Quezon City Tender

Description 1. In View Of The Two (2) Failed Biddings In Accordance With Section 53.1 Of The 2016 Revised Implementing Rules And Regulations Of The Republic Act No. 9184, The Philippine Space Agency, Through The General Appropriations Act For Fiscal Year 2024 Per Republic Act No. 11975 Intends To Apply The Sum Of Nineteen Million Pesos (php19,000,000.00) Being The Approved Budget For The Contract (abc) To Payments Under The Contract For Philsa Tfb No. 2024-002, Now Calls For The Submission Of Eligibility, Technical And Financial Proposals For The Abovementioned Procurement Project. Bids Received In Excess Of The Abc Shall Be Automatically Rejected At The Opening Of The Financial Proposals. Detailed Schedule Of Requirements Is Indicated In The Terms Of Reference (tor) Of The Project. 2. The Following Schedule Of Activities Shall Be Observed: Activities Inclusive Dates Advertisement Of Invitation To Negotiate November 12, 2024 – December 3, 2024 Submission Of Eligibility Documents November 19, 2024 – 9:30 Am Eligibility Check November 19, 2024 – 10:00 Am Negotiation Meeting November 19, 2024 – 2:00 Pm Last Day Of Submission Of Bids December 3, 2024 (tuesday) – 9:30 Am Opening Of Technical And Financial Proposal December 3, 2024 (tuesday) – 10:00 Am 3. Bidding Will Be Conducted Through Alternative Mode Of Procurement – Negotiated Procurement Under Two Failed Bidding Procedure Using Non-discretionary “pass/fail” Criterion As Specified In The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra 9184 On Eligibility And Preliminary Examination Of Bids. I. Bidding Is Open To All Interested Bidders, Whether Local Or Foreign, Subject To The Conditions For Eligibility Provided In The Irr Of Ra 9184. 4. The Criteria And Rating System For Technical Evaluation Are As Follows: Criteria Corresponding Points (maximum) A Proof Of Previous Works Of The Project Leader And Project Team Members Which Include Records Of Previous Engagement Or Quality Of Performance In Space-related Studies Maximum:30 Points 1 Proof Of Previous Works That Shows That They Have Prepared 5 Of The Deliverable Reports Requested In The Project Or Reports (i.e. Stakeholders' Engagement Report, Market Assessment Report, Economic Impact Assessments, National Space Industry Report, Space Industry Roadmap) In Space-related Studies 30 2 Proof Of Previous Works That Shows That They Have Prepared 4 Of The Deliverable Reports Requested In The Project Or Reports (i.e. Stakeholders' Engagement Report, Market Assessment Report, Economic Impact Assessments, National Space Industry Report, Space Industry Roadmap) In Space-related Studies 25 3 Proof Of Previous Works That Shows That They Have Prepared 3 Of The Deliverable Reports Requested In The Project Or Reports (i.e. Stakeholders' Engagement Report, Market Assessment Report, Economic Impact Assessments, National Space Industry Report, Space Industry Roadmap) In Space-related Studies 20 4 Proof Of Previous Works That Shows That They Have Prepared 1-2 Of The Deliverable Reports Requested In The Project Or Reports (i.e. Stakeholders' Engagement Report, Market Assessment Report, Economic Impact Assessments, National Space Industry Report, Space Industry Roadmap) In Space-related Studies 10 5 No Proof Of Previous Works That Shows That They Have Prepared The Deliverable Reports Requested In The Project Or Reports (i.e. Stakeholders' Engagement Report, Market Assessment Report, Economic Impact Assessments, National Space Industry Report, Space Industry Roadmap) In Space-related Studies 0 B Methodology Used And Outputs Of The Project Leader And Project Team Applied To Space-related Studies In The Past 10 Years Maximum: 35 Points 1 Has Proof Of Works That He/she Has Used Five (5) Of These Recommended Analyses Or Outputs As Specified In The Objectives Of This Project Namely: (1) Strategy Development; (2) Space Industry Analysis; (3) Market Analysis; (4) Economic Impact Assessment; And (5) Recommendations And Plan Of Action On The Technical, Economic, And Policy Considerations 35 2 Has Proof Of Works That He/she Has Used Four (4) Of These Recommended Analyses Or Outputs As Specified In The Objectives Of This Project Namely: (1) Strategy Development; (2) Space Industry Analysis; (3) Market Analysis; (4) Economic Impact Assessment; And (5) Recommendations And Plan Of Action On The Technical, Economic, And Policy Considerations 30 3 Has Proof Of Works That He/she Has Used Three (3) Of These Recommended Analyses Or Outputs As Specified In The Objectives Of This Project Namely: (1) Strategy Development; (2) Space Industry Analysis; (3) Market Analysis; (4) Economic Impact Assessment; And (5) Recommendations And Plan Of Action On The Technical, Economic, And Policy Considerations 20 4 Has Proof Of Works That He/she Has Used Two (2) Of These Recommended Analyses Or Outputs As Specified In The Objectives Of This Project Namely: (1) Strategy Development; (2) Space Industry Analysis; (3) Market Analysis; (4) Economic Impact Assessment; And (5) Recommendations And Plan Of Action On The Technical, Economic, And Policy Considerations 10 5 Has Proof Of Works That He/she Has Used One (1) Of These Recommended Analyses Or Outputs As Specified In The Objectives Of This Project Namely: (1) Strategy Development; (2) Space Industry Analysis; (3) Market Analysis; (4) Economic Impact Assessment; And (5) Recommendations And Plan Of Action On The Technical, Economic, And Policy Considerations 5 6 Has No Proof Of Works That He/she Has Used Any Of These Recommended Analyses Or Outputs As Specified In The Objectives Of This Project Namely: (1) Strategy Development; (2) Space Industry Analysis; (3) Market Analysis; (4) Economic Impact Assessment; And (5) Recommendations And Plan Of Action On The Technical, Economic, And Policy Considerations 0 C Availability And Commitment Of The Project Leader Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Services To Limit Substitution Or Replacement During Project Implementation Maximum: 20 Points 1 100% Availability & Commitment Of The Project Leader Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 20 2 90% Availability & Commitment Of The Project Leader Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 15 3 70% Availability & Commitment Of The Project Leader Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 10 4 50% Availability & Commitment Of The Project Leader Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 5 D Availability And Commitment Of The Project Team Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Services To Limit Substitution Or Replacement During Project Implementation Maximum: 15 Points 1 90% Average Availability & Commitment Of The Project Team Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 15 2 70% Average Availability & Commitment Of The Project Team Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 10 3 50% Average Availability & Commitment Of The Project Team Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 7 4 40% Or Below Average Availability & Commitment Of The Project Team Based On Agreed Man-months Of Consultancy Service 5 The Minimum St Required To Pass Is 75 Points. Assigned Numerical Weights Weight Technical Proposal 85% Financial Proposal 15% 5. The Procuring Entity Shall Evaluate Bids Using The Quality-cost Based Evaluation/selection (qcbe/qcbs) Procedure. The Procuring Entity Shall Indicate The Weights To Be Allocated For The Technical And Financial Proposals. The Criteria And Rating System For The Evaluation Of Bids Shall Be Provided In The Instructions To Bidders. 6. The Contract Shall Be Completed Within Eight (8) Months Upon Issuance Of The Notice To Proceed (ntp), Subject To Adjustments As Mutually Agreed Upon By Both Parties. 7. The Philippine Space Agency Reserves The Right To Reject Any And All Bids, Declare A Failure Of Bidding, Or Not Award The Contract At Any Time Prior To Contract Award In Accordance With Section 41 Of Ra 9184 And Its Irr, Without Thereby Incurring Any Liability To The Affected Bidder Or Bidders. Moreover, In Accordance With Section 24,7 Of The 2016 Revised Irr Of Ra 9184, Notwithstanding The Eligibility Of A Consultant And/or Inclusion In The Shortlist Of Consultants, Philippine Space Agency Reserves The Right To Review The Consultant’s Qualifications At Any Stage Of The Procurement Process If It Has Reasonable Grounds To Believe That A Misrepresentation Has Been Made, Or That There Has Been A Change In Consultant’s Capability To Undertake The Project From The Time Of Submission Of The Eligibility Requirements. 8. For Further Information, Please Refer To: Nauru Aljesher V. Sanchez Head, Bac Secretariat Bids And Awards Committee (bac) ℅ General Services Division Philippine Space Agency (philsa) 29th Floor, Eastwood Cyberone Building Eastwood Ave, Bagumbayan, Quezon City, Philippines 1800 Procurement@philsa.gov.ph Tel. No. (+632) 856 899 31 Https://philsa.gov.ph 12 November 2024 (sgd) Rocell Niño B. Vicente Vice-chairperson, Bids And Awards Committee