The Record Drawings, The Following Items Shall Be Submitted: a. 1 Set Of Reproducible Hard Copy As-built Plans (30 X 42 ) Plus An Electronic Set In Autocad Version 2022 (.dwg) And Pdf Format.

Details: Division02-existing Conditions Division03-concrete Division05-metals Division06-wood, Plastics, And Composites Division07-thermal And Moisture Protection Division08-openings Division09-finishes Division10-specialties Division11-equipment Division12-furnishings Division21-fire Suppression Division22-plumbing Division23-heating, Ventilating, And Air Conditioning Division25-integrated Automation Division26-electrical Division27-communication Division28-electronic Safety And Security ***documents Are Available Through The Construction Association*** New Pnb Public Health Laboratory Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dr-georges-l.-dumont Moncton, Nb 848-ha1 By478a Bid Depository Tender Closing Date January 14, 2025. Address All Inquiries To Architects 4 Limited 18 Botsford Street, Suite 100 Moncton, Nb, E1c 4w7 506-857-8601 Site Visit Date & Time December 12, 2024 At 10:00 Am Contact Georges Cormier 506-850-9611 Pay Equity The Government Of New Brunswick Is Committed To Encouraging And Incentivizing The Adoption Of Pay Equity By Employers Doing Business With Government. The Women's Equality Branch Has Developed An Online Pay Equity Learning Module For Employers. To Complete The Module And Obtain Your Certificate Of Completion, Please Visit Www.gnb.ca/payequity. For Questions, Please Contact The Pay Equity Bureau Toll Free: (877) 253-0266 Or By Email: Peb-bes@gnb.ca This Is A Tender Notice Only. In Order To Submit A Bid, You Must Obtain Official Tender Documents From The New Brunswick Opportunities Network, Another Authorized Tendering Service Or As Indicated In The Tender Notice. Effective December 1, 2022, The Crown Construction Contracts Act And Regulations Are Repealed. This Procurement Is Subject To The Procurement Act And Construction Services Regulation. Covid-19 Supplier Vaccination Policy Suppliers Must Comply With All Gnb Health And Safety Policies And Standards Including, Without Limitation, All Health And Safety Policies And Standards Related To Covid-19, As Applicable. Go To Www.gnb.ca/nbon To View The Full Policy And Faqs. All Bid Submissions Must Be Accompanied By A Security Deposit In The Amount Of Ten Percent (10%) Of The Total Bid Price. Further Details Related To Bid Bond Requirements, Contract Term And Insurance Requirements Are Listed In The Related Tender Documents. The Province Of New Brunswick Reserves The Right To Waive Minor Non-compliance Where Such Non-compliance Is Not Of A Material Nature In Its Sole And Absolute Discretion, Or To Accept Or Reject In Whole Or In Part Any Or All Bids, With Or Without Giving Notice. Such Minor Non-compliance Will Be Deemed Substantial Compliance And Capable Of Acceptance. The Province Will Be The Sole Judge Of Whether A Bid Is Accepted Or Rejected. This Procurement Is Subject To The Provisions Of The Canadian Free Trade Agreement, The Canada-european Union Comprehensive Economic And Trade Agreement, The Agreement On Government Procurement Under The World Trade Organization And The Comprehensive And Progressive Agreement For Trans-pacific Partnership. Further Details Related To Bid Bond Requirements, Contract Term And Insurance Requirements Are Listed In The Related Tender Documents.